File: StreetIsDead.jpg (8 KB, 310x163)

8 KB JPG

>>4135455
street is dead
>npc drones on phones

>>4135455
Who said you can't take moments? You're the one who limiting yourself.

>>4135455
>Isn't street all about capturing the moment
Street is about capturing the urban landscape with its denizens as protagonists or as scale references.
It's not about candid shit like the french weirdos said 60 years later.

>>4135455
If you had a favorable early life and zero respect for the people around you.

White people are drawn to this idea of street because it absolves them of work, talent etc. But you don't have the early life to pull it off.

>>4135455
What the point of moment if you only take pic of their back lol.
If you're that socially awkward just pay a bloody model for your photoshoots and be done with it.

3D

>>4135371
It's open on sundays, so some satanist child-diddling operation going on in there

the blurry sign seems to have a clue
D.....
D.....
D.....
if you can read that, you should be able to fugure it out

searchin "3D Department store logo blue 3 red d" yielded a clue on faceberg, but it is getting flagged as spam.

Danners
Discount
Department

>>4134924
>completely useless but glad i found it

it seems i've found the old guard

File: FFD80D79-277A-439A-BB0D-C(...).jpg (166 KB, 1170x1223)

166 KB JPG

I’m still upset over this. If they got rid of the lcd snd sold it for 300-600 this would have been a mega smash hit
Why is no other company making these?.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	216 dpi
Vertical Resolution	216 dpi
Image Width	1170
Image Height	1223

>>4135600
It’s easier to sell a set of filters to instantly make iPhone videos “film quality”

>>4135600
>$3000 for a camera that requires you to buy constant physical film to use, produces a soft image, has no lowlight or interchangeable lenses, and is a bitch to edit when you actually get your expensive footage
Gee, I can't imagine why this idea doesn't seem more popular...

>>4135642
>produces a soft image, has no lowlight or interchangeable lenses, and is a bitch to edit when you actually get your expensive footage
you could've just said a super-8 camera

>>4135389
unless he captures the steam, that's literally distilled water.

>>4135013
>what's the downside
You need to buy some distilled water do to the action that could be done with regular water.
As for me this is nothing but downside.
In general distilled water is ok, I'm diluting long term chemicals in it. Anyway Adoflo I dilute in drinking water (filtered tap water).

>>4135458
>sunstar
are you trying to shoot at f16 at night? rowdy.

>>4135617
Any problems with that?

>>4135669
no it's just hard, but now that i think about it, shooting 3 stops different you'd still need a tripod i guess.

File: jak1.jpg (497 KB, 2364x1773)

497 KB JPG

Probably enough for now.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: sid2.jpg (349 KB, 1672x1254)

349 KB JPG

but what kind of noob post would this be without a lamp post?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>4135630
good on ya

>>4135643
>>4135654
>>4135662 (absolutely noob without lamppost)
i liek

keep posting moar, best thread in a while

>>4135636
This is some ai stuff at least a rendered image, no? I'm feeling startled to uneasy - calling the uncanny valley.

>>4135630
A matter that's enjoyed by /p/. Mute colors, simplicity in what's shown. Have a look in new topo or Egglestone, if you're into that. For /p/ you should've straightened the verticals - I'm in doubt whether that's necessary.

>>4135637
Did you say newb? I see it may be easy, yet it's good!

>>4135638
You're right on Suger's heels! :) Please someone link or post Sugar's shot.

>>4135680
>keep posting moar

File: DSCN1693.jpg (1.34 MB, 3072x2304)

1.34 MB JPG

>>4135664

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON
Camera Model	E7600
Camera Software	E7600v1.0
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	38 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	0000:00:00 00:00:00
Exposure Time	1/190 sec
F-Number	f/4.8
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	50
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	7.80 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3072
Image Height	2304
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Color Mode	COLOR
Image Quality	NORMAL
White Balance	AUTO
Image Sharpening	AUTO
Focus Mode	AF-S
ISO Selection	AUTO
Image Adjustment	NORMAL
Lens Adapter	OFF
Auto Focus	Center
Saturation	Normal
Noise Reduction	OFF

File: DSCN1686.jpg (1.35 MB, 3072x2304)

1.35 MB JPG

>>4135668

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON
Camera Model	E7600
Camera Software	E7600v1.0
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	38 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	0000:00:00 00:00:00
Exposure Time	2/353 sec
F-Number	f/4.8
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	50
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	7.80 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3072
Image Height	2304
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Color Mode	COLOR
Image Quality	NORMAL
White Balance	AUTO
Image Sharpening	AUTO
Focus Mode	AF-S
ISO Selection	AUTO
Image Adjustment	NORMAL
Lens Adapter	OFF
Auto Focus	Right
Saturation	Normal
Noise Reduction	OFF

