>bondage editionare you a thick-neck chad or shoulderlet kind of strap guy?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 60DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2020:11:16 13:07:33Exposure Time1/40 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/2.8Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length40.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4304546You could have always posted evidence of your extravagant wealth like your leica on the hood of your BMW in your 3 car garage but I have a feeling your dad doesn't let you in the garage
>>4304549like I'm going to run around my house taking pics of expensive stuff just because some poorfag is envious of my 80 dollar camera straphope the bus is at least airconditioned in whatever 3rd world hellhole you live
>>4304551>no, i dont even have a cameraprotip, you can take a photo of your camera by setting it in front of a mirror.
>>4304559anon you might be retarded
>>4304340Strap! The one in pic related is like 10€ on amazon. It's very comfortable because the rope is very thick. The most important part is that it's very sturdy because all connections are megal. >>4304508It's not really abot dropping the camera. I like the strap because "sometimes" you need two hands and several lenses are not pocketable. I never carry my camera like this btw >>4304343
My camera has been sitting in the corner for like for ever and I've finally decided to get into photography. However I don't know where to start: do you have any book or youtube channel to recommend in order to learn the basics? I would like to do mostly model like shootings
>>4303150This. Just play with the settings, shooting the same scene to watch it change, you do not need to read shit and most photographers are schizoid midwits so reading shit might confuse youProper education was for film, especially film with flash, and yes even then the best photographers learned by experimenting.
>>4303409>picture.with the problempicture without the problem
>>4303067Have you already read and understood the owners' manual of your camera? Those tend to include basics and how to deal with it using that camera.
>>4303079That's probably the best book out there for learning photography. Read it, go out and take lots of pictures, then read it again.
>>4303067>book to learn the basicspeople on this board will literally do anything but go outside and take photos
and even though i as a 40 year old millennifart boomer often shit on gen-z i think it is kinda cool. Just imagine them going to whatever social gathering they are assembling in, bringing out all these cool semi-vintage digicams that nobody gave 2 shits about until recently..The market is absolutely booming right now.. they want it all. The shittiest model you can imagine? Guess what.. they want it and they want to pay more than yesterday.In certain niche markets these things sell for even above ebay prices which is insane.Gen-z is unironically making photography fun again?It is also quite interesting to think about the conditions that made this possible in the first place. So what happened exactly? My viewpoint is the following:Younger Gen-z social media users have only used cellphones for photography.. they have finally realized that the platform has limitations.. they look at pictures their parents took of them when they were kids using digicams and want that particular look etc, meanwhile the large camera companies have completely neglected this market segment thanks to plebs only using their phones. just look at Canon for instance.. they haven't released a single Ixus model in 7 years and their last hoorah was nothing special in terms of specifications so we have to go back even further to find their high end models. Other companies have done the same.. there is nothing to be seen from the likes of Nikon, Sony, Olympus, Fuji, Samsung or any of the companies that for years made these ultra-compact and cool looking cameras.It find it all really strange. You have a generation that simply loves this type of stuff and nothing to sell them. Just imagine these cameras with updated hardware, maybe some fresh colors and "limited edition" varieties.Also feel free to post pics of cool digicams.
>>4285524>It is also quite interesting to think about the conditions that made this possible in the first place.older point and shoot cameras have way more soul then cellphones. modern cell phones look good but they have crazy amounts of automatic post processing. also small sensors with high megapixel count has the effect of making photos look soulless. then you sprinkle a CCD sensor and you got a winner. I think I helped start this trend and the A590 has been on of my favorites.
>>4303821Marty’s mom really needed to do some hardcore gonzo titty worship porno in her prime and it’s an unforgivable sin that she didn’t tbqhwy
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon DIGITAL IXUS 960 ISCamera Softwaredarktable 4.6.1Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.9Focal Length (35mm Equiv)36 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:04:15 14:20:57Exposure Time5029/1000000 secF-Numberf/7.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating74Lens Aperturef/7.9Exposure Bias0 EVSubject Distance65.54 mMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length7.70 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1920Image Height1440
>>4285524Get ahead of the curve and start buying vintage DSLRs before it's too lateThey're already more expensive because they were always expensive, from launch. Are you ready for the future of $1200 D800s and people paying near MSRP for old EOS lenses?
