I keep hearing this phrase a lot in the last couple years. Im a normie i, so Ive no idea what it means? can some one give me a good idea.Ive heard a lot of doomsday scenarios in the past so forgive me for being skeptical
>>12598418Honestly . U just dont care anymore. Call it the normalcy bias. But I've heard too many doomsday theories and to poor to do anything about it. I just dont care anymore. If it happens. We'll deal with it. I just dont care anymore it's sad. But if were at the point where theres nothing to do then that's at it
>>12598467Why? Isnt the science board is where all the smart people on 4 chan reside
>>12598506Haha! Good one!
>>12598511Lmao.
Honestly, you really are better off asking over at /x/. Don't knock the board until you've tried it. This one is populated by retarded grognards who will ever only discuss the "accepted" science thus contradicting the very spirit of science itself. The only ones doing real science on this board are the /pol/ splinters who come here. The rest is a bunch of I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE jerkoffs who contribute nothing.
Could aging be "reversed" or "cured" within our lifetime?
What about nanomachines?
>>12596544the "covid lifestyle" is anything but healthy.
>>12595663> If we lived in a fair world we'd also have universal healthcare and a bunch of other shit. But unfortunately we live in a capitalist world controlled by and for the rich.this is not a very scientific analysis
>>12594389Dr Amen Ra is going to live to 200 by eating one meal a day and follow based egytpian metaphysics
>>12598555>by eating one meal a dayThat makes you live to 200? I already do that out of sheer laziness.
.
>>12597310Yes
>>12597316It's right, idiot. That's basic physics. Explain why the efficiency increases with the difference in temperature is this is not the case.
>>12597342There are other factors that also influence efficiency. The temperature difference only governs the max theoretical efficiency.
>>12597494It's also proportional to the real efficiency in any situation and pretty much all other factors that affect efficiency will be static for a given device. That's why I said it determines the efficiency.
>>12595725Thats absolutely fucking not what its the same as, at all! Learn to science you fucking retard
At what point in time do you think COVID would have run its course? Late 2022/early 2023?
>>12598518>Because that's what we pay them for.July 6, 2021 and the US is out of the WHO> If they couldn't help in the current worst case scenario what makes you think they will help in worse cases?I don't and I'm not advocating but I am simply saying that they are right on lockdown policy right now. Also, I find it funny to cite them whenever libs talk about lockdowns and criticize them for not "trusting the health experts and the science".
>>12598528>hurr durr the whole world is the USI wonder why don't you simply fuck off to /pol/.
>>12598538I'm in US, so "we" won't be paying them anymore. Don't be butthurt about it. I'm sure your dumbass countries will still be though so enjoy your governments using the WHO info.
>>12598542I don't get what you're so happy about, you became the world reservoir of the shit.
>>12598560We don't have to waste money on a corrupt organization that repeatedly lies to people during a pandemic. That's what I'm happy about. We can reinforce our own institutions. Fuck the WHO.
>Virus has a 0.01% chance to kill you>Taking the vaccine will not prevent you from spreading it to others as you still get infected by it.>Vaccine has a 5% chance of causing short term side effects, and the long term and even lifelong side effects are all unknown as MRNA technology has never been done on humans before.Why should I take it again?
>>12595429>Virus has a 0.01% chance to kill youlike the flu>Taking the vaccine will not prevent you from spreading it to others as you still get infected by it.like the flu vaccine>Vaccine has a 5% chance of causing short term side effects, and the long term and even lifelong side effects are all unknown as MRNA technology has never been done on humans before.Smallpox and Polio are MRNA viruses.
>>12595760It's more rhetorical for myself, and each person is going to have their own risk rating and their own decision to make.>>12595761So why wasn't MERS called SARS-CoV-2 if they're the same thing? I think you're placing too much importance on the name. Had SARS-CoV-2 been discovered in the middle east, it'd likely be MERS-2, or if it'd been discovered in North America, it'd likely have an entirely new name.
>>12595429You shouldn't. As any medical intervention, the risks and benefits are for you to take. You don't want them, you're playing with your own life.
