[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Crypto payment is now available for self-serve ad campaigns


[Advertise on 4chan]

[Catalog] [Archive]

How do photographers get razor sharp focus like this? In the dark? Even in daytime, back to back kinetic photos I’ll get mad unfocused ones

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
CommentScreenshot
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1170
Image Height2532
Scene Capture TypeStandard
13 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: 1685639380043.jpg (80 KB, 1800x1202)
80 KB
80 KB JPG
This >>4185168 and using equipment that isn't shit (and KNOWING your equipment). If I don't fuck up in an obvious way, it's not hard to get right, unless it's extremely dark like picrel. And even then the focus is ok, just on the wrong eye.
The hard part on shooting in low light isn't sharp focus, it's shooting subjects that move faster than ~1/50 can freeze. In which case you just have to use flash or crank up the iso very high.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D750
Camera SoftwareVer.1.15
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern664
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Exposure Time1/60 sec
F-Numberf/1.8
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating4000
Exposure Bias-3.5 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width6016
Image Height4016
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlHigh Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
this thread proves that barely anyone here actually knows about how photography works
>>
>>4185158
f/8+ and flash
/thread
>>
>>4185196
>not knowing technologically is a word
>not knowing how f8 works
>posting his opinion

yikes
>>
>>4185183
>no come back so turns to grammar naziism to feel superior
lol imagine caring about grammar in a place like this lol

Looking at getting a canon 10-18 stm or 10-22 usm but I'm not sure which one to get for my 7D. Which would you guys recommend?
6 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4184646
neither
get a high quality manual focus prime instead
do it or waste money on a zoom now, inevitably regret it and buy later the prime you should have bought now
>why would i do this?
*because a high quality prime will btfo any zoom
*you can step back if your need to go wider and step forward if you need to go narrower
*you'll also be able to go wider and crop down if needed with a prime as clarity and sharpness of a prime will surpass any equivalent zoom
>>
>>4185217
This retard must not realize how much difference there is between 10 and 20mm.

Sugma 10-20 is a thing. No idea if it’s better, but know that it’s an option. I have one and it’s alright.
>>
>>4184646
Both are good. 10-18 has a plastic lens mount, but is also lighter and smaller. I've owned the 10-18 and it was really handy. All the last generation EF-S "STM" lenses are excellent, IMO. That said, I can't vouch for durability. I only used them a short period of time before switching to full frame.

>>4184779
>the grinding of the DC micro motor.
I used to own one of these lenses and it focused silently.
>>
>>4185240
>Sugma 10-20 is a thing
The f3.5? It's not good
>>
10-18 hands down no contest

honorable mention to the Tokina 11-16 which is also gud

File: helpwtf.jpg (115 KB, 733x486)
115 KB
115 KB JPG
>livingineurope.png
why the fuck do americans get tech so fucking cheap?????
>canon R5
>US = $3,400
>EU = €4,800
>sony a7iv
>US = $2,299
>EU = €2,999
you guys can literally buy R5 for basically the same price that i can buy a fucking a7iv for... how the fuck is that fair????? and why??? US and Australia should literally have higher prices considering the fuck that your ENTIRE FUCKING CONTINENTS are separated from the rest of the world but instead, its the other way around, US gets shit for way cheaper for whatever the fuck reason???? hello????
42 replies and 4 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4184620
Overall tax burden is very similar to the rest of the developed world. They just vastly overspend on police, military and feed the beast economics to mask them giving billions in handouts to the rich and powerful.

More than 3 times the expenditure per capita on military than the UK. And higher total military spending than the next 10 biggest spending countries combined. The incarceration rate is more than 5 times higher than the UK, yet the homicide rate is more than quadruple; because punishment doesn't reduce crime, higher spending on social welfare does.

But if the us government decided to spend money on helping it's people to reduce crime, it's "big government" socialism and evil, if it spends money on punishing them and increasing crime, it's a "necessary minimumx, patriotic and good.