File: IMG_0297-2.jpg (924 KB, 1200x900)

924 KB JPG

>>4134670
Nice. I've been doing these through-the-car-window shots at car shows lately too. Fun aesthetic.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon PowerShot S500
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.4 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.2
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2023:02:04 13:22:54
Exposure Time	1/400 sec
F-Number	f/3.2
ISO Speed Rating	50
Lens Aperture	f/3.2
Exposure Bias	-1 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	9.09 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: DSCN1627.jpg (1.35 MB, 3072x2304)

1.35 MB JPG

>>4135673

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON
Camera Model	E7600
Camera Software	E7600v1.0
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	38 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	0000:00:00 00:00:00
Exposure Time	2/93 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	50
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	7.80 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3072
Image Height	2304
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Color Mode	COLOR
Image Quality	NORMAL
White Balance	AUTO
Image Sharpening	AUTO
Focus Mode	AF-S
ISO Selection	AUTO
Image Adjustment	NORMAL
Lens Adapter	OFF
Auto Focus	Center
Saturation	Normal
Noise Reduction	OFF

File: Sony DCR VX-2000 PIC00032.png (194 KB, 640x480)

194 KB PNG

>>4130784
is this low res enough lol

>>4135671
I heard. Not sure how that will impact me. Sadge nonetheless.
Looks like R8 is going to be vlogger product also, so likely no viewfinder. They are definitely testing new waters.

>>4135674
If you're using a high MP camera to take images for 4chan and instagram, you may think that, but you may also use literally anything for that application.

>>4135676
Generally pretty happy with the full sized output after processing the raws as well under those terms, even pixel peeping them. Granted, it's feasible maybe I'm more comfortable with or better at using certain noise reduction techniques than others (Darktable affords you a lot more fine tuning than LR/C1 after all), or also simply can tolerate more in an image (imo luma noise can be totally ignorable or even flattering, as long as I stomp out any visible chroma), who knows.

>>4135675
Well, you just need the perspective of someone getting in, then it sucks. You want to avoid the adapter and are reluctant to build a system with a former, rather than the current mount. However, the current version is an expensive proposition for which a cheaper used market has yet to be established, and there are some gaps in the offering as Canon initially intended to add new things rather than replace lenses directly, taking into account the existing EF system. Kinda all credit and loyalty to their user base. But you seem to be screwed if you are new.

>>4135682
Yeah, exactly that. I have 2 cheap lenses, so its not a factor moving forward.
Which is why it looks like buying EOS R now and then in a few years upgrading to whatever (if even needed) is the best idea.
Maybe thats why R prices are not budging, it is that one affordable entry mirrorless FF Canon.

>>4135127
>rear display eye-piece and liveview
do DSLRcucks really? why do they seethe at mirrorless then try to imitate it in such an archaic way?

>>4134816
I appreciate Carver and respect his commitment to what it is that he does and I will continue to follow him but I just don't think he has a talent for picking his subject matter nor his perspective. I'm sorry to say that because, again, I do like him in a general photography sense. I just don't think he's talented. I mean, he's limited by the equipment he uses, of course, so his perspective is often forced into this little windowbox of where he can even physically setup and spend his autistic amount of time doing whatever autistic things he has going on in his head but it often just doesn't lend itself to an interesting photograph, despite it's cleanliness or true to life feeling. I guess what I'm trying to say is that he's a gearfag, just a wannabe old-timey gearfag. And that there's nothing really special to his work other than he's an old-timey gearfag who acts like an old-timey gearfag. And an old-timey gearfag can just as much a gearfag as a new gearfag. Ya feel me?

>>4135338
I can't believe you spent effort to write this shit

>>4135338
Coping because he doesn’t take random photos of strangers in new york

>>4135338
He's a gearfag or a wannabe gearfag? You can't have it both ways.

i stopped shooting film because i felt like an idiot for wasting so much of it.

>>4135541
I stopped shooting film because I was sick of paying a premium to use an inferior imaging technology.

I might 3d print a technical camera later and shoot the odd sheet but I'm not touching anything under 6x7 if I can help it.

>>4135572
Yeah sure you will nophoto lmao

>>4135620
Go spend $30 on another roll of velvia filmtard

>>4135572
>inferior
kek
bayertards as usual

>>4133295
Tried to take pictures of the northern lights, I don't know how to do it with my camera. Took some ok pictures with my iphone.

>>4133260
Yeah, almost no tress in Iceland

>only white peoples
Where is the diversity???!
It should be called WhitesLand not iceland.

>>4133404
I rented a car from Alamo in Keflavik , the manager was a nigger.

>>4133404
Iceland is full of blonde girls, it's amazing.

