Go /p/ro: • Please post images that are JPG format and ideally smaller than 1 MB, and/or about 1000 pixels on the longest side. • Expect to be judged harshly. Learn to deal with it. Want: • We come here for photos, so post yours as often as possible, even if "image unrelated" to your text. • "Flickr/500px/Tumblr/Facebook/Portfolio" threads are for critique and networking. • Use "Recent Photos" threads if you are shy or only want to post a couple of photos. • Shared raw files which we can collectively edit for discussion of post-processing techniques, are encouraged. • Use the Catalog to consolidate similar topics (photographic themes, images or technical gear threads). Do not want: • Go to /wsr/ or /r/ for specific Photoshop requests. • Gear threads are discouraged, but identified as necessary. Many users simply hide these threads. Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>THE Canonical Website For Gear Says Isos Below 3000-32000 Are Effectively Equivalent To Iso-100 In Noise>turns out it was a lie?
>>4067830think before you speak, moop
>>4067832 did you mean to quote >>4067828?
>>4067838>When you quote the wrong reply so you can question yourself to try to imply you're not the only person on your teamGood god, thanks for the reminder of what the sad sacks that inhibit this place are really like.
>>4067844you really need to take your meds moop
>>4062398>buys a chinkshit lens>is upset when it's shitsounds like a typical consumer
cute camera editionPrevious : >>4050674
>>4067788Are you me? >>4067077 Read the replies
hmm... interestingmacro tilt for fuji-x
>>4067769I get classic neg with my X-T3, but only by selecting it in Capture One after the fact.
>>4067691just let the LCD die and you got yourself an X-Pro3-D
>>4067744bruh i own a 90's agfa camera and the screen works fine, blame fuji for choosing shitty providers
Post your cuties and general gear discussion.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1280Image Height960
>>4067712It's actually a turd lens that is infamous for constantly having focus just slightly off.
>>4067714that's more like super 35mm
I found a pair of old Canon 16 MB SD & MMC memory cards. The MMC one allows 24 pictures to be taken when I set the camera to save 2MP normal quality JPEGs. The SD card is more stingy with just 23 frames. Might be fun to use these and shoot digital like film.
>>4067804What makes you say that? Isn't he using lenses initially meant for 16mm cameras?
>>4067819I totally forgot about how when SD cards came out, they were trying to be similar to the long running standard for data storage, compact discs. The D in the logo is like a disc, and they used a 1x 2x speed rating like a drive. I am kind of glad cfexpress is becoming the new standard camera media.
what's up nerds, I haven't been on here in a decade. is /p/ any good anymore or is still gearfagging?currently going through 2011-2015 photo archives and i'll spam pics until I attract the oldfagsp related was in marsielle with an a7r and either my voigt 50 1.4 or the 35 1.2
>>4065581this one is good>>4065577this too
>>4066230Where is this?
>>4066267>Instagram is probably the best place to find models these daysIt's real hit and miss for me. I'm always very transparent as a I slide into DM's, but I think I lack the charm. My work should speak for itself, and reassure anyone afraid of me wanting nudes.
>>4065587I remember you posting this. The seething was real.>>4065577>>4065581>>4065586>>4065588>>4065589>>4065593>>4065596These are fucking great, man.
>>4066976another manchild who never grew up and learned that others can see his yes-man shenanigans. No social skills begets a very awkward late twenties."Nouveau" lmao, quite the cringe but I am glad it is legal to be yourself.
Beginner trying to understand photography better. What makes this Ansel Adams image better than others taking a similar image? What is it about this photo that makes it a "masterpiece"?
>>4056047forget all rules and don’t fall for subject memesubject is what you shooting
>>4067491It's sad and pathetic that the existence of a grown man is based on the validation that you get from women.
>>4067702Taking that as a strong yes.
>>4059254it actually ends in -witz, you faggotnice try tho
>>4067462Your pseudo-spiritual teenage word salad is pretty cringe bro, if you're interested in this stuff, at least read the thinkers who wrote about it and try to understand what they say, instead of regurgitating a poorly understood version of it trying "own the libs".Also everything is political means that everything can be looked at through the prism of politics, doesn't mean you have to
Hello /p/. I got my first proper DSLR a while ago so I'm still just getting started with raw editing. I think I improved from the last time I made this thread (also got a 50mm f1.8) but I'd still like feedback. I feel like I'm missing something that can probably be achieved through better use of the exposure curve and color gradingFeel free to post your shitty edits too[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
I made this RawTherapee Profile while high on shrooms, no clue how it ended up this good.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7M2Camera SoftwareRawTherapee 5.8Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Focal Length (35mm Equiv)0 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width3792Image Height5680Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2022:01:22 16:25:58Exposure Time1/50 secF-Numberf/0.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating800Brightness-2.8 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceShadeFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length0.00 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4062842thanks fren>>4062855looks really nice
>>4062842this
>>4062855Mind sharing the profile? Looks amazing
>>4062855>no clue how it ended up this goodit didn't though. you've got some weird clipping going on and lifted blacks stopped being a thing 5 years ago.
