Guys I think I’ve finally lost it, I swore I read this thread and seen these photos before

File: 22F94576-F4B5-4332-B4A6-5(...).jpg (466 KB, 2304x1536)

466 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3300
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	27 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2020:11:18 14:05:58
Exposure Time	1/50 sec
F-Number	f/22.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	800
Exposure Bias	5 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Fine Weather
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	18.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: B8035CB9-C06F-4135-82E9-4(...).jpg (641 KB, 2304x1536)

641 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

File: BECFB7C6-2095-44CD-8D9C-F(...).jpg (676 KB, 2304x1536)

676 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

File: 89FCB15D-0F62-4B3B-BD54-8(...).jpg (26 KB, 478x319)

26 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3300
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	82 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2020:11:18 14:10:49
Exposure Time	1/50 sec
F-Number	f/25.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	800
Exposure Bias	5 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Fine Weather
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Image Width	478
Image Height	319
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3769237
>It subtly shows that you care about presentation, and that you're "presenting" "something" in the first place.

if you're starting a photo thread on /p/ you're already presenting something

>>3769529
Right, I agree. I'm team no-borders.

>>3769553
yes, but people are already doing what you say they're doing with borders

it shouldn't matter if when they use borders that they care about presentation and that they're presenting something in the first place because they already are

borders dont matter

>/p/ ignore photos and talks about technical things
Classic /p/
90% of this board belongs to a "camera things general" on /g/

>>3769250
It has nothing to do with that, it's about pretending it's a page from a photo book, entirely ignoring the fact that photo books use white borders because it serves a double function: save on ink and prevent the borders of the image from getting damaged due to poor storage/handling or cropped due to printer tolerances.
Cargo cult mentality at its finest.
In their minds, their pictures could now be displayed next to Terry Richardson's because they have a white border too.

>>3769642
>Maybe it's all that he has because lenses for Fuji are expensive as fuck even for the simplest lenses
Are you alright you snoytard? The Viltrox speedbooster is just a few dollars short of the cheaper Fuji lenses.

File: 810_4757-colorful-route-6(...).jpg (526 KB, 1000x1498)

526 KB JPG

>>3769642
Another sample from uncle Ken.
>>3769643
>durr boomer
kys faggot, enjoy your garbage cameras.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: basteken.jpg (91 KB, 900x900)

91 KB JPG

>>3769645
>snoytard
You were closer with "Nikon boomer" except I'm not even 30 lmao. Cry more.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Google
Image-Specific Properties:
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: p.jpg (116 KB, 1000x1000)

116 KB JPG

>>3769645
Oh and for the record I haven't owned a Nikon in almost 3 months now.
I switched systems to tap into that M42 goodness.
Pic unrelated.

>>3769213
Just bump the exposure to make it seem more bright and shiny.

>>3769336
No. I did it. I'm glad you like it! It took me a while to get the colors just how I wanted them and then needed to figure out which blending mode would work them best for the outcome I was intending to achieve. I used Photoshop btw. I'm getting pretty good at it if I do say so myself :)

File: 3BA9FB14-D9D3-444D-946A-D(...).jpg (94 KB, 619x495)

94 KB JPG

>>3769274
Too bad an ai does a better job

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	619
Image Height	495
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3769327
That's a peabrain take.

>>3769417
Nah. OP's looks better and is guaranteed to draw more eyes and stoke more conversation.

>>3769418
It really isn't. Ansel has like 4 good pictures, zero great pictures.

