Is Rhein II kino?
>>4127354I thought you had a beef with derivative stuff
>>4127354go back to /tv/ faggot
>>4128319 what's the issue? 2 deep 4 u?just fyi I haven't used 4chan/tv/ in years
>>4127354>rhein ii but it's a road and movesbravo nolan, brought tears to my eyes
>>4129456ouch
Post your tips, tricks and horror stories of focus pullingAlso wtf is with modern movies using AF?? i've watched 2 different movies (different years, genres, directors, etc.) in the last 2 days and there have been scenes where nothing changes but the AF hunts...like WTF? is the art of Focus Pulling gone?
>>4129435i gave up filmmaking due to the horror of focus pulling
>>4129435where's your trip?
>>4129435Once I pulled my focus so hard I couldn't walk for days after
For questions that's too stupid to have it's own thread. How do i shoot in indoor low light condition without using flash/external light help and get a pretty decent results?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D7100Camera SoftwareVer.1.04Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.3Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern664Focal Length (35mm Equiv)84 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiExposure Time1/40 secF-Numberf/5.3Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating1000Exposure Bias-2 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFocal Length56.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width6000Image Height4000RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4128911you could do this even with a kit zoom and macro rings.Keep in mind this was not filmed in one piece, there is a cut when it zooms in
>>4116018Needing some help with PPI and print stuff..So I have an image that I exported at full res (6000x4000pixels) but 240ppi and I've sold some prints (20x25cm) Will there be issues with the prints?
>>4129183I think that will be ok, I printed a 6000x4000 photo to 30cm X 20cm and it looks fine
Is it worth doing editing on the side through fiverr?
Shot with a 10 year old d7000. It's noisy because I exposed to the left (afraid of blown highlights) and I didn't know I should exposing to the right.This started as a practice to get familiar with photoshop's sky replacement.I then modified the curves, color balance, and added a pink fill in overlay mode at 10% opacity.Questions:How do I know when I've pushed something too far? When something is too fake/processed? Or is that all subjective?How do make images sharper out of the camera? This was probably shot at the widest aperture with my kit lens (but the low iso and high shutter speed made it dark/noisy). Is it as simple or shooting at tighter aperture?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 23.1 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2023:01:26 20:57:33Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width2325Image Height2000
I love taking pictures with my full frame mirrorless and then inserting my SD card into the computer to look at what Ive shot. I also enjoy editing the photos. All in all the process of creating photographs is a creative endevour that I really like partaking in.But lets be real, nobody (aside from perhaps a few other photographers) ever care about or like looking at your photographs. It doesnt matter whether you are a master photographer or not. I can take photos that feels like art to me. But when I look at other people's photographs, I couldn't care less. Sure I enjoy having a nice background on my PC, but in those cases its just about the subject in the photograph. I couldnt care less about who took the photograph.I don't know the name of a single photographer, except that Ansel guy (but only because I keep hearing that name being repeated here - Ive never actually looked at any of his pictures).Photography is a meme.Now video on the other hand, there may be some potential to create something that people actually want to look at. Maybe.
>>4127869thank uhere the unmirrored version[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS M50Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 5.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2022:07:22 04:01:59Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/11.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating320Lens Aperturef/11.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo FlashFocal Length40.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4126625Sean . . . . this won't get you the homosexual lover you so ardently desire.
>>4126569Who are you taking photos for? That will give you your answer
>>4127756Even they will fade overtime
This thread is full of faggots. I fuckin go out and I take my camera, I take photos of a cool bird or the moutains, I edit them and just post them here or on fb. It's a fun, relaxing hobby. Getting a nice shot of a bird you haven't seen is a good feeling. Seeing nature and capturing it feels nice. Not everything has to have some deeper meaning. Just do what you enjoy doing instead of complaining about meaningless shit. Pray and spray or have 2kb on a SD who gives a shit. You sound like a little bitch complaining about shit. Go. Be someone's wife or something you faggots.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution1000 dpiVertical Resolution1000 dpiColor Space InformationsRGB
>sony canon and panasonic absolutely BTFOalso wtf it took 10 years since the first FF mirrorless camera for someone to make a real pancake lens? So the wider Z mount is not a meme?
>>4120320I just want them to make a ZF and a 40mm with an aperture ring
>>4129309A z mount film camera would be epic >evf for accurate exposure >mirrorless tier AF>unbeatable film results Epic
>>4129312pretty cool idea. However, mirrorless AF is on the sensor, how would that work with film?
