Self-serve ads are available again! Check out our new advertising page here.
Go /p/ro: • Please post images that are JPG format and ideally smaller than 1 MB, and/or about 1000 pixels on the longest side. • Expect to be judged harshly. Learn to deal with it. Want: • We come here for photos, so post yours as often as possible, even if "image unrelated" to your text. • "Flickr/500px/Tumblr/Facebook/Portfolio" threads are for critique and networking. • Use "Recent Photos" threads if you are shy or only want to post a couple of photos. • Shared raw files which we can collectively edit for discussion of post-processing techniques, are encouraged. • Use the Catalog to consolidate similar topics (photographic themes, images or technical gear threads). Do not want: • Go to /wsr/ or /r/ for specific Photoshop requests. • Gear threads are discouraged, but identified as necessary. Many users simply hide these threads. Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Anybody else here do drone photography? What do you fly, post your pics?I'm gonna grab some breakfast and fly around in this shitty overcast morning, anything you guys wanna see pics of?
>>3865915Need some burgerbros to weigh in here, no idea about US laws.EU drone laws also have this grace period where one will be able to use Air2/Air2S in a category that sort of allows flying more or less close to people until 2023, then it's 150 meters minimum for them. I don't much like pestering people but it still was a dealbreaker for me, wouldn't want to always be on a lookout for an overeager cop in case they start enforcing this (they really don't these days, I hear the regulations are still messy and fresh enough that they're not sure of them themselves. Went with Mini 2 as a result, has the least restrictions. No question that Air 2 is better in almost everything else. Still, 2023 is far enough for some not to worry about it, they can fly the thing for years and sell it (though the price would probably go down a lot by then).
>>3850864do only chinese companies make this shit?
>>3866125They make the best shit at the moment and they make all the components for the expensive custom companies.Blame your daddy and his workmates that were able to outsource to get better bonuses at the cost of a weaker country.
air 2s shows up tomorrow through fedex :) hope it shows before sundown so I can fly it for a little bit
Blast from the past editionOld thread: >>3861192>All discussion and questions related to gear should take place in this exact thread>Redirect other gear-related threads to this thread>Remember to be polite.>This is the thread in which you can be a gearfag[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePENTAXCamera ModelPENTAX K-5Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS5 WindowsPhotographerBrian J DaviesSensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution120 dpiVertical Resolution120 dpiImage Created2013:11:19 08:09:55Exposure Time1 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width758Image Height720RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastHardSaturationNormalSharpnessHardSubject Distance RangeMacro
DJI needs to get their shit together, they're getting wrcked by nerds in the schience lab.
>>3866301DJI will trickle out minor improvements and you will buy every one with your USD
is a7iii ok for video? tik tok especially
>>3865819It should be at least half as small though
>>3866307You only need a <5yr old phone for tiktok
I recently got my hands on a Canon M50 and an EF-M 22mm f/2 STM. Is there anything else I should get for it? Any specific accessories or lens? Or should I sell it and use the money to get another camera that is better for cinematography and photography?
>>3865675Get a converter for FD lenses. Costs like 15 bucks, and FD lenses are comparatively dirt-cheap.
>>3866220What are your requirements? A BMPCC 4k is going to be a PoS for you if you need tracking autofocus. A Canon RP is going to be trash for you if you need 4k.
>>3866220Probably G85 or a6400.
Hi OP.I had the original EOS M for 6 years with the 22. Have had the M50 for 3 years now. I was a teen and lusted for the new sexy Fuji cameras and frequented these boards a lot, but held my tongue. (as the cameras exploded in popularity in the mainstream)Somehow, even with that dumpster fire camera; I learned to love merits seldom discussed online. In the M50’s case it’s the light weight. It nails focus quickly and 95% accurately. If you have an odd color like mine you’ll look like a tourist so people don’t pay attention to your photo taking. The menus are decipherable without a PhD in Ancient Hieroglyphs. It has enough dials to somewhat quickly operate it. It’s inexpensive, so go nuts with it.Anyway, the 32 mm is great if you can find it used for $350 ish. The 55-200 is very fun as well. It may lack some features you’re looking for depending on the cinematography. Even then, the original M is popular since it supports magic lantern.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Mix 2.8.1Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1000Image Height1000Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>3866302this color is kino desu
Sup /p/I stumbled across this 6x6 MF Nikon camera online and nearly jizzed my pants as I thought no such thing existed. But I can't find any info about it, only pics with the included fisheye, but doesn't anyone know if my regular F mount lenses will work on this?