>>12595429Test
>>12595429Because a 5% chance of short term side effects is better than a 100% chance of short term side effects (being sick for like a week).
Is /sci/ part of the 2%?
>>12595736>>12596005prettysureithinkimightvegotit....is the solution stated somewhere in OPs header..?
>>12596042>It's not Fermat's Last Theorem because the pizza slice is not restricted to the integers.Fermat BTFO
>>12596018Tooker?
>>12596995he's right though
>>12595736Where is represant monkman
redpill me on constructor theory /sci/
Viruses (life-vectors or 'constructors' in technical literature) constructed everything out of God-waves.
Improved version. 99% can't do this.
>>12596783>each box contain a distinct PAIR of balls>one box contains 3 blue ballswhich is the distinct pair you filthy peasant
>>12597184anon just modified the original problem in which box 1 contained only 2 balls
>>125967831/3, 1/3, 1/2
>>12596783you need to state how "any box" is picked.Are you saying you pick a random box and pick a random ball from that box?Why not just fucking say that?
>>12596821I agree with 1. but I got bored and didn't do the rest.
>be me>discover /sci/>look forward to interesting discussions about math and science>only find threads from people confused about basic mathematical concepts and topics unrelated to math or sciencewhy is /sci/ like this?
>>12598346This board is 80% schizos, 20% students.
>>12598389I wish you fail your exams, normie.
>>12598346So instead of starting a science related thread, you started another topic unrelated to math or science.
>>12598346Because most posters don't even have a university degree and people who know science and math usually have better things to do than post on 4chan.
>>12598346Election userbase toll. This site will become worse every 4 years from here on.
Can someone tell me what this kind of “problem” is called so I can find more practice problems, and more practical problems involving this rule?
>>12596173it still has nothing to do with the derivative this is just a basic fraction stop giving advice if you are retarded
>>12595948The definition of derivative is in no way there. There is a difference quotient, but no limit.
>>12596230It has very much to do with the derivative tou dumb fuck
>>12596230If given any ε>0, you can restrict h in some interval (-δ,δ), and get that fraction's distance from some L less than ε for all values of h, then L is called the derivative of f at x.
Study first 2 chapters of James Stewart's Calculus Early Transcendentals and pay especially close attentions to laws of limits, exponents, reciprocals, logarithms to balance arithmetic like
Why is Eugenics considered debunked and bad but Natural Selection is accepted and unquestionable?
>>12584842What do you think the corona vaccine is?
>>12588245>Most disfigurements are the result of environmental insults rather than genetics.Ah, of course, clearly physical disfigurements are the result of trauma./sci/ 2021, lmao.
>>12586767oh nonono jewbros we got to cockyif it were about having the most geniuses then they should be following eugenics better themselves.Having more 180+ IQ scientists and mathematicians doesn't translate directly to competition since the wealth/IQ relation plateaus at the upper end. Being ultra rich and powerful is partly having at least ~130 IQ but mostly sheer luck and networking. The insulated old boys club of big money jews would barely be under more competition to a smarter population.I thinks it's even more evil than the somewhat reasonable motive of limitting competition.I think they would rather guarantee their position as kings of future brazilworld than risk having another Newton out there making discoveries that could shift the course of history.
>>12584842Wew lad
>>12584828??? Eugenics isn't debunked at all. In fact it's still in use today. What do you think the Tranny movement is?
Cybernetic implants when?When are they likely to be commercially available?
>>12598118Exist as upgrades to organic limbs, or as prosthetics for missing limbs?
