Why does ADHD conveniently only flare up when a "sufferer" happens to be faced with a task he doesn't want to do?
>>13751707>Why does ADHD conveniently only flare up when a "sufferer" happens to be faced with a task he doesn't want to do?You don't lose focus when you're trying to do something boring? ADHD just means that x10 If you lose focus for 0.1 second doing something fun, you would lose focus for 1 second with ADHD. If you lose focus for 5 seconds doing something boring, you would lose focus for 50 seconds with ADHDIs it that hard to believe? It's not rocket science
>>13751707Convincing children that there's something wrong with THEM for not wanting to participate in the most boring and redundant activity that society has ever created as a form of a scaled-up mass-producing version of the thing that should've never scaled further than just one-on-one mentorship, is probably one of the worst crimes against humanity out there. Certainly next to the fabrication of the holocaust.
Alright schizos are the meds destroying childrens' brains? long term amphetamines use can't be good for you. I've tried looking it up but all the studies I've found say "more research is needed" because they never actually look at childrens brains
>>13771636My parents put me on Ritalin at age 7 and I stayed on the drugs for about 15 years. No issues as far as I can tell.
>>13771636Therapeutic doses actually seem to normalize cognitive abnormalities according to the latest research. Lots of difference between a kid taking 10 mg of Ritalin and studying and some tweaker taking 5 grams of meth and staying up 3 days to masturbate.
The US FDA just released a health guideline to be issued in 2022 to promote and encourage healthy eating.This is an image of the "Food Compass" they released for easy understanding of which foods to consume more off or less of.Does this seem about right to you? How scientifically accurate would you say it is?
>>13771044> you vill eat ze bugz
>>13771678It's easy to find the real chart, but it's hardly any better.
>>13771048General Mills must have paid for the 'food compass' since its the only brand name mentioned along with Luck Charms. Imagine eating watermelon , canned peaches and Pineapple all day.
>it’s strictly tailored to health Heavy doubt
>>13771131nigger i can fry an egg in water
I think im going to major in computer science next year. How do I teach myself all the math ill need in a couple of months before i start school?
>>13766894Calc 3 is used extensively in machine learning, graphics and geometry processing, convex optimization, flight simulation, basically any part of CS that touches traditional engineering, computational physics, etc…Differential equations is used a lot in physical and biomedical modeling, yet again in graphics, numerical analysis, a decent portion of hash function design, computer vision, and many other things.The reason they don’t require it is likely a mix of two things:1) “core” computer science starts with discrete mathematics. The collection of topics are both insanely extensive, applicable, and more easily motivated by immediate payoff. Enumerative combinatorics already does so much in CS.2) related to the above, combinatorics uses calculus and analysis quite extensively for generating functions, but in general these problems are too hard for most undergrad CS and engineering majors *without* more focus on theory and math. If you don’t believe me, look at the average calc 2 grade.3) enough people get a CS degree who just want to know how to write boiler plate code and use no math that they don’t make it a requirement, since they don’t really want to do “CS.” I’m willing to bet enough people complained that they dropped the calc 3 requirement.TL;DR a relatively small amount of CS students want to do shit that requires calculus, so they either ask you to *at least* minor in math or straight up teach you the relevant calculus in the relevant course. Ironically, they expect you to know the full gamut of calculus (and some analysis) before you hit grad school, otherwise you’re behind.
>>13768685I searched for a calculus 3 curriculum after reading this post because I was curious, turns out I already learned about a 3rd of this stuff during my graphics course
>>13759614>i'm confusedwhy?
>>13753193irrationally based
>>13752892bumped
Do you ever think about how empty space really is? Even the closest things to us are millions of miles away. In between them is quite literally nothing but the blackness of space itself.
>>13772622why does blackness bother you so much?
how do I synthesize adderall at home?
>>13770637There are loads of nootropics you should try first>l theanine and caffeine>nicotine>bacopa monneiri
>>13770637Google it brah 1rst result
>>13770637glowing af
>>13770637total syntheses of amphetamine is trivial and left as an exercise to the reader.
>>13772574This but unironically
what are the real solutions to [math] x^2 + 1 = 0 [/math]
>>13771034i
>>13771034
>>13771111>>13771539Stop making up shit, that is obviously not real
>>13771039Finite fields are not subfields of R, so those are not real solutions.
>>13772472yes, its imaginary
Assuming some worst case climate change scenario that destroys all of our agriculture, or some nuclear war that forces humans to live deep underground, could we really survive off things like bugs and algae or sea kelp or stuff like that?Please don't argue whether or not it would be pleasant, I just want to know if all of our nutrients are covered
once the communists have stolen all property, people will only have each other left over to eat
Hypothetically, and I don't guarantee your safety, how much easier would it be for you to sustain fusion if provided with a magical containment field that doesn't require physical energy to operate continuously?
