Go /p/ro: • Please post images that are JPG format and ideally smaller than 1 MB, and/or about 1000 pixels on the longest side. • Expect to be judged harshly. Learn to deal with it. Want: • We come here for photos, so post yours as often as possible, even if "image unrelated" to your text. • "Flickr/500px/Tumblr/Facebook/Portfolio" threads are for critique and networking. • Use "Recent Photos" threads if you are shy or only want to post a couple of photos. • Shared raw files which we can collectively edit for discussion of post-processing techniques, are encouraged. • Use the Catalog to consolidate similar topics (photographic themes, images or technical gear threads). Do not want: • Go to /wsr/ or /r/ for specific Photoshop requests. • Gear threads are discouraged, but identified as necessary. Many users simply hide these threads. Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
I have some money sitting on my bank account and before I let it rot there I thought of buying a GFX. Always enjoyed my Fuji X cameras but whenever I checked some Flickr I found that the GFX pictures always have something "more". The level of detail and that depth they render is amazing. What I'm not sure about is to wether buy the GFX 50R which is the cheapest right now (around 3000€), the GFX 50S II which comes with IBIS or go all in and get the 100S. I kinda tend to the 50R and rather buy an additional lens instead. But can someone answer me the following? If I compare the exact same picture taken of the 50R and 100S on my computer screen.. what I note any difference? Does the 100S offer a better rendering or more detail? Sure if I zoom in probably or if I would do big prints.. but other than that? Is it worth twice the price?
>>3988997the 5dsr is a good camera and holds its own today. I'm getting a used one.
>>3991143Manual focus on dslr is aids compared to a proper split prism manual or mirrorless. You're delusional.
>>3991208Just change out your focusing screen bruh
>>3991244Show us the split image 1st party screens anon.
>>3991244Imagine using plastic chink aids in a d850
Canon editionOld thread >>3987661
>>3991214Nooooooooo, people shouldn't actually have involved conversations, NOOOOOOOOOOOO
My advice to Canon is to develop more power efficient components and drop the power cord nonsense.The R3 already has twice as much battery size as the A1. So as soon as Canon becomes power efficient, their Cipa rating will shoot up past 1200.
Do other cameras seem to overheat as much as canons. Even the new R6 has problems with overheating when used to record large video segments.
>>3991254It's been a common problem with Sony since forever.
post it in herejust got a h-alpha scope but weather is shit, I hate winter
I got into the astronomy/astrophotography hobby recently, and i have a shitton of questions to ask and a few imges to share.I got a camera for my telescope. It's a ASI120MC. I have some experience with optics, microscopy in particular but i know very little about cameras. So i thouh maybe some of you could help me.Pic is one i took of the sun yesterday.
Now here is my question. When i use the planetary photography part of ASI Studio, things like the sun or planets are nice and crisp, and there is little noise. But if i aim that at a deep sky object, even with longer exposures, i see basically nothing. If i use the deep sky imageing version of the program, i see deepsky objects quite nicely, even at lower exposures, but the images have this weird noise.What is that noise? How do i get rid of it?pic related, orion nebula with a lot of noise.
I also would like to stack these images, but the stacking software says i don't have enough stars (or to be precise it says there are 0 recogniseable stars). What optical elements may be reduiceing my FOW? Is there a way to fix that?pic rel is my setup right now. 80mm apo refractor, and there is an 800 tube at the end to increase the focal leangth (cant focus withoutthat or a zenith)
>>3991027>ASI120MCThat's an autoguider camera, it won't work for you for deep space objects.Get a proper camera for deep space
>>3989820Thanks man I wasn't aware of that one actually but it looks like I definitely should get down to Texas for that & hopefully I can get my hands on something 500mm or greater. I'll start planning.
They just overtaken Sony, stomped on Nikon and are quickly gaining even Canon.
>>3991090LOL
>>3991090Nikon died the day they stopped the F series lenses and started importing their production of cameras out of country.They got fucked by Canon, Fujifilm and even disappointingly... Sony.>>3991003Well, yeah... A company dedicated to the production of mirrorless cameras in a world of digital photography was bound to evolve anyway. Canon ending their SLR line with the 1Dx3 and Nikon with the D cameras was a fatal mistake.This isn't relevant for /p/, enough. Take it to /news/ or /biz/. This place fucking sucks.
