Anonymous ## Mod
12/02/15(Wed)18:02:38 No.5006

Anonymous ## Mod 12/02/15(Wed)18:02:38 No.5006

Please note that although /news/ is a text board, the thread creator is permitted to upload an image to the original post. All replies to the thread, however, are to be strictly text only.

>>460024
Tulsi raised her hand too, albeit reluctantly. She was just a funny meme man just like yang. Commie traitors that get the rope too.

>>460212
>What makes you think that I didn't?
The fact that polling data from multiple sources disagrees with your assertion, so either you were talking about him broadly (because he's less favored generally), meaning you didn't finish the sentence, or you live in some bubble where Obama is hated and then assume everyone else on the left side of the spectrum hates him too, meaning you're retarded.

Also it's entirely possible to be disappointed in the outcome of a presidency while still liking the man and his ideals (conversely it's possible to like the outcome of a presidency while hating the man and his ideals, ex. moderate Republicans' opinion on Trump). I personally feel there was a lot of wasted potential, he burned a lot of political capital to pass the ACA which ended up crippling the rest of his presidency, however I still like him as he represents a measured take on liberal policies, willing to compromise to try and get something everyone will like. Unfortunately for him, extreme partisans, left or right, don't compromise, so that same thing I like about him killed his presidency.

Honestly his failures probably galvanized a bunch of radicals: far left liberals, seeing that compromise got nothing done, decided to go all-in on socialist and identify politics shit; and far right conservatives, seeing liberal polices killed by a lack of compromise, decided obstruction is the best thing ever and started stonewalling even things with general bipartisan agreement or even other conservative ideas for not being conservative enough. Meanwhile moderates of both sides see this rising radicalism and find themselves wishing for another Obama type (though obviously moderate conservatives want a conservative version), which I think is why Obama's numbers remain high even though his legacy as a president is one of failure.

>>460272
>his ideals
What were they?

>>459922
Whoever can keep their face and name above the newspaper fold will be rhe nominee, assuming no clinton-like tricks.

>>460272
>>What makes you think that I didn't?
>The fact that polling data from multiple sources disagrees with your assertion, so either you were talking about him broadly (because he's less favored generally), meaning you didn't finish the sentence, or you live in some bubble where Obama is hated and then assume everyone else on the left side of the spectrum hates him too, meaning you're retarded.
>Also it's entirely possible to be disappointed in the outcome of a presidency while still liking the man and his ideals (conversely it's possible to like the outcome of a presidency while hating the man and his ideals, ex. moderate Republicans' opinion on Trump). I personally feel there was a lot of wasted potential, he burned a lot of political capital to pass the ACA which ended up crippling the rest of his presidency, however I still like him as he represents a measured take on liberal policies, willing to compromise to try and get something everyone will like. Unfortunately for him, extreme partisans, left or right, don't compromise, so that same thing I like about him killed his presidency.
>Honestly his failures probably galvanized a bunch of radicals: far left liberals, seeing that compromise got nothing done, decided to go all-in on socialist and identify politics shit; and far right conservatives, seeing liberal polices killed by a lack of compromise, decided obstruction is the best thing ever and started stonewalling even things with general bipartisan agreement or even other conservative ideas for not being conservative enough. Meanwhile moderates of both sides see this rising radicalism and find themselves wishing for another Obama type (though obviously moderate conservatives want a conservative version), which I think is why Obama's numbers remain high even though his legacy as a president is one of failure.

Obama just couldn't get past being black. History is not going to be kind to Obama's presidency.

>>460260
The coffee shop can refuse service and ask people to leave. The problem is the employee and owner disagreed about the employee's action.

>>460316
What the fuck are you talking about?

>>460332
Does it matter? The kid even fails at elementary grade orthography. You could as well try discussing the issue with a chicken. The outcome would be exactly the same.

>>460324
How do I know you can't read, the post.

Mentally Ill man, pretending to be a woman goes on a rant at a customer. News at 11

Lol, stupid brain damaged tranny. Hope he enjoys unemployment.

