I'm new to taking pictures, this was on a Freight train moving at 60 mph with an A23 android.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelSM-A236UCamera SoftwareA236USQS1AVI1Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)26 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width4080Image Height3060Image OrientationRight-Hand, TopHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2023:01:20 14:24:15Exposure Time1/668 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating20Lens Aperturef/1.8Brightness8.7 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo FlashFocal Length4.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4080Image Height3060Exposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4128853See look I used composition to draw the eyes toward the distance using the dirt path. This leads to the subject which is the pole which is placed according to the rule of thirds
Another example. This grate texture really stood out to me I made it the whole image[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandCommentScreenshotColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1620Image Height2160
Lastly and most obvious I just cropped out the mess that were those grates. They weren’t even parallel with the horizon so they really fucked the image. Next time play with the angle of the shot. The grates look cool so use them to your advantage. I’m imagining placing the phone on the grate so that that way not only is your phone steady but the grate is parallel with the horizon. I think this would actually bring a nice contrast like a sort of nature vs industrial type sovl. Obviously I’m not there but I can imagine if you could get the camera just right the grates could act as a sort of field of grass and the trees would be coming out of the metal earth.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiCommentScreenshotColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1620Image Height2160Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4128853>>4128855>>4128856Op take this advice, it is good advice. A rarity on /p/ and with good examples to boot
Now I made it spooky[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution144 dpiVertical Resolution144 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1620Image Height2160
>Power grid collapse>Economic collapse>Chemical availability nil>Rare earth metal supply crash>No replacement parts can be found or made unless you can source sheet metal and some files>All film factories shut down, premade rolls and canisters a thing of the past>The amount of silver found in one roll of 35mm is worth several hundredHow will you take photos?>inb4 you don't to begin with[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.Camera ModelE-M5MarkIICamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.8 (Macintosh)PhotographerDavid FirmanMaximum Lens Aperturef/4.0Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2017:02:15 09:20:42Exposure Time0.4 secF-Numberf/11.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/11.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceFine WeatherFlashNo Flash, AutoFocal Length14.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
I think not taking pictures will be the least of my worries.I would still shoot a lot tho
the one i have with me
>>4128801>photographic memory
Camera obscura
I don't feel so good...
>>4125556>muh projectionlol you're as predictable as you are unfaithful to your heart>inb4 seethe, cope, dilate, etc.
>>4125546Honestly just do it. I went Nikon > Canon > Sony (mostly keeping my Canon lenses) > CanonAs long as you buy used, you barely make a loss. I even managed to make a profit off some lenses and bodies I flipped
>>4123518Is that melanation I see?
>>4123479i dont care because these cameras have retarded vloggoid screens instead of the superior WLVF larpif i was doing video i'd get a larger, higher quality external display.
>>4123479it gets worse bro>>4128371>Nikonbros on suicide watch
of treating your camera gear like cold mechanical tools instead of an extension of your body, mind and soul?Are there any camera ecosystems that lend themselves to this bond more than others?
>>4125561I don’t think Steinbeck was fetishising his ball point the way OP thinks he was. For a start he probably used a typewriter. He probably didn’t fetishise that either. The ‘pen’ is merely a metaphor for the writers ability to observe and experience the world around him and relate that back to the reader in elegant, convincing prose.But Steinbeck’s typewriter was never an extension of his heart and mind it was merely a conduit through which he gave a physical presence, in the form of printed words, to his experiences in the world beyond his typewriter and the ideas that developed in his head.Likewise an instrument is the conduit that allows a musician to give voice to the sounds in his head and a camera is the conduit that allows the photographer to show their own way of looking at the world around them.Both cameras and musical instruments are expensive things and hobbyists are wont to attach personalities in the form of names or “body, mind and soul” to such inanimate objects. This is mostly to compensate for their shortage of confidence and skill in using them. It also gives them something to blame for their lack of ability and helps foster the excuse that what they are really short of is not so much ability as more gear.
>>4126187>not a single mention of pen or typewriter in quoteummm?? can you into reading?
>>4126188Can you?I suggest you look again and then think about it instead of trying to be a smartass
>>4126199>think about it instead of trying to be a smartassYou must be new here
>>4125561>extension of your body, mind and souldevelopment of organic camera this has integration of camera into your physical body would be epic>getting cronenberg vibes
What is everyone favorite aesthetic lenses? I don't think any one brand has nailed it consistently, but every now and then different manufactures just nail it[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015.5 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2016-09-09T11:44:15+02:00Image Width1078Image Height700
>>4125733For me, its the Canon EF-M lenses. Simple, clean and in gunmetal grey. RIP.
