>>3405448
You can get a cheap new D750 right now (plus battery grip) for 1400 dollars now. It's a better camera that the D610. I had a D600 (which is the same as a D600) for 6 years and the autofocus in the D750 is way better. Next gen D760 will most likely be like 2K (like the D750 was when it first came out). It's the best of times to get a new body. A new body would surely last you more than 5 years, a second hand one may die next month, don't take risks with that.

>>3405544
>a second hand one may die next month
A new camera has a much higher rate of failure in the next year of ownership than used bodies.

>>3405544
$1400 vs $700 or in my case $800 vs $100 as total expenses.
I'm not too familiar with the board culture of /p/ but I have feeling that what you're saying is bait, feel free to prove me wrong on that though.
see, if I were to spend that much money on something new I would buy a refurb d810 instead but I really don't allow myself to spend that much on camera gear and I've been dealing with second hand goods for a long time now without any failures, yet.

I'm looking to buy a used fuji x100s or ricoh gr II since I can't be arsed to carry my dslr around with me everywhere. Can get them for between 450-600e used, any recommendation on which to get?

File: Pauleth-Ip-The-Phoblograp(...).jpg (55 KB, 770x514)

55 KB JPG

I just bought one of these, should be here tomorrow

idk senpai, this trend seems to be pretty dead since like 2 years. I think you're a bit late with the hate

>>3405584
>lived with her for 2 years
what are you like 20 years old?

>>3405650
24

I have the picture opened in C++. Can anyone tell me how to find the timestamp now that it's pulled up in C++? I think i'm about to pass out for the night.

>>3405657
What exactly is the picture of?

>>3405660
>We live separate right now so that's hard to do. One story that doesn't add up is that we play an online game together. I got back from work early and asked her what she was doing. I was already logged in playing this game and she told me she was online playing too. I said something like "oh cool, hows the cat doing?" because she always sends me a picture of the cat next to her monitor. I think she sent me a picture she took before. She didn't get online until a little earlier than the time I usually get home settled down. I'm fairly certain she just logged in on mobile. We talked back and forth for awhile and she had to go. I tried to track her exp to see if she was in privacy mode and it wouldn't let me.

This comment goes into depth about the picture but it's of her computer monitor.

>>3403911
It's more fun if one doesn't.
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

File: nikon_d800_shutter_life.png (45 KB, 1220x500)

45 KB PNG

>>3403854
Not very encouraging. Also the website said the average clicks after which the shutter dies is 135k, but the average clicks after which it's still alive is 180k. So which one is it, OBAMA?

>>3405623
So it's likely to last 135k but the likelyhood drops before the next evaluation step after 180k.

>>3403854
None of my bodies are listed, but both are doing fine, despite one beeing exactly 50 years old and having a dent in the one piece die-cast frame.
If the shutter ever goes bad it can be readjusted and works fine again.

they only have the old Bentax models, nothing even as recent as the K-30. my K-50's at about 35k and despite a few dead pickles it's going strong

>>3405568
It was cropped and rotated too.

>>3404549
This one is sold as the Pacific Image 120 in the states and I've got the exact same question. Can't really find the Plustek 120 anywhere so I guess this is the next best option for an accessible dedicated MF scanner. It seems decent at least according to this site https://www.filmscanner.info/en/ReflectaMF5000.html

>>3405619
what lens and film?

File: fujifilm_instax_wide_300_(...).jpg (119 KB, 1600x900)

119 KB JPG

now that the dust has settled and everyone's bored of digital photos, instagram/facebook, etc i'm thinking about picking up one of these for fun/novelty/nostalgia. people either never knew or barely remember the charming activity of snapping polaroids and being able to hand them out of keepsakes to your friends. might be kind of fun and I feel like I'll enjoy the simplicity of shedding post-production and the endless snapshitting that digital tography enables. not for any serious photos, just parties and holidays and whatnot.

what is /p/'s opinion? useful activity or waste of money? will i get bored with it in a week or will it expand my enjoyment of photography?

File: Slobruthers231.jpg (175 KB, 1200x800)

175 KB JPG

>>3404554
>are $100+ pns cams a meme
What do you think, fuckface?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 550D
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.0.8
Serial Number	1132529712
Lens Name	EF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:06 07:32:06
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1200
Image Height	800
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Mode	Manual
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Partial
Sharpness	Unknown
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Unknown
Focus Mode	One-Shot
Drive Mode	Timed
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Fine
Self-Timer Length	10 sec
Macro Mode	Normal
White Balance	Daylight
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	160
Color Matrix	129

>still using flickr in 2018

get with the times grandpa

>>3405518

The mount is not irrelevant, dumbass. That's why L-mount Alliance exists and why Sigma joined it.

>>3405521
It's absolutely irrelevan't.

There is nothing the other 4000/6000 dollar cameras can do to help Sigma.

>>3405525

Do you really think the L-mount alliance is only ever going to produce top end camera bodies? Seriously man, you must have the IQ of a fucking gnat.

>>3405548
Well... The bodies are rather mediocre, but they do demand ludicrous pricing.
Leica will sooner die than drop their price tag.
Panasonic isn't going to price their FF body near their m4/3 stuff.

L-mount is doomed to be low volume, and Sigma will most likely lose money on it. But they are good at recouping the costs elsewhere.

>>3405552

>Multi-billion dollar corporations are worse at business strategy than me. I can't even believe how smart I am. They should hire me.

You're that fatass retarded faggot from YouTube, aren't you. The one that sucks at photography and talks like he knows everything. The bald fat retard, can't remember your name, some dumbass name that sounds pseudo religious. I'm certain you're him.

