w/ one medium sized lens (Nikkor 28mm) attached? and pocket for charger/USB stick/SDs?Any good brands or models?
the one you have with you
>>3681015fpbp okay thanks anoni went with an a****nbasics small holster pouch, it looks like exactly what i wanted for taking on extremely long hikes. mods pls close the thread thx u.
>>3681012I used this thing in the past.It's OK.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareCapture One 20 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Width864Image Height1152
>>3677821calibrate your screens and it'll look meh on all of them
>>3677899Abandoned office building, now home to alot of homeless people. The stairwells are absolutely disgusting.
>>3677799>>3677801Its a beautiful photograph
>>3677589
>>3677589>>3677590>>3677591>>3677592>>3677593cumfy pitchers OP, reminds me a lot of my childhood woods back home[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot S70Camera SoftwareArcSoft PhotoStudioImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2013:07:18 17:17:49Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/5.3Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo FlashFocal Length20.69 mmImage Width921Image Height1228
https://thephotonthief.com/homestead/Wanted to share. This was a personal project I've been meaning to do for a while.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7M2Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 5.3 (Android)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)35 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Created2020:07:04 11:27:14Exposure Time1/640 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/1.8Brightness3.7 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length35.00 mm
>>3680932very nice and touching. You can see this comes from the heart.have you tried doing a slideshow with the images instead? scrolling can be a little tedious and sometimes you can't get a whole image to fit in the screen all at once.or maybe keeping the images smaller but being able to click to expand them.
>>3680938Tried a slideshow. It's what I usually use for my other pages but here the stacked thing works best. I wanted the photos to be big on a monitor.
How heavily do you edit your photos? Do you only use lightroom kind of edits? do you ever add something that isnt there? does the photo ever rely on how it will be edited? Ive been doing a few photos following the theme of pareidolia which involves me (attempting to) subtly blending outside material into the photo to get the effect. Should I keep working on my editing skills or is it better to just let the photo speak for itself?
>>3680544>do you ever add something that isnt there?>More often than not I take away things rather than add them.I always thought that would be the case when I started editing more of my photos but ive found myself doing the opposite a lot more. That being said im still an amateur so that trend could change. obviously once you notice something in the image is added in post you cant unsee it and it breaks any sort of immersion (pic related) , but i like to think it is possible to eventually learn to do so consistently without it being so obvious.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2020:06:15 00:54:51
>>3680583I like the one on the left more honestly. Do you have flickr or insta?
>>3680885seconded
>>3680373>heavy editIn most cases no, sometimes yes. The "heavy" edits happen when it's required, or - I'll admit it - sometimes because I fucked up>lightroom kind of editsI'm not sure what this means.>adding stuff that isn't there.Never. I will, however, detract things via clone stamp or content aware fill etc...it's something I've gotten better at avoiding (unwanted shit in the shot) but every so often I'll shoot something knowing I need to crop out an errant sign pole or something because there was no other way to do it.>does the photo ever rely on how it will be editedIn cases where I know I need to do something like deep shadow pulling or pano stitching absolutely. Even after "getting it right in the camera" there's more than basic tweaking necessary to get what my eyes saw/what I wanted[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D850Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2018 (Windows)PhotographerIan LindoMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern878Focal Length (35mm Equiv)50 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2020:02:29 12:14:34Exposure Time1/13 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating31Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeOtherLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1500Image Height1200RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>3680927Nikon shooters everybody
Portraits of any kind, as long as you took them.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS-1D X Mark IICamera SoftwareSnapseed 2.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.4Image-Specific Properties:Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Pixel CompositionRGBHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2020:04:20 14:41:23Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/7.1Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating5000Lens Aperturef/7.0Exposure Bias-2 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length85.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1333Image Height2000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>3673112>>3673113>>3673114Sup Iggy!
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 5D Mark IIIMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiF-Numberf/2.5Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating800Shutter Speed1/100 secExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFocal Length85.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedExposure ModeManual
>>3681452Where tf do you guys get all those hot but hairy chicks? I'm asking for a friend, obviously.
>>3683014Just sorta my social circle these days.
>>3683097Damn I wish I wasn't cripplingly autistic.
