I've been thinking about >>>/g/83557014 since reading it the other night and it has me wondering. The idea of an alternate history that's different from the one we experience led me to thinking about how we would disprove this theory 250 years from now, and I kinda realized, if you can simulate a human, you can run an android. From there it was a question about the appearance of immortality and snowballed into which families are most likely to be androids in hiding when we assume that the singularity actually happened like 800 years ago.Supposing that any one of us can't disprove literally every time period other than the one preceding such developments, when would be the ideal time to start auditing very old and established families on the grounds that they might secretly be non-living parasites?
Hmm... Why is sharing an action previewing service with humans the best idea we've ever had?
>>13731546
Just proved intuition to myself. Not sure what this means. Do people need a formal method of studying the implications of free will?
>>13751433Can't believe how obvious this is in retrospect.
Right, I completely forgot where I am.TL;DR: When is the right time to react in the event of a robot takeover?
> I constantly have to do rituals and repeat my actions in order to make an intrusive thought disappear> My OCD recently became very severe> The pain is unbearable, I cannot live normallyWhen I try to ignore these intrusive thoughts, it feels so painful. I feel like I am getting a heart attack. I cannot distinguish what is real or not anymore, I am psychologically destroyedWhat should I do?
>>13772704I had really bad OCD, to the point it was 16 hours some days of non-stop rituals. Honestly not sure how I didn't off myself, tried literally every solution possible, multiple meds, multiple psychs, a few weeks in the hospital, ect.What eventually cured me was doing Ayahasuca, probably the worst experience of my life but I would do it again in a heart beat as it completely cured my ocd and made me realize what a joke the modern psychiatry system is.
>>13772767>>13772866There's nothing you can do to prevent contamination, it's a losing battleA few of that woman's skin cells would have gotten on your food even if she didn't touch itGerms are everywhere and if there was a curse then it would have happened alreadyJust accept that nothing is permanent and nothing is perfect in this world
>>13773970He is talking about spiritual corruption you souless brainlet
I know that feel anon, I was at my worst as a young teen and it had gotten slightly better as I've gotten older. But I still have my OCD in the form of mental loops, intrusive thoughts (which also form into thought loops) and physical tics. I hate it so much I just wish it was gone. I'm also mad when I see people online who use ocd as a quirky illness when they clearly don't have it.
>>13772704https://www.cognitivebehavioralcenter.com/choice-Read this, might help, it puts OCD in perspective.
Just stop questioning the studies, chud
>>13773789169 percent of studies can ligma
>>13774457what's ligma
Let me guess, you "need" more?
>>13773789Then build the machines/system that sucks the CO2 out of the environment and effectively controls the climate. Oh wait, you can’t even answer the question of who gets to control that system LMAO.
>>13773789I'm more concerned who's responsible for 1%. Alien?
>full blown AIDS
>>13773652Ich readen doishe nicht.You are low on the T?
>>13773652What does it mean?
>>13774499it's working
>>13773652Why do people do this shit?Thread with just a picture, all the words in the picture are Arabic, no context given except some random claim with zero proof it's even real
What's the point of this?In Canada, 18 people from ages 0-19 died from COVID-19 over 2 years. Majority of them were kids on the verge of death. Not to mention, they were on the older side of 10+ as well.More kids from 0-10 die from falling, in car accidents, and drowning individually than this.Why do kids have to be vaccinated?
>>13765454Imagine fucking up your kids' systems possibly for life for a fucking flu that wouldn't kill them unless they were already unhealthy fat fucks.
So this is essentially what we're seeing here. It works similar to many other stories involving their fraud. 1) Pay a bunch of shills to keep repeating the line that it's safe and effective, even when it's not. When new data comes out, just crank up the propaganda to eleven. 2) Call any who aren't shills misinformers, blame them for intentionally spreading the disease for no reason. Also ignore everything that they actually says. 3) Wokeists love the narrative of progress and science and feeling relevant through the act of telling other people what to do / being able to force other people to follow their leaders agenda, so they are all on board, even if it means there must be some "acceptable losses". 4) Roll in the money.
