Do you ever think about your eyes as a camera? What kind of rendering do your eyes have? What does your eyes bokeh look like? What resolution and DR would you estimate your vision to have?I have pretty sharp center, but bokeh is kind of distracting. I get a lot of color fringing at the edge of bokeh balls, and lines often just multiply instead of smoothing out. I'm also stsrting to get some horizonthal astigmatism at infinity focus at older age.
>>3923646>>3923231That's simply false...
https://boards.4chan.org/h/thread/62216146308624
>>3922901god didn't intend for everyone to read
>>3921827People who think defective biological artifacts developed after millions of years of trial and lots of error are only possible by intelligent design really piss me the fuck off. They could see a near perfect circle in nature and then claim it can only be the work of a god just because humans know what a circle is.Good fucking god, I'm fuming at this retarded post.
>>3921827>>3921827Overdosing on DMT and LSD and shrooms are the only way that you can see this God that you speak of because psychedelics are the flesh of God and abusing psychedelics is a holy act.
I'm trying to get some feelings for photography what do yall think ?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera ModelIN2013Equipment MakeOnePlusFocal Length (35mm Equiv)0 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width4608Image Height3456Image Created2021:07:27 16:06:29Lens Aperturef/2.2Exposure Bias0 EVISO Speed Rating125White BalanceAutoShutter Speed1/1541 secFocal Length2.25 mmFlashNo FlashF-Numberf/2.2
>>3923199It is a rather photography photograph, I'd say.
>>3923198Good advice
>>3923188It's a phone and he can't choose the aperture?
>>3923225
>>3923195Based.>>3923225Well op isn't a good photographer at all
Mecha-birbs edition.You know the drillPrevious >>3920901[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareViewNX 2.8 WImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2021:08:03 14:42:35Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width4928Image Height2772
>>3924473[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1280Image Height853
>>3924475[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1280Image Height853
>>3924476[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1280Image Height853
>>3924479[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1280Image Height853
>>3924481[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1280Image Height853
Previous thread hit bump limit, read it thoroughly before posting >>3909562To get started, is IBIS similar to OIS in that I should turn it off when I don't need it? i.e. can it induce blur issues with faster shutter speeds?
>>3923934This.>>3923603Not this. Only do it if you're stupid.
>>6308624
There's a triathlon in my city soon, kinda wanna show up near the start line with my camera and tripod. Is this something that could get me harassed by security? I'd be on public land, less concerned with legality and more if someone will give a fuck about a non-accredited dude with a bigger camera. I know it can be an issue with events at venues like stadiums or race tracks, but this is just in the city. Alternatively I'll just set up along the route somewhere.
>>3924320If you're in America they can't do shit, you can take a picture of anything that's in public. Will you get harassed by cops? Maybe, but doing anything will get you harassed by cops.
Why are there never any tele lenses made specifically for APS-C sensors? I've seen some photography influencers mentioning how using a full frame lens on APS-C will lose a great amount of image quality, so why are there no APS-C wildlife/sports lenses and only wide/mid ones? Besides, they would be a lot cheaper, and I would bet plenty of wildlife photographers would use APS-C cameras for the reach.
Cleaning out my father's garage, I came across this old box of film canisters (not literally this image). Would it be worth it to have it developed or is it garbage from being out in the heat/cold? Also, who even develops film anymore, I went to Walgreens and Walmart and both wanted me to ship it off and I wouldn't get the negatives returned, turn around time was 4 weeks.
bump for mommie milky
>>3917446>>3920319kek... my champion, keep up the good work
Updates?
I want your mums tits, mate. Deliver.
Bump
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera ModelFC3411Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.3 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)22 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:08:03 16:40:59Exposure Time1/2 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/2.8Exposure Bias-0.3 EVMetering ModeAverageLight SourceDaylightFlashNo FlashFocal Length8.38 mmColor Space InformationsRGBExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePanasonicCamera ModelDC-S1Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.3 (Windows)PhotographerMARTIN BARONMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:08:03 16:41:39Exposure Time1/200 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating500Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastSoftSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePanasonicCamera ModelDC-S1Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.3 (Windows)PhotographerMARTIN BARONMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.2Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)35 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:08:03 16:41:05Exposure Time1/200 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating640Lens Aperturef/2.8Exposure Bias0.3 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length35.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastSoftSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePanasonicCamera ModelDC-S1Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.3 (Windows)PhotographerMARTIN BARONMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.2Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)35 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:08:03 16:41:12Exposure Time1/200 secF-Numberf/1.2Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/1.2Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length35.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastSoftSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
Fantastic stuff, OPThese in particular>>3924031>>3923485>>3923463Post your IG if you have one
>>3924032good shit
"Things are returning back to normal. For real this time" editionAll video related questions and discussion is intended for this thread. Here we discuss techniques, gear and anything else related to capturing video footage. Please don't pretend to be an expert if you don't know what you're talking about. Kindly leave your ego at the door.Posting short films/scripts or other work you've done is encouraged.We tend to use and recommend DSLRs/mirrorless cameras because they provide phenomenal picture quality for their price, have large sensors (ie the same size used in high-end cinema cameras and higher) and have interchangeable lenses.In contrast, consumer camcorders normally have much smaller sensors and a fixed lens.>STICKY - https://pastebin.com/35u6DcnF>Helpful guide, additional books and more in-depth FAQs - https://web.archive.org/web/20200926115310/https://pastebin.com/kG0gRmTZ>NO ONE CARES WHAT AN EXPERT YOU THINK YOU ARE. IF YOU’RE ASKING BASIC-AS-SHIT QUESTIONS, YOU CAN’T BE ALL THAT GREAT. SEE ABOVEPrevious thread >>3905152Quick FAQS>what’s the best camera available on a “budget”?Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>3924347that's what I was shooting for, thanks!
