>large men are a waste of energyBut somehow large women aren't?>a tiny man will raise a dozen young with one womanNot a dozen tiny cuckolds and one ant queen?>tiny men will be better at warfare and will kill taller evil menUntil the taller evil men have armor. And learn to squash bugs. >women will rule society and men will be cute shota warriorsLiterally just fiction. Seriously, it's time we end this faggot's existence. His whole shtick is just a fetish, and not even a good one. Literally all the issues he has with women being smaller than men could be fixed by giving women more elastic abdomens and wider pelvises with more cartilage. Even the vorefags were more on to something on women, and even they knew damn well that what they were into was just a fetish.
>>13774123They'd lose against a population of equally intelligent more numerous people with superior fertility and more optimized body size for the modern world.>>13774124A society of all women or one of all men can't compete against women + men. The two sexes are too powerful in their specialization to think you can compete while missing one of them.I've rendered the SCUM manifesto obsolete. We dont need to get rid of males, we just need to remove their ability to hurt women in the domestic setting.
>>13774008 Do you realize that those are two diferent scenarios? 1. a women willing to date someone some centimeters shorter, and 2. a women willing to date a midget. I almost forgot about the technology issue, you see, a collapse is not the only scenario, technology can simply be stagnant, maybe limits exist in what the human can make,.But, even if the futuristic-technology era is on its way, you still have many problems even with your solution, yo arent the only one bond-villain that thinks his ideas are better and should be efforced and then asking why so many people are furious, but even far than the revolutionaries forces that will be born in your little nation, you still have enemies outside, other assholes that think they can mold millions of humans lives in their twisted ideas, one could be me, because your little utopia clash with my idea of a future with monmusus-wives.
>>13774141I'm not mentally ill.
>>13774150Those aren't two different scenarios. The women willing to date a 142cm man weren't themselves all short. They had varied heights, some were taller than average. The willingness to date a man who is literally a midget is seen in 6% of women. Whatever causes this can be found.As for your other stuff, I don't know what a monmusus wife is. What is that?
don't careI'm only 182cm tall, but if you're not at least 187cm tall you're no woman at all.
Yeah, alright, lets get it out of the way. It does look really stupid.But it's actually functional. Literally infinite range, cheap, fast, you never have to spend time getting gas or waiting for a charge. Monocoque body made from composites because it turns out carrying dead weight costs fuel.Crams as many high efficiency solar cells every place it can because more power is better.The motors are inside the wheels because shaving weight and complexity gives you a better vehicle.Functional design somehow gives you a cargo capacity of 25 cubic feet (same as a Tesla Model S) because people don't want a gimmick.Electric power on the go because charging your phone or powering your cooker while camping shouldn't be a hassle.The body has a super aerodynamic shape, drag coefficient of 1.3, because why would you want a vehicle that spends most of its fuel fighting the wind?This thing seems pretty decked out for a $20,000 car, and although it does look overly futuristic, perhaps reminiscent of a concept drawing of some retro future from the 70s, it actually appears almost capable.We all know this will be the future, when solar cells and batteries cost half of what they do now, and offer twice the efficiency/energy density. They've been talking about this for decades, but they're starting to get appealing.Make me uncomfortable with driving a stupid looking fantasy car /sci/, tell me how the physics of it don't add up.
>>13773553Solar is cheaper than oil, but solar+batteries is far more expensive than oil. Batteries cost 135$/kWh, and an average city uses 1-10 GigaWatts. Meaning a small 1 GW city would need 135 billion to run a single sunless hour off batteries every day.Nuclear is $0.096/kWh, but that's all you're going to pay, and it doesn't even pollute.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economics_of_nuclear_power_plants#Cost_per_kWh>>13773545Batteries don't have great energy density, but electric motors have terrific efficiency vs gas engines (95% vs 25%). Batteries are getting cheaper, more sustainable and more powerful every year, and Tesla's batteries have specifically the least amounts of rare metals of any batteries, you dope.Electric cars are far superior in every imaginable way except for one; they're more expensive.
>>13773878Come on now, when your math is off by several orders of magnitude every time you shouldn't be posting.
>>13774176Price of battery kWh is easily found on the internet. A kiloWatt-hour supplies 1 kiloWatt for 1 hour. This is basic math. If you think this math is off its YOU who shouldn't be posting, especially here on this board.