>>3991003>3\4 of sales from a cheap rugged compact and Instax>Fuji actually at around 5% market share if we're talking about real cameras
>>3991003Holy shit Fujifilm is legit unstoppable. I might have to see what all the hype's about.
>>3991015based
"Photography is our exorcism. Primitive society had its masks, bourgeois society its mirrors. We have our images."— Jean Baudrillard[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Express (Android)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2022:01:22 22:48:34Color Space InformationsRGB
>>3991237What's your take on this?
>>3991239I think he believes we are still a primitive society that are extremely fearful of unknowns. Photography is our way to cope with our fears.In the end, it's just as stupid and irrational as masks used by hunter-gatherer people of the past. There's no progress at all.
I need a camera to fit this lens I bought for astrophotography anyone have any recommendations?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width640Image Height480
Canon and Nikon are really the only bodies that have good astro software support. Nearly every Nikon camera filters raw data. Not desirable for astrophotography. Canon cameras very rarely do. Get an R5, and use ISO 800 or greater (R5 disappointingly applies spatial filtering to raws below 800 iso).
>>3990922Thanks, canon seems like a good brandI am assuming cameras are like guns where most are decent but fanboys have to push their shit and ever company eventually makes a lemon
>>3990775did you buy your tracking mount $1500 yetbuy that first then get and and EOS Ra and M48 Adapter since money doesn't matter
Do you want to go big? Get a cooled camera from ZWO. You'll need a dedicated laptop and maybe a filter setup if you go monochrome. Oneshot you just need an appropriate light polution filter. Get a mount that allows autoguiding and get a short focal length guidescope and small monochrome camera from ZWO as well. Or you can just get a Ha modified camera or full spectrum camera from like Kolari or Lifepixel. I'm leaning towards a full spectrum Z6 ii so I can take IR photography and keep it as a mostly dedicated astrocamera. Might settle on Ha because UV/IR filters for every lense wouldn't be the best time. I don't know what the equivalent canon would be, but frankly it will hardly matter. You will eventually want a cooled camera because of just how little noise it can have even in summer. And if you really mind and plan on getting more telescopes, you mighr have to start checking what camera would fit your focal length best. Roughly, the longer the focal length, the larger the pixel size you want.I hate this hobby. It's the ultimate gearfag rabbithole.
>>3991248Nah I'm fine, thanks though
Portrait thread
>>3991240[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 600DCamera SoftwareMicrosoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2020:11:22 04:46:59Exposure Time1/1000 secF-Numberf/6.3Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating3200Lens Aperturef/6.4Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length200.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3456Image Height5184RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>3991241[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 600DCamera SoftwareMicrosoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2020:11:22 04:46:49Exposure Time1/1000 secF-Numberf/6.3Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating3200Lens Aperturef/6.4Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length200.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3456Image Height5184RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>3991242[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 600DImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2018:11:12 15:49:42Exposure Time1/1000 secF-Numberf/6.3Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating2000Lens Aperturef/6.4Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length36.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width5184Image Height3456RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>3991243[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 600DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.14 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution1080 dpiVertical Resolution1080 dpiImage Created2018:10:14 19:45:35Exposure Time1/4 secF-Numberf/16.0Exposure ProgramShutter PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/16.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
>>3991245[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 600DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.14 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution1080 dpiVertical Resolution1080 dpiImage Created2018:10:17 23:52:24Exposure Time1/4 secF-Numberf/10.0Exposure ProgramShutter PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/10.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4eKP3XvdvNA[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpi
>>3990628Touch grass anon
>>3990676you know he won't, it's illegal to leave his flat without a pass.
>>3987855>>3987853>>3987829>>3987549>>3987522>>3987521Amazing!
>>3990360>>3990361Fantastic
>>3987522Idk why but I can't stop looking at this one. Reminds me of an effigy mound
Need fast advice on some cameras i want to buy they are to mainly be used as photographical evidence of weird shit that i see and pretty landscapesFirst camera - fujifilm instax mini 40Second camera - fujifilm instax mini liplay[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAndroid RP1A.200720.012.A325FXXU1AUD7Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1080Image Height1478
>>39912052nd camera[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAndroid RP1A.200720.012.A325FXXU1AUD7Image-Specific Properties:Image Width963Image Height1436
>>3991205use the gear thread
>>3991215Ill use you if you dont shut up
>>3991232Why don't you try using a camera?
