OP can't shoot edition™Post your street work, critic, discuss techniques...Previous Thread: >>3734700[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX100FCamera SoftwareRawTherapee 5.8PhotographerYves LongpresMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image Width2100Image Height1400Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2020:11:20 22:05:19Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating12800Lens Aperturef/4.0Brightness-2.7 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeAverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length23.00 mmRenderingCustomExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownSharpnessNormalWhite BalanceAutoChroma SaturationUnknownFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeManualSlow Synchro ModeOffPicture ModeManual ExposureContinuous/Bracketing ModeOnBlur StatusOKFocus StatusOKAuto Exposure StatusOK
>>3768547same. I think these might have worked better at night and in B&W. otherwise during the day everything just ends up looking like a blur. where if it was at night, you'd have more negative space from areas that aren't like at all.
>>3768550>At nightThere's a 22.00 curfew here
>>3768553it gets dark at like 1630 anywhere north of the tropics rn
>>3768553what was the iso on those shots? i think you could've pushed it down a bit, and b&w might've worked better like other anon saidbut it's always good to experiment! keep it up :D
>>3768550>>3768572It's funny you say "during the day" and I went back and look at them again with this in mind and yeah they could actually pass for daylight shots but the truth is this was after sunset and these people were lit by shop windows and streetlights, plus I dialed in +1 exposure
How did he do it? All his new work look like a regular photography. His old ones, though, look like paintings.
>>3767827Are you implying that photographic talent is something that gets baked into you?
>>3768476I think he's implying that photography talent is hyped and attributed to you by the photography critics if you are jewish regardless if you are good or not.
>>3767425Wait what the fuck this is a photograph?
>>3768484Why wouldn't it be?
>>3768484Did you think it was a painting or something?
How do you call placing drawn characters on photos?
Not this one.
i like to think the animu women irl are like doom sprites and they only have 8 rotational sides to them
Superimposing. Thats the term youre looking for.
>>3766582>>3766631the "2D drawing shopped in an irl photo" thing originated from mid 2000s's 2ch/japanese otakus and got exported to 4chan with the waifu stuffi myself made a bunch of them with other anons when i stil hung out in the anime boards in 2009, we were inspired by the japs' works we saw on danbooru/pixiv, the shops were crude though and i used a super shitty tourist canon point and shootso i was pleasantly surprised when i learnt tumblr/ruskies took the shop to a more elaborate levelalso, this gimmick is what originally got me into photoshop/photography
>>3766639lets all love lain
Not just this year. Dead for ever.
>>3768301>. Billions of people who would have normally bought a camera no longer need it.That's because phone cameras have tons of filters and consoomers care more about filters than quality
>>3768309>met zack arias And that statement is related to this being a good event lol
>>3768313Hey, it really was a good event then.
>>3768301It's not dead from the coof, it's dead from the smartphoon. Get with the times boomer. Dead from smartphone counts for dead from cof in 2020.
>>3768152Good. I want the band wagon fags who spam the internet with filter presets to sell all their shit to jump on the next big thing and leave the craft for good.
SuperCCD edition. Discuss your CCD based cameras and share those wonderful colours.I personally am moving away from shooting 35mm colour negative to using an S5 Pro, and 120 format cameras for my monochrome work.
>>3768406>tfw no fool frame foveon[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width320Image Height281
Like this?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSAMSUNGCamera ModelDV300 / DV300F / DV305FCamera Software1203294Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.6Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)54 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution96 dpiVertical Resolution96 dpiImage Created2020:11:25 15:22:27Exposure Time1/350 secF-Numberf/3.6Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating80Lens Aperturef/3.6Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length9.70 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1500Image Height1125Exposure Index1Exposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastHardSaturationLowSharpnessNormal
>>3768406Nonsense, S5 colour and highlight latitude demolishes the 5D classic and any of its successors.
>>3768435the color accuracy gets really nasty when you push it's limits, and why wouldn't you just expose right? Just shoot on Av or Tv if you can't handle M.