They really are the biggest fucking dumbasses in the world, far worse than nearly all of Africa or the middle east, and the worst bits of the USA are just as bad as the worst bits of the above.
>>
>>4184834
True, like affirmative action
https://news.uark.edu/articles/8880/affirmative-action-may-reduce-crime-more-than-racial-profiling-researchers-find

Whereas the police beatings of George Floyd were associated with an increase in crime https://academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/article/1/5/pgac189/6695312

Which shows that persecution in its current form not only has an immediate effect on the micro scale, with those affected by the imprisonment of a family, friend or gang member more likely to commit crime either to support themselves following the loss of an income stream, or in retaliation against their acquaintances incarceration. But also on the macro scale, with Americans angry at the status quo.

But if you want to pay more taxes so you can fulfill your persecution fetish, then you do you, but also check yourself for lead poisoning.

Oh and before you go all "UrBaN ArEaS", rural areas have higher rates of homicide, suicide, drug death, violent and gun crime. Because believe it or not, more poor & desperate people live where it's cheaper than in city centres.
>>
>>4184818
Yes and because or that economics is not real for us. We are one of two countries who can, at any time, say that money is not real and never was.

Also look at those stats closer - which people? Even adjusted for socioeconomic status, trailer trash need to be removed from the gene pool. If we cut more welfare they’ll do it to themselves.
>>
>>4185558
Could you not?
>>
>>4185243
>Giving people undeserved handouts possibly at the cost of taking opportunities away from people that actually earned it will solve crime
>Punishing criminals will not
>Why? Because if you arrest the criminals their friends will be mad and commit more crime.
You more or less just said that there is an ongoing race war. There is only one solution to this, and it involves the permanent repeal of the first amendment and the institution of a race-agnostic eugenics program.

File: p purse.jpg (389 KB, 1000x1006)
389 KB
389 KB JPG
What do you own, what do you recommend?

Why are photo backpacks so expensive and are they worth it?

Any good budget bags? It seems a bit weird spending $400 for a backpack and then reading reviews saying that they get ripped after a year of moderate use.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created2012-12-10T11:33:33-05:00
FlashNo Flash Function
Image Width1000
Image Height1006
105 replies and 24 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4175830
The actual reality is that you have a mountain of grapes on floor that say made in china, but the peak of the mountain reaches the height of the made in italy grapes, still in thr branch, "therefore they must be equal"
>>
File: 4009900517720.jpg (74 KB, 1000x1000)
74 KB
74 KB JPG
>>4183475
They come in "jars" in EU

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
>>
File: PXL_20230601_051434537.jpg (1.59 MB, 3648x2736)
1.59 MB
1.59 MB JPG
>>4184802
RX100 II

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeGoogle
Camera ModelPixel 7
Camera SoftwareHDR+ 1.0.529100733zd
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.2
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)21 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width3648
Image Height2736
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2023:05:31 22:14:34
Exposure Time66667/1000000 sec
F-Numberf/2.2
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating667
Lens Aperturef/2.2
Brightness-1.6 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Subject DistanceInfinity
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length2.74 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3648
Image Height2736
RenderingCustom
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Digital Zoom Ratio1.4
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeDistant View
>>
>>4178249
WHHIIIIIPPPPSNAKKKEE
>>
>>4167349
I run with a peli 1510 style case for backup and very infrequent equipment

Thinktank retrospective 30 v2 as my main grab bag, it's pretty decent, can cram all of my stuff in there just about, but it's mainly to have at events for me to quickly change a lens or grab some flashes

I may be getting the PD 10L sling bag as a kinda EDC travel bag for my important stuff

And a PD 45L travel backpack for "one" bag travel etc.

Had to hike a little for a session last month, did my shoulder in carrying a shoulder bag full of my stuff. Just wish I had a proper backpack at the time.

