Go /p/ro:• Please post images that are JPG format, smaller than 1 MB, and/or about 1000 pixels on the longest side. • Expect to be judged harshly. Learn to deal with it.Want:• We come here for photos, so post yours as often as possible, even if "image unrelated" to your text.• "Flickr/500px/Tumblr/Facebook/Portfolio" threads are for critique and networking• Use "Recent Photos" threads if you are shy or only want to post a couple of photos.• Shared raw files which we can collectively edit for discussion of post-processing techniques, are encouraged.• Use the catalog to consolidate similar topics (photographic themes, images or technical gear threads)Do Not Want:• Go to >>>/r/ for specific Photoshop requests.• Gear threads are discouraged, but identified as necessary. Many users simply hide these threads.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>3603215Normally it defaults to continuous autofocus in video mode. Manual focus is typically best on video anyway, if you can get your head around it you get way more out of video work manually focusing rather than hoping the camera reads your mind for you.
>>3603206I will probably get it, but the Tamron is lighter by 300g
>>3603217For stuff I've set up, I can do manual, but when I'm taking video of my nephew running around I have to track and rely. Just weird how it'll back focus and won't find him until I hold the shutter down
Is low light performance enough of a reason to upgrade to an a7ii/a7iii? Like, can I get a 2.8 zoom lens for FF and it will perform as good in lowlight as 1.4/1.8 primes on my apsc?
>>3603223a7ii is decent in lowlight, but the a7iii is like a mini a7Sii for low light. 2.8 on FF is about the same as a 1.4 prime is on APS-C, but you'll have higher flexibility when it comes to ISO numbers.
guys, honest opinion, does this look shopped to you or there's just something very wrong with perspective?I mean the body, especially the legs, looks weird as fuck, but why would you shop them like that, it just looks deformed, so maybe it's just a weird shot
>>3602360It looks extremely homosexual not photoshopped.
>>3602360It's just teh tilt and gay.
>>3602360>>>/fit/Weird shortsSkip leg day erryday Weird stance and poseOdd lighting... so just overall weird
>>3602658>skip leg day errydayDude, he skipped everything every day.
Still gay.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.14Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2020:01:19 15:21:49Color Space InformationsRGB
plustek editionold thread: >>3598177All analog/film photography related questions and general discussion is to take place in this thread.35mm, 120, medium format, large format, instant, polaroid, instax, C41, E6, B&W, developing, scanning, labs, darkroom etc.Post photos as often as possible, we want to see that beautiful grainy goodness!useful links:http://istillshootfilm.org/beginners-guide-film-photographyhttps://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.phphttp://industrieplus.net/dxdatabase>posting in /fgt/ doesn't make you gay, unless you're still getting the lab to scan your images
Do you even print? If you print, what's the largest size you ever printed at?>>3603130I gave you a print size, but the 300dpi are still enough to print at 8x12.>>36031361080p for IG is more than enough. You forget about viewing distance. Nobody notices it only 300dpi unless they stick their nose to it. I don't care about your nitpicking on PPI vs. DPI. There is a reason scientific journals demand 300dpi for photos.Color casts can be corrected in software before making the final scan. Still, the time it takes to scan the next frame can be used to correct anything in PS.
>>3603199>I gave you a print size, but the 300dpi are still enough to print at 8x12.Anon, 300dpi is enough to print 24x36mm.I think you're confused how the settings work. If you go by print size, and put 300dpi, it means as you adjust the print size, the scanner will adjust the scanning dpi automatically to give you 300dpi at the selected print size.>If you print, what's the largest size you ever printed at?8x10" for most random shots, I find it the most practical (4x5" too small). Occasionally higher, up to 20x24". Above that it gets really expensive and impractical, you need huge drums/trays to develop, and an enlarger with a rail as tall as yourself.
>>3602728Guys, I found a BeLOMO Vilia Auto for sale in this shop near me. Should I buy it for 2 USD?
Hi. Just wanted to have a helping opinion.I found a canon f1 for sale. It would be great to replace my ae-1 that has (i think) some problems with its lightmeter. The f1 is at 200$.But i also want to buy a mamiya c2 with 3 lenses, a light meter and filters. That is at 325$.So in your opinion what should i do?
>>3603220Figure out what's wrong with your AE-1 and stop buying shit you don't need
Previous thread: >>3597650>All discussion and questions related to gear should take place in this exact thread.>Redirection and answering questions in this thread is encouraged.
>>3603179why fotodiox? i hate collectors that dont use shit. like nigga take photos
I first time shot at an smaller event for a friend yesterday but I only had the xpro1I used the 35mm 1.4, worked surprsingly well, but I sometimes needed zoom or wider shots and my kit lens couldn't do itIf I wanted to upgrade for more low light performance, do newer Fuji cameras have that or would I have to get a fullframe camera?
is the new E-mount sigma 24-70mm better than the tamron 28-75mm? The tamron is $300 cheaper for me here.
