File: 4fr 41328.jpg (1.41 MB, 1691x1211)

1.41 MB JPG

Just a reminder.

• Deadline: December 3.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 20 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	1691
Image Height	1211

File: KEV05088-2.jpg (588 KB, 1536x2048)

588 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6500
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 4.0 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	45 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2020:11:09 03:08:08
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
F-Number	f/1.4
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	500
Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Brightness	-5.6 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Cool White Fluorescent
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	30.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: KEV05121-2.jpg (1.21 MB, 1152x2048)

1.21 MB JPG

>>3766755
This church shot was from a while ago, so it doesn't count, but it has such an obvious triangular theme that I felt like I should share it anyways.
Here's my real submission

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6500
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 4.0 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	45 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2020:11:24 01:16:36
Exposure Time	15 sec
F-Number	f/5.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/5.0
Brightness	-8.1 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	White Fluorescent
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	30.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: triangle.jpg (496 KB, 1920x1280)

496 KB JPG

>>3764313
>criticism welcome
Maybe add a bit of contrast, looks kinda flat for this sort of pic

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6100
Camera Software	Capture One 20 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	6400
Brightness	-8.9 EV
Exposure Bias	-1 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Image Width	1920
Image Height	1280
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: triangle_1.jpg (1.17 MB, 1920x1371)

1.17 MB JPG

For some reason the time/date gets stripped when I upload photos processed in C1. This one is from Nov 20, and >>3767189 is from Nov 26.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6100
Camera Software	Capture One 20 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Exposure Time	1/400 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	320
Brightness	1.6 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Image Width	1920
Image Height	1371
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>3766441

It's motion blur. Try shooting moving cars from another moving car in low light.

File: 2020-11-26_03-03-45.jpg (790 KB, 1371x2048)

790 KB JPG

Cubans take really good.car of their cars.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>3767037
No shit, and it's unacceptable. You fucked up and should have tried again instead of just accepting your failure.
>muh motion blur
That should be isolated to the wheels and road, not the entire subject. Everyone knows this.

>>3765262

Strong Rammstein vibe

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3q8Od5qJio

File: 50560913358_e0699aca71_k.jpg (477 KB, 1638x2048)

477 KB JPG

>>3767033
it's in my opinion the most photogenic car ever, hard to get a bad shot of it

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>3765391
It's got crop video output. Avoid like cancer for video.

https://www.eoshd.com/news/dishonest-misleading-unnecessary-eos-r-and-cropped-4k/

R5/6 are beasts if you can handle cooldown periods. Best iq and rolling shutter performance otherwise. Panasonics have best overall package, either ff S1, S5, S1H, or m43 GH5, GH5s, G9. Fuji's have slightly better iq than m43 Panasonics, but worse features, and some time restriction. Sony's a7sii and siii if you like Snoy, and there's Nikon. Not bad, not special.

>>3765400
I hate hearing that I should switch platforms, but thank you for your comment. I'll give a good look at your suggestions.

>>3765400
>It's got crop video output. Avoid like cancer for video.
If you can live with the 4k crop the output is very good. Basically worse in low light and more demanding on glass, but a fucking awesome bit rate that can take extreme grades.

>Fuji's have slightly better iq than m43 Panasonics
X-T3/4 have IQ equal to the best FF's. I don't know wtf Fuji did in their video processing algorithms, but their output is consistently sharp, detailed, gorgeous.

>>3767149
>X-T3/4 have IQ equal to the best FF's

L O L

Pretty sure it's awesome for stills if you have money to burn. Otherwise avoid.

>>3764994
>>3764927
kek.jpg

File: _R070126.jpg (528 KB, 795x1200)

528 KB JPG

>>3766527
>>3766528

Nice...I actually really like these crops.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	GR II
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.0 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2020:11:09 20:17:27
Exposure Time	1/15 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Brightness	-3.6 EV
Exposure Bias	-1 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	18.30 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal

>>3766796
i believe in you, boat shoes ricoanon. also try wearing jeans

>>3766796
but probably not with boat shoes, necessarily

>>3765192
>and the EVFs are identical.
They're not. As the other anon stated, the EVF for the XE3 is actually noticeably smaller.

File: 201116-M-UR958-1004.jpg (1.9 MB, 3155x4733)

1.9 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS RP
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 9.4 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2020:11:17 14:47:05
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	80.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3760978
>>3762301
>>3762303
>>3762305
Nice what spec ops are these guys

>>3762744
USMC 2d Recon Bn C company

File: C6416CC7-8536-4F92-98F4-E(...).jpg (101 KB, 962x1500)

101 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	962
Image Height	1500
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3754520
the government would (have to) pay out the ass for film processing

snipping tool

>>3765524
irfanview

just right click go to properties in details and delete stuff

>>3766303
those can be recovered with EXsnIFfer.

>>3765524
https://exiftool.org/

File: 4fr 41331.jpg (2.21 MB, 2304x1728)

2.21 MB JPG

>>3766391

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 20 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2304
Image Height	1728

File: 4fr 41332.jpg (2.29 MB, 2304x1728)

2.29 MB JPG

>>3766589

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 20 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2304
Image Height	1728

File: D0A2B74F-20B0-4D31-BA00-1(...).jpg (4.77 MB, 4032x3024)

4.77 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone SE
Camera Software	13.1.3
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	29 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2020:05:10 06:33:00
Exposure Time	1/416 sec
F-Number	f/2.2
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	25
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Brightness	8.6 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	4.15 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4032
Image Height	3024
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

God what a beautiful board this is

File: 7324A3DD-8176-43AC-BBF4-6(...).jpg (1.19 MB, 2048x1363)

1.19 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1363
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3763091
>getting triggered by words
Are you actually autistic?

