>>4018118
if you're going to shoot portrait you might want to learn how to frame portraits; everything else is pretty good but shit like >>4025464
>>4025463
>>4025966
>>4025967
>>4018123
has lines deviating all around and looks like badly done architecture photography; if there's a suggestion is that you should try to think out composition when shooting people: there's one thing and one thing only that matters in portraiture and that is showing -who- is the person being pictured

>>4028113
how did u do the soft effect? clarity?

>>4030276
I have no idea what you’re asking exactly. I touched up OP’s pic by cropping and raising exposure & colour.

Unless if I assume you are super new, and by soft effect you mean the depth of field then that effect is created by the lens

File: DSC02459.jpg (2.33 MB, 2080x1664)

2.33 MB JPG

>>4029888

File: CUK07871.jpg (2.01 MB, 2080x1601)

2.01 MB JPG

>>4032709

>>4032488
Wouldn't you just use your printer without the negative to get an even exposure instead of waving a torch about.

>>4032491
taking the negative out and moving my easel in the dark sounds a lot harder. I still fuck up the most basic shit while doing this.

It doesnt help that I'm terrified of the dark and my exposure room is infested with bats and mice

File: 1596196843100s.jpg (4 KB, 192x185)

4 KB JPG

>>4032495
>You're posting in the same thread as Dracula

File: 1653072069257.jpg (16 KB, 555x416)

16 KB JPG

can i store rolls of film in my root cellar?
is humidity an issue?

>>4032458
>Anyone have any other ideas?
dont worry about em

File: 1529465711182.jpg (240 KB, 2000x1000)

240 KB JPG

I got a D90 and it's awesome.
I don't give a fuck about the video because it's beyond mega shit anyways.

>>4029754
pure sex

>>4031239
this

File: yes.jpg (36 KB, 375x350)

36 KB JPG

>>4029754
This was my camera for 10 years.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

>>4029754
it was the d7100 for me

File: some fucking chairs.jpg (3.8 MB, 3000x2250)

3.8 MB JPG

Can my subject be nothing at all? I feel obligated to post but didn't want to shit this up with more bloodmoon shit so instead you get a mexican restaurant.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OLYMPUS CORPORATION
Camera Model	E-M5MarkIII
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 5.3 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Color Filter Array Pattern	778
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	34 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2022:05:20 01:06:05
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	-1.3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	17.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Soft

>>4032451
I would have changed the angle so you could see the entire shop front, having that cut off open sign is a major cock tease

File: IMG_3050-Edit.jpg (1020 KB, 1620x1080)

1020 KB JPG

>>4030612
2

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 1200D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.4
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	120 dpi
Vertical Resolution	120 dpi
Image Created	2022:05:10 20:58:20
Exposure Time	1/2 sec
F-Number	f/29.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/29.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	32.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4032451
>Can my subject be nothing at all?

I once posted a nighttime photo of a park on /rpt/. A few people were in the park but they were far off in the background and I said in my post that it lacks subject. However some anon said I should go back and retake it without any people because he prefers it that way. I think during nighttime it can convey a sense of aloneness or stillness. Anyway with lack of subject do you mean lack of people in the photo?

Olympus really have nice colors. Is that SOOC?

>>4032643
>lack of subject
I just wish someone was sitting in those seats

>olympus colors
Yeah I think all I did was decrease exposure a little bit.

>>4030831
Your composition did it

File: Chimneys.jpg (142 KB, 1024x788)

142 KB JPG

Chimneys. Walcot St Bath.
Fujifilm FinePix J20.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: DSC00526.jpg (2.16 MB, 2592x1944)

2.16 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	DSC-P100
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2022:05:18 19:06:22
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Daylight
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	7.90 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2592
Image Height	1944
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Soft
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard

>>4032026
Well what else do you expect from russians

>>4024450
Ask again later.

>>4032024
If you want to leave film lights in a music video at least get some vintage tungsten lights and make it look like it was part of the art design and not just a mistake made by the film crew.

