Self-serve ads are available again! Check out our new advertising page here.
Trying to get a fair comparison of the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II and Mark III. For someone who is exclusively interested with photography, is the newer version worth it ? I've heard that the Mark II have some features for photography that the Mark III does not have.I'd rather save a few bucks if it makes sense, but I don't know anything about theses cameras, never had the chance to get my hands on it yet.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareGoogleImage-Specific Properties:
get the II if you don't "need" 4k. I think bracketing and some other settings are gimped on the III.
>>3860954I've seen people dunk them on water, it's better than the em10 which lacks any!>>3860985I thought the mark IV was the plastic one, not the Mark III
>>3861320Yeah I did more research and the M5 Mark II is a way better solid choice than the M10 II or III
>>3861422Agreed. I'm looking at the em10 iv to upgrade my epl7 but the em5 ii at only $350 used is a good deal. It may not have the 20mp sensor it still has a higher viewfinder magnification and had the high res mode. Also headphone port and weather sealing. Em10 iii and em10 ii doesnt come close unless you want a slightly smaller and lighter camera.
>>3861948>a slightly smaller and lighter cameraI wouldn't want a camera the size of a phone to be honest, I like it a little bit bulkier but still portable.Go for the M5 II, $350 is an excellent deal and a net improvement from the epl7. By the way the fully rotating screen on the M5 II is an amazing feature and it gives you so much possibilities ; if you're into autoportrait for instance, definitely go for it. And the weather sealing and magnesium alloy body will only increase its quality over time. The M10s (except the M10 II which is made out of metal) built quality look a bit questionable.
Is there an image hosting service out there that supports animated webps? I can't find any.Any help would be much appreciated.Thank you
>>3861631>nokohello old friend. When was the last time you posted here lol
>>3862348lol I post here maybe once a year. I don't lurk.I take it we no longer need to use "noko" to avoid getting bumped back to the threads page? Since when?
>>3862374since like.... 10 years ago?
>>38624468, fucking newfag
>>3862698time sure flies.
Sigh just some shit photos im so depressed[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX100VCamera SoftwareDigital Camera X100V Ver1.10Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution63 dpiVertical Resolution63 dpiImage Created2021:01:17 23:08:10Exposure Time1/52 secF-Numberf/2.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating3200Lens Aperturef/2.0Brightness-2.7 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length23.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width5461Image Height3639RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>3859331[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS CORPORATIONCamera ModelPEN-FCamera SoftwareDxO PhotoLab 4.1.1Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Color Filter Array Pattern23168Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2021:01:08 15:56:47Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating80Exposure Bias0 EVSubject Distance9.43 mMetering ModePatternLight SourceFine WeatherFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length60.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width5184Image Height3456RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>3859311>>3859315any pics of belfast during the riots?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePakon, IncCamera ModelF135_PLUSCamera SoftwareCapture One 20 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Width2941Image Height1086
>>3860748No.I don't live in Belfast, and heading out to someplace and risking getting the car hijacked and burned is kinda... hmmmmmmmmThe first night of rioting happened near to where my father is buried, but since then, it's sort of been moving to different parts of Northern Ireland.I have been taking pictures of loyalist graffiti and signs lately, since it makes for interesting subjects for what is effectively now deserted street photography, lmfao.https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-56699716A freelancer on assignment from a Turkish newspaper got his car fucked up. The other night, a teenager fucking destroyed this photojournalist's Canon DSLR and telephoto lens. It's getting... fucking crazy now. If I was in the "right place in the right time", I would probably take pictures from about as much of a safe distance as possible, but shit's getting out of hand.I remember the "flag protests" that happened over a decade ago, and the protestors blocking major roads, but alas, I was too young to really be engaged.... let alone photograph it.
>>3860802based brexit is gonna make Northern Ireland finally free
Ireland is so depressing
I really fucking wish the gearfaggots were as autistic about photography/photographers as they are about gear. Why you are like this bros? This mere mindless consooming of analogue and digital toy will turn your soul into a spiritual desert. Why you aren't obsessive about art? Why do you fags focus on tools and not the artwork?
>>3862308I'm ok with people with GAS. For one they provide revenue for camera companies to survive. Next is since I'm cheap I get to afford second hand gear.For the record most gearfags I know shoot a lot which is a good thing.