>>13765454have to protect the boomers who destroyed your civilization!
>>13771384>but really just media that encouraged the vaccine. Why is this acceptable. Shouldn't there advice be consult your doctor for everything?The media sells advertising to pharma companies that tell you to tell your doctor what to prescribe to you. The whole thing is backwards from how it should be.
>>13766262even if it wouldn't save a single one they'd still be happy someone had to die in their name
im currently puting together some research on improving the oxygen carrying abilities of blood. The current large limitation on human haemoglobin is that it requires to be in a red blood cell, only about 35% by volume of a red blood cell is haemoglobin, meaning if you made up the same hemocrit equivalent of cell free oxygen carrier's you'd increase blood oxygen carrying capacity 3x for the same volumetric serum displacement of blood without increasing viscosity, i currently plan on enhancing myself with Chromium ii substituted earth worm erythrocruorin, by my estimations my blood will be bright aqua while deoxygenated and a deep indigo while oxygenated
>>13771546There are only two possible outcomesAnaphylactic shock, or becoming picrelatedDo it
>>13771546When do you plan the first update ?Really looking forward to some results
>>13771546If this works I'll be the first in line for your new generation of worm-blood PEDs.
If you inject it into your dick it'll grow longer
>>13771976Faggot
Can anyone on /sci/ give a probable estimate of JWST's chance of failure, so I can manage my expectations.
>>13771402JWST was originally intended to have been launched in 2007, the program was already a disappointing failure more than a decade ago. The fact that they were unwilling admit that the original plan was unrealistic and cut their losses in 2007 and instead insisted on spending over 3000% of the original budget just to launch a decade and half late only multiplies the cringe factor. Because they wasted so much money and have a guilty conscience over it, we will now have to suffer through a decade of exaggerations and lies about the importance and significance of any data JWST might happen to gather.
>>13771402once it's on its way to L2, it might as well be as far away as the stars. also, the halo orbit requires is unstable and requires constant readjustment, and the telescope only has enough fuel for 10 years, with almost 0% chance of a refueling mission
Reminder that Galileo broke because it was stuck in storage for a long time.
>>13771410Correct answer right here.
100%
Scientifically speaking, what's the best way to track down and find treasure like treasure chests?
>>13770025Topkek.Are you a quant ? I am. And I don't do any maths.
>>13770894>>13772513Real analysis is not statistics.
>>13768179based
>>13768209so economics are the trannies of science?
>>13773345Not the only trannies but definitely biased.Seriously, which "scientists" wear suits and that go to Davos Switzerland to decide of the fate of the world ?Economic theories are not theories, they are politicies. And these policies make the weather. Monetary policies are god-like in their reach.Check out this :https://www.youtube.com/watchv=p5Ac7ap_MAY
Tell me something about geology.
>>13771012But the moon was made by a large asteroid colliding with earth... how could that possibly be true?
>>13763091Repost pl0x
>>13763091I remember something like there is only about 6000 minerals which combine themselves to form all the types of rock on Earth.Somewhat both a big number and a small number
I am an environmental geologist. Ama
>>13773022That's true. Not only mineral composition matters but physical processes such as heat, pressure, erosion & weathering, etc. Rocks can tell you a lot about how it was made and how it got there e.g. the difference between a conglomerate and a breccia.
And yes, Economics is a science.
>>13774389Name one Austrian "economist" that got the Nobel Price.
>>13774407Hayek.
>>13774389hasnt happened in a long time, for some reason everyone has moved forward!
>>13774389>nobel prize in economics>The award was established in 1968 by a donation from Sweden's central banklmfaoits not even a real nobel prize
>>13774411Huh? Which one?
