>>3859587
>if I posted it as my own you'd tear me to shreds

100% false you just suck ass

>>3860128
Exaggerated colours, but everything else looks normal. There's blue in the shadows of the foreground, trunk of the tree is dark. The other two have different colour scheme for the background alone.

>>3859608
oh god i didnt know he was hot

>>3861494
If that counts as hot I'm a greek god.

>>3860125
very interesting

File: Screenshot_20210408-19585(...).jpg (1.87 MB, 1080x2220)

1.87 MB JPG

>>3859291
It appears to be just 1 dng file but I don't know for sure
I never used this feature on my phone I have a real camera it's just piqued my interest

>>3859291
Yes you actually get RAW DNG support on most modern phones. Full on sensor level data before demosaicing and denoising. You also get vignetting because the RAW doesn't de-vignette the photos either. It's just as raw as DSLR raws. Hot pixels and all, which you can map out in RAW editors.

All it requires on Android is Camera2API support. That's been mostly standardized now, however older phones including flagships (Like, a Galaxy S5 for example) cannot ever shoot RAW.

Even some burner tier phones (Sub $80) offer RAW support, if not in the main pre-installed camera app then it's often still accessible through something like OpenCamera or Lightroom or any other decent camera app.

Smartphones don't have great sensors but they do typically have very wide relative apertures so they let a lot of light in. Moto G Power is f/1.8 I think. To get an equivalent of that in a DSLR you're looking at some fancy glass and due to the objective size of the elements and sensor you get a lot of bokeh on a DSLR but f/1.8 on a minuscule sensor actually has a surprisingly wide depth of field. Pinhole camera physics and all that are the reason. The widest the IXUS 185 goes is f/3.2 but if you zoom in it closes up to f/6.9 which is rather dark.

A typical smartphone at 100 ISO is kinda like a P&S at 400 ISO in terms of sensitivity, that's why they're so good in low light.

If some manufacturer would release a fixed zoom point and shoot with a wide aperture and RAW support with a little CCD sensor it would fucking BTFO all smartphones but sadly they all stick with meme zooms with gimped apertures and none really have RAW support without them being more expensive "Pro" grade point and shoots.

>>3859261
>these things have much larger sensors and actual lenses
no they don't, get with the times grandpa
IXUS 185: 1/2.3"
OnePlus 9 Pro: ~1/1.5"
https://www.oneplus.com/ro/9-pro/specs

smaller numbers under the fraction line mean larger numbers in case you didn't know

>>3861588
>flagship chinese meme phone
Of course you'll find some outliers but in general a phone in the same price range as a point and shoot will have a smaller sensor.

>>3861598
of course but who the fuck buys a 100€ phone, that's e-waste tier

File: DSCF4001.jpg (967 KB, 1100x1100)

967 KB JPG

Alright /p/, that's it for this thread. As always, I welcome critique and feedback, hope you guys enjoy.

>>3857264
Fucking faggot

>>3857490
>>3861502
This is why we can’t have nice photo threads

>>3861528
This isn't a nice photo thread either way. Most of these pics are snapshit tier and it's honestly embarassing they all have this white border as if they're worth something.
Whatever the case may be being a faggot is heavily frowned upon in this website and for a good reason, pictures of a flag that represents mentally ill people deserve nothing but scorn.

where bobs?

>>3860242
I thought about getting it but I bought a Canon RF f/2 85mm instead

Did I do it wrong?

Imagine paying anything more than a couple hundred for a samyang

>>3861287
do you like it?

>>3860242
I got this lens last year for portraits and it does a pretty damn good job. I haven't really missed focus unless it's with a lot of crazy movement. I think it is worth it if you don't want to spend the extra cash on the sigma.

>>3861315
I have not even really used it
I just got it because I had a gift card

Theres actually a minor religion on Vanuatu which worships him as a sort of god. They have been waiting for his miraculous second coming ever since his last visit in 1974.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Philip_Movement

Who wants to tell them?

File: 5b19a3e31ae6621f008b4da0.jpg (166 KB, 1200x900)

166 KB JPG

>>3860174
that's cool, if I tell them, will I then become their god?

>>3860213
You're more likely to become a delicious stew, with your balls turned into a small purse.

Why has England been so long without a king? Shouldn't it be the law that there's a king? Maybe have a king & a queen but not force them to marry, that's the ticket.

>Any advice on how to make money on it.
You don't.

>Any alternatives?
Adobe Stock, iStock, Alamy

>Is product photography a better idea?
>product photography in the 3D Modelling era

>>3861153

>You don't.

