>>3536100
That's baseless guessing Anon.

If you know Sony you would know they love to recycle their sensors for another generation.
A7S -> A7Sii
A7Rii -> A7Riii
A7 -> A7ii

>>3534580
I got a plustek8100 and I got a Nikon coolscan8000. The plustek actually does a hell of a job for being 1/5 the price. Problem is on really dense negs I get vertical lines running all through the scans on the plustek through vuescan. Also the inability to focus its lens really hamstrings sharpness.

File: em1x_telo_1.jpg (820 KB, 1600x1144)

820 KB JPG

What up lads, so of course I use an Olympus and never cared about the rest.

However my mums friend got into photography. She's using a shitter canon whatever.
As the local bad boy /p/ro I was quickly asked which mirrorlet should she upgrade to.
>She needs a full frame
>She does product and landscape
>Her existing canon lenses can be adaptes to preferably with af
>Somewhat simple to use

I was thinking fuji or onions. Maybe because the all the memes here.
Price isnt really an issue but lets keep it kinda cheap, idk, under 1000 used.
Which cam would you recommend?

Pic unrelated but is the best camera ever created by man.


Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>3536164
Fujifilm X-H1

>>3536164
>Onions
Kek. Word swaps s.o.y to onion...

>>3534399
Let him do whatever he wants, no matter what. As long as nobody gets hurt and assholes get offended.

>>3534399
There's nothing wrong with this

>>3535302
So you're for Walmart selling AR-15s to people who don't intend to use them to harm people?

>>3534416
>>3535302
>>3535320
you have to go back

>>3535329
are you not?

Get a cook looking camera and set to auto. Get her to do poses and get riskier from there till you end up with your entire 2 inches inside her. Good luck

>>3536087
>go to town.
this is why you are still a virgin

>>3536083
The one you have with you

The lengths that desperate numales will go through for a thot... ridiculous. Men really went off the cliff in the mid 90s.

OP, just take the next step and go full (((Tinder))).

File: BDC7EB83-AF57-49FA-BABE-8(...).jpg (50 KB, 500x333)

50 KB JPG

>>3536083
Do you have a camera? If not, go full Terry Richardson core. Get a bunch of disposable film cameras, or a cheap film camera with auto settings and flash, and be extremely sexually provocative with the models. There’s a thread on T-bone here somewhere, check it out, I think his style is a good place for a total amateur seeking to maximize their “cool artsy photographer” vibe.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3X
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Macintosh
Photographer	Terry Richardson
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1536
Image Height	1024
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	150 dpi
Vertical Resolution	150 dpi
Image Created	2013:08:13 18:04:32
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	2.37 m
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Flash
Flash	Flash, Compulsory, Return Detected
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1536
Image Height	1024
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3535793
I normally scan at 3600DPI since that is the fastest on my scanner. I resize to something smaller since that is all I need normally.

>>3535889
I'd say it is a tiny bit more fiddly and requires a little more care than with a bayonet mount. You don't want to cross thread and ruin your lens and body.

>>3534574
My favorite camera. Its heavy as fuck but its built like a tank.

Bought it for $100 and it came with the 55mm f1.8, 200mm f4 and the 24mm f3.5. I had an old spotty that I gave away after I got it. Its a nice camera

I'm a dumbass and posted in the old thread, repostin here

Been shooting film for a while now, been loving it. Starting to get in the habit of just cutting out- and throwing away the worthless negatives I take (mostly stuff that's out of focus or with bad composition, etc).

Is that wise to do or will I regret that? I don't need these taking up space in my negative sleeves I think? Do you guys keep your negatives at all after scanning?

>>3536039
How do I know what DPI my negs were scanned at? What does 3600DPI equal in resolution?

>>3525572
>you'll get blown highlights and/or crushed shadows on high contrast shots.
>H
get fucked retard

just scan 3 times and merge
actually fucking retarded lmao

>>3532614
No they're shit and that's why they're dirt cheap. Buy used or wait for deals on an Epson V/Plustek scanner. If you want things printed it's normally cheaper to outsource the work unless you're printing shit constantly. Make friends with your local printing company and maybe you'll get a nice discount.