File: 8Q5A4662.jpg (399 KB, 720x1080)
399 KB
399 KB JPG
>sunny day
>plenty of free time
>expecting 4h of good light
>"today it's happening"
>camera has batteries, gear is ready
>"traffic is not ideal..."
>"can't find decent clothes for doing this"
>"not enough hours of sunlight..."
>and other very reasonable and useless excuses to not go
>stayed home

...again.
I managed to go out two times last year, none this year.

Bros... it's over, isn't it?

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
7 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4181871
Fou you yes
I have bewn in my 4 walls for over 10 years without friends or going out to meet people only playing vidya. I bought a camera in the hopes of forcing myself out. It worked have gone out hiking over 5 times in the last 2 weeks with every route being about 15 - 20 km.
Got some good pictures, but honestly hiking is fucking boring, srill teying to find so'ething cool to do.
>>
>>4182817
>this. have a panasonic g7 + 100-400mm leica and it's very light in comparison with apsc and ff
>>
>>4183001
>macro
>>
>>4182859
You have been inside for 10 years, then went out for a hike and did 20km? That is actually quite a bit more than I would have expected. As for hiking being boring, either find something to do outside (maybe some bushcrafty stuff, learning plant species) or alternatively listen to podcasts (which I always think takes a lot away from being outside, but might still be something for you)
>>
>>4181871
It's easy to find reasons not to do something. Just make yourself go. I find that I usually have a better state of mind once I'm out

File: 000098790030.jpg (3.72 MB, 3130x2075)
3.72 MB
3.72 MB JPG
just got in to film photography because my bf is obsessed with photos. criticisms welcome pls tear my photos apart like confetti

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKI
Camera ModelEZ Controller
Camera SoftwareEZ Controller 8.10.008 (221031)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2023:05:13 15:55:22
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3130
Image Height2075
17 replies and 7 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4179340
Agree with >>4179350 only really nice one I see
>>
>>4179340
>/17/23(Wed)20:57:56 No.4179337▶>>4185399
>File: 00009519002

I like this one, but I also don't like people.

Good shot.
>>
>>4179342
Samefag >>4185399 and >>4185400
This one is also well done. I am a little biased because B&W has been my escapade lately for a project, but the cityscape tells a story, message. Bustling city, something to SHOW and therefore tell
>>
>>4179331
They're all boring and a waste of film. Buy a digital camera and learn the basics, then shoot film if you'd like once you learn more.
>>
>>4179331
Look for subjects. All these photos are pretty empty.
it works for >>4179340 because the lines are interesting but the others don't really say anything.

File: DSC_6440.jpg (489 KB, 1600x1059)
489 KB
489 KB JPG
How do I get my photos from snapshits to art? Is it really all in VSCO presets like everyone else uses?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D7000
Camera SoftwareAdobe Bridge 2020 (Windows)
PhotographerAJM
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)300 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created2023:05:30 23:48:19
Exposure Time1/250 sec
F-Numberf/8.0
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/8.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length200.00 mm
Image Width1600
Image Height1059
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
1 reply omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4184679
yes
>>
>>4184806
ok
>>
>>4184681
Are you a Slav?
>>
>>4184679
composition, light, color and of course, subject
>>
>>4184838
Yes ;_;

>>4185405
All wrong

File: Image7.jpg (509 KB, 1920x1080)
509 KB
509 KB JPG
Anyone interested on working a zine together? I have one that works well, if anyone wants to join or just submit some work. Let me know !
29 replies and 6 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4172390
You may WhatsApp me at 9927043148
>>
>>4172271
I dont know wtf a zine is but I'm bored and have nothing to do currently. How do we get in touch? Email? Or just post pics here in thread?
>>
>>4183383
https://discord.gg/g6tCHPkf8T
here , send me a message on discord
>>
>>4172390
https://discord.gg/g6tCHPkf8T
here https://t.me/+ghv6LUv_W4Q2ZDAx
>>
File: 1683888569700082.jpg (6 KB, 240x240)
6 KB
6 KB JPG
Extended submission for 10 days

I hate to admit it but for years I've been just applying goofy film pre-sets and playing with sliders until I get something that I think looks good (on my uncalibrated gaming monitor).

