Why are engineers chuddy af?
>>16130032>"diversity" = "things that I like"
>>16133406Thats how the white genocide scheme works. They make up a million lies and excuses in order to get their way all while constantly whittling away until one day the genocide is complete
>>16122204NPR claims to represent a balanced representation of the different political ideologies.100% of the editorial staff belongs to the Democratic Party.
>>16134125Whereas when whites want to genocide people they just start putting them into camps. Once again whites are just so much better huh
>>16134150Every single Republican is unbalanced
Is the moon really a planet thats made of gas? Have the scientists been lying to us all along?
>>16132162feigning ignorance is a standard technique to stifle conversation. Gaslighting, if you will
>>16132162>>16132192What do the points on the graph measure?
>>16129075>They're put there by even more retarded electorates.That belief is popular because it plays into your desire to see yourself as more intelligent than everyone else, but the truth is that elections are entirely fake. The reported vote totals are made up in order to justify the results that desired.
>>16132932When Bush Jr. replaced paper ballots with soience voting machines after the 2000 election, that was the formal end of any possibility of having votes counted accurately. With all electronic voting systems faking the results is so easy and foolproof because there is no long any paper trail to worry about.
>>16134104>there is no long any paper trailTHIS.Basically one person gets to say "That person won" and there is no way to refute the claim.It is IMPOSSIBLE for there to be an independent check of the voting system.
How common is this type of behavior amongst homosexuals? Has science ever studied this topic? And why do they do it?
>>16129527>ViceYou are only proving OP'a hypothesis.
>>16129527Saved, to show others how fucked in the head you are to think this is anything but proof of your absolute retardation, faggot ass.
>>16130231Pick a country. Any country, right now.
>>16129368>Has science ever studied this topic?Entomophagy and Coprophagy in Undifferentiated Schizophreniahttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3168083/Coprophagia or the ingestion of feces, considered to be a variant of pica, has been associated with medical disorders like seizure disorders, cerebral atrophy, and tumors and with psychiatric disorders like mental retardation, alcoholism, depression, obsessive compulsive disorder, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, fetishes, delirium, and dementia. But entomophagy or the practice of eating live or dead insects as food by humans has only been reported as part of eating habits by some cultures in the world and not in association with any medical or neuropsychiatric disorders. Till date, there is no report in medical literature of entomophagy as an association with any neuropsychiatric or medical illnesses. Coprophagy and entomophagy has not been together reported as well. We describe the first ever case report of a 19-year- old male patient diagnosed with undifferentiated schizophrenia and associated with both entomophagy and coprophagy. His schizophrenic symptoms, the entomophagic, coprophagic behaviors improved with olanzapine therapy. Entomophagy and coprophagy, two very unusual human behaviors, can be seen in association with schizophrenia.
Prove the Pythagorean theorem without using a circular argument. That means no trigonometry, brainlets.
Just goes to show that people who study math are as smart as African high school girls
>>16131221>i is perpendicular from reals>1 line is horizontal>i line is vertical>i length is perpendicular to vertical>i length is horizontal>distance from the two ends of the two horizontal lines is 0It works
>>16123455Nothing is gained from from the simplistic.
>>16123455Trangles
>>16132351
where did the lie that CO2 is bad for the planet come from?
>>16132206If the local weather data set is 90 years old then you'll have record high temperatures 4 times a year
>>16132919How come meteorologists and "climate experts" don't mention statistical realities like this whenever record X is used as proof for why we need to reduce our carbon footprint by not having children ie laying down and rotting.
>>16132195>10^4 knots^2What kind of energy is this??
>>16133216air mass movement
>>16123798>CO2 is bad for the planetIt's not, the planet keeps going, one mass extinction after another, this is just the 6th. Global warming will be, and is already being bad for us.
Suppose I have an accomplice who is the head of the government of a country. We both decide to privatise the central bank of that nation and become its sole shareholders by changing the constitution. (i) What will the rich/oligarchs of that country do as I am certain they will not abide by this decision: 1. Now that I can literally print money to buy shares in their companies on the stock exchange. 2. Buy government bonds/debts. 3. Loan money to the government. (ii) Are there any bad repercussions to this?
