>>3680653
8 x 5 meters studio owner here. Its enough but just barely. I would love it to be 8 x 7 since I cant put the strobes far away from the model. Also keep in mind you need 2 more things. Storage space (for fabrics, accessories, props, modifiers) and a place where the model changes clothes and puts make up. You will need a good mirror with lighting for that.

Hey OP, are you still here? Do you have any drawings or floor plans on what you want to design? I'm strangely fascinated with your studio shed idea and was curious for some updates.

File: peter-mckinnon-your-backg(...).jpg (87 KB, 1280x720)

87 KB JPG

>WASSSUP /P/ ITS MCKINNON HERE AND TODAY IM GOING TO SHOW YOU...
>long pause
>HOW TO MAKE A /P/ SHED. BUT FIRST... INTRO.
>fart, pop, piss
>Well now that I'm back with that sick ass dump
>*leans into camera and whispers,
>so sick dude
>WE ARE GOING TO MAKE OUR... VERY... OWN... /P/ SHED
>ONE, forget photography for a second and settle on down with shelves
>THATS RIGHT SHELVES
>You gotta have a place to put you ABSOLUTELY SICK gear.
>Like for me
>*whispering again
>See this beauty right here?
>*twirls it in front of the camera between his fingers

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

File: laughing americans.png (243 KB, 592x448)

243 KB PNG

>>3681666
I don't even know who that is but I can't stop laughing to this stupid post.

>>3681672
it's actually not that far off

>>3681659
Man, you’re clueless.

>>3681667
Just my critique. Give me an analysis. Show me where you see beauty in that. It is just trainwreck photography: something off enough to grab your attention for the sake of attention grabbing.

>>3681669
He's calling you clueless because you don't understand the Japanese street fashion photography scene. It doesn't matter if you're right or wrong, that scene is just what it is.

>>3681643
We're talking about film, not Fuji's digital products. The jpegs do not have the magenta shift like Fuji's velvia film stock. Are you retarded?

>>3681669
The mission statement of this photography is not “I’m going to take a beautiful photo” — he’s wandering around one neighbourhood in Tokyo finding the stylish people that used to congregate there, putting them dead center in the frame.

This is literally just street fashion blog photography, just happens to be done in an iconic era of Japanese fashion. You’re only looking at these as artistic photos because they happen to mostly be shot in good light, a lot of this guys photos are extremely drab snapshots, because they’re only about the outfits.

>>3681038
>I'm literally going to need to shoot hundreds if not thousands of pictures in a single day.

Good point. Silent shutter does increase battery life by a large margin. I'll just throw my camera into it when running low.

File: VID_20200706_165053_01_01.webm (201 KB, 1080x1920)

201 KB WEBM

>>3678917
>Is this the result of electronic shutters on modern phone cameras?
Yup. I captured that effect 2 days ago during a lightning storm but it wasn't as prominent as that picture. Mainly because the lightning was a couple of kilometers away.

>>3678917
Yeah, perfect timing rolling over the area where lightning struck.

>>3678796
>asks about electronic shutter
>posts shutter blades in action

>>3681676
>posts shutter blades in action
>while discussing avoiding this action due to unwanted side-effects
Makes perfect sense to me

File: Canon Impossible.jpg (151 KB, 1888x1301)

151 KB JPG

>>3681702
Nah, better use a native lens on your EOS-M, like the 22mm or the 11mm-something.
Next time : >>3680325 >>catalog

File: bench2.jpg (1.12 MB, 2692x1712)

1.12 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 7D Mark II
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Photographer	Yves Longpres
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.1.3
Lens Name	EF28-70mm f/2.8L USM
Lens Size	28.00 - 70.00 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2020:07:07 22:09:37
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	3200
Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	45.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Mode	Manual
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Spot
Sharpness	Unknown
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Large
Focus Mode	AI Focus
Drive Mode	Single
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Unknown
Macro Mode	Normal
Color Matrix	132
Color Temperature	5200 K
White Balance	Daylight
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	320

if anyone wants to collate these images into a video and but my song overtop i would love to colab with you. heres the track but i can get it to you audio only.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSm8BzMQuPA

>>3681403

Digging your music man, not big into video editing but whoever does it feel free to grab any of the above.

you got any Photos to post?

>>3681403
Great song I am impressed.

File: DSC03162.jpg (734 KB, 2048x1368)

734 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Google
Image-Specific Properties:

File: nov19199.jpg (476 KB, 5135x5135)

476 KB JPG

I own two 500 C/Ms and an SWC. Of all my medium format cameras these are the most flexible and dependable while remaining relatively compact in their dimensions.