On most digital cameras you are expected to expose for highlights to ensure the sensor is not clipped as those details will be unrecoverable. This means that the darker areas of the scene must be pushed in post to ensure a balanced image. This is the opposite of a colour negative film where the shadows should be exposed for as highlights are not blown on colour negative.The Fujifilm SuperCCD handles far more like a colour negative than any other sensor. This was why it was so popular in wedding photography to avoid blowing out the bride's dress in bright sunlight. It can also be used to effectively shoot into sunlight or strong artificial light without clipping. https://youtu.be/kCnRPLEgUfc
How do people get such clean frozen shots at night? Is ISO a joke to them? They dont look like wide open shots either[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Color Space InformationsRGBWhite BalanceAuto
>>3765969>>3765981This. Also short focal lengths help.>>3766000It already happened. Also nice trips.It already
>>3764030Exposure triangle:>shutterspeed>aperture>sensitivity With a slow shutterspeed of 1/10 and an aperture of f/2 at ISO 1600, your exposure is the same as f/5.6 and 1/40 at ISO 25600.2 stops slower lens + 2 stops faster shutterspeed = 4 stops higher ISO = 4 stops more noise.Keep in mind none of that is requiring any ultra fancy gear, pretty much all somewhat recent cameras can do ISO 1600 and 1/10 second shutterspeed and f/2 primes aren't exactly expensive lenses either.More modern or higher end cameras produce some pretty clean images at ISO 1600 (in that example) to begin with.You can still run a noise reduction algorythm over it to reduce noise at the cost of some sharpness.>>3766000Depends on the lens and setting.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>caring about ISO noise when this exists
>>3766686I'm absolutely sure even that software can't salvage the ISO 12800 pushed 3 stops from my EOS 2000D.
>>3766686You should check the tools/plugins from DxO Lab (Nik Collection), some work better than Topaz.For example i recall the Sharpening tool being much better with Nik it's not even funny, Denoise i think Topaz was better but they had different methods, Nik had specified a couple of ways of doing it which worked better in some situations. Also fuck Topaz for pushing auto AI shit, they reformatted and made some of their tools worse in recent iterations, tried and tested, for example DeNoise 1.3.2 is superior to DeNoise AI 2.0.0.
Used my phone for this picture. Is the color of the water kind of weird? I was at the beach, I live on a tropical island with clear blue water
>>3767185the water looks totally fine but the clouds are fucked. it looks like you did a lot of work in them though so overall, good job! i think the composition is great. saved.on second viewing the clouds are actually what draw my eye. technically they're overblown but out brings a different kind of story to the image, that it was "salvaged"
take a picture of something else
no subject. what made you decide to overexpose so badly? missed focus and the colors are off. noisy, nauseating, distracting bokeh gotten by opting for a bargain-bin lens. amateurish
>>3767185Idk. I'm wearing my blue light blocking glasses right now. Can't help you for shit.
>>3767999This. And lose the blown it clouds. It's an intriguing perspective.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareGoogleImage-Specific Properties:Image Width1668Image Height1112Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2020:11:29 13:49:06
Looking into Bill Hensons work and wondering what kind of lenses he uses.I know he prefers telephoto but would be cool to know the models.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 21.2 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution96 dpiVertical Resolution96 dpiImage Created2020:11:29 13:36:16Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1251Image Height1362
>>3768425What year is this from?
>>3768425- Canon EF 200mm f/1.8L- Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS Mark I
>>3768436Brilliant, thanks!>>37684292002 it seems:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCCo6BJe4eY&t
>In Waffenruhe, Schmidt shows West Berlin shortly before the fall of the wall by combining portraits of youths with images of non-specific sites bordering the wall and the wall itself. As is characteristic of his work, it is the arrangement of the individual photographs and the use of high contrasts — the interplay and dialogue between the multi-layered images — that gives the images their distinct meaning, revealing the correlation between historical events and individual biographies.>Schmidt evokes a world of ruptures and absences that eschews a confident, comprehensive point of view. The images work with Schleef's text to create a brusque, entirely individual perspective on the fragility of human existence.Photobook Flip Through:>https://youtu.be/Rt9zaSIzbFQ
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC (Macintosh)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2019:05:22 11:54:29Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1499Image Height931
>>3768353>the arrangement of the individual photographs and the use of high contrasts — the interplay and dialogue between the multi-layered imagesBlah.>their distinct meaningNo meaning thus far.