For me it's the Pentax-M look.
>>4126085If only the Zeiss ZM lens caps weren't so fucking bad
For me it's the OM Zuikos. Gorgeous satin black with the best focus modulation of any 35mm SLR lens, period.
I really appreciate the canon FD lenses. The marked s.s.c ones are better made but the nFD ones look nicer without the breach lock mount[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera ModelLM-G710Focal Length (35mm Equiv)5 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width3480Image Height3492Image OrientationUnknownImage Created2023:01:24 00:10:17White BalanceAutoISO Speed Rating200Focal Length4.03 mmExposure Time26/625 secFlashNo FlashF-Numberf/1.6
What's the best Android intervalometer app?My Canon doesn't support physical ones, only way to use one is wirelessly.
>>4125509 what Canon?
>>4127819probably some gimped morrorless>no flash chord>no remote trigger chord>no intervalometer chordIt really is like these mirrorless are just consumer level garbage
Depending on your model, perhaps https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.booman.intervalometer&hl=en&gl=US
>>4127881Sony mirrorless cameras have interval shooting built in, even for the cheap APSC oneshttps://helpguide.sony.net/ilc/1940/v1/en/contents/TP0002686440.htmland all of them support a control cable using the micro USB port
Where does everybody get their framing done? A complete aluminum 18x24 frame with mat and AR glass (requirement) is like $170 at my local shop. Am I skimping to go cheaper? I want it done well.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1080Image Height1080Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4125226>shhaAAAarrrrTTt
I just build my own out of plywood and wall trim
>>4124877>Framingthat shit ain't bussin bro, we printin directly on metal now
>>4124877if you genuinely care about the framed result you need to get in touch with Framestudio in Baku, even for lowly old me they treat me with such professionalism and high attention to detail
>>4127042Baku, as in whoknowshwerestan?
I'm not sure if the camera I want existsI want something that you can take literally anywhere, no matter the time of day or climate, combined with good image quality and durability.Does such a thing exist? Every camera I've been looking at either compromises, or is too large to be feasible. I don't want some giant DSLR fuckhuge camera, I want just a decently portable one that's subtle but still takes good shots
>>4128350X100V
G12>it's old and shitty for nowadaysYeah, that's the point, you won't care it broke
>>4128350What's your budget?
just fucking take one with you
Sounds like you are in the market for a yashica digifilm[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width390Image Height175Scene Capture TypeStandard
do you really need more?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width810Image Height1080
>>4120547no
>>4123616haha mirror go flap
>>4120547I have a 700D and yes I do.You can only do so much against the noise grain, also no 4K.>t. eternal 100 ISO user
>>4120597Not all of us are fat
>>4128692yes, we know twinks only use fuji
Post fumo photos[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.Camera ModelStylusTough-8010Camera SoftwareRawTherapee 5.8Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.9Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width3860Image Height3177Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2023:01:05 09:46:04Exposure Time1/4 secF-Numberf/3.9Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating400Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length5.00 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4126266I can see that they are plushies, but from what anime or manga?
>>4126544From Touhou Project. They're usually limited editions so they're expensive.