>>16132426>>16132548>>1613304fucked that up
>>16132548Economics isn't that complicated take the first 3 digits of the national debt. Example. 100. And add 10% 3 or 4 times. 1. 100+10= 110.2. 110+11= 121. 3. 121+ 12.1= 133.14. 133.1+ 13.3=146.4And the national debt in 4 years will be 133.1-146.4 national debt is that simplistic.
Public/private is a legal fiction like that of civilian/not civilian. Made up to distinguish between government/not goverrnment. Doesnt really mean much.If some evil supervillain took over a country a la general zod, you'd not care if he called himself a public figure or just a private person that rules everything.Literally just a label.
>>16133197True. But historically, there existed other legal fictions which made such distinctions intelligible.
>>16133224those distinctions only maintain their existence as long as they serve their function as a coercion tool.
"Up to 50% of patients with cannabis-related psychotic symptoms presenting to the ED requiring hospitalization will go on to develop schizophrenia. "https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.640222/full"Cannabis is involved in approximately 50% of psychosis, schizophrenia, and schizophreniform psychosis cases"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3927252/"In one recent study that followed nearly 2,000 teenagers as they became young adults, young people who smoked marijuana at least five times were twice as likely to have developed psychosis over the next 10 years as those who didn’t smoke pot.""One of the best-known studies followed nearly 50,000 young Swedish soldiers for 15 years. Those who had smoked marijuana at least once were more than twice as likely to develop schizophrenia as those who had never smoked pot. The heaviest users (who said they used marijuana more than 50 times) were 6x as likely to develop schizophrenia as the nonsmokers."https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/teens-who-smoke-pot-at-risk-for-later-schizophrenia-psychosis-201103071676"1/5th of cases of schizophrenia among young males might be prevented by averting [Cannabis Use Disorder]"https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/psychological-medicine/article/association-between-cannabis-use-disorder-and-schizophrenia-stronger-in-young-males-than-in-females/E1F8F0E09C6541CB8529A326C3641A68Daily weed use was associated with increased odds of psychotic disorder compared with never users, increasing to nearly 5x increased odds for daily use of high-potency types of cannabis. The PAFs calculated indicated that if high-potency cannabis were no longer available, 12% of cases of first-episode psychosis could be prevented across the 11 sites, rising to 30% in London and 50% in Amsterdamhttps://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpsy/article/PIIS2215-0366(19)30048-3/fulltext
>>16132773If the experience led you to remove marijuana from your life, it is negative by definition.
>>16132776removing a "zero" experience from a set is a positive by definition, as it increases the overall average.
>>16132783Which means that the experience itself was an overall negative that lowered your overall average experiences enough to drive you to entirely remove it from all of your future experiences.
>>16132731The people who promote it do so because they are drug addicts that are trying to rationalize their addictions
>>16115347Reality can't literally slip away. It's a metaphor that blames somebody for a disagreement. If it's interpersonal, the disagreement starts with unhackneyed figurative language, and they can't be bothered to understand.
F
Literally who
>>16133971>Da Costa's international recognition came especially through his work on paraconsistent logic and its application to various fields such as philosophy, law, computing, and artificial intelligence.[2] He is one of the founders of this non-classical logic.[3] In addition, he constructed the theory of quasi-truth that constitutes a generalization of Alfred Tarski's theory of truth, and applied it to the foundations of science.https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton_da_Costa
Newton has been dead for centuries
which map projection is /sci/ approved?
>>16133274a table is kind of inconvenient to wrap around a globe
>>16132779>bro here's your planet to exist on it's so autistic it can't be accurately represented in 2dfucking creator...
>>16132779plate carree
>>16133274Do you not have a phone?
Gall-Peters is the only equitable projection
Will academia get better or worse as time goes on? If worse, what should intelligent people do?
>>16126696>0.00001% most intelligent>excludes 99% of /sci/That actually speaks really highly of /sci/.
