[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
06/20/16New 4chan Banner Contest with a chance to win a 4chan Pass! See the contest page for details.
[Hide] [Show All]


[Catalog] [Archive]

File: 1187770908945.jpg (61 KB, 1000x508)
61 KB
61 KB JPG
Go /p/ro:
• Please post images that are JPG format, smaller than 1 MB, and/or about 1000 pixels on the longest side.
• Expect to be judged harshly. Learn to deal with it.

Want:
• We come here for photos, so post yours as often as possible, even if "image unrelated" to your text.
• "Flickr/500px/Tumblr/Facebook/Portfolio" threads are for critique and networking
• Use "Recent Photos" threads if you are shy or only want to post a couple of photos.
• Shared raw files which we can collectively edit for discussion of post-processing techniques, are encouraged.
• Use the catalog to consolidate similar topics (photographic themes, images or technical gear threads)

Do Not Want:
• Go to >>>/r/ for specific Photoshop requests.
• Gear threads are discouraged, but identified as necessary. Many users simply hide these threads.


Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

164 replies and 25 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3603215
Normally it defaults to continuous autofocus in video mode. Manual focus is typically best on video anyway, if you can get your head around it you get way more out of video work manually focusing rather than hoping the camera reads your mind for you.
>>
>>3603206
I will probably get it, but the Tamron is lighter by 300g
>>
>>3603217

For stuff I've set up, I can do manual, but when I'm taking video of my nephew running around I have to track and rely. Just weird how it'll back focus and won't find him until I hold the shutter down
>>
Is low light performance enough of a reason to upgrade to an a7ii/a7iii? Like, can I get a 2.8 zoom lens for FF and it will perform as good in lowlight as 1.4/1.8 primes on my apsc?
>>
>>3603223

a7ii is decent in lowlight, but the a7iii is like a mini a7Sii for low light. 2.8 on FF is about the same as a 1.4 prime is on APS-C, but you'll have higher flexibility when it comes to ISO numbers.

File: IMG_20200117_124821.jpg (63 KB, 640x640)
63 KB
63 KB JPG
guys, honest opinion, does this look shopped to you or there's just something very wrong with perspective?

I mean the body, especially the legs, looks weird as fuck, but why would you shop them like that, it just looks deformed, so maybe it's just a weird shot
1 reply omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3602360
It looks extremely homosexual not photoshopped.
>>
>>3602360
It's just teh tilt and gay.
>>
>>3602360
>>>/fit/
Weird shorts
Skip leg day erryday
Weird stance and pose
Odd lighting... so just overall weird
>>
>>3602658
>skip leg day erryday
Dude, he skipped everything every day.
>>
File: qqq.jpg (116 KB, 640x640)
116 KB
116 KB JPG
Still gay.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.14
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2020:01:19 15:21:49
Color Space InformationsRGB

File: 1346925623_IMG_270429.jpg (60 KB, 1000x1000)
60 KB
60 KB JPG
plustek edition

old thread: >>3598177
All analog/film photography related questions and general discussion is to take place in this thread.
35mm, 120, medium format, large format, instant, polaroid, instax, C41, E6, B&W, developing, scanning, labs, darkroom etc.
Post photos as often as possible, we want to see that beautiful grainy goodness!

useful links:
http://istillshootfilm.org/beginners-guide-film-photography
https://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.php
http://industrieplus.net/dxdatabase

>posting in /fgt/ doesn't make you gay, unless you're still getting the lab to scan your images
79 replies and 11 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
Do you even print? If you print, what's the largest size you ever printed at?

>>3603130
I gave you a print size, but the 300dpi are still enough to print at 8x12.

>>3603136
1080p for IG is more than enough. You forget about viewing distance. Nobody notices it only 300dpi unless they stick their nose to it.
I don't care about your nitpicking on PPI vs. DPI. There is a reason scientific journals demand 300dpi for photos.
Color casts can be corrected in software before making the final scan. Still, the time it takes to scan the next frame can be used to correct anything in PS.
>>
>>3603199
>I gave you a print size, but the 300dpi are still enough to print at 8x12.
Anon, 300dpi is enough to print 24x36mm.
I think you're confused how the settings work. If you go by print size, and put 300dpi, it means as you adjust the print size, the scanner will adjust the scanning dpi automatically to give you 300dpi at the selected print size.