>>4132973
Your'e brain lee

can someone explain to me what is the deal with astro? You are literally shooting far away specks of light that look exactly the same to everyone on Earth at any time. There is no composition, no creative exposure modes (stars are either correctly exposed and tracked or they are not) and there is nothing that hasn't bren photographed before in a better way with better equipment

>>4135618
The Milky Way is cool, I guess? It’s weird and kind of gay to buy star shots instead of taking one? Sorry I even brought it up.

>>4135603
Great advice, thanks
Still open to other suggestions as well

>>4135625
dunno, sounds like buying an expensive measuring tool and then going to France to measure the standard meter

File: pissMode.jpg (257 KB, 1254x1672)

257 KB JPG

>>4135618
you can stack images with zoom lenses and telescopes to get objects the naked eye can't see.
You can also play around with foreground objects, trees, mountains, etc for composition and framing.
I used to do timelapse on a moving rail. Many things to explore. Though I'm assuming you were just neg posting.
If you're somewhere you can shoot the milkyway, you are probably in a beautiful location.
>>4135625
don't be sorry anon, astrophotography is good shit

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>4135621
photography isn't real art. you can learn everything as you go and nothing is wasted, you at least get the memories. and as art it relies on the foundation of truth. even a mediocre photograph by academic art student wank can be famous because of what's in it.

>>4135612
used Nikon Z5 and a 28/2.8 or 40/2, does everything you need within your budget, also post photos

>>4135629
sorry except zoom but you can buy a zoom lens later in life, FTZ + 80-200 or something will be around 700-1000 more, or just get the P series camera with the fixed zoom lens, great for everything

>>4135612
Bridge camera

>>4135624
ok, good luck in shooting decent photos 10 years from now without ever understanding the exposure triangle

It mattered a lot more when cameras were kind of shit or you were shooting color film, especially slides

These days every camera over $500 has enough dynamic range and enough bit depth in its raws to spot meter for the brightest thing you don't want to be solid white, press the AEL button or fiddle with your settings to make that very light gray, and keep your camera there until the light changes

>>4135591
>For my understanding any falsely set metering mode could still be changed in post, but please correct me if I'm wrong
Only to a limited extent. Anything dramatically overexposed or underexposed will be lost. RAW files offer more room for exposure correction. JPG files are pretty limited there. Exposure is different from white-balance, for which it practically doesn't matter in RAW whether it's set in-camera or in post-processing.

You probably got triggered by one of my other posts where I've mentioned Evaluative, Matrix, Average and so on for a balanced metering, but also spot metering to measure for highlights or shadows.
Metering plays an important role for me, which is why I change it often, as well as the exposure modes, also because I have a very broad spectrum in photography. I'd like it if all manufacturers (e.g. Canon) had zebras and highlight metering, I found it repeatedly useful with Sony.

>>4135591
I never change metering modes, if metering is off, I just adjust exposure comp.

>>4135591
I rarely change metering modes. I'll use evaluative most of the time, occasionally spot metering, or I'll bypass both and just shoot manual and use the histogram to judge exposure.

Reading >>4135602 I should probably add to >>4135604 why metering is important to me.
I try to shoot in proper exposure for capturing (high quality, no clipping, little noise, no lost color information) but also constant exposure for a series of images so that batch editing allows me to edit many images in one go, with only a few images needing individual corrections. I often even set the white balance, shoot in constant exposure but varying depth of field. I try to shoot manually and correct with metering from time to time, but if the lighting conditions change too much and too quickly, I try to meter my exposure from fixed points, then often with spot metering. The Canon metering modes in the OP image are pretty much sorted, starting from the right with very manual metering but ease to achieve a uniform exposure, to the left, very variable and automatic metering but larger deviations in the exposure.

>>4131525
I can bring my own cutie, just gotta make her develop some tan lines and work at a beach-side snack stand and/or learn to fish from jetties

File: Screenshot 2023-01-30 at (...).png (36 KB, 802x252)

36 KB PNG

>>4129061
You should get the 18-55mm and just take that and maybe the 35mm. Keep it simple.

File: B5E4388D-F7D9-4B3D-A046-A(...).jpg (109 KB, 575x620)

109 KB JPG

>>4129061
Seek help or ngmi
https://youtu.be/WslSHcTKk4E
https://youtu.be/cyeDYcH3I4I
https://youtu.be/lyjJ99ipXqw

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	575
Image Height	620
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: travelkit.jpg (220 KB, 800x636)

220 KB JPG

OM2n with 50mm 1.8 and 28mm 3.5. Cheap trip MD3 as backup. All fits in a small bag along with film and a few spare batteries. No expensive or rare kit that I would be upset about if it got stolen or damaged while travelling.

File: IMG_5666.jpg (1.58 MB, 3024x4032)

1.58 MB JPG

last trip, those old VC rolls were shot iso 80 since they were old (but still freezer stored before expiring) for a gig.
also that point and shoot has been replaced with a fujifilm klasse.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand