[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

[Advertise on 4chan]

Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]

[Catalog] [Archive]

Do you ever think about your eyes as a camera? What kind of rendering do your eyes have? What does your eyes bokeh look like? What resolution and DR would you estimate your vision to have?

I have pretty sharp center, but bokeh is kind of distracting. I get a lot of color fringing at the edge of bokeh balls, and lines often just multiply instead of smoothing out. I'm also stsrting to get some horizonthal astigmatism at infinity focus at older age.
33 replies and 4 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3923646
>>3923231

That's simply false...
>>
https://boards.4chan.org/h/thread/62216146308624
>>
>>3922901
god didn't intend for everyone to read
>>
>>3921827
People who think defective biological artifacts developed after millions of years of trial and lots of error are only possible by intelligent design really piss me the fuck off. They could see a near perfect circle in nature and then claim it can only be the work of a god just because humans know what a circle is.
Good fucking god, I'm fuming at this retarded post.
>>
>>3921827
>>3921827
Overdosing on DMT and LSD and shrooms are the only way that you can see this God that you speak of because psychedelics are the flesh of God and abusing psychedelics is a holy act.

File: IMG_20210727_160630__01.jpg (4.66 MB, 4608x3456)
4.66 MB
4.66 MB JPG
I'm trying to get some feelings for photography what do yall think ?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera ModelIN2013
Equipment MakeOnePlus
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4608
Image Height3456
Image Created2021:07:27 16:06:29
Lens Aperturef/2.2
Exposure Bias0 EV
ISO Speed Rating125
White BalanceAuto
Shutter Speed1/1541 sec
Focal Length2.25 mm
FlashNo Flash
F-Numberf/2.2
9 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3923199
It is a rather photography photograph, I'd say.
>>
>>3923198
Good advice
>>
>>3923188
It's a phone and he can't choose the aperture?
>>
>>3923225
>>
>>3923195
Based.
>>3923225
Well op isn't a good photographer at all

File: _DSC4374_01.jpg (4.24 MB, 4928x2772)
4.24 MB
4.24 MB JPG
Mecha-birbs edition.

You know the drill

Previous >>3920901

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareViewNX 2.8 W
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2021:08:03 14:42:35
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width4928
Image Height2772
70 replies and 58 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3924473

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1280
Image Height853
>>
>>3924475

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1280
Image Height853
>>
>>3924476

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1280
Image Height853
>>
>>3924479

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1280
Image Height853
>>
>>3924481

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1280
Image Height853

File: IBIS.jpg (151 KB, 1200x900)
151 KB
151 KB JPG
Previous thread hit bump limit, read it thoroughly before posting >>3909562

To get started, is IBIS similar to OIS in that I should turn it off when I don't need it? i.e. can it induce blur issues with faster shutter speeds?
11 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3923934
This.
>>3923603
Not this. Only do it if you're stupid.
>>
>>6308624
>>
There's a triathlon in my city soon, kinda wanna show up near the start line with my camera and tripod. Is this something that could get me harassed by security? I'd be on public land, less concerned with legality and more if someone will give a fuck about a non-accredited dude with a bigger camera. I know it can be an issue with events at venues like stadiums or race tracks, but this is just in the city.

Alternatively I'll just set up along the route somewhere.
>>
>>3924320
If you're in America they can't do shit, you can take a picture of anything that's in public. Will you get harassed by cops? Maybe, but doing anything will get you harassed by cops.
>>
Why are there never any tele lenses made specifically for APS-C sensors? I've seen some photography influencers mentioning how using a full frame lens on APS-C will lose a great amount of image quality, so why are there no APS-C wildlife/sports lenses and only wide/mid ones? Besides, they would be a lot cheaper, and I would bet plenty of wildlife photographers would use APS-C cameras for the reach.

