Is onions milk actually bad for men?
>>15880793Kenichi sounds based 2bh
>>15882579This, 4chan was started as "SA without a $10 fee to post"
>>15882579>>15887349Cope, newfags
>>15879921triggered
How come the East Asian estrogen bean that we're suspiciously not allowed to mention by name sometimes wordfilters to based and sometimes to onions?Also why is it so controversial and censored to begin with anyway? Is it because of the bean's enormous estrogen content?
Mask study published by NIH says N95 Covid masks expose wearers to dangerous level of toxic compounds linked to seizures and cancerhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10112860/
>>15888085>Just today this board has tried to tell me that people need a steady supply of lead in their dietThat's one anon.>and that Down's syndrome is the next step in human evolution.Kek, haven't seen that one.
>>15876490Who's going to populate it once all Dutch people are euthanized?
>>15888819browns
>>15876490Euthanizing """""autists"""""" is based """""""autism""""""" is commonly diagnosed in retards with narcissistic personality disorder because """""""autism""""""" is part of the special snowflake spectrum of acceptable diagnoses, which means return business for Dr. Medbux, while patients diagnosed with narcissistic personality disorder walk out of the office and never come back because they're offended. Fat guy walks into a restaurant orders a bunch of high calorie crap and stuffs his face.Waiter says: "Wow you're such sophisticated gourmet, its been a pleasure serving you"gets a big tip and repeat business Waiter says: "Wow you're such disgusting fatass" no tip, no repeat business
>>15889557Palestinians. None of the neighboring Arab countries want them so they'll all end up in Europe
Physics especially modern physics is bullshit that literally no one can defend.Physics is literally on the same level as astrology and alchemy and belongs on /x/. Best example quantum physics.Literally toddler level shit philosophy.>If I put a blanket over my head the world stops existingAll you need to know about quantum physics.All """"experiments""" are (((thought experiments))) AKA literally not experiments and made up bullshit.>The cat is dead and alive at the same timeNo it is not. You simply do not know of its state retard. Literally >If I put a blanket over my head the world stops existing>b-b-b- science communicator saysPeak bullshit. >The cat is dead and alive at the same timePROVE THAT!Literally all you have is philosophical trash there is literally no way to prove that the cat is magically dead and alive at the same time or that you simply do not know what happened.End of story, no need to invent a anti-intellectual toddler bullshit of. Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>15890135Yes, Schrodinger came up with it specifically to illustrate what he saw as a problem with the Copenhagen interpretation. Since, while the box is closed, the aliveness of the cat is directly correlated to whether the radioactive source has decayed, and after a certain amount of time we cannot be sure whether the source has decayed, then there must be a point after which we are uncertain about the aliveness of the cat. The cat is not simultaneously both alive and dead, but the "alive" and "dead" outcomes are both possible. They exist in superposition. We cannot know if the cat is still alive until we actually open the box. When we open the box, we measure the quantum state of the system, and it collapses into one of the possible states. The cat is either alive or dead, not both.NB: As a *thought* experiment, all components are assumed to be perfect: any radioactive decay is detected with 100% of the time, the detector never triggers if there is no decay, the walls of the box are completely opaque, rigid, and soundproof, etc.
>>15887552Then how do we have modern technologies and systems?
>>15887552modern physics is like reading the talmud.
>OP fails to understand a bad metaphor that even the original scientist who came up with it admitted is not a great metaphor for anyone who wasnt a student of his>claims entire field of science is fake newstypical narcissist behavior. go do mushrooms and take a walk in the forest.
>>15887552Should be pretty easy to do an experiment to disprove whatever it is you don’t like then
> carcinogens are everywhere> studies are constantly p-hacked> climate change???> known facts may actually be things the government told us or whatever > god why are there so many chemicals everywhere> onions makes your dick fall off or some shit> COVID apparently fuses your neurons together which was thought to be impossible before???> everything is always important but never supposed to be taken seriously> google doesn’t work anymore > the world is constantly doing things to your brain that you cannot controlI don’t want to die. I wish there was a way to live healthy and happy without everything you do or buy being a hazard to your longevity. I feel paralyzed.
>>15880956>magneto protein gene virusesbased and Yakubpilled
>>15852979I should start eating more eggs
>>15887241Wher does the pic come from?