>>13750324It might be possible to post a screenshot. Haven't been able to isolate an epistemology on this yet.
>>13738836To serious people I mean. If you can actually create something that safely contains the energy of an active fusion process, with no material to act as a conduit for the containment field, we should be able to measure it. By any real standard this would prove magic of some kind.
>>13730848is that wall from something?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2vuMLg6BHE&t=10
>>13770597Probably not. The image was selected to captivate and redirect the ambient energy from your imagination to a magical world where a reactor can operate safely. I want to minimize risk of an ecological hazard between that world and our own.
- VAERS published 726,963 adverse events, including 15,386 deaths as of September 17, 2021- CDC fraud expert says that number of deaths is at least five times, and possibly ten times higher- A whistleblower from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Service (CMS) revealed how almost50,000 people died from the injections. They represent only 20% of the U.S. population, meaningthat if this data is applied to the entire population 250,000 have died- 150,000 reports have been rejected or scrubbed by the VAERS system- The actual number of anaphylaxis is 50 to 120 times higher than claimed by the CDC- Everyone who dies before two weeks after the second injection, is not considered a vaccinedeath, which causes the majority of early vaccine deaths to be ignored- Moderna received over 300,000 reports of adverse events in only three months-time- The Lazarus Report shows that only 1% of adverse events is being reported by the public- The majority of the population is not aware of the existence of systems where they can reportvaccine adverse events- Aggressive censorship and propaganda told the public that adverse events are rare, causingpeople to not understand how their health problems stem from past injections- The shaming and blaming of medical professionals who say anything against the vaccines, causemany in the medical community to avoid reporting adverse events- The fear of being held accountable after administering an injection that killed or disabledpatients, further prevents medical personnel from reporting it- Having accepted financial incentives to promote, and administer the covid vaccines, also stopsComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>13772122>>there could be a system of confidence intervals for each report, like if you typed your full name and vaccine registry it would be more trustworthyAnon, even if you fill out a name etc, who's to stop you from lying from that point onward? It's the exact same reason for why you can't use VAERS to make inferences about adverse events due to vaccines, except now it runs on chain.
>>13772319>Anon, even if you fill out a name etc, who's to stop you from lying from that point onwardA social credit system
>>13772357>literally chinaanon I don't
>>13771118Had me going until transhumanism baby with pitch black eyes
>millions of sore armsthis is literally bill gates
Why do so many drugs have "suicidal thoughts" as a side effect?
>>13772119Based, I have come to the same conclusion completely independently of you.
Because you enter your most natural state and realize that your consciousness can survive outside your physical body and it needs to be freed.
>>13772133baste. it just makes sense, fren.
>>13770901They usually list any observed effect even if they aren't sure their product caused it.If you consider the rates of depression in the general population then you would expect "suicidal thoughts" to show up in any reasonably sized study.If you consider the subset of the population that willingly subjects itself to testing in exchange for money, I'd bet the depression rate is higher than in the general population.There's little to no cost for them to list it (notice they already soften it from "suicide" or "suicide attempts" to "suicidal thoughts") but there is potentially a huge legal cost if they don't.Even if their product doesn't cause it, it is up to the unpredictable legal system to decide in the case it isn't listed.Also, they don't know what subset of the afflicted population will be using their product so any dissimilarity from the test population may (falsely) indicate there is an effect (willingness in the afflicted population to use the product may be correlated with suffering/despair/depression/insecurity/gullibility/poverty and they don't know ahead of time how their marketing strategy will bias the sample of people who choose to use the product).Most of the time they are just covering their own ass.
>>13770901people do drugs because they are unsatisfied with the reality they're living in. people who are unsatisfied with the reality they're living in tend to commit suicide in order to scape that unsatisfactory reality.
Regardless of you treat your own data, I think we all recognize that building large genotype-phenotype databases is essential for the future of medicine and forensics. ITT we list ideas that would get people to submit their genetic and phenotypic info. I’ll start. 1. Sperm bank - good way to get full genotype and phenotype of applicants, can turn a profit as you go, but it doesn’t scale well at all. 2. Gimmicky dating site - could do a few things here. Some that come to mind are letting people compare genes, or adding a badge to your profile if you carry gene ‘x’ or something, idk. Could also show you the potential phenotypic range of offspring between you and a match. This doesn’t feel like a great idea. I feel like it could work though, especially since women might use it. 3. Pay them for it. They have the data and they aren’t making any money off of it, may as well make some. These are my shitty ideas. Now share yours.
>>13772438I'm sorry bro its inferior to the sedentary breeding whale - regular sized male combo. The women exist purely to pump out children while the men do everything else
>>13772449Then why not just make the males smaller so you can have more?I don't see that society beating the AFSM one
>>13772447Wait desu doesn't become desu anymore?
