[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
06/20/16New 4chan Banner Contest with a chance to win a 4chan Pass! See the contest page for details.
[Hide] [Show All]


All work safe boards are now on the 4channel.org domain. Make sure to update your script blockers and whitelist the new domain.

There's now a setting option under Navigation to display the full list of boards on 4channel.org

The 4chan Vtuber Competition is over. Click here to see the winning entry!


[Catalog] [Archive]

File: 1187770908945.jpg (61 KB, 1000x508)
61 KB
61 KB JPG
Go /p/ro:
• Please post images that are JPG format, smaller than 1 MB, and/or about 1000 pixels on the longest side.
• Expect to be judged harshly. Learn to deal with it.

Want:
• We come here for photos, so post yours as often as possible, even if "image unrelated" to your text.
• "Flickr/500px/Tumblr/Facebook/Portfolio" threads are for critique and networking
• Use "Recent Photos" threads if you are shy or only want to post a couple of photos.
• Shared raw files which we can collectively edit for discussion of post-processing techniques, are encouraged.
• Use the catalog to consolidate similar topics (photographic themes, images or technical gear threads)

Do Not Want:
• Go to >>>/r/ for specific Photoshop requests.
• Gear threads are discouraged, but identified as necessary. Many users simply hide these threads.


Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

File: dslr-picatinny-rail-mount.jpg (1.25 MB, 3264x2448)
1.25 MB
1.25 MB JPG
This is the thread where we discuss everything related to gear

Previous thread(s)
>>3390375
>>3395071
3 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3405448
You can get a cheap new D750 right now (plus battery grip) for 1400 dollars now. It's a better camera that the D610. I had a D600 (which is the same as a D600) for 6 years and the autofocus in the D750 is way better. Next gen D760 will most likely be like 2K (like the D750 was when it first came out). It's the best of times to get a new body. A new body would surely last you more than 5 years, a second hand one may die next month, don't take risks with that.
>>
>>3405544
>a second hand one may die next month
A new camera has a much higher rate of failure in the next year of ownership than used bodies.
>>
>>3405544
$1400 vs $700 or in my case $800 vs $100 as total expenses.
I'm not too familiar with the board culture of /p/ but I have feeling that what you're saying is bait, feel free to prove me wrong on that though.
see, if I were to spend that much money on something new I would buy a refurb d810 instead but I really don't allow myself to spend that much on camera gear and I've been dealing with second hand goods for a long time now without any failures, yet.
>>
I'm looking to buy a used fuji x100s or ricoh gr II since I can't be arsed to carry my dslr around with me everywhere. Can get them for between 450-600e used, any recommendation on which to get?
>>
I just bought one of these, should be here tomorrow

File: Lensball_lights_800x.jpg (90 KB, 756x756)
90 KB
90 KB JPG
Anyone else hate this trend? I don't understand what this is supposed to be. Like to me it is a tool used as an excuse to put 80% bokeh in an image or too appear 'deep' with some mirror ball
>>
idk senpai, this trend seems to be pretty dead since like 2 years. I think you're a bit late with the hate

File: This_cheating_cunt..png (19 KB, 1024x1024)
19 KB
19 KB PNG
Is there a way to see the timestamp on a picture sent through facebook messenger? I caught my gf in a lie and knowing the date of the picture is the only way I can confirm she's cheating on me.
40 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3405584
>lived with her for 2 years
what are you like 20 years old?
>>
>>3405650
24
>>
I have the picture opened in C++. Can anyone tell me how to find the timestamp now that it's pulled up in C++? I think i'm about to pass out for the night.
>>
>>3405657
What exactly is the picture of?
>>
>>3405660
>We live separate right now so that's hard to do. One story that doesn't add up is that we play an online game together. I got back from work early and asked her what she was doing. I was already logged in playing this game and she told me she was online playing too. I said something like "oh cool, hows the cat doing?" because she always sends me a picture of the cat next to her monitor. I think she sent me a picture she took before. She didn't get online until a little earlier than the time I usually get home settled down. I'm fairly certain she just logged in on mobile. We talked back and forth for awhile and she had to go. I tried to track her exp to see if she was in privacy mode and it wouldn't let me.