Why not ?
I don't need a lot of money

bump

>>3861156
Because the market is cornered already. Stock photography is about making pictures that fit random tags before someone else does them.
See this guy:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yuri_Arcurs

>>3861156
>I don't need a lot of money
Trust me, you do. You need a lot of money to compete with this guy lol. The dude has an industrial greenhouse he uses as a daylit studio, full of props, from stoves to microscopes,. Good luck matching that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYkNKP96b84

>>3851891
>tamron 70-180

Love this lens. I was waiting for Sigma's 70-200 sony mount but it never surfaced and zince Tamron beat them to the punch I decided to go with them especially after using the 28-75. No regrets at all. I don't miss the extra 20mm to get to 200 and I can easily hit crop mode or use the 1.4x zoom feature in cam (a7m3) if I do want to get slightly closer but retain quality.

File: 1587186738114.jpg (686 KB, 3399x4105)

686 KB JPG

>>3853522

File: 13867912326197634281.jpg (3.53 MB, 6016x4016)

3.53 MB JPG

>>3861098
Yeah I love mine after using it more these past few days. Pic related the background separation you get is so good. I'm strongly considering getting their aps-c 17-70 as well.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6400
Camera Software	RawTherapee 5.8
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	222 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6016
Image Height	4016
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2021:04:10 15:06:13
Exposure Time	1/400 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	7.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	148.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: laughing-guy.jpg (23 KB, 400x401)

23 KB JPG

>>3859435
>>Calling yourself a real photographer

I use the same thing at beaches to get foot pics or cleavage shots if they are sitting nicely.
>Inb4 creep
Erm...it's just a hobby haha

>>3861048
>Many of your photos do not stand out to me in the title Strasbourg.
that was exactly my point, people visit Strasbourg and see the exact same thing as you would if you simply google it, I think it's a shame considering you can go on the very close outskirts and find yourself in a city that's not the Strasbourg you expected. But that's just a question of taste. Either way, I'll take pics of the old city at some point, this is just a shoot between dozen others after all.

>I find it hard to see your focus or I often think the framing is contrary or unfavorable to what is shown.
I really appreciate this, do you have some kind of example ?

File: 09-14-02-18#015.jpg (39 KB, 667x1000)

39 KB JPG

>>3860119
>I honestly am quite sick of the traditional houses
The old part offers lots of opportunities and I always enjoy my stay there.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2901
Image Height	4416
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Created	2018:02:14 19:09:01
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	667
Image Height	1000

File: 20201214_144603.jpg (4.63 MB, 4032x2268)

4.63 MB JPG

>>3861220
aw man, that's unfair, this is one of my favourite places in the whole of Strasbourg, the little courtyard further down this path is amazing. sorry for the pic related taken with a phone, but it's really worth the sight.

don't get me wrong, I love Alsace in general, and there's nothing wrong with the traditional houses, it's just that I wanted some change

File: 09-14-02-18#004.jpg (172 KB, 667x1000)

172 KB JPG

>>3861242
I get what you by saying you wanted a change.
Don't forget all the nice bridges. We even did the boat tour once.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2943
Image Height	4522
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Created	2018:02:14 18:29:02
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	667
Image Height	1000

File: edit-21-03-18#010.jpg (146 KB, 667x1000)

146 KB JPG

>>3861411
*mean

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2880
Image Height	4416
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2018:03:23 18:37:39
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	667
Image Height	1000

>>3860216
Nice blogpost, faggot

>>3860245
>nice shitpost, faggot

>>3859627
Don't forget, thanks to IS you can move the sensor for T&S effects.

>>3860669
Not tilt, but shifting to some degree. Not much but gives you leverage to fine tune your composition

>>3859627
>I've been wanting to change brand and the Pentax K-3 caught my attention
>What lens would you recommend for street/buildings photography ?

I have a K3. I'd say either the Zeiss Distagon 35mm f2. Or if that lens is too big for your taste, then the 43mm limited, it's just very handy.

>>3858025
Good. I'd just area manipulate the bright background to the left a little so it stands out less than the subject.

>>3858028
A bit of perspective correction would help this one.

The models you shot are very vulgar, hoop earing, lip fillers, heavy makeup, wearing sneakers, poor sense of fashion in general...

I think that's the main issue here but that's a purely subjective advice. Your portraits would be so much more interesting if your subject were. Try looking for more unique individuals, that is why high end models are always unconventionally attractive.

>>3852025
Muh dynamic range.txt

>>3857456
More of this model? Please post.