File: cameraandbox.jpg (30 KB, 480x436)
30 KB
30 KB JPG
Cleaning out my father's garage, I came across this old box of film canisters (not literally this image). Would it be worth it to have it developed or is it garbage from being out in the heat/cold? Also, who even develops film anymore, I went to Walgreens and Walmart and both wanted me to ship it off and I wouldn't get the negatives returned, turn around time was 4 weeks.
9 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: _pdp_sq_.jpg (51 KB, 500x500)
51 KB
51 KB JPG
bump for mommie milky
>>
>>3917446
>>3920319
kek... my champion, keep up the good work
>>
Updates?
>>
I want your mums tits, mate. Deliver.
>>
Bump

File: DJI_0628.jpg (450 KB, 1600x1066)
450 KB
450 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera ModelFC3411
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.3 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)22 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2021:08:03 16:40:59
Exposure Time1/2 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/2.8
Exposure Bias-0.3 EV
Metering ModeAverage
Light SourceDaylight
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length8.38 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
16 replies and 13 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: _1052835.jpg (959 KB, 1067x1600)
959 KB
959 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePanasonic
Camera ModelDC-S1
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.3 (Windows)
PhotographerMARTIN BARON
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2021:08:03 16:41:39
Exposure Time1/200 sec
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating500
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlHigh Gain Up
ContrastSoft
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: _1052519.jpg (835 KB, 1067x1600)
835 KB
835 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePanasonic
Camera ModelDC-S1
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.3 (Windows)
PhotographerMARTIN BARON
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.2
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)35 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2021:08:03 16:41:05
Exposure Time1/200 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating640
Lens Aperturef/2.8
Exposure Bias0.3 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length35.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlHigh Gain Up
ContrastSoft
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: _1052528.jpg (550 KB, 1067x1600)
550 KB
550 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePanasonic
Camera ModelDC-S1
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.3 (Windows)
PhotographerMARTIN BARON
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.2
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)35 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2021:08:03 16:41:12
Exposure Time1/200 sec
F-Numberf/1.2
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/1.2
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length35.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlLow Gain Up
ContrastSoft
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
Fantastic stuff, OP

These in particular
>>3924031
>>3923485
>>3923463

Post your IG if you have one
>>
>>3924032
good shit

File: vidgen tvs.jpg (60 KB, 971x1060)
60 KB
60 KB JPG
"Things are returning back to normal. For real this time" edition
All video related questions and discussion is intended for this thread. Here we discuss techniques, gear and anything else related to capturing video footage. Please don't pretend to be an expert if you don't know what you're talking about. Kindly leave your ego at the door.
Posting short films/scripts or other work you've done is encouraged.
We tend to use and recommend DSLRs/mirrorless cameras because they provide phenomenal picture quality for their price, have large sensors (ie the same size used in high-end cinema cameras and higher) and have interchangeable lenses.
In contrast, consumer camcorders normally have much smaller sensors and a fixed lens.

>STICKY - https://pastebin.com/35u6DcnF
>Helpful guide, additional books and more in-depth FAQs - https://web.archive.org/web/20200926115310/https://pastebin.com/kG0gRmTZ

>NO ONE CARES WHAT AN EXPERT YOU THINK YOU ARE. IF YOU’RE ASKING BASIC-AS-SHIT QUESTIONS, YOU CAN’T BE ALL THAT GREAT. SEE ABOVE

Previous thread >>3905152

Quick FAQS
>what’s the best camera available on a “budget”?

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
195 replies and 27 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3924347
that's what I was shooting for, thanks!
>>
I’m getting some vintage large format lenses in a lens board made in 1916 because they were made in my home town and they look cool. How could I adapt them to a mirrorless video camera. What look should I expect out of them? Could I use them as a taking lens in the way people use anamorphic projector lenses? What look should I except if I use them in a duel lens setup? If I can’t use them they look so cool as antiques but I was hoping to get a cool look out of them if I used them with a mirrorless video camera.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width640
Image Height571
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
File: 1971398_1_x.jpg (97 KB, 600x580)
97 KB
97 KB JPG
>>3924406
You'd have to figure out the back focal distance.
Machine a mount of the light length and fettle it down to fit.

