[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]

[Catalog] [Archive]

File: IMG_3249.jpg (20 KB, 701x438)
20 KB
20 KB JPG
What happened to all the hype?

A few years ago every photographer was talking about this brand, now it’s gone silent.

What camera brand should I be getting hyped about now?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width701
Image Height438
Scene Capture TypeStandard
35 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4306753
Fuck that noise brah. Buy a Nikon, install capture one. You'll be glad you're invested in superior FF/crop MF sized Z mount when tech from RED starts trickling into Nikon bodies.
>>
>>4307048
what tech from red exactly mate? swamp colours? $2k for a modular handle?
>>
>>4307050
21 stop dr? Global shutter?
>>
stopped caring when the a6700 released since it wasn't too different/groundbreaking from my a6600. the a9iii looks cool but ill wait for the trickle down for the global shutter if it ever happens.
>>
>>4306753
>what camera brand should i be getting hyped about now?

whichever one /p/ is complaining about the most

File: mike_sundaygr3x.jpg (233 KB, 982x1547)
233 KB
233 KB JPG
what do you think the custom recipe mike_sunday used on these? he's not telling in the comments. gotta respect the hustle

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
8 replies and 3 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4306499
>>4306500
>>4306502
>>4306503
I've never been to Japan. Japan seems nice.

however all these Japanfags who idolize this place (especially in photography circles) make me never want to go there. kys
>>
>>4307077
>click the profile
>it's some fat literal midget 5 foot tall asian 40 year old wearing teenagers clothes
wtf is this lmaaaaaaaaoooooooooooo
>>
>>4307077
>LOOKS TO ME LIKE
Stopped reading
>>
>>4306499
>>4306500
>>4306502
>>4306503
looks absolutely nothing like film at all, not even an attempt. bait post
>>
>>4306499
i like it

Are there any anons here practicing erotic photography? How do you find your models willing to pose for such photos? Or do you have to pay them?
2 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4307799
man here is living my fucking dream.

godspeed you bastard
>>
What are the best lenses for photographing tits?
Telephoto from afar or wide angle up close?
>>
>>4307830
35mm is the best boob focal length.
>>
>>4307832
https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=9753104
Bikini art, not NSFW (site may be though)
On the left would I need a 20 or 24 or something to capture that?
I assume top right would be 50-135 territory?
Would 35mm work for the bottom right? (Camera held above head looking down at subject from a few feet away)
>>
>>4307839
>16-35 f4
>high res ff camera with good apsc mode
You dont need more

File: DSC06790.jpg (303 KB, 2048x1365)
303 KB
303 KB JPG
Let's see some cars and bikes.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-6700
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2024:04:04 04:55:49
Exposure Time1/160 sec
F-Numberf/4.5
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating50
Lens Aperturef/4.5
Brightness8.4 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceDaylight
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2048
Image Height1365
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Unique Image ID844286f49e2d04330000000000000000
65 replies and 54 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4306007
don't beat yourself up, go out and shoot too!
and thank you all for the feedbacks
I'm not a cars guy (neither in knowledge nor in photos) but sometimes they're truly beautiful to shoot. I gotta get more familiar with it, though
>not sure if picrel fits in the thread, but it's a vehicle photo and I love it so fuck it
>>


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width2326
Image Height1550
>>
>>4306314
gay and microdick-pilled
>>
File: DSC03026.jpg (1.19 MB, 2048x1365)
1.19 MB
1.19 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-6700
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.5
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)105 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2024:04:22 00:21:43
Exposure Time1/80 sec
F-Numberf/6.3
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating125
Lens Aperturef/6.3
Brightness6.8 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceCloudy Weather
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length70.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
>>4306504
Hit a speed bump?