>>13774263Yes and how many kilowatt hours are in a gigawatt being used for an hour? Hint: it's not a billion. I mean come on now, surely you would have first checked your math or did you unironically make the same mistake twice even after it was pointed out once already? Honestly quite embarassing.
>>13772452perserverance doesn't use a nuclear reactor.>>That's why they have batteries Anon, You can store your energy for later.if you are storing energy for later, then why not just use a bigger solar panel that isn't attached to the car?
FAA open mic night editionprevious: >>13770272
>>13774831sure they do, the new shepard cargo variant
>>13774832I'm sure Papa Johns will jump to the opportunity of delivering single pizzas around the world immediately.
>>13774830Ahahahahaha
>>13774831i know, thats why i thought it was strange
>>13774838>>13774830[spoiler]it's also a rendered engine[/spoiler]
Formerly >>13736278 Welcome to the STEM Career General!This thread exists to answer questions regarding careers in STEM.>the ins and outs of academic career progression>how to penetrate industry from academia>anything else in relation to STEM employment or advancement within STEM academia!Resources for protecting yourself from academic marxists:>https://www.thefire.org/ (US)>https://www.jccf.ca/ (Canada)General information:>https://sciencecareergeneral.neocities.org/>*The Chad author is seeking additional input to expand the text so it discusses all STEM fields. Said author regularly views these /scg/ threads.No one has answered your question? Consider posting it here:>https://academia.stackexchange.com/Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>13774071what do you mean by little going on? Do you not have a job or what?
>>13774255i'm just about to obtain a BS in physics from pic related. Actually I already have obtained it, but they don't mail them out until december.>no internships>research credit was a meme that i didn't get until last semester>no other research>low gpa>graduated late due to issues>no real jobs throughout college either
>>13774071As long as society is controlled by (((capital))) instead of labor, all careers will be brutal. STEM is just particularly blackpilling because we tend to put a lot more unpaid labor in upfront, so if the route we followed isn't lucrative in the end, we're double screwed.
>>13774415I was more referring to the competitiveness, but that too.I just wanna figure things out learn about reality.
>>13774769Competitiveness is part of this. Full employment is bad for people at the top. The more you have to beg for employment, the less you are willing to demand and the more free labor you are willing to give out. No one in this society is incentivized to fully utilize the human capital available, so we beg. Science also has tons of idealistic idiots who want to be in it to change the world and discover something exciting, so they can and will take advantage of that, the same reason video game development is a horrendously exploitative industry to work in. I just wanted to learn things too, but I just become more and more bitter the further in I get. This anon's >>13767342 PI was very wise, should've just become a brick layer. At least no one expects you to lay bricks for free for the love of brick laying.
okay so memes and bs posts aside, what do you think the ((actual)) response to climate change is going to look like? WHEN do you think it will be? we're already well committed to it now, how are we going to get out of it? the ball keeps rolling down the hill and it keeps getting worse and worse with little action being done. i'm interested to hear this because i'm in my 20's now so it's going to be the major global issue of my lifetime.
>>13772286>a little iron sulphateThe greens freaked out when that was tried because it worked ridiculously well.
>>13772156Even if we erase ourselves from existence the problem will continue since it's led by developing countries, India, and China. So no amount of doing anything matters. They're all burning way more coal than we ever did, and dumping 1000x more plastic in the oceans.
>>13773220
>>13772413This and also incorporate biochar into your soil
>>13772286>>13773290
>We now know that natural immunity to Sars-CoV-2 begins to dwindle over time. OneDanish studysuggested that the under-65s had about 80% protection for at least six months, while the over-65s had only 47% protection.>InOklahoma, which has a population of about 3.9 million, there were 5,229 reinfections reported during September (equivalent to a reinfection rate of 1,152 per 100,000) and reinfections have risen 350% since May.>“The major implications are that if you haven’t been vaccinated, you should get vaccinated, and if you’ve been infected, you should go ahead and get vaccinated anyway, because that will extend the duration of your protection.”https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/oct/19/without-covid-19-jab-reinfection-may-occur-every-16-months-say-scientists
>>13769862Are these reinfections a severe disease or a common cold like illness? Fuck off with this clickbait
>>13771969>>13771957Bump
>>13772769>Comparing a 100% mortality rate virus to a 1% flu.You are an asshat
>>13770220Imagine getting the flu shot yearly lol
>>13770372There are many required vaccinations to attend work and school
No really why does anyone think lawns are good for the environment
>>13772066>17would you?