Or make a bellows arrangement and duct tape your camera body to the back. and hope your sensor doesn't crop too badly
>>
>>3924448
I’m a red neck so I’ll probably use duck tape because if you can’t duck it fuck it,
>>
>>3924406
The labs and industrial workshops that were once used to make awesome lenses in the area I live in are now used to make meth. Kodak died in Rochester, but meth didn't die and the chemists that used to make high-quality kodak film now make high-quality meth.

File: P7144844low.jpg (1.24 MB, 2736x3648)
1.24 MB
1.24 MB JPG
I've been trying some abstract night photography. What do you think?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.
Camera ModelE-520
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 7.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.0
Color Filter Array Pattern744
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)188 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2021:07:15 11:11:20
Exposure Time6 sec
F-Numberf/16.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating400
Lens Aperturef/16.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Auto
Focal Length94.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlHigh Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationHigh
SharpnessHard
26 replies and 19 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3917153
>>3917152
>>3917150
These look like shit. Too sharp so it looks like baby's first time holding the camera.
>>
>>3921821
shut your FUCKING mouth no photo
>>
File: abstract.jpg (4.75 MB, 4634x3555)
4.75 MB
4.75 MB JPG
accident ngl

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeAgfa
Camera ModelOptima 6000 pocket
Camera Softwaredarktable 3.6.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2021:08:05 11:36:00
F-Numberf/2.7
Lens Aperturef/2.7
Focal Length27.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width4634
Image Height3555
>>
>>3917150
I took this last night, thinking about this thread.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
CommentScreenshot
Image Width1042
Image Height751

File: E0ltBhXXoAIRMqP__02.png (67 KB, 1396x920)
67 KB
67 KB PNG
Based Edition.

Post some hella pics my dudes.
34 replies and 10 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
anons... should i get cute pentax q?
>>
>>3924326

I sold mine pretty quickly. It was fun to shoot the telephoto zoom lens (eq. 85-250mm with constant 2.8 aperture).

But the image quality is pretty bad and the screen is hard to use in daylight.
>>
File: imgp8715_v2.jpg (208 KB, 638x950)
208 KB
208 KB JPG
Stopped down a bit to have some detail in the background. SMC F35-80

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePENTAX Corporation
Camera ModelPENTAX K10D
Camera SoftwareK10D Ver 1.31
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)52 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width638
Image Height950
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2021:08:04 20:09:52
Exposure Time1/400 sec
F-Numberf/8.0
Exposure ProgramNot Defined
ISO Speed Rating250
Exposure Bias0.7 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length35.00 mm
Image Width638
Image Height950
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationHigh
SharpnessHard
Subject Distance RangeClose View
>>
>>3924446

Nice photo
>>
File: imgp8717_v2.jpg (202 KB, 950x638)
202 KB
202 KB JPG
>>3924456
Thanks man, also snapped this one in landscape orientation and a bit zoomed in. Still unsure which one of them I should keep.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePENTAX Corporation
Camera ModelPENTAX K10D
Camera SoftwareK10D Ver 1.31
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)60 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width950
Image Height638
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2021:08:04 20:10:22
Exposure Time1/125 sec
F-Numberf/11.0
Exposure ProgramNot Defined
ISO Speed Rating250
Exposure Bias0.7 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length40.00 mm
Image Width950
Image Height638
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationHigh
SharpnessHard
Subject Distance RangeClose View

File: IMG_20210729_164533-01.jpg (3.51 MB, 3456x3456)
3.51 MB
3.51 MB JPG
"Tiny picture format" not a loud aka 35mm
Minimum format size here is 127 film.