How do I become a crime scene photographer? Got a lot of college colleges under my belt and I’m proficient in analog and developing.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1024Image Height683Scene Capture TypeStandard
Did you take law and/or anthropology? Chemistry?
>>3679918Become a cop/forensics specialist. They don't hire crime scene photographers, they hire forensic specialists and teach them how to use a camera in 2 weeks
You know what you have to do.
>>3679918As other other anon pointed out, this job doesn't exist anymore. From an artistic standpoint Naked City by Weegee was released 75 years ago so stop beating a dead horse. If you want to see a contemporary fact-fiction based crime(not exactly crime but it's related to politic investigation on local complaints) investigation then checkout Slant by Aaron Schuman.It's your choice is to take it as a hobby and work on a photobook project with your unique perspective.
>>3679918How do I become a crime scene photographer?>buy pedo glasses>dress blandly>wear a cap>get an old-ish car>drive around until you find a hitchhiker>take him/her in, promise to drive them where they wanna>drive them into a creepy-ass remote cabin instead>get a chainsaw>chop chop>jerk off on their naked body parts>take pictures with a medium of choiceCongrats, you've now photographed your first crime scene. Good luck next time!
Hello /p/ I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask, but I figure it's worth a shot.Many years ago my son died, he was two weeks away from his due date, he made it so far only to have his life cut short. It was over a day before his mom could give birth to him. The Hospital was kind enough to take photographs of him so we could have something to remember him by, but It hurts so much seeing my boy like that. I'd like to get a headstone picture for his grave, but I want to use a picture of him filled with life.How would I best go about getting this done?(sorry for the typos It's very hard to type right now)
>>3676731The hospital did exactly as you *said, and
>>3676731Rough time man. Life is shit but each day can be brighter if you let. If no one will do it for you post again and if I notice I'll see if i can hook you up remotely.
>>3676637bump to save the thread
>>3676697I’m so glad that you are still here, Natureguy!
God bless your soul anon and God bless your son. We’ll all get to be together again.
PNG vs JPG
PNG when you have transparency, vectors or text. JPG for everything else.
.gif
>>3680431I don't want that kinda ugly checkboard pattern on my pictures so I choose JPG.
>>3680481
>>3680693literally the first letter in png says it is not for vector.
Does anyone here have an infrared modified DSLR?What is it really like? I'm thinking about getting a modified one. Which mod would be the best? One where the blocking filter is just removed or one where they not only removed the blocking filter but also placed an IR filter right in front of the sensor.Is it actually fun or an annoying bunch of post-processing work?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
>>3680776It's not a coat. You can even put it back if you like.
Isn't the point to make it black and white, purely for landscape photos?
>>3680832>not removing the bayer filter as well
>>3680845I guess. But you can also archieve interesting results experimenting with the white balance
>>3680850He's not an octopus.
Vol. X, 2nd Wave Editionsup /p/, just got a lot of shots processed from my quarantine backlog, take a look.as always, critique welcome, hope you enjoy the thread.
>>3680813I don't think OPs pictures are just pure architecture photos but maybe I'm too used to the geometry fetishists that usually do architecture photos.
I like the series. The different colored buildings holds it all together and the plants was a good twist. If I tried this around here, all the buildings would look too similar to each other.
>>3680815It's color play, geometry, and texture, all using the same subject and showing variety of that subject. The 1:1 really works out here as well.
>>3680828I don't know if you are OP or someone just responding. But I agree. It's color, textures and geometry but I still think, that, for example if it's to be in a book it generally has consistency except for a few things. Like I mentioned some of them like the bike just completely throw out the usual "straight on" perspective that ALL the other photos do, very jarring. And then that some of them have a lot of colour play and then suddenly 0 colours. Finally I still think even if it's "just" geometry, colours and architecture it still should and *does* invoke *A* feeling, it's just *I* don't personally feel anything (because it's not my kind of subject matter) and I don't know really know what OP wants me to feel.
>>3680839I'm not OP. The motorcycle was probably not meant to be in the series but just a side picture.