>>3860924
awfully overdone makeup

>>3861182
He said you can't name "moooooom exposure is hard please hold my hand."

>>3861071
The body might be smaller and lighter but most mirrorless lenses are enormous beasts.

>>3861182
I honestly don't think exposing in most situations is difficult enough to justify having to drain battery just to look through the lens, but to each their own.

>>3861176
not in the sense of "live view camera"

>>3859686
>How does it feel to be wrong dslretards?

>fast forward 15 years
>camera technology made giant leaps
>cameras will AI compose, shoot and edit your pics when and how their algos see it fit
>Meanwhile decades old Pentax DSLRs, still functioning bcs built like tanks, are highly prized luxury items

Olympus Zuiko OM lenses are nice and decent and easy to adapt. They're more expensive these days on Ebay than when I got them tho

Also the auto chinon lenses are fairly affordable and alright, altho need to test those out again

File: 20210410-DSC00767.jpg (721 KB, 1831x1030)

721 KB JPG

>>3861035
Tair-11a. A little bit of swirl with a Sonnar sharpness. Can't beat 20 blades.
Industar 61 L/Z has a "ninja star" aperture. Meyer Optik Görlitz Trioplan 100mm f/2.8 for "bubble bokeh".

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7RM3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	135 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2021:04:10 20:56:08
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	50
Brightness	1.4 EV
Exposure Bias	-2 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	135.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard

>>3861064
>Tair-11
this looks fucking gorgeous. lovely stuff

I'm planning to get an Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II body, what is the most affordable and effective vintage lens for street photography / architecture ?

>>3861164
There's nothing good and affordable there, honestly.

Most affordable vintage wide angle lenses suck, MFT will double that, 28mm is the most easily obtainable wide angle lens and that's 56mm on your Oly. Not that i have anything against vintage glass but very wide + MFT is not a good combo. Get the 20mm f1.7 or the 14-42 kit lens.

File: 14 bit raw.jpg (537 KB, 1920x1080)

537 KB JPG

>>3861135
hmm id rather not coz im shy, altho here's a still with the 14 bit raw from the camera with some film convert slapped on so you can get an idea of its capabilities. To me it kinda looks like an old timey 70s documentary film aesthetic

>>3861138
>id rather not
why the fuck would you make a whole ass thread then if you won't even post anything
use a gear thread next time you dingus

>>3861139
alright fine ill post some wee clips from the camera to show its capabilities, one sec

>>3861138
I like the look of it OP, they're right, post your work why would you care about people on the internet you will never meet and never hear from again when the thread ultimately 404 ? I mean this is an anonymous image board we don't know who you are

Could be very useful to get a look of the Canon capabilities

>>3861144
im not sure ill link to the actual work coz most of it was done before I learned about the RAW video stuff so it looks shit in comparison, but will post some wee clips im making atm

>>3860812
go look up ebay or literally any auction site, retard

File: 1588200449903.jpg (179 KB, 1300x720)

179 KB JPG

>>3860812
>https://www.kentfaith.com/sone-nex-e-mount-adapter/KF06.440_new-product-kf-m15105-md-nex-pro-20-year-high-precision-lens-adapter-orange

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OLYMPUS CORPORATION
Camera Model	E-PL8
Camera Software	Polarr Photo Editor
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Color Filter Array Pattern	742
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2020:04:30 00:40:39
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Exposure Time	3.2 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	High
Sharpness	Hard
Image Width	1300
Image Height	720

>>3860895
https://www.amazon.com/s?k=minolta+md+adapter&ref=nb_sb_noss_2
Maybe you should choke on that spoon

>>3860965


This is how I read the OP too.

OP, I don’t think you’ll have any luck adapting lenses from other systems onto your camera, but there’s a shitload of old minolta glass out there. The lenses are often referred as being MC or MD, the mount is actually called SR.

I swear when I got my srt-100 the manual advertised an m-mount adapter but I no longer have those that things, the internet yields nothing about it.

>>3858443
>The photo on the left isn't "worse" than the one on the right.
You're right. They both have tilted horizons, so they are both equally trash.

>>3858450
If they were on the brink of falling off of page 10 it's because they didn't get enough bumps to survive or were close to bump limit you dumb reddit fuck. Learn how an imageboard works and look up what an archive is before acting retarded online.

>>3858443
what kind of rule of thirds you think you follow with a tilted horizon line?

>>3859761
The lines of thirds shouldn't go through the subject, but should rather edge it (i think, someone clarify coz im a noob)

>>3861057
Composition rules are guidelines about what often looks good. Not recipes with exact measures.