Go /p/ro: • Please post images that are JPG format and ideally smaller than 1 MB, and/or about 1000 pixels on the longest side. • Expect to be judged harshly. Learn to deal with it. Want: • We come here for photos, so post yours as often as possible, even if "image unrelated" to your text. • "Flickr/500px/Tumblr/Facebook/Portfolio" threads are for critique and networking. • Use "Recent Photos" threads if you are shy or only want to post a couple of photos. • Shared raw files which we can collectively edit for discussion of post-processing techniques, are encouraged. • Use the Catalog to consolidate similar topics (photographic themes, images or technical gear threads). Do not want: • Go to /wsr/ or /r/ for specific Photoshop requests. • Gear threads are discouraged, but identified as necessary. Many users simply hide these threads. Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Zeiss Loxia 85 mm edition
>>4135455street is dead>npc drones on phones
>>4135455Who said you can't take moments? You're the one who limiting yourself.
>>4135455>Isn't street all about capturing the momentStreet is about capturing the urban landscape with its denizens as protagonists or as scale references.It's not about candid shit like the french weirdos said 60 years later.
>>4135455If you had a favorable early life and zero respect for the people around you.White people are drawn to this idea of street because it absolves them of work, talent etc. But you don't have the early life to pull it off.
>>4135455What the point of moment if you only take pic of their back lol.If you're that socially awkward just pay a bloody model for your photoshoots and be done with it.
Some old photo i foundanyone has any idea what the store in the image is?
3D
>>4135371It's open on sundays, so some satanist child-diddling operation going on in there
the blurry sign seems to have a clueD.....D.....D..... if you can read that, you should be able to fugure it out
searchin "3D Department store logo blue 3 red d" yielded a clue on faceberg, but it is getting flagged as spam.
DannersDiscountDepartment
Graphic editionAll video related questions and discussion is intended for this thread. Here we discuss techniques, gear and anything else related to capturing video footage. Please don't pretend to be an expert if you don't know what you're talking about. Kindly leave your ego at the door.Posting short films/scripts or other work you've done is encouraged.We tend to use and recommend DSLRs/mirrorless cameras because they provide phenomenal picture quality for their price, have large sensors (ie the same size used in high-end cinema cameras and higher) and have interchangeable lenses.In contrast, consumer camcorders normally have much smaller sensors and a fixed lens.>STICKY -https://textbin.net/2u146abxla>Helpful guide, additional books and more in-depth FAQs - https://web.archive.org/web/20200926115310/https://pastebin.com/kG0gRmTZ>NO ONE CARES WHAT AN EXPERT YOU THINK YOU ARE. IF YOU’RE ASKING BASIC-AS-SHIT QUESTIONS, YOU CAN’T BE ALL THAT GREAT. SEE ABOVEPrevious thread >>4104205Quick FAQSComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4134924>completely useless but glad i found itit seems i've found the old guard
I’m still upset over this. If they got rid of the lcd snd sold it for 300-600 this would have been a mega smash hitWhy is no other company making these?.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution216 dpiVertical Resolution216 dpiImage Width1170Image Height1223
>>4135600It’s easier to sell a set of filters to instantly make iPhone videos “film quality”
>>4135600>$3000 for a camera that requires you to buy constant physical film to use, produces a soft image, has no lowlight or interchangeable lenses, and is a bitch to edit when you actually get your expensive footageGee, I can't imagine why this idea doesn't seem more popular...
>>4135642>produces a soft image, has no lowlight or interchangeable lenses, and is a bitch to edit when you actually get your expensive footageyou could've just said a super-8 camera
Rodi editionA thread dedicated to the discussion of all things film and film cameras!
>>4135389unless he captures the steam, that's literally distilled water.
>>4135013>what's the downsideYou need to buy some distilled water do to the action that could be done with regular water.As for me this is nothing but downside.In general distilled water is ok, I'm diluting long term chemicals in it. Anyway Adoflo I dilute in drinking water (filtered tap water).
>>4135458>sunstarare you trying to shoot at f16 at night? rowdy.
>>4135617Any problems with that?
>>4135669no it's just hard, but now that i think about it, shooting 3 stops different you'd still need a tripod i guess.
