Could Ukraine make use of the Aero Ektar?
>>4126399God I love having "mogs" filtered
>>4127185>God I love having "mogs" filtered>still finds and comments on "mogs" postswhat did the autist mean by this?
>>4127535He posted a screenshot of his whole list here:>>4126572
>>4127563so its a filter for him to be identified when those posts occur so he can read them and reply to them?>clown world
>>4125832No they would instantly lose the war and become belarus 2.0
post your pictures of bokeh. because bokeh is the most important part of photography[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D5100Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 11.0 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern720Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2023:01:20 19:41:19Exposure Time1/15 secExposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating1000Exposure Bias-2 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4129220
i feel like something important is happening here. as silly as this is, i used to love playing around and doing things like this. i haven't considered taking pictures of blurry nonsense in a long time. what have i been doing? life has become so complicated. i love this thread. thanks, op.
>>4129332at the very least they make awesome desktop backgrounds
traffic from an overpass
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot SX220 HSMaximum Lens Aperturef/5.9Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaLens Size5.00 - 70.00 mmFirmware VersionFirmware Version 1.01Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution180 dpiVertical Resolution180 dpiImage Created2023:01:05 18:36:35Exposure Time1/25 secF-Numberf/5.9Lens Aperturef/5.9Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length70.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4000Image Height2248RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeISO Speed RatingAutoSharpnessNormalSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeFull AutoImage SizeLargeFocus ModeSingleDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingFineMacro ModeNormalSubject Distance1.510 mWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed160Image Number193-2487
you're out for your daily stroll,snapping away,when all of a sudden you come across this scenewhat do?>choose wisely------------------------------>A] totally ignore and run away to go spam your shite snaps on this dead board>B] immediately capture `behind the scenes` photographs to $lang to TR~heads as outtakes >C] open Uncle's door, get on the floor, everybody walk out with the cock out[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (13.0 20120305.m.415 2012/03/05:21:00:00) (Macintosh)Image-Specific Properties:Image Width2500Image Height1500Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Pixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2012:04:05 00:03:51Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1000Image Height600
>>4124989>links to an image on an imageboardAre you actually a retard?
>>4127967terryjew poster fag is slowly but surely succumbing of drug induced brain rot. it's sad rally, you shouldn't pick on him.
>>4127967mostly spam on faceberg so i'm not really sure how to upload webp files on here, sorry
>>4124078I highly doubt that this was a 600mm lens. For me, this was a standard lens.
>>4130121I correct myself, wide-angle to standard
Why does cinefag insist that Terry "makes" instead of "takes" pictures and that somehow makes him an artist? I think he's just coping. What's "made" about this pos? It's just Woody Allen against a white background lit with flash, any DMV could do that.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2012:02:13 21:06:25Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1709Image Height2550
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2012:02:13 21:22:37Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1732Image Height2539
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2012:02:13 21:03:52Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1695Image Height2540
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2012:02:13 21:21:29Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1686Image Height2541
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2012:02:13 20:56:49Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1747Image Height2542
when photographing penises, what is the best technique to capture the "money shot" under 7 minutes?
Hipster bullshit pornography pretending to be art. The Jackson Pollock of photography./officialendthread
Uncle TERRY is the Weegee Tichy of flash art \m/his style will be hip for eternity and his unique techniques can never be replicated.stay asssore, me2Qtards.........
>>4127453>pornography pretending to be artplz give us a QRD on how https://licensing.artpartner.com/CS.aspx?VP3=DamView&VBID=2UY15FD8VNWR&PN=1&WS=SearchResults&FR_=1&W=1600&H=827is "pornography">?
>>4096921not homo but I want to suck that dick
>>4129535how would you fit it all down your esophagus?
What would you advice a newbie who wants to take his image-making to the next level and only has an entry-level camera with kit lens? Buying studio time maybe? Reading some books on visual design? Everybody knows gear doesn't matter insofar it doesn't get in the way.
>>4121444orgied with her and her sis
>>4113635I see 3 males in that picture
>>4126320top kek
>>4126320i thought terry was tranny...that is what Qtards and me2fags were saying?
>>4113052dang bro chill and just ask your boss for a raise!
Besides the overhyped and underperforming Fuji meme, which brand has the best editing tools after you take a picture?Back in the day I tried Nikon's system and was impressed but Canon lacked the functionality at all. With Nikon you could even do gimmicks like selective color or diorama effect. I don't remember if Olympus lets you play with filters after the pic is taken but they did have plenty of effects to apply when taking it.
>>4124000sony has the advantage of applying filters on every photo you take, the beautiful sony color science will render your skins green and shadows purple
>>4126615Ok, thanx for that info.
