https://sites.google.com/site/scienceandmathguide/
Reminder: /sci/ is for discussing topics pertaining to science and mathematics, not for helping you with your homework or helping you figure out your career path.If you want advice regarding college/university or your career path, go to /adv/ - Advice.If you want help with your homework, go to /wsr/ - Worksafe Requests.
What if recent stagnation in physics is deliberate?I.e. some world-threatening* physics was discovered and it had to be buried by governments to preserve humanity...*threatening how?Well, imagine if there was a phenomenon that would allow every random retard to build equivalent of nuclear bomb from readily available items...How could you safely make such knowledge publicly available?
>>14505599
>>14506637I don't get it. How does that refute him?
>>14506637This meme is unironically the psyop, and is designed to shame open conversation online. You are projecting your glow onto everyone. Next you'll rage and start posting antisemetic memes, because you think that the insinuation of Jewishness will surely shut down free speech if being called a "lefty" doesn't work. You are a common archetype, and it's you who are unironically the mindslave.
>>14502266high speed centrifuges designed to separate 235 and 238 isotopes are not easy to build and are quite energy intensivethis is basically how we know iran have not built a nuclear weapon
>>14505599If you became inmortal you would most likely not remember everything. There has to be a limit to memory the way human beings can process it. If you were a thousands years old you would remember the 21st century the same way you remember your 10th birthday or something. It's about perspective
Russel Brand officially hates science https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oo7kfZ7DywA
>>14504737>they all see black and white>Actual science is not popsci nor scienceTM.so theres no gradations between actual science and popsci, its all just black and white?are you sure you're not just projecting your own phycological splitting fallacies onto others?
>>14504728who the fuck cares?
>>14504728His video titles are so vague I can't get myself to watch them
>>14504728who is Russel Brand?
>>14507567Some black guy from Britain.
NASA is not a valid source.
>>14506041does he know about 4chsn?
>>14506171
>>14501266The Ministry of Truth would never lie to me because I trust them though
>>14506335
Better late than Never editionprevious thread: >>14503242
>>14507425>shanties/work songsjust like pre-20th century american music
>>14507509not be retarded on twitter
>>14507533ah, yesthe traditional old west techno
Reposting>>14506762>At some point you need to realize that we're not going to be landing a hundred people on Mars over the next ten yearsLiterally no reason SpaceX won't be able to support sending ~3 crew starships to Mars 10 years from now.
>warosu has a massive time gap>fireden stopped archiving /sci/ in april for some reason>moe doesn't have search enabled for /sci/
Which one of these two outcomes is more physically likely?
>>14504642>enter>emergeIts not a magical mirror, its a wormhole. If it was a magical surface that teleports things at an atomic level then this problem would rip apart the cube into atoms.A wormhole connects two places at once seamlessly like a doorway, atoms are not being teleported in any way, space has just been folded onto itself and a tunnel was created to connect the two spatial planes.The difference with a conventional doorway is that this door has two doorways, but at the same time its one doorway.If the current laws of physics are true then "B" is the only possible answer. The doorway moving towards the cube is the same as all of space moving towards the doorway, the doorway doesnt really move cos its just a fixture connecting two points of spacetime. When whatever passes through the doorway it maintains its momentum on the other side, which is not moving (or rather moving with space in opposition to the other side of the doorway).
>>14506587Einstein BTFO!
>>14502850The problem with this thing is the fact that a wormhole wouldn't be attached to a surface like that, and it wouldn't be capable of being "moved" like thatA wormhole connects two points like the anon above said but he got it wrong, wormholes are like blackholes, they warp space around them, they cant be attached to a wall or something like in Portal, they would simply warp space around itSo the problem is impossible because it could never physically happen, you couldn't have a moving wormhole while the other side of the same wormhole was stationary because space is relativeIts just not possible
>>14502850Neither because both require laws of physics to be broken.A requires the cube to be moved without having momentum and B requires the cube to gain momentum from nothing.
>>14507537Actually let me clarify a bit what I said at the end thereWormholes are theoretically made up of matter called exotic matter and if that matter is moving then the wormhole moves too, I'm not an expert on wormhole theory (and its all bullshit, exotic matter is probably bullshit), but it doesnt seem logical for one "end" of a wormhole to be able to be moved without the space warping on either "side" of the wormhole being moved too, if you push it on one side it should move on the other side too so the spacetime warping remains consistent, if it becomes inconsistent I imagine it would simply collapse into a blackholeAlso if you did put something through the wormhole, even though its effectively the same thing as just passing through regular space, its velocity wouldn't be the same at the other "side" due to gravity. It would certainly have a change in velocity, so if A did happen it wouldnt just plop on the ground, it would accelerate to a certain degree.
Science should just be renamed science fiction, there is no difference between those.