>>3862488>most gearfags I know
>>3862308>implying photography is artKek, why are photofags like this?
>>3862624Photography is what each individual makes it. If you are unable to see its potential for art then its says more about your lack of imagination than any failures on their part.
>>3862628Oooh so art is just like my imaginary qt3.14 Asian waifu? Gotcha ;)
Anon has already started with his story of his reproved snapshit:http://archive.nyafuu.org/p/thread/3862461/I'll go next. I bought 3 Sony A7iii last year. The first one second-hand, photographed a wedding with it, a 8 day hike, a day trip, then sold it because I hated it, bought a new one, used it as a webcam and took about 90 test shots to choose the best lens from an order of 4 lenses, then sold the camera, bought a new one, use it as a webcam and took 7 shots so far to compare the start-up time to the first shot against a Canon 6D. Several private photos since 2018 sit unedited on my hard drive. Edited are only the photos that were commissioned.True story - the Sony A7iii makes a great webcam, where the Canon 6D sucked at it.Oh, and image related. My head is not the brightest.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2015:12:10 15:46:43Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/2.8ISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/2.8FlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length200.00 mm
>>3862496Nice blog.
>>3862496The best camera is the one you put on a tripod to use a webcam for the 16 12 year olds who bothered to watch you die at warzone. in other funny news op is fag and sony is better than fuji
Who do you think will be the first to make a modern 3-CMOS R-G-B sensor DSLR? It has to logically be the next high-end tech to consumer camera step.>bayer, x-tranny & fovean will be BTFO
>>3861909because it used nikkor lenses on a super ccd sensor.
>>3861909The sensor had small pixels for resolution and big pixels for low light sensitivity
>>3861896Based
>>3861896Just put slide film in a F100 imho
>>3861909>>3862396>>3862397F glass, interesting sensor AND based Nikon ergonomics, can't loose
What does /p/ think about IG feeds that are all colour graded the same? I see it all the time. Some call it a style or aesthetically pleasing but making all your pics look the same for that purpose stifles creativity in my opinion. Life is full of colours, yet some IG feeds only consist of three.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAndroid RP1A.200720.012.G986BXXS6DUBAImage-Specific Properties:Image Width1440Image Height3200Image OrientationUnknown
>>3859262>An audience is something traditionally artist had after death.What a load of bullshit
>>3859262Whoring for attention is just the norm of the modern internetThat's why I like 4chan still, all of you people are anon and so am I.None of these ig losers are real artists because they compromise their vision for mass appeal, at which point all you have is kitsch
>>3860029>That's why I like 4chan stillMost consistent photographers are tripfags, we have several IG threads and the rest of the boards are filled with attention whores, what are you talking about.
>>3860032tripfags have always been a thing, this is why most people run addons to forcibly anon everyone
Test
So ive been shooting only film for like 5 years now. I love it but its getting expensive and my canon f1 has once again broken down. I still love it and will continue to shoot film but I think I'm gonna finally get a digital camera. I mainly wanna use it for travel, road trips, and backpacking camping trips in the sierras. O dont want a big clunky dslr or id just take my slr with me so I've been looking at the fujifilm xt-4 but ive recently came across a good deal on a sony a7III. Which would u recommend. I love the look of the fujifilm but is the full frame sensor on the Sony really better??
>>3861758You stated it as a fact. Had you said "I think you'll be happier with an x-t4" you'd have a point.
>>3861761I see. Yes, I think he would be happier with the x-t4. This is my subjective opinion.
Depends, what's your budget OP ? Do you want to buy new or used ?
>>3861932If its in good conditions im good with used but also 2k for them new isnt gonna set me back on any bills But after researching a bit for the last week I think those are my 2 options. I liked the idea of the prox-3 but I dont wanna lose video capabilities especially for a higher price. Ive only found the prox3 more expensive than the xt4 But yeah if u have any other cameras in the 2k range for body and basic zoom lens let me know. >>3861932
>>3861645Nikon df
is this good?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4032Image Height3024Scene Capture TypeStandard
Why did you take this photograph? What did you see in this scene?I'm not asking that to insult you, it's just that I can't tell why you thought this scene was special, or what's special about this photograph. Try thinking about what makes a scene special before photographing it. If you liked the colors of the sky, try minimizing distractions (in this case, the silhouettes in the foreground) to draw the viewer's attention to the sky. If you liked the silhouettes, there isn't really anything unique about them; nothing about them draws my eye either. Find an angle that better pronounces the silhouettes of the buildings if you can and try again.There's also the issue of high noise, but that's more technical, and I think the main problem is composition. You can take a good photograph with any camera.
