[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
06/20/16New 4chan Banner Contest with a chance to win a 4chan Pass! See the contest page for details.
[Hide] [Show All]


[Catalog] [Archive]

File: roof.png (653 KB, 897x595)
653 KB
653 KB PNG
here is a picture i took on a multistorey carpark, hope you like it
>>
i don't

File: 1589745173253.jpg (409 KB, 4898x3265)
409 KB
409 KB JPG
Edit posted images. Post images you wish to see edited.

Link to a RAW file if you can, or post high quality unedited jpeg. Edits can be uploaded in smaller file sizes.

>previously on /Editing/: >>3652930

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 5D Mark IV
Camera SoftwarePicasa
Firmware VersionFirmware Version 1.0.4
Lens NameEF85mm f/1.4L IS USM
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationLeft-Hand, Bottom
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2017:06:20 00:44:16
Exposure Time1/60 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/2.8
Exposure Bias0 EV
FlashFlash, Compulsory
Focal Length85.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width4898
Image Height3265
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Unique Image ID3d4780b60399cf390000000000000000
GPS Satellites0
GPS StatusMeasurement Interoperability
Geodetic Survey DataWGS-84
Exposure ModeProgram
Focus TypeAuto
Metering ModeEvaluative
SharpnessUnknown
SaturationNormal
ContrastNormal
Shooting ModeManual
Image SizeLarge
Focus ModeOne-Shot
Drive ModeUnknown
Flash ModeExternal Flash
Compression SettingFine
Macro ModeNormal
White BalanceAuto
Exposure Compensation3
Sensor ISO Speed160
Color Matrix129
30 replies and 11 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: ed2.jpg (3.01 MB, 2639x1759)
3.01 MB
3.01 MB JPG
>>3662538
I agree with this anon, decide where you wanna put the focus, either on the sky, or on the foreground, and actively give it a bigger part of the scene.
Right now it feels kinda neither here or there.
I made two quick 3:2 crops to show what i mean.
Here is more focus on sky

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 21.0 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width3072
Image Height2048
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2020:05:29 02:46:37
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2639
Image Height1759
>>
File: ed1.jpg (2.12 MB, 2244x1496)
2.12 MB
2.12 MB JPG
>>3662560
And here is more focus on the road (you do need to brighten up the landscape a bit if you wanna put focus on it, and I brightened the road a bit more to guide the eye).

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 21.0 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width3072
Image Height2048
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2020:05:29 02:45:08
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2244
Image Height1496
>>
File: ed3.jpg (2.09 MB, 1568x1960)
2.09 MB
2.09 MB JPG
>>3662561
If you do not mind to change the format though, I like this 5:4 crop the most, it seems to suit the flow of the image the most.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 21.0 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width3072
Image Height2048
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2020:05:29 02:50:27
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1568
Image Height1960
>>
>>3662558

You're the result of participation trophy parenting.
>>
>>3662561
That's all wrong. Saturated red sky only works when it's alone. For foreground, you need to do different edits. Lift shadows, drop highlights. There's enough dynamic range in source jpg to allow it.

>>3662563
When are you going to edit it?

Pic not related
>>
>>3661639
Ah, it's been a while since I've spammed this one.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeXiaomi
Camera ModelMI 6
Camera SoftwareLightroom
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)52 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created2019:03:18 14:13:05
Exposure Time1/620 sec
F-Numberf/2.6
Exposure ProgramNot Defined
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/2.6
Brightness7.2 EV
Metering ModeAverage
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length6.06 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
>>
File: meema.jpg (1.19 MB, 2000x1333)
1.19 MB
1.19 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-6000
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width5535
Image Height3690
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2020:05:28 19:54:15
Exposure Time1/100 sec
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating250
Brightness0.2 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2000
Image Height1333
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
>>3662514
What percentage of the actual photo did you crop out?
>>
>>3662567
>>3662514
Never mind, it was taken with a phone

Anyone remember this?
https://www.blurb.com/bookshare/app/index.html?bookId=6074398
27 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3662094
A tripfag
>>
>>3662094
can someone post a photo, id like to see
>>
>>3660474
>Chad P Anus II
>>
>>3662077
Chosis was ultimately another fraud who never cared about photography in the first place. All he wanted to do was creep on 13 year old girls around schools and run shitty '90s era scams on 4chan/reddit.