This comment goes into depth about the picture but it's of her computer monitor.

http://www.olegkikin.com/shutterlife/

>Search your gear
>Post results
>rate/hate/masturbate
>Consider selling ageing gear to unsuspecting zoomers/photoglets

Discuss
8 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3403911
It's more fun if one doesn't.
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
>>
File: nikon_d800_shutter_life.png (45 KB, 1220x500)
45 KB
45 KB PNG
>>3403854
Not very encouraging. Also the website said the average clicks after which the shutter dies is 135k, but the average clicks after which it's still alive is 180k. So which one is it, OBAMA?
>>
>>3405623
So it's likely to last 135k but the likelyhood drops before the next evaluation step after 180k.
>>
>>3403854
None of my bodies are listed, but both are doing fine, despite one beeing exactly 50 years old and having a dent in the one piece die-cast frame.
If the shutter ever goes bad it can be readjusted and works fine again.
>>
they only have the old Bentax models, nothing even as recent as the K-30. my K-50's at about 35k and despite a few dead pickles it's going strong

File: FujiG617.jpg (686 KB, 1000x1000)
686 KB
686 KB JPG
wide boi edition

Old thread: >>3397030
All film photography related questions and general discussion on film photography is to take place in this thread.
35mm, 120, large format, developing, scanning, labs, etc.
Feel free to post photos, we want to see that beautiful grainy goodness!

>posting in /fgt/ doesn't make you gay, you use the panorama crop mode on your P&S

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution1000 dpi
Vertical Resolution1000 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
260 replies and 68 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3405568
It was cropped and rotated too.
>>
>>3404549
This one is sold as the Pacific Image 120 in the states and I've got the exact same question. Can't really find the Plustek 120 anywhere so I guess this is the next best option for an accessible dedicated MF scanner. It seems decent at least according to this site https://www.filmscanner.info/en/ReflectaMF5000.html
>>
>>3405619
what lens and film?
>>
now that the dust has settled and everyone's bored of digital photos, instagram/facebook, etc i'm thinking about picking up one of these for fun/novelty/nostalgia. people either never knew or barely remember the charming activity of snapping polaroids and being able to hand them out of keepsakes to your friends. might be kind of fun and I feel like I'll enjoy the simplicity of shedding post-production and the endless snapshitting that digital tography enables. not for any serious photos, just parties and holidays and whatnot.

what is /p/'s opinion? useful activity or waste of money? will i get bored with it in a week or will it expand my enjoyment of photography?
>>
File: Slobruthers231.jpg (175 KB, 1200x800)
175 KB
175 KB JPG
>>3404554
>are $100+ pns cams a meme
What do you think, fuckface?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 550D
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.8.14
Firmware VersionFirmware Version 1.0.8
Serial Number1132529712
Lens NameEF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution350 dpi
Vertical Resolution350 dpi
Image Created2016:09:06 07:32:06
Exposure Time1/125 sec
F-Numberf/8.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/8.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length100.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1200
Image Height800
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Exposure ModeManual
Focus TypeAuto
Metering ModePartial
SharpnessUnknown
SaturationNormal
ContrastNormal
Shooting ModeManual
Image SizeUnknown
Focus ModeOne-Shot
Drive ModeTimed
Flash ModeOff
Compression SettingFine
Self-Timer Length10 sec
Macro ModeNormal
White BalanceDaylight
Exposure Compensation3
Sensor ISO Speed160
Color Matrix129

File: Untitled.png (22 KB, 496x426)
22 KB
22 KB PNG
Anyone with a flickr account, who keeps track of stats, ever see anything like this?

For some reason I'm bothered by this... exactly 500 views on the stream would be one thing... but split up into exactly 100 views on each of 5 pages is intentional. Something is up here and I don't know what.

Could it just be flickr testing its stats tracking?
>>
>still using flickr in 2018

get with the times grandpa

Serious question. Are they even making any money? What you reckon, how long do they have?
243 replies and 30 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3405518

The mount is not irrelevant, dumbass. That's why L-mount Alliance exists and why Sigma joined it.
>>
>>3405521
It's absolutely irrelevan't.

There is nothing the other 4000/6000 dollar cameras can do to help Sigma.
>>
>>3405525

Do you really think the L-mount alliance is only ever going to produce top end camera bodies? Seriously man, you must have the IQ of a fucking gnat.
>>
>>3405548
Well... The bodies are rather mediocre, but they do demand ludicrous pricing.
Leica will sooner die than drop their price tag.
Panasonic isn't going to price their FF body near their m4/3 stuff.

