Hi /p/, it's been a while. I've worked on a lot of projects over the last few years, but this one is still ongoing. Let me know what ya think.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 23.5 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Image Width4000Image Height4000Number of Bits Per Component16, 16, 16Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2023:04:28 21:27:08Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1100Image Height1100
I'm a noob so ignore everything I'll sayComfy stuff but I'm not taking away much from it I guess>>4303245 really dig this one though
>>4303244interesting>>4303245nice composition>>4303246yes>>4303252yes>>4303256no, faggotpretty decent /p/-tier photos. good job op
I can see talent, nonetheless most of it is BORING. Keep on trying.
>>4303240Love this one,
>>4303240Boring snapshits of your walk.
This is the most retarded shit I have ever read.
>>4304335Are da jooz in the room with us right now, anon?
>>4304398Who said anything about jews you fucking antisemiteG*d
>>4304249not reading that shit
>>4304407might hurt considering 99% of shitty amateurs (r)ape the new york school or new topographics, but it's truth. the 1% is just aping cinema.
>>4304333>He's articulated very succinctly a disdain for the rudimentary.thanks big brian. you must have experience huffing matza farts. I do appreciate your words, but the critic is obviously some type of highfalutin cunt.
TWENTY-FOUR - FIFTY - ONE HUNDRED AND THIRY-FIVE is the way to go AND YOU KNOW IT!
24-7070-200200-600
40mm85mm135mmSimple as
Why does no one here like UW? It's my favorite focal range when I can make it work.
>>430243318mm pancake with fixed f8 is all you need
>>4304476OP agrees.
Why people frown upon it?
>>4304360>Doing anything manually makes people think they're really photographers and more skilled.
>>4297696Fuckin neeerds hate seeing SPASM on their cameras bc they want to think of making image as being some exercise in purity. I love it. I shoot on programmed automagic all the time, jpg never raw, and throw out every third image just for lulz bc I'm ken fuckin rockwell and I am a goddamn photo theory arsonist.Just don't use P you dorks, A is useful, S for those instances (you know em), B when you really need to get jiggy wit it. M when you just need to set A & S & want to fuck up your shit with some crazy fucking iso and make a pointillist painting out of your image because why not.This shit is sophisticated AF. Matrix metering, AIS, SPASM, this thing is practically magic.
>>4304376If you don't know how to shoot manual, it's okay, you can just say that.
>>4297696Because PASM is dogshit if you're not a subhuman wedding "photographer".Auto is fine though.
>>4304600>Has a retarded gear opinion and brings up a vitriolic hatred of wedding photographersLemme guess, "just put A settings on every dial and make the camera look like a pentax k1000"-Fujislug-Leica lolcow-Nikon ZfoolCall it
>bondage editionare you a thick-neck chad or shoulderlet kind of strap guy?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 60DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2020:11:16 13:07:33Exposure Time1/40 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/2.8Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length40.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4304546You could have always posted evidence of your extravagant wealth like your leica on the hood of your BMW in your 3 car garage but I have a feeling your dad doesn't let you in the garage
>>4304549like I'm going to run around my house taking pics of expensive stuff just because some poorfag is envious of my 80 dollar camera straphope the bus is at least airconditioned in whatever 3rd world hellhole you live
>>4304551>no, i dont even have a cameraprotip, you can take a photo of your camera by setting it in front of a mirror.
>>4304559anon you might be retarded
>>4304340Strap! The one in pic related is like 10€ on amazon. It's very comfortable because the rope is very thick. The most important part is that it's very sturdy because all connections are megal. >>4304508It's not really abot dropping the camera. I like the strap because "sometimes" you need two hands and several lenses are not pocketable. I never carry my camera like this btw >>4304343
My camera has been sitting in the corner for like for ever and I've finally decided to get into photography. However I don't know where to start: do you have any book or youtube channel to recommend in order to learn the basics? I would like to do mostly model like shootings
>>4303150This. Just play with the settings, shooting the same scene to watch it change, you do not need to read shit and most photographers are schizoid midwits so reading shit might confuse youProper education was for film, especially film with flash, and yes even then the best photographers learned by experimenting.