>>4126615You got it backwards. That's the pentax K-1 mk II. EVERYONE gets green skin, and all the shadows are purple, no exceptions, no way to change it. Baked in to the raw.Sony picture profiles are pretty powerful and from the A7IV onwards you can apply a LUT in camera. The greens in skin tones on default settings are just because that's a color that is naturally in caucasian skin. You're pale, the greenish-bluish hues of your veins show through and there's a slight yellow relfection at all times. Your mind filters little details like this out but the camera is honest. Just bring the green/cyan down and bring red and magenta up in color depth, and then move blue and color phase around to correct the shadows.
>>4124523>Option for removing chromatic aberrationWhy wouldn't you want to remove it?
>>4127738>at's the pentax K-1 mk II. EVERYONE gets green skin, and all the shadows are purple, no exceptions, no way to change it. Baked in to the raw.>Sony picture profiles are pretty powerful and from the A7IV onwards you can apply a LUT in camera. The greens in skin tones on default settings are just because that's a color that is naturally in caucasian skin. You're pale, the greenish-bluish hues of your veins show through and there's a slight yellow relfection at all times. Your mind filters little details like this out but the camera is honest. Just bring the green/cyan down and bring red and magenta up in color depth, and then move blue and color phase around to correct the shadows.Yea but it's too small, you end up drooping it all the time.
Now that the new S5 has came out. Im expecting the first model S5 to turn out more in the used market. At what price range should i expect the prices to go down to in the upcoming days. Id really like to have one for a cheaper price. Idc about autofocus
>>4130079Just wait for the recession and WW3 to start, then you will get great prices
it was already a great value so dont hold your breath on a big price drop chief
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.72.004 (171201)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1565Image Height1037
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.72.004 (171201)Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKIImage-Specific Properties:Image Width1471Image Height975Image Created2023:01:26 08:48:43Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Height1037Image Width1565Color Space InformationsRGB
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.72.004 (171201)Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKIImage-Specific Properties:Image Width1517Image Height1005Image Created2023:01:26 08:47:16Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Height1037Image Width1565Color Space InformationsRGB
>>4130048im late but bw better prices dont feel as bad
Just got my first "WHAT ARE YOU SHOOTING, BRO? WHY ARE YOU SHOOTING ME, HUH? DELETE THE PHOTO!" experience.
>>4129672photographing in dan francisco is bullshit
>>4129610This is such a stupid take/rule lmfao>>4129672Pretty shit attitude tbqh[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>4127554Nothing particularly offensive but when I took pics of female friends they insisted on>no candid shots>they have to look at the pics first. If they deemed the pics as being too unbecoming of their beauty they usually demanded a reshoot with better pose, angle, sunlight, the position if celestial body in the sky etc.Also taking their pics are usually a chore. I don't mind taking f&f pics but when I have to take the 50th pic of roughly the same subjects and pose juat so they could get their insta shot for free it gets tiring
>>4129935is that goerge michal
>>4129967Women literally take 50 selfies every time they decide to take one. If it wasn't for women we'd still be shooting film and using no-camera phones.
please tell me your favs and the ones you hateenjoy[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 12.1 (Macintosh)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2023:01:18 20:54:43Color Space InformationsRGB
>>4127145Fine then. I dont argue here on artist integrity.I like you photos, you seem to already be doing a good job, so im gonna shut the fuck up and mind my own bussines.Have fun man, post more when you have.
> write long ass message> accidentally click browse on mobile > come back to web, message is goneFuck you web dev>>4127153Hahaha thank you man, I will. I think we have a very different view on what is individuality but I didn't mean to be aggressive really, just asked a really precise question to know what made you react so bad to what I said. I never had a constructive philosophy debate on this board so I leave it to you to reflect about the impact of other on your work, and if aknowledging this impact means you're less yourself, or less free.>>4127152Thank you for the feedback. I am surprised people actually like this streetlamp photo cause it felt snapshity at first but now I look at it it also has nice texture.Nice photo, indeed it has the same elements, although mine is more dreamy and yours more modern ?Probably goes to show this general concept of having a green plant under a ray of light with a warm white background is kinda overdone, but oh well.