>>3768376how much time you have spend with the book?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC (Macintosh)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2019:05:22 11:54:04Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1499Image Height930
Oh look, another photographic project about weaklings and degenerates Go to church and find God, bye
>>3768394>Go to church and find GodSo to where there's even more weaklings and degenerates? Why?
Hi[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution144 dpiVertical Resolution144 dpiImage Width750Image Height921
Is this a good price or will they be going for this price regularly after Dec 31?
wow, this board really slowed down
>>3767907Everyone is too busy snatching their canons at a reduced price to shitpost
>>3767634>f/4-7Amazing how full frame is becoming so cheap that having slow kit zooms like entry DSLRs used to have is becoming common and even accepted
>>3767929The body only option is $900. The version with the kit lens is $1000. Seems like a no-brainer for a first lens. When I get a better lens, I'll flip it on ebay for $100.
>>3767929Amazing that people had ever accepted something less than an already amateur-sized format in an interchangeable lens system.
Post finds here. Picked this guy up from a yardsale for $8. Why don't they make cameras like this anymore? Ergonomics are for pussies I want my cameras built like literal fucking bricks.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelSM-N976UCamera SoftwareN976USQS3CTI7Sensing MethodNot DefinedFocal Length (35mm Equiv)26 mmMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.5Image-Specific Properties:Image Width4032Image Height3024Image OrientationUnknownImage Created2020:11:28 01:19:23Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiISO Speed Rating400Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramF-Numberf/1.5Exposure Time1/40 secFocal Length4.30 mmFlashNo FlashMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardExposure Bias0 EVImage Height3024White BalanceAutoBrightness-0.4 EVImage Width4032Exposure ModeAutoLens Aperturef/1.5Color Space InformationsRGBAltitude0.00 mTime (UTC)00:00:00
12 bux for these. Im gonna re-sell them along with a bunch of other cams to get a Canon P
>>3767899The Argus C3 specifically? Relatively slow lenses, slow max shutter, not a great rangefinder mechanism (relatively short base distance), and also separate viewfinders for focusing and framing aren't as fast as combined. I don't think these are dealbreakers though and if you like using the camera, then by all means.
>Minolta 110 Zoom Date>MinoltA X-370>Canon 300DAll for under $50.Thrifting is the reason I am into photography at all. I'm practiccing with these while I save up for a more modern camera.
>>3768233you can make a decent sum if you restore and flip too. hipsters will pay out their flat booties for any shiny/smooth film camera
>be me>buy camera to fight mental health issues>don't want to spend more time in front of a computer (already a web dev for work)I know the whole "do what you want/enjoy" but how much am I missing out on by not doing raw+post? Is it 10% of the result? Is it 80%?Am I doomed?D3400 with 18-55 AF-P kit
>>3766200Are you me in the future?Hello!
>>3766200>decide to try shooting in raw>13 gb of snapshits in one day>back to jpgY'all must be rich in hard drives
>>37669901 Tb hard drives are cheap as fuck.
>>3767006I use 1tb for half a year.