I want to finally start to edit with a clear purpose but I don't know how to start.

The tutorials I could find either focus on making dramatic looking landscape photographs or studio photography. I'm more interested in the kind of editing art and reportage photographers do.
9 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4182434
I also do this, edit the raws. leave them for a few years. edit again when I realized my previous edit was meh. but sometimes, there are instances that my edits from years ago were better than the new ones. and usually when editing, I'm always in the quest for finding the sweet spot which alludes me.
>>
>>4181099
Damn anon, that might fix society too.
>>
>>4181892
it's the same as it was in the darkroom, just much easier to repeat the desired result. my photoshop files look like those print notes, but those words are now translated into a couple curves layers with masks.
>>
Start thinking in terms of an exposure curve instead of sliders. You’ll also just be fucking around with it for a while, but it will help you understand what you’re doing more in the long run
>>
>>4181099
I hope next year we get /p/ and /pol/ crossover on April fools

old thread:
>>4126166

This thread seemed so popular, probably the only thread on /p/ that has EVER hit bump limit which is saying something, I don't like that other racist Nikon thread so lets keep this wholesome one going.

If f/1 is too wide for you this 50mm f/2 is quite handsome and compact in comparison.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width831
Image Height637
140 replies and 20 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4185187
I'll bust out the manual
>>
>>4185185
shoot some test shots in the lighting conditions you think you'll be in and see if you're ok with the amount of noise that you'll get at f5.6.
If you're not ok with that you can get a 70-200 (300mm equivalent) f2.8 from either Sigma or Tamron used but that's going to be a few hundred dollars probably much less than buying a new system though.
>>
>>4185185
It works like this: If a DX lens is f4.5, you have the same noise performance and DOF as a full frame user who is shooting at (4.5*1.5=) f6.7 and doubling their ISO to keep the shutter speed roughly the same as yours. In real life most likely slightly worse because noise is affected by sensor technology as well and pro cameras normally get slightly better sensors. Comparing really good new nikon (sony) sensors to really old nikon DX sensors, the full frame guy could have a cleaner image until doubling his ISO twice with the perfect match happening maybe a half stop below that.

IRL people with larger sensors just shoot at the larger apertures because bokeh is cool anyways.
>>
>>4143896
kek. sister, why are you even here?
>>
>>4185185
There's a lot of confusion regarding equivalence. You don't have to multiply anything except you're trying to figure equivalents between systems. A FX or a DX 300mm are 300mm lenses no matter what sensor is behind them, but a 300mm on a DX camera will give you the same field of view as a 450mm on an FX camera would. People sometimes say DX cameras have 1.5x magnification, this is wrong. 1.5x is the crop factor. Magnification aka extra reach a camera gives is camera 1 pixel pitch divided by camera 2 pixel pitch. e.g. 3.89/3 for D3300/GH6. Result is 1.297x aka you get 29.7% more reach.

File: DSC04775-1.jpg (233 KB, 1500x942)
233 KB
233 KB JPG
Have you done any diy modification on camera gear, /p/?

I found this old helios-44 I shortened in order to get less vignetting for anamorphic projector lenses.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-7SM3
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 24.5 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)94 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2023:06:01 12:43:05
Exposure Time1/250 sec
F-Numberf/8.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating4000
Lens Aperturef/8.0
Brightness3.9 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeAverage
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length94.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1500
Image Height942
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: 20230601_1324351.jpg (73 KB, 1210x908)
73 KB
73 KB JPG
Aside from 3d Printing adapters for weird as fuck mounts like Adaptall2 to Samsung NX or M42 polarizer to lens hood mount so i can remove it fast

I do the casey neistat tape on the screen mod, so you can pull the screen quickly

I extended the lens hood to add contrast of the helios44-4M by adding some chinese wide adapter to the front and removing the glass

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationRight-Hand, Top
>>
>>4185270
Oh, that's a neat little trick, the tape on the screen, I'll give it a go.