>>14505787disinformation shill diverting attention from real people and economy to vague "joos"
>>14505864disinformation shill promoting germ theory degeneracy
>>14505051most people who brosse 4chin don't have a college education
>>14506150meds
>>14506302
This is pretty mind blowing. If you would shrink down the universe so that the earth was about the size of a water molecule, the Milky Way galaxy would be 12 miles across.
>>14505588What's that?
If you made all the water molecules the size of the milky way, it'd be a right time trying to take a sip.
>>14505384>If everything is a lot smaller, a large distance becomes a smaller distance.>Mine blow
>>14507530its a new molecule made of metal and boron
>>1450755612 miles is not that small though
/sci/ meme thread
>>14507552>that picI basically agree with the message, but the tone is nauseating. It just screams "I'm a midwit and I've never had sex".
Why people scared of spiders and bug but not lobster and crab?
>>14507368For me it's centipedes, the creepiest invertebrates.
Lobsters have the courtesy of remaining under water, and not generally where people are wading. Land crabs can be unnerving.
Crabs trigger my arachnophobia a little bit. The main thing that makes me feel comfortable with them is that they're delicious. It's hard to be afraid of something you know is going to be your poop soon
>>14507368you can't eat bugs, no evolutionary incentive not to run away from them
>>14507489>you can't eat bugs
Are people who have conflicting beliefs mentally unsound? Are they unfit to be allowed in public unchaperoned? Is the government willfully endangering the general public by allowing the insane to roam free? Should science put an end to the practice of allowing mentally ill people to roam free where they will inevitably cause problems for innocent normal decent people? Can science put an end to the practice? If science can't, or won't, then who can and will?
>>14506629Yeah cause your government created the classification as either white or non-hispanic white on fasfa forms, census data, etc.. No Mexican actually wants to list themselves as white but they are forced to.
>>14506862>No Mexican actually wants to list themselves as white but they are forced to.why are Mexicans listing themselves anywhere outside of mexico? mexico must suck balls if everyone wants to leave it. those losers ruined one county an now they want to mess up another one.
>>14506862>t. i've never been to mexico
>>14507540why would anyone in their right mind want to go to mexico? to enjoy the violent crime, poverty and ignorance?
>>14506280>Are people who have conflicting beliefs mentally unsound?The spectrum goes between having consistent but completely outlandish and untenable beliefs, and having a bunch of inconsistent but pragmatic beliefs that work under the right circumstances. There is no one on the left end of the spectrum, though plenty of people are imbalanced in that direction, embodying worst of both worlds. Being on the right side only becomes a problem when you try to formalize and systematize your ad hoc beliefs into some kind of weird Escherian mental structure, because then it starts to dictate your logic of behavior and becomes resistant to change. This truth that makes pseuds seethe.
Imagine stealing the hard work of others, making up a bunch of axiomatic, unproven garbage as "work" then saying that everybody owes everything to science and scientists.
>is X the jewsNo. >>>/pol/
>>14505043pic is pretty accurate
>>14505055>oh no, someone is stating the truth about jews on the internet
why are experimental predictions of old aether theory laundered into proofs of spacetime physics?
>>14507233>possibly poignant:>>When the newton's cradle is activated, the first ball cannot transfer it's energy into the second ball any faster or slower...maybe, because they are touching.... If you hit the first one with a baseball bat or gently touched it with your finger, it would be imparted with more or less energy, but that more or less energy would be transfered at the same rateIs this true?
Without fully largely deeply understanding the most fundamental fundamentals of the variables and objects and mechanisms relavant to such theories, making complex thoughts and theories on convoluted circumstances levels above fundamentals, is likely shoddy, sketchy, shady, and lacking. Most of the trouble, the mysteries, the contradictions, the errors, the the theories not working, the absurdities, the shambles; Is building and speaking about complex convoluted topics and phenomenon, levels above fundamental foundations of realities physics, without closely enough grasping the total existence of the ways and possible ways of the foundations and fundamentals of reality.
>>14507364According to your theory, how does charge physically work, how does magnetism physically work?
>>14507387>>light is the medium>And yet is only defined by what the medium does. It is not the medium, it's action. As real as a shadow.Water waves are the medium of water, sound waves are the medium of air. Light waves are the medium of light.
>>14507453>Hence the angles being talked about being the E and B fields of the wave. This is the movement being talked,Imagine a cubic box with a bunch of ball bearings in it perfectly packed in. You can touch touch the balls on one open side of the box, and the other sides have detectors and everything;You take a hammer and eye up a random ball around the middle of the open side.One time you hit it gently, then medium strength, then full strength, after waiting like 20 seconds in between hits. The energy wave the ball you hit with the hammer will be different energy levels depending on the force/accleration of your hit, yes? Will that energy propagate from ball to ball at the same velocity each trial hit? Will the energy wave be of the same nature traveling the direction of your hammer swing, as opposed to up and down perpendicular to it?
