Wtf is “medium format look”? It is just low depth of field at a wider angle? Surely you could get the same DoF on FF with a f1 lens? Is it just a myth?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX100VCamera SoftwareDigital Camera X100V Ver2.12Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2022:09:09 17:27:59Exposure Time1/45 secF-Numberf/2.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating3200Lens Aperturef/2.0Brightness-2.4 EVExposure Bias0.7 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length23.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1280Image Height853RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4254833Medium Format look was something from the perspective of APSC userz before the newest lenses etc.
>>4254833Crop (such as,"full" frame) sensors suffer from noticeable problems. For example, more noise at the same ISO, less flexibility with dof (outside of some exotic, often very soft lenses), and diffraction at relatively low f numbers. When printed large the differences are apparent and in my opinion this makes 35mm unsuitable for prints.
>>4255044meme fool turds pissbaby detected
>>4255046LOL
>>4254833>It is just low depth of field at a wider angle?Yes. Get a Sigma 20mm f/1.4
By doing it just like all things awkward.
>>4255008>>4255010/ThreadIt really is this simple
Just focus on your craft. Do it once and it'll forever be easy
I have done this and literally have social anxiety. Quite simply stop being a bitch.
>>4254999if you had no fear you'd have steady hands. you're double fucked lol
Hello sirs, I am making a documentary featuring low light forest shots. Is there any recommendation as to what choice of camera to buy?I am making a documentary about Djinn and many of the photography will be at night.thank you sirs from Pakisatn <3
>>4254116which one should i get? lens+body under 2k?
>>4254396You can get the older S5 for cheap, maybe $1200. A canon fd 50mm f1.4 and an adapter will cos around $100, then spend the rest on lights and sound.
>>4254398>Panasonic S5iithank you my sir
>>4254402No the old S5, without phase detect. You can still get them new for cheap, and depending on what You're shooting you probably don't want to use autofocus.
>>4254483so the older one is better? im confused
Trying XPAN Again EditionPrevious thread: >>4243017
>>4246533Gorgeous colors. Would print and frame/10>>4246983Photogenic old guard. >>4247158Looks like something I'd see on a billboard ad. Gucci and Adidas brands being slightly covered adds something fun to it not being an ad at all.
>>4247977Rallies and revolution-esque gatherings always provide the best portraits. >>4248256The best part about your street photography is that there's only one main artificial light source.
>>4246862Have you edited this at all ? Looks like it could be a beautiful shot all around if you pulled more out of the shadows in the foreground.
>>4253369I still got the raw. I’ll go back into it and give it a go.
>>4247071I like her nails, pretty
It's over
>>4254952Oh come on, where is your blog post reply? I feel let down. Was your computer too busy running AI NR software on your 4x more noisy mft RAWs for you to write a blog post?
>>4251055>See cool car >Gonna take a pic>prrrrrrrrrr>Let's go through 120 pictures so I can find one that looks like the other 110 so I can start editing>at 24mp
>>4252004>Sony Northrup
>>4252312local news site had an article about ED and they used sad Tony stock photo for it lmao
>>4253193gotta keep it tight innit
What do you use for organizing your photo collection?Is it a bad idea to use built-in Photos app in Mac? I tried Digikam but it felt a little too sluggish.