>>16128771This.Academia is for midwits
>>16126163>what should intelligent people do?they should be intelligent to figure that out for themselves
>>16132115intelligent people already understand that academia is for midwits
>>16126696>research institutions will always hire the 0.00001% most intelligent portion of the populationnope, they hire the most compliant because they want obedient employees
New cultist cope just dropped
>>16132645I'm American. Our Arabs live north of us. They'll flee into Canada if anywhere.
>>16132488>Yes. Yes I haveYour phrasing indicates you're lying, as does your lack of specific example.
>>16124115And.Nothing,Of.Value.is. Lost.
>>16129400None of the predictions that they have made have ever come true. If science has predictive power then """climate science""" isn't science, its just something that dishonestly uses the word "science" in it's name to confuse people and trick into thinking its legitimately scientific
>>16124104>statesGeographical expressions really
you couldn't have accomplished what they did
>>16130000You should swipe my massive Jewish fists into your head while you're at it
>>16130000
>>16112119you got it backwards
>>16132133If negroes could read they'd be offended at what you posted.
>>16087022soientists don't create useful inventions, the idea that they do is just a myth. soientists publish replication crisis articles in journals nobody reads, they don't have any useful skills
Is Coca Cola really a healthier beverage than milk?
>>16091579>Is Coca Cola really a healthier beverage than milk?No, its not, maybe water is healthier than milk but there is no fucking way a beverage with twice the daily intake free sugars is healthier than milk.
>>16091579Coca Cola can clean the acid off of battery hookups, let that sink in before you think any further.
>>16091821You got so fucking wrecked, never post here ever ever again.
All of you coke faggots I challenge you: Boil coca cola on a pan and be sure to view how much sugar is left behind.
>>16132883At least its useful for something
NOAA admits that CO2 is not a greenhouse gas and has no effect on the climate. According to NOAA:>The amount of CO2 in the atmosphere today is comparable to around>4.3 million years ago, when sea level was about 75 ft higher than today,>the average temp was 7 degrees F higher than in pre-industrial times, &>large forests occupied areas of the Arctic that are now tundra. Which is to say that even though CO2 is the same now as it was 4.3 million years ago, the climate today is far, far different and much colder than it was 4.3 million years ago and this is because atmospheric CO2 levels have no effect or undetectably little effect on the Earth's climate. Its also worth noting that atmospheric CO2 levels have been substantially above where they have been in the recent past for over 100 years now and there has been no substantial change in the climate during that time, which only further proves NOAA's assertion that CO2 doesn't affect the Earth's climate and that CO2 is not a meaningful greenhouse gas.
>>16128609everywhere on the planet warms up during the day and cools off at night. if CO2 were a greenhouse gas then the reduced rate of cooling at night due to CO2 would be measurable. instead it still cools off at night, just as much as ever, because CO2 is not a greenhouse gas
>>16130867A lie is not a non sequitur my nigger
>>16132913It is in this case.
>>16117641Thats quite a change, I wonder what it was that finally made them come around?
>>16117641>and this is because atmospheric CO2 levels have no effect or undetectably little effect on the Earth's climateno, it's notthis fucking board, sigh
Good news everyone, Arctic ice accumulation is above average for this time of year compared to the average for this century so far. Seems like the global warming doomsday scenarios that so many scientists have been predicting aren't coming true, isn't that great news? I know you're ecstatic to hear it, especially the people who are so concerned about the environment, they should be extra happy to see this good news.
>>16089049Global warming isn't real
>>16134102Retard take
>>16073486>Seems like the global warming doomsday scenarios that so many scientists have been predicting aren't coming true, isn't that great news?No, it doesn't, it means there is natural variability, but the trend keeps decreasing: if you look back the data from 2000 to 1978, you'll see that this year's cover is below all those other years.https://climatereanalyzer.org/clim/seaice/
>>16089049>>Antarctic sea ice extent is 2% greater now than it was in the 1970sare you sure?https://climatereanalyzer.org/clim/seaice/
>>16096929>because they don't care about the environmentSTFU you suicidal psycho, speak for yourself only