>>4303409>picture.with the problempicture without the problem
>>4303067Have you already read and understood the owners' manual of your camera? Those tend to include basics and how to deal with it using that camera.
>>4303079That's probably the best book out there for learning photography. Read it, go out and take lots of pictures, then read it again.
>>4303067>book to learn the basicspeople on this board will literally do anything but go outside and take photos
Cheap digicam photography? Only started taking pics very recently on my parents' old Sony cam and I feel like I mog 90% of the posters here[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelDSC-S2000Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.3Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2015:03:15 20:03:46Exposure Time1/15 secF-Numberf/3.1Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating400Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceDaylightFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length6.20 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3648Image Height2736RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4298240Honestly people on this board are a bit shit at photography. OP's not mogging anyone with this but I got some 1970s and 1980s Nat Geos and they do mog the fuck out of almost everything I see online. Documentarian but full of style and beauty. It's insane how fun it is to flip through them and just look at the photography. I genuinely think almost no one knows how to take interesting photos anymore (at least for nature, I don't seek out much other photography). Is this a side effect of digital? Or are we all just dead inside now?
>>4304085Side effect of everyone already seeing everything a million times and not doing enough drugs
>>4304085>photographers that travel but not JUST to take picturesThese people are basically extinctTaking photos walking your fuckin dog results in more honest work than a pointless “photowalk”. These people did not “do photography”. They were wide eyed journalists immersed with wonder rather than interns afraid of running afoul of state censors and old boomers doing it for the paycheck.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon DIGITAL IXUS 960 ISCamera Softwaredarktable 4.6.1Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.9Focal Length (35mm Equiv)36 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:04:15 15:02:16Exposure Time451/250000 secF-Numberf/2.9Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating74Lens Aperturef/2.9Exposure Bias0 EVSubject Distance12.46 mMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length7.70 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2052Image Height1524
>>4298229>i feel like i mog 90% of users herethat's because 90% of users here take photos of nothing
and even though i as a 40 year old millennifart boomer often shit on gen-z i think it is kinda cool. Just imagine them going to whatever social gathering they are assembling in, bringing out all these cool semi-vintage digicams that nobody gave 2 shits about until recently..The market is absolutely booming right now.. they want it all. The shittiest model you can imagine? Guess what.. they want it and they want to pay more than yesterday.In certain niche markets these things sell for even above ebay prices which is insane.Gen-z is unironically making photography fun again?It is also quite interesting to think about the conditions that made this possible in the first place. So what happened exactly? My viewpoint is the following:Younger Gen-z social media users have only used cellphones for photography.. they have finally realized that the platform has limitations.. they look at pictures their parents took of them when they were kids using digicams and want that particular look etc, meanwhile the large camera companies have completely neglected this market segment thanks to plebs only using their phones. just look at Canon for instance.. they haven't released a single Ixus model in 7 years and their last hoorah was nothing special in terms of specifications so we have to go back even further to find their high end models. Other companies have done the same.. there is nothing to be seen from the likes of Nikon, Sony, Olympus, Fuji, Samsung or any of the companies that for years made these ultra-compact and cool looking cameras.It find it all really strange. You have a generation that simply loves this type of stuff and nothing to sell them. Just imagine these cameras with updated hardware, maybe some fresh colors and "limited edition" varieties.Also feel free to post pics of cool digicams.
>>4285524>It is also quite interesting to think about the conditions that made this possible in the first place.older point and shoot cameras have way more soul then cellphones. modern cell phones look good but they have crazy amounts of automatic post processing. also small sensors with high megapixel count has the effect of making photos look soulless. then you sprinkle a CCD sensor and you got a winner. I think I helped start this trend and the A590 has been on of my favorites.