He had no real passion for the art of photography or any love for the craft. Hence why he's completely given up on photography now after only two years and probably sold his camera to buy some bathtub heroin & some dark web CP (gotta keep reviewing those CP websites on reddit!).
>>
>>3662550
Source for any of this stuff? Do you have their reddit account? Or screenshots of these scams.
I would like to see

File: instant.png (186 KB, 400x400)
186 KB
186 KB PNG
nobody will ever see your photos edition

Old thread: >>3654194
All analog/film photography related questions and general discussion is to take place in this thread.
35mm, 120, medium format, large format, instant, polaroid, instax, C41, E6, B&W, developing, scanning, labs, darkroom etc.
Post photos as often as possible, we want to see that beautiful grainy goodness!

useful links:
http://istillshootfilm.org/beginners-guide-film-photography
https://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.php
http://industrieplus.net/dxdatabase

>posting in /fgt/ doesn't make you gay, but what does sexuality even mean if you never interact with other humans
242 replies and 72 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3662448
>>3662449
kinda reminds me of when you try to scan B&W film on a plustek with the IR channel activated. the silver on the film reflects light and fucks up the dust removal algorithm, resulting in software rendering pics almost exactly like that.
>>
>>3662369
>Would pulling be the way to go?
In one word, yes.
>>
>>3662369
I mean it’s also the Mohave so like, I feel like waiting for less contrast light before changing processing.
>>
>>3662448
>>3662449

This >>3662501
No way that's on the film. You're fucking up scanning somehow. What software are you using? This could be either trying to use dust removal, or degrain, or some shit like "adaptive contrast" that Silverfast has.
>>
>>3662511
These were shot between late afternoon and sunset on a (relatively) cloudy day. The first pic with the shrub is the earliest of the three and the closeup of the yucca plant was the last (maybe 30 minutes till the stars came out). Given what >>3662445 mentioned though is it possible I might've shot the film ok but blown it out in production?

File: unnamed.jpg (63 KB, 512x512)
63 KB
63 KB JPG
I want to expand my knowledge of photographers and I figured you fine folk here on /p/ might have some recommendations for me. I really like Nobuyoshi Araki and Vivian Maier, but those are the only two who's work I'm even remotely familiar with. I've always been into macabre, mystical illustrations with occult undertones (i.e., William Blake, Virgil Finlay, Gustave Moreau) but I'll take any recs. Just share a picture from your favorite photographer.
67 replies and 38 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3659686
These photos scream “ I let composition and frame splitting dictate the image”
In a boring predictable way.
>>
>>3662476
Might as well look at Justine kurlands work while you're at it
>>
>>3662507
He uses third worlders like backdrops for uninspiring photos that have no merit when you consider its so self serving for a supposed “journalist”. His whole schtick was he used kodakchrome and he got btfo a few years back for manipulating his digishit images.
>>
>>3662505
>>3662515
Steve McCurry quite nicely fits into the canon for the era he was shooting in. Don't hate on him so hard. Sure to the modern viewer it's a bit of an eye roll but you have view his earlier work within the context of when it was made. He was active before the internet era when such images have become too ubiquitous. His main mode of publishing was National Geographic which communicated and displayed cultures and locations foreign to the general American populous. To see similar images during that time period relied on books and the odd cinema/tv show. Look at movies made during his childhood and early career. For example Around the World in 80 days (1954) whose first half was used a to show case cultures that wouldn't be normally seen by American audiences. Those show case scenes are hard/tedious to watch these days because that kind of imagery and information is now easily available.