>>13772481Humans
>>13772421>4 time 0.0000000001 is 0.0000000004Oh my! We better stop using lawnmowers!
>>13772066I remember when they had the voices of the most important people in humanity heard in the final episode of Loki and only her voice along with a bunch of black women were heard
>>13772481https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/174407/
What do you think about the work of Christopher Alexander?https://blog.p2pfoundation.net/empirical-findings-from-the-nature-of-order/2014/04/15
>>13773764Thats a very pretty book cover. I doubt the contents of it are anything good though
>>13773937OP here, I think his work blends well with Pirsig's work>Quality is Morality. Quality is Value. They are the same thing. Quality doesn’t have to be defined. You understand it without definition, ahead of definition. Quality is a direct experience independent of and prior to intellectual abstractions. Quality is indivisible, undefinable and unknowablehttps://blas.com/lila/And with this essayhttps://www.sidis.net/Unconscious%20Intelligence.htm
>>13774114>Source: trust me bro
Is there any credibility to these? I've read about people who've claimed to have "died" during operations and left their bodies and when they came back they correctly indentified shit that went on while they were "dead"Is this true?
Yes, but its poorly understood and much less properly studied (how would one even test it)With that being said there is a ton of people with anecdotal stories of experience out of body experience during serious surgeries, accidents and on brink of death. These stories have been told across several cultures for thousands of years. Which I suspect is where the concept of spirit being a seperate entity originates from. That too is consistently described the same too. (Feeling light, floating, being able to watch your own body like you got out of it)
Just gonna post a laundry list of evidence: >Reconstruction the real chimpouts started when there were black-white female couples forming during reconstruction. Of course, before this, white slavemasters often fucked their female slaves far more often. But despite this fact, whites were still extremely offended by even a few examples of the reverse pairing. >Aryan caste system Light brown Indo-Aryans conquered medium brown Indus valley people in 4000 BC. However, an unmentioned fact is that mixing in Northern India was not frowned upon for the first several hundred years. It was only after this period of mixing that the caste system was created, based on skin color. In other words, the caste system was created to deal with the problem of darker men (either Indus inhabitants, or even darker Dravidians from further south) taking lighter wives. >Black men are taller In a study using NFL quarterbacks, Whites perceived those with Black faces to be taller and stronger than those with white faces, even though their actual heights were equal. The "height bonus due to dark skin" was 1 inch. >Middle Eastern features get the womb A Czech study on White Czechs sorted men into blue-eyed vs. brown-eyed pools. They tested women on their sexual preferences of each color male. While not ovulating, Czech women preferred the blue-eyed Czech men. Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>13773289>Do men find darker men more sexually threatening?Only incels
>>13773289>Men don't want men from other tribes taking their womenNo shit. Brown men find white men threatening too.
>>13773321Then why is there such a huge historical (and even current) pushback from light incels but not dark incels? For example, in the Ottoman army, white Janissaries were allowed to wed Turkish women, they had no problem with it. It's only when the man is darker that the local populace finds them threatening. Even today, 16% of whites (which functionally means 30% of white males) oppose interracial marriage, while only 4% of black people (or 8% of black males) do the same.
>>13774010>Then why is there such a huge historical (and even current) pushback from light incels but not dark incels?There's a fucking HUGE pushback from nonwhite incels They literally have a saying, "just be white"
Science is fucking dead.
>>13756333Meds now
>>13757945>If we planned on deceiving or sweeping things under the carpet, we wouldn't be doing clinical trials to begin withwe who motherfucker? are you a pfizer employee?i think i saw a post exactly like yours recently, are you a bot?
>>13758365Who are they?
>>13771011>I'm starting to think that these are 4D reverse uno psyops pushed by nazis to present the left as completely unbearableTook you long enough to figure it out.
>>13761526It's because they are taking advantage of a crisis to increase their power. Even if it turns out that this disease has a survival rate of 99.98% for anyone, except someone with 4 or more comorbidities (often who is just dying from the comorbidities and just happens to also get covid at the same time) and/or is over 60 years old, they can just use media to keep the crisis going. Just paint a bunch of maps red and show that to people.They can make a crisis out of anything and use it for anything, just have the media shill and repeat some narrative enough times. Even if you know it's wrong you also know the people creating the narrative couldn't care less and they are going to keep pushing it no matter what the facts. So, some people just give in. And they slowly become convinced that there is no truth except what the media tells us, and that everything else, even if concrete fact, is simply "misinformation." Because even if it is fact, it will simply be ignored by the media and nobody will be allowed to talk about it unless they want to be treated as a misinformer, or have midwits condescendingly "educate" them about the latest talking points which everyone already knows.