>>3855483i see no talent
>>3858001based, 3:2 masterracefuck 4:3 contrarians
>>3855483Better than another gear thread, but no.
it's a cell*one pic
Should i just get an xpan or a MF camera and just crop in?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePakon, IncCamera ModelF135_PLUSCamera SoftwareCapture One 20 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Width2941Image Height1086
>>3861557How are xpan cameras prone to breaking ?
>>3862342By giving up the ghost.
>>3862347?
>>3859960holy shit. what's the setup? For scanning too
>>3859733I've noticed that normal framed cropped to be panoramic usually has this very uncanny "crop" look.Here's an example, excuse the kpop.https://youtu.be/0It6vWbGOX0
Is F-mount dying to Z-mount[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Yeah and afterwards Z-mount will maybe have 10% of market share F-mount once had and Nikon will die altogether. It's over for them, lost the race to Canon and Snoy
Well I hope so, I mean they gotta use that bigger hole in the camera for something
>>3862248Did they really, though? I don't know anybody who actually shoots Canon. Sony, yes, Nikon, yes.
>>3862243Yes, in the sense that they will quit making and designing new f mount lenses. However, that means that high quality f mount stuff can be had for cheap on the used market.
>>3862391Great I want a 135mm f2 dc nikkor
Whats the best camera for $200 to take pictures at night?
>>3860774Show me a better body for night photography for £300.Inb4 you recommend a DSLR for night photography like some fucking moron that's never shot a camera in his life.
>>3859282Correct.
>>3859132I agree with this dude. I bought a a7 first gen this year mad happy with it. No mirror slap so handheld withouth any effort up to 1/20 1/10 using a 50mm anyway and acceptable iso up to about 32000 but best at 1000 or below pair it with my cannon nfd 1.2 and im happy out.
>>3858994Take a look at the compacts from ~2013 like the RX1 Mark II or canon G1X Mark II.I would not recommend DSLRs as the lenses alone come close to $200 for a decent one. >>3859132Hearty chuckle
>>3862659Correction: I meant RX100.
What would be the best choice as my first ever DSLR ? Is it worth paying more for the d7000 if I won't notice the difference as an amateur ?I plan to use that with the 35mm f1.8g lens
Similar situation to you, got picrel (make sure you get an included charger, those are $100 alone).
>>3858819Used D610 with a low shutter count
>>3858819Used K-3
>>3858819Could choice of lens, it's my go to after 10 years (and I've gone ultra wide and tele).I have D5100 and it has the same sensor as the D7000, which is stella btw. 2011 Sony sensor which produces lovely looking RAW files with lots of latitude in post. Get the D7000. IF it's not for you sell it and get your money back. In terms of features and functions you will have more to learn, however, it will give you more control.
Nikon D40$100-$200
Some of my shots from a local protest. comments/criticisms/advice?
>>3862000>attacking the capitol of the country you reside in with the intent to kidnap, injure or kill the highest members of public officeDo NPCs really believe this?
>>3856001Needs to be cropped, the blacks are too black, bring them up. The power lines are distracting>>3856004boring and the sky is clipped>>3856006the subject(the girl) is out of focus and sky is clipping again>>3856008I like this one. The blacks are too dark and the sky is clipping>>3856011easily my favorite. I would have moved to left just a tad so the dude in the suit's sign could be seen. Again, the blacks need to raised and the sky is clipping.
>>3856315>Looks like Vancouver.it is, the signs are for yaletown
>>3862000They only entered the capitol because the doors were opened to them lol
>>3862406>be American>enter a open door at the capitol>get shot
No display. Only the interface appears, but no image. What might be the problem?
>>3860030One that came with it>>3860001It is>>3859993Yes, it takes photos
>>3860040Well, just tell us the markings then.
>>3859981I have same cam. lcd problem?
Probably no sensor readout.
Have you removed lenscap?