>>3525444
My Epson V600 does a decent job with 35mm negs and slides. It's not super fast but it makes decent images.

File: E7C12AC7-B032-47B9-B9F8-9(...).jpg (481 KB, 750x602)

481 KB JPG

Autism in here is v strong just take photos and find a scan solution that gives you the resolution you need for your output. The great thing about film is you can always rescan at higher res when needed.

Fucking thread asking if scanners are a worthwhile investment and it dissolves into talk g drum scanners and stitching a billion dslr photos together.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	144 dpi
Vertical Resolution	144 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	750
Image Height	602

Amatuer/hoobyist here, got a Plustek 8100 and while the price was kinda hard to swallow, the quality is really great and it's freeing knowing I can just scan at home. The prescan is a godsend too so I can just see if a negative is trash before I dedicate the 2 minute scanning time.

Because my local photo lab develops for $3 per roll and requires you to buy 25 cent prints of each photo you want scanned + a $5 scanning fee (for jpg on a CD!!), I save about 15 dollars on each roll now, it rules.

And because I often make photo zines and sell them on gumroad, it pays for itself in no time. Now I just develop for $3, maybe I'll look into developing at home in the future.

File: DSC_1627.jpg (1.59 MB, 6016x4016)

1.59 MB JPG

>>3534929

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D750
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.3 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	844
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2019:09:14 22:35:35
Exposure Time	1/320 sec
F-Number	f/9.0
Exposure Program	Not Defined
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/9.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: DSC_1632.jpg (1.59 MB, 5274x3521)

1.59 MB JPG

>>3534929

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D750
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.3 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	844
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2019:09:14 22:36:34
Exposure Time	1/400 sec
F-Number	f/10.0
Exposure Program	Not Defined
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/10.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: DSC_1642.jpg (1.48 MB, 6016x4016)

1.48 MB JPG

>>3534929

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D750
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.3 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	844
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2019:09:14 22:35:51
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Not Defined
ISO Speed Rating	220
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: DSC_1676.jpg (1.56 MB, 4016x6016)

1.56 MB JPG

>>3534929

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D750
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.3 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	844
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2019:09:14 22:36:00
Exposure Time	1/400 sec
F-Number	f/10.0
Exposure Program	Not Defined
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/10.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: age.jpg (169 KB, 640x480)

169 KB JPG

>>3535953
>His idea of patriotism is build upon exalting the memory of a terrorist event and military response

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	1 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	640
Image Height	480

>>3535867
Forgot it was shot in 3d. It's two cam rig. One cam vertical, and the other at 90° to it. Both filming through beamsplitter.

>>3535901
>Both filming through beamsplitter
god damn!

do you have any idea how many films today are shot in 3D?

>>3535728
just wondering how much $ would a set of gear shown in the pic would be?

>>3535728
Potato jet does a video on what Oscar nominees are shot on. mostly Alexa/ Alexa mini and a smattering of reds. Sony a7s models used as beater/throwaway cameras for some shots.

>>3535814
Shiet they stole OPs camera

>>3536022
I'd imagine a contax 645

>>3536000
Most people think there is a fine line between phones and big black slrs. So when it looks more camera than phone they'll think "lol not professional enuf" and walk away.
.
Besides I wouldn't want to fit that homunculus in my skinny jeans.

File: 71M-umNP1jL._SX569_.jpg (46 KB, 569x569)

46 KB JPG

>>3536000
They already tried with the Nokia PureView, nobody wanted one. People will choose a thinner camera with a small sensor over a thicc camera with a big sensor so the market goes that direction. Hence putting loads of camera lenses on like they are now.

Most people aren't into photography in a serious way so the second you try to market prime lens or 1" sensor people switch off. It's an uphill battle.

>>3536044
>Most people aren't into photography
I think with attention whoring on social media more people are learning, or at least wanting better pictures from their phones. You may be able to market something simple to understand to zoomers like larger sensors, like the *x zoom was to boomers.