>>3603180not him but fotodiox stuff is tough and cheap as hell
>>3603216vs kf?
Anyone interested in a Glasgow meetup?We had one before but only two of us showed up, maybe we'll have more luck if we try again? https://archive.nyafuu.org/p/thread/3350906/#q3353833
>>3602828Maybe, but pretty much all meetups bring only the sociably deficient aspies from their caves don't they?All I can see a /p/ meetup being is just gearboasting nonsense. What are a bunch of guys holding cameras in glasgow going to do that's not fucking gay anyway?
>>3603083>what are a bunch of guys holding cameras in Glasgow going to do that's not fucking gay anyway? I dunno, take photos with them? I know that's a foreign concept to the Sonynggers on this board.
>>3602828Call me when it's an East Bloc meetup, more interesting sights and way cheaper. I'm not going to pay for bong accommodation.
>>3603188>I dunno, take photos with them?aka>take photo's of other people holding cameras&>everyone snapshitting the same mildly interesting thing passing by
>>3603210Jesus, you're bitter. You go on a photo walk, like you would on your own, but with someone else with you. And you can stop for a pint of beer or a meal at any point with some good conversation. I don't know why snapshitting mildly interesting things passing by is somehow more pathetic to you when done in a group. Most photography "clubs" or meets incorporate some kind of photo walk because it's a good chance to stretch your photography muscles and compare the shots you got compared to the guy next to you. You're actively doing the thing you're interested in but with other people.Can't believe I have to explain this to you, Jesus.
New IG thread - post your Instagram profiles so you can stroke your ego even moreRate others, provide critique, and follow if you see anything you like[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2019 (Macintosh)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2019:12:10 00:28:15CommentScreenshotColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width693Image Height1500
>>3602323Fair enough. I'll go real quick since I've posted mine two times. >>3601913Absolutely adore the storefront pictures and the colours on the subway entrance right there! I'd enjoy it even more if the pictures were grouped by occasion/theme. Nonetheless very nice pictures!>>3602311Not quite enough to get specific here. So far I like the train-stop. Mainly for its symetrie. >>3601911A bit all over the place - especially the film-strip one in the midst of the others. I feel like you have very good subjects/places at your disposal but you're not quite making the most of it. I enjoy the photo in the subway though. >>3600135Great photos and a layout that's easy on the eyes. Noice. Love the cat one. >>3600122Aesthetic - yes. But the editing is a bit all over the place. Love me some good cute girl wandering around shots so I'll take it!
How can I make my phone pictures look like this?
>>3602351>A bit all over the place - especially the film-strip one in the midst of the othersYou're right. I have a hard time sticking to a consistent layout.>I enjoy the photo in the subway though. Thanks!
>>3602481get a phone with a bad camera
>>3602311I feel like your images are a bit empty.That's my problem with film photography on IG. Sometimes I feel like the fact that you have that film looks carries the images over the subject while it should be the other way around for me. I get that you have this mood, but I feel like the mood should emphasize the subject to make the picture.Film is probably the best way to tell a story or give a certain ambiance that leaves to the imagination. It's lacking a bit here.
Does this mean anyone posting on instagram etc are professionals since they get paid with Likes?
I make way more than I think I could as a pro photographer.Through my job I also get to travel to lots of places all over the world and have LOTS of free time.
>>3602015The only way to make even near my current office worker salary in photography is to shoot weddings and I have no interest in photographing people. I shoot rocks, trees and water, and there is no market for that.
I like my current job better than photography.
>>3602015I don't want to hate my hobby. It's my refuge for relaxing and just being with myself.
I think my sensor is going out, should I buy another one or upgrade to something else? I'm more than happy with the photos I was getting out of this and have quite a few APS-C lenses. It looks like the newer Sony crop frame cameras are a lot more expensive and geared more toward bloggers. I have 0 interest in video.
>>3603055How is that even relevant when OP already has the lenses he needs?
>>3603062he can sell them u moron
>>3603066Why should he? Your argument is that no new lenses will be developed, therefore the camera is shit. But it doesn't affect you if you already have the lenses you need.
>>3602872Well, there aren't really many features that could be added for stills, but they FINALLY support 1:1 and 4:3 aspect ratios and they seriously improved AF.If you really want to upgrade the beaten path is to get full frame.
>>3603054maybe the inside just needs drying time, happened to my A6K when sea water spashed on the hot shoe mount causing a notification error. or check the sensor visually if there is dust or sand inside. or get it checked first before you buy another gear.