>>4304500>Only $100!? This "film" camera takes infinite photos!>Don't order that mirrorless until you've tried THIS>REAL FILM GRAIN ON DIGITAL! Nikon D2x in 2024>Which one will people choose? D700 vs Z8 BLIND TEST
How the fuck do I get the angle right? It has never been my experience to have a dish in front where it's super puper obvious what exactly is worth showing. pic attached is one way to go about it, escpecially with lunch boxes where every slot should be shown, but is there a rule of thumb for angling? should i just go along with my guts on it? can't help but feel that i could have done a better job of a dish just by tilting the plate a tad.
i think you should build the meal around the angle rather than the other way around.food photography is so extremely fake to begin with, its basically a diorama but its edible (sometimes it isnt tho lmao)im really just talking out of my ass here btw ive never done food photography in my lifeoh and stick to one light source to illuminate the whole meal, makes for good highlights
>>4299256I like top down to show plating and portions, but the meal can't be hot or you'll fog your lens - at least from my experience shooting in a lightbox.I got sick of having to eat my incredible meal cold to be able to photo it, so I just take a quick phone snap and chow down now.
>>4299256Try using a 4x5 camera.
>>4299256Your food'll go cold if you do this shit. Just eat your meal instead of being some posh git, leave photography for more interesting subjects.
>>4299256An easy trick is dropping the food, you could of held a grape above the meal and photographed it falling, and then the money shot of it bouncing up in the air while the rest of the food gets slightly bumped.Best result is you need a 2nd person to just drop the plate of food and then you shoot as it hits the table and the food bounces.
Are you preparing for the eclipse? I just slapped a filter on my cheap 300mm tamron, no idea what I'm doing but I read a few things online.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D3400Camera Softwarepaint.net 5.0.13Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern14352Focal Length (35mm Equiv)450 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:03:28 17:46:05Exposure Time1/500 secF-Numberf/6.3Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating800Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length300.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width6000Image Height4000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4303560>to show that i planed in advanceAnd planning that firmly in advance for a weather-dependent event is still retarded even if you were lucky. What if the nearest clear skies were 100 milss or more from the hotel?
>>4303598He'd have a nice vacation for cheapWhy are you so mad?
From Lancaster, PA. Nikon D800 and 80-200mm F/2.8 D[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:04:08 16:20:29Color Space InformationsRGB
>>4303599pretty sure he is mad because he waited till the last minute to go somewhere and still cucked by clouds.>>4303598nigger, as you can see in my picture i have a 11 month old, i'm not driving hundreds of miles out of my way at the last minute with a baby screaming in my backseat for hours because some faggy weatherman told me to. also you clearly dont regularly look at weather reports if you think they're ever accurate. the entire two weeks ahead of the eclipse it was said indianapolis was going to have either mostly cloudy or rain as the weather on monday. the skys were clear the entire time. the only time i even had rain was for like an hour on tuesday when i went to the zoo.anyways where even are your eclipse pics itt?
just wanted to brag about my eclipse pic after seeing all of yours. >is it post processed yes>is it overexposedyes>is it still better than the others hereyes sir
ITT: previous work from more than 10 years ago that you shotI'm doing a huge data migration and have had a second look at all of my early stuff when I had a Digital Rebel. I'll post stuff as I get through it and see it. This particular one is 2011.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTiCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows)PhotographerunknownMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:03:27 22:09:36Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4302317[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
>>4302310Trains are classy because they can have amenities on boardA bus is just cramming 50 dirty hobos into a hollowed out and stretched VW beetle
>>4302412japan can do busses right[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 5D Mark IVCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/4.0Image-Specific Properties:Image Width6720Image Height4480Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Pixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2017:08:21 17:01:12White Point Chromaticity0.3Exposure Time1/30 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating1250Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length17.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1654Image Height1102RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4298895I regret never getting to see a shuttle launch. Based dude.
>>4301854The building's called Alba Nova, but NORDITA seems like the kind of people whod' hang out there.