>>4303821Marty’s mom really needed to do some hardcore gonzo titty worship porno in her prime and it’s an unforgivable sin that she didn’t tbqhwy
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon DIGITAL IXUS 960 ISCamera Softwaredarktable 4.6.1Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.9Focal Length (35mm Equiv)36 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:04:15 14:20:57Exposure Time5029/1000000 secF-Numberf/7.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating74Lens Aperturef/7.9Exposure Bias0 EVSubject Distance65.54 mMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length7.70 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1920Image Height1440
>>4285524Get ahead of the curve and start buying vintage DSLRs before it's too lateThey're already more expensive because they were always expensive, from launch. Are you ready for the future of $1200 D800s and people paying near MSRP for old EOS lenses?
>>4304500>Only $100!? This "film" camera takes infinite photos!>Don't order that mirrorless until you've tried THIS>REAL FILM GRAIN ON DIGITAL! Nikon D2x in 2024>Which one will people choose? D700 vs Z8 BLIND TEST
Why do old photographs looks so crystal sharp? Is it because of the giant glass negatives?
>>4301867Where do you think you are nigger?
>>4297371wide equivalent FOV compared to FF. Combined with tiny apertures (everything in focus) and long exposure. Voila. Very sharp.
>>4297371>Is it because of the giant glass negatives?probably. Those large formats had to have a megapixel equivalent of like over 100. it's amazing they were able to make sharp lenses.
>>4302678>calling someone else a turbo sperg when you're the one unable to read contextual cues like the date something is published, or the shift in tone between a recommendation to a mug punter and an actual technical analysis, which he frequently gives both of, or between a statement of opinion vs fact, comparison vs absolutism, etc.
>>4300665Look under Ryan Rockwell's page.
How the fuck do I get the angle right? It has never been my experience to have a dish in front where it's super puper obvious what exactly is worth showing. pic attached is one way to go about it, escpecially with lunch boxes where every slot should be shown, but is there a rule of thumb for angling? should i just go along with my guts on it? can't help but feel that i could have done a better job of a dish just by tilting the plate a tad.
i think you should build the meal around the angle rather than the other way around.food photography is so extremely fake to begin with, its basically a diorama but its edible (sometimes it isnt tho lmao)im really just talking out of my ass here btw ive never done food photography in my lifeoh and stick to one light source to illuminate the whole meal, makes for good highlights
>>4299256I like top down to show plating and portions, but the meal can't be hot or you'll fog your lens - at least from my experience shooting in a lightbox.I got sick of having to eat my incredible meal cold to be able to photo it, so I just take a quick phone snap and chow down now.
>>4299256Try using a 4x5 camera.
>>4299256Your food'll go cold if you do this shit. Just eat your meal instead of being some posh git, leave photography for more interesting subjects.
>>4299256An easy trick is dropping the food, you could of held a grape above the meal and photographed it falling, and then the money shot of it bouncing up in the air while the rest of the food gets slightly bumped.Best result is you need a 2nd person to just drop the plate of food and then you shoot as it hits the table and the food bounces.
Are you preparing for the eclipse? I just slapped a filter on my cheap 300mm tamron, no idea what I'm doing but I read a few things online.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D3400Camera Softwarepaint.net 5.0.13Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern14352Focal Length (35mm Equiv)450 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:03:28 17:46:05Exposure Time1/500 secF-Numberf/6.3Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating800Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length300.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width6000Image Height4000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4303560>to show that i planed in advanceAnd planning that firmly in advance for a weather-dependent event is still retarded even if you were lucky. What if the nearest clear skies were 100 milss or more from the hotel?
>>4303598He'd have a nice vacation for cheapWhy are you so mad?
