>>3599782

I have shot 60 year old Nikon lenses that were better than this.

>>3604296
Yeah but manual cars drive more or less the same as auto ones if you aren't completely inept. If manual cars took three times longer to accelerate to the same speed regardless of your gear shifting skills, nobody would've driven them.

>>3599782
>>3599783
>>3599789
Bad
>>3599784
Good, but should be cropped

wienerle

File: F2.jpg (273 KB, 1400x1050)

273 KB JPG

>>3604177
someone never learned how to use these

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon PowerShot G7
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS3 Macintosh
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	100 dpi
Vertical Resolution	100 dpi
Image Created	2011:09:27 19:29:00
Exposure Time	1/30 sec
F-Number	f/3.5
Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Exposure Bias	1.3 EV
Subject Distance	0.32 m
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	18.89 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1400
Image Height	1050
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

nice video OP.
was interested in this camera when i found out about it a few years ago. seems like it would be fun to play with, but ultimately not a good fit for my style of photography.

>>3602433

Is this how giannis faggot looks when pissed? Looks just like a few of our toxic anons.
Coincidence?

>>3603351
>implying you can't just type giannis into the name field
wew

>>3603356
Who would want to impersonate a gay pedo?

>>3602433
Idk man, that guy might be right. I haven't seen you post anything that wasn't just a piggy back off someone else's posts. Or some highschool level of "To add to this..." which is still a piggyback

>>3602885
>>3602886
literally just flash shot on film

>>3602885
maybe you could use something to diffuse the flash more, like a piece of plastic or whatever. You can also get external flashes.

>>3603566
he tries to emulate that as far as im aware

>>3602885
this has a much bigger flash on it, maybe the popup on a bigger camera or even a hotshoe flash point directly ahead.

File: Naamloos.png (24 KB, 800x600)

24 KB PNG

>>3603844
>rangefinder glass
Enjoy your field curvature

>>3603989
I didn't know they did this. that's pretty cool i guess

>>3603989
This is why some lenses look like ass on MTF charts but are stunning to use in person.

You know exactly what brands I'm talking about.

>>3604000
Stop making excuses for your blurry photos

>>3603989
Reviewers who test RF lenses and give them a "rating" based on how they perform on random sensors with varying filter stack thicknesses and microlens arrays, should be lined up and shot.

>>3604189
First of all what's "the" Bauhaus? Aren't there 3 or something?
Also what you're seeing is not the film being "frozen", unless you were at -30ºC. Cold doesn't have any adverse effects on the film (and image) characteristics apart from making the film a bit more brittle. (Or prone to condensation if you move between warm-freezing quickly).

The vignette comes from your lens. Either because you shot close to wide open, or because you used a hood too long for your lens and is obstructing the corners.
The blown white parts come from your shutter (most likely) or aperture (less likely), becoming sluggish in cold weather because their lubricants freeze.
Or maybe it's massive lightleaks, did you open the film back accidentally? Are you sure you loaded the film onto the dev reels in complete darkness?

>I was wondering if you guys think it's any good
Judging from the pic you posted, it looks like shit. What effect is good? Vignette? If you purposely use it to isolate a subject, it can be "good". Or if you have a strong subject anyway, it can be tolerated. But the blown part? There isn't a photo there anymore to critique.

>how much I should cool down the film
Doesn't matter, film will adjust to ambient temperature within minutes.
>to get that effect and also what films are prone to this.
You won't get that effect and no films are prone to it.

>>3603635
if you find an speedbooster at least get a phone that can do raw and full manual, also be prepared for some disapointment as you are gona photograph throug a lens then an speedbooster and then the crappy lens of the phone onto a tiny sensor. a phone is never gona reach the iq of larger format camera systems that is physically imposible!

File: 61vZNv6JLvL._AC_SY355_.jpg (15 KB, 351x355)

15 KB JPG

On the topic: Did anyone ever try out this camera mod for the MotoZ?

>>3603722
lol i remember seeing the commercials for those motomod things and just knowing instantly how hard they were gonna flop

>>3603769
Yeah, right? There was this one that was basically just a a big ol' JBL speaker. I could have imagined that go be quite popular but.... It wasn't.

>>3603970
it flies in the face of the direction that the industry has been going. people who buy the latest flagship phones want it to be an all in one device, nobody wants to carry around a bunch of shit you have to snap on to make your phone perform various tasks competently

Talent level 2/10, keep shooting to level up.