>If you print, what's the largest size you ever printed at?
8x10" for most random shots, I find it the most practical (4x5" too small). Occasionally higher, up to 20x24". Above that it gets really expensive and impractical, you need huge drums/trays to develop, and an enlarger with a rail as tall as yourself.
>>
>>3602728
Guys, I found a BeLOMO Vilia Auto for sale in this shop near me. Should I buy it for 2 USD?
>>
Hi. Just wanted to have a helping opinion.
I found a canon f1 for sale. It would be great to replace my ae-1 that has (i think) some problems with its lightmeter. The f1 is at 200$.
But i also want to buy a mamiya c2 with 3 lenses, a light meter and filters. That is at 325$.
So in your opinion what should i do?
>>
>>3603220
Figure out what's wrong with your AE-1 and stop buying shit you don't need

File: gear.png (79 KB, 239x237)
79 KB
79 KB PNG
Previous thread: >>3597650

>All discussion and questions related to gear should take place in this exact thread.
>Redirection and answering questions in this thread is encouraged.
143 replies and 11 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3603179
why fotodiox? i hate collectors that dont use shit. like nigga take photos
>>
I first time shot at an smaller event for a friend yesterday but I only had the xpro1
I used the 35mm 1.4, worked surprsingly well, but I sometimes needed zoom or wider shots and my kit lens couldn't do it

If I wanted to upgrade for more low light performance, do newer Fuji cameras have that or would I have to get a fullframe camera?
>>
is the new E-mount sigma 24-70mm better than the tamron 28-75mm? The tamron is $300 cheaper for me here.
>>
>>3603180
not him but fotodiox stuff is tough and cheap as hell
>>
>>3603216
vs kf?

File: 1536006013565.png (89 KB, 1050x600)
89 KB
89 KB PNG
Anyone interested in a Glasgow meetup?

We had one before but only two of us showed up, maybe we'll have more luck if we try again?
https://archive.nyafuu.org/p/thread/3350906/#q3353833
21 replies and 3 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: 3Jss11Q.jpg (211 KB, 1023x811)
211 KB
211 KB JPG
>>3602828
Maybe, but pretty much all meetups bring only the sociably deficient aspies from their caves don't they?

All I can see a /p/ meetup being is just gearboasting nonsense. What are a bunch of guys holding cameras in glasgow going to do that's not fucking gay anyway?
>>
>>3603083
>what are a bunch of guys holding cameras in Glasgow going to do that's not fucking gay anyway?
I dunno, take photos with them? I know that's a foreign concept to the Sonynggers on this board.
>>
>>3602828
Call me when it's an East Bloc meetup, more interesting sights and way cheaper. I'm not going to pay for bong accommodation.
>>
>>3603188
>I dunno, take photos with them?

aka
>take photo's of other people holding cameras
&
>everyone snapshitting the same mildly interesting thing passing by
>>
>>3603210
Jesus, you're bitter. You go on a photo walk, like you would on your own, but with someone else with you. And you can stop for a pint of beer or a meal at any point with some good conversation.

I don't know why snapshitting mildly interesting things passing by is somehow more pathetic to you when done in a group. Most photography "clubs" or meets incorporate some kind of photo walk because it's a good chance to stretch your photography muscles and compare the shots you got compared to the guy next to you. You're actively doing the thing you're interested in but with other people.

Can't believe I have to explain this to you, Jesus.

File: IMG_5715.jpg (395 KB, 693x1500)
395 KB
395 KB JPG
New IG thread - post your Instagram profiles so you can stroke your ego even more
Rate others, provide critique, and follow if you see anything you like

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2019 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2019:12:10 00:28:15
CommentScreenshot
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width693
Image Height1500
131 replies and 67 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3602323
Fair enough. I'll go real quick since I've posted mine two times.

>>3601913
Absolutely adore the storefront pictures and the colours on the subway entrance right there! I'd enjoy it even more if the pictures were grouped by occasion/theme. Nonetheless very nice pictures!
>>3602311
Not quite enough to get specific here. So far I like the train-stop. Mainly for its symetrie.
>>3601911
A bit all over the place - especially the film-strip one in the midst of the others. I feel like you have very good subjects/places at your disposal but you're not quite making the most of it. I enjoy the photo in the subway though.
>>3600135
Great photos and a layout that's easy on the eyes. Noice. Love the cat one.
>>3600122
Aesthetic - yes. But the editing is a bit all over the place. Love me some good cute girl wandering around shots so I'll take it!
>>
How can I make my phone pictures look like this?
>>
>>3602351
>A bit all over the place - especially the film-strip one in the midst of the others
You're right. I have a hard time sticking to a consistent layout.