>>4120761*basedjak website
Low light Fumo[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS M200Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2023:01:23 23:04:53Exposure Time1/20 secF-Numberf/5.0Exposure ProgramManualLens Aperturef/5.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo FlashFocal Length60.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1280Image Height853RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4122808And I thought I was smart thinking of the same thing.We share the same big brain, anon
what was the most optically perfect lens ever made? google isn't helpful
>>4128581>EXCUSE ME BUT THIS OTHER REVIEW PUT THE PRIMES MARGINALLY HIGHER AT SOME APERTURES AND IN SOME PARTS OF THE FRAME >:( The zoom might be better at further distances and the primes at closer, or vice versa, we are not proferred that information. Did you miss this bit too>the decency level we set about 39-41 lpmm and the best fixed focal lenses have been able to exceed slightly 80 lpmm>our list of record-breakers the Voigtlander Apo Lanthar 50 mm f/2 E (81.0 lpmm) and the Sigma C 65 mm f/2 DG DN (82.7 lpmm)>Sony is the best at longer focal lengths – at 135 mm it exceeds a very high level of 80 lpmm... an outstanding lens, providing you a sensational image quality at every focal length and across the framelmao.>BUT IF I PUT THE SUN IN THE CORNER OF THE IMAGE AT THE RIGHT TIME OF DAY I GET SOEM FLARES AND GHOSTING >:(Is the flare and ghosting a problem in pic related, or do you not see how it could be used effectively? You need such careful positioning to trigger flares you either move 1 degree or wait 10 minutes. who's shooting into the sun with it in the corner of the frame without WANTING ghosting/flares? retards, that's who.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4128607>>4128586>>4128537>>4128537>>4128510>>4128437>>>/hm/
>>4128607>You need to change lenses every five minutesEvent photographers don't get to have opinions.>But this fstoppers article...Don't care. Go ahead and be an NPC and use the lenses "the experts" (a blogger) tells you to have. >Bokeh bad!Which fstoppers article told you that one?>But you must WANT flareNot so much it washes out the whole image>They said it was good thoIt's worse on the short end and sort of keeping up at the long end... not worth it, especially since 200mm is a largely useless focal length except for creepshotting niggas at wedding receptions.
>>4128632i cant imagine shooting an event where you ever have to change from a 65mm except for an organized group shot. sounds like street photography to me.zooms are for people that can't afford multiple primes
>>4128510>instantly brings up lpmmYou have lost already
Joby GorillaPod 5k editionOld >>4117158
>>4128628Did Colin pay rent this month at least?
>>4128629he's too poor to afford that
New >>4128650
The gorilla pod is made like shit and will break easy, good concept though. Didn't even have half the rated weight on it ever
>>4121494I have this combo and it's fantastic. Couldn't ask for something more. Other than upgrading to the newest version with weather sealing (doesn't matter since x-e series doesn't have it anyway) and aperture ring (only really necessary with the newer x-e4 with one less dial)
Holy shit... Nikonbros, we win again... I like the S-Line but being able to shoot Voities like I do on my FM3A has me sold on moving to Z Mount finally
>>4127355You don't even own a camera, why are you here?If you like film so much go hang out on /tv and jerk off over the latest marvel film, retard
>>4127372Please, don't equate /tv/ with this specific nophoto larper.
>>4126364>1/4 the light reaching the sensor>1/4 the sensor areaexactly the same, retard.
>>4127355>>4127265>>4127200>>4127195still waiting for this faggots "magum opus" or whatever.
>>4128016Nope
I really want to get a DSLR again. I've had a mirrorless for a while now, and while it's great, I miss the OVF quite a bit for some reason. What system would be best to invest in? Ideally I want a system that's still made lenses for. I'm guessing both Canon and Nikon no longer make new bodies or new lenses for their DSLR platforms? What am I left with, would Pentax FF or APS-C with its IBIS be good?
>>4126913>implying you could even afford to by a single item from nikon catalog brand newKey the delusions are string with this one
>>4126936As a house owner, yes, yes I can afford.
>>4126913and there's still more high quality stock for less money than pentax shit. pentax has never made exceptionally sharp or aberration free optics. nikon has. the majority of M, F, A, and FA pentax lenses are absolute garbage. and about half the DA and D FA lenses as well.pentax doesn't just have very few (basically no) lenses, they don't have any good lenses. unless you're a "pentaxian" and call everything you shoot sharp because you just spent $500 on a 25 year old lens design from a company that went out of business because they were unable to deliver competitive quality.
>>4126079>I'm guessing both Canon and Nikon no longer make new bodies or new lenses for their DSLR platforms?Nikon still make the D850 and I'm pretty sure they're bringing out more this year.
>>4126079I like the Canon 6D if your budget is low. Lucky for you, DSLRs are cheap as chips.
has anyone had any experience with these off-brand macro tilt shift lenses? I've read before too you can just get adaptors for mirrorless which let you turn any lens into tilt shift but can't seem to find anything
>>4128497if you tilt the back panel you distort the image, you don't change the focus plane
>>4128498I see.I never played with bellows so I'm clueless, now I wonder what AstrHori is doing with the lenses inside, since the tilt seems to be near the mount.
>>4128472>>4128498??? just adjust the cameras position accordingly?
>>4128508what the fuck are you on about?
>>4128512nothing, I just misunderstood your posts lol