What caused the atmosphere to rotate geosynchronously with the earth below?Did the earth slow down somehow?Is it possible the earth stands still while the sun rotates around?Where did life originate?Is it really possible for every complex part of a cell to be created by chance?Do all human cultures share a common origin as evidenced by many similar myths and language similarities?What evidence is there for the plate tectonics theory? Did the native Americans once live in great cities of which the impression still exist in unpopulated deserts?What evidence is there for the existence of photons?Is consciousness wholly created by the brain? What is really in Antarctica? Is space travel substantiated to be considered a hard science?Does Koko the gorilla have a soul?Can stories of reincarnation be dismissed as hoaxes? Have you ever seen a dish for satellite television pointed straight up?Will today's popular misinterpretations of events become tomorrows false history?How much of history is based on biased deceptive accounts? Was Tesla right?
>>13774398which one is his husband (female)?
>>13774440They're all the same person also susie is a girl and is a wife not a husband please stop derailing
>>13774445that boy looks like the wife to me
>>13774452common misconception Kris is a boy
>>13774460hed look good in a wedding dress and hes not doing any mans work with that puny girl body. this susie person looks much bigger than him and seems to be dominant over him, definitely the husband.
Started hobby collecting old books about 2 years ago, mainly classroom math/science/history books. Most of them are from 1800's - 1910. Quickly notice, despite the stilted writing style, it's much easier to understand concepts from these old books compared to their modern day equivalents. Information is concise, examples/explanations are not midwit word problems or analogys, amazing pictures and diagrams. My largest epiphany of how fucked books are hits me when I get hold of a 1800's medical book called "A text-book of human physiology" by Flint, Austin. It has amazing in-depth explanations and detailed gorgeous hand drawn diagrams, you can't find anything like this online or is most basic medical books.WTF happened? I realize information has been "dumbed-down" or even censored but still I never knew it was to such a great extent.Online Archive of "A text-book of human physiology": https://archive.org/details/textbookofhumanp00flinuoft/page/776/mode/2up
>>13770624>female writes "le insightful analysis" 100+ years out of date and pass when actually intelligent men were writing about itNot surprised
>>13773157>The Sokal AffairMidwit
>>13773544>epithet lmao at ur emotional outburst u mad
Before round earth propaganda
>>13772710So wait time dilation and relativity were invented to explain away this experiment?
Scientifically speaking, why are brown people obsessed with BLACKED?
What's the current science on sex/gender differences as far as nature goes?As a MtF who has interests which are exceptionally masculine even as far as men go, I've always been interested in this question but unfortunately I don't really understand statistics, biology or psychology so reading studies is a bit difficultI've noticed the following things1. the debate is mostly focused on ability rather than interest, so for example it's never about whether boys naturally like mathematics more but rather about whether boys are naturally better at mathematics, if a boy likes playing with a truck it's always put in the context of future careers with the implication that girls are somehow worse at engineering for example and so when they prove that girls are equally as good at mathematics and physics in school they dismiss the difference2. sometimes the fact that there are differences in interest and behaviour from a very early age is accepted but because the authors are so tunnel visioned on careers they dismiss these differences as being very small and essentially meaningless (probably just saying the same thing desu)I understand that there's definitely an additional factor in terms of interest vs ability, I doubt someone's ability would be affected by social factors beyond say, the access to practice but I find it hard to accept that if these researchers admit that from a very young age boys prefer playing with trucks compared to girls then the difference in interests in adolescence/adulthood is entirely nurtureIs the whole empathising-systemising theory still taken seriously today btw?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bTKRkmwtGY
>>13773387No. Why?
>>13773467Well why did you post something that's unrelated to this thread?
>>13770838I think "Masculine interests" has basis in biology, it has to, but has been tempered culturally over thousands of years. If boys and girls who had never heard of trucks before were put in a room with toy trucks I think the aesthetics of the truck would guide which one plays with it more.For something like maths I think neither really care about it more than the other innately but boys may be more attracted to what numbers can be associated with. I don't know if there's any research to back this but it's my hunch.>As a MtF If you wanted a serious thread you shouldn't have posted this. Why do women and trannies feel so compelled to announce "who they are" on an anonymous forum?Anyway, YWNBA, kys and all that. ciao
>>13774322So what research have you actually read?Have you read Simon Baron-Cohen?
