>>3634627
Got a few tips for ya:
Dress down (wear cheap clothing with no logos, also keep your camera in a basic bag), do not point your camera in the face of some druggie (if you insist on taking their picture ask them or use a zoom), try not to walk around super impoverished areas with a $3000+ camera system try using one of you beater cams, 90% of the time these dudes will not bother you if you stay out of their way ,Stay safe

File: ezgif.com-video-to-gif.gif (1.08 MB, 320x180)

1.08 MB GIF

>>3634627
I normally carry a bersa thunder 380 but I'm out of the states and gunlaws are bitch out here so I keep this in my pocket it also doubles as a knuckle duster

>Ib4 edgy fag

>>3634627

Dude once told me you should wear your tripod in your hand so you can club someone with it. He once did, and smoked a fag together later. Lesson; tripod could come in hand, charm might get you even further

>tldr; how to defend yourself and your gear in a south american favela

>>3637582

I generally like wearing an inconspicuous camera bag. No camera logos on it. Also running shoes. Also looking like half a hobo yourself might help. When i wear my camera on my body I sling it across my chest and then covered under the flap of a jacket. Also nice for off the hip shooting

>>3637143
>krav maga
>you cannot defend yourself
Are you a jew?

>>3637744
it's called soul, you wouldn't understand

>>3637744
it's called not knowing how to color correct, you digicucks wouldn't get it

File: C82DCD5F-A00A-4B6D-AEE7-1(...).jpg (2.68 MB, 4032x3024)

2.68 MB JPG

From the notes of W Eugene Smith from the book Darkroom by Lustrum Press (Pic related) I found this method of developing 2 rolls per reel of 35mm. Granted it works on the steel reels but I have yet to try it on say Paterson plastics, doubt it will work. I tried it with already ruined rolls a couple times to make sure I could do it in light then I dove in to do it for reals with 2 rolls of Fomapan and it was a success!

Given the rule of 6ml of developer per 80^2 inches of emulsion (1x 35mm-36exp or 1x120) you would need minimum a 1:25 dilution for this to work safely or just use stock solutions, like I did.

Negatives in next post

File: D784B363-8057-4C8C-BAFA-B(...).jpg (2.76 MB, 4032x3024)

2.76 MB JPG

The only issue is that one can’t remove just one strip at a time so make sure you got your clips ready

Does anyone use eos film cameras
How do people react to you compared to using a traditional manual camera

File: 1586397978680_centered.jpg (1.2 MB, 859x1074)

1.2 MB JPG

>>3637727
i like this more if the road is centered

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	GR
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2020:04:08 20:10:47
Exposure Time	20 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Brightness	-6.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	18.30 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	859
Image Height	1074
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal

File: 2031B334-3B4F-4D59-83B7-7(...).jpg (220 KB, 2048x1365)

220 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7500
Camera Software	NIKON D7500 Ver.1.10
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	868
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	147 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2020:04:08 21:16:27
Exposure Time	1/800 sec
F-Number	f/4.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/4.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	98.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3637766
>sharp wildlife photo

File: RIV02760.jpg (898 KB, 1113x2000)

898 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7RM4
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 9.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	600 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2020:04:08 19:59:11
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	500
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Brightness	6.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Other
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	400.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: buff-1005 (1).jpg (3.41 MB, 2500x1667)

3.41 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 6D Mark II
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)
Photographer	ROBERT EMHOF
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2020:04:08 19:47:05
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	250
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	33.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3637661
Because RAWs take a while to open up and use a lot of RAM. if you took hundreds of pics and are trying to cull them down to a more managable amount, JPGs let you do it a lot quicker.

>>3637639
darktable, rawtherapee, capture one

>>3637678
>darktable and rawtherapee
I've tried these and i just found them to be worse experiences than lightroom. That was a while ago though
>capture one
Even more expensive than lightroom

There is Luminar, which during the trial i liked a good amount. $90 or whatever the price was was reasonable as well. The AI editing was interesting as well. I havent switched because there still doesnt seem to be anything good for the ipad. I could just use lightroom on the ipad, and only pay $5 a month instead of $15 though, but a good reason to use lightroom is for the consistent editing experience across devices and the syncing of images. My real issue is the lack of good applications for the ipad

How much floor space do you need to shoot portraits with softboxes and similar large lights? I want to shoot indoor portraits so I can control all the lighting, add props, etc, but I don't have hardly any room to do that

>>3637775

Not a lot of space if you're shooting 50mm or wider. Anything over that (85/105/135, etc) then yeah you're gonna need space between you and the model even more if it's full body

>>3637094
Yes unless you’re using b&w film or monochrome sensor, you can select any colour combination for b&w conversion from a colour photo.