>>460306
>i'm suicidal with white guilt and anyone who isn't is a nigger
How brave of you, but why would anyone buy into the words of some who openly admits that they're stupid enough to be tricked into being a self-destructing baizuo? Only someone stupid enough to think that all people of the same skin color are identical could "reason" themselves into that corner. If you as an individual don't see merit in yourself and assume that you've only got what you got because of racism then thats your problem as in individual, don't blame my skin and bones for your personal inabilities.

>>459947
>>460306
I'm going to split the difference between these two extremes and say that while white privilege exists, its current effects insignificant compared to the power of money and influence. Being rich gives you minimal punishments (or none at all) for all crimes, being white just means you're more likely to be given the benefit of the doubt for petty crimes. Some white people might also benefit from the residual effects of Jim Crow segregation (which is the real era of white privilege) but that effect is uneven and fading with time, while being rich will get you benefits regardless of era (unless you're black during segregation, then white people will just burn your money, see the Tulsa race riot). So in modern times being wealthy is way more important than what race you are, that only really matters if you're poor.

>>460306
>True white
>-berg

Every time.

>>460271
at least it's cold as her tits over there

>>460306
>>white privilege is a leftist myth
>As a true white I can assure you that you have to be unbelievably stupid in order to believe that. Get out of your mother's basement once in a while.

Fuck off Shlomo

>Officers said that Dulaney had previous drug arrest and added that marijuana, a pipe and a prescription bottle believed to contain Xanax inside the vehicle. They added that the car belonged to a friend he was staying with and that the friend had reported the vehicle missing.

So he actually was guilty, just a thieving junky piece of shit that deserved to have his skull caved in.

>>459174
Said the badge bunny. Keep licking those blue balls.

>>459124
>fake emotions as argument
yawn. You think anons on /news are naïve ?

Wow, what a high IQ take.

>>459124
Daily mail uk is not a credible source. Come back later with a better source

>>459312
At like 1,000 in why didn’t he just pay the stupid fine?

>>459348
>To ensure that each citizen gets the justice he pays for.
Lol

>>459312
How do we fix the legal system. At this rate you should never go to court unless you can win 30000 pounds or more. This means companies can just fleece you for 100 pounds whenever they want and get away with it

>>460293
>How do we fix the legal system.
Introduce a codified civil law. First world style. This way the judicature is no longer arbitrary and bribe-based as it is in the US and the UK, it has to obey proper laws and rules like in Europe or China. This makes legal expense insurances possible. These insurances are rather common in socially developed countries, but practically unknown in the primitive and corrupt judicial systems of the Anglosphere.

>>459365
sunk cost fallacy is a hell of a drug

>>460247
Supporting any middle eastern government is supporting terrorism

>>460299
>supporting soveriegn governments = supporting terrorism
special olympics bronze medal in rhetoric

Can’t wait for American pigs to get blown up and get ptsd against based houthi guerillas. Fuck the Zionist triumvirate of America Israel and Saudi Arabia

>>460318
>what are corsairs, mommy
you surely got the gold one, congrats

>>460247
Where did I say that the attacks were okay? I'm merely pointing out that the Saudis are also bastards.

>>460303
One person has passed genes onto the future, you have not.
Children are one of the few things that do matter.

>>460314
Peer review means that the reviewer believes the study has no obvious errors and appears to have been conducted as written. They are saying they think the writer actually did the experiment as written.
They don't validate anything, they just read the research paper and enclosures.

>>460329
no, thats just to propaganda they tell you. in reality peer review is nothing more than a backslapper's club.

>>460330
Except any good peer review process is done anonymously and by people you probably have never met. Your first draft is almost always rejected and torn apart, especially for prestigious journals like Nature. It's not a good ol boys club.

>>460219
One of the only concrete claims made by that propaganda piece you linked was the sensational point that CAFE standards kill, which is so disputed you can find recent academic research which claims the exact opposite:
https://www.nber.org/papers/w23340.pdf
Other than that what else does your article do? Go for low hanging fruit like Al Gore and literally seethe at unknown, un-named New York elites?

