File: 1685639380043.jpg (80 KB, 1800x1202)

80 KB JPG

This >>4185168 and using equipment that isn't shit (and KNOWING your equipment). If I don't fuck up in an obvious way, it's not hard to get right, unless it's extremely dark like picrel. And even then the focus is ok, just on the wrong eye.
The hard part on shooting in low light isn't sharp focus, it's shooting subjects that move faster than ~1/50 can freeze. In which case you just have to use flash or crank up the iso very high.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D750
Camera Software	Ver.1.15
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	664
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	4000
Exposure Bias	-3.5 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	6016
Image Height	4016
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	High Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

this thread proves that barely anyone here actually knows about how photography works

>>4185158
f/8+ and flash
/thread

>>4185196
>not knowing technologically is a word
>not knowing how f8 works
>posting his opinion

yikes

>>4185183
>no come back so turns to grammar naziism to feel superior
lol imagine caring about grammar in a place like this lol

>>4184646
neither
get a high quality manual focus prime instead
do it or waste money on a zoom now, inevitably regret it and buy later the prime you should have bought now
>why would i do this?
*because a high quality prime will btfo any zoom
*you can step back if your need to go wider and step forward if you need to go narrower
*you'll also be able to go wider and crop down if needed with a prime as clarity and sharpness of a prime will surpass any equivalent zoom

>>4185217
This retard must not realize how much difference there is between 10 and 20mm.

Sugma 10-20 is a thing. No idea if it’s better, but know that it’s an option. I have one and it’s alright.

>>4184646
Both are good. 10-18 has a plastic lens mount, but is also lighter and smaller. I've owned the 10-18 and it was really handy. All the last generation EF-S "STM" lenses are excellent, IMO. That said, I can't vouch for durability. I only used them a short period of time before switching to full frame.

>>4184779
>the grinding of the DC micro motor.
I used to own one of these lenses and it focused silently.

>>4185240
>Sugma 10-20 is a thing
The f3.5? It's not good

10-18 hands down no contest

honorable mention to the Tokina 11-16 which is also gud

>>4184620
Overall tax burden is very similar to the rest of the developed world. They just vastly overspend on police, military and feed the beast economics to mask them giving billions in handouts to the rich and powerful.

More than 3 times the expenditure per capita on military than the UK. And higher total military spending than the next 10 biggest spending countries combined. The incarceration rate is more than 5 times higher than the UK, yet the homicide rate is more than quadruple; because punishment doesn't reduce crime, higher spending on social welfare does.

But if the us government decided to spend money on helping it's people to reduce crime, it's "big government" socialism and evil, if it spends money on punishing them and increasing crime, it's a "necessary minimumx, patriotic and good.

They really are the biggest fucking dumbasses in the world, far worse than nearly all of Africa or the middle east, and the worst bits of the USA are just as bad as the worst bits of the above.

>>4184834
True, like affirmative action
https://news.uark.edu/articles/8880/affirmative-action-may-reduce-crime-more-than-racial-profiling-researchers-find

Whereas the police beatings of George Floyd were associated with an increase in crime https://academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/article/1/5/pgac189/6695312

Which shows that persecution in its current form not only has an immediate effect on the micro scale, with those affected by the imprisonment of a family, friend or gang member more likely to commit crime either to support themselves following the loss of an income stream, or in retaliation against their acquaintances incarceration. But also on the macro scale, with Americans angry at the status quo.

But if you want to pay more taxes so you can fulfill your persecution fetish, then you do you, but also check yourself for lead poisoning.

Oh and before you go all "UrBaN ArEaS", rural areas have higher rates of homicide, suicide, drug death, violent and gun crime. Because believe it or not, more poor & desperate people live where it's cheaper than in city centres.

>>4184818
Yes and because or that economics is not real for us. We are one of two countries who can, at any time, say that money is not real and never was.

Also look at those stats closer - which people? Even adjusted for socioeconomic status, trailer trash need to be removed from the gene pool. If we cut more welfare they’ll do it to themselves.

>>4185558
Could you not?

>>4185243
>Giving people undeserved handouts possibly at the cost of taking opportunities away from people that actually earned it will solve crime
>Punishing criminals will not
>Why? Because if you arrest the criminals their friends will be mad and commit more crime.
You more or less just said that there is an ongoing race war. There is only one solution to this, and it involves the permanent repeal of the first amendment and the institution of a race-agnostic eugenics program.