File: 1711694258276799.jpg (23 KB, 824x1024)
23 KB
23 KB JPG
have you ever caught something unexplainable on a photo?
>>
>>4307722
Define unexplainable

I cannot even explain how my color film works
>>
>>4307756
/x/-tier

File: _DSC8107.jpg (1.16 MB, 1367x2048)
1.16 MB
1.16 MB JPG
Ansel Adams used to tilt the plate is his cameras in order to get his entire photo in focus at once, regardless of the depth of field. Now we all just go to the highest f stop value possible and shoot for the best. Alternatively some with set up with a tripod, and take 10 photos of the same exact scene with different focus points, and blend them all into one picture in photoshop. Others hate the concept and prefer a visual reference to the depth of field with an area clearly in focus and an area that is clearly not. This then begs the question, is focus better long range or up close?
I played around with the concept a bit. I took two pictures, one just as far back as possible, and then another on the close foreground. I did this trying to see which style I liked better. Personally I like the foreground in focus, but the other person I asked preferred the shot with the background in focus.

so what do you guys think? do you have a preference? Or do you like the Incel Adams "everything in focus" approach?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D610
Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 7.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern850
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2024:04:21 14:20:47
Exposure Time1/4000 sec
F-Numberf/4.0
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating800
Lens Aperturef/4.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeSpot
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
Comment452942
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeLandscape
Gain ControlLow Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
15 replies and 3 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: txp70mm (5).jpg (1.17 MB, 1995x2543)
1.17 MB
1.17 MB JPG
>>4307521
Look at what is achievable using a 4x5 camera! Isn't this simply remarkable?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera ModelPerfection V800
Equipment MakeEPSON
Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width10392
Image Height13184
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2024:04:10 07:36:59
Color Space InformationsRGB
Light SourceUnknown
>>
>>4307372
Thanks man I appreciate the feedback
>>
>>4307374
Go be a gay faggot somewhere else
>>
>>4306392
go to f8, don't need to make the foreground that blurry, it gets distracting then
>>
>>4306391
both shots are shit but the first one is WAY BETTER than the second one.

second shot with everything in focus is too busy especially in your case where every fucking thing in the image is the same color, same shape and all bunched up together. only an artless retard would prefer the second shot over the first one

File: 1713804582233311.jpg (56 KB, 480x602)
56 KB
56 KB JPG
How do I take a pic of someone with a bright sky and some landmark behind them?
Either the person gets dark or the sky overblown.
9 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4307750
>1 light flash invariably looks like shit.
you're never gonna support a growing family with attitude, son
https://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/fill-flash.htm
>>
>>4307789
1 light flash does invariably look like shit

The single worst gear purchase of my life is buying a single strobe and a medium sized softbox. It looks like shit as is, so you have to at least add a reflector as a kicker. But it still looks like shit then, and everyone taking the aritifically lit photos i like has a second strobe as the kicker, not a reflector, another diffusion panel in front of the main light's 80" softbox, a backlight, and lights on the background - i don't have a studio so I don't have a background.

I ended up never using it because I don't have a studio. You can get far better aesthetics by placing people in front of windows or under trees.
>>
>>4307765
>mft users have girlfriends and practice proper camera technique to extract max quality per image taken
Can't argue with either of those points, darn
>>
>>4307793
>mft users have girlfriends
had, she left for chad when he took a better pic on his fuji with DRO400 turned on and sent it to his instax printer
>>
File: 61uhMc8Lx5L._AC_SL1500_.jpg (110 KB, 1488x1462)
110 KB
110 KB JPG
>>4307794
have again, she came back for the thermal printer

File: kkk.png (661 KB, 2036x1145)
661 KB
661 KB PNG
Why is it that when I film in higher resolutions, the colors become much different (better, more natural looking).

I have a sonya6400, and the 4k footage has tremendously bette colors than 1080p footage. And I now just got a new gopro, and I see the same pattern. 4k has much better (more natural) colors than 1080p, and 5,3k is even better than 4k.

I've also tried youtubing some resulotion comparison videos on the same camera (with the same settings), and it's the same. Higher quality nearly always produces better and more natural colors.