Is it possible to live entirely without pair bonding with the opposite sex? What are the complications from a scientific point?
>>13753117>>13761658>lived 82 years without seeing/experiencing the pure evil called womanBlessed, lucky, or both.
>>13771308Women are evolved to detect hateful incels and he got (rightfully) filtered
>>13772434ok gigachad
>>13773955No I mean, you may have to chat them up, but once it gets going, you can bea man of few words. And just enough of an asshole that it seems you are Frank and don't bullshit anyone.
>>13751839I sorta feel the same way man. Speaking for myself, I don't hate women or anything like that, but the effort to date ANY girl will always be above the benefits I'd get out of it. I'd honestly rather date dudes, and I'd be gay myself if it homosexual acts didnt disgust me on an unconscious and uncontrollable level. I dont feel like my life has much value, but I hate everybody I don't know, so I'm not looking for a validation to my life by some piece of shit I don't care about. Life is comfy enough alone
Quantum mechanics and general relativity has had almost no impact on anyones life. And the predictions don’t have any real value eitherMost of the predictions are found as some test result from a telescope or a particle collider, some numbers on a screen.
>i dont know any QM at all but im going to pretend to know enough about it to disprove all of it
>>13773828>>i dont know any QM at all but im going to pretend to know enough about it to disprove all of itI know the answer. Its a ridiculous answer. The electron decomposes to a wave of probability. Schrodingers electron becomes a "cloud" of probability, but of course that's idiotic.
>>13773906>i don't like the implications of the theory that best predicts subatiomical phenomenafeel free to come up with anything that comes even close to QM. you can adhere to pilot wave theory btw, but that breaks causality
>>13773917>>i don't like the implicationsyou mean:retro causalityinstant state teleportationviolation of conservation laws.non-repeatabilityThe idea that probability is physicalviolation of the speed of lightspooky action at a distanceBTW did you ever figure out what Planck's constant is the angular momentum of? Are you sure Schrodingers equation isn't just a fitted statistical model?
>>13773917>feel free to come up with anything that comes even close to QMI did here.>>13770359
fuck there is so much information to learn. how on earth do you retain everything?
>>13773348
>>13768757There really isn't that much to learn. Most information is highly 'noisy' or repeating the same basic shit.The hard part isn't so much retaining it but filtering out all that noise and only finding the shit that as this >>13770447 anon says has practical applications.>>13770493In this context, a practical application means that there is a non-prohibitive opportunity cost to taking action on the information. A recipe with common ingredients when you have a modern kitchen? Practical application exists.Same recipe in a tent in the Sahara where there's no supermarket for hundreds of miles and the recipe doesn't call for camel meat? Not a practical application.Learning how to play Bruno Mars songs on guitar to get chicks? Practical Application in a normie environment, not a practical application with a bunch of gothic Cocteau Twin and Japanoise loving hipsters.The question is, do we factoring in the searching and the filtering of the noise from the signal in this evaluation?>>13773348Even then you need the right kind of trivia
>>13768843Thats a really wise way of looking at things anon, how old are you?
>>13768757You only need to remember a summary and some keywords in order to find back the wanted informations.
The human mind is not made to retain such information, if it is important and you force yourself to remember you will. And for everything else put it on a txt file, you can write anything for later and it wouldn't even take up 1/10th of the space of a microsd card.
Calculus is for fags who will never understand quantum mechanics. The finite dimensional case is all you need. If you try to show me an "eigenfunction", I will kill you.
>>13770988whoever said calc 3 is easier than 2 is smoking crack. Probably I'm a bit retarded. But on Midterm 1 we covered up to triple integrals and Stoke's Theorem. We use definition of limit to prove multivariable limits and they are fucking rigorous when they mark. I got an A- in calc 2 and this class is looking like a C+ so far holy shieeet
>>13772684This image makes me graduate with honors in Electrical Engineering
>>13773856makes you score 41% on your final exams
>>13772684Tag yourselves. I'm Amp :3
>>13770988Calm down Bobby, you would get humiliated by a chicken if you were to try to kill it.