If you scroll up and look at my original response to the post about McCurry my issue with him is that he's had a hard time adjusting to that shift making his newer work much less interesting and relevant.
>>
>>3658206
check out vivian maier

File: 000112.jpg (74 KB, 1002x792)
74 KB
74 KB JPG
Why is there such a difference in price?
59 replies and 6 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3662519
it’s called completely irrelevant butthurt anon
>>
>>3659006
50s has articulating screen
view finder can be removed/ also articulates a bit
has top LCD

its kinda like a fuji x-t # series vs an X-E#
similar photos imo but the extra goodies come at an added cost. sometimes a bit too much in this case.
>>
>>3662524
>give an example of another technology that has a paradigm shift which results in shifting definitions of vaguely defined terms
>this is somehow irrelevant
Please, you are just embarrassing yourself
>>
>>3662529
You aren’t even replying to the same person lol you’re just buttrustled
>>
>>3662543
Then what is your point even replying, there is a discussion going on on a discussion board, what is the relevance of your butting in?
You don't even seem to understand what is being talked about, that is what is embarrassing.

File: unnamed.jpg (45 KB, 512x256)
45 KB
45 KB JPG
why don't they just make lenses that are 3:2 square-shaped, instead of having all that circle space that is just wasted?
19 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3661922
the REAL question is why don’t they make something the shoots in 4:3 but with better quality than a FF sensor
>>
>>3662385
Olympus I know does.

>>3662387
It's called a fuji.
>>
>>3662385
Higher end nikons can shoot in 5:4 crop which is pretty close
>>
>>3662408
>better quality than FF
>Fuji GFX

You only get once choice today sorry anon
>>
>>3662387
Common digital medium format size

File: DSC_0035.jpg (4.15 MB, 4608x3072)
4.15 MB
4.15 MB JPG
dump your favorite picture youve taken

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D3100
Camera SoftwareVer.1.01
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern848
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2019:08:14 12:56:37
Exposure Time1/200 sec
F-Numberf/10.0
Exposure ProgramNot Defined
ISO Speed Rating400
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length18.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width4608
Image Height3072
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
Scene Capture TypeLandscape
Gain ControlLow Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
ISO Speed Used400
Image QualityFINE
White BalanceAUTO
Focus ModeMANUAL
Flash Compensation0.0 EV
ISO Speed Requested400
Flash Bracket Compensation0.0 EV
AE Bracket Compensation162111488.0 EV
Lens TypeNikon G Series
Lens Range18.0 - 55.0 mm; f/3.5 - f/5.6
Shooting/Bracketing ModeSingle Frame/Off
Noise ReductionOFF
Camera Actuations11023
Digital Vari-ProgramLANDSCAPE
304 replies and 150 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3629487
>i didnt want to risk causing an accident for a photo.
but you took a pic while the car was moving?
>>
>>3629828
shits fucking creepy
nice
>>
>>3659857
you are just pretending to be this retarded, right?
it's like op wasn't the one driving or something
>>
>>3629641
Why did you shoot this portrait when the bridge seems like it would have nicely filled a landscape image? Was it to get the water texture? I want to look at the bridge but for some reason my eye is dawn to the bottom of the frame with the one vertical section of the dark water. Not that I expect a response seeing as how that post is months old.
>>
>>3662427
It was for the water tezture. Honestly I don't like that image as much as I did when I processed it, there are others even from that day and time I like more. I did shoot the bridge in landscape too; would post it here but we are at the bump limit.

File: affordable.jpg (194 KB, 1172x703)
194 KB
194 KB JPG
Have you bought your Ricoh GR, X100V replacement yet?
1 reply and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3662443
>I own both X100V and Coolpix A, love them both. Image quality of the Nikon is great but the autofocus is painfully slow and it lacks a viewfinder. Size is great tho, can fit in the pocket, which is not really possible with the X100V, so both now have a place in my kit.
>>
>>3662441
Sorry Mathias, I dont discuss fiction with strangers
>>
File: R1000072.jpg (479 KB, 1280x847)
479 KB
479 KB JPG
>>3662441
>tfw dust
>fuji GR is literally unusable and also gets dust
how do I free myself from dust