From Lancaster, PA. Nikon D800 and 80-200mm F/2.8 D[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:04:08 16:20:29Color Space InformationsRGB
>>4303599pretty sure he is mad because he waited till the last minute to go somewhere and still cucked by clouds.>>4303598nigger, as you can see in my picture i have a 11 month old, i'm not driving hundreds of miles out of my way at the last minute with a baby screaming in my backseat for hours because some faggy weatherman told me to. also you clearly dont regularly look at weather reports if you think they're ever accurate. the entire two weeks ahead of the eclipse it was said indianapolis was going to have either mostly cloudy or rain as the weather on monday. the skys were clear the entire time. the only time i even had rain was for like an hour on tuesday when i went to the zoo.anyways where even are your eclipse pics itt?
just wanted to brag about my eclipse pic after seeing all of yours. >is it post processed yes>is it overexposedyes>is it still better than the others hereyes sir
ITT: previous work from more than 10 years ago that you shotI'm doing a huge data migration and have had a second look at all of my early stuff when I had a Digital Rebel. I'll post stuff as I get through it and see it. This particular one is 2011.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTiCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows)PhotographerunknownMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:03:27 22:09:36Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4302317[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
>>4302310Trains are classy because they can have amenities on boardA bus is just cramming 50 dirty hobos into a hollowed out and stretched VW beetle
>>4302412japan can do busses right[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 5D Mark IVCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/4.0Image-Specific Properties:Image Width6720Image Height4480Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Pixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2017:08:21 17:01:12White Point Chromaticity0.3Exposure Time1/30 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating1250Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length17.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1654Image Height1102RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4298895I regret never getting to see a shuttle launch. Based dude.
>>4301854The building's called Alba Nova, but NORDITA seems like the kind of people whod' hang out there.
Old thread>>4209257
>>4304018>astro gear gets used very littlethat's another aspect to it, there's realistically 2-3 nights every month that's good for imaging, and of those, it depends on cloud cover. so a generous assumption would be like 8 imaging sessions per year on a single piece of gear, with people maybe upgrading gear every 5-10 years or somy nikon labophot 2 from the 80s is going very strong. i assume most quality astro gear should last at least that long, say 2-3 decades or so. i'll look for the best quality EQ mount used in like a $2k budget
>>4303734>Scopes are different than normal camera lenses as they try to achieve optical perfection with as little as possible chromatic aberration, astigmatism and lens distortion (but that's only if you're imaging)anon, you just described every camera lens ever made
Annoyingly breezy last night, but I don't mind this one too much.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 90DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/6.2Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:04:13 21:49:43Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo FlashFocal Length400.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4280143whys this picture moving toward me ?
>>4303869seems like this comet likes to hide behind trees[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:04:12 22:07:56White Point Chromaticity0.3Exposure Time20 secF-Numberf/0.0Lens Aperturef/infExposure Bias0 EVFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width6000Image Height4000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualScene Capture TypeStandard
Took this photo of a cute lovely bird[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot SX120 ISMaximum Lens Aperturef/6.3Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaLens Size6.00 - 60.00 mmFirmware VersionFirmware Version 1.00Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution180 dpiVertical Resolution180 dpiImage Created1980:01:01 00:04:05Exposure Time1/1600 secF-Numberf/4.3ISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/4.3Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length60.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3648Image Height2736RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeManualFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeSharpnessNormalSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeManualImage SizeLargeFocus ModeSingleDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingFineMacro ModeNormalSubject Distance13.630 mWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed192Image Number130-1950
>>4239795i have one
>>4296093that very nice, more birds the better[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6000Camera SoftwareCapture One 23 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/8.0Focal Length (35mm Equiv)97 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiExposure Time1/15 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/8.0Brightness5.0 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length65.00 mmImage Width1800Image Height1200RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastHardSaturationHighSharpnessSoft
bump thread of photos
>>4279965comfy/10
>>4275675super cute
>forces you to use a tripod or set your ISO to 256 million in low light>forces you to use an ND in daylightwhen will this shit technology improve?
>>4303980>sensor can only be used once before necessitating complete replacementlol, lmao even>baked in color, requires changing entire sensor for different gradespfft what a joke format
>>4303985I wouldn’t know
I wish we'd get CCD sensors back
>>4304010Your behavior exposes the lie.
>>4304033If you say so