>>4175830
The actual reality is that you have a mountain of grapes on floor that say made in china, but the peak of the mountain reaches the height of the made in italy grapes, still in thr branch, "therefore they must be equal"

File: 4009900517720.jpg (74 KB, 1000x1000)

74 KB JPG

>>4183475
They come in "jars" in EU

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

File: PXL_20230601_051434537.jpg (1.59 MB, 3648x2736)

1.59 MB JPG

>>4184802
RX100 II

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Google
Camera Model	Pixel 7
Camera Software	HDR+ 1.0.529100733zd
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	21 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3648
Image Height	2736
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2023:05:31 22:14:34
Exposure Time	66667/1000000 sec
F-Number	f/2.2
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	667
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Brightness	-1.6 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	Infinity
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	2.74 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3648
Image Height	2736
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Digital Zoom Ratio	1.4
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Distant View

>>4178249
WHHIIIIIPPPPSNAKKKEE

>>4167349
I run with a peli 1510 style case for backup and very infrequent equipment

Thinktank retrospective 30 v2 as my main grab bag, it's pretty decent, can cram all of my stuff in there just about, but it's mainly to have at events for me to quickly change a lens or grab some flashes

I may be getting the PD 10L sling bag as a kinda EDC travel bag for my important stuff

And a PD 45L travel backpack for "one" bag travel etc.

Had to hike a little for a session last month, did my shoulder in carrying a shoulder bag full of my stuff. Just wish I had a proper backpack at the time.

>>4181871
Fou you yes
I have bewn in my 4 walls for over 10 years without friends or going out to meet people only playing vidya. I bought a camera in the hopes of forcing myself out. It worked have gone out hiking over 5 times in the last 2 weeks with every route being about 15 - 20 km.
Got some good pictures, but honestly hiking is fucking boring, srill teying to find so'ething cool to do.

>>4182817
>this. have a panasonic g7 + 100-400mm leica and it's very light in comparison with apsc and ff

>>4183001
>macro

>>4182859
You have been inside for 10 years, then went out for a hike and did 20km? That is actually quite a bit more than I would have expected. As for hiking being boring, either find something to do outside (maybe some bushcrafty stuff, learning plant species) or alternatively listen to podcasts (which I always think takes a lot away from being outside, but might still be something for you)

>>4181871
It's easy to find reasons not to do something. Just make yourself go. I find that I usually have a better state of mind once I'm out

>>4179340
Agree with >>4179350 only really nice one I see

>>4179340
>/17/23(Wed)20:57:56 No.4179337▶>>4185399
>File: 00009519002

I like this one, but I also don't like people.

Good shot.

>>4179342
Samefag >>4185399 and >>4185400
This one is also well done. I am a little biased because B&W has been my escapade lately for a project, but the cityscape tells a story, message. Bustling city, something to SHOW and therefore tell

>>4179331
They're all boring and a waste of film. Buy a digital camera and learn the basics, then shoot film if you'd like once you learn more.

>>4179331
Look for subjects. All these photos are pretty empty.
it works for >>4179340 because the lines are interesting but the others don't really say anything.

>>4184679
yes

>>4184806
ok

>>4184681
Are you a Slav?

>>4184679
composition, light, color and of course, subject

>>4184838
Yes ;_;

>>4185405
All wrong

>>4172390
You may WhatsApp me at 9927043148

>>4172271
I dont know wtf a zine is but I'm bored and have nothing to do currently. How do we get in touch? Email? Or just post pics here in thread?

>>4183383
https://discord.gg/g6tCHPkf8T
here , send me a message on discord

>>4172390
https://discord.gg/g6tCHPkf8T
here https://t.me/+ghv6LUv_W4Q2ZDAx

File: 1683888569700082.jpg (6 KB, 240x240)

6 KB JPG

Extended submission for 10 days

>>4182434
I also do this, edit the raws. leave them for a few years. edit again when I realized my previous edit was meh. but sometimes, there are instances that my edits from years ago were better than the new ones. and usually when editing, I'm always in the quest for finding the sweet spot which alludes me.

>>4181099
Damn anon, that might fix society too.

>>4181892
it's the same as it was in the darkroom, just much easier to repeat the desired result. my photoshop files look like those print notes, but those words are now translated into a couple curves layers with masks.

Start thinking in terms of an exposure curve instead of sliders. You’ll also just be fucking around with it for a while, but it will help you understand what you’re doing more in the long run

>>4181099
I hope next year we get /p/ and /pol/ crossover on April fools

>>4185187
I'll bust out the manual

>>4185185
shoot some test shots in the lighting conditions you think you'll be in and see if you're ok with the amount of noise that you'll get at f5.6.
If you're not ok with that you can get a 70-200 (300mm equivalent) f2.8 from either Sigma or Tamron used but that's going to be a few hundred dollars probably much less than buying a new system though.