>>4254815I have my RAWs on my NAS and keep them in Capture One. The images I like I export to JPG and put them into Apple Photos so I can share them to my family (mostly photos of my kid). The ones I upload to 4chink I export to an EXIF stripped folder (fsevent script that auto strips exif of any image that gets put ino the folder).[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON Z 6_2Camera SoftwareCapture One 23 MacintoshSensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)85 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiExposure Time1/640 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length85.00 mmImage Width1363Image Height2048RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4254815>for organizing your photo collectionpicrelated
Just felt like posting. I like shooting but I hate editing, which I know is half the process. Can't get better without doing, so I'm trying to do it more.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS CORPORATIONCamera ModelE-M1MarkIIICamera SoftwareDxO PhotoLab 5.15.1Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Color Filter Array Pattern29146Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2023:10:25 18:01:13Exposure Time1/400 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias0 EVSubject Distance35.62 mMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length40.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1000Image Height787RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessSoft
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS CORPORATIONCamera ModelE-M1MarkIIICamera SoftwareDxO PhotoLab 5.16Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Color Filter Array Pattern26876Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2023:11:18 17:01:28Exposure Time1/500 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias0 EVSubject Distance128.00 mMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length40.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3888Image Height5184RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessSoft
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS CORPORATIONCamera ModelE-M1MarkIIICamera SoftwareDxO PhotoLab 5.16Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Color Filter Array Pattern27902Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2023:11:18 17:01:32Exposure Time1/180 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias-1/2 EVSubject Distance12.11 mMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length40.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width5184Image Height3888RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessSoft
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS CORPORATIONCamera ModelE-M1MarkIIICamera SoftwareDxO PhotoLab 5.16Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Color Filter Array Pattern28586Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2023:11:18 17:01:35Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias0 EVSubject Distance7.86 mMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length40.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3888Image Height5184RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessSoft
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS CORPORATIONCamera ModelE-M1MarkIIICamera SoftwareDxO PhotoLab 5.16Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Color Filter Array Pattern26816Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2023:11:18 17:01:38Exposure Time1/350 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias0 EVSubject Distance8.46 mMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length40.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3888Image Height5184RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessSoft
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS CORPORATIONCamera ModelE-M1MarkIIICamera SoftwareDxO PhotoLab 5.16Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Color Filter Array Pattern27248Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2023:11:18 17:01:41Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias0 EVSubject Distance273.07 mMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length40.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3888Image Height5184RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessSoft
>pixel peep photo on camera screen>it's in focus>load onto computer>focus is wrong
>look at self in mirror>look great>try to take photo of self>look terribleEvery fucking time. And shit yes I have used everything from 35mm-200mm.
>>4254768you are correcting your pose when you look in the mirroryou need to learn how to poseunfortunately this means you are ugly in real life
>>4254768try putting lens cap on head
>>4254775>unfortunately this means you are ugly in real lifeI'm not so sure, photos on my phone turn out pretty good and just random/non-posed glances in the mirror look perfectly fine.
>>4254775or its because he's used to seeing himself mirrored. seeing yourself on camera without being mirrored is just jarring to people, it's a well known thing.
Since this is a photography board I’ll post photos of my last trip. Some have been posted on /rpt/ already.Most anons will think my photos are shit, but this is the only place where I share my “work”. All photos are shot on a Ricoh kr-5 and a Canon EF.Thanks for feedback or any type of analysis.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1280Image Height862Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4253850trip fags are just attention whoring on a slow board so I wouldn't take anything they say seriously
>>4254122This is the post I was waiting for. Thank you for your valuable insights! It was my first time playing with a sheet and I will definitely try other ways to make it work.You are right, I need a subject to really be able to see a photo I would like to take.Film fuck up was a lucky mistake The last series with the naked woman was taken at 10am after a drug fuelled night out, I see your point and will keep it in mind for my next sessions.Am going on a month long trip to Brazil next and will try and get some good stuff. Again, very valuable feedback! Thank you
>>4254144You're welcome, I'm happy to support quality photo threads on /p.
>>4253856The only person here of note is Alex, and you know it's him straight away from his photos and exif, no need for a trip.I only came back here recently after a couple of years away from /p/, posted a thread and now I'll probably nope out for another couple. Nothing much interesting happening around here, mostly crap gear threads. Tripfag threads and trips in general used to have interesting photos or things to say; most of the time they seem particularly insufferable now. >>4253752Good one in the series.>>4253771>>4253795Keepers, the other two photos have nothing worth of note but "nakked lady".As for the other photos, they don't seem to be anything special imo, a bit forgettable.
Really cool photos anon, keep it up
ok, what is the catch[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 80DMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.7Image-Specific Properties:Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/11.0ISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/11.3Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo FlashFocal Length100.00 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManual
>>4254613I didn't find any article in English that would explain what happened, but if I remember well, they did a bit of tax fraud?
>>4254618not him but depending on the kind of coat, a 1 pound camera can really weigh it down and make it awkward to walk around with, especially if you walk fast. im a 5'9 manlet tho
>>4254618You must live in fucking norway with a heavy coat zipped up at all timesMore likely you’re an american and used to carrying a 2lb gun so you don’t notice
>>4254622>articlegramps, there are several videos on yt documenting olympus's corporate accounting fraud. Just search for olympus fraud.