What the hell is going on? I would like to not be limited to the highest possible resolution, but I just cannot unsee how bad the colors look on 1080p.
3 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4303637
this. 100 mb/s vs 24 mb/s
>>
>>4303613
bigger color spaces
>>
File: rx100iii a6400.png (503 KB, 863x378)
503 KB
503 KB PNG
>>4303613
as the other posters said, better bit rate, better color space (4k 4:2:0 is the equivalent of 1080p 4:4:4), most if not all Sony APS-C 4K capable cams lineskip 1080p instead of downsampling. Here is a comparison between the a6400 and the RX100III which doesn't line skip.
>>
So this is why on cameras that have only 1080p video, the video looks worse than stills from the same camera downsized to the same resolution?
>>
It depends on how the camera records the 4k, bitrate, etc

Sometimes recording 4k with a 1.5x crop actually looks better because it downsamples instead of lineskips. There are a lot of quirks to be aware of, but thankfully, you only have one or two cameras so you can learn the ideal video settings for what you do in 5 minutes and just never touch them. For me it's 4k30p max quality in DX mode with auto ISO on. I just never touch that shit. Exposure mode goes to manual, 180 degree reule, I flick the video switch, I get nice movies SOOC.

Dear god, even Gerald is Dunking on Fuji onions. Why don't these people realize that they aren't 'misunderstood', they are just unlikable pretentious cunts on a budget since they'd all desperately like to shoot Lecia instead.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ngqu_qZSLV8&t=450s
259 replies and 32 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4294355
>see work taken with a Fuji that looks great
>see “work” taken with a Fuji that looks like ass
>get a snoy instead
>>
>>4299772
The 40 isn't f1.4
>>
Apparently this camera has the AF speed of an olympus epl-1 and makes a whirr noise so you cant shoot video without an external mic.

Near-$2k camera and they call actual good ones “fool frame” because they dont look girly and fit in purses… cant even shoot video with autofocus. Techs behind a $500 canon dslr.

>>4304902
Fujislugs hate wedding photography because its essentially creepy street snapping with a paycheck (and their mortal enemy, quality standards)
>>
>>4307749
The X100s, like most faux-retro shit, have always been scameras that only have real appeal to professional photographers that already have 50 wunderboxes and are developing PTSD and antisocial tendencies after dealing with too many clients. The more conscious they are of gear, the more they like it. If they are very anti-gear as a spiritual/moral principle they will have no interest in fuji, or leica, etc and just put a pancake lens on their usual camera when going out to f/8 and be there.

This is not a camera a normal person who is also a photographer would love. This is a camera only an experienced photographer with issues would love.
>>
Fuji is missing out on massive profits from bringing back and selling film stocks. If they released a simple film version of this camera and priced it below 500$ it would sell like peanuts, and just like their instax cameras the money would come from the film sales.

File: 1611352108926.jpg (13 KB, 440x475)
13 KB
13 KB JPG
>shoot weddings
>be a photographer ""influencer"" & sell presets
are these the only two ways to make money with photography anymore?
24 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4307316
thats one of the biggest reality check bombs about life that ive seen and it happened right here on one of the most degenerate internet forums

nice
>>
>>4307355
>making money
>photojournalism

please, son...
>>
>>4306549
not in my experience, the baby photographer dresses and handles the baby besides the diaper stuff. You also gotta be willing to put up with young kids which is a rarity especially amongst this board and its endless wall of social inepts.
>>
>>4307561
Thinking some ugly demon that smells like spoiled milk and ketchup is tolerable doesn't mean you have good social skills, it just means you're probably a woman or just have no taste. Dealing with other peoples children has prevented many people from starting their own families and realizing it's only other peoples kids that suck.
>>
>>4307355
if you want to slave away for 12 hours a day and then some more on your PC when you get some, all for $900 - $1300 a month, then sure, go ahead, be a photojournalist

File: IMG_2024-04-22-115301.jpg (1.94 MB, 3000x2250)
1.94 MB
1.94 MB JPG
Besides /p/ is there any good forums where people actually post pictures they take and give feedback instead of shitpost? Is there any that aren’t ban-heavy for anything slightly right of Mao?