Took this photo of a cute lovely bird[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot SX120 ISMaximum Lens Aperturef/6.3Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaLens Size6.00 - 60.00 mmFirmware VersionFirmware Version 1.00Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution180 dpiVertical Resolution180 dpiImage Created1980:01:01 00:04:05Exposure Time1/1600 secF-Numberf/4.3ISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/4.3Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length60.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3648Image Height2736RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeManualFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeSharpnessNormalSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeManualImage SizeLargeFocus ModeSingleDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingFineMacro ModeNormalSubject Distance13.630 mWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed192Image Number130-1950
>>4239795i have one
>>4296093that very nice, more birds the better[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6000Camera SoftwareCapture One 23 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/8.0Focal Length (35mm Equiv)97 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiExposure Time1/15 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/8.0Brightness5.0 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length65.00 mmImage Width1800Image Height1200RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastHardSaturationHighSharpnessSoft
bump thread of photos
>>4279965comfy/10
>>4275675super cute
>forces you to use a tripod or set your ISO to 256 million in low light>forces you to use an ND in daylightwhen will this shit technology improve?
>>4303980>sensor can only be used once before necessitating complete replacementlol, lmao even>baked in color, requires changing entire sensor for different gradespfft what a joke format
>>4303985I wouldn’t know
I wish we'd get CCD sensors back
>>4304010Your behavior exposes the lie.
>>4304033If you say so
Just received this. Going to give it 2 weeks and then probably sell my XT4 and lenses if I love it.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelGalaxy S23 UltraCamera SoftwareS918BXXS3BXBDMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Focal Length (35mm Equiv)23 mmSensing MethodNot DefinedImage-Specific Properties:Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)Image Height3000Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:03:28 16:01:26Vertical Resolution72 dpiHorizontal Resolution72 dpiImage Width4000Lens Aperturef/1.7Exposure Bias0 EVExposure ProgramNormal ProgramColor Space InformationUncalibratedUnique Image IDEK0XLPE00VMBrightness-1.0 EVWhite BalanceAutoExposure ModeAutoExposure Time299/10000 secFlashNo FlashF-Numberf/1.7ISO Speed Rating640Digital Zoom Ratio3Focal Length6.30 mmMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardLight SourceUnknown
>>4304234NTA but you have shit reading comprehension. They're saying FF lens on a FF sensor (ie not squeezed down) is better than a FF lens squeezed down with optics. Optics soften.
>>4304234>a mount converterWon't "squeeze" or otherwise mess around with the light because it doesn't contain any lenses.
>find mju II for 20€ in mint conditions>shoot 2-3 films with it>put on ebay sell for 300€>need money to repair my ga645Many such cases
>>4303534>>4303535>>4303540OK thanks, guess I'm stalking eBay for a good unit.
>>4304240if optics softenedall the expensive high end lenses wouldn't be so big????
Prolly late to the party but here they are. The weather sucked, my tripod sucked, and I sucked. That said I had a lot of fun and an eclipse is worth seeing.
And last one.
Why did you make a new thread for this
>>4304185because OP is a faggot and thinks he was the only one to take photos of the eclipse
>>4304104We were cloudier. I got nothin' during totality. Glad you managed something.
>>4304194Alcohol is a hell of a drug. Just didn't see the other thread. :l
The We'll actually post photos editionPrevious thread >>4300690/fgt/ daily reminder (courtesy by anon): one stop per decade is (generally) bullshit>negative film ages better than positive>black and white better than color>slow films better than fast>storage conditions (dry/cool) matter more than years>Negative film is shot 1 or 2 stops overexposed and then PULLED in development so that you build more density in the exposure and develop less such that the fog is limited>slide/positive film is shot at box speed or overexposed and pulled.>if you home develop you can also use benzotriazole as a restrainer for the the first developer in E6 processUseful linksComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4304472This is one of the simplest designs for an enlarger. It's called the intrepid enlarger, and they look pretty cool. It's like a reverse 4x5 camera. Fairly inexpensive, but you can get cheaper off ebay.