L-mount is doomed to be low volume, and Sigma will most likely lose money on it. But they are good at recouping the costs elsewhere.
>>
>>3405552

>Multi-billion dollar corporations are worse at business strategy than me. I can't even believe how smart I am. They should hire me.

You're that fatass retarded faggot from YouTube, aren't you. The one that sucks at photography and talks like he knows everything. The bald fat retard, can't remember your name, some dumbass name that sounds pseudo religious. I'm certain you're him.

File: s-l1000.jpg (21 KB, 336x501)
21 KB
21 KB JPG
Looking for bestest biggest quality of this image please, thankyou.
1 reply omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3405268
The one you have with you
>>
based necroposter
>>
File: MT37459Lg.jpg (712 KB, 1638x2440)
712 KB
712 KB JPG
>>3405268
you in luck

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2018:12:12 15:26:17
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1638
Image Height2440
>>
>>3405598
You’re a faggot.
>>
File: s-l96.jpg (2 KB, 64x96)
2 KB
2 KB JPG
>>3405613
bethetht mode

Does this thing still do anything on modern sensors, or is dynamic range good enough that it has no effect anymore?
65 replies and 5 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3404434
that might be why, it's a full frame sensor with good iso performance and dynamic range, i think the whole point about shots looking worse when they are recovered from being underexposed is more applicable to crop or m43 cameras with worse dr/noise performance
>>
>>3404775
Yeah that's definitely a good point. It does have good noise performance, but it is also a 4 or 5 year old camera, so it's not the newest thing out right now either

What I would also like to point out to the guy flipping out about skin tones as well is that this isn't necessary for everything. I do mostly landscape photos, so it works well for me. If you're doing studio portraits, then clearly, ettr isn't applicable
>>
>>3400137
Yep, expose to the left makes far more sense.
Why anyone would ETTR makes zero sense to me.
>>
>>3405602

More photons, dumb dumb.
>>
>>3400048
From the wiki on the ETTR:
"As of 2015, the better of the recent photographic imaging sensors of the 35 mm "full-frame" format can accommodate up to about 14 stops of engineering DR or 11.5 stops of useful photographic dynamic range in the raw shooting mode."

I'd say it's still useful as for easier processing in postproduction, but I don't think it matters anymore unless you're shooting in very sharp light or so. So I suppose you should expose for your subject and fix the rest in postprodduction unless you're directly aiming for intentional overexposure like blown highlights or underexposure for silhouettes etc.

That being said for modern fullframe, not sure about aps - c, though...

File: 1506465995526.jpg (6 KB, 225x225)
6 KB
6 KB JPG
>looking up review for a lens
>all sample images are of a fucking wall or some object on the reviewer's desk because he was too autistic to go outside or to get a model
if you're not showing me what a lens can do in a landscape, street, or portraiture setting (the 3 things 90% of photographers primarily shoot) your review is fucking worthless
there's a reason Kai is the most popular YouTube photographer despite being a relatively lousy technical reviewer - he shows how equipment performs in the actual environments you'd use the equipment in
2 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3405210
>mfw Christopher Frost answered my comment and my follow up question succinctly and clearly
>>
>>3405219
>he's funny
No he isn't, he's a pratt
>>
>>3405220
It's also easier to cheat an make the brand you shill for look better than the others
>>
>>3405223
The Priest is THE source for lens reviews.
>>
>>3405414
You don't spell choirboy with an L

Does /p/ want to see my shitty cellphone tree climbing photos?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeApple
Camera ModeliPhone SE
Camera Software11.2.2
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)29 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2018:05:05 16:07:19
Exposure Time1/382 sec
F-Numberf/2.2
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating25
Lens Aperturef/2.2
Brightness8.3 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeSpot
FlashNo Flash, Auto
Focal Length4.15 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1080
Image Height1440
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
9 replies and 9 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
The highest perch in the city

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeApple
Camera ModeliPhone SE
Camera Software11.2.2
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)29 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2018:12:08 15:53:02
Exposure Time1/120 sec
F-Numberf/2.2
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating32
Lens Aperturef/2.2
Brightness6.1 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length4.15 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1080
Image Height810
RenderingUnknown
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
Ok that’s all the halfway decent ones. Got more on some film I haven’t developed yet, might post those later on if I think of it

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeApple
Camera ModeliPhone SE
Camera Software11.2.2
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)29 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2018:10:24 01:25:41
Exposure Time1/15 sec
F-Numberf/2.2
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating2000
Lens Aperturef/2.2
Brightness-6.8 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeSpot
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length4.15 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1080
Image Height1440
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>3405455
betula pendula
>>3405471
>>3405473
fagus sylvanica
>>
File: IMG0017B.jpg (50 KB, 640x480)
50 KB
50 KB JPG
Hola saludos de Perú

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareMicrosoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2017:02:27 15:02:59
>>
>>3405455
Heights make me nervous.