At that price, ensure it has an acute matte focus screen, and check that the film magazine inserts have matching serial numbers to the backs themselves, to ensure factory caliberated film flatness. This is very important.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

Excuse me, 2000? I think it's way too expensive for what you are getting even though prices have inflated because of youtube. I do appreciate it having a waist level viewfinder but I wouldn't pay over 1200,- Unless you are jumping for one in mint condition and don't see a lot of Hasselblads being offered wherever you are I would negotiate for a lower price or wait for a better deal. But hey, that's me.

>>3681220
>that image
kek

Buy it, but never use it.

Store it in a safe place and give it about 10 years, it will be worth about 10K.

Film is dead. Medium format is awkward, expensive and no one gives a shit about if you took a picture on your phone or on some "medium format" camera.

>b-buh it's got a big negative so that means...

YAWN.

But it, store it, sell it.

>>3681334
it's average to high. probably worth it if it's new in the box.
I have never paid more than $600 for a 500c/m

>>3679757
>thinking the shutter doesn’t effect image quality

the absolute state of poorfags

>>3679757
Will my pictures look as good as leica with the 40mm and 28mm rokkor m lenses made for the cl and cle

>>3679813
no those are minolta

>>3679545
>Would you ever get a minolta cle? I'm into both the 40mm and the 28mm.
I owned one (it was a Leica CL but same camera), I didn't care for it because it felt too small in my hands. My friend who I sold it to loves it though.
>Well my pictures look like a leica?
it is a Leica, the Rokko lenses are great but you can use Leica glass if you really want to.
>Should I just get an m5?
different camera but it's also a good camera. the light meters in both are finicky and probably won't work.
>And yeah I made an entire thread for this question. Gonna be honest we are slow as fuck. Who cares lol.
exactly

>>3679545
Yeah.
It’s one of the most practical m-cameras ever (along with the M7 and RX-A Bessas) on grounds of aperture priority alone.
But I think it’s even more practical due to the smaller size and weight. If it’s too small for your hands you can put the small grip on it which brings it up to the bulk of the other cameras (if that), is ergonomic to hold and can be removed any time.

The M5 is also a great camera, easily the most ergonomic Leica body and controls (body shape, shutter ring, meter display, aperture visible in viewfinder). And the quickest to shoot if you disregard the aperture priority M7.

>>3679091
I recently started using VSCO social aspect, for posting photos.
been alot better than instagram

>>3679091
I fell for it a bit on instagram, then took a break for a few months. Back on it now just posting my stuff, not giving a fuck how many likes I get. One of the people I used to follow started not including certain tags in his photos because they weren't featuring his photos enough. That just enforced me not becoming like that. That and being popular on instagram basically requires complete over-editing to gain any recognition.

Thinking about it, what social media for photos are there anyway?
500px is a paywalled chink stock scam, IG is a fag maze, Flickr is basically a storage system with a small notes section

File: Lain in a Bearskin.png (1.19 MB, 1516x1076)

1.19 MB PNG

>>3680924
>mfw posting some of my photos on linkedin

I thought that was the go/to site for getting work but seems like people just use it for a more "mature" facebook where cute women post pics of themselfs in fancy suits?

How can I make some money on the side from my bird photos?

>>3680924
500px uses AI to predict what tags should go with your photograph and it's very accurate. I'm almost suspicious that 500px is mainly an AI learning tool.

>>3681655
>linkedin
loool, I uploaded a few photos to my LinkedIn as well even though nobody is going to see it and it makes little sense to do so there unless you're a professional photographer. It's probably good though to put a couple of your best photographs on there though since you never know if you can earn a gig from an old coworker or something. Professional portraits is something I've had in mind since most people joining LinkedIn may have little money but want a good portrait, making a demand for low price beginners to build some experience and cash. I don't know what I'm talking about really but that's the fantasy that runs through my head anyways.

>>3681609

Simply start taking photos again.

>>3680260
hope you get better too anon this was pretty cool of you to give away

Was this the advert they were placing all over instagram? Saw it but thought it was too good to be true...

>>3681174
>$200 promo to be able to spam the fuck out of people
>too good to be true

>>3681319
Yeah didn't think about it like that...it's one of those things though...'free' never really means 'free' in my experience.

File: img030.jpg (126 KB, 793x495)

126 KB JPG

>>3681322
OP here
Their price model is just outside of the voucher they provide. I got a $150 off, but the book will cost $170.

