Self-serve ads are available again! Check out our new advertising page here.
Go /p/ro: • Please post images that are JPG format and ideally smaller than 1 MB, and/or about 1000 pixels on the longest side. • Expect to be judged harshly. Learn to deal with it. Want: • We come here for photos, so post yours as often as possible, even if "image unrelated" to your text. • "Flickr/500px/Tumblr/Facebook/Portfolio" threads are for critique and networking. • Use "Recent Photos" threads if you are shy or only want to post a couple of photos. • Shared raw files which we can collectively edit for discussion of post-processing techniques, are encouraged. • Use the Catalog to consolidate similar topics (photographic themes, images or technical gear threads). Do not want: • Go to /wsr/ or /r/ for specific Photoshop requests. • Gear threads are discouraged, but identified as necessary. Many users simply hide these threads. Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
I’m helping hosting a photography competition for a class and I want to buy a photography book for the winner as I imagine they’ll be some what interested in the subject I want to buy a book like “most influential photographs of all time” to keep their attention whilst also letting them learn something. I’m just worried if the book will contain photographs not suitable for a child like nguyen’s execution or some shit. Know any safe non political / non gruesome photography books I could buy with the same topic?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width220Image Height168Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>3868542>Know any safe non political / non gruesome photography books I could buy with the same topic?the park by kohei yoshiuiki
>>3868543>the park by kohei yoshiuikiwe have found a real comedian
>>3868549buy it faggot
Other one capped, Previous thread: >>3858564[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7M2Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)32 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:04:15 04:27:50Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating1250Lens Aperturef/2.8Brightness-1.1 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length32.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessHard
>>3868310
>google photos' editor>highlight at -100>shadows at 100>contrast at 100>pop at 40>adjust to tasteInstant higher dynamic range and more vivid tones. thank me later.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera ModelSM-G610MCamera SoftwareGoogleEquipment MakesamsungFocal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mmMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.9Image-Specific Properties:Image Width2448Image Height3264Image Created2021:04:21 12:43:36Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiISO Speed Rating800Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramUnique Image IDW13LSJA00AM W13LSKH01SA_F-Numberf/1.9Exposure Time1/40 secFocal Length3.60 mmFlashNo FlashMetering ModeSpotScene Capture TypeStandardExposure Bias1/2 EVImage Height2448White BalanceAutoBrightness-1.2 EVImage Width3264Exposure ModeAutoLens Aperturef/1.9Color Space InformationsRGB
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2296Image Height2020Scene Capture TypeStandard
What are the best lightroom alternatives? Preferably no subscriptions or anything like that.
I literally just use my iPad photo app, although for anything more serious you can pirate Lightroom.
Capture One
>>3868448Lightroom. Stop being a cheap Jew.
>>3868448Capture One is the only real answer so far
if it's money, pirate Lightroom Classic CCSome people like Capture One but I can't get used to it. Costs like $300 without sub and more if you're a Canonfag.Darktable and Raw Therapee were the best free alternatives I've used, I had a slight preference for Darktable.
Do you ever have issues with the film feed after chucking a roll into the camera? Sometimes I get angry and start yelling fuck when the film lever makes the cylinder turn but the film snaps out.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.Camera ModelSTYLUS1,1sCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Elements 12 Editor 12.0 MacintoshPhotographerKotivaloMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)100 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width3968Image Height2648Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Pixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2017:09:14 21:55:26Exposure Time1/6 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/2.8Exposure Bias1 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length21.20 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3968Image Height2648RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
lmao caveman
We've all shot that one blank roll. Now I always make sure the rewind knob spins when I advance.
Your hard drive will fail you, cloud storage is unreliable, same goes with internetIf you're shooting on digital, you should absolutely print your photos
>>3868515No. No I don't think I will. We have data redundancy for a reason.
>>3868532>data redundancyWe will see how that goes in 20 years and more
>>3868515>Your hard drive will fail you, cloud storage is unreliable, same goes with internetcan't relate
EOS M6II for 899 EUR? M system seems pretty well fledged out by now, offering dual pixel, a few nice primes from Canon and Sigma, and the best APS-C sensor currently on the market. Even if it was a dead end, I dont think I would miss any lens. WBU?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 80DMaximum Lens Aperturef/4.0Image-Specific Properties:Exposure Time1/160 secF-Numberf/9.0ISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/9.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo FlashFocal Length105.00 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManual
>>3868173Manual is better for video
>>3867990Fuck off with your dead end system and get a Fuji
>>3868499How is Fuji not a dead end? EF-M offers an upgrade path to full frame.