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera ModelGR II
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width1280
Image Height847
Compression SchemeUnknown
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution96 dpi
Vertical Resolution96 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2019:05:26 14:29:04
Exposure Time1/1600 sec
F-Numberf/5.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating280
Lens Aperturef/5.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashFlash, Compulsory
Focal Length18.30 mm
White BalanceAuto
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: 49241211607_a72b095864_o.jpg (330 KB, 2000x1325)
330 KB
330 KB JPG
>>3662470
Just fucking get over it. I've had my GR for seven years now and I took it apart once to clean the sensor. That's how long people on /p/ have been parroting this GR dust meme. Show me the dust spots in this photo. Do they matter?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera ModelGR
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 21.0 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4928
Image Height3264
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2020:05:28 15:08:07
Exposure Time1/160 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Brightness7.3 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length18.30 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2000
Image Height1325
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
>>
>>3662441
>yet
that shit is very old and sucked

File: intel agent student.png (1.02 MB, 1425x475)
1.02 MB
1.02 MB PNG
https://northwestern.campuslabs.com/engage/organization/africanstudentsassociation

FHJS>CMSL<KJDO>

File: 1q8l4.jpg (1.88 MB, 1620x3330)
1.88 MB
1.88 MB JPG
Post photos taken with your Micro Four Thirds camera
Gear photos also accepted

/mtfg/ - Micro Four Thirds general thread anime edition

Old thread over bump limit >>3612000

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution350 dpi
Vertical Resolution350 dpi
172 replies and 36 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3660128
>Why not a Z6?

It's too expensive :(
Not to mention I have like 12 F mount lenses. Getting a Z mount plus adapter pretty much just negates the lightness of a mirrorless camera.

>>3660166
>I like it a lot, but it´s really pretty heavy.

Thats why I decided not to get one. I almost got a D610 last year but decided against it due to the oil spill issues.

>AF-D 35mm f2.0

I have it as well. I bought one last year and I love it. Autofocus might be slow at times but I love the way it goes swish swish as it searches for focus.
>>
File: ads11512338569778.jpg (553 KB, 1000x1000)
553 KB
553 KB JPG
Found these browsing old /p/ folder. Hola if you're still around.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.
Camera ModelE-M5
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.10 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.4
Color Filter Array Pattern804
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2017:12:03 22:57:53
Exposure Time1/60 sec
F-Numberf/3.5
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating800
Lens Aperturef/3.5
Exposure Bias-1.3 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Auto
Focal Length25.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlHigh Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: ads11512338504235.jpg (525 KB, 750x1000)
525 KB
525 KB JPG
>>3662464

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.
Camera ModelE-M5
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.10 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7
Color Filter Array Pattern804
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)30 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2017:12:03 22:57:53
Exposure Time1/80 sec
F-Numberf/4.0
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating4000
Lens Aperturef/4.0
Exposure Bias-1.7 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Auto
Focal Length15.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlHigh Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: ads11512338439484.jpg (252 KB, 750x1000)
252 KB
252 KB JPG
>>3662466

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.
Camera ModelE-M5
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.10 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.4
Color Filter Array Pattern804
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2017:12:03 22:57:59
Exposure Time1/10 sec
F-Numberf/1.4
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating400
Lens Aperturef/1.4
Exposure Bias-0.3 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Auto
Focal Length25.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlLow Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: ads11512338700372.jpg (451 KB, 1000x668)
451 KB
451 KB JPG
>>3662467

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.
Camera ModelE-M5
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.10 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7
Color Filter Array Pattern804
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)30 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2017:12:03 22:58:01
Exposure Time1/500 sec
F-Numberf/4.0
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/4.0
Exposure Bias-0.7 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Auto
Focal Length15.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal

File: 26150692_1_x.jpg (117 KB, 1100x733)
117 KB
117 KB JPG
Leica thread part 3, this shit's getting old edition

Just a chill thread to post photos taken with your Leica and talk about Leica gear.