>>3637394
It's not the same. You can get much better results with a red filter vs digital manipulation

>>3637398
Bruh, it’s already got a red filter on it.

>>3637398
If you can't edit an image it is more easy, yes. Any filter can be recreated with even more depth in post, provided you can do it

File: 1161s.jpg (266 KB, 1200x900)

266 KB JPG

>>3637422
So how would you recreate like 760mn IR pass filter?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon PowerShot A800
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.12
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.00
Lens Size	6.60 - 21.60 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	180 dpi
Vertical Resolution	180 dpi
Image Created	2020:04:09 08:23:56
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	12.05 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3648
Image Height	2736
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Image Number	110-0816
Exposure Mode	Program
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Evaluative
Sharpness	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Large
Focus Mode	Single
Drive Mode	Single
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Fine
Macro Mode	Normal
Subject Distance	4.250 m
White Balance	Custom
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	160

Assuming that's film, have a photo lab scan it at highest quality possible before it turns to dust.

Go outside when sunset, but also overcast and rain
Take photo of tall thing near plant

>>3637474
>wait until 8PM
>set ISO to 64,000
>aperture to f/16
>shutter speed 1/250
>take photo
>import into Lightroom
>crop to like 1/10th of original size
>noise reduction 200, sharpness -100
>saturation to zero

File: B54FAF9D-2DAA-4FBD-BB2A-5(...).jpg (230 KB, 1280x962)

230 KB JPG

>>3636603
here you go op

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1280
Image Height	962

>>3636790
no

>>3636612
k

>>3636850
no; above two fail because you cant see its a finger

>>3637134
ding ding we have a winrar, though i would keep the original cropping

>>3637184
It’s a different photo though but thanks for the insight!

File: B1AA35D3-2B02-4A85-8DBE-D(...).jpg (912 KB, 2581x1964)

912 KB JPG

Here’s the final photo

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone 8
Camera Software	PicsArt
Photographer	esteban--94
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	32 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2020:04:07 04:28:91
Exposure Time	1/30 sec
F-Number	f/2.2
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	500
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Brightness	0.3 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	2.87 mm
Comment	{"subsource":"done_button","uid":"533692B8-A2D7-4951-92D5-B9934694AA54_1586298429094","source":"other","origin":"gallery","source_sid":"533692B8-A2D7-4951-92D5-B9934694AA54_1586298429103"}
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2581
Image Height	1964
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3636603
I'd start by taking a more interesting photo with a more interesting background. Come on who dude who wants to see ceiling panels??
I like the basic concept but consider your elements more.

If you want to learn you need to take experiment or look at tutorials. It seems like you're just asking for someone to edit your photo for you..

File: 773b607c4eb1333fa6ccb8a50(...).jpg (135 KB, 1920x1080)

135 KB JPG

>>3637646
The secrets are Photoshop, marketing, and connections.

Nothing, except maybe get a full frame sooner. Also, don't buy that telephoto lens from craigslist, it was broken. That's pretty minor though as it was cheap. The journey is part of the fun.

shoot medium format sooner

>>3637694
lmao tons of shooters with very minimal photoshopping lurk more. current trends are for very minimal retouching...

>>3636098
Yeah I think there's a LOT of people who browse 4chan who are so hopelessly weeb that they can't ever see past their asian fetish to see if someones really attractive or not. You appear to be one of them.

>>3637750
I'm not really a fan of portraits, though, but it was a lot of what I did starting out.

also dude did you pay money to go to college to freelance cause wtf

>>3637756
I'm in college for math. I didn't pay anything because it was on the GI bill

>>3637757
ok phew

For what it's worth I think your pics are good.

Can you only put your 3 best on the front page? You got too many there I think.

File: $T2eC16h,!)IFIeJCrztiBSYP(...).jpg (49 KB, 600x450)

49 KB JPG

>>3626953

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FQyluthfR4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IA282wVgAV4

>>3637364
>spread legs?
Not really my style.

>>3637537
faggot??

>>3637540
yeah, this!!!

>>3637537
any butthole to feet pix?

File: DSC_0071-4.jpg (2.06 MB, 2048x971)

2.06 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3300
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.10.1 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	820
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	39 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2020:04:07 02:24:31
Exposure Time	1/400 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	26.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: IMG_2631.jpg (4.67 MB, 3888x2592)

4.67 MB JPG

still a beginner with a very old camera

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTi
Lens Size	18.00 - 55.00 mm
Firmware Version	Firmware 1.0.4
Owner Name	unknown
Serial Number	0720302875
Lens Name	EF-S18-55mm f/3.5-5.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2019:05:05 14:13:32
Exposure Time	1/320 sec
F-Number	f/9.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Lens Aperture	f/9.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3888
Image Height	2592
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Mode	Manual
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Evaluative
Sharpness	Unknown
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Large
Focus Mode	Manual
Drive Mode	Continuous
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Fine
Macro Mode	Normal
Subject Distance	5.460 m
White Balance	Cloudy
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	288
Camera Actuations	-1130102672
Color Matrix	129