>it's just random mutations bro!
>>14507147Shit thread, mods delete pls
>>14507155Mods, spare OP. Anon here is a hyperfaggot
>>14507147Looks pretty evolved to me.
>intelligent design
I believe that physics is both local and non-local. Rather than a property inherent to physics, I believe this is a property of the environment. Stated accurately, I believe that our universe utilizes both localized and geometric expressions of physical phenomena.These beliefs are presented for the sake of completion, they are not required to test my hypothesis. The specific math present in the universe involves "zeroes collection" at the edge of discrete phenomena, which are used to paint higher order laws such as conservation of mass and energy. We can explore the full implications of this model later, for now there is an alluring hypothesis we should probably focus on.According to my models, natural phenomena have a dissipation rate (due to the unstructured environment) in the mathematics of vibration that are purely virtual and offer no constraints to intentional resonance. Should this prove correct, it may be possible to construct an environment where the resulting waveforms produce an overunity in specific bands. The hypothesis I'd like to propose could provide us not with free energy, but a controlled, periodic surplus of measured energy ordered in a form we'll have to devise (since it otherwise wouldn't have occurred naturally). I'm certain that the math can produce overunity, but I don't have sufficient basis to predict how this would affect a given environment. I'm also not certain if the overplus could perform useful work in a system, but figured that we can at the very least discuss it.We should be able to construct a fairly trivial hypothesis for this.
>>14506463One could say I'm resonant in your hypothesis. I'm reminded of paper related, whose conclusion states that "We inhabit a 3D hologram, embedded in an infinitely-dimensioned imaginary hyperspace. Matter, forces and energy emerge from the geometry and curvature of this complex spacetime. The bedrock foundation of the entire universe is multi-dimensional mathematics." In it quotes Maxwell's (actual apostrophe, unlike the gibbs heaviside equations masquerading beneath his name)>“The peculiarity of our space is that of its three dimensions, none is before or after another. As is ‘x’, so is ‘y’, and so is ‘z’. If you have 4 dimensions, this becomes a puzzle. For first, if three of them are in our space, then which three? Also, if we lived in space of ‘m’ dimensions, but were only capable of thinking ‘n’ of them, then first, which ’n’ ? Second, if so, things would happen requiring the rest to explain them, and so we should either be stultified or made wiser. I am quite sure that the kind of continuity which has four dimensions all co-equal, is not to be discovered by merely generalising Cartesian space equations.” — James Clerk Maxwell, in correspondence with C.J. Monro, Esq., 15Mar 1871[2] If , such a hypothesis is to be taken at face value, than the informationalists obviously have explications, for if entropy is conserved riding a non-commutative or non-associative shortcut through hyperspace than nature may well be performing it.(1/x) catcha: x4G0D
>>14506558I consider the natural dissipation of charge density into the environment, especially from a geometric algebra perspective that charge density is a current flowing not in L but in T. Charge density, as one is aware by the mass-energy relation, coincides with gravitation, or perhaps mathematically, the re-geometerization of the environment. such theorizing's lead me to consider electrons, or perhaps wider varieties of subatomic particles (I'm still filtered by Cohl Furey's bioctonion stuff https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_E2iiuunK-E&ab_channel=QuantaMagazine) are like self recursive warp bubbles of charge. the electro and magnetostatic forces dissipate, but the concentration of charge density warps the environment back in on itself. I believe this analog to be equivalent of the model inhttps://www.slideshare.net/LarryReed15/fine-structure-constant-250303032where the apparent charge of the electron is dissipating equal to a Casimir vacuum effect generated by the frame dragging of electrostatic forces inside the particle. When i was greeter with your idea of looking for zeros, my mind jumped here for some reason
>>14506558My basic problem with holographic models like that is their capacity to model (and predict) literally anything. They don't give us bearing in hyperspace, so we're forced to construct arbitrary submodels to create predictive domains in. Collating so many models is what led to my current understanding, which was mostly just looking for correlations in hyperspace (like most theoretical intuitions).>>14506593>some reasonThat's correct. All of physics necessarily occurs along the charge density gradient, and vacuum is one of the zero edges. These subtle effects at the edge of definition are precisely where the math needs to be examined most for us to gain a dimensional bearing that isn't imaginary (or holographic, if that's clearer).Resonant effects wouldn't be noticed in a holographic universe because it lacks the compounding texture of material physics.
you can cry to the jannies all you want, it doesn't change the fact that this is >>>/x/ tier garbage "science" based on feels and insanity.this board sucks ass, but i'll call out quack bullshit when i see it.
>>14507342I'm open to criticism or I wouldn't post. You're welcome to explain how you come to your conclusions, because the same is expected of me.