>>4129321>She needs AFdumb snoytard
>>4129321>i can't take photos with my 50fps shutter, AI autofocus, 300mp sensor and 72 element 5-700mm lens
can somebody redpill me on the fx3? is this a strictly video device?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-1Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 22.3 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.0Focal Length (35mm Equiv)67 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width3840Image Height2560Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Pixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2021:04:14 12:45:47Exposure Time1/160 secF-Numberf/9.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/9.0Brightness6.9 EVExposure Bias-0.7 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length67.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3840Image Height2560RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
No. Yes.
no internal ND = sony failure tbqhwyf
>So this is the power of a Nikon D850, $4,500 body only camera, 45MP, all the specs and smarts you could imagineDo you think camera companies will ever reach the level of supercar companies where they can pick and choose and ultimately maintain ownership of their top-tier products?
>>4123789its 45mp the. the higher the mp the higher the shutter speed needs to be
>>4126386>what is leicainvite only purchases are coming, screencap this
In order of importance:PhotographerLightingLensBody>>4123708Yeah it does. If you want consistently good lenses there’s always sony. >>4123709Using retard mode is indeed user error. Program shift/hyper program is the professional mode, and they do pay attention to what the camera is choosing…
>>4123776Because the incompetent zach tier photographer set it up that way
>>4129045Obsessed.
Let me guess…you need more?Henri Cartier-Bresson: *sips tea*Well /p/?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width959Image Height1200Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>412234950mm is too zoomed in even on full frame>inb4 full frame is crop, 6x7 is the real full frame, 50mm is an UWA
>>412734740 really is such a great focal length, ga645i greatest camera ever suck my testies.
>>4127402get the gw690 like a real man>>412734740mm is the best focal length ever. so fucking comfy
>>4127402ga645 goated[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS5 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Focal Length (35mm Equiv)0 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width4000Image Height6000Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Pixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2017:04:18 22:56:26Exposure Time4 secF-Numberf/0.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Brightness-8.1 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceCool White FluorescentFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length0.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1000Image Height750RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>412233540mm for places and things
How do you personally take pics of people in public?>Just straight up, unapologetically>Hold at waist with articulated screen out>Zoom Lens>etc.
>>4124687>>Just straight up, unapologetically>>Hold at waist with articulated screen out>>Zoom Lensi've been trying all of these, plus asking them. it's takn me a long time to work up the nerve to ask people but it's still less stressful than just walking right up to people and blasting, or trying to sneak subtle shots>>4126566>>4125781interesting- i never thought about avoiding eye contact. does that work in spaces where the subject and myself are the only people? i imagine it works fine in a crowd or busy area but if there is no one else around, it seems awkward not to acknowledge the personi try to do the fishing method but most of the time, people walking into the frame notice me lining up a shot and either go around or rush through and it doesn't work>>4124966agree with anon that this probably would have been better if you were closer[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-E4Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.8Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)135 mmMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2023:01:17 20:52:40Exposure Time1/500 secF-Numberf/2.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/2.0Brightness2.3 EVExposure Bias0.3 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length90.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4416Image Height2944RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownBlur StatusOKChroma SaturationNormalContinuous/Bracketing ModeOnAuto Exposure StatusOKFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeAutoFocus StatusOKPicture ModeManual ExposureSharpnessNormalSlow Synchro ModeOffWhite BalanceAuto
>>4126640>does that work in spaces where the subject and myself are the only people?if you're trying to project that you're not specifically taking photos of that person, then it can work. like if you're making it look like you're pointing your camera at something else, taking video, etc.it also obviously depends on the sensitivity of the person. like if you're in a small room with only one other person that's not gonna work, but if you're walking down the street and somebody is walking towards you, it's totally doable.no eye contact isn't for everyone, but I prefer it. there are plenty of street photographers who like to make deliberate eye contact when a person notices them and then smile, or even smile and say thank you. I prefer to avoid eye contact. I feel like it just lets me fluidly move in and out of the situation.
>>4126644interesting. i'll think about trying this out next time i'm shooting. btw nice double dubs[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-E4Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.8Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)135 mmMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2023:01:17 21:13:46Exposure Time1/800 secF-Numberf/2.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating320Lens Aperturef/2.0Brightness5.5 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length90.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4416Image Height2944RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownBlur StatusOKChroma SaturationNormalContinuous/Bracketing ModeOnAuto Exposure StatusOKFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeAutoFocus StatusOKPicture ModeAperture Prior AESharpnessNormalSlow Synchro ModeOffWhite BalanceAuto
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzAVvFmP2loi found this helpful
it is important to remember that 4chan is a controversial website and should be approached with caution
https://www.chronophoto.app/
>>4129166first game 3k got thrown off by a mariachi band, suddenly realized those bastards have been dressing the same way for 100 years
What do I win?