I'm just chillin here on vacation in bulge area with my Pentacon, life could not get much better than this :)
20 replies and 6 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3921983
>>3921991
so much autism in this thread

show me some medium format photos of the op being bound and tortured because that would be so fucking kino
>>
>>3923655
Kinky
>>
File: 20210802_140142.jpg (4.95 MB, 4032x3024)
4.95 MB
4.95 MB JPG
i am heavy weapons guy
>>
I finished my roll, I'll get it developed next week.

Prepare for mediocre images depicting run down houses and soviet heaps.
>>
File: Kiev 60 (black) camera.jpg (243 KB, 1200x1200)
243 KB
243 KB JPG
Posting here cause I'm not sure if it's worth its own thread.

https://www.hartblei.com/category/kiev-60-456/
I ordered a Kiev 60 kit from Hartblei back in June and promptly received an order confirmation email, but nothing since. I've emailed them twice about a general order status update and to change my shipping address, and I've gotten no response. My card hasn't been charged, but is this a dead site/scam? I found a forum post from 2008 saying their business might be fucky, but I've also seen reddit threads from last year from people who just got them. What now bros?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 450D
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width1200
Image Height1186
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2017:05:18 15:44:29
Exposure Time1/50 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length46.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1200
Image Height1200
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard

File: 2021-08-04 23_48_59.png (1.57 MB, 1124x913)
1.57 MB
1.57 MB PNG
Where do you draw the line, /p/?
9 replies and 4 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3924348
>A (heavily) photoshopped image is a representation of the image of a thing that exists in your mind, but not reality, i.e. what you believe that thing to be.
damn sounds a lot like painting LMAO
I hope you're judt baiting otherwise what a sour human being you must be
>>
>>3924186
I don't really care about it, as long as it looks good. Over editing images usually doesn't look good tho
>>
cleaning up dead pixels and smudges is fine
>>
File: maxresdefault.jpg (225 KB, 1280x720)
225 KB
225 KB JPG
>>3924186
who do boomer photographs love the fuzzy glow so much?

it looks so tacky and fake, like bad HDR. I'm surprised it hasn't fallen out of fad yet after the last 6-7 years
>>
>>3924186
opening the application Photoshop is cheating. use film like a real person

File: 202538.jpg (461 KB, 1920x1038)
461 KB
461 KB JPG
Recently I was thinking about how hard it is to "make it" as photographer these days. With everyone having a smartphone and instagram I feel like the value of photography dropped almost entirely. Doesn't matter how good your pictures are. There's way too much noise to stand out and algorithms won't help you either.
All that made me procrastinate and binge watching movies over past couple weeks which sort of gave me some new ideas. If photography is dead why not just switch to videos? It's pretty much same but
>Youtube is still a good platform for creators where your work can actually get discovered and get some traction
>Prosumer cameras are getting very close to high end "pro" equipment allowing you to shoot LF on a budget
>Editing hardware/software is very affordable too
>Producing videos takes way more hustle than stills so the value still there
>Normies with their phones can't even into horizontal shooting
>More career options and ways to make money off it
Is there any reasons not to? I don't think so. We just entered golden age of cinematography and it's about the time to jump on that train before it's too late like it is with photography.
98 replies and 16 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
Also wanna get into videography. Nothing serious though, just for fun. i just enjoy watching movies, music videos, cms, shorts.
So much work is put into good cinematography though, whole crew and team.

https://youtu.be/9-emsPppGIs
>>
>>3923774
If you pay attention to lighting and shoot at the right time of day you can get decent looking results as a one-man-band.
>>
>>3923705
>>3923706
samefag dubfuck. hitchcock comment is aimed at quote
>>
>>3923887
That makes it even stupider. Ozu is one of the all-time masters.
>>
File: literally.me.webm (1.88 MB, 1000x540)
1.88 MB
1.88 MB WEBM
do you appreciate the work of thai cinematographer Sayombhu Mukdeeprom?