>>15887629Ben Garrison
>>15890731Thanks, I thought it looked familiar
Since the current crop of replication crisis era scientists have turned academic publishing into use a wasteland of greedily contrived toxic lies, should we get rid of the scientists had have AI do all the academic publishing from now on?
>>15884667Having the same people on a grant selection committee also be a reviewer for the resulting paper would be one hell of a coincidence. Sure, it's possible the paper reviewers might be affiliated in some way with the organization that funds the research, but it's unlikely they would feel a need to push the paper through to publication if it's not deserving of it. Plus the review process is supposed to be anonymous, so even if that were the case, any direct reference to the funding agency or grant number would likely be redacted from the draft sent to the reviewers. There are typically such a large number of grants given out it would be near impossible for a reviewer to recognize a proposal they approved. Again, unless we're talking about some super tiny, niche sub field of the social sciences where there are maybe six people total in the world working on it.
>>15884817the n word is racist
>>15884947>>15884947Having the same people on a grant selection committee also be a reviewer for the resulting paper would be one hell of a coincidenceits the same group of people, the individuals involved aren't a significant concern, they may as well be identical
>>15884814yeah I'm also watching that anime right now to bro
>>15887346It isn't really, most people only use it because its forbidden.
How to develop Anti GRAVITY?Serious answers
>>15891173In that situation gravity would just be antigravity, so you just use objects to attract each other and shit.Nobody said antigravity was going to be useful.
Was that it there?
>>15891237I published it in 2013.
>>15890288Came here to say this. If they exist.
>>15890615>>15890608>>15890583This is some powerful schizoid posting
Scientific publications are every bit as slanted and biased as conventional journalism ishttps://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2301642120>Prosocial motives underlie scientific censorship by scientists: A perspective and research agenda>Scientific censorship is rarely studied empirically. We explore the social, psychological, and institutional causes and consequences of scientific censorship (defined as actions aimed at obstructing particular scientific ideas from reaching an audience for reasons other than low scientific quality). Popular narratives suggest that scientific censorship is driven by authoritarian officials with dark motives, such as dogmatism and intolerance. Our analysis suggests that scientific censorship is often driven by scientists, who are primarily motivated by self-protection, benevolence toward peer scholars, and prosocial concerns for the well-being of human social groups. This perspective helps explain both recent findings on scientific censorship and recent changes to scientific institutions, such as the use of harm-based criteria to evaluate research. We discuss unknowns surrounding the consequences of censorship and provide recommendations for improving transparency and accountability in scientific decision-making to enable the exploration of these unknowns. The benefits of censorship may sometimes outweigh costs. However, until costs and benefits are examined empirically, scholars on opposing sides of ongoing debates are left to quarrel based on competing values, assumptions, and intuitions.
>>15887618>a totally necessary "study" was needed to confirm what everyone can obviously see ACKadummia is dead.
>>15887772>But it is less of an issue in the physical sciences.We wish lol. Chemistry is inundated with fraud and so is biology.
>>15887772>Mathematics, for example, is stable.Math really doesn't rely that much on reality anyways.
Wow, would political activists posing as scientists for clout really just lie in order to try and selfishly shill their unwanted political agenda on everyone?
>>15890760the really funny part is they go through to whole charade of getting data just in order to go to the further trouble of selectively excluding the data they don't like in order to justify getting the results that they wanted. they could have just skipped a a couple steps and gone directly to the results
anons I need your help, I have an assignment on operations research due tomorrow and I cant figure how to solve itI have only done the first step and I'm not sure if it is correctDecision Variables:x1: Amount allocated to the First Home Mortgage Loans. x2: Amount allocated to Second Home Mortgage Loans.x3: Amount allocated to Personal Consumer Loans. x4: Amount allocated to Small Business Loans. x5: Amount allocated to Business Investment Loans.Objective Function: - Maximization of the total profit, therefore -max(Z = 0.05x1 + 0.08x2 + 0.12x3 + 0.10x4 + 0.14x5)Constraints: Total Budget Constraint: x1 + x2 + x3 + x4 + x5 <= 1000000000Housing Loans Constraint: x1 >= 0.45 x (x1 + x2)Business Investment Loans Constraint: 0.10 * 1000000000 <= x5 <= 0.25 * 1000000000First Home Mortgage Loans constraint: x1 >= 0.60 * (x1 + x2)Personal Consumer Loans Constraint: x3 <= 0.15 * 1000000000Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
maybe you have a learning disability
>>15891445>filtered by financemaybe management us more your speed
Any PhDs on this board? How does this happen? I was under the impression that grad students were paid.