File: iu-2.jpg (39 KB, 474x562)
39 KB
39 KB JPG
It is time.
Send your photos in to:
- 4cpbook19@gmail.com

No theme. Photos will be curated, don't bitch about it, we'd like to maintain the decent quality like previous years. Chances are though your snapshits will be included because the lack of photographers left on this board.

Photo requirements:
• longest side 2000px
• Max. 2 photos
That's it.

Just send your photos in with your preferred handle and an optional quote.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
52 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3405541
I haven't enjoyed the pdf for at least 5 years. all the good guys quit.
>>
>>3405559
You are not all people
>>
>>3404633
>• longest side 2000px

So you're printing a 6x4 book?
>>
>>3405573
I never said all people had good taste
>>
>>3405635
no one was talking about good taste, you’re just proving you can’t keep track of an argument. I wish you and isi and moop were locked in a room together, it’s be the best drama movie ever.

File: wolf slut (1 of 1).jpg (480 KB, 864x1080)
480 KB
480 KB JPG
Someone with a digital camera
>"Can I take your photo"
>"Fuck off creep"
An individual with a film camera
>"would you pose for a photo for me?"
>"Oh my god yes, can I take my clothes off first?"
18 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3405495
>DIGI KEK
>>
>>3405495
thank god for based chosis and alex burke. without them /p/ would be devoid of skill
>>
>>3405495
Can you fuck off you pedophile?
>>
File: chosis spinner.jpg (50 KB, 484x462)
50 KB
50 KB JPG
>>3405495
guess we know what you landed on today
>>
File: 1542193972453.jpg (27 KB, 720x833)
27 KB
27 KB JPG
>>3405393
this is the right answer. use it as an opening

File: 810_6834-1600.jpg (443 KB, 1600x1455)
443 KB
443 KB JPG
So I got pic related recently for my birthday, it was my grandfather's. I already shoot 35mm film but the scanner I used doesn't scan 120. What's the best scanner I can get for less then or around 300$, I wanna get the benefits of a larger negative but I'm a jobless university student

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
8 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
Nikon 8000 for $1000-15000
It is the same as the 9000 and about $2000 cheaper, only the 8000 transport mechanism is a little flakier

>>3405245
>Epson V600
shitbeds are absolute shit
>>3405379
best option if you already have a camera, just get a macro and a cheap LED light table.
Will do 95% of a dedicated neg scanner
>>
>>3405515
epson v600 resolves just fine for phones and computer displays
>>
>>3405515
I bought a new V600 for less than $300 CAD and it does just fine, pic related.

I'd have to shoot a looot of film before I'd consider dropping $1k+ on a scanner. For a few rolls a month I don't see anything to complain about with my results as is.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.14 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2018:09:20 21:14:31
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
File: _0016204.jpg (300 KB, 900x1200)
300 KB
300 KB JPG
>>3405595
looks like a nice scan
but When I had a V700 I couldn't get a scan that printed worth shit, they looked great on the screen but that was it. I switched to a Coolscan and get great prints despite having to use an ancient OS and software.

this might be a topic for another thread
but have others found major differences in scanning for screen vs print? Hardware as well as software and film stocks.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeRICOH
Camera ModelGXR S10
Camera SoftwareGXR Firmware
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.4
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationLeft-Hand, Bottom
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2018:03:15 10:41:36
White Point Chromaticity0.3
Exposure Time1/80 sec
F-Numberf/3.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating800
Lens Aperturef/3.0
Brightness-3.3 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length7.80 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width3648
Image Height2736
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
>>
>>3405565
does ok for prints, but the v600 is better suited for medium format (with a proper film holder)

still shits all over 90% of lab scans i've seen


Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.