I’m getting some vintage large format lenses in a lens board made in 1916 because they were made in my home town and they look cool. How could I adapt them to a mirrorless video camera. What look should I expect out of them? Could I use them as a taking lens in the way people use anamorphic projector lenses? What look should I except if I use them in a duel lens setup? If I can’t use them they look so cool as antiques but I was hoping to get a cool look out of them if I used them with a mirrorless video camera.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width640Image Height571Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>3924406You'd have to figure out the back focal distance.Machine a mount of the light length and fettle it down to fit.Or make a bellows arrangement and duct tape your camera body to the back. and hope your sensor doesn't crop too badly
>>3924448I’m a red neck so I’ll probably use duck tape because if you can’t duck it fuck it,
>>3924406The labs and industrial workshops that were once used to make awesome lenses in the area I live in are now used to make meth. Kodak died in Rochester, but meth didn't die and the chemists that used to make high-quality kodak film now make high-quality meth.
I've been trying some abstract night photography. What do you think?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.Camera ModelE-520Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 7.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.0Color Filter Array Pattern744Focal Length (35mm Equiv)188 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2021:07:15 11:11:20Exposure Time6 secF-Numberf/16.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/16.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, AutoFocal Length94.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationHighSharpnessHard
>>3917153>>3917152>>3917150These look like shit. Too sharp so it looks like baby's first time holding the camera.
>>3921821shut your FUCKING mouth no photo
accident ngl[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeAgfaCamera ModelOptima 6000 pocketCamera Softwaredarktable 3.6.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2021:08:05 11:36:00F-Numberf/2.7Lens Aperturef/2.7Focal Length27.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4634Image Height3555
>>3917150I took this last night, thinking about this thread.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:CommentScreenshotImage Width1042Image Height751
>>3917150>>3917152>>3917153>>3917154>>3917272>>3917273>>3917274>>3917282>>3917287>>3920610>>3920611>>3920612>>3920613>>3920924>>3920957Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Based Edition.Post some hella pics my dudes.
anons... should i get cute pentax q?
>>3924326I sold mine pretty quickly. It was fun to shoot the telephoto zoom lens (eq. 85-250mm with constant 2.8 aperture).But the image quality is pretty bad and the screen is hard to use in daylight.
Stopped down a bit to have some detail in the background. SMC F35-80[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePENTAX CorporationCamera ModelPENTAX K10DCamera SoftwareK10D Ver 1.31Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)52 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width638Image Height950Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2021:08:04 20:09:52Exposure Time1/400 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramNot DefinedISO Speed Rating250Exposure Bias0.7 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo FlashFocal Length35.00 mmImage Width638Image Height950RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationHighSharpnessHardSubject Distance RangeClose View
>>3924446Nice photo
>>3924456Thanks man, also snapped this one in landscape orientation and a bit zoomed in. Still unsure which one of them I should keep.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePENTAX CorporationCamera ModelPENTAX K10DCamera SoftwareK10D Ver 1.31Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)60 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width950Image Height638Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2021:08:04 20:10:22Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/11.0Exposure ProgramNot DefinedISO Speed Rating250Exposure Bias0.7 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo FlashFocal Length40.00 mmImage Width950Image Height638RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationHighSharpnessHardSubject Distance RangeClose View
"Tiny picture format" not a loud aka 35mmMinimum format size here is 127 film.I'm just chillin here on vacation in bulge area with my Pentacon, life could not get much better than this :)
>>3921983>>3921991so much autism in this thread show me some medium format photos of the op being bound and tortured because that would be so fucking kino
>>3923655Kinky
i am heavy weapons guy
I finished my roll, I'll get it developed next week.Prepare for mediocre images depicting run down houses and soviet heaps.
Posting here cause I'm not sure if it's worth its own thread.https://www.hartblei.com/category/kiev-60-456/I ordered a Kiev 60 kit from Hartblei back in June and promptly received an order confirmation email, but nothing since. I've emailed them twice about a general order status update and to change my shipping address, and I've gotten no response. My card hasn't been charged, but is this a dead site/scam? I found a forum post from 2008 saying their business might be fucky, but I've also seen reddit threads from last year from people who just got them. What now bros?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 450DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.2Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1200Image Height1186Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Pixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2017:05:18 15:44:29Exposure Time1/50 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length46.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1200Image Height1200RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
Where do you draw the line, /p/?