I usually print a lot of my photos in books for personal use. If their product is good, I might come back to them.
snapshit incoming

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Windows Photo Editor 10.0.10011.16384
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2020:07:08 10:37:25
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: IMG_0548.jpg (938 KB, 1280x853)

938 KB JPG

>>3679966

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon PowerShot SX420 IS
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Lens Size	4.30 - 180.60 mm
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.00
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	180 dpi
Vertical Resolution	180 dpi
Image Created	2020:06:27 03:56:51
Exposure Time	1/2 sec
F-Number	f/5.0
Lens Aperture	f/5.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	22.38 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5152
Image Height	3432
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Mode	Program
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Evaluative
ISO Speed Rating	Auto
Sharpness	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Large
Focus Mode	Single
Drive Mode	Single
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Fine
Macro Mode	Normal
Subject Distance	39.800 m
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	192
Image Number	105-0548

File: C58F1D8D-7E98-4DCD-80AD-1(...).jpg (538 KB, 1280x1024)

538 KB JPG

>>3679966
This one is pretty cool.

Also kicking myself for not bringing a faster lens.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1280
Image Height	1024

File: IMG_7231_edit.jpg (656 KB, 853x1280)

656 KB JPG

>>3680417
Yeah it is. That's what I get for making adjustments on my phone afterwards.

File: P200704-0350.jpg (443 KB, 1000x667)

443 KB JPG

Wouldn't be the Fourth of July without some idiot burning down their shed.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 70D
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	400
Shutter Speed	1/4000 sec
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Focal Length	200.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Exposure Mode	Auto

File: jupiter.jpg (48 KB, 611x355)

48 KB JPG

>>3680415

>I never understood why people do this. Like yeah, you took a picture of something that's been photographed a gorrilion times and can be seen anywhere on earth, congrats.
taking pictures of the night sky and celestial objects is more about "nerding out" than trying to stand out. the camera/lens enables you to see details you normally wouldn't be able to see with the naked eye and it's just really fun to snap a quick picture of the moon when you're outside at night and zooming in on it to get a more complete view.

for example, here's a shot of Jupiter I took a couple nights back, it's by no means a great picture, but there's something really cool about the fact that with just a normal DSLR camera and a 200mm lens, you're able to see some of the moons orbiting around the planet.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

File: P170523-4055.jpg (431 KB, 667x1000)

431 KB JPG

>>3678503
(The name of this band was "Turtle Club")

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	12800
Shutter Speed	1/320 sec
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Focal Length	32.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Exposure Mode	Auto

File: _DSC9298-2 lower.jpg (1.11 MB, 6000x4000)

1.11 MB JPG

>>3654696
took this back in 2015 I think

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3300
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.12
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	776
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	52 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2020:07:04 23:31:55
Exposure Time	1/400 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	-0.7 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	35.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: _DSC9209-2 lower.jpg (1.88 MB, 5743x3829)

1.88 MB JPG

>>3679961
ah shit - I fucked it all up
forget the previous image
here's the correct image
also 2015 - same 'roll'

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3300
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.12
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	776
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	52 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2020:07:04 23:39:59
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	35.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3679961
Sehr gut.

File: P180103-00100.jpg (414 KB, 1000x667)

414 KB JPG

>>3679970
Night after night, who treats you right, baby

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	250
Shutter Speed	1/60 sec
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Exposure Mode	Auto

>>3681581
Cont. or what I can easily imagine, even over 10 seconds, is the way mobile phones take several short exposed shots and superimpose them where possible. But I understand that's not happening here, right?

>>3681582
At what exposure time?

>>3681585
Whatever it wanted, it was aperture priority wide open.

>>3681587
This sounds like sufficient exposure at 6 stop stabilization, but not necessarily camera shake or corners under control. Anyway! Maybe a bit of scepticism is better than trusting that it should be impressive! Thank you for the insight!

>>3681575
>If Olympus can do it, everyone else can catch u
Maybe they don't want to catch up and end up lowering the image quality. Ever thought about that?

>>3681573
It sounds more like you are the shill to be honest. Nice olympus advertisement, but why would you want to invent such an aggressive IBIS to begin with if you know it will destroy your corners and force you to crop it off with electronic stabilisation?

It's better to just keep the IBIS settings conservatively to begin with.

File: Screenshot_20200708_104331.jpg (149 KB, 1080x1262)

149 KB JPG

The only photography anyone cares about is their own.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	CLT-L09
Equipment Make	HUAWEI
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1080
Image Height	1262
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2020:07:08 10:43:31
Image Height	1262
Image Width	1080

>>3681375
t. gommie

>>3681375
Nice blog here's an upvote

>>3681503
I can't even muster up the delusion to care about my own photography

>>3681503
I mean you're not wrong lol

I can already imagine thousands of white people who listen to Kendrick Lamar taking pictures of that thing each year