>implying I ever said that people shouldn't industrialize
Nice strawman faggot. You'll find that the chinese agree with the environmentalists when it comes to clean energy, they're investing massively into it.

Your claim that global warming is somehow diverting funds and effort from more important research is also completely unfounded and uncited. We have a president now that gives no shits about the environment. What does he do for other research?
>NIH would face a roughly $4.5-billion budget cut, according to a document from the Department of Health and Human Services. If Congress were to sign off on the budget request, the big losers would include the National Cancer Institute (whose budget would drop from $6.1 billion to $5.2 billion) and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (whose budget would fall from $5.5 billion to $4.75 billion).
https://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-trump-budget-science-20190312-story.html

>>459435
What if you just like have a breakup 29 and then you're 30 year old single woman?

Like sometimes people are humans and take time for themselves.

I think this is just a shift in demographic now that women and men make more equal pay women are suddenly shocked to find that their husband does not make extremely more than them and pay for their stuff as they did for the last few thousand years.

>>459404

lol just noticed this gem post.

I was delivering Pizzas when we met and started dating.

Do you expect a man to already have a 6+ figure income, own a current year sports car, and already have a 5+ bedroom house with empty rooms just waiting for you to move in?

Yeah, if you're a single lady then I guarantee you are going to be single for a very long time with that attitude. Good men are made and built up through motivation. Good women provide that motivation.

>>460053
Almost every man I've met who went out of their way to complain about women being too picky, gold diggers, etc., was either an ineligible bachelor who had their sights set way too high, or had their hearts broken multiple times.

How convenient for you that you're a successful millionaire who conveniently met your wife before you were wealthy, yet you still feel compelled to visit us on 4chan to tell us how awful most women are, but no sir, you're with a wonderful woman AND you're super successful! Basically, part of your story is clearly a load of shit, but keep trying to convince us you're living the life.

>>460053
Also, the entire premise of your original post is idiotic. What the poll found is that wealthy, successful men marry at a higher rate than less educated, lower income men. What a shocker! You know what else is true? Overweight women get married at a lower rate than skinny women, and are promoted at a slower pace than skinny women. It's almost like being attractive, intelligent, and successful makes people look like better suitors than being ugly and unsuccessful. Who would have thought that people are shallow and want the best partner they can find?

>>460115
it's not even being shallow at this point, it's just common sense
you don't go for the broken product, the crappy food, the terrible perfume because they just suck
same thing with people

>>458764
God bless america

>>458771
>>458764
Yep. Don’t think about how the Europeans will have to pay for it by accepting refugees

>>458764
>Have to
Not how it works

>>460264
I think it’s because it’s the only private space available. Can’t do it at work cuz you don’t get paid for it. Not at home cuz you’ll piss off your spouse and kids. The only option is in a bar or in your car, but the former gives you a drunk audience.

Cars are quiet, and no one but a crowd of YouTube boomers will ever know you said it

>>460240
Do you have a source for the study on negative bias in patient care? Having volunteered at a county hospital emergency room for a short period of time, the only times I saw bias in care was when a patient had a history of drug seeking, was belligerent, or just outright rude to the overworked physicians. I guess I am just curious on the controls used in the study, like were the patients all visiting for similar reasons (Trauma, OD, infection, etc.), GP v Emergency room, etc. All of these can heavily skew the results

>>460302
I think that whats really going on is women get better care than men, but women are such terminally unsatisfied, demeaning crybabies that their superior level of care is still not good enough for them. They'd probably get a better grasp on reality if their enablers didn't let them get away with the incessant selfishness, thats my opinion.

>>460302
You might be about to reeee over >muh anecdotal evidence, but I know countless women who have stories about not being believed by doctors. A lot of them have issues like chronic fatigue syndrome, hormone imbalances, depression, etc, and doctors (even female doctors) just tell them, "You're talking shit; you're just imagining it." It's an absolute disgrace. And yet, once they eventually meet an actual expert in that field, the expert always agrees with them that they do have the illness after all. I've got a friend with Behcet's Syndrome, which is pretty rare, and it took her years to be diagnosed with it.