>>3924348>A (heavily) photoshopped image is a representation of the image of a thing that exists in your mind, but not reality, i.e. what you believe that thing to be.damn sounds a lot like painting LMAO I hope you're judt baiting otherwise what a sour human being you must be
>>3924186I don't really care about it, as long as it looks good. Over editing images usually doesn't look good tho
cleaning up dead pixels and smudges is fine
>>3924186who do boomer photographs love the fuzzy glow so much?it looks so tacky and fake, like bad HDR. I'm surprised it hasn't fallen out of fad yet after the last 6-7 years
>>3924186opening the application Photoshop is cheating. use film like a real person
Recently I was thinking about how hard it is to "make it" as photographer these days. With everyone having a smartphone and instagram I feel like the value of photography dropped almost entirely. Doesn't matter how good your pictures are. There's way too much noise to stand out and algorithms won't help you either. All that made me procrastinate and binge watching movies over past couple weeks which sort of gave me some new ideas. If photography is dead why not just switch to videos? It's pretty much same but >Youtube is still a good platform for creators where your work can actually get discovered and get some traction>Prosumer cameras are getting very close to high end "pro" equipment allowing you to shoot LF on a budget >Editing hardware/software is very affordable too>Producing videos takes way more hustle than stills so the value still there >Normies with their phones can't even into horizontal shooting >More career options and ways to make money off it Is there any reasons not to? I don't think so. We just entered golden age of cinematography and it's about the time to jump on that train before it's too late like it is with photography.
Also wanna get into videography. Nothing serious though, just for fun. i just enjoy watching movies, music videos, cms, shorts.So much work is put into good cinematography though, whole crew and team.https://youtu.be/9-emsPppGIs
>>3923774If you pay attention to lighting and shoot at the right time of day you can get decent looking results as a one-man-band.
>>3923705>>3923706samefag dubfuck. hitchcock comment is aimed at quote
>>3923887That makes it even stupider. Ozu is one of the all-time masters.
do you appreciate the work of thai cinematographer Sayombhu Mukdeeprom?
Torn between the Sony α7 and Nikon Z6.Both cameras are super but my goal is to shoot with vintage lenses, as they're cheaper to find and also bring something new to the table.Feel that the Sony system is more robust on this aspect, finding plenty of adapters for all kinds of lenses. Nikon however doesn't seem to accommodate much else, though you'd find adapters for the Z mount, etc.What do anons?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2019 (Macintosh)Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1000Image Height667Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Pixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2019:06:06 14:39:42Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1000Image Height667
>>3924408thanks for adding to the actual conversation, please excuse the troglodytes vehemently defending their bullshit gear
>>3924413>How can 2000 X 1500 pixels make a difference?That's some hard cope>Dxo don't say what figures they useYou're welcome to buy the dxo analyzer suite, which consistently gives results between users of less than 0.2%, whilst imatests margin for error is about 10% on a good day and is completely useless for measuring sharpness.>>3924414I already have a photo thread up ta.
>>3924421Lol, you really drink that cool aid! You cannot get better results for testing sharpness that iamtest, without ditching test charts. Unless you are afford very expensive machinery like lensrentals, iamtest is best what you have.Also, having paywalled, closed source software is exactly opposite to open, you absolute retard.
>>3924423>You can't get better without getting better measurement hardwareAh, you mean like what dxo uses? Lmfao, you really should have read those pages by now.>But dxo isn't open sourceI never claimed it was, and why would you think people not even good enough to earn money on their pet project would do better than the literal rocket scientists at the French space agency?
>>3924424>Ah, you mean like what dxo uses? Lmfao, you really should have read those pages by now.physics dont real. Dxo just get better optics update on their reality, than ours. All those published papers about optica, that everyone can access are just outdated because of dxo.Imagine fucking believing this>but muh french NASAAnon, DxO merely saya their "perceptual megapixel" scale is "based on the findings" of the CNES.There is no astronauts flying on baguette for dxomark.
How the fuck do you guys not have a boner when you shoot sexy models?I was assisting some local photographer and this sexy ass latina was walking around in her thongs doing slutty poses and they noticed my bulge poking. She noticed and started laughing and I was super embarrassed. She then started shaking her ass in a doggy position making fun of me, asking if this would make the bulge at least a bit bigger. I got an e-mail from the photographer the next day stating I'm gonna get my small cut but our collaboration ends here.Fuck this shit. How do I business in photography if I'm just a normal dude.
>>3911012name ??
>>3913579Titty magic
professionalism
>>3910974>>3913593
>>3924420which on of them is you?
compact camera with nd filters and manual settings; is there such a thing?
>>3924107Neither. Get LX100 instead. It's Leica D-LUX 7 in disguise.
>>3924109its too big. cant even fit in my pocker, its the only reason im going compact
>>3924114? It's the same size as the ones that you're quoting, and you still get a viewfinder.
>>3924118its a very big lens bump plus its not retractable so id need to keep the cap around as well
>>3923651Canon G9 X is quite compact[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 5DImage-Specific Properties:Image Width2496Image Height1664Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution180 dpiVertical Resolution180 dpiImage Created2021:08:05 07:12:28Exposure Time1/15 secF-Numberf/2.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/2.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1280Image Height853RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