>>3603902
This was mostly a project/concept. This is unhelpful criticism.

>>3603937
Have some self criticism and don't upload failed shots then. If there's anything that I don't like it's shovelling shit to get to few gems in there. Waste of time and effort, so I don't bother.
Remember that, it'll come handy when you'll find someone to dump your portfolio on.

>>3603944
You have completely missed the point.

Start curating ya shit mate.

File: Dip Again.jpg (1.24 MB, 2688x938)

1.24 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D5100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	870
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	18 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1500
Image Height	1000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	100 dpi
Vertical Resolution	100 dpi
Image Created	2020:01:20 22:44:41
Exposure Time	1/25 sec
F-Number	f/4.5
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Lens Aperture	f/4.5
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	12.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2688
Image Height	938
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	High Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3603882
1+1+1=?

>>3603921
I have seen this staircase so many times.

>>3603967
Cool. Me too but I like it. Ya got a double shot to input?

I wish the fucking sensor would just keep the shutter closed when you took the god damn lens off

>>3603706
yeah i wish their was an internal cap or something

>>3603706
I think Canon does that on the EOS R. It's probably a beancounter which normally prevents such a feature from making it in to a production camera.

File: 6C6B019E-1134-42D5-AA20-5(...).jpg (3.75 MB, 4032x3024)

3.75 MB JPG

HOW THE FUCK DID THIS DUST GET HERE

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Right-Hand, Top
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4032
Image Height	3024
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3603745
What did you expect? Cleaning your gear is part of being a photographer. Unless you're one of those slobs who completely fucks up your gear and can't sell it on because it looks disgusting. Most used Sony gear looks like that on ebay to be fair, the people buying the cameras tend to be newfags.

Learn to clean your lenses, sensor and camera body properly and it'll become routine. You should be cleaning your stuff up before you plan any major shoot imo. Just some brushing and wiping is enough to keep things decent for a few weeks depending on how active you are.

Cara are safest in garages, but that's not what cars are for.

Cameras are safest at home, but that's not what cameras are for.

>>3602192
Is that the question? I thought OP was wondering if it's worthwhile

This is what compacts are for
Rx100, gr series, g7/9 etc

File: Screenshot_20200120-193824.png (1.31 MB, 1080x1920)

1.31 MB PNG

I ditched the banana for a square shaped little man bag but basically this is what I take.

>>3598943
>no raw support
Just download Camera FV-5 from internet for free.

>>3601966
>>3601967
>>3601968
>>3601969
>>3601971
>>3601972

Are you trolling? what the fucking autistic is this shit?

Camera's fine, you're shit.

>>3602511
>>3602546
Thanks for the suggestions, will look them up!

>>3602636
>>3602959
Thanks for the feedback, I will try to improve

why even post?

>>3601966
This is a keeper imo. Blur your eyes a bit and the play on form is decent.

>>3601967
>>3601968
Dont work for me.

>>3601969
Decent. Can dig the staircase, shadow effect - there's a certain rhythm going on here.

>>3601971
Don't like it.

>>3601972
I get it, but it's not intriguing. Maybe as a set it would work but even then you are pushing the nature of the beast.

>>3601741

Virgin Killer remains undefeated

friendly reminder to everyone that album covers will never, ever be considered art

>>3603614
wow, what fucking stupid take

File: 20200120_141334.jpg (457 KB, 1070x1070)

457 KB JPG

>>3601741
my favorite cover is this one

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Unknown

>>3603196
Agree mr FBI agent

>>3603855
Yeah it's perfectly fine for a beginner. If you really get into photography you'll see the cameras limits and know what to look for in a camera if you upgrade. And if you dont like it it's not suuuper expensive sonyoure not out a huge amount.

>>3603855
Get any DSLR you can afford and get any lens.

Don't worry too much at the beginning.

The important thing is studying the concepts within photography.

Look into the exposure triangle, how ISO, Shutter Speed and Aperture affect your image and the basics of composition.

as anon above said, once you are at a point where you understand those things, you'll be in a place where you'll understand what you need from a camera and the differences it can make.

Most of all, have fun with it.

yes. Don't get sucked into gear faggotry and start shooting, spare us or any audience for that matter your first 1000 pics or so

Aren't Sony, Fuji, and Toshiba all in the same keiretsu? None of them thought to spin a new company name off for this one?

Your skin will curl when dried.