Found a little bit more here: http://www.nicovandijk.net/fish.htm>ikon Corporation is the first optical industry that produced a fish-eye lens for photography. In 1938 it produced a lens for meteorological research with an viewing angle of 180 degrees. Based on this lens a special fish-eye camera was introduced in July 1960; with a lens of 16mm. focal length and a maximum aperture of f/8. In 1962 followed by the world´s first fish-eye lens for a single lens reflex camera. In July 2003 the AF DX Fish-eye Nikkor 2.8-10.5 mm. G-ED was introduced.>As mentioned before this camera was introduced in July 1960. The camera had a Seikosha SLV #0 shutter (B, 1-1/500th. sec.) and a built-in fish-eye lens 8/16.3mm. (5 lenses in 4 groups) with a diagonal viewing angle of 189 degrees. The lens was a fix-focus type with aperture settings of f/8, f/11 and f/16. The lens produced an circular image (50mm diameter) on a 120-roll film (6x6cm.). It is unclear how many cameras were build in a production period of nearly one year. Some cameras could be ordered with a motor drive with an interval time button, making it possible to make pictures at intervals of 5 - 180 minutes. The latter model is extremely rare.
>>3865179>what are you basing that on?it states very clearly here that it's a purpose built camera for taking pictures of clouds with a fixed lens on the specification tab
looks like a hass swc
>>3865090>MF Nikonhttp://camera-wiki.org/wiki/Bronica_lenses
The cloud camera is mentioned here too:https://www.pacificrimcamera.com/pp/nikonslr6f56.htm
Just got one of these for $25, what lenses will fit?
>>3866139How did they become exempt?
>>3866144They have moved to film point and shoots. Most SLR lenses are tax-exempt now.
>>3866144They found out about the 80-200 F/2.8
>>3866083>what lenses will fit?You pretty much can't go wrong with any A-mount lens. Just avoid the shutter cap and Xi lenses and you will be fine..>>3866100>If you can find a Minolta (or Sony) 135mm f/2.8 STF, that's a legendary, Godlike piece of portrait glass, and nothing like it exists for any other system.Didn't Sony release a modern STF for e-mount?
>>3866100>STF>smooth trans focus >trans KekPretty sure the nikkor DC is better though[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width554Image Height554Scene Capture TypeStandard
Only professionals should be buying standalone cameras nowadays.Hobbyists should just buy a decent phone, it has more features than just a camera and nowadays the camera on a phone is almost indistinguishable to that of a high end camera.It can even do great bokeh effects through the use of ai like in pic relatedOnly down side is you can't change lenses but there are many settings and multi camera setups to fix this nowadays
>>3862658I agree, but I strongly disagree.
f1.8, do you think?
tack sharp?