NEEEEEEEWWWWWWWWWW
>>4304682Do it, bro. Make a new one. If I do it I'm going to mildly annoy a handful of easily annoyed people with my picture and edition choice.
>>4304705>>4304705>>4304705>>4304705
landscape pic from last yearFoma 100, Pentax Program & kit zoom[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeReflectaCamera ModelProScan 7200Camera SoftwareVueScan 9 x64 (9.8.13)Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1258Image Height838Compression SchemeUncompressedHorizontal Resolution1800 dpiVertical Resolution1800 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2023:08:20 19:17:34Image Width1258Image Height838
• Theme: Imitation• Deadline: From 17 March to 7 AprilTheme:• Submissions have to try replicate a specific work of art (a painting, another photograph)• You have to include the name and author of the original• You are not limited in what works you can replicate. If You'd like you can also replicate other submissionsRules:• Photo must be taken during the timeline. Images taken before this thread was started won't count.• Post images with exif, if possible. If you can't, just state that they were taken during the timeline.• Three entries per photographer max.• A day after the competition ends, all valid images will be posted for voting.Optional:Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4302285nicely done. what is your reference piece?
>still no new challenge
>>4302861Why thank you, what an honor. I just can't stop winning I guess. >>4302956https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabbage_Leaf
ed weston btw, I guess I was supposed to include that with the entry
>STILL no new challengeOP got his foreskin stuck in a deli slicer and didn't survive.RIP.
What are some rules or tricks that will help you get better at taking photos?The one i have so far is only 1 shot per scene. No more 20 shots burst.What do you do to help you get better?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.32Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:03:29 13:24:57Color Space InformationsRGB
>tricks that will helpSpacewalk into tre flip
>>4299193expose for the shadowsdevelop for the highlights
>>4299193Read cinematography books and acquire a wealth of ideas.One shot per scene doesn't seem like a good idea, any given amount is a bad idea IMO. If anything learn to previsualize so you can get worthy photos.
>>42991931 shot per scene is the opposite of what you should doBracket, OVFs are too low res, EVFs need too much zoomy scrolly. Most good photographers bracketed and worked their negatives in the darkroom and now they edit their raws, same shit. Ansel adams left behind hundreds of practice negs, most street photographers left behind thousands of unused photos.You're conflating photography with marksmanship - one shot one kill.
>>4303943>conflating with marksmanshipWhat, you don’t take your fotosnaiper out on your photo walks? U gay or sumthin?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1600Image Height840Scene Capture TypeStandard
Post fumo photosold thread>>4120462
more film fumography[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeMinoltaCamera ModelScan Dual IICamera Softwaredarktable 4.4.2Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:04:08 15:56:49Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width3631Image Height2487
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.Camera ModelE-510Camera SoftwareVersion 1.1Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationLeft-Hand, BottomHorizontal Resolution314 dpiVertical Resolution314 dpiImage Created2024:03:26 16:25:32Exposure Time1/25 secF-Numberf/4.5Exposure ProgramCreativeISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, AutoFocal Length64.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3648Image Height2736RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypePortraitGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationHighSharpnessSoft
Fujicolor Cirno[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.Camera ModelSP-3000Camera SoftwareFUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. FE FDi Service Software / FRONTIER355/375-3.0-0E-490Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:04:10 00:21:00Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width4535Image Height3035
can I join the Fumo /p/ club as an absolute novice and without an actual Fumo?
>>4303934Do you use image editing/camera management software? I did use a user script for quick compression on the reply window, I didn't knew it strips all metadata from the images
Why is it that when I'm spotted with my camera trying to take a picture of something people immediately come up and also take a picture in the same direction using their smartphones? They don't even know why or what I am looking at.Is this mental Illness of not wanting to be left out?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpi
>>4295676most of these "people" barely deserve to be called human. The right thing to do would be to incinerate them but since we live in a society all I can tell you is to ignore them like you would insects
>>4295609They don't know it's rude.
>>4295609its like all those chumps staring at things through their phone instead of enjoying life
>>4295609Probably because youre a gwc photographing tourist attractions
>>4299037awesomepost one of those pics please