>>3766466
Dodged a bullet.
>>3766469
>triggered
The only thing that got triggered was my söyboy alert. I'm not helping a söyboy.

>>3762361
ultra-based

>>3766466
>a girl on tinder in Arizona
What did she look like?

>>3763036 >>3763096
olyfags really quiet since this image was posted....

>>3766852
True :,(

“Why would you buy a camera when phones are now better anyway?”

I’ve heard several guys in their 20s say this. They don’t even know each other. Someone’s going around convincing young people that phones have good cameras :,(

>>3766858
It was coined there because /v/edditors are too stupid to dodge the filter and the same is true for discord troons.

>>3766891
They do have good cameras lol, as far as performance is concerned. Creative photography is another matter.

>>3766891
but phone cameras ARE for the most part better than "real" cameras now. convincing yourself otherwise is cope.

>>3766916
Let's not get crazy. The sensor tech is more advanced, the cameras as a whole aren't really better. Despite the tech they struggle at low light.

>>3764965
it has a 19.9MP Super35 Global Shutter CMOS. has there been any cinema CCD cameras?

File: maul.png (1.23 MB, 1920x816)

1.23 MB PNG

>>3766700
You have seen a movie shot with a Sony HDC-750 that had three 2/3" 2MP CCDs. Was it cinematic?

>>3752639
the death of print is a shame

>>3766831
It was too expensive and hard to buy for non-city boys.
Even nowadays a popular japanese book from the mid-70's in rough conditions costs as much as a decent lens. Honestly i would only collect them to scan and dump the PDF out there.

>>3754834
He has said several times it's going to be musical, he has some rad beats but they are for 90's sensibilities.
Lots of house beats and MIDI comedy instruments.

How do portable AC power supplies from hardware stores compare to photog specific ones?
What does pee reccomend for running a PC, some occasional stobe use, and such on location?

>>3767232
>Probably a retarded question, but since they dont have a display are you still able to see how zoomed in the camera is?

The viewfinder displays what the lens sees, so yes

>>3767232
>I was also wondering about lenses and zooming with a traditional film camera. Probably a retarded question, but since they dont have a display are you still able to see how zoomed in the camera is?
On SLRs yes, on viewfinders no, but zoom lenses are rare.

NEW THREAD:
>>3767871
>>3767871
>>3767871

>>3766645
Someone's mad that the A7C wasn't $999

>>3765057
jazz

>>3765057
Perfect
Now stop vaping and smoke real cigs

fat rips yooo

clean your lens bruddy

>>3765743
fuck that

>>3766742
that's some heavily edited photo that sold for a few million or something

on topic tho, i kinda want tatsuo's photobook, looks nice

>>3766747
>tatsuo's photobook, looks nice
It is, you can get his zines too

>>3766752
oh nice i'll check those out too. love how saturated the pages of the photobook seem to be

>>3766753
It’s neat, he got it printed on black paper rather than white so it has a very different feeling to it over a lot of photo books I own.

>>3766759
sick, yeah the zines look good too. he's based never heard of him until this thread

>>3766475
>3766475
It's 2020 for Pete's sake. Just have them do "female" poses.

ask r/traa

dude, if you really want to look good in photo, do solid workout (no overtrain, but definitely well past breaking sweat) and take a selfie then

Since most people cant act for shit, this is your best bet to not look like weak and pretending ass bitch

>>3766475
Take shirt off and flex.

>>3766344
i think he's choking on something. you should go get help

Black friday is almost here and I'm trying to pick up a new lens for ~$300. My only other lens is 35mm f2. This is all for street photography so the options I'm considering are:
- used fuji 18-55 2.8-4.0
- used fuji 50mm f2
- viltrox 56mm f1.4
- viltrox 23mm f1.4

I'm particularly attracted to the viltrox 56mm and think I could be happy with those two focal lengths for a while, but reports of purple fringing are worrisome to me as a SOOC jpeg shooter who probably will never edit the photos in post. How hard is it to avoid high contrast shots that cause fringing when shooting at night? At day? Out of 1000 shots, how many would you think would be ruined by fringing? Also if you have opinions about any of the above lenses I'd be happy to hear it too

>>3766535
Ruined? That’s debatable. Imo fringing is something that only pixel peeping photographers talk about, I’ve never seen street photogs care. The 56mm wil give you an 85mm or so equiv which is a decent zoom, but honestly since you’ve already got the 35mm f2 I’d say go for a wide angle for street. I get more use out of a 24 or 28 equiv for street than my Fuji 56mm f1.2, I use that for portraits. Out of what you pick I’d say get the 23mm for a 35mm equiv. That’s my most used focal length for street

>>3766535
>>3766550
I agree with this anon. There's no need to worry about fringing. You're definitely going to get it if you're shooting in bright light with hard shadows. Nobody besides pixel peepers care. And yeah, for street I'd get a 24mm or something to get you close to a 35mm equivalent. That's goldilocks for street. Honestly, you might be able to get a used Fuji 23mm f/2 for that price range.

>>3766550
>>3766551
Thanks for assuaging my fringing fears. Regarding focal length, I've found myself wanting zoom more than I have a wider lens on my walkabouts. I like the idea of street portraits where a single subject fills more of the frame, also it'll let me get closer in on layered buildings, things across the street, ducks, etc. Viltrox has a 13mm f1.4 on their roadmap for early 2021 so I might consider that for a third lens depending on how it performs