>>3866043(image)
>>3862658This is your example of "great bokeh effects"? It looks fucking terrible
The pandemic is ending any second now... edition All video related questions and discussion is intended for this thread. Here we discuss techniques, gear and anything else related to capturing video footage. Please don't pretend to be an expert if you don't know what you're talking about. Kindly leave your ego at the door. Posting short films/scripts or other work you've done is encouraged. We tend to use and recommend DSLRs/mirrorless cameras because they provide phenomenal picture quality for their price, have large sensors (ie the same size used in high-end cinema cameras and higher) and have interchangeable lenses. In contrast, consumer camcorders normally have much smaller sensors and a fixed lens. >STICKY - https://pastebin.com/35u6DcnF >Helpful guide, additional books and more in-depth FAQs - https://web.archive.org/web/20200926115310/https://pastebin.com/kG0gRmTZ >NO ONE CARES WHAT AN EXPERT YOU THINK YOU ARE. IF YOU’RE ASKING BASIC-AS-SHIT QUESTIONS, YOU CAN’T BE ALL THAT GREAT. SEE ABOVE Previous thread >>3836187 Quick FAQS >what’s the best camera available on a “budget”?Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>3853817>wife
>>3865103i use tom bolles cineprint16 to get this kinda look -- though i must warn you1. i am a total noob when it comes to video/grading (i probs shouldn't even give advice), and cineprint promised to get me "that look" quickly, so i bought it. i bet you could achieve the results without buying ANYTHING so up to you really2. i apply the preset but it looks SO BAD that i need to tweak absolutely every stage of it in resolve to make it work. so there is still a lot of work involvedbut yeah here's the latest example i used it on and i think it looks pretty good (gh5, sigma 18-35, probably 100iso, f1.8):https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMs3rig9-2M>pic related is the original image out of the camera(also if anyone could help me know what is wrong with my music product, i would appreciate it, cos we started 3 months ago and have not gotten an audience at all. sometimes i think the music's not good enough but other times i think i'm just not attractive enough to be successful. any criticism would help)
>>38659021. It's going to be hard to pull a natural looking image with those mixed colored lights2. You're overexposed. Turn on zebras and protect your highlights
>>3865906thank you for giving directed and actionable feedback, i've never thought to use that tool in a situation like this but ur totally right. thank u anon
>>3865902>overexposed>try getting at the same level as the musician because your video looks like what you see when your are in the bar, from the bottom.>activate ibis or find some sort of tripod>get your zoom-dezoom smoother
sup /p/, for a while I've been taking pictures with what's known as the "x-pan" crop format (65:24) cropped from a conventional sensor. It has recently occurred to me that it would be nice to share them in a dedicated thread, although you might have seen some of them previously on /rpt/ where I contribute occasionally. I hope you will share my indulgence in this wide format as you view my work.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-Pro3Camera SoftwareCapture One 21 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.4Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiExposure Time1/500 secF-Numberf/3.2Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating2500Lens Aperturef/3.2Brightness1.6 EVExposure Bias-1 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceShadeFlashNo FlashFocal Length16.00 mmImage Width3440Image Height1270RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessHardSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>3847129The fog really brings this one all together, I always wish I lived in a location where it was more common, it seems to always bring a look i quite enjoy to every shot.
>>3858773Pretty much this.
>>3858773>This from a board that tolerates that guy endlessly taking blurry photos of trees.That tree thread is better tailored than this, having a photo thread where the only trait shared is it's aspect ratio along with circlejerkers thinking it makes every snapshit a masterpiece. This thread is reddit101.
I don't know what write here. Just rate a photo.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeHUAWEICamera ModelBKK-L21Camera SoftwareBKK-L21 8.2.0.140(C10)Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)26 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width4160Image Height2048Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:04:16 18:04:07Exposure Time72719/1000000000 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating112Lens Aperturef/1.8Brightness0 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length3.60 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4160Image Height2048RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>3866169>t.butthurt[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1054Image Height1500Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Pixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:04:18 09:54:26Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width659Image Height659
>>3866178Thanks. What don't you like about the second one? Is it cliche or something? I'm a shitty amateur so idk.
>>3866133>a reply to garbage needs a photo
>>3866147the point is to inform you that switching to another hobby would be a good idea
>>3866280>>3866292cheers, thanks for your critique lads. I've gone ahead and put my camera on ebay so I can take up full-time gear posting instead
I've gone through 2 Minolta x700s and 2 Nikon FEs, I'm tired of these old cameras breaking. I don't even abuse them, I just leave them on the shelf and when I pick them up a month later they are broken. All I want is:1. A light meter2. Aperture priority3. Manual mode.4. Compact size. Nikon F series it too big. 5. Affordable lenses.6. More reliable. Does such a thing exist?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpi
What makes mamiya cameras so popular? Are they worth the hype tax?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution144 dpiVertical Resolution144 dpiImage Width750Image Height913
>>3866268Dunno just a feeling; iPhone generated film name, an uninteresting laydown of two cameras. Seems like the standard /p/ roundabout way to flex your MF gear.
>>3866269I wouldn’t exactly call those two plastic cameras a flex. Also isn’t that a screenshot file name?
>>3866259Why not?
>>3866232Sure, but they were cheaper at one point and developed this hype as "sleeper" cameras that then translated into hype without the sleeper part.