File: IMG_1459.jpg (211 KB, 1200x901)

211 KB JPG

awww yea bros :D
>>4030131

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPod touch
Camera Software	ArcSoft PhotoStudio
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	31 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2022:05:20 23:02:45
Exposure Time	1/33 sec
F-Number	f/2.4
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	125
Lens Aperture	f/2.4
Brightness	3.0 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	3.30 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3264
Image Height	2448
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4024494
i wish u used the first shot for the whole thing so i can just listen to the music

>>4031779
>JJF's "View from a Blue Moon" set the standard for the composition of surfing media
Top notch surfing photography was around long before John Florence.

File: images (3) (7).jpg (73 KB, 454x675)

73 KB JPG

ENTER

John John Florence is also a photographer, iir.

Pretty much, yes, they get it as right as they can. For take picture inside the water, you have to be away from the break, the window you have to take picture is short, and you get what you get. But the surf aesthetic is somehow quite old, from the film era. There are profiles that are still taking perfect surf photos with film today.

other example: football photography, we have our space, it's fixed, we cannot move, or get up, anything, so it's basically what happens when you're are photographing surf, you get what you get, and learn to deal with losing good pictures.

>>4031779
>this specific picture could have been taken differently
He could have gotten his horizon level. He could have gotten the face of the surfer in the shot.
Would that have been hard and mostly up to luck? Sure. But he could have done better.
Let's see you defend your bait.

>>4029206
Best advise imho

>>4029537
post some pictures then fag

>>4029537

Oy you homosexual.

Post some photos.

>>4029537
Glad to hear it but we'd sure appreciate some pics if you're not bound by some copyright nonsense.

>>4028989
> kit zoom
> aps-c
> outdoors

Shoot everything with the maximum focal lemgth of the kit at the maximum aperture and set shutter speed to 1/200

>>4032597
Lol good one. Fuji is king for crop sensor. Other brands just release garbage for soccer moms.

Canon: no lenses. Also probably killing off ef-m mount to consolidate to rf. Will be like Sony.

Sony: no lenses unless you use full frame lenses and that defeats the whole point. Might as well just buy full frame to begin with.

Nikon: no lenses, copied Sony.

>>4032606
Fuji is king for cope sensor.

File: 1653058878403.png (609 KB, 1411x692)

609 KB PNG

>>4032569
>Xpro
>Compact

File: sony_a7c_vs_a7_iii_10.jpg (33 KB, 550x413)

33 KB JPG

>>4032630
bro what do you expect. Most people here havent even seen these cameras in real life, let alone used them. I admit I was a bit shocked myself at the size of the a7 series. Actually Im surprised at most mirrorless sizes, Im used to dslrs.

>>4032644
Yeah, that’s great and all if you want to just use a kit lens but the second you put a big prime or a 70-200, it’s over and it sucks. Sony’s grip also sucks because on some lenses grind your knuckles against the lens…

Don’t understand the obsession with small bodies when most of the weight and size comes from the lenses…

>why does FF vignette and lie about aperture

because they cut corners so they can sell tards on the fool frame lie

mount throat sensor width ratio

m43 38.0mm 17mm 2.23
snoy E 43.6mm 36mm 1.21
canon RF 50.6mm 36mm 1.41
nikon Z 55.0mm 36mm 1.53

File: Untitled-1.jpg (394 KB, 1374x1396)

394 KB JPG

>>4032598
>noise is a concern of mine

Hmm, a fair point, so I went ahead and did the maths for you.

I had to give you the most preferable situation for you, which is that you're having to shoot iso 800 or above wide open, and your copy of the leica lens is a super special one with absolutely zero vignette and a constant t1.4 across the frame.

The areas in red on the vignette chart are the areas that would have less noise on your super special theoretical mft setup after doing vignette correction on the sony lens to make it completely flat. 2.33EV is the cutoff point, 2 stops due to the small sensor, 1/3 of a stop for the f1.4 vs f1.2 lens.

If we use actual aperture equivalence, or the mft lens has it's actual vignette, or you can shoot under iso 800, then the Sony is better across the whole frame for noise after vignette correction. Which made the comparison not very fun.

I'm glad by your own standards you agree that the noise from MFT makes too many photos simply unusable.

