>>4179172
sony vastly improved minolta and cameras in general

minolta before they bought them was a failing company that wasn't even third best. now we have the A7 series, the best cameras on earth, and some of the best lenses period.

>>4179172
>what else have they ruined?
(you)

ive got a cybershot 5.1 its pretty nice in black and white imo

File: a_DSC01283.jpg (956 KB, 2535x1267)

956 KB JPG

>>4178383
muh dsc w50

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	DSC-W50
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2006:03:04 23:37:42
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	80
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	6.30 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2535
Image Height	1267
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: 1676781398532790.jpg (128 KB, 1280x960)

128 KB JPG

>>4178383
I own pic related. It's pretty good and feels comfy. Could be a great camera to shoot random stuff in street like daido moriyama.

>>4182661
I've updated my X-E4 to v2.0. Should I be concerned?

>>4182654
Is Hello Kitty's female-gendered or female-sexed?
What are the implications of shoving a pack of instant film into her from behind?

>>4182783
It's known she can only take Instax Mini, so you tell me what that means. If it fits it's mini.

>>4182664
Fuji = trannies

>>4182661
Most normie photographers are absolute gearwhores who are only concerned with upcoming camera models and can't wait 1 second before installing the latest firmware/preordering the newest lenses.
I was once downvoted into oblivion for telling people to not install the latest firmware on release date because effectively you're beta testing but "it's been tested already by Fuji lol" so of course every possible situation + combination of lens and camera must've been tested before release.

>>4182878
>obsessed

Moop, is that you? No it can't be, moop actually takes photos.

>>4182919
What do you call trying to find every picture I posted (and missing most) to make a collage?

>>4182920

Lmao. The secret photos routine? Try making a collage of moop's photos, you'll be busy for days.

>>4182921
How would I find them, Moop? I wanted to find the one with the dusty A7 to laugh at it and couldn't even find that one. Help me out bud.

Are there better examples of aliasing than moire? It technically must be there without the filter.

>>4182908
I'm not inspired by this, sweaty.

File: PICT0098.jpg (1.75 MB, 3389x2256)

1.75 MB JPG

>>4181082
makes sense

apparently fog can be removed with benzotriazole so I'll try that:
https://www.diyphotography.net/how-i-removed-base-fog-from-old-film-stocks/

wish I knew how to fix the recipe so it wouldn't do this though

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	M126
Camera Model	M126
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.18
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2023:02:28 18:27:00
Exposure Time	1/30 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	3200
Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Brightness	1 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	2.90 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5648
Image Height	3760
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Digital Zoom Ratio	1.0
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal

>>4181075
At what temperature are you developing? Are you matching the room temp water (68F) like you mentioned? You might need to heat it up more.

I had success with beerol, but I needed to heat that up to 90F

Two vids on the beer recipe:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gy_DLMpTrnA
https://youtu.be/UKBEpvh_ySM

>>4181117
I'll try it out, by 'success' you mean no fogging?

>>4181128
I mean my results certainly weren't as clean as a more traditional developer, but no fogging. My results were just pretty grainy.

>>4181075
Are you fixing it for long enough?

It's because you use your phone.

Now if you used Sony FF camera you'd see the color like it is supposed to be.

>>4179233
>>4179258
excellent contribution kys

>>4179230
holy cringe

>>4179235
Would it be possible to induce this by shining white led lights behind you onto the object you wanna capture?

>>4179230
Good light is how a good photograph comes to be.

File: 1661942633204.jpg (1.35 MB, 4272x2848)

1.35 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 1100D
Lens Size	18.00 - 55.00 mm
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.0.4
Lens Name	EF-S18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 III
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2023:05:25 23:47:04
Exposure Time	30 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	18.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4272
Image Height	2848
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Mode	Manual
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Center-Weighted
Sharpness	Unknown
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Large
Focus Mode	Manual
Drive Mode	Single
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Normal
Macro Mode	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	288
Color Matrix	129

File: 1684263759324.jpg (1.02 MB, 4272x2848)

1.02 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 1100D
Lens Size	75.00 - 300.00 mm
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.0.4
Lens Name	EF75-300mm f/4-5.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2023:05:25 23:05:52
Exposure Time	5 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	300.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4272
Image Height	2848
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Mode	Manual
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Center-Weighted
Sharpness	Unknown
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Large
Focus Mode	Manual
Drive Mode	Single
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Normal
Macro Mode	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	288
Color Matrix	129

File: 1680806580315.jpg (24 KB, 568x649)

24 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 1100D
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	568
Image Height	649
Image Created	2023:05:11 22:39:38
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Program	Manual
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
Focal Length	300.00 mm
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Metering Mode	Pattern
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Image Height	1504
White Balance	Auto
Image Width	2256
Exposure Mode	Manual
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal

>>4182728
I have nothing against that nice pic of the moon
But
>post your long exposure photos
>post a sub-second photo
N

File: 1676210135241.jpg (403 KB, 2256x1504)

403 KB JPG

>>4182730
Fair point. I just had a really nice pic of the moon I never get a chance to post.
>the astro thread
Yea, but since I wanted to make a thread anyway.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 1100D
Lens Size	18.00 - 55.00 mm
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.0.4
Lens Name	EF-S18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 III
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2023:04:17 22:36:23
Exposure Time	5 sec
F-Number	f/3.5
Exposure Program	Not Defined
Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	18.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2256
Image Height	1504
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Evaluative
ISO Speed Rating	Auto
Sharpness	Unknown
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Unknown
Image Size	Unknown
Focus Mode	Manual
Drive Mode	Single
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Normal
Macro Mode	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	320
Color Matrix	129

>>4179133
Never, the V is eternal.

>>4182625
This guy literally took a term coined by a pedophile mad scientist and ran with it all the way home and claims it’s a scientific social reality.