>>3405268
The one you have with you

based necroposter

File: MT37459Lg.jpg (712 KB, 1638x2440)

712 KB JPG

>>3405268
you in luck

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2018:12:12 15:26:17
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1638
Image Height	2440

>>3405598
You’re a faggot.

File: s-l96.jpg (2 KB, 64x96)

2 KB JPG

>>3405613
bethetht mode

>>3404434
that might be why, it's a full frame sensor with good iso performance and dynamic range, i think the whole point about shots looking worse when they are recovered from being underexposed is more applicable to crop or m43 cameras with worse dr/noise performance

>>3404775
Yeah that's definitely a good point. It does have good noise performance, but it is also a 4 or 5 year old camera, so it's not the newest thing out right now either

What I would also like to point out to the guy flipping out about skin tones as well is that this isn't necessary for everything. I do mostly landscape photos, so it works well for me. If you're doing studio portraits, then clearly, ettr isn't applicable

>>3400137
Yep, expose to the left makes far more sense.
Why anyone would ETTR makes zero sense to me.

>>3405602

More photons, dumb dumb.

>>3400048
From the wiki on the ETTR:
"As of 2015, the better of the recent photographic imaging sensors of the 35 mm "full-frame" format can accommodate up to about 14 stops of engineering DR or 11.5 stops of useful photographic dynamic range in the raw shooting mode."

I'd say it's still useful as for easier processing in postproduction, but I don't think it matters anymore unless you're shooting in very sharp light or so. So I suppose you should expose for your subject and fix the rest in postprodduction unless you're directly aiming for intentional overexposure like blown highlights or underexposure for silhouettes etc.

That being said for modern fullframe, not sure about aps - c, though...

>>3405210
>mfw Christopher Frost answered my comment and my follow up question succinctly and clearly

>>3405219
>he's funny
No he isn't, he's a pratt

>>3405220
It's also easier to cheat an make the brand you shill for look better than the others

>>3405223
The Priest is THE source for lens reviews.

>>3405414
You don't spell choirboy with an L

File: B7387740-6E98-4055-8241-0(...).jpg (282 KB, 1080x810)

282 KB JPG

The highest perch in the city

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone SE
Camera Software	11.2.2
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	29 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2018:12:08 15:53:02
Exposure Time	1/120 sec
F-Number	f/2.2
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	32
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Brightness	6.1 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	4.15 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1080
Image Height	810
Rendering	Unknown
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: 2595D6B6-04ED-4AFB-BAEE-4(...).jpg (228 KB, 1080x1440)

228 KB JPG

Ok that’s all the halfway decent ones. Got more on some film I haven’t developed yet, might post those later on if I think of it

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone SE
Camera Software	11.2.2
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	29 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2018:10:24 01:25:41
Exposure Time	1/15 sec
F-Number	f/2.2
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	2000
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Brightness	-6.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	4.15 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1080
Image Height	1440
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3405455
betula pendula
>>3405471
>>3405473
fagus sylvanica

File: IMG0017B.jpg (50 KB, 640x480)

50 KB JPG

Hola saludos de Perú

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2017:02:27 15:02:59

>>3405455
Heights make me nervous.

>>3405541
I haven't enjoyed the pdf for at least 5 years. all the good guys quit.

>>3405559
You are not all people

>>3404633
>• longest side 2000px

So you're printing a 6x4 book?

>>3405573
I never said all people had good taste

>>3405635
no one was talking about good taste, you’re just proving you can’t keep track of an argument. I wish you and isi and moop were locked in a room together, it’s be the best drama movie ever.

>>3405495
>DIGI KEK

>>3405495
thank god for based chosis and alex burke. without them /p/ would be devoid of skill

>>3405495
Can you fuck off you pedophile?

File: chosis spinner.jpg (50 KB, 484x462)

50 KB JPG

>>3405495
guess we know what you landed on today

File: 1542193972453.jpg (27 KB, 720x833)

27 KB JPG

>>3405393
this is the right answer. use it as an opening

Nikon 8000 for $1000-15000
It is the same as the 9000 and about $2000 cheaper, only the 8000 transport mechanism is a little flakier

>>3405245
>Epson V600
shitbeds are absolute shit
>>3405379
best option if you already have a camera, just get a macro and a cheap LED light table.
Will do 95% of a dedicated neg scanner

>>3405515
epson v600 resolves just fine for phones and computer displays

File: 20180921-09-2018-Ektar-003.jpg (751 KB, 1200x1194)

751 KB JPG

>>3405515
I bought a new V600 for less than $300 CAD and it does just fine, pic related.

I'd have to shoot a looot of film before I'd consider dropping $1k+ on a scanner. For a few rolls a month I don't see anything to complain about with my results as is.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.14 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2018:09:20 21:14:31
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: _0016204.jpg (300 KB, 900x1200)

300 KB JPG

>>3405595
looks like a nice scan
but When I had a V700 I couldn't get a scan that printed worth shit, they looked great on the screen but that was it. I switched to a Coolscan and get great prints despite having to use an ancient OS and software.

this might be a topic for another thread
but have others found major differences in scanning for screen vs print? Hardware as well as software and film stocks.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH
Camera Model	GXR S10
Camera Software	GXR Firmware
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.4
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Left-Hand, Bottom
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2018:03:15 10:41:36
White Point Chromaticity	0.3
Exposure Time	1/80 sec
F-Number	f/3.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/3.0
Brightness	-3.3 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	7.80 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	3648
Image Height	2736
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal

>>3405565
does ok for prints, but the v600 is better suited for medium format (with a proper film holder)

still shits all over 90% of lab scans i've seen