>>15890641Oh nooooooooooooo… anyway, back to business as usual
>>15890641>afirmative action pushes people with low IQs beyond their capability level incurring heavier costs that they are unable to repay
>>15890641>How does this happen?You carry debt from your undergrad.>I was under the impression that grad students were paid.PhDs often basically get paid minimum wage. That's not enough to pay off student debt.
America, once the land of the free, now the land of "gibes me dat fo free"
PhD in USA is just MSc in europe. They have to pay it themselves lol
Who is the mathematics guy?
>>15882685how's it going so far?
>>15884061Yes! Tooker for number theory!>>15882551He actually does look like a student advisor.
>>15884092kek
>>15884092he should be in the gender studies department
>>15890761He should be, but he is on sabbatical this year, apparently he has decided to lock himself in a cabin in the wood and spend the time jacking off to his autogynephiliac fantasy life
Can you explain what that line/phenomenon is over the moon? It moved horizontally across it, in around 15-20 seconds.
>people here are now perplexed by a contrailPeasant brain tier, just nuke this board already, it actively makes people more retarded
>>15890396Neat. Thanks for explaining, that must be it.>>15890402In person it looked like nothing I've seen before.
>>15890373>>15890396>>15890402these are Chemtrails lmao, nice try otherwise shlomo NEXT
>>15890381The sky moves pretty quickly.
>>15890414Are you sure that it was that fast? The sky turns by a moon diameter in two minutes.
Saunders MacLane editionpreviously >>15853575According to a coworker, in ZF with negated C you can construct a finite set of positive integers with no least element. Set theory is retarded.
>>15889751Just to fill in the gap, it's not true for monoids. Consider the free monoids on two letters and then quotient out the identities [math]x^2 y[/math] and [math]yx^2[/math].
>>15891014You are mab transgender. Good luck out there.
>>15890278no.
>>15890278>>15888015
>>15890980>2^infinity is larger than infinity^2, and yeah 2^infinity is the same as the amount of real numbersyeah makes perfect sense
Are the fact checkers on Twitter scientifically correct about turkeys being potential man eaters?
>>15887336People who claim to like animals more than they like humans are people who think humans are lower than animals, they are horrible misanthropes and they want you do die.
what's the point of the context thing if it's just going to be used like this?
>>15882693That shouldn't be hard to test. Just cut a human into smaller pieces and see if turkeys eat them.
>>15890718It's not that humans are lower than other animals. Some are great, but some are users who only seem concerned with deceiving and benefitting themselves. Dogs and cats just seem happy to be alive most of the time.
>>15890778>I know what animals are thinkingpure projection you are mentally ill if you think you can read animal's minds, their mental landscape is far too different from ours, but you just presume you can anyway because it has a face. let me guess, dolphins are always happy, right?
The Deepest We Have Ever Seen Into the Sun | SDO 4K : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6EbuAEagQj4How viewing the Sun in ultraviolet can uncover its secrets.
Wow aren't these 'photos' of the sun so pretty lmao
>>15891379That's a weird looking star, for sure..
These are just some frames in the video.There's some interesting stuff to observe.>>15891376>>15891378>>15891382
>>15891379This prank would've been more effective if he placed the chorizo over a flashlight. You can see how its surface shines from the fat, and that ruins the illusion.
>More and more mountains each year have humans blow up large snowpacks to reduce avalanches and “improve safety” for idiotic skiers.>But this is a completely un-natural phenomenon, and it’s done to keep people “safe”, not for any other reason.>If that snow was allowed to naturally accumulate, it would help to keep the air cold. And leave more mass for the formation of glaciers.>It would also melt much more slowly at higher elevations, compared to lower elevations where it’s warmer.Has there ever been a study on the impact of avalanche control and how terrible it is for mountain ecosystems/climate?
>>15855714oh.
>>15876900>government: theres too much greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere >also government: we're gonna blow up the world's largest methane pipeline and release all the gas in to the atmosphere
>>15887566It just proves they don't believe anything they say.
Removing mass from high elevations and bringing that mass to low elevations also changes the Earth's rotational velocity, making days shorter
>>15890768thats mostly true, but the effect changes with latitude