All discussion and questions related to gear should take place in this exact thread.Redirection and answering questions in this thread is encouraged.And don't forget, be polite!Previous: >>3674491
>>3681986>47mp sensor>micro 4/3We are going to learn sooner or latter what happens to Olympus and Panasonic "sharp" lenses above 20mp. I can't wait the shitstorm.
Ok can someone make a new gear thread?
>>3682941No you
anyone store their stuff in pelican cases? I bought a cheap Apache for storage. Curious to hear if anyone has any tips or words of warning
>>3683130>>3683130>>3683130>>3683130
Hey!Thoguht you guys could help me with something. I am about to get another lens for this summer, for a trip in the mountains with focus on wildlife. So I want a Tele lens/Zoom lens and found two options for my Sony A7III:- Sony FE 100-400 f/4,5-5,6 GM OSS- Sony FE 200-600 f/6,6-6,3 G OSSWhat do you guys prefer? Which one should I get? Do you have any recommendations?
>>3680457Yes you can adapt it with the MC-11 but either of the Sony tele zooms will be far superior.
>>3680477Sure, I'm just thinking about weight.Just looked it up and if it's accurate, the 200-600 is only 200g heavier than the Sigma. So that's not an issue.
>>3680487I did forget about Sigma's new 100-400 for under a grand. That'd be a serious option to consider at this point. Not compatible with TCs though.
>>3680457Yeah but that lens is fucking rubbish.>>3680233The Sony 200-600mm is very sharp at the long end and is cheaper than the 100-400mm, but obviously a bit heavier and larger and longer wide end.200-600 obvious choice for tele100-400 for a more flexible travel lens that can do tele.Unless you look at the new Sigma 100-400mm, since that is excellent value
>>3680557I'd consider TCs a non-factor honestly.Unless you're sticking them on some very nice prime glass you're dropping the quality considerably
ive recently got into photography and ive been obsessed with this girls work (pic) i want to know what type of camera does she use also what type of film.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution216 dpiVertical Resolution216 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1242Image Height1543
>>3680433This. Been trying to achieve this look for ages but it's just not working.
>>3680205It looks like 35mm 400iso something or other.>>3680441Agreed, definitely not MF. Could be Portra
>>3680441>square crop>1242x1543>????That's a big fat 5:4 ratio there fella Anyway, shoot print film and underexpose it by like 1/3-2/3 stop. milky shadows while still maintaining delicate color elsewhere. i remember when this look was the mark of an amateur who fucked up their processing or their shooting. now i guess it's "different" enough to be all the rage. oh well.
>>3680489oh true. either way im calling heavily cropped 35mm.
anyone wanna take a guess?
Has anyone ever done forced perspective photography before? Do you need a special kind of lens to get it right?
>>3678872Why don't you just Google it
>>3678844It does not look like it is. I think you're quite out of your depth here.
>>3677870There's a japanese guy who builds a bunch of detailed dioramas that he does forced perspective photography with.
>>3677870>Has anyone ever done forced perspective photography before?I dont think so. Sounds like a very new and unique idea :^)
>>3677870Why Is Colombia si beautiful brehs?
I'm about to start doing photography again anons. I've always been an amateur and I will continue to be an amateur any pointers?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D7500Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom CC 2.2.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern810Focal Length (35mm Equiv)202 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2019:05:05 12:49:25Exposure Time1/50 secF-Numberf/4.8Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/4.8Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length135.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
A lot of beginner stuff ignores foreground/background relationships and light/dark contrast. Generally I would say take fewer pics, but put more care and consideration into each one.
>>3680453Thanks for the pointers bro. I'll admit I did just walk past a dead bird and take a quick picture. I'll try and think more about my composition
>>3680384You wanna speak to the manager of photography?You're acting like a Karen right now
amateur [am-uh-choor, -cher, -ter, am-uh-tur] noun1. a person who engages in a study, sport, or other activity for pleasure rather than for financial benefit or professional reasons.2. an athlete who has never competed for payment or for a monetary prize.3. a person inexperienced or unskilled in a particular activity: Hunting lions is not for amateurs.4. a person who admires something; devotee; fan: an amateur of the cinema.
>>3680466Why are you straying from your original path. Obviously you replied that to flame me, but now you're defining words all of a sudden