Show me THE most beautiful woman you've ever seen.Not the hottest, just someone you'd consider an embodiment of gods talented artistry.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareGoogleImage-Specific Properties:
>>3600370>skin cancerNo
>>3601479nigger lips
>>3600330I don't have a picture of her, but a girl who works at an escape room I went to.
>>3600445This but with rape being bad, fiveheads being detested, and fascism being the only correct group ethical position.
I'm looking for a good secondary camera that I can carry around much easier than my DSLR. I've been looking around at compact cameras and I'd really like the Ricoh GR III, but I'm not ready to spend the premium for a camera that I'm not sure about. Does anyone have any thoughts on the GR II? Is it comparable to the GR III, and is it worth the price on the secondary market?
>>3603057What you want is the Ricoh Gr Digital (2006) the very first digital Ricoh Gr ever made. You can find one for maybe $100 on eBay. It will fit in your pocket and dust isn't much of an issue. I get some lag rarely when I change the iso (but sticking to P mode and using the spot meter setting to get the right exposure is the easiest way to shoot this camera). It's extremely portable and will fit in any pocket. Startup time is pretty snappy and it has a very primitive snap focus that allows you to press the shutter all the way down in a single motion and will yield a in focus image (if your SS is too low and you're handholding then this will effect it much more) about 9/10 times. (I think it has something to do with the tiny sensor and wide lens). Of course if you like it then you could consider upgrading to the apsc sized versions, but I think you'll find the gr digital to be very capable.
>>3603057Just get the Mi Note 10 Pro
>>3603184Shut the fuck up Chinese spy
>>3603061terrible bait.
>>3603057if you want something low cost and comparable to the GRIII's sensor, then XF10 is another option, just use snap focus most the time. Currently can even get it for around $360 bnew with fuji intl wrty
Post stupid questions that need no extra thread. Use /gear/ for gear related stupid questions.Previous is getting buried:>>3586593
>>3602769
How are these pictures made?I mean, there's an unnatural color texture to it that makes it look like a painting or something like that.
>>3603160boomer hdr + clarity slider abuse
>>3595884Do newer non full frame f mount lenses work on Nikon film cameras (specifically a f3)
>>3603178Your F3 will not work with G lenses (as well as E and AF-P ones that are newer than G). The F4 works with G lenses.VR won't work, you need a F5, F100 or F80 for that.
Hi, I've been trying to be a lot more mindful of composition within my shots. I was hoping to post a few here so you guys can give me some pointers/tell me what works/what doesn't. These were all shot on the same day.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpi
im trying to fuckin' add a white boarder to this shit, but I can't for the life of me work out a good way. Fuck it - no borders for now.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS CORPORATIONCamera Modelu30D,S410D,u410DCamera SoftwareVersion 1.1Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.1Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2020:01:18 17:14:15Exposure Time1/2 secF-Numberf/3.1Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating80Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length5.80 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2048Image Height1536RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalCompression SettingUnknownMacro ModeNormal
I like the repetition of 2 in this one.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS CORPORATIONCamera Modelu30D,S410D,u410DCamera SoftwareVersion 1.1Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.1Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2020:01:18 17:04:00Exposure Time1/30 secF-Numberf/3.1Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating250Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashFlash, CompulsoryFocal Length5.80 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2048Image Height1536RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalCompression SettingUnknownMacro ModeNormal
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpi
>>3602534what the fuck did he mean by this
>>3603027https://www.artybollocks.com/
For some Reason i find it pretty well done.Is it good, is it bad?What would you improve about it to make it even better?
>>3599989Pretty good
>>3599989NI-
Album cover photography thread?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1280Image Height1280
>>3601741sure
>>3601741Virgin Killer remains undefeated
Last thread: https://archive.nyafuu.org/p/thread/3585474/#3585474I know how to use my camera better and a bit more about post, and I feel like I'm actually taking worse pictures. Or at least, not as good as I want, but if I wait to only post what I really like I won't post anything.
>>3602176LAnScApE PhOtOgRaPhY[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 50DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2019 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2020:01:17 16:52:55Exposure Time1/160 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/4.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length17.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1080Image Height720RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>3602591flyyy me to the mooon[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 50DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2019 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2020:01:17 17:25:31Exposure Time1/100 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/4.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length17.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1080Image Height608RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>3602624tfw you post something only to realize you forgot to disable f.lux
First attempt at exposure blending in PS. Any/all thoughts appreciated[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 50DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2019 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.7Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2020:01:18 21:18:15Exposure Time1/500 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length64.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1080Image Height720RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
taken in the public library[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D5000Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern760Focal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution150 dpiVertical Resolution150 dpiImage Created2020:01:17 20:34:01Exposure Time1/640 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating800Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length18.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