>I enjoy the photo in the subway though.
Thanks!
>>
>>3602481
get a phone with a bad camera
>>
>>3602311
I feel like your images are a bit empty.

That's my problem with film photography on IG. Sometimes I feel like the fact that you have that film looks carries the images over the subject while it should be the other way around for me. I get that you have this mood, but I feel like the mood should emphasize the subject to make the picture.

Film is probably the best way to tell a story or give a certain ambiance that leaves to the imagination. It's lacking a bit here.

11 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
Does this mean anyone posting on instagram etc are professionals since they get paid with Likes?
>>
I make way more than I think I could as a pro photographer.
Through my job I also get to travel to lots of places all over the world and have LOTS of free time.
>>
>>3602015
The only way to make even near my current office worker salary in photography is to shoot weddings and I have no interest in photographing people. I shoot rocks, trees and water, and there is no market for that.
>>
I like my current job better than photography.
>>
>>3602015
I don't want to hate my hobby. It's my refuge for relaxing and just being with myself.

File: a6000.jpg (132 KB, 1000x1000)
132 KB
132 KB JPG
I think my sensor is going out, should I buy another one or upgrade to something else? I'm more than happy with the photos I was getting out of this and have quite a few APS-C lenses.

It looks like the newer Sony crop frame cameras are a lot more expensive and geared more toward bloggers. I have 0 interest in video.
4 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3603055
How is that even relevant when OP already has the lenses he needs?
>>
>>3603062

he can sell them u moron
>>
>>3603066
Why should he? Your argument is that no new lenses will be developed, therefore the camera is shit. But it doesn't affect you if you already have the lenses you need.
>>
>>3602872
Well, there aren't really many features that could be added for stills, but they FINALLY support 1:1 and 4:3 aspect ratios and they seriously improved AF.
If you really want to upgrade the beaten path is to get full frame.
>>
>>3603054
maybe the inside just needs drying time, happened to my A6K when sea water spashed on the hot shoe mount causing a notification error. or check the sensor visually if there is dust or sand inside. or get it checked first before you buy another gear.

File: pretty ginger.jpg (18 KB, 209x280)
18 KB
18 KB JPG
Show me THE most beautiful woman you've ever seen.

Not the hottest, just someone you'd consider an embodiment of gods talented artistry.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareGoogle
Image-Specific Properties:
41 replies and 24 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3600370
>skin cancer
No
>>
>>3601479
nigger lips
>>
>>3600330
I don't have a picture of her, but a girl who works at an escape room I went to.
>>
File: Audrey Hepburn.jpg (46 KB, 556x640)
46 KB
46 KB JPG
>>
File: 1512716021275.jpg (237 KB, 657x1318)
237 KB
237 KB JPG
>>3600445
This but with rape being bad, fiveheads being detested, and fascism being the only correct group ethical position.

File: 1469531210_1159252.jpg (386 KB, 2000x2000)
386 KB
386 KB JPG
I'm looking for a good secondary camera that I can carry around much easier than my DSLR. I've been looking around at compact cameras and I'd really like the Ricoh GR III, but I'm not ready to spend the premium for a camera that I'm not sure about. Does anyone have any thoughts on the GR II? Is it comparable to the GR III, and is it worth the price on the secondary market?
6 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: Ricoh_GRD_3q.jpg (131 KB, 1280x961)
131 KB
131 KB JPG
>>3603057
What you want is the Ricoh Gr Digital (2006) the very first digital Ricoh Gr ever made. You can find one for maybe $100 on eBay. It will fit in your pocket and dust isn't much of an issue. I get some lag rarely when I change the iso (but sticking to P mode and using the spot meter setting to get the right exposure is the easiest way to shoot this camera). It's extremely portable and will fit in any pocket. Startup time is pretty snappy and it has a very primitive snap focus that allows you to press the shutter all the way down in a single motion and will yield a in focus image (if your SS is too low and you're handholding then this will effect it much more) about 9/10 times. (I think it has something to do with the tiny sensor and wide lens). Of course if you like it then you could consider upgrading to the apsc sized versions, but I think you'll find the gr digital to be very capable.
>>
>>3603057
Just get the Mi Note 10 Pro
>>
>>3603184
Shut the fuck up Chinese spy
>>
>>3603061
terrible bait.
>>
>>3603057
if you want something low cost and comparable to the GRIII's sensor, then XF10 is another option, just use snap focus most the time. Currently can even get it for around $360 bnew with fuji intl wrty

Post stupid questions that need no extra thread. Use /gear/ for gear related stupid questions.