File: DDJQQIG (2).jpg (654 KB, 1000x1250)

654 KB JPG

Nothing like a goopy smile.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4132
Image Height	3549
Number of Bits Per Component	16, 16, 16
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	900 dpi
Vertical Resolution	900 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2020:12:01 02:25:11
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1000
Image Height	1250

File: DDJQQIG (1).jpg (652 KB, 1000x1250)

652 KB JPG

She called this her cowboy outfit.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4132
Image Height	3569
Number of Bits Per Component	16, 16, 16
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	900 dpi
Vertical Resolution	900 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2020:12:01 02:23:49
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1000
Image Height	1250

File: KZLS_IYWLE.jpg (769 KB, 1000x1250)

769 KB JPG

I'm holding out hope that the landscape version of this shot will look better. I still have four more to develop. It's really too bad- the colours were fantastic. I wish I had had the guts to waste a Provia 100 Quickload on this, but I don't have great flash-fu yet, and contend with only two mediocre speedlights.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4273
Image Height	3569
Number of Bits Per Component	16, 16, 16
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	900 dpi
Vertical Resolution	900 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2020:12:01 02:50:42
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1000
Image Height	1250

>>3768372
>intimidatingly bizarre girlfriend
How was she this? She has crazy eyes for sure.

File: 52090007.jpg (483 KB, 1040x1024)

483 KB JPG

>>3769651
This was almost 5 years ago, but as I recall, she was a frantic speaker and engaged in some magical thinking (connecting disparate events without reason). Not long after, I remember joking to a mutual friend that it was the first time I'd felt I was in the presence of a woman who would murder me. They both slept on the couch, him at 6'6 and her a full foot shorter, at least. No idea how that was comfortable. Wilder times than now. Haven't seen that friend in years. He had a penchant for wearing mechanic's jumpsuits. Somewhere I've got a really shitty photo of him in one, if you'll excuse the quality, I'll include it with the post. No claim to this being a great shot.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	QSS-31
Camera Software	QSS-31 G002
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1040
Image Height	1024

>>3769506
They are, but Wheeler managed to make Lanier look like the next Steve McCurry with his utter incompetence.
>>3769602
>>3769623
Meh, I think it works. You're just nipticking because you hate the guy for his cringy fedora persona, overblown ego and usual shit taste. In this case he was pretty tasteful. The image looks natural, we see things tinted green when green light reflects on them and people are no exception.

>>3769624
>pink
You mean brown lol.
The entire thing was a shitshow, shooting that 4/10 mystery meat, Wheeler going around with his retarded flash setup, Lanier with his fedora. Pure cringe.

>>3769628
also I forgot to mention Lanier juggling the zoom lens

>>3769623
What are those a lot of things you dont wanna mention? Invisible boogeymen tainting the image?

>>3769628
>mystery meat
my fucking sides

>>3769423
If it's anything like the 35-105 Pentax-A then yes, you can throw out your other lenses.

File: pentax 67ii - velvia 50 - full.jpg (2.46 MB, 1500x1200)

2.46 MB JPG

>>3769423
yeah it's an awesome lens. but no I don't think you'll be selling all your primes since it's slower and heavier. it shines as a landscape lens with a tripod.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	Perfection V800/V850
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 9.2.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2020:11:30 17:21:02
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: pentax 67ii - velvia 50 -(...).jpg (2.1 MB, 1500x1200)

2.1 MB JPG

>>3769482
and here's a closeup at the corner. this is one of the 6x7 lenses that is truly sharp in the corners.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	Perfection V800/V850
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 9.2.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2020:11:30 17:22:51
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: IMG_20201201_003404604.jpg (1.05 MB, 1796x1347)

1.05 MB JPG

I love pentax!

>>3769482
Who cares about weight when shooting medium format lol

File: 2020-12-01--13-51-51.jpg (1.24 MB, 1600x3213)

1.24 MB JPG

>>3768943
FYI: my usual setup is 2Kg, including lens, camera and grip

File: 61cXlRJ-7zL._AC_SS350_.jpg (13 KB, 350x350)

13 KB JPG

>>3769554
I was thinking of some handholding aid like some sort of bracket mounted on the camera's tripod mount to grab both camera and lens from it.
The concerns with the 1kg lens are for the most part about the camera's mount and the adapter for me. I read something about it being a complaint even back in the day where it would warp the bodies of cheaper film SLRs and even make them lose contact with the battery. Pic related was the simplest thing I found and it still seems overly complicated and heavy, lol. If I had access to a machine shop I'd make one from aluminum and be done with it.
The tripod makes sense for the use I have intended for it, video. Will be getting one with a fluid pan/tilt head. Also comes in handy for long exposure shots.
>>3769557
>1390g
Wew lad, I thought those lenses were a bit lighter.