Bought an old digital camera to snap pics on walks. Having fun so far. Some are learner mode snap shits. Maybe I'll become advanced enough to post my own gear thread someday.Can post uncropped raws if there is interest. I certainly need improvements on edits and crops.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKONCamera ModelCOOLPIX P7100Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 6.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2023:02:03 17:27:43Exposure Time8 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias-0.3 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length6.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
Probably enough for now.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
but what kind of noob post would this be without a lamp post?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
>>4135630good on ya>>4135643>>4135654>>4135662 (absolutely noob without lamppost)i liek keep posting moar, best thread in a while
>>4135636This is some ai stuff at least a rendered image, no? I'm feeling startled to uneasy - calling the uncanny valley.>>4135630A matter that's enjoyed by /p/. Mute colors, simplicity in what's shown. Have a look in new topo or Egglestone, if you're into that. For /p/ you should've straightened the verticals - I'm in doubt whether that's necessary.>>4135637Did you say newb? I see it may be easy, yet it's good!>>4135638You're right on Suger's heels! :) Please someone link or post Sugar's shot.>>4135680>keep posting moar
Previous >>4112986Let's see your low resolution shitcam shots. Old cell phone pics, early digital cameras, crap cams, etc. all apply, let's see how much art can come from horrible hardware.I just bought a Vtech Kidizoom 1.3mp with a 16GB card, and it's a fun point and shoot for what it is. Quality is terrible, but it's a good challenge to work with.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeVTechCamera ModelKidizoom cameraImage-Specific Properties:
>>4135664[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKONCamera ModelE7600Camera SoftwareE7600v1.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)38 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created0000:00:00 00:00:00Exposure Time1/190 secF-Numberf/4.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating50Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length7.80 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3072Image Height2304RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownColor ModeCOLORImage QualityNORMALWhite BalanceAUTOImage SharpeningAUTOFocus ModeAF-SISO SelectionAUTOImage AdjustmentNORMALLens AdapterOFFAuto FocusCenterSaturationNormalNoise ReductionOFF
>>4135668[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKONCamera ModelE7600Camera SoftwareE7600v1.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)38 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created0000:00:00 00:00:00Exposure Time2/353 secF-Numberf/4.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating50Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length7.80 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3072Image Height2304RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownColor ModeCOLORImage QualityNORMALWhite BalanceAUTOImage SharpeningAUTOFocus ModeAF-SISO SelectionAUTOImage AdjustmentNORMALLens AdapterOFFAuto FocusRightSaturationNormalNoise ReductionOFF
>>4134670Nice. I've been doing these through-the-car-window shots at car shows lately too. Fun aesthetic.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot S500Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.4 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.2Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2023:02:04 13:22:54Exposure Time1/400 secF-Numberf/3.2ISO Speed Rating50Lens Aperturef/3.2Exposure Bias-1 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length9.09 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4135673[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKONCamera ModelE7600Camera SoftwareE7600v1.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)38 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created0000:00:00 00:00:00Exposure Time2/93 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating50Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length7.80 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3072Image Height2304RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownColor ModeCOLORImage QualityNORMALWhite BalanceAUTOImage SharpeningAUTOFocus ModeAF-SISO SelectionAUTOImage AdjustmentNORMALLens AdapterOFFAuto FocusCenterSaturationNormalNoise ReductionOFF
>>4130784is this low res enough lol
I know its going to be Canon, because I like the ergo. I love my EOS20D, Perfect ergo. Its time to upgrade though.Budget is 1.6kMost ideal choice seems like EOS R, but no IBIS and old.Second choice is what R8 might be (if leak is true), but no IBIS.Thought of R7, but like low light photography and its a cropped sensor, which is the past.R6 is too expensive.Thoughts? Kinda feel like keep shooting at 8mp and keep waiting.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 20DFirmware VersionFirmware 1.0.5Owner NameunknownSerial Number0520311412Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2023:01:28 21:23:14Exposure Time0.4 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramShutter PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0.7 EVFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3504Image Height2336RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeTv-PriorityFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeSharpnessUnknownSaturationUnknownContrastNormalShooting ModeManualImage SizeLargeFocus ModeOne-ShotDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingFineMacro ModeNormalFlash Bias-0.62 EVWhite BalanceFluorescentExposure Compensation5Sensor ISO Speed160Image Number182-8268Color Matrix0
>>4135671I heard. Not sure how that will impact me. Sadge nonetheless.Looks like R8 is going to be vlogger product also, so likely no viewfinder. They are definitely testing new waters.
>>4135674If you're using a high MP camera to take images for 4chan and instagram, you may think that, but you may also use literally anything for that application.
>>4135676Generally pretty happy with the full sized output after processing the raws as well under those terms, even pixel peeping them. Granted, it's feasible maybe I'm more comfortable with or better at using certain noise reduction techniques than others (Darktable affords you a lot more fine tuning than LR/C1 after all), or also simply can tolerate more in an image (imo luma noise can be totally ignorable or even flattering, as long as I stomp out any visible chroma), who knows.