>>4254613It’s why the camera side got sold off while the medical imaging biz survived, but >>4254457Is sort of right. It’s not about the size, it’s that Olympus missed the boat on subject recognition AF and gimped their entry and mid-market cameras. Now that Canikony have caught up, you’ve got lenses like the Canon 200-600 that threaten to gut the entire rationale for buying Olympus.
Hi anons, I can get the panasonic s5ii together with the kit lens for 1650 eurobucks at my local camera store. I know that this is a good deal compared to other stores online, but is the camera actually that good?I'm mainly shooting portraits and architecture and have used a canon dlsr up until now, but also want to start doing some video stuff, so I'd go for a hybrid like the s5ii. Are there any better options at this price point, or is my local store just insane with the pricing and this is the deal of a lifetime?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width699Image Height700Scene Capture TypeStandard
this is the worst camera in the world even worse than a brownie box camera
>>4250768It's just an a7iii with 10bit video
>>4250768>>4250770kys
>>4250768But it's not a Sony.
>>4254576It’s a panasonic which is really the same thing https://www.google.com/search?q=gh5+shutter+ibis+failure
I got an used A7iii only to find out that it fucking crops the video at 4k resolution. Luckly I was able to return the camera.I bought a fucking Full Frame camera, fuck this crop faggotry!Then I read that Nikon Z shit also does crop at 4k.At this rate, I guess it is better to spend less money and get an APSC camera for video.I can't find this information anywhere what camera does crop or not when recording video. I can't believe no one did a list with all this information.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution144 dpiVertical Resolution144 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2240Image Height1154
>>4254506My Z5 does this too, are you saying your cameras will rather clip the highlights?
>>4254559Raw is the prime codec. Internal raw up to 120fps would be a game changer on a consoomer camera. Otherwise it doesn’t really matter.
>>4254503Yeah the gr has always had a shit sensor, shit UI, shit autofocus, shit matrix metering, etc. any ricoh/pentax camera is guaranteed to be an overpriced scam that only really works well in manual mode. Fuji panasonic nikon. Stick with em. >>4254560Turn it off highlight or center weighted metering.
>>4254534given how efficient modern compression systems are the difference is negligible for anything short of silver screen delivery and/or VERY heavy handed grading
>>4254550So these blurry youtube shorts are what 4k 120 was needed for? No wonder he never noticed the quality was the same as fhd. There’s even heat shimmer in basically all of them. Could use a camera shootout 720p for that.
Previous >>4250807
>>4254549Cool it with the anti-Indian remarks.
>>4254537om1 has a stacked sensor, hence shit color rendition and noise performance due to heat.
>>4254556>stacked sensors are worseand other ancient new delhi wisdom from the local shill
>>4254554GOOD MORNING SAR
roll for more tears >>4254655
why don't you have a cute doll to take photographs of
>>4253073i want to post more dollfoto
>>4253075then i guess it's time to get yourself a doll
>>4253081i already have 12 but I'm up for another. at least half of them are posted in this thread
>>4253073>there's no point in spamming another doll thread on /p/I will do it again in a couple of days
>>4193925nice! cute!
OH NO NO NO NO NO! So this is the power of Sony Color Science?! This is a Sony A9iii sample image. Hahahahahahahahaha. "hurr durr global shutter hurr durr." Hahahahahahahahahaha.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-9M3Camera SoftwareILCE-9M3 v0.80Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)135 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2023:11:07 16:24:52Exposure Time1/16000 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating4000Brightness3.5 EVExposure Bias-0.3 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashFlash, Compulsory, Return DetectedFocal Length135.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width6000Image Height4000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4253417Strong is better because otherwise the other photosites get more excited than they should. There's an equilibrium to be reached, it's not a hard cutoff like you say but separation is required. A hard cutoff is bad because you risk not exciting some photosites enough with midtones.
>>4252401they look 26+. why would you want them
>>4252557ENHANCE[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>4252401i hope it seems this bro
>>4252556>You've probably fapped to worse in a /soc/ threadSounds like some serious projection going on here.