Fucking tripfags. You are all shit

>>4182883
>european
so the only ones that got it right

there is no word needed for “gender roles”. You have a man’s duties and a womans duties. It’s already covered.

How's Fuji's quality control these days? Is it good or has it declined?

>>4183438
declined a bit yes, worst thing is the x-pro 3, most common is x-t5 dials being loose. still rare though.

>>4182470
nigga what are you doing
I guess at least it's not koikatsu

>>4182430
Uh oh brand fanboy alert. They redesigned the bodies in 2019. Even the A7C and A7SIII received improved weather sealing. Sony cameras are now pentax tier.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/7SVFyl46uMg
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/0Vm0ClhpC_E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqk1K3CCl_4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaryZcOcnJ4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-VDIEpGZ1c
But with better lenses, better ergonomics, better lenses, and the superior viewfinder. Sony is an unscrupulous and immoral company so they didn't improve anything until they had competition. But at least they let you have third party lenses.

But ou're right about fuji. Fuji did the opposite. Their weather sealing has gotten progressively worse so there are visible gaps even in the $6000 GFX100s. Someone had one fail from condensation inside of a dive housing.

>>4182402
>T7 is garbage to be avoided at all costs.
A bit dramatic. You just get what you pay for. Every camera is good enough for a beginner

New edition >>4182713

>>4180439
Why? What valid points can you make?

>>4182428
I’m asian so it places me in the “full control of your culture, government, land, and economy” class actually.

>>4182450
You said cracker so you must be the cracked, sorry Chang.

>>4182450
>doesn't know
Kek

>>4182450
You people just do the bidding of chaim

>>4182450
>i'm part of the banker elite
doubt.jpg

Face it, you had to learn my language to get anywhere in life and nobody had to learn yours. You're an honorary cracker now... welcome. Now get back to work.

>>4180679
its literally, skill issues

>>4180679
>sick of reddit because they shit on manual lenses
Wait what why, I've looked at that reddit a few times, and never got that impression

>>4180679
Lmao the single biggest advantage of mirrorless is how it’s superior for manual focus so redditors complain about manual focus on mirrorless

There are in fact very few character lenses with AF

>>4180679
Joining any photography community centered around a specific brand is a mistake, because the focus is inherently gear instead of taking good photos.

>>4179312
polaroid 110 on bottom right.
Nikon fe or fm series on middle shelf right
polaroid 250 or similar top shelf left

Why?

>>4179312
polaroid land camera 250 at the top

Pretty sure the middle camera of the middle shelf is a "Kodak popular 620 Brownie camera"

>>4179312
Bro there's nothing worth stealing there

>>4182410
OK, thanks
Tyrone out

>>4180767
>can fit easily in any day bag
for what purpose? you going take photos of black nothingness inside your bag? lol cool story

Yes, I have
Don't brother, they're shit
You get a similar experience with a pocket printer and printing whatever you take with the the phone

>>4180767
They are fun.
No real purpose other than snapping some pictures of friends and giving it to them.

I like the Instax Wide Printer, you can print anything in real instant chemistry and it looks really sharp.

What type of instant cameras to you reafer to? Like the retro SX-70 style polaroid cameras? Or the new instant cameras you can buy in store like the polaroid go and fujifilm instax?

>>4180524
Bla bla I only take advice from people who take photography seriously enough to own a good camera and most importantly take good photos

>>4180524
>Doesn't deny his portfolio is a single photo of a crane shot from his balcony
>Claims to give good advice when he has absolutely zero experience shooting or with gear
>Tries to simp for his $10 piece of shit plastic camera and budget consumer zoom
>Is obsessed with moop

Your presence on this board is a joke. Post your 10 best photos or admit that you don't belong here.

Guys what is this... 150 posts of incoherent rambling, you should be ashamed of yourselves

>>4180482
and this is why you're a schizo like the rest, its not one person shitting on you, its mostly everyone on this board who doesn't like seeing your shitty advice

File: Phonefag but I got this i(...).jpg (1.41 MB, 1080x2240)

1.41 MB JPG

>>4177130
the sun keeps exposing its massive Vitamin D to the point where every outdoor photographer has to be on constant C drip to counteract the lensflare std's and sensory damage.
also, they play around with every dirty & cheap camera they can get their hands on with no sense of self aspect.
I'm a newfag as well.
here, take my shameless phonefag screensaver I shot.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	CLT-L29
Equipment Make	HUAWEI
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1080
Image Height	2240
Image Orientation	Unknown
Image Created	2023:05:24 08:02:24

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxgXWmFMS7Y

>>4175595
If you can't stand normal, basic functionality turned into unintuitive discordant degree level systems then photography isn't for you.

If you've ever held a fork and wished it was made of 8 different attachable parts which required obscure firmware updates to find the discontinued "fork" setting then you're home.

File: 296161779_162165795823649(...).jpg (312 KB, 1080x1350)

312 KB JPG

ttl = through the lens, your flash will do a small flash, measure with the camera and then send out the right amount of light, get one of these if you can, every make has different flash support

if you have a manual lens, like in the photo set your camera to M and fuck around and find out
shutter speed will not make the flash brighter / darker, it will only let in more ambient light (you most likely can only go up to 1/250 for sync speeds),
aperture lets in more / less light, so you can use this to adjust the amount of flash

once you fuck around a little, you can aim the flash and bounce it off things like walls etc, if you have a sync cable / remote you can fuck around with off camera flash

get some eneloop / ikea recharable batteries, they flashes love em and its free to charge

YouTube university

>>4175595
>too dumb to figure out how to use a basic flash
>>4175629
>too stupid realize the benefit of read a simple manual explaining how to use a flash
>>4175770
>lashes out at others trying to help, calls them retarded
kys