>>3868513Wut how
>>3868534Those canon m people all have to buy ff glass if they don't like the three native lenses
any advice how to get into documentary filmmaking? Money & gear isn't really an issue for me and i have plans for some interesting projects. But how do i start? I mean how do i approach people and ask them "Hey, i want to make a documentary about you and your group" without being rejected for being a noob without any prior experience?
>>3865662>>3865662>Get some experience working with other documentary film makers first.same thing, they don't work with noob outsiders. I think i'll focus on solo short films with narration for now and maybe submit some to Field Of Vision, they seem to accept cold submissions if they're good enough.
>>3865659another one[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width110Image Height110Scene Capture TypeStandard
Just fucking do it you pussy wussy and don't ask a bunch of retards on a Semalese origami folding club about it
>>3865639Get a canon camcorder with dual pixel autofocus and a good shotgun/omnidirectional microphone to attach to it
>>3867946>muh [obscure country] [obscure activity] forum[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width173Image Height320
The pandemic is ending any second now... edition All video related questions and discussion is intended for this thread. Here we discuss techniques, gear and anything else related to capturing video footage. Please don't pretend to be an expert if you don't know what you're talking about. Kindly leave your ego at the door. Posting short films/scripts or other work you've done is encouraged. We tend to use and recommend DSLRs/mirrorless cameras because they provide phenomenal picture quality for their price, have large sensors (ie the same size used in high-end cinema cameras and higher) and have interchangeable lenses. In contrast, consumer camcorders normally have much smaller sensors and a fixed lens. >STICKY - https://pastebin.com/35u6DcnF >Helpful guide, additional books and more in-depth FAQs - https://web.archive.org/web/20200926115310/https://pastebin.com/kG0gRmTZ >NO ONE CARES WHAT AN EXPERT YOU THINK YOU ARE. IF YOU’RE ASKING BASIC-AS-SHIT QUESTIONS, YOU CAN’T BE ALL THAT GREAT. SEE ABOVE Previous thread >>3836187 Quick FAQS >what’s the best camera available on a “budget”?Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>3867430>Sony has it, but nobody uses Sony and their nocolor science.What are you, from 2012? The Venice does have a rolling shutter. Current Sony color science is respectable, and plenty of movies and TV shows use it, not just Sony-produced ones.
>>3867823> smoking weed all of the timeWeed is a psychedelic, and is used by many creative people. You only need shrooms or acid if you have a major case of writers block. Weed just helps you relax like drinking but using a ton of weed is much safer than drinking a ton of alcohol (which is something a lot of writers like to do. cf. Hemingway)
>>3867991> Weed just helps you relax like drinking but using a ton of weed is much safer than drinking a ton of alcohol (which is something a lot of writers like to do. cf. Hemingway)Well, they're both bad. But weed with fry your brain, while alcohol will only fry your body. Sticking to water and waiting for druggies to fall over is fool proof plan.> Current Sony color science is respectable, and plenty of movies and TV shows use it, not just Sony-produced ones.lol, no
Hello, newfag here Looking for a small portable camera to film travels and make small cinematic videos for myself just to edit and capture memories, with a gimble. Nothing too professional. Read the sticky and it says>get the m50Was wondering anyone tried the sony zv1? I know its basically for youtube vloggers and such, however I like the small form factor and you just point and shoot. However some drawbacks like micro-usb and the shitty battery life doesn't let me to pull the trigger. Was thinking to wait a couple months and see what Sony does with the Mark 2 of this camera. Since they're rumors they will use some kind high-end tech from the A1.Also I could get a G7X Mark III barely used from a friend but when I checked the reviews I like the Sony video quality much better.I don't intend to spend more then 1k since I'm not a professional nor I intend to be. Any tips ?
>>3868525You should get an interchangeable lens camera. Being able easily upgrade your lenses if you want a fast prime or something is pretty nice. Also a larger sensor will give you a better image and more ability to control depth of field.You can get a good deal on a used one.
Film Community Links:35mmc.comCasualphotophile.comEmulsive.orgistillshootfilm.org/beginners-guide-film-photographydigitaltruth.com/devchart.phpindustrieplus.net/dxdatabaseOld thread >>3864545
>>3868516it isn't a humble brag, I'm going back to retake some photos. i nitpick my own shit a lot
What labs do you use to develop? I use TheDarkroom and Memphis Film Lab.
>>3868521I just walk down to Picturehouse in Chelsea and have my shit developed there or go to Luster Photo in the lower east side. Never got the appeal of mailing shit when I can have my shit developed the day it was shot + what if temperatures range a lot during shipping.
>>3868517What film?