>>12598090First you have to find a way to power it virtually without having to recharge it every day (and this is the hard part); then you have to find a way to connect the nerves, blood vessels and muscle/bone/other organs to the prosthetic without any tissue damage and without any kind of delay in the trasmission of neuronal signal.After that, you have to find a way to not having to change the prosthetic every 5-10 years because it can't repair itself and while it could be easy (it is not) to change a limb, it wouldn't be to change some other organs.I give it another 30-40 years before we'll see technologies as you see in your videogames but I personally think it will be only a temporary solution to a problem better dealt with biotechs and regenerative medicine
>>12598090they will be available in just 2 more weeks
>>12598337>First you have to find a way to power it virtually without having to recharge it every dayFuel, batteries, charge in a socket. Power doesn't seem the issue, if the limb is like an arm or leg then there's plenty space for battery storage.>then you have to find a way to connect the nerves, blood vessels and muscle/bone/other organs to the prosthetic without any tissue damage and without any kind of delay in the trasmission of neuronal signal.The artificial limbs don't need to be connected to nerves and blood vessels. https://uh.edu/news-events/stories/2015/March/0331BionicHand.php>After that, you have to find a way to not having to change the prosthetic every 5-10 years because it can't repair itself and while it could be easy (it is not) to change a limb, it wouldn't be to change some other organs.There's no modern technology that doesn't get replaced every 5-10 years. That's a lot of time for material engineering to advance, for lighter prosthetics, more accurate EEGs, better power consumption and more functionality. The only issue would be cost; but I'm sure the medical companies and banks would love to offer you a credit card and charge you interest on your limb over 15 years without issue.>biotechsWhat do you mean?
>>12598412>Power doesn't seem the issue, if the limb is like an arm or leg then there's plenty space for battery storageA battery needs to be recharged, the point is to find a way to not have to.Also, modern batteries are efficient but not that much>The artificial limbs don't need to be connected to nerves and blood vesselsIf you want it to respond to your thoughts as a normal limb would, yes it does. Trans-cutaneal sensors are not that sensitive and the only solution we have found right now for the problem is to surgically reposition under the skin the nerve you want to pick up >There's no modern technology that doesn't get replaced every 5-10 yearsYou don't get it, prosthetic surgery is difficult and dangerous, even more so each time you have to substitute the broken prosthetic with a new one: that's why knee prosthetics, for example, are usually left as a last measure and are not implanted before a certain age (if possible), because it's dangerous to change them and you have to do it every 10 years or so>There's no modern technology that doesn't get replaced every 5-10 yearsI mean that the most feasible and practical solution to the prosthetic problem is to just re-grow the limb/organ or at least clone it and transplant it
well, /sci/ - has google got this one right?
>>12596902For algebra and computers that is most useful so yes
>>12596902no
>>12596908>yes sir it is most useful sir show me one case when its useful
do ADHDtards really have to take this forever?i've heard that 90% of people with ADHD just have some sort of nutritional deficit, either due to poor diet or some sort of genetic metabolism issue why not just take nutritional supplements?
>>12595486No it's not a whole bunch of laws regard things as being illegal despite it only impacting and doesn't even account for when an action doesn't in any way impact someone else in the slightest if an inaction still wouldn't benefit them.Not to mention that people can have a huge damaging impact on someones without it ever even being illegal so no your reasoning doesn't make the slightest sense whatsoever.
>>12584613>My head never stops talking.Is this a sign of ADHD?>When I am doing something there are 3-4 parallel thought threads at all times. ISame here, and a strong associative streak plus good memory gives my head a LOT to talk about.
>>12567570just so you know >>12567021 is a /fit/poster
>>12565708Whenever i take this shit i feel great for 3-4 hours then i have a terrible headache and feel like shit for the rest of the day, yall get this shit too?
>>12567021melatonin suppresses dopamine production and makes you lazy, which would make sense since it puts you to sleep.
I studied bioingeniering, but I fall in love with programming. I already finished my mayor but I intend to take a masters in Computer Science/Software engineer. I want to fill my knowledge gaps by reading 5 to 8 books, 1 or 2 each month till november (application deadlines).To those well versed in the subject, which books would you recommend? My ultimate goal is to shift or start in the BlockChain-Crypto currency area, so if you have any preferred universities just shoot the name of the programme and I'll look the curriculum myself ;) Any help appreciat it!
teachyourselfcs.com all you need better than a degreet. cs graduate
Thanks fot the replys, I already know how to code in Python, Matlab and little of C; I should have clarified that I was going to program along the recommended books :) In any case, which books/languajes would you recomend me to read?
>>12597935>teachyourselfcs.comNice, this program reads better than OSSU.
>>12597935>teachyourselfcs.comNice!!
>>12597704you can get into that field with a master in bioinformatics, which is also a better match