>>3866196>RB67 is all of the fun of a Hassy or a Kiev 88 without the taxIsn't the Kiev 88 the cheapest of the bunch?
Old comfy flowers thread is full. >>3844238 Post some more comfy in here.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareCapture One 21 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Width2304Image Height1728
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 6DFirmware VersionFirmware Version 1.1.9Lens NameEF50mm f/1.8 STMImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:04:17 13:46:43Exposure Time1/4000 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityLens Aperturef/2.8Exposure Bias1 EVFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width5472Image Height3648RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeAv-PriorityFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeISO Speed RatingAutoSharpnessUnknownSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeManualImage SizeLargeFocus ModeAI FocusDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingFineMacro ModeNormalWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation6Sensor ISO Speed192Color Matrix135
>>3864122stop down lol
>>3866186You're right, I should have.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera ModelILCE-7M2Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 6.2.0 (Android)Equipment MakeSONYMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Image Width2048Image Height1366Image Created2021:03:29 19:39:22Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternExposure ProgramAperture PriorityExposure Time1/200 secISO Speed Rating100FlashNo FlashLight SourceUnknownBrightness2.1 EV
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.Camera ModelXZ-1Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Color Filter Array Pattern700Focal Length (35mm Equiv)112 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2021:04:17 17:38:50Exposure Time1/200 secF-Numberf/2.5Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/2.5Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, AutoFocal Length24.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingCustomExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-T4Camera SoftwareCapture One 20.0.4 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.2Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)84 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiExposure Time1/2000 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating250Lens Aperturef/2.8Brightness6.9 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length56.00 mmImage Width1664Image Height1664RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
10 years from now, do you think mirrorless medium format is going to become popular and be an affordable (~$1.5k) option? It seems like a no-brainer that that's where the big companies should invest in because personally, being an APS-C owner, I don't see any point in upgrading to FF since the difference is not worth it IMO... But medium format would definitely be noticeable.
look! Here too!
>>3866003They say large negative, like people say large sensor when talking about one inch compact cameras. It doesn't say large format, because they know that'd be laughable.
>>3866075Suuuuuuuure
>>3866005>First off, “anything larger than 35mm but smaller than 4x5” is the definition of medium format that I’ve always heardthis is a demonstration of your own arrogance, it's been established that 127 was never considered medium format>who do you think would be responsible for changing that definition?ISO you moron>You seem to be claiming that you, personally, are the one in charge of the decision on what it’s called. That’s not the case.not at all, by entire premise was pro-definition, not being dictated by social norms, I've given an example for that and you're only displaying your dissonance if you choose to ignore it
>>3866003large size is arbitrary and not wrong because its relative, large format is a standard, hassleblad doesn't claim to be large format
>>3858564limit reached[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7M2Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)20 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2021:04:13 23:34:58Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/2.8Brightness3.3 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length20.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
Newb here. How do you get decent long exposure night photos? 30 sec, f/3.5, 1600 ISOI know part of the issue is not having a wide angle lens, but still. My canon DSLR can't do long exposure and autofocus.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XSLens Size18.00 - 55.00 mmFirmware VersionFirmware Version 1.0.5Serial Number1720300085Lens NameEF-S18-55mm f/3.5-5.6Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:04:14 00:39:57Exposure Time30 secF-Numberf/3.5Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/3.5Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length18.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2816Image Height1880RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeManualFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeSharpnessUnknownSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeManualImage SizeMediumFocus ModeAI ServoDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingFineMacro ModeNormalWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed288Color Matrix132
>>3866234gotta manual focus to get those stars sharp bruvi don't think they give off enough light to work well with atuofocus
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelSM-G960WCamera SoftwareG960WVLS7CSK1Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.5Sensing MethodNot DefinedFocal Length (35mm Equiv)26 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width4032Image Height3024Image OrientationRight-Hand, TopHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2020:01:29 12:24:44Exposure Time1/3648 secF-Numberf/1.5Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating50Lens Aperturef/1.5Brightness8.9 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo FlashFocal Length4.30 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4032Image Height3024Exposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardUnique Image IDH12QSKF00SM H12QSKL01VA
>>3865978I really dont like any of these, its not the colors, the compositions are just bad
>>3865953expired Fortia SP film performed wonderfully