>>13772455Because they need to be able to reach the top shelves without a step stool
>>13772463Lmao I can't argue with that
/sci/ if two or more men are masturbating together on the internet while pretending to be little girls, then does that scientifically constitute homosexual behavior or is it not scientifically gay since they might believe that their internet sex parters are genuine underaged females?
>>13772175>they're both jerking off at the idea of women.if your idea of a woman is a man pretending to be a cartoon character then you are a faggot
if only you had a healthy normal early teenage upbringing where you and your heterosexual friends had fap nights. Sitting in the living room around the TV with one of your Dad's porn dvds on, boldly fapping in unison without a hint of bashful body language or worrying about who finishes first or last. You'd have turned out straight as an arrow too, instead of asking guarded questions about whether it's OK to pretend you're a pedo instead of being gay on the 4chans
>>13772256>You'd have turned out straight as an arrow too
>>13772256just instinctively everyone knowing what the appropriate minimum physical distance from each other without saying a word. Separate chairs were ideal, but in a pinch the settee was fine. If anyone had a splash accident, which was rare, just wiped it off and got on with the show. No big deal, no words needed, no fucks given.. just a group of boys with a healthy heterosexual orientation forming and blooming.
>>13772294Of course, with up to 6 guys in the room, statistically over enough a long enough time, eye contact may be made - just by sheer chance.Most of the time it was brushed off, treated with as much apathy and nonchalance as a splash from here, or over there. Very occasionally though, the lads sometimes had a bit of friendly competition going as an aside to the main event. A staredown during the fap night. First one break eye contact/look away loses this little side game. You know how it is, young men with rising T levels don't want to lose a competition even if it was extremely rare. Heh just an anecdote: apart from my adult life as a Kinsey Scale 0 male, I think there was a small unintended further benefit from those nights as a young cis-male.I didn't get too involved in the staredown stuff, most of us were getting down to business at a very appropriate distance away from each other in front of the TV. But, like most of the lads, I did have a bit of a friendly rivalry going with one kid there. He had a very square chin, and a heavy set angled jawline.. as well as curiously symmetrical and high cheekbones.. and striking eyebrows and..... Anyway I perfected this stare strategy, I ended up calling it the AlphaDestroyer as I never lost a staredown with it. Never affected my fapping either. A few years later in secondary school, I started getting bullied a bit. All I had to do was get close in this wannabe bully's face and hit him with my AlphaDestroyer staredown and it scared him away pronto. I think my T levels were permanently increased after perfecting that during eye contact at fap night. Sounds weird but I also get a strange twitch in my pants when.................................................................................................
What's infinity minus infinity
Symbol - Symbol = 0.>>13771000Yes but not the infinity which contains all infinities. Omega symbol.
[math]\infty - \infty = \lim_{n \to \infty} n - \lim_{n \to \infty}(n+1/2) = \lim_{n\to \infty} (n - (n+ 1/2)) = \lim_{n\to \infty}-1/2 = -1/2[/math]
>>13757653ok no because observe foolinfinity = 2 * infinitylet infinity = xx = 2x1 = 2???am I to believe that this BREAKS the laws of the universe??? hmm..? you foolish boy go back to the books
>>13771047But [math]\omega^\omega[/math] is not contained in [math]\omega.[/math]
>>13772207He probably means capital Omega. Haven't heard of it for that purpose, but he seems to define it as the class of all infinite sets, or at least infinite cardinals.
Google says "as fast as 3 months" but I fucking had them for years as a kid and they never got to the nerves. I only had them removed as a teenager and not even because of any pain or chewing problems or any inconveniences at all.Are dentists lying jews?
>word salad>hates JewsYWNBAW
>>13772130read the book "cure tooth decay" by ramiel nagelno need to thank me, just share if it helps you
>>13772130A very large dose of "it depends" is the boring answer to your question OP. If you got typical tooth-meets-tooth surface caries, associated with insufficient flossing, then they can go kinda fast. 3 months can be the difference between a standard filling and a root canal + crown.Flat surface "mountain dew mouth" type caries, associated with too much sugar drinks, actually progresses slower, but I would still recommend fixing as soon as possible because it becomes very hard to get an esthetic outcome fast.
>>13772130cute bunny
Anecdotally, I have gotten significantly "dumber" since I abandoned learning new things and solving math problems, as in overall I feel like I have become stupid as a result. Does evidence exist around this concept because it is almost as though your brain stops "valuing" memory and intellect once you stop training it in that way.
>get older and become dumber (as all old people inevitably do)>cope that your intelligence dropped because you stopped learning, and not the other way around
>>13770181>old people are dumb>thats why they have all the money and political power
>>13772090>literally defending Jews
>>13770159>evidence that learning mathematical concepts can improve intelligence?What mathematical concepts?