Decided to play again to see if it was a fluke but no
lole git gud
>>4129259shiddddddddd :DDDDDDDDDDD
What kind of composition requires corner to corner sharpness with a large wide open aperture (1.4 etc)? I'm genuinely curious.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width828Image Height356
>>4126834>Astro starfieldsbest actual answeralso >>4125056also when you happen to want to focus on something near the edge of the frame, though that's not strictly corner to corner
>>4126759There's plenty of crop and cine lenses with superb corner performance wide open. High end olympuses and leicas...
>>4125032corner to corner sharpness wide open isn't really a thing outside of something that youtubers who make money talking about lenses say. it's stupid.
>>4126759Have you ever seen a DOF scale in your life? Especially on a wide angle lens?
>>4125032[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 5DImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution200 dpiVertical Resolution200 dpiImage Created2013:08:13 14:40:56Exposure Time30 secExposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating1600Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
What did we think?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJdWAXh2uG0
>>4121041i agree, i use it as an excuse to consume gear
What other boards do /p/ must adhere to like all good flag waving 4chantards. I wonder if there is a 4chan uniform or a special handshake so that they can recognize each other. Anyone who doesn’t know the handshake or is disdainful of the uniform is automatically labelled a redditor because if you are not a 4chantard you MUST be a phlebbitor. Right?It would be nice to find a space where grownups can have intelligent conversations about photography and the issues surrounding it. That doesn’t happen here or on Reddit. The only difference between the two is that on the latter belligerence and asinine comments get removed, it doesn’t improve the rest of it much though.
Pretty based
this arrogant retard thinks everything pertaining to photography as an art or an activity on youtube is pretentious
>>4121421>>4121436what a strange person
to be alive and active photographer when companies actually respected their customers and actually made innovations in photography instead of just muh megapickle wars
>>4125683It'll be manual focus on dslr and mirrorless, but it will work just fine on every body that can handle EF mount, and that's pretty much every mirrorless and cinema camera in existence.
>>4127335wait can I put that on a film EOS?
>>4125327It's for super 35 sensors>>4125332Canon's lens is actually 1000mm, not 1000mm equivalent. >>4125617Servo zoom, mostly for broadcasting. Available in EF and PL mounts. Would work great with a BMCC6K.
>>4129208>$0.50 have been deposited in your canon shilling account
>>4129213>objective data is shilling noweatabagofdix.jpg
Maybe you remember my previous thread on the Zfc, somehow I convinced myself to buy one and it arrived today and fuck me I am so dissapointed :(>be me>life long Nikon user>psyche myself up for retro digital camera>play with my dads old FE for inspiration>Nikon ergos and quality is always on point>fuckitfeelsgoodman.jpg>mailman arrives>box feels empty>heart sinks at being ripped off from eBay seller>open box anyway>cameras there, is perfect, no issues>pick up camera>feels like holding a holga toy cameraWhat did NIkon mean by this? this is the flimsiest piece of shit I've ever handled, I can't believe all physical stores were out of stock of this piece of shit, if I were able to handle it in store I never would have bought it.
>>4129105it's a picture of the top plate gap on the X-Pro 3 taken from a fuji site
>>4129112oh lol... i thought it was a sample pic from a FUJI>nailed picking the source image though
>be OP>be American>don't understand what grams are unless talking about grams of sugar in a big gulp>buy new toy>meant to buy Big Mac>get angry>lie about it on /p/ to advertise for snoy
>>4129198>Shitty hipster camera is plastic toy>this is sony advertisingHipsters are the real sony advertisersAny time a flaw is pointed out in anything else they cry "SNOY!" as if to say sony lacks that flaw
>>4129198OP is clearly a Pajeet troll
So my mediocre ass is moving from x series to either leica m11 or gfx 100s or nikon z9, my shoulder hurts from carrying the x-t4, which should i choose?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-T4Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 6.1 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)83 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2023:01:22 16:52:34Exposure Time1/750 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating320Lens Aperturef/8.0Brightness9.1 EVExposure Bias-0.7 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceDaylightFlashNo FlashFocal Length55.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessHardSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4128129great great photo anon
>>4128128Idk. If you want a new camera, get it. Why not a Hasselblad?
>>4128128>Wanting a bigger sensor>A XT-4 is too heavyYou are in a pickle my friend, good lenses on full frame may strain you good.
>>4128128>Leica M11https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lS1KKs1VpsY
>>4128129but there aren't many big asses to detect there with a big ass sensor.