mad city editionPrevious thread: >>4059763Previous previous thread: >>4056023Starting out, still feeling uncomfortable with street photos[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-S10Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 11.0.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.4Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)45 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2022:08:08 21:12:16Exposure Time1/2400 secF-Numberf/1.4Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating160Lens Aperturef/1.4Brightness8.4 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length30.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
tighter version[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS M50Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 5.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2022:08:12 18:42:12Exposure Time1/100 secF-Numberf/11.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating320Lens Aperturef/11.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo FlashFocal Length40.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4067736ok you're a troll
>>4067750He probably is. I like the texture the shadow of the hat creates, and the lips look normal and not dry and jagged. I imagine most harsh and useless criticism on this board is from people who don't shoot or post.
>>4067750Not even close. I didn't even say that the pic was bad. If it's perfect for your taste, good for you, but don't seethe because I disagree with you.
I took this with my phone and I'm kind of pleased with it. Who will judge my work?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
How can I make my backlit shots look like this? I've never seen anything like this, it looks incredible
>>4064728Please don’t flex film dr like this thanks
>>4064728what the heck is this?
>>4063630>postLOL, the blanket solution for lazy, incompetent bumblers. I was making shots like this well before there was such a thing as a home computer, let alone programs like Photoshop or Lightroom. Just learn your trade. If you had grown up having to make the most of a 20 exposure roll of expensive film, you'd learn how to get it right SOOC.
>>4066792A giraffe.
Any camera with a lens that's f stop is < f/3.0. Very easy.
I spend $2,500 on a camera and don't know how to use itWhat's the quickest way to start taking pictures like an enthusiast?
>>4067558>when i put my glass of water on my windowsillkek, sounds like the exact type of photo i would expect from someone who obsesses over camera settings rather than just focusing on taking a photo.Here's the reality: in my.. oh, say, 15 or 16 years on /p/, I have seen many tens of thousands of fucked-up photos with shitty settings from guys who were trying to master the "exposure triangle". Meanwhile, there are tons of people taking incredible photos with their phone without ever worrying about what shutter speed and ISO the phone chose. It turns out, that "software developer" halfway across the world knows a fuckton more about photography than you or i or anyone else on this board. He's been building cameras for a very long time, standing on the shoulders of other people who have also been building cameras for a very long time, representing multiple generations of the top experts in their field. And when they put a metering system in their camera, they're building upon a huge database of images encompassing 99% of the scenarios that you or i will ever come across in our humdrum daily lives. So yeah, you can trust Program (Professional mode) to do all of the heavy lifting for a beginner and let them focus on the truly important shit, like lighting, framing, focal length and how it affects an image, and generally being present in the moment for a photo, rather than grappling with the camera trying to get it just right. You don't get extra special brownie boy points for setting the camera yourself. You just, occasionally, get to nudge the depth of field a little further out. When a beginner gets to the point that they start asking questions like "how do I get only this part in focus?", then they can learn the exposure triangle. In the meantime, their time is better spent just shooting as many frames as possible. You wouldn't start someone off on the violin by teaching them a major scale, right? No, you teach them Twinkle, Twinkle Little Star.
>>4067587nobody unironically calls program mode "professional mode" so it's obvious you're trolling and i'm going to stop responding to you. please refrain from fucking with beginners though, this board needs more people taking pictures and fewer gearfags.
>>4067771Nothing anyone does is unironic you cuck. My advice is solid and is borne out of more experience than you can fathom.
>>4067771Our savior Ken Rockwell does
>>4067587all in all that's better than the fujuslugs going full manual when they don't get the basics of exposure, so they go with ISO 12000 for a dailight picture of people going through a terminal because they "wanted to freeze motion"
ITT Photos where you successfully captured "L'instant décisif"
>>4067809I cut a slit and stick it in! That's how pros do it!
>>4067821Sorry gentlemen, I thought I was on /b/...
>>4067806Then leave!
Wtf i love this board now
>>4067787>>4067809> contents under pressureopening them will unleash a tidal wave of fat.
• Theme: Birds• Deadline: From 24 July to 14 AugustTheme:• The photo has to feature at least one birdRules:• Photo must be taken during the timeline. Images taken before this thread was started won't count.• Post images with exif, if possible. If you can't, just state that they were taken during the timeline.• Three entries per photographer max.• A day after the competition ends, all valid images will be posted for voting.Optional:• You're encouraged to post your images that fit the theme even if they're out of competition.• You may name your images if you wish.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4060459[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
I fucked up this picture tremendously, I think something is wrong with my lens. There is a tiny bit of play when its on the body and it will randomly make my camera read f/0 randomly if I gently twist the lens.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D780Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 5.4 (Windows)Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern792Focal Length (35mm Equiv)600 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2022:08:06 21:25:56Exposure Time1/800 secF-Numberf/6.3Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating800Lens Aperturef/6.3Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length600.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingCustomExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4067793Weird. Is there an aperture ring or is it all internal?