Previous is getting buried:
>>3586593
227 replies and 20 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: .jpg (698 KB, 1158x2974)
698 KB
698 KB JPG
>>3602769
>>
File: 1577594908798.jpg (111 KB, 683x650)
111 KB
111 KB JPG
How are these pictures made?
I mean, there's an unnatural color texture to it that makes it look like a painting or something like that.
>>
>>3603160
boomer hdr + clarity slider abuse
>>
>>3595884
Do newer non full frame f mount lenses work on Nikon film cameras (specifically a f3)
>>
>>3603178
Your F3 will not work with G lenses (as well as E and AF-P ones that are newer than G). The F4 works with G lenses.
VR won't work, you need a F5, F100 or F80 for that.

File: P1170002.jpg (143 KB, 1000x714)
143 KB
143 KB JPG
Hi,

I've been trying to be a lot more mindful of composition within my shots.

I was hoping to post a few here so you guys can give me some pointers/tell me what works/what doesn't.

These were all shot on the same day.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
30 replies and 19 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: P1180059.jpg (697 KB, 2048x1536)
697 KB
697 KB JPG
im trying to fuckin' add a white boarder to this shit, but I can't for the life of me work out a good way.

Fuck it - no borders for now.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeOLYMPUS CORPORATION
Camera Modelu30D,S410D,u410D
Camera SoftwareVersion 1.1
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.1
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2020:01:18 17:14:15
Exposure Time1/2 sec
F-Numberf/3.1
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating80
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length5.80 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2048
Image Height1536
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlLow Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Compression SettingUnknown
Macro ModeNormal
>>
File: P1180053.jpg (730 KB, 2048x1536)
730 KB
730 KB JPG
I like the repetition of 2 in this one.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeOLYMPUS CORPORATION
Camera Modelu30D,S410D,u410D
Camera SoftwareVersion 1.1
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.1
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2020:01:18 17:04:00
Exposure Time1/30 sec
F-Numberf/3.1
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating250
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashFlash, Compulsory
Focal Length5.80 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2048
Image Height1536
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlHigh Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Compression SettingUnknown
Macro ModeNormal
>>
File: P1180042.jpg (98 KB, 1000x750)
98 KB
98 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
>>
>>3602534
what the fuck did he mean by this
>>
>>3603027
https://www.artybollocks.com/

File: 81VcA8-kuZL._SL1500_.jpg (980 KB, 1500x1500)
980 KB
980 KB JPG
For some Reason i find it pretty well done.
Is it good, is it bad?
What would you improve about it to make it even better?
6 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3599989
Pretty good
>>
>>3599989
NI-
>>
Album cover photography thread?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1280
Image Height1280
>>
File: Ceephax_UAE.jpg (195 KB, 600x600)
195 KB
195 KB JPG
>>3601741
sure
>>
>>3601741

Virgin Killer remains undefeated

File: IMG_8569.jpg (1.36 MB, 1080x1440)
1.36 MB
1.36 MB JPG
Last thread: https://archive.nyafuu.org/p/thread/3585474/#3585474

I know how to use my camera better and a bit more about post, and I feel like I'm actually taking worse pictures. Or at least, not as good as I want, but if I wait to only post what I really like I won't post anything.
21 replies and 17 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: IMG_8719.jpg (228 KB, 1080x720)
228 KB
228 KB JPG
>>3602176
LAnScApE PhOtOgRaPhY

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 50D
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2019 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2020:01:17 16:52:55
Exposure Time1/160 sec
F-Numberf/4.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/4.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length17.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1080
Image Height720
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
File: IMG_8725.jpg (149 KB, 1080x608)
149 KB
149 KB JPG
>>3602591
flyyy me to the mooon

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 50D
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2019 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2020:01:17 17:25:31
Exposure Time1/100 sec
F-Numberf/4.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/4.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length17.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1080
Image Height608
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>3602624
tfw you post something only to realize you forgot to disable f.lux
>>
File: IMG_8738.jpg (226 KB, 1080x720)
226 KB
226 KB JPG
First attempt at exposure blending in PS. Any/all thoughts appreciated

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 50D
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2019 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2020:01:18 21:18:15
Exposure Time1/500 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length64.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1080
Image Height720
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
File: DSC_0149.jpg (387 KB, 1920x1275)
387 KB
387 KB JPG
taken in the public library

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D5000
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern760
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution150 dpi
Vertical Resolution150 dpi
Image Created2020:01:17 20:34:01
Exposure Time1/640 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating800
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length18.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingCustom
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlLow Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown


Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.