>pic related
>me taking a photo of Mt Rainier

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeApple
Camera ModeliPhone 15 Pro
Camera Software17.4.1
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)77 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2024:04:19 20:06:38
Exposure Time1/99 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating80
Lens Aperturef/2.8
Brightness5.5 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeSpot
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length9.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3000
Image Height2250
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
36 replies and 6 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4307490
Forums are just 4chan but everyone is afraid of being banned or judged by obsessed post history reading losers. You dont get any spicy opinions outside of the consensus of the circlejerk. Some like mu-43 or the m43 section on dpreview are extra bad because the circlejerk itself is delusional gearfags. My dad fell in with them and when he got his om1 he returned it because the photos were all noisy shit. He accused mu-43 of lying to him and the mod banned him for a month with a link to topaz AI’s purchase page. Now he has a nikon z50 and the kit lens and he’s talking about buying the 28-400 and a z5
>>
>>4307500
>spicy opinions
That is all you get on /p/, mostly unqualified, and if you question them the critic gets butt hurt.
>>
>>4307697
to be honest when meeting in real life you get the same shit as in here
>it would be neat if you cropped that photo just a little bit
>but I like it this way
every interaction is like this

want good, sincere criticism?
enroll in a good photography school

t. I've spent four years studying photography at a nice prestigious school
>>
The pentax forums are a great resource, though a bit boomer tinted. I really like the lens database they have, and the monthly photo comps are fun, though it's a bit lame when people enter literal 17yo pictures cause they dig through their library to find one that matches the theme, instead of going out and shooting something new in the month they have.
>>
>>4307729
>every lens ever is tack sharp
>source: sharpening slider
>pentax numba one!

File: 400L.jpg (681 KB, 2048x2048)
681 KB
681 KB JPG
Please share your images taken with long focal lengths.
>i bought pic related last week
300mm FF equivalent or longer only.
NO test shots of street furniture thankyou, only images you left the house to shoot.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.8.22
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution350 dpi
Vertical Resolution350 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2048
Image Height2048
205 replies and 110 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4300238
how old? they started single coating in the 60s as far as I'm aware
>>
>>4307645
It was apparently used during WWII, so 40s at the latest
>>
>>4307651
hmmm apparently coatings were invented in 1935 but didn't get popular in Europe until after the war with Zeiss T* but wasn't common in Japan until the 60s... you know we kinda nuked and occupied them and all that. So I doubt it has any, and explains the very white veiling flare. 914mm-fag pls take a photo facing away from the sun/light, i'm curious. Where was it made???
>>
File: _DSC9696.jpg (954 KB, 3238x2160)
954 KB
954 KB JPG
>>4307659
Mine isn't branded but it looks very similar to ones listed as Dallmeyer (although those also don't say that on them, so not sure where the sellers are getting that info from) and those would be British. It was very overcast that day so that's about as good as it's gonna get. Here's the best photo I could get of the inside of the front element, the darker regions being what appears to be the coating that has been rubbed away towards the centre of the lens and then in patches where fungus possibly was.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-7RM3
Camera SoftwareILCE-7RM3 v3.10
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)91 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution350 dpi
Vertical Resolution350 dpi
Image Created2024:04:26 03:41:07
White Point Chromaticity0.3
Exposure Time1/40 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating12800
Brightness-3.6 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length91.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width3238
Image Height2160
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
>>4307612
helicopters have engines

File: vidgen nikon red.jpg (125 KB, 998x1103)
125 KB
125 KB JPG
Redkon edition

All video related questions and discussion is intended for this thread. Here we discuss techniques, gear and anything else related to capturing video footage. Please don't pretend to be an expert if you don't know what you're talking about. Kindly leave your ego at the door.
Posting short films/scripts or other work you've done is encouraged.
We tend to use and recommend DSLRs/mirrorless cameras because they provide phenomenal picture quality for their price, have large sensors (ie the same size used in high-end cinema cameras and higher) and have interchangeable lenses.
In contrast, consumer camcorders often have much smaller sensors and a fixed lens.