>>3769554
>>3769557
Also thanks for your time.

>>3757797
its the circle game and you lost

>>3769633
Shit dude I forgot I was even playing.
MARBLECAKE ALSO THE GAME

File: Baltazar-0.jpg (135 KB, 720x375)

135 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	720
Image Height	375
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2019:03:24 19:29:30
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	720
Image Height	375

>>3769567
I’m not the tranny poster. Don’t confuse me with a bigot.

>>3769570
>he said, on an anonymous board
every goddamned time.

>>3769249
Then why be an annoying pedant? Language changes, get used to it.

>>3765277
invest in a stylist

How come digital shooters rarely get good skin tones? Are they just unaware?

Is manual focusing with the little pop up OVF focus screen on the Xpro3 comparable to shooting on a rangefinder? I want to adapt my vintage glass and shoot in the city.

>>3768879
Canon has even more overpriced shit.
Nikon just as much.
Who is left?
Leica is overpriced shit too.
So is Panasonic.
Fujifilm is overpriced shit as well.

I guess Pentax is off the hook?

>>3769614
>Canon has even more overpriced shit.
Wrong.
17-40mm f/4 L USM: $599
Sony Vario-Tessar T* FE 16-35mm f/4: $1098

File: 1338190330299.png (91 KB, 200x200)

91 KB PNG

>>3769619
>The butthurt muttlard was the Canontard all along.

>>3769620
What are you even talking about sonytard?

>>3769503
Alt process thread?

File: 201110000039160012.jpg (3.82 MB, 3001x1989)

3.82 MB JPG

i've never received much critique before, go ahead.

>>3769545
b ad

File: DSC_0576.jpg (3.38 MB, 4861x2351)

3.38 MB JPG

Please be gentle

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3300
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 9.2.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.6
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	844
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	51 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2020:11:30 22:35:11
Exposure Time	1/320 sec
F-Number	f/4.5
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/4.5
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Fine Weather
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	34.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3769338
nokia 8.3

>>3769338
All these phones take the same bullshit pictures. Get a phone that doesn't break your balls.

The Xperias have some cool camera stuff, especially for “pro” video. No idea if the software is actually usable. I’d just buy an iPhone 11 or 12. Large pixel size, good stabilization, and good software. You can shoot RAW with the Halide app.

>>3769338
pixel 4 or iphone 12

>>3767234
Are you me? The 200-600mm is cheaper than the Sony 100-400mm. So if you want a wildlife lens it’s the 200-600mm. If you want a versatile everyday carry and travel lens you can put take everywhere you and even have in the city without looking like a lunatic it’s the 100-400mm. Iirc the sigma looks sharp enough at 400mm but has issues with subject tracking for moving subjects, but it may be updated by now. The tripod ring of the sigma costs extra but it’s still around half price of the 200-600. The sigma 100-400mm does also have lens IS. Check reviews. I saw the Sony 100-400 and 200-600 side by side and the size difference is huge.

If you live in a place where it’s not ridiculous to rent them for a week or a month I would do that. Here it’s to expensive. It’s too hard to pick without enough time to try them.

>>3769396
is the tamron 28-75 f2.8 a good pick-up?

>>3769416
yes, just get it. I got mine for 650 on FM

Do anyone here recommend the 7artisans lens? I want to buy a 7.5 mm Fish Eye because goddamn, it's so cheap.

What can you tell me about this brand?

>>3765760
>>3765766
kek based samefag