This is a photograph of "FountainSculpture by Marcel Duchamps" not The FountainSculpture by Marcel Duchamps.
>>3801005Original 'Fountain' is lost. Photo still exists.
>>3801459Photograph is more real than the "Fountain".
https://vimeo.com/44601540
>>3801177I want to see your photographs.
Who are some of the best photographers of all time?Hard mode: No Ansel Adams
>>3799642>literal cia psyopWhy do normalfags keep falling for them?
>>3799486I'm not too impressed by Meisel but Newton is top notch. >>3799549Kek
>>3799642>There will never be a more powerful image than the falling man from 9/11. No other image could make as many people emotional.nobody cares about americans,especially after all the lives they took in the middle eastthey got it coming
>>3795982>dude, garish HDR look before flickr
>>3801538>dude [insert some meaningless cliche] look before flickr Bonus Points:>you can use this "argument" for every artist
>digital command dials>AF-On button for back button focusing>AF joystick for arcade-like AF point positioning fun>a grip that actually fits in your hand, fills your hand and feels good in your hand>shutter positioned right at your fingertip, no need to contort your finger like with the X-T4>IBIS.....>.......and it has an X-trans sensorDamn, fuji. So close, yet so far away. When will they produce a decent camera with a decent sensor?
>>3801436You mean the X-A3?
>>3801438the sort of person who browses /p/ and is interested in more than snap-shittery isn't the target audience of the x-a3.
>>3801445>person who browses /p/>interested in more than snap-shitteryWhat a bizarre, self-contradicting, fictional character you have created.
>>3801436>if you've fallen for the fear uncertainty and doubt sown by trolls hereHi shill. Fuji X-tranny looks like trash, specially when there's vegetation in the shot.
>>3801408If you ask me, both grips suck.But I also think the grip on the 5D models sucks, so maybe take my opinion with a grain of salt.Nikon D5300 is perfection.
What kind of flash does /p/ use on her camera? I want something that can keep up with my EOS M6 Mark II's 14 fps bursts for when I am photographing my cat. How can I buy one that does this?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image Width600Image Height310
>>3801104It's called the i should have just coughed up the extra 200 dollars and bought some actual strobes battery pack D:But then again being able to fit an entire lighting set up in my backpack is pretty neat :D
Anyone use vintage flashes?
>>3799144>What kind of flash does /p/ use on her camera?Godox V1
>>3801110>honeydon't call me honey, faggot
>>3801305Don't call me faggot, hon.
Say something nice about her.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiColor Space InformationsRGB
>>3797031Redpill me on this Pentax color magic
>>3796975When they added the GPS in the Mark II, they removed the flash. Why didn't they add a flash back in??
>>3800133There's no place on that camera for a flash that would be useful
>>3800133Because they replaced it with superior pentaprism.
>>3787330This has got to be the ugliest silver camera I've ever seen.
BREAKING: Fujifilm GFX100S, GF80mmF1.7, X-E4, XF27mmF2.8II, XF70-300mmF4-5.6, New Film Simulation Coming JANUARY 27
>>3799798>burst speed>buffer size>AFNone of these really affect me at all in my shooting, the only thing I care about is the lens selection (as in do they have lenses I want, not if they have X amount of lenses so I can say they have a lot of them) and battery life.
>>3799841>>3799842200MB for a single photo! my hard drive can't take it bruh
>>3799798>Sony MF is an absolute no.showFixed it for ya, troll.
>>3799921stop being poor!
>>3799878Why does lens selection matter if you are not shooting any moving subjects? If your subject is still, then you can just walk right up to it with your 28mm prime and zoom with your feet.
As a relative noob, how wrong am I to just subscribe to the idea of "f/8 and be there"?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width600Image Height746Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>3800905>direct sunlight>f/22>1/40>blur from camera shake holding 200mm lensop is /p/ material i like him
>>3800908This statement isn't about lens sharpness
>>3800908You have zero idea what OP is talking about.
i always equate f/8 as FATE.... or 'Be in the Right Place at the Right Time'>i'd rather be lucky than smart>i'm not very lucky>my camera is smart enough for us both
>>3799601Jesus, okay, "f/8 and be there" is a hell of a lot better than "f/22 at ISO 100 and be there", at least.A small aperture (i.e., large f/stop like f/22) means not a lot of light is getting into your lens. To compensate for the lack of light from your lens, the camera needs to lower the shutter speed to expose your sensor for longer, or increase the sensitivity of your sensor. The fact that your ISO is at 100 even though your shutter is all the way down at 1/40th suggests that you've got it set manually instead of using auto-ISO to let it float. Modern cameras are pretty good even at high ISOs, so I'd recommend letting it do auto-ISO. Then, open your aperture the hell up. f/8 would actually be a really good place to go with that lens--its maximum is f/5.6 at the long end, and you'll usually get a bit better quality stopped down a little, so f/8 is good. f/22 is something that you should almost never be using; that's probably about as small as your aperture gets, unless it'll also do f/32. So, >>3800910 has some okay advice. Maybe also try auto ISO and aperture priority but with a much wider aperture like f/8 or f/5.6--in bright sunlight, that should still give you a fast enough shutter speed to catch a plane, but going with shutter-priority like he suggested will guarantee it and requires you to know less.
