>>3604792
Underexposed are good because you don't blow out details but if the scene is already dimly lit or dark generally like shooting dim interiors or shots at dawn/dusk then you should balance the exposure so it's not too dark in the shadowed areas.

>>3604792
I like this

>>3604675
I quite like this one. The noise works for it.

>>3604674
I like dark photos, so I usually disagree when people say something is underexposed, but the details of the goat get lost at that exposure due to his color.

>>3604673
I like the character here, but I don't really get what you were going for. I like the vibe in all these photos, but can tell you're a beginner. Nothing wrong with that experience won't fix.

You should not be on /p/ for legitimate advice, by the way. This place is only good for banter and gear talk. It's not even good for sharing art. For every anon who wants to assist you with constructive advice, there's 10 other anons who find more self-worth in autistic gatekeeping than actually taking interesting photos or helping others improve.

>>3604735
Kek

OP I like your dark photos. The first 3 I like more than the last one. I would brighten them up just a touch but not a lot. Just enough to bring the man's face in #1 into the midtones for example. I'd leave the blacks where they are.

>>3606235
They probably wouldn't live to post the shots

Pic of plane booking or stop LARPing.

>that watermark
reminds me of that sarheed and whatever his name was that was a meme a year or so ago.

>>3606352
How much have you spent so far? And you don’t even know what the exposure triangle is?

>>3606354
I know the general concepts, but I'm not gonna go out and do that shit by hand. I'm a programmer in my day job. We wrap everything in layers of abstraction so we don't have to think about it. That's what I'm doing to your "exposure triangle". It's unnecessary.

>>3606355
>I'm lazy and don't want to learn so I can get the best results and prefer slapdash mediocrity
Yup, you're a programmer.

>>3606355
>>3606352
You're either absolutely hopeless, or an 11/10 troll.

>>3606367
I'm gonna build a drone that will follow you and take pictures (for up to 30 minutes) (costs $5k)

File: P1250003.jpg (537 KB, 750x1000)

537 KB JPG

59 images.

Only 91 to go!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

File: P1240002.jpg (857 KB, 1000x750)

857 KB JPG

I like this one.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

>>3606057
It's out of focus and shaky on top of that. Take some fucking pride in your work man and put in some effort.

File: P1260011.jpg (633 KB, 750x1000)

633 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

File: P1260013.jpg (532 KB, 1000x750)

532 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

File: 1580044361402.jpg (780 KB, 1000x1000)

780 KB JPG

>>3606385
>I like to shoot on the go
They're generally tripod queens that demand slow, careful work. You're trading 12-24 exposures for fine grain and tonality. If you've ever thought "gee, I sure do wish everything was twice as expensive, twice the size and twice the work", go ahead. It's a special kind of fun, some would call it a form autism and they would be correct.

Like anon said, try it out. It's easy to get your money back.

>>3606394
>Shooting medium format due to the joy of using an MF SLR with WLF is reason enough to do it for some people.
Jeez sure does smell gassy in here!
OP doesn't have a reason to buy into MF besides the fact that they have gas, 35mm already suits there needs in every way.

>image quality
OP (and me) never mentioned this which implies that OP isn't concerned about it proving my point that it's just gas.

Also WLF's fucking suck. Horrible to compose on and they will give you spinal problem
>but muhhhhhh ground glass it's so life liek!!!

New gay shit you inbrebs
>>3606436
>>3606436
>>3606436
>>3606436
>>3606436

>>3606399
>queens that demand slow, careful work
Meanwhile I treat my RZ like an abusive husband treats his wife, just chuck it in my backpack, run after the train so it's jumping all around, wipe the lens with my tshirt, handhold 1/60 with the 110mm lens regularly, take like 3-4 exposures of the same subject from slightly different angles and exposure values, casually forget to screw in the release cable and end up shooting a blank, then screw the cable in, wind again in multiple exposure mode, forget to press the shutter on the body so I just keep pressing the cable and it's not doing anything, wind the film again in frustration, but this time forget to switch it to M mode so end up completely wasting 1/10th of a $12 roll. Some days I feel like I should throw all my gear in the river and start collecting stamps or something

>>3606434
I just really like the square aspect ratio, desu.

I'd probably get a Robot if they were affordable.

File: DSC00121.jpg (67 KB, 640x480)

67 KB JPG

>>3605864
>>3605865
>>3605867
>>3605870
These are nice, thanks for sharing.

File: DSC00119.jpg (69 KB, 640x480)

69 KB JPG

it's great to see so many new posters here. >>3604897
>>3605079
The fd200 also allows you to copy floppy disks to the memory stick. I think my usb floppy disk reader is dead so it's a nice little work around for now.