>STICKY -https://textbin.net/evqhpcl2jy
>Helpful guide, additional books and more in-depth FAQs - https://web.archive.org/web/20200926115310/https://pastebin.com/kG0gRmTZ

>NO ONE CARES WHAT AN EXPERT YOU THINK YOU ARE. IF YOU’RE ASKING BASIC-AS-SHIT QUESTIONS, YOU CAN’T BE ALL THAT GREAT. SEE ABOVE

Previous thread >>4273759

Quick FAQS

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
313 replies and 31 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4307804
that blue is really pretty, 3CCD still proves itself as the king of all sensor combos. I guess it was just minutes after sunset, right?
>>
>>4307470
3CCD master race
>>
>>4307808
Yeah just as the sun went down
>>
Bump limit reached, new thread
>>4307820
>>4307820
>>
>>4307802
looks like old skate/bmx videos

File: DSC09342)b.jpg (971 KB, 1165x1455)
971 KB
971 KB JPG
I photograph stuff, I'll post some stuff, first photos that I like, then portraits and other stuff.
99 replies and 57 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4302876
The boys looking hard AF
>>
>>4302848
nice
>>
>>4304220
What's your @?
>>
>>4302842
I adore the depth in this one. Will you drop the exif for it? Praying you're still checking the thread Romanianbro
>>
Very nice photos...i really like the framed ones and the silhouette ones.Id love to post some of mines too!

File: dt_DSCF0360.jpg (2.67 MB, 3230x1615)
2.67 MB
2.67 MB JPG
digishit thread
hashtag dst thistime version

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelFinePix E900
Camera Softwaredarktable 4.6.1
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Maker Note Version0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2024:03:15 16:30:45
Exposure Time1/220 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating800
Lens Aperturef/5.7
Brightness5.1 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length28.80 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3230
Image Height1615
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
SharpnessNormal
White BalanceAuto
Chroma SaturationNormal
Flash ModeOff
Macro ModeOff
Focus ModeAuto
Slow Synchro ModeOff
Picture ModeUnknown
Continuous/Bracketing ModeOff
Blur StatusOK
Focus StatusOK
Auto Exposure StatusOK
111 replies and 70 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: DSCF3474.jpg (966 KB, 2272x1704)
966 KB
966 KB JPG
can't believe i wasted $40 on this piece of shit

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelFinePix S5100
Camera SoftwareDigital Camera FinePix S5100 Ver1.00
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Maker Note Version0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2024:04:24 13:24:06
Exposure Time1/250 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating64
Lens Aperturef/5.7
Brightness8.8 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length7.50 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2272
Image Height1704
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
SharpnessNormal
White BalanceAuto
Chroma SaturationNormal
Flash ModeOff
Macro ModeOff
Focus ModeAuto
Slow Synchro ModeOff
Picture ModeManual Exposure
Continuous/Bracketing ModeOff
Blur StatusOK
Focus StatusOK
Auto Exposure StatusOK
>>
File: 20240424_104931.jpg (1.14 MB, 2272x1704)
1.14 MB
1.14 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon PowerShot G3
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height1704
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created1980:01:01 00:00:42
Vertical Resolution180 dpi
Horizontal Resolution180 dpi
Image Width2272
Lens Aperturef/8.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Height1704
White BalanceManual
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
Exposure Time1/200 sec
FlashNo Flash
F-Numberf/8.0
Image Width2272
Focal Length7.19 mm
Metering ModePattern
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Light SourceUnknown
>>
File: IMG_0151.jpg (1.14 MB, 2272x1704)
1.14 MB
1.14 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon PowerShot G3
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height1704
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created1980:01:01 00:00:13
Vertical Resolution180 dpi
Horizontal Resolution180 dpi
Image Width2272
Lens Aperturef/4.5
Exposure Bias0 EV
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Height1704
White BalanceManual
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
Exposure Time31/5000 sec
FlashNo Flash
F-Numberf/4.5
Image Width2272
Focal Length7.19 mm
Metering ModePattern
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Light SourceUnknown
>>
File: van.jpg (601 KB, 1200x800)
601 KB
601 KB JPG
Fujifilm FinePix J20.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelFinePix J20
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelFinePix J20
Camera SoftwareDigital Camera FinePix J20 Ver1.01
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.1
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width3648
Image Height2432
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2024:04:26 11:58:22
Image Width2432
Image Height3648
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2024:04:26 10:17:55.000000
Exposure Time1/250 sec
F-Numberf/10.6
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating400
Lens Aperturef/10.4
Brightness2.6 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length11.20 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3371
Image Height2247
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
>>4302138
I don't trust anyone in this city anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.