File: vintage-lens-cover.jpg (117 KB, 1000x667)
117 KB
117 KB JPG
Torn between the Sony α7 and Nikon Z6.
Both cameras are super but my goal is to shoot with vintage lenses, as they're cheaper to find and also bring something new to the table.

Feel that the Sony system is more robust on this aspect, finding plenty of adapters for all kinds of lenses. Nikon however doesn't seem to accommodate much else, though you'd find adapters for the Z mount, etc.

What do anons?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2019 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width1000
Image Height667
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2019:06:06 14:39:42
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1000
Image Height667
61 replies and 8 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3924408
thanks for adding to the actual conversation, please excuse the troglodytes vehemently defending their bullshit gear
>>
>>3924413
>How can 2000 X 1500 pixels make a difference?

That's some hard cope

>Dxo don't say what figures they use

You're welcome to buy the dxo analyzer suite, which consistently gives results between users of less than 0.2%, whilst imatests
margin for error is about 10% on a good day and is completely useless for measuring sharpness.

>>3924414
I already have a photo thread up ta.
>>
>>3924421
Lol, you really drink that cool aid! You cannot get better results for testing sharpness that iamtest, without ditching test charts. Unless you are afford very expensive machinery like lensrentals, iamtest is best what you have.

Also, having paywalled, closed source software is exactly opposite to open, you absolute retard.
>>
>>3924423
>You can't get better without getting better measurement hardware

Ah, you mean like what dxo uses? Lmfao, you really should have read those pages by now.

>But dxo isn't open source

I never claimed it was, and why would you think people not even good enough to earn money on their pet project would do better than the literal rocket scientists at the French space agency?
>>
File: o-SMUG-MAN-SUIT-facebook.jpg (543 KB, 1536x1902)
543 KB
543 KB JPG
>>3924424
>Ah, you mean like what dxo uses? Lmfao, you really should have read those pages by now.
physics dont real. Dxo just get better optics update on their reality, than ours. All those published papers about optica, that everyone can access are just outdated because of dxo.

Imagine fucking believing this

>but muh french NASA
Anon, DxO merely saya their "perceptual megapixel" scale is "based on the findings" of the CNES.

There is no astronauts flying on baguette for dxomark.

File: 1427394300960.jpg (635 KB, 1693x2950)
635 KB
635 KB JPG
How the fuck do you guys not have a boner when you shoot sexy models?
I was assisting some local photographer and this sexy ass latina was walking around in her thongs doing slutty poses and they noticed my bulge poking. She noticed and started laughing and I was super embarrassed. She then started shaking her ass in a doggy position making fun of me, asking if this would make the bulge at least a bit bigger. I got an e-mail from the photographer the next day stating I'm gonna get my small cut but our collaboration ends here.

Fuck this shit. How do I business in photography if I'm just a normal dude.
112 replies and 17 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3911012

name ??
>>
>>3913579

Titty magic
>>
professionalism
>>
File: file.png (811 KB, 480x720)
811 KB
811 KB PNG
>>3910974
>>3913593
>>
>>3924420
which on of them is you?

compact camera with nd filters and manual settings; is there such a thing?
15 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: 162806362089a5.jpg (44 KB, 464x329)
44 KB
44 KB JPG
>>3924107
Neither. Get LX100 instead. It's Leica D-LUX 7 in disguise.
>>
>>3924109
its too big. cant even fit in my pocker, its the only reason im going compact
>>
>>3924114
? It's the same size as the ones that you're quoting, and you still get a viewfinder.
>>
>>3924118
its a very big lens bump plus its not retractable so id need to keep the cap around as well
>>
File: IMG_2497.jpg (788 KB, 1280x853)
788 KB
788 KB JPG
>>3923651

Canon G9 X is quite compact

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 5D
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width2496
Image Height1664
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution180 dpi
Vertical Resolution180 dpi
Image Created2021:08:05 07:12:28
Exposure Time1/15 sec
F-Numberf/2.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating1600
Lens Aperturef/2.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1280
Image Height853
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard




Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.