File: s750.jpg (1.5 MB, 1562x2383)

1.5 MB JPG

Got some samsung s750 p&s for free

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Samsung Techwin
Camera Model	<KENOX S730 / Samsung S730>
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	35 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2304
Image Height	3072
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	96 dpi
Vertical Resolution	96 dpi
Image Created	2020:01:26 23:40:50
Exposure Time	1/180 sec
F-Number	f/7.1
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	80
Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Auto, Red-Eye Reduce
Focal Length	5.80 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1562
Image Height	2383
Exposure Index	1
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Unknown
Sharpness	Normal

>>3605067
Good idea, problem is finding someone that's comfortable posting kids to 4chans.

File: haveaseat.png (132 KB, 427x640)

132 KB PNG

>>3605174
yeah maybe don't do that

>>3605067
How about teaching your dog to sit

Gonna post my contributions tomorrow!

>>3605518
I correct myself: tonight. That's when they'll come. Gonna head on over to my uni library.

>>3602462
>3602462
Sure why not.

Roll

>>3602462
roll

rolls of film.

Roll

Rolll

File: park pro 400h misters.jpg (1.94 MB, 1920x1280)

1.94 MB JPG

Another one that was inverted with the old NLP 1.0

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 7.0 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2019:01:23 20:25:31
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 20200126_154906.jpg (1.58 MB, 1500x1000)

1.58 MB JPG

Aand lastly, a spooky scary staircase. I think there might be a skeleton underneath there somewhere.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Unknown

>>3605913
This.

File: IMG_20200126_002224.jpg (792 KB, 1500x1123)

792 KB JPG

You just can't do decent night shots with it. Everything comes out as blown out as it tries to get as much light as possible and it just doesn't work.

Photo is an example.

File: IMG_20200126_002231.jpg (742 KB, 4016x3008)

742 KB JPG

You can edit it to look better but the grain remains.

File: IMG_20200126_002017.jpg (394 KB, 1896x2527)

394 KB JPG

So unless you can deal with massive digital grain you need to shoot in daylight.

>>3606123
>>3606125
These look ok

File: vladahcss12armani03.jpg (662 KB, 1600x2481)

662 KB JPG

/p/ has no taste for women.

>>3605114
who is that cutie?

>>3605143
Vlada Roslyakova, russian model from 2000s.

File: 2368713567_06c727de98_b.jpg (231 KB, 768x1024)

231 KB JPG

>>3605149
oh sweet thanx1

File: 980 Alina Kovalenko.jpg (101 KB, 600x741)

101 KB JPG

Alina Kovalenko

>I fell sorry for the m4/3 users who have a tiny sensor and even less bokeh.

I use both. Too poor to afford one? Also FF is tiny when you shoot 120 like me.

>>3597072
Tony Northrop please stop.

>>3596785
Wow, what camera did you use to take the picture? Never knew there were cameras that are wider than full frame.

>>3604933
>when you shoot 120
>pic not related

>>3606072
You have never heard of medium format cameras?

>>3606213
Taking a darkroom class and the professor is clueless and does still life photography that's kind of meh. Guess what our next assignment is?

You learn how to mix developer from base chemicals, but not how to properly sharpen digital images for print.

What do you want to do after you graduate?

>>3606259
"your wife"

>>3600508
Canon designs camera for obese people with big meaty hands. Sony designs cameras for actual humans.

>>3602814
I'm 5'10 and 147lb and find larger camera bodies much more comfortable and functional.

>>3602814
>>3602818
same, I have sad girl hands, but the ergonomics of the Sony's just don't work with me, bigger DSLRs just fit my hand better and are more comfortable to hold through a long work day.

File: Sony_2002.jpg (825 KB, 2000x1400)

825 KB JPG

Sony peaked in 2002.

Oh look, another thread of pathetic canikon fanboys rallying together to convince themselves that sony isn't about to run this entire industry in the next 5 years. If you need me i'll just be over a leddit!

>>3605899
There is one photographer in Norway, Morten Krogvold, who holds amazing workshops. People start crying and shit. He will push you and stay up with participants to 5 in the morning for them to finish.

>>3605920
Those are psychological tactics to build a cult of personality. Says nothing about the quality of instruction, just that he's slimy.

>>3605901
Based

>>3605873
NO. It's as if you guys learned nothing from the fedora clown.

>>3605873
Really aren't imo.
A big part of the value of a photography degree, is the formal qualification and the connections you get after completing it. And of course the time and effort you out into it for years that makes you improve.

A "workshop" has none of those. No qualification, no connections, and doubt you can learn much in a couple days (let alone a single day).