>>4032599
>f values aren't real >:(

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>4032629
>muh dynamic range on GH6
literally worse than anything below iso 1000 on an a7riv, see graph here
>>4032632

>>4032631
>I STILL don't understand what aperture is >:(

lmao. by this point I' am 100% certain you just don't have the cognitive ability to understand the most basic of math

>>4032632
you've gotten BTFO so many times it's just sad at this point.
enjoy your "1.2" lenses that act like 3.8 for $2k.

File: Harry Bokeh.jpg (1.13 MB, 1100x1500)

1.13 MB JPG

Daily reminder

You'll be next mudbloods

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	paint.net 4.3.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	96 dpi
Vertical Resolution	96 dpi

>>4030140
this, I can buy X-e2 here for $300-350

>>4027325
i just bought a pentax k-s2 after doing a bunch of research used off of ebay; there are some really good deals on there
i'd recommend looking into one of those

>>4032104
meme, also if you want a good FF in not trashed condition you'll be paying a lot more than that
About $600 for a 2008 5D2 which gets rekt by most crop cameras made after 2012 in low light that you can get for 1/3 of the price.

>>4032295
>if you want a good FF in not trashed condition
Who cares what it looks like as long as the sensor is clean, the buttons work and the shutter count isn't ungodly high?

t. I got my computer case out of a dumpster

> About $600 for a 2008 5D2
You can get a D600 or 610 for considerably less

> meme
cope

I just ordered a 5D mark ii with 70,000 on the shutter for $350. Since the shutter is rated at 150,000, this should last me years.

File: DSC_0759.jpg (645 KB, 1609x1287)

645 KB JPG

>>4032174

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3500
Camera Software	darktable 3.6.0
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.4
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	24908
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	60 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2022:02:17 20:33:24
Exposure Time	1/640 sec
F-Number	f/3.3
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	200
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	40.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1609
Image Height	1287
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Image Quality	RAW
White Balance	AUTO
Focus Mode	AF-A
Flash Compensation	0.0 EV
Flash Bracket Compensation	0.0 EV
AE Bracket Compensation	0.0 EV
Lens Type	Unknown
Lens Range	40.0 mm; f/2.8
Shooting/Bracketing Mode	Single Frame/Off
Noise Reduction	OFF
Camera Actuations	2692

File: DSC_0750.jpg (1.8 MB, 2264x2830)

1.8 MB JPG

>>4032178

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3500
Camera Software	darktable 3.6.0
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	24908
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	60 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2022:05:19 19:52:34
Exposure Time	1/1250 sec
F-Number	f/3.5
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	200
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	40.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2264
Image Height	2830
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Image Quality	RAW
White Balance	AUTO
Focus Mode	AF-A
Flash Compensation	0.0 EV
Flash Bracket Compensation	0.0 EV
AE Bracket Compensation	0.0 EV
Lens Type	Unknown
Lens Range	40.0 mm; f/2.8
Shooting/Bracketing Mode	Single Frame/Off
Noise Reduction	OFF
Camera Actuations	2683

File: DSC_0813.jpg (675 KB, 1883x1506)

675 KB JPG

>>4032182

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3500
Camera Software	darktable 3.6.0
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.9
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	24908
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	60 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2022:05:19 19:53:42
Exposure Time	1/2500 sec
F-Number	f/3.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	40.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1883
Image Height	1506
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Image Quality	RAW
White Balance	AUTO
Focus Mode	AF-A
Flash Compensation	0.0 EV
Flash Bracket Compensation	0.0 EV
AE Bracket Compensation	0.0 EV
Lens Type	Unknown
Lens Range	40.0 mm; f/2.8
Shooting/Bracketing Mode	Single Frame/Off
Noise Reduction	OFF
Camera Actuations	2748

>>4029356
>>4029479
>>4029480
>>4029481
Jumping spiders are so cute :3

File: IMG_6844-1_compress88.jpg (1.85 MB, 6000x4000)

1.85 MB JPG

Found this guy an inch above the carpet on the trim

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	Canon EOS M50
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 11.3.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	JPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Image Orientation	Unknown
Image Created	2022:05:19 20:44:26
ISO Speed Rating	500
Exposure Program	Manual
Color Space Information	sRGB
White Balance	Auto
Rendering	Normal
Metering Mode	Pattern
Exposure Mode	Manual
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
Flash	Flash
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Light Source	Unknown

File: unnamed (5).jpg (38 KB, 600x407)

38 KB JPG

>>4032231
I miss the old WTC.