File: 1662860523701783.png (1.15 MB, 1280x720)
1.15 MB
1.15 MB PNG
Is it me or did this guy turn into a zombie ever since he started his own photography channel? Or is it just the lazy editing?
>>
>>4184665
Its been almost 15 years nigger, he's married with a kid now.
>>
>>4184665
Fuck.
He has got more energy than me after so long
>>
>>4184751
>married with a kid
sheesh, how has he not been canceled?
>>
Only does adds for hipster shiet
>>
>>4184665
it's probably HIV

Film prices are absolutely insane

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1360
Image Height1338
Scene Capture TypeStandard
80 replies and 13 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4180253
Fridge. In the butter box.
>>
File: 1669535695449267.png (1.6 MB, 1105x976)
1.6 MB
1.6 MB PNG
>>4181233
Damn. Not even anon and that was good asf.
>>
>>4181236
You can buy a great 24mp FF camera for that price.
>but but muh film tones
Learn to edit chud
>>
>>4181236
>Film is pay as you go and way cheaper than buying such a digital camera.
not in the long run. You can get a good body for $1000. That's only a couple thousand images in film. You're also not accounting for the price of developing film and the possibility of something going wrong in that time
>>
>>4185166
>couple thousand images

A couple thousand more than the trips here.

File: IMG_2051.jpg (315 KB, 1436x1077)
315 KB
315 KB JPG
Ebay has gone to shit, where else can i offload vintage gear and make enough profit to feed my lens addiction.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareGoogle
Image-Specific Properties:
22 replies and 3 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4184976
Kek
>>
>>4185080
I didn't take any and I'm not gonna drive there to take them. just think of the usual shit, it's that
>>
File: LCSO.jpg (2.52 MB, 2448x3264)
2.52 MB
2.52 MB JPG
>>4185089
>I didn't take any and I'm not gonna drive there to take them.
Nophoto

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera ModelFZ-N1
Equipment MakePANASONIC
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.4
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created2021:11:01 13:36:42
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Time (UTC)17:36:42
Date (UTC)2021:11:01
Color Space InformationsRGB
F-Numberf/2.4
Focal Length2.97 mm
Lens Aperturef/2.3
Exposure ModeAuto
Image Height3264
RenderingNormal
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Exposure Index365
SharpnessNormal
White BalanceAuto
Image Width2448
Metering ModePattern
Gain ControlUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Auto
ContrastNormal
Exposure Bias0 EV
ISO Speed Rating1600
Exposure Time1/24 sec
>>
>>4185091
I hate those fags so much. Same shit in all western countries. If it is a police chief you can be certain its a freemason pig.
>>
>>4185091
why would I waste film on
>gay flag
>black person flag
>gay black flags

File: IMG_1139.jpg (1.08 MB, 2784x1856)
1.08 MB
1.08 MB JPG
Can you anons tell me why I would need a tilt-shift lens if I can just edit the picture to look like it directly in camera?
My only use for a tilt-shift lens would be for miniaturization of towns and cities.

P.S pls rate pic and tell me how to improve it.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 90D
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2023:05:17 14:56:01
Exposure Time1/400 sec
F-Numberf/8.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating160
Lens Aperturef/8.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length135.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width6960
Image Height4640
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
22 replies and 3 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4183708
exactly.
but you would be decieved if you never handled a tilt shift?
Because I like hiking and taking these shots. Not sure if I should invest in a lens.
>>
>>4183778
It doesn't even look that much like a miniature, it looks like you blurred half the image. As soon as someone posts a real image from their cheap chinese tilt shift the gig is up. It's like using fake bokeh, people will pick up on the subtleties like the cutout effect.
>>
>>4183782
>As soon as someone posts a real image from their cheap chinese tilt shift the gig is up
Yeah, I'm sure someone will post it in year or two., just keep the thread up for so long.
>>
>>4183281
Is it possible to get the miniature effect without blur ?
>>
>>4185014
think about why you perceive a scene as miniature


[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.