>>4135675Well, you just need the perspective of someone getting in, then it sucks. You want to avoid the adapter and are reluctant to build a system with a former, rather than the current mount. However, the current version is an expensive proposition for which a cheaper used market has yet to be established, and there are some gaps in the offering as Canon initially intended to add new things rather than replace lenses directly, taking into account the existing EF system. Kinda all credit and loyalty to their user base. But you seem to be screwed if you are new.
>>4135682Yeah, exactly that. I have 2 cheap lenses, so its not a factor moving forward.Which is why it looks like buying EOS R now and then in a few years upgrading to whatever (if even needed) is the best idea.Maybe thats why R prices are not budging, it is that one affordable entry mirrorless FF Canon.
>the best film photographer on YouTube is some 35 year old architectural nerd who dresses like a cowboy and uses math for photography
>>4135127>rear display eye-piece and liveviewdo DSLRcucks really? why do they seethe at mirrorless then try to imitate it in such an archaic way?
>>4134816I appreciate Carver and respect his commitment to what it is that he does and I will continue to follow him but I just don't think he has a talent for picking his subject matter nor his perspective. I'm sorry to say that because, again, I do like him in a general photography sense. I just don't think he's talented. I mean, he's limited by the equipment he uses, of course, so his perspective is often forced into this little windowbox of where he can even physically setup and spend his autistic amount of time doing whatever autistic things he has going on in his head but it often just doesn't lend itself to an interesting photograph, despite it's cleanliness or true to life feeling. I guess what I'm trying to say is that he's a gearfag, just a wannabe old-timey gearfag. And that there's nothing really special to his work other than he's an old-timey gearfag who acts like an old-timey gearfag. And an old-timey gearfag can just as much a gearfag as a new gearfag. Ya feel me?
>>4135338I can't believe you spent effort to write this shit
>>4135338Coping because he doesn’t take random photos of strangers in new york
>>4135338He's a gearfag or a wannabe gearfag? You can't have it both ways.
I present to you retards like Joe Greer, who will then pay 5k to dev and scan these cause he's too lazy to buy a delving setup to do it himself.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image Created2023:02:03 18:04:45Time (UTC)17:15:09Date (UTC)2023:02:03
i stopped shooting film because i felt like an idiot for wasting so much of it.
>>4135541I stopped shooting film because I was sick of paying a premium to use an inferior imaging technology.I might 3d print a technical camera later and shoot the odd sheet but I'm not touching anything under 6x7 if I can help it.
>>4135572Yeah sure you will nophoto lmao
>>4135620Go spend $30 on another roll of velvia filmtard
>>4135572>inferiorkekbayertards as usual
September 2022[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelDSC-RX100M7Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.30Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.0Focal Length (35mm Equiv)56 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2023:01:31 20:21:05Exposure Time1/1000 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating100Brightness10.2 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, AutoFocal Length20.69 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width5472Image Height3648RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4133295Tried to take pictures of the northern lights, I don't know how to do it with my camera. Took some ok pictures with my iphone.>>4133260Yeah, almost no tress in Iceland
>only white peoplesWhere is the diversity???!It should be called WhitesLand not iceland.
>>4133404I rented a car from Alamo in Keflavik , the manager was a nigger.
>>4133404Iceland is full of blonde girls, it's amazing.
>>4132973Your'e brain lee
Sup fuckers. Borrowing my boss’s Nikon d750 made me consider buying a camera. I want something that can do astrophotographer shit if possible, but I really just want to be able to take pro/frame-able pics of national parks. Don’t want to spend more than 1k. $400 Is target budget. I know nothing about cameras. Any advice?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationRight-Hand, TopHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4032Image Height3024Scene Capture TypeStandard
can someone explain to me what is the deal with astro? You are literally shooting far away specks of light that look exactly the same to everyone on Earth at any time. There is no composition, no creative exposure modes (stars are either correctly exposed and tracked or they are not) and there is nothing that hasn't bren photographed before in a better way with better equipment
>>4135618The Milky Way is cool, I guess? It’s weird and kind of gay to buy star shots instead of taking one? Sorry I even brought it up.