File: IMG_5991.jpg (4.97 MB, 5184x3456)

4.97 MB JPG

one of the first photo I ever took

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS REBEL T3i
Lens Size	75.00 - 300.00 mm
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.0.2
Lens Name	EF75-300mm f/4-5.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:11:26 16:54:28
Exposure Time	1/400 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	75.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5184
Image Height	3456
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Mode	Manual
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Center-Weighted
Sharpness	Unknown
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Large
Focus Mode	Manual
Drive Mode	Continuous
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Fine
Macro Mode	Normal
White Balance	Cloudy
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	256
Color Matrix	129

File: DSC_0114[1].jpg (576 KB, 1879x1479)

576 KB JPG

I've been at this for about 2 weeks pls no bully

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi

File: D9AF985D-F7FF-4AAC-AEF0-F(...).jpg (307 KB, 1280x855)

307 KB JPG

>> 3629481

Favorite recent. I have so many good ones, although this thread is putting my photography to shame.

Also Im fairly new to 4chan, so no bully pls

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1280
Image Height	855

I'm a recent convert from point and shooting on hikes with a cell phone camera that's main lens is about equivalent to a 32mm lens to a Sony a7r ii. I've been going back and forth between the Sony 16-35mm f4 and the Tamron 17-28mm f2.8. It is my understanding that the Tamron has an image quality that is closer to the superior Sony 16-35mm f2.8 at around the same cost as a used Sony 16-35mm f4. Is it possible to change my point and shooting technique to make up for the defecit 7mm at the top end of the Tamron? My goal is point and shooting my way up the mountain until I get to the top and then using a tripod for long exposures with the 16/17mm portion of the lens. I imagine the difference between f2.8 and f4 is minimal since I'll be at f11-16 anyway and f2.8 is only useful for astrology photography and indoors.

TL;DR: Is versatility more important that image quality when it comes to lens?

>>3637737
If you aren't willing to buy used, a Sony a6300 with a 18-135mm lens goes for $1,050.

>>3637745
>TL;DR: Is versatility more important that image quality when it comes to lens?

Yes and no, typically in controlled environments you'd want the absolute best image quality. But when you don't have control over the environment having flexibility becomes more important, so you have to sacrifice something to gain that flexibility. If you're just doing point and shooting up a mountain I doubt that extra 7mm is gonna mean much. Plus if you're gonna be doing wide long exposures I'd easily want a lens that's sharper edge to edge.

>>3637693
>>3637705
That's exactly what I wanted it for, wildlife related stuff. I'm surrounded by lakes and trails.

File: B9782666-7079-4A40-945E-2(...).jpg (307 KB, 1280x1022)

307 KB JPG

>>3637755
Take my advice with a grain of salt, because I’m new and probably wrong about everything, but I use that lens a lot for birds and whatnot. I don’t think you’d be disappointed

Pic related, ignore my shit composition

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1280
Image Height	1022

>>3637560
Thank you brother! Any ideas as to how I'll know if lenses fit my camera? (Its a silly question)

>>3637706
read the manual for your camera and don't try to shove a canon lens in it?

>>3637706
All F-Mount lenses will fit.
For primes, only G lenses will autofocus. D lenses require a body focus motor, which DX nikons lack (except for the D50, and a few others)

As others have stated, just getting out and shooting literally anything interesting. That's how I started, and it was one of my favorite "stages" of my photography journey. Good luck!

>>3637434
Best tip I have for you. Don’t be a gearfag, don’t listen to gearfags and only buy good glass, an off camera flash and a nice wrist or next strap for the next year (assuming you’re shooting more than 3 times a week, if less it’s two years) if you MUST purchase anything.

is there a video editor with a color correction / grading similar to davinci resolve but less resource intensive?

>>3637311
no

>>3637311
There are ways to make Dvinci less resource intensive - working with proxy footage and dropping your resolution down whilst you work on the project and then exporting it at higher res later on and other tricks.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlU8JTtH7uk

Davinci, being free and robust is my choice for my videos - I don't know any other programs that do it as good - i've used premiere and vegas. Both workflows just dont resonate with me like resolve does.

Does anyone know of a good colour accurate monitor for 400-500 EUR?

>>3637425
though not, but worth an ask, no?

>>3637426
thanks, I love davinci but it crawls at even the most basic chopping tasks. I tried a couple other less intensive video editors in the time that I asked, shotclip is probably the most impressive with what it has versus how it runs, but the color grading / and correction is extremely lacking.