>>4032619
what happened to it?

>>4032622
israel

>>4032622
whatever you do, do not look up "Lucky Larry Silverstein". Don't do it

File: o-WTC-900.jpg (196 KB, 900x630)

196 KB JPG

>>4032622
see
>>4032624

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.1 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2013:04:21 18:12:28

>>4030401
>The only cope here is from DSLR dinosaurs.
And there it is. Pat yourself on the back for the camera you chose. You're so progressive and special and surely your work is 1,000x better than a dinosaur with a DSLR.

>You will never have blackout free shooting.
Don't care. Blackouts >>>>>> lag and I'm not in the market for an R3 right now, one of only three cameras that don't suffer from continuous shooting EVF lag. It's a great fucking camera and I'm sure it's really nice to shoot with, but what I've got doesn't hinder me from the sports/wildlife/action shots I want at all, so I'm fine.

>the time where the AF sensor is useless.
I don't need it to be useful during blackout as long as it catches up with the mirror down. It does.

>Your DSLR in OVF mode will never even match the Sony A9's (released 2017, updated with eye AF and real time tracking) tracking performance.
Distance tracking? It absolutely matches any mirrorless. Keeping an AF point on the subject? I'm sure letting a computer handle this is convenient but I have no trouble doing it myself.

>You will forever cope and seethe that your outdated tech has been replaced
I couldn't give a fuck. I corrected you on a false technical claim and now you're going off on a butthurt child rant about "muh progress muh dinosaurs!" Who made your mirrorless? Sony? Sony will never love you no matter how many forum posts you make about the vast superiority of your shiny new mirrorless bought on a credit card. You can get a million dinosaurs to switch and you will still die alone. Sony won't be there to hold your hand or tell you that you're loved.

>>4030420
>I corrected you on a false technical claim
Where? This one?
>>4030305
>>autofocus improvements that mirrorless cameras make could be integrated into DSLRs as well
>>Not if you're using the OVF.
>Yes if you're using the OVF. You just need an imaging sensor where the AE sensor would traditionally go.
You cannot get the AF performance of a mirrorless if you are using an OVF with a slapping mirror that prevents AF ~20ms every frame. For the 1DXMIII at max speed this would be 16fps*20ms per second which is 320ms per second where the AF CANNOT function. The R3 can do 60fps AF and tracking calculations per second while the Z9 can do 120fps. A DSLR is PHYSICALLY unable to match this as it wastes ~32% of every second flapping a mirror and is unable to AF during that time. Even if the DSLR can do 200fps AF calculation it still cannot account for the ~32% of info it cannot see due to the mirror flap.

>>4030375
>Admits DSLR is dead & irrelevant
>Tries to claim that features we had 6 years ago on mirrorless might one day come to DSLR
>Thinks af from the 80's works on the same principles as af on a modern DSLR

That about wraps you up bud.

>>4030420
>Ovf = no lag
The shutter lag on a d800 is longer than the shutter lag + evf lag combined on an a7ii, let alone something relevant.

>It is as good at af as mirrorless, no I've never used an a1 or an a9, but I'm sure my dinosaur is better >:(

Yikes, copium.


Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>4030160
Perfection was reached in the D40

>>4030160
Yes, the D850

File: 1608220624228.gif (1.44 MB, 292x292)

1.44 MB GIF

35mm,40mm and da fifty for me

>>4032413
why would you want a 40 if you have a 35

>>4032413
>I want the kit lens experience without the convenience

File: 20220520_162733-01.jpg (344 KB, 1500x2000)

344 KB JPG

Yeah so, for me its: 14-24mm, 28, 35, 45, couple of 50s, 24-70mm, ofc boomer 85mm, the g o a t 105mm and 70-200mm.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G781B
Camera Software	Snapseed 2.0
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	26 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2022:05:20 16:29:57
Exposure Time	1/25 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	1250
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	5.40 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1500
Image Height	2000
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Unique Image ID	X12QSND00YM

>>4032577
nice collection bruv. Get the 135mm dc :)