>>3868522That’s because you live in NY and have access to plenty of good labs in person. Check out Bleeker Digital if you like Luster.
I got into photography recently (used to take pictures on my phone) so I'm still learning about technical stuff, especially lenses.I currently own an Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II with a Panasonic G 20mm f/1.7 II Pancake lens for street photography, and it's pretty good.I'm looking for more recommendations on good lenses to diversify my experience, what else would you recommend, especially for autoportrait ? Should I go for a 50mm lens or more ?
>>3867612>Sigma 56mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary>Olympus 17mm f/1.8>Olympus 45mm f/1.8>Olympus 60mm f/2.8 MacroAny other recommendations will likely be outside your budget if the likes of constant aperture zooms are out of your budget.You may also consider the Panasonic Lumix 35-100mm f/2.8 X, or the Kowa Prominar 8mm f/2.8.
>>3867627I consider the 12-40 f2.8 to be excellent at the wider focal lengths but to be just good or decent from 25 to 40mm. For anyone who is looking at it it also has an extremely short minimum focus distance, so you can do almost-macro stuff.
>>3867612Pls stop me from buying the 20mm f1.7I already have the 14mm 2.5 and 25mm 1.7
>>3868446Do it it's a good lens don't listen to the haters saying it focuses slow and it's noisy. (Not saying it isn't those things but it's a great lens nonetheless)
I've been using the Panasonic PZ 14-42mm compact zoom since I'm only interested in the smallest kit possible.Works great with the GM5 and GX1 and other pocket cameras.I far I find it more versatile and convenient than the 12-32mm, even though that lens is considerably smaller.
Just got LrC after having used LR 5.6 for quite some time. I've noticed the images appear to be sharpened quite extensively within LrC before any edits are applied. Has anyone experienced this before? In the example provided, left image is the original, and the right image is from within LrC. Whether opening the original file in Windows, or Chrome, the experience is the same. Any input appreciated.
>>3868097LR automatically puts sharpening at 40 when you import
>>3868211I double and tripled checked the sharpening slider and it's set to 0. Texture and clarity are also at 0. Upon exporting, the image appears the same as the original jpeg. This means that Lightroom is displaying a picture that is sharpened, however that does not reflect the final export. I'm rather perplexed by this.
>>3868373Have you checked if you have sharpening on export on?
>>3868097Funny you posted it here since I've made this 'mistake' yesterdaywhen importing your images on Lr make sure to have your settings as the pic attached. Lr has it's own sharpening when you import it
Talk me out of it....https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1493858-REG/sigma_fp_mirrorless_digital_camera.html/
>>3868401"i pick cameras based on looks"3d print a statuette of ur favourite camera and hand it around ur neck with gold chains.
>>3868401>t. never saw a super8
>>3868396exactly. hell, I'd be happy even if they just updated the DP Merrill line.
>>3865898Lmao
>>3868396It's not meant as a primarily stills camera anon
Especially for nature photos. I have large budget.
what effect would you use to get the greenish hue? I am a noob at editing[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelDSC-HX80Camera SoftwareDSC-HX80 v1.00Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.0Focal Length (35mm Equiv)36 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2021:04:19 04:13:53Exposure Time1/40 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating80Brightness5.5 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, AutoFocal Length6.17 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4896Image Height3672RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>38657561. Get a really shitty camera2. Go take pictures of bums sleeping in disgusting waterways.
>>3866320lol do you study near that street ?
>>3868140[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>3868487Nope, I live in the 15th district.>>3868491Almost.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7RM3Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.5Focal Length (35mm Equiv)35 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:04:21 21:43:26Exposure Time1/80 secExposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating50Brightness0.9 EVExposure Bias-1.7 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length35.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastHardSaturationNormalSharpnessHard
Just got one of these for $25, what lenses will fit?
>>3866194Oh that's awesome to hear. I'll never understand hipsters and their weird fixations.
>>3868417
>>3868455Because A Mount was a quick flash in the pan that never gained real traction. Other than the 135STF and the weird autofocus catadioptric lens they made, there aren’t any A Mount lenses that it’s really worth adapting to other mounts, and do not enough people would buy an adapter to justify the R&D cost.
>>3868505Fair
>>3868424It's not a argument or a trend. Plenty other sites have user names, yet these two decide to come here and alter board culture. You are defending a cancer that has destroyed the internet by concentrating solely on the person and not the photograph, statement, creation, etc. Art is not a man, neither is a photograph. Also you are a newfag if you think >a thread died for thisis a trend and lately. Lurk 2 years.>>3868504Lacks brevity