>>3766990>Buy $2000 camera>dont buy $60 1 tb external hdd
Come here to avoid the election shitposting edition All video related questions and discussion is intended for this thread. Here we discuss techniques, gear and anything else related to capturing video footage. Please don't pretend to be an expert if you don't know what you're talking about. Kindly leave your ego at the door. Posting short films/scripts or other work you've done is encouraged. We tend to use and recommend DSLRs/mirrorless cameras because they provide phenomenal picture quality for their price, have large sensors (ie the same size used in high-end cinema cameras and higher) and have interchangeable lenses. In contrast, consumer camcorders normally have much smaller sensors and a fixed lens. >STICKY - https://pastebin.com/Nu5a8Jjk >Helpful guide, additional books and more in-depth FAQs - https://pastebin.com/kG0gRmTZ >NO ONE CARES WHAT AN EXPERT YOU THINK YOU ARE. IF YOU’RE ASKING BASIC-AS-SHIT QUESTIONS, YOU CAN’T BE ALL THAT GREAT. SEE ABOVE Previous thread >>3743418 Quick FAQS >what’s the best camera available on a “budget”?Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>3768094No advantage from 32bit in regards of 24 bit but definition of your signal. You just get more clarity because your signal gets more details.My advice is stick to 24bit and invest in a better mic.
>>3768201I kind of suspected this and after a bit more looking, this is the conclusion I've come to. Thank you for the confirmation.
so I'm not really into the technical part of vids but I also love the shitty 2012 vibes my old camcorder has.how do I get friends to vlog/make content with?
Bump limit reached, new thread>>3768223>>3768223
>>3761568The real secret is to get in on the ground floor of an agency or studio as a staffed videographer/editor/whatever. I graduated with a film degree and got in at a marketing agency of 10ish people being 'the video guy' who does every aspect of video work for clients who need it, meaning I plan the shoot, write the script, shoot the pieces, record the audio, edit them, color them, everything. I think the industry is going to move towards this pipeline. My company was sourcing the video work to a freelancer, but the guy was incompetent (or competent) and ended up charging them out the ass for revisions, so they found it to be cheaper to hire someone inhouse. Same thing happens with game studios, production houses, even some film places. There will be bigger agencies where you will probably have specialization, where someone might be JUST a DP, or JUST an editor, or JUST a motion graphics artist, but the idea is the same. It's not until you probably hit LA or NYC where you can be hyperspecialized in your job market. For comparison, I work in VA, not in DC though. I feel like freelancing is only viable when you're in a huge metropolitan market where there's enough clients for smallish freelancers, places like NYC or LA or Miami or Austin or Atlanta. If you're not in those cities, try to get in with an agency or a studio or a post production house and work up.
Does anybody have experience with using mobile phone gimbals? I've been considering getting one but I'm not sure which.Pic related is the one I'm most likely to get right now (the DJI OM 4) but reviews said that the app you have to use with it downgrades your camera resolution which sucks
>>3766006any good third party camera app will "downgrade your resolution" as your phones stated resolution is achieved through AI interpolation
>>3766058>>3766006I don't have that one, but I can used mine with any camera app. The gimbal app just has some features like tracking objects and shit like that, but you can stabilize video recording with any camera app.
I use the OM3 quite often just using the stock iPhone camera app. Don't care for the tracking features. The stock app can do timelapses and hyperlapses and normal shooting and so on just fine.
I bought an OSMO yesterday on Black Friday, returned it today. Nice stabilisation, but the app killed it for me. iPhone app presumably fine based on youtube videos etc, but the Android version is gimped.- 30FPS locked frame rate (due to Google / Android not allowing third party apps anything other than 30FPS apparently), so if you want more than 30, you can't use the DJI app nor any remote features of it i.e. it's a stabiliser only. Also explains why Android version has no slo-mo, because 15FPS looks like shit.- For fuck only knows why reason, the DJI app can only save to native phone storage on Android, NOT SD Card. DJI forums show complaints about that going back over a year, and despite DJI responding by giving non working instructions to change storage for the app, and then eventually admitting phone storage only in those same threads, they still list it as being able to use SD Card on Android in their FAQs. That's been pointed out to them multiple times but they just don't give a fuck.Summary - If you're an iPhone user, it's good. If you're Android and you JUST want a stabiliser and nothing more and don't mind having to use your phone screen for everything (even the record button on the OSMO is tied to their app) then go for it. If you're Android and want the OSMO physical controls to work (record, zoom) and / or any of eth trick software features like tracking, lapse etc, then you better like 30FPS and have plenty of room on your phone storage.