>>4067746how is there no storytelling? You can practically expect the talented Mr Ripley to show up at any moment. Why are you such a cuck?
>>4067815Everything does random stuff
Why do all of my wildlife photos look like ass? > Seriously though, what is going on with all this streaky banding in the out of focus areas?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D3500Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 11.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/6.3Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern844Focal Length (35mm Equiv)450 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2022:08:06 01:38:04Exposure Time1/40 secF-Numberf/6.3Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/6.3Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length300.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4067699>My arbitrary definition of digital zoom!So, 2 things.1. You already forgot the Wikipedia definition of digital zoom "Digital zoom is a method of decreasing the precise angle of view of a digital photograph or video image. It is accomplished by cropping an image". Do you see them mention enlarging anything?2. Even if you did enlarge the image 11mp cropped image, you're not losing any detail, in fact most modern algorithms do a spectacular job on upscaling. It's still going to be downscaled to 8mp to fit on a 4k screen isn't it. Do you think there's any difference between a 11mp image and a 200mp image when they're getting scaled down to 8mp regardless? If you do, then you're very thick, if you don't, then I was correct all alongWhat's it gonna be petal, admit I was right or you're wrong?
>>4067721You're both retarded.Sensor size does matter, but not for any of the reasons you are stating.As pixel diameter approaches the wavelength of light, the photon's super position changes as the wave function collapses. if the pixels are smaller than the wave length, the chance of it's position entering an adjacent pixel, outside its average position, increases. As pixel size increases the likelyhood of multiple photons of different wavelengths entering the same pixel increases. both of these would cause distortion, especially when magnified to visible proportions.the only way to increase mp past a certain limit is to increase sensor size. Pic is of the megapixel count for "full frame" sensor in the range of the light spectrum.Most cameras are already somewhere in this range, and it's all a trade off for different spectrums as to how accurate your pixel positions will be.beyond this range, if you want more detail at greater >crop, zoom, whatever, you're both retarded.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Just keep at it anon. My photos suck too, but the only way to get better is to keep doing it.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D7200Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 5.3 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/6.3Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern824Focal Length (35mm Equiv)900 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2022:05:30 16:52:08Exposure Time1/3000 secF-Numberf/9.5Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating800Lens Aperturef/9.5Exposure Bias-1/2 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length600.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessHardSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4067795That's actually pretty nice considering how far away it is. Good uuuu.
>>4065722Hey now, that's a very nice picture.Nice cock.
Zoom Zoom EditionAll video related questions and discussion is intended for this thread. Here we discuss techniques, gear and anything else related to capturing video footage. Please don't pretend to be an expert if you don't know what you're talking about. Kindly leave your ego at the door.Posting short films/scripts or other work you've done is encouraged.We tend to use and recommend DSLRs/mirrorless cameras because they provide phenomenal picture quality for their price, have large sensors (ie the same size used in high-end cinema cameras and higher) and have interchangeable lenses.In contrast, consumer camcorders normally have much smaller sensors and a fixed lens.>STICKY - https://textbin.net/xv9ls4ozjh>Helpful guide, additional books and more in-depth FAQs - https://web.archive.org/web/20200926115310/https://pastebin.com/kG0gRmTZ>NO ONE CARES WHAT AN EXPERT YOU THINK YOU ARE. IF YOU’RE ASKING BASIC-AS-SHIT QUESTIONS, YOU CAN’T BE ALL THAT GREAT. SEE ABOVEPrevious thread >>4037468Quick FAQS>what’s the best camera available on a “budget”?Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
yall faggots cant even cine
>>4067739what is an cine
>>4067741
>>4067781>broad side lit>dead eyes with zero eyelightnot kino at all
>>4067651They do worse things in documentaries
Imme a creep.Imme a weirdo.I like the park :DDD[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot SD1000Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image Created2022:08:09 20:52:27Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/8.0ISO Speed Rating80Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias-1/3 EVMetering ModePatternFlashFlash, Compulsory, Red-Eye ReduceFocal Length5.80 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
También fui al parque hace rato, pero mis fotos estuvieron horribles, mejor subo las tuyas a insta[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeXiaomiCamera ModelMi A1Camera Softwaretissot-user 8.1.0 OPM1.171019.026 V9.6.8.0.ODHMIFE release-keysSensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)52 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationRight-Hand, TopHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2019:02:26 19:08:54Exposure Time1/30 secF-Numberf/2.6Exposure ProgramNot DefinedISO Speed Rating2500Lens Aperturef/2.6Brightness-2.5 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length5.99 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4000Image Height3000Exposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardTime (UTC)
>>4066879Giving me nice digishit vibes. Love em.
>>4067785Ya las subí todas. Mamaste por lento.
>>4067798They're shot on digishit, fren :DD
>>4067783AYYY, yo conozco a ese cabrón.Tienes razón, pinche edición culera, arruinó unos retratos decentes.