Drive My Car editionPrevious: >>3975948
>>3991030what's the difference in price for you between the xt2 and xt3?af on the xt2 seems perfectly fine: https://youtu.be/CvOdefSvhWU
>>3991050£200 difference. I think I will spend i for the improved VF. VF is one of my most important aspects.
>>3991030It's faster but probably not worth the upgrade just for the AF. I would go with X-T2, safe some money and later buy the X-T5 when it comes with that new sensor.
>>3991018you misunderstood the crap out of my post
>>3991230cope
Previous: >>3982586Posting in /fgt/ doesn't make you gay unless you only shoot at the native aperture. bad chems, bad scan, good times >Community Links: 35mmc.com Casualphotophile.com Emulsive.org istillshootfilm.org/beginners-guide-film-photography digitaltruth.com/devchart.php industrieplus.net/dxdatabase[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-E3Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 11.0.1 (Windows)Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)60 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2022:01:18 01:31:30Exposure Time1/600 secF-Numberf/1.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/1.0Brightness3.4 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceDaylightFlashNo FlashFocal Length40.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>3991089It’s pretty irrelevant and I say this as a RZ shooter. The 67ii has an improved shutter if you’re really worried about it.
>>3991121You can buy an X700 and a flash and bag for it for the same price as the Canon that comes with it already. The difference is you have a bunch of lenses for one system already, and if you buy the Canon, you'll only have one until you buy more.
>>3991133true. i did omit (on purpose) that i do already have a minolta flash (auto 220x) and an auto winder g. and a half decent carrying case that can fit the camera with the 50 and the 28 and a few filters.i guess i just wanted to hear that the canon is not better enough in photo quality to prefer it over something i'm geared for already. i'll get myself the x700 body.is the myth that earlier x700s (lower serial number) are less prone to capacitor problems true or should i just buy any that looks good?
>>3991041Did I stutter? 100%
>>39909191l solution and 1 roll? Its fine. 0.5 l, 0.25? No.
I was sorting through my old pictures and selected a few I want to store away to track my progress and reminisce. I didn't really understand photography back then so technically they aren't great.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 4000DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2022:01:20 15:46:07Exposure Time1/50 secF-Numberf/16.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/16.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length18.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 4000DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2022:01:22 19:47:25Exposure Time1/160 secF-Numberf/11.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/11.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length18.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 4000DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2022:01:22 18:57:29Exposure Time1/160 secF-Numberf/11.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/11.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length18.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 4000DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2022:01:22 18:43:14Exposure Time1/160 secF-Numberf/11.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/11.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length18.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 4000DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2022:01:22 18:34:49Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/10.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/10.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length18.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
those are beautiful anon. good jobi really enjoyed themalso argentinia looks amazing, and so damn clean! was it as nice as it looks like on those pics?
Recent photo thread
>>3991159Weird one to work with. With a lens that wide I'd go find the biggest building I could and try a few there. You need either a very big subject or a scene which is really busy. It's hard now with all this corona bollocks but a very crowded place with a lot going on would work well with the lens. Like this level of crowds.You can capture so much with it you have to fill the shot up with your subject rather than expecting the viewer to see what you wanted them to.
>>3991168Well that's a nice amount of detail, can practically see the individual atoms of the statue.
>>3991189gonna be hard to find such. maybe inside a forest could do the job of filling the frame up too. thanks. i think having something small infront but in the back something very big/ long could do it too. just not sure yet how to handle the focus-problem
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiColor Space InformationsRGB
>>3991226crop the car out
i took some photos on my local hill[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 1000DCamera SoftwareRawTherapee 5.8Image-Specific Properties:Image Width3898Image Height2594Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2021:12:29 15:10:48Exposure Time1/40 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/5.7Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePartialFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length55.00 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>3990158nice
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS MCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2022:01:20 19:08:41Exposure Time1/400 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
>>3990331damn, this one hit different.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 5DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2021:09:10 10:11:33Exposure Time1/80 secF-Numberf/2.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/2.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>3990331>tree grew into trashcrazy