>>3535673
Full frame digital Nikon S rangefinder with hybrid viewfinder like xpro series. Adapt to F mount will full support for ais and Leica M with rangefinder coupling.

>>3535918
fuck this bate thread, does anybody have any idea of how one goes about to oil this lens, my one is pretty old and is a bitch to focus its too sticky

>>3535918
Because the distance from sensor to mount is just under 50mm on slr's and symmetrical lenses are the easiest to make requiring the least glass.

>>3535918
I've seen fx tamron 300mm zooms much cheaper than that 50mm afd lens

Nikon 50 1.8g objectively the best deal in photography. Aspherical element, sharp edge to edge. Under 200 AUD used.

i enjoy that nobody took op's stupid bait. who the fuck cares if some fucking apple press conference called a 50mm lens tele?

File: men-s-black-t-shirt-500x500.jpg (17 KB, 500x500)

17 KB JPG

Most of the photographers I know will dress like this when they are working.

>>3535883
just use a phone and blend in

File: King.jpg (274 KB, 680x907)

274 KB JPG

>>3535958
>>3535997
Real talk, Joe is the most pretentious street photographer on Instagram.

Why are they all like this.

>>3536128
Why is the photographer in the photo.

>>3536129
That's how pretentious he is.

>>3536050
I did some strobe shots in a setup that looks decent on my Pentax body with wb set to flash on the Sony and got the same eerie colors. Whites look pretty white. And no I'm not just complaining of lack of saturation I'm comparing raw to raw.

>>3536047
Sony have proven themselves repeatedly to have the best color science, both subjectively and objectively.

>>3536047

They did, it's called the a9/a7iii/a7Riii

>>3536058
Sorry, I thought this was a jpeg shooter tier question. In theory you can profile the raws to be identical but I’d be surprised if any of the preset wb settings matched another manufacturers, so wouldn’t use them as a reference point.

Now I think about it this is probably a CFA integration issue, they just couldn’t work out how to tune their sensor to fuji’s filter.

>>3536070
Only since the a7iii, and the a7s was pretty good as well. Probably because it had a very different CFA to all the other models at the time.

Full disclosure, I own an a7s.

File: Boi.jpg (90 KB, 1242x1242)

90 KB JPG

>>3536070

>>3535839
I'd say the same except the opposite. Shit photographers crank up the saturation and vibrance slider to make boring snapshits of their garden look interesting.

File: dunning-kruger_effect.jpg (35 KB, 1300x728)

35 KB JPG

>>3535939
>some people insist
You know your mother will tell you anything to keep you happy right? Kek

The only real test of your work is if you get paid for it. Once people will part with money for a print of your photography or go out of their way to hire you to document something for them, you know you have actual talent. Otherwise you're probably in the early overconfidence part of the Dunning-Kruger effect like a lot of /p/ is.

File: Diamonds!.gif (496 KB, 245x200)

496 KB GIF

>>3536016
>monochrome converted d850
>To convert a camera to true monochrome, the CFA (color filter array) is physically removed with an acid or solvent. This leaves the sensor so that all pixels record all wavelengths of light without the red or green or blue filtration of the CFA.

>>3535981
no it isn't

File: 00955266840ff6c3172a6031a(...).jpg (72 KB, 563x690)

72 KB JPG

>>3535839
>Camera gear doesn't matter: muh the one you have on you meme is retarded
>The only reason for using film 2019 is to be "different" and a hipster. It's shit.
>Street photography is for autists
>@misshattan is a shit tier photographer who only got where she is cause of her cunt

>>3536075
>>3536080
>>3536085

Samefagging mongoloid retard.

File: 78E4FD87-F151-49A4-9807-5(...).png (304 KB, 2048x1536)

304 KB PNG

>>3536107
You need to get more creative with the insults kiddo

>>3536108

Wow, an autistic Chinese kid learned how to press F11. Impressive...

You guys still giving attention to this mft faggot?

>>3532944
Idk man you're the one who wrote an essay. In that time you could've been shooting.