>>4135603Great advice, thanksStill open to other suggestions as well
>>4135625dunno, sounds like buying an expensive measuring tool and then going to France to measure the standard meter
>>4135618you can stack images with zoom lenses and telescopes to get objects the naked eye can't see. You can also play around with foreground objects, trees, mountains, etc for composition and framing. I used to do timelapse on a moving rail. Many things to explore. Though I'm assuming you were just neg posting.If you're somewhere you can shoot the milkyway, you are probably in a beautiful location. >>4135625don't be sorry anon, astrophotography is good shit[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
So, i want to get into Photography. I recently got some money for spending purposes for myself and i want to get myself a nice camera. Then again, i kinda have no idea what i should be looking for. What i want to do:-Scenery, like landscapes-small objects like flowers-Animals, so it should have good zoom-rechargeable battery pack, so i can just plug it into a powerbank when i forget to recharge itWould really appreciate any kind of help. Budget would be around 1000 - 1200 bucks[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>4135621photography isn't real art. you can learn everything as you go and nothing is wasted, you at least get the memories. and as art it relies on the foundation of truth. even a mediocre photograph by academic art student wank can be famous because of what's in it.
>>4135612used Nikon Z5 and a 28/2.8 or 40/2, does everything you need within your budget, also post photos
>>4135629sorry except zoom but you can buy a zoom lens later in life, FTZ + 80-200 or something will be around 700-1000 more, or just get the P series camera with the fixed zoom lens, great for everything
>>4135612Bridge camera
>>4135624ok, good luck in shooting decent photos 10 years from now without ever understanding the exposure triangle
How often do you change metering modes and how important is it to you?For my understanding any falsely set metering mode could still be changed in post, but please correct me if I'm wrong
It mattered a lot more when cameras were kind of shit or you were shooting color film, especially slidesThese days every camera over $500 has enough dynamic range and enough bit depth in its raws to spot meter for the brightest thing you don't want to be solid white, press the AEL button or fiddle with your settings to make that very light gray, and keep your camera there until the light changes
>>4135591>For my understanding any falsely set metering mode could still be changed in post, but please correct me if I'm wrongOnly to a limited extent. Anything dramatically overexposed or underexposed will be lost. RAW files offer more room for exposure correction. JPG files are pretty limited there. Exposure is different from white-balance, for which it practically doesn't matter in RAW whether it's set in-camera or in post-processing.You probably got triggered by one of my other posts where I've mentioned Evaluative, Matrix, Average and so on for a balanced metering, but also spot metering to measure for highlights or shadows.Metering plays an important role for me, which is why I change it often, as well as the exposure modes, also because I have a very broad spectrum in photography. I'd like it if all manufacturers (e.g. Canon) had zebras and highlight metering, I found it repeatedly useful with Sony.
>>4135591I never change metering modes, if metering is off, I just adjust exposure comp.
>>4135591I rarely change metering modes. I'll use evaluative most of the time, occasionally spot metering, or I'll bypass both and just shoot manual and use the histogram to judge exposure.
Reading >>4135602 I should probably add to >>4135604 why metering is important to me.I try to shoot in proper exposure for capturing (high quality, no clipping, little noise, no lost color information) but also constant exposure for a series of images so that batch editing allows me to edit many images in one go, with only a few images needing individual corrections. I often even set the white balance, shoot in constant exposure but varying depth of field. I try to shoot manually and correct with metering from time to time, but if the lighting conditions change too much and too quickly, I try to meter my exposure from fixed points, then often with spot metering. The Canon metering modes in the OP image are pretty much sorted, starting from the right with very manual metering but ease to achieve a uniform exposure, to the left, very variable and automatic metering but larger deviations in the exposure.
What is your travel kit? I’m going to Costa Rica next month, going to shoot wildlife, landscape, urban, my girlfriend in a bikini in front of beach scenes, waterfalls, etc. For my x-t2 I have a 35f1.4, 18f2, 70-300, 16f1.4, and 56f1.2. Will bring the 70-300 and maybe one other lens, possibly just the 16f1.4[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiCommentScreenshotColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width828Image Height1792Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4131525I can bring my own cutie, just gotta make her develop some tan lines and work at a beach-side snack stand and/or learn to fish from jetties
>>4129061You should get the 18-55mm and just take that and maybe the 35mm. Keep it simple.
>>4129061Seek help or ngmihttps://youtu.be/WslSHcTKk4Ehttps://youtu.be/cyeDYcH3I4Ihttps://youtu.be/lyjJ99ipXqw[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width575Image Height620Scene Capture TypeStandard
OM2n with 50mm 1.8 and 28mm 3.5. Cheap trip MD3 as backup. All fits in a small bag along with film and a few spare batteries. No expensive or rare kit that I would be upset about if it got stolen or damaged while travelling.
last trip, those old VC rolls were shot iso 80 since they were old (but still freezer stored before expiring) for a gig. also that point and shoot has been replaced with a fujifilm klasse.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand