How do photographers get razor sharp focus like this? In the dark? Even in daytime, back to back kinetic photos I’ll get mad unfocused ones[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiCommentScreenshotColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1170Image Height2532Scene Capture TypeStandard
This >>4185168 and using equipment that isn't shit (and KNOWING your equipment). If I don't fuck up in an obvious way, it's not hard to get right, unless it's extremely dark like picrel. And even then the focus is ok, just on the wrong eye.The hard part on shooting in low light isn't sharp focus, it's shooting subjects that move faster than ~1/50 can freeze. In which case you just have to use flash or crank up the iso very high.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D750Camera SoftwareVer.1.15Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern664Focal Length (35mm Equiv)50 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiExposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating4000Exposure Bias-3.5 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width6016Image Height4016RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
this thread proves that barely anyone here actually knows about how photography works
>>4185158f/8+ and flash/thread
>>4185196>not knowing technologically is a word>not knowing how f8 works>posting his opinionyikes
>>4185183>no come back so turns to grammar naziism to feel superiorlol imagine caring about grammar in a place like this lol
Looking at getting a canon 10-18 stm or 10-22 usm but I'm not sure which one to get for my 7D. Which would you guys recommend?
>>4184646neitherget a high quality manual focus prime insteaddo it or waste money on a zoom now, inevitably regret it and buy later the prime you should have bought now>why would i do this?*because a high quality prime will btfo any zoom*you can step back if your need to go wider and step forward if you need to go narrower*you'll also be able to go wider and crop down if needed with a prime as clarity and sharpness of a prime will surpass any equivalent zoom
>>4185217This retard must not realize how much difference there is between 10 and 20mm.Sugma 10-20 is a thing. No idea if it’s better, but know that it’s an option. I have one and it’s alright.
>>4184646Both are good. 10-18 has a plastic lens mount, but is also lighter and smaller. I've owned the 10-18 and it was really handy. All the last generation EF-S "STM" lenses are excellent, IMO. That said, I can't vouch for durability. I only used them a short period of time before switching to full frame.>>4184779>the grinding of the DC micro motor.I used to own one of these lenses and it focused silently.
>>4185240>Sugma 10-20 is a thingThe f3.5? It's not good
10-18 hands down no contesthonorable mention to the Tokina 11-16 which is also gud
>livingineurope.pngwhy the fuck do americans get tech so fucking cheap?????>canon R5>US = $3,400>EU = €4,800>sony a7iv>US = $2,299>EU = €2,999you guys can literally buy R5 for basically the same price that i can buy a fucking a7iv for... how the fuck is that fair????? and why??? US and Australia should literally have higher prices considering the fuck that your ENTIRE FUCKING CONTINENTS are separated from the rest of the world but instead, its the other way around, US gets shit for way cheaper for whatever the fuck reason???? hello????
>>4184620Overall tax burden is very similar to the rest of the developed world. They just vastly overspend on police, military and feed the beast economics to mask them giving billions in handouts to the rich and powerful.More than 3 times the expenditure per capita on military than the UK. And higher total military spending than the next 10 biggest spending countries combined. The incarceration rate is more than 5 times higher than the UK, yet the homicide rate is more than quadruple; because punishment doesn't reduce crime, higher spending on social welfare does.But if the us government decided to spend money on helping it's people to reduce crime, it's "big government" socialism and evil, if it spends money on punishing them and increasing crime, it's a "necessary minimumx, patriotic and good.They really are the biggest fucking dumbasses in the world, far worse than nearly all of Africa or the middle east, and the worst bits of the USA are just as bad as the worst bits of the above.
>>4184834True, like affirmative actionhttps://news.uark.edu/articles/8880/affirmative-action-may-reduce-crime-more-than-racial-profiling-researchers-findWhereas the police beatings of George Floyd were associated with an increase in crime https://academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/article/1/5/pgac189/6695312Which shows that persecution in its current form not only has an immediate effect on the micro scale, with those affected by the imprisonment of a family, friend or gang member more likely to commit crime either to support themselves following the loss of an income stream, or in retaliation against their acquaintances incarceration. But also on the macro scale, with Americans angry at the status quo.But if you want to pay more taxes so you can fulfill your persecution fetish, then you do you, but also check yourself for lead poisoning.Oh and before you go all "UrBaN ArEaS", rural areas have higher rates of homicide, suicide, drug death, violent and gun crime. Because believe it or not, more poor & desperate people live where it's cheaper than in city centres.
>>4184818Yes and because or that economics is not real for us. We are one of two countries who can, at any time, say that money is not real and never was. Also look at those stats closer - which people? Even adjusted for socioeconomic status, trailer trash need to be removed from the gene pool. If we cut more welfare they’ll do it to themselves.
>>4185558Could you not?
>>4185243>Giving people undeserved handouts possibly at the cost of taking opportunities away from people that actually earned it will solve crime>Punishing criminals will not>Why? Because if you arrest the criminals their friends will be mad and commit more crime.You more or less just said that there is an ongoing race war. There is only one solution to this, and it involves the permanent repeal of the first amendment and the institution of a race-agnostic eugenics program.
What do you own, what do you recommend?Why are photo backpacks so expensive and are they worth it?Any good budget bags? It seems a bit weird spending $400 for a backpack and then reading reviews saying that they get ripped after a year of moderate use.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS5 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image Created2012-12-10T11:33:33-05:00FlashNo Flash FunctionImage Width1000Image Height1006
>>4175830The actual reality is that you have a mountain of grapes on floor that say made in china, but the peak of the mountain reaches the height of the made in italy grapes, still in thr branch, "therefore they must be equal"
>>4183475They come in "jars" in EU[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpi
>>4184802RX100 II[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeGoogleCamera ModelPixel 7Camera SoftwareHDR+ 1.0.529100733zdMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.2Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)21 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width3648Image Height2736Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2023:05:31 22:14:34Exposure Time66667/1000000 secF-Numberf/2.2Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating667Lens Aperturef/2.2Brightness-1.6 EVExposure Bias0 EVSubject DistanceInfinityMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length2.74 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3648Image Height2736RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoDigital Zoom Ratio1.4Scene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeDistant View
>>4178249WHHIIIIIPPPPSNAKKKEE
>>4167349I run with a peli 1510 style case for backup and very infrequent equipment Thinktank retrospective 30 v2 as my main grab bag, it's pretty decent, can cram all of my stuff in there just about, but it's mainly to have at events for me to quickly change a lens or grab some flashesI may be getting the PD 10L sling bag as a kinda EDC travel bag for my important stuffAnd a PD 45L travel backpack for "one" bag travel etc. Had to hike a little for a session last month, did my shoulder in carrying a shoulder bag full of my stuff. Just wish I had a proper backpack at the time.
>sunny day>plenty of free time>expecting 4h of good light>"today it's happening">camera has batteries, gear is ready>"traffic is not ideal...">"can't find decent clothes for doing this">"not enough hours of sunlight...">and other very reasonable and useless excuses to not go>stayed home...again. I managed to go out two times last year, none this year.Bros... it's over, isn't it?Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4181871Fou you yesI have bewn in my 4 walls for over 10 years without friends or going out to meet people only playing vidya. I bought a camera in the hopes of forcing myself out. It worked have gone out hiking over 5 times in the last 2 weeks with every route being about 15 - 20 km.Got some good pictures, but honestly hiking is fucking boring, srill teying to find so'ething cool to do.
>>4182817>this. have a panasonic g7 + 100-400mm leica and it's very light in comparison with apsc and ff
>>4183001>macro
>>4182859You have been inside for 10 years, then went out for a hike and did 20km? That is actually quite a bit more than I would have expected. As for hiking being boring, either find something to do outside (maybe some bushcrafty stuff, learning plant species) or alternatively listen to podcasts (which I always think takes a lot away from being outside, but might still be something for you)
>>4181871It's easy to find reasons not to do something. Just make yourself go. I find that I usually have a better state of mind once I'm out
just got in to film photography because my bf is obsessed with photos. criticisms welcome pls tear my photos apart like confetti[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 8.10.008 (221031)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2023:05:13 15:55:22Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width3130Image Height2075
>>4179340Agree with >>4179350 only really nice one I see
>>4179340>/17/23(Wed)20:57:56 No.4179337▶>>4185399>File: 00009519002I like this one, but I also don't like people.Good shot.
>>4179342Samefag >>4185399 and >>4185400This one is also well done. I am a little biased because B&W has been my escapade lately for a project, but the cityscape tells a story, message. Bustling city, something to SHOW and therefore tell
>>4179331They're all boring and a waste of film. Buy a digital camera and learn the basics, then shoot film if you'd like once you learn more.
>>4179331Look for subjects. All these photos are pretty empty.it works for >>4179340 because the lines are interesting but the others don't really say anything.
How do I get my photos from snapshits to art? Is it really all in VSCO presets like everyone else uses?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D7000Camera SoftwareAdobe Bridge 2020 (Windows)PhotographerAJMMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)300 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Created2023:05:30 23:48:19Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length200.00 mmImage Width1600Image Height1059Exposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4184679yes
>>4184806ok
>>4184681Are you a Slav?
>>4184679composition, light, color and of course, subject
>>4184838Yes ;_;>>4185405All wrong
Anyone interested on working a zine together? I have one that works well, if anyone wants to join or just submit some work. Let me know !
>>4172390You may WhatsApp me at 9927043148
>>4172271I dont know wtf a zine is but I'm bored and have nothing to do currently. How do we get in touch? Email? Or just post pics here in thread?
>>4183383https://discord.gg/g6tCHPkf8There , send me a message on discord
>>4172390https://discord.gg/g6tCHPkf8There https://t.me/+ghv6LUv_W4Q2ZDAx
Extended submission for 10 days
I hate to admit it but for years I've been just applying goofy film pre-sets and playing with sliders until I get something that I think looks good (on my uncalibrated gaming monitor).I want to finally start to edit with a clear purpose but I don't know how to start.The tutorials I could find either focus on making dramatic looking landscape photographs or studio photography. I'm more interested in the kind of editing art and reportage photographers do.
>>4182434I also do this, edit the raws. leave them for a few years. edit again when I realized my previous edit was meh. but sometimes, there are instances that my edits from years ago were better than the new ones. and usually when editing, I'm always in the quest for finding the sweet spot which alludes me.
>>4181099Damn anon, that might fix society too.
>>4181892it's the same as it was in the darkroom, just much easier to repeat the desired result. my photoshop files look like those print notes, but those words are now translated into a couple curves layers with masks.
Start thinking in terms of an exposure curve instead of sliders. You’ll also just be fucking around with it for a while, but it will help you understand what you’re doing more in the long run
>>4181099I hope next year we get /p/ and /pol/ crossover on April fools
old thread:>>4126166This thread seemed so popular, probably the only thread on /p/ that has EVER hit bump limit which is saying something, I don't like that other racist Nikon thread so lets keep this wholesome one going.If f/1 is too wide for you this 50mm f/2 is quite handsome and compact in comparison.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width831Image Height637
>>4185187I'll bust out the manual
>>4185185shoot some test shots in the lighting conditions you think you'll be in and see if you're ok with the amount of noise that you'll get at f5.6.If you're not ok with that you can get a 70-200 (300mm equivalent) f2.8 from either Sigma or Tamron used but that's going to be a few hundred dollars probably much less than buying a new system though.
>>4185185It works like this: If a DX lens is f4.5, you have the same noise performance and DOF as a full frame user who is shooting at (4.5*1.5=) f6.7 and doubling their ISO to keep the shutter speed roughly the same as yours. In real life most likely slightly worse because noise is affected by sensor technology as well and pro cameras normally get slightly better sensors. Comparing really good new nikon (sony) sensors to really old nikon DX sensors, the full frame guy could have a cleaner image until doubling his ISO twice with the perfect match happening maybe a half stop below that.IRL people with larger sensors just shoot at the larger apertures because bokeh is cool anyways.
>>4143896kek. sister, why are you even here?
>>4185185There's a lot of confusion regarding equivalence. You don't have to multiply anything except you're trying to figure equivalents between systems. A FX or a DX 300mm are 300mm lenses no matter what sensor is behind them, but a 300mm on a DX camera will give you the same field of view as a 450mm on an FX camera would. People sometimes say DX cameras have 1.5x magnification, this is wrong. 1.5x is the crop factor. Magnification aka extra reach a camera gives is camera 1 pixel pitch divided by camera 2 pixel pitch. e.g. 3.89/3 for D3300/GH6. Result is 1.297x aka you get 29.7% more reach.
Have you done any diy modification on camera gear, /p/?I found this old helios-44 I shortened in order to get less vignetting for anamorphic projector lenses.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7SM3Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 24.5 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)94 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2023:06:01 12:43:05Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating4000Lens Aperturef/8.0Brightness3.9 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeAverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length94.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1500Image Height942RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
Aside from 3d Printing adapters for weird as fuck mounts like Adaptall2 to Samsung NX or M42 polarizer to lens hood mount so i can remove it fastI do the casey neistat tape on the screen mod, so you can pull the screen quicklyI extended the lens hood to add contrast of the helios44-4M by adding some chinese wide adapter to the front and removing the glass[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationRight-Hand, Top
>>4185270Oh, that's a neat little trick, the tape on the screen, I'll give it a go.
Is it me or did this guy turn into a zombie ever since he started his own photography channel? Or is it just the lazy editing?
>>4184665Its been almost 15 years nigger, he's married with a kid now.
>>4184665Fuck. He has got more energy than me after so long
>>4184751>married with a kidsheesh, how has he not been canceled?
Only does adds for hipster shiet
>>4184665it's probably HIV
Film prices are absolutely insane[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1360Image Height1338Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4180253Fridge. In the butter box.
>>4181233Damn. Not even anon and that was good asf.
>>4181236You can buy a great 24mp FF camera for that price.>but but muh film tonesLearn to edit chud
>>4181236>Film is pay as you go and way cheaper than buying such a digital camera.not in the long run. You can get a good body for $1000. That's only a couple thousand images in film. You're also not accounting for the price of developing film and the possibility of something going wrong in that time
>>4185166>couple thousand imagesA couple thousand more than the trips here.
Ebay has gone to shit, where else can i offload vintage gear and make enough profit to feed my lens addiction.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareGoogleImage-Specific Properties:
>>4184976Kek
>>4185080I didn't take any and I'm not gonna drive there to take them. just think of the usual shit, it's that
>>4185089>I didn't take any and I'm not gonna drive there to take them.Nophoto[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera ModelFZ-N1Equipment MakePANASONICMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.4Image-Specific Properties:Image Created2021:11:01 13:36:42Vertical Resolution72 dpiHorizontal Resolution72 dpiTime (UTC)17:36:42Date (UTC)2021:11:01Color Space InformationsRGBF-Numberf/2.4Focal Length2.97 mmLens Aperturef/2.3Exposure ModeAutoImage Height3264RenderingNormalScene Capture TypeStandardExposure Index365SharpnessNormalWhite BalanceAutoImage Width2448Metering ModePatternGain ControlUnknownFlashNo Flash, AutoContrastNormalExposure Bias0 EVISO Speed Rating1600Exposure Time1/24 sec
>>4185091I hate those fags so much. Same shit in all western countries. If it is a police chief you can be certain its a freemason pig.
>>4185091why would I waste film on>gay flag>black person flag>gay black flags
Can you anons tell me why I would need a tilt-shift lens if I can just edit the picture to look like it directly in camera?My only use for a tilt-shift lens would be for miniaturization of towns and cities.P.S pls rate pic and tell me how to improve it.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 90DImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2023:05:17 14:56:01Exposure Time1/400 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating160Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo FlashFocal Length135.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width6960Image Height4640RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4183708exactly.but you would be decieved if you never handled a tilt shift?Because I like hiking and taking these shots. Not sure if I should invest in a lens.
>>4183778It doesn't even look that much like a miniature, it looks like you blurred half the image. As soon as someone posts a real image from their cheap chinese tilt shift the gig is up. It's like using fake bokeh, people will pick up on the subtleties like the cutout effect.
>>4183782>As soon as someone posts a real image from their cheap chinese tilt shift the gig is upYeah, I'm sure someone will post it in year or two., just keep the thread up for so long.
>>4183281Is it possible to get the miniature effect without blur ?
>>4185014think about why you perceive a scene as miniature