Bump for more feedback before I let it die
>>4128100no >: )
>>4129735dude I thought someone cared about my pics but it was your shitpost >:(
I have recently bought this piece of shit adapter to use on my z5, but I came across some issues which. I'm unsure whether my unit is not working properly or if it's intentional. I'd love to hear from someone using it regularly. Keep in mind that I do not own any 6-bit coded lenses.I cannot set the proper focal length for any of my M-Hexanons (28, 50, 35 & 90). Other lenses/LTM-M adapters work fine. It defaults to some lenses with wrong focal lengths and max apertures and no way to change that. As I don't need the 6-bit reader, and it's recessed, I just taped over it with electrical tape. This solves the issue, and lets me choose the correct focal length using the dial.They advertise that aperture data can be saved to the EXIF if I set the correct aperture value in camera (meaning the same as I set the lens to). The issue is, that the camera only lets me set values between f/0.95 and f/5.6. Is it supposed to work like that? That seems like such an arbitrary value. Therefore, both the max aperture and the set aperture are wrong in the EXIF. With a "dumb" adapter, I at least can set the max aperture of the lens and that gets saved correctly.I love the front/back focus indicator and focus trapping, but I'm quite disappointed by the inability to set the correct aperture value, or at least only the correct max aperture instead of having 2 wrong values in the EXIF. Is mine just faulty, or can anyone confirm those issues?
So you bought something without knowing if or how it works. Brilliant.
>>4128080What?Both of my issues relate to the adapter doing things it explicitly should not do according to ttartisan & the manual.There is a ring to set the focal length for uncoded lenses, but any readable 6-bit code overwrites the setting. That's how it works. It shouldn't, however, read 6-bit codes if there is no code on the lens—which it does with a select few lenses blocking the necessary manual setting. Furthermore, the adapter is designed to let you set the aperture in your camera to the same value you manually set the lens to get a correct EXIF entry. That's a feature they advertise with. However, if the adapter limits the camera to apertures smaller than 8, that means the feature is not working as advertised. Now, this might all be because my unit is faulty or because those are well-known issues. For example, the older M-Sony adapter also has issues with misidentifying (uncoded) lenses.
>>4128093>It shouldn't, however, read 6-bit codes if there is no code on the lensIt's reading garbage data through the metal mount
>>4128041>Someone using the TArtisan M-Z 6BitI have one around mi penis right now. AMA.
>>4128041Does an adapter influence the image in any way?If you don't care about auto-focus, is getting a cheap shitty knock-off adapter a reasonable idea? What's the catch?Like, OP having issues wiht focal length settings
i'm looking for some good music recommendations that will inspire while i'm in the streets working or in a studio shooting a session...what tunes get you pumped to start snapping away?i'd love if you could post some [either single tracks or whole albums] mp3/youtube/bandcamp links so i can try out some your taste to see if it can get the creative juices flowing.here are a few sounds i enjoy blasting while photographing:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qiWTELbneMchttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3iSJTDExtAhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JUAkWk4bbQhttps://youtu.be/_Fm3qDZeWTshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYEr-7nSIxsComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4125349you think she was paid to endorse the band?
>>4125347>and THE SAVAGE YOUNG TATERBUG - GASOLINE WEIRDO.those last 2021 tapes:https://www.discogs.com/master/2221633https://www.discogs.com/release/19664314were quite stellar, wish he would come back to making more solid sounds >;(
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TzaRmBN9J4https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_xifMZQMe4https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0S2cQYKD6Swhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7JTZtOr_x4https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lydxw_ad6qAhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gY_cJYnHd7M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTofGxYDscEhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yb7HgANhWOghttps://susanlawly.bandcamp.com/track/publichttps://susanlawly.bandcamp.com/track/privatehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RO7mX3p8ypYhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kk6RCrrznV4https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GglYtHJhBhYhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wFXrPRJCwbsComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4113578https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOc_0KwoRw8https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVzJ2GJTCeIhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ucXX9vTxTXYhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0t4Va7uLkccaptcha: R4ASMR
LOL>Leica shooters on suicide watchIs there any photography company that makes quality cameras anymore? Are we screwed by the modern consumerist lifestyle that demands new shiny things every quarter so who cares if the old one breaks in the meantime?
>>4129952keep coping and saving up your money for one
>>4129957why would i waste money on old trash that (You) don't even have?
>>4129957leicaless larper lmao
>>4129959>its old trash but im going to keep replying and seething that i cant get to see a camera ill never owni think you care just a bit too much
>>4129963leicaless larper lmao
Bought a Fuji xt30 yesterday. Couple of pics from it.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-T30Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2023:01:18 22:41:17Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/3.2Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating3200Lens Aperturef/3.2Brightness-2.8 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length18.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
I like your photos, OP.
>>4126317honestly op i liked almost every one of these photos. very cool.
post some more please
Lacking somewhat technically but very high interest value. Tell us more about the places.
>>4127064magum opus when?