> Why are you irrationally angry about someone else owning a Leica, /p/?
103 replies and 47 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: P190326-1001154.jpg (378 KB, 1000x665)
378 KB
378 KB JPG
>>3662177
>I should just go and shoot. Dont think just shoot like what Lomography preaches.
It does kinda sound like you're overthinking things a bit. So yeah, just run a few rolls through it and don't stress too much about being "worthy" of the camera.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeLeica Camera AG
Camera ModelM9 Digital Camera
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
F-Numberf/9.5
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating160
Shutter Speed1/3000 sec
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Exposure ModeManual
>>
I just bought a M6 classic with a 0.85x finder. The finder's probably been changed at some point, as the camera has the Leitz logo and AFAIK the 0.85 finder became available a lot later.

Since I shoot a 35mm 99% of the time, what am I in for? It'll be a bit until I get the camera, so I don't know how it will be in practice. FWIW I don't wear glasses. A 0.58 or 0.72 would've been my pick (I'm more likely to get a 28mm than a 50mm next) but I got a good deal with the 0.85 so I thought what the hell.
>>
File: Kentmere 100 005.jpg (697 KB, 1200x800)
697 KB
697 KB JPG
>>3662373
Just wait till you get the camera to see for yourself. You'll answer that question best but from what I know I don't think there's any issue using 35mm on that camera...even with glasses.

Pic unrelated: CV 35/2.5

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeBessa R4A + CV 35/2.5 + Yellow 12
Camera ModelKentmere 100 + HC110 dil B
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2020:05:28 16:13:50
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1200
Image Height800
>>
>>3661010

Based and movement pilled
>>
>>3662415
I wear glasses and I can't see the 35mm framelines completely, and I only have a .72. If you wear glasses, you're fucked for 35mm with a .85.

File: IMG_8193.jpg (2.71 MB, 3024x4032)
2.71 MB
2.71 MB JPG
Hey, /p/

I'm a newfag and been messing around with my camera. What's this line? I can't seem to take it off. Any tip would help.
>>
Welcome to /p/. First things first, consult your camera manual.
>>
>>3662135
Hi, is that video? look int the settings for the aspect ratio and change that to 3:2 (that should be the whole frame)

or look if you have any guides for composition active also in the setting and disable those or change them
>>
>>3662141
No, just a picture. Alright, I'll get to it.
>>
If this is a troll. Fuck you up the ass. If it's isn't. Your camera is in video mode and not photo mode. You're dumb either way.
>>
>>3662135
Lemme see more of them feet anon

File: 1_V7GYJQ_4lykfDzOf9q17eA.jpg (125 KB, 2043x1492)
125 KB
125 KB JPG
Post your grams, get critique, make sure to critique others
64 replies and 28 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3661541
>instagram.com/beckephotos
Way more interesting than the beer shots. Not a huge fan of some of the process, particularly the crushed blacks. It works well enough on a screen but when printed it just looks too washed out.


>>3661556
you IG lays out nicely and the images are decent but none really standout.

>>3661582
that bottom middle one, the hazy train station, is grand

>>3661762
Lol that goat. I would shoot under better lighting. Im knocking out most of my outdoor doggos during golden hour still.

>>3661821

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>
Used to take more but still on lockdown...

https://www.instagram.com/asrawaspossible/
>>
I do nude photography and street shots.

i'll also include my professional website for more photos.

https://www.instagram.com/turnerhaut_photography/
https://www.turnerhaut.com/photography

>>3661500
i love wet plate collodion. your photos look great.

>>3661541
love the mountain photos and the use of hue and contrast.
>>
This is mine. I'm not a professional (yet) but I learn every day to be one one day.
As you can see I love black and white photos. I think much more emotions and feelings can be expressed without colours.

https://instagram.com/bonti.foto?igshid=8alzs220hiqt

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
CommentScreenshot
Image Width634
Image Height818
>>
Here's mine.


Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.