>>4185185
It works like this: If a DX lens is f4.5, you have the same noise performance and DOF as a full frame user who is shooting at (4.5*1.5=) f6.7 and doubling their ISO to keep the shutter speed roughly the same as yours. In real life most likely slightly worse because noise is affected by sensor technology as well and pro cameras normally get slightly better sensors. Comparing really good new nikon (sony) sensors to really old nikon DX sensors, the full frame guy could have a cleaner image until doubling his ISO twice with the perfect match happening maybe a half stop below that.

IRL people with larger sensors just shoot at the larger apertures because bokeh is cool anyways.

>>4143896
kek. sister, why are you even here?

>>4185185
There's a lot of confusion regarding equivalence. You don't have to multiply anything except you're trying to figure equivalents between systems. A FX or a DX 300mm are 300mm lenses no matter what sensor is behind them, but a 300mm on a DX camera will give you the same field of view as a 450mm on an FX camera would. People sometimes say DX cameras have 1.5x magnification, this is wrong. 1.5x is the crop factor. Magnification aka extra reach a camera gives is camera 1 pixel pitch divided by camera 2 pixel pitch. e.g. 3.89/3 for D3300/GH6. Result is 1.297x aka you get 29.7% more reach.

File: 20230601_1324351.jpg (73 KB, 1210x908)

73 KB JPG

Aside from 3d Printing adapters for weird as fuck mounts like Adaptall2 to Samsung NX or M42 polarizer to lens hood mount so i can remove it fast

I do the casey neistat tape on the screen mod, so you can pull the screen quickly

I extended the lens hood to add contrast of the helios44-4M by adding some chinese wide adapter to the front and removing the glass

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Right-Hand, Top

>>4185270
Oh, that's a neat little trick, the tape on the screen, I'll give it a go.

>>4184665
Its been almost 15 years nigger, he's married with a kid now.

>>4184665
Fuck.
He has got more energy than me after so long

>>4184751
>married with a kid
sheesh, how has he not been canceled?

Only does adds for hipster shiet

>>4184665
it's probably HIV

>>4180253
Fridge. In the butter box.

File: 1669535695449267.png (1.6 MB, 1105x976)

1.6 MB PNG

>>4181233
Damn. Not even anon and that was good asf.

>>4181236
You can buy a great 24mp FF camera for that price.
>but but muh film tones
Learn to edit chud

>>4181236
>Film is pay as you go and way cheaper than buying such a digital camera.
not in the long run. You can get a good body for $1000. That's only a couple thousand images in film. You're also not accounting for the price of developing film and the possibility of something going wrong in that time

>>4185166
>couple thousand images

A couple thousand more than the trips here.

>>4184976
Kek

>>4185080
I didn't take any and I'm not gonna drive there to take them. just think of the usual shit, it's that

File: LCSO.jpg (2.52 MB, 2448x3264)

2.52 MB JPG

>>4185089
>I didn't take any and I'm not gonna drive there to take them.
Nophoto

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	FZ-N1
Equipment Make	PANASONIC
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.4
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2021:11:01 13:36:42
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Time (UTC)	17:36:42
Date (UTC)	2021:11:01
Color Space Information	sRGB
F-Number	f/2.4
Focal Length	2.97 mm
Lens Aperture	f/2.3
Exposure Mode	Auto
Image Height	3264
Rendering	Normal
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Index	365
Sharpness	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Image Width	2448
Metering Mode	Pattern
Gain Control	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Auto
Contrast	Normal
Exposure Bias	0 EV
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Exposure Time	1/24 sec

>>4185091
I hate those fags so much. Same shit in all western countries. If it is a police chief you can be certain its a freemason pig.

>>4185091
why would I waste film on
>gay flag
>black person flag
>gay black flags

>>4183708
exactly.
but you would be decieved if you never handled a tilt shift?
Because I like hiking and taking these shots. Not sure if I should invest in a lens.

>>4183778
It doesn't even look that much like a miniature, it looks like you blurred half the image. As soon as someone posts a real image from their cheap chinese tilt shift the gig is up. It's like using fake bokeh, people will pick up on the subtleties like the cutout effect.

>>4183782
>As soon as someone posts a real image from their cheap chinese tilt shift the gig is up
Yeah, I'm sure someone will post it in year or two., just keep the thread up for so long.

>>4183281
Is it possible to get the miniature effect without blur ?

>>4185014
think about why you perceive a scene as miniature