However, on the other hand, my dad had kidney failure a couple of years ago and nearly died. My mum took him to several doctors, and they each just shrugged and went, "I dunno? Eat more vegetables?" until my dad collapsed and was taken to hospital literally a few hours before he would have died. So the issue might not be >muh women are victims, but rather that doctors frequently have no clue what they're talking about and are unwilling to admit to this because they have a God complex. I'd like to see some research into gender differences between patients who have dealt with retard doctors. Maybe women have more experiences with doctors being clueless shitters, or maybe they don't.

>>460302
Here's one study:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3518332/

#believementallyillwomenlookingforaquickbuck

>>460285
they'll pocket some extra cash for themselves on the book because of trump's epic tax cuts

>>460203
He def did that shit

>>460205
oh wow someone who went to law school at a prestigious university does high profile cases. who would have thought.

>>460325
>went to law school
right, people just happen to go to ivy league schools on merit or by accident and its not all bribery and nepotism that decides who gets to have the opportunity for life as a super-important ivy league law school grad.
rah-rah-rah

>>459614
lol, I haven't had an update for this computer in over 2 years and it works just fine
they keep forcing that update shit just to kill our computers so that we buy more and i haven't that shit you nomsayin?

>>460149
i used to be like that with punk rock bands back when i was in jr high

>>459614
works on my machine. and yes i updated like 2 days ago

>>459614
I killed cortona on my pc.

>>459614
LTSC doesn't have this problem

>>460179
Inb4 it's Trump's buddies who got the contract and they're just bleeding the American people dry. That or the Truml Whitehouse is discovering that building a wall on extremely rough terrain in an inhospitable desert is a lot harder and more costly than they thought it was going to be.

>>459967
Shiiiiiiit. It’s the number one meme answer everytime there’s slow progress on the wall.

>>459954
so is the wall being built or not? le donald and Pim Toole have said that it is but now there's news saying it isn't. I don't care about the money but is the thing going up or nah?

>>460249
He's a New York born and bread billionaire(??????) Of course he shady construction and nepotism is involved.

>>460061
He's actually right, but for the wrong reasons. As the Republican party loses prominence, the Democratic party will undergo a schism centered around one issue or another, probably whether to implement fully socialist policies or not, and we will eventually be left with 2 major parties again. Likely the parties will be similar to what we see currently, with one favoring more leftwing policies and the other right wing. The US public is just too comfortable with a 2 party system

>>460277
Gun control is constitutional too. Otherwise I’d be bearing nuclear arms by now. And where’s you get that 3 percent from?

>>460268
No, Jesus, let me break this down as simple as I can for you.

Assuming this is you... You said:
>Even the VC had military grade weapons

I just showed you a video of civilians with military grade weapons.

So your fucking line of argument that our armed civilians couldn't stand a chance against our military is bullshit.

Because not only did
>the VC had military grade weapons
We also have military grade weapons - and we're not at war. Those were people who do this FOR FUN.

That's the point I was making with the video. That is one example of civilians owning tanks, machine guns, artillery, flamethrowers, etc.

>>456535
You're a retard

>>460262
>Already you’re counting on the help of other nations instead of your own mettle.
No that was one point. Which is why I said:
>Which is a moot fucking point because...
Even without outside help Americans are armed enough to fight against our police and military.

>And who says the whole of Texas is with you?
Not the point I was getting at. The point was we have one country who already said they would intervene if the US has another civil war. So, again, how would that be prevented?
But since you asked who says the whole of Texas is with you, who says the whole military would be okay with shooting their own people? Who says soldiers won't defect?

>>460266
>And if they did would anything change?
*sigh* I feel like we have a failure to communicate here. That was a sarcastic question (hence the two question marks)... you do realize they had boats that could cross an ocean during the civil war, right?

The point... I'm trying to make... is the only reason no other country interfered during the civil war was because of slavery. Otherwise you can bet your ass England and France would have loved to see the US divided.

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>460239
>I had a good point.
No anon, you didn’t.