Post your oldest photos[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareMicrosoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2016:06:12 11:42:31
>>3801287They're really not that bad!1/3[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2021:01:19 16:52:02Exposure Time1/70 secF-Numberf/4.6Lens Aperturef/4.6Exposure Bias0 EVFocal Length4.90 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1500Image Height1125RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain Down
>>38013162/3[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2021:01:19 16:52:25Exposure Time1/30 secF-Numberf/3.0Lens Aperturef/3.0Exposure Bias0.3 EVFocal Length4.90 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1500Image Height1125RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain Down
>>38013183/3[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2021:01:19 16:52:44Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/5.1Lens Aperturef/5.1Exposure Bias0 EVFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1500Image Height1125RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain Up
wish I could, my back ups corrupted and I lost original.wish I could share it with you pee babies, it was the last photo I took with my grandparents. 2021 hurts already
why are filters so expensive
>>3801154it's not really
>>3800947>why are filters so expensiveBecause gear fags buy them by the bucketload
>>3800947Buy chink shit instead of BRAND-NAME gear.
>>3800947>why is slave labour cheaper than non-slave labouroh I don't know
>>3801282are you saying cheap filters use slave labor and expensive ones do not?
discuss c mount lenses[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot A590 ISMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.6Image-Specific Properties:Exposure Time1/15 secF-Numberf/2.6ISO Speed Rating640Lens Aperturef/2.6Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo FlashFocal Length5.80 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAuto
>>3800976They won't completely cover an APS-C sensor (which needs around a 28mm image circle) without vignetting. The amount of vingette will vary though because C mount only specifies the thread size (1" 32tpi) and film/sensor registration distance (0.69" (nice)), not an image circle. Because for about 100 years, C-Mount lenses have been made for everything from 8mm and 16mm movie film to 1/4", 1/3", 1/2", 2/3" and 1" video tubes, and then later CCD and CMOS sensors up to 4/3" type in security cameras and machine vision applications.Their image circles will range from 5mm to 22mm, with the 22mm being the modern industrial kind.Just do a little research (read the specs on the manufacturers website, or find PDF scans on film forums) about the lens you want to try and that will tell you if it will cover the format you want to shoot.
>>3801069I'm assuming it would work well on a camera that does 16mm or Super 8 emulation?
>>3801069Damn thats good info, thank you!
>>3801069>They won't completely cover an APS-C sensor (which needs around a 28mm image circle) without vignettingSome will, some won't. It depends on the lens.>(0.69" (nice))Nice.
>>3801191It's true that some C-mount lenses have an image circle larger than the intended film, maybe even enough to illuminate an APS-C sensor without vignetting, but keep in mind the projection outside of the designed image size falls off in optical quality. Your mileage may vary, as there are lots of old lenses out there to try, but that's the fun of it.
Let’s see your kit[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1280Image Height958
>>3801937what sort of shit?
>>3802705Spelling "defense" as "defence"
>>3802751That's the British way of spelling it you dolt.
>>3802754Pretending to be british is pretty cringe bro
>>3802758Working in defence here is pretty cringe. Full of all sorts of old Navy men who insist of saying they work for "Her Majesty's Ryal Navy" and call you out if you don't call them by their titles.
Yeay?Nay?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image Created2020:10:29 14:56:13
>>3801178Depends on what you want to use it for...But if I got into videography, I'd probably get one, in part because of MFT lens compatibility, in part because it's pretty compact, in part because an attachment gives you 2 XLR inputs and in part, because it's just a neat piece of equipment.The only thing I could fault it for is a lack of screen for seeing what you're doing, and even seeing the menus. But I guess if it used the ethernet port, that'd be mostly irrelevant.
>>3801178It depends on it's rolling shutter performance. Good enough to rival latest canon sensors, and it can be a very good vid cam indeed.
>>3801272>It depends on it's rolling shutter performance. Good enough to rival latest canon sensors, and it can be a very good vid cam indeed.It's on Netflix's list of approved cameras.
>>3801178It's a fairly capable camera if you know how to use it. This person clearly does not. The eyecup and reddit cuck kitchen knife hanging off the side is useless because the BGH1 doesn't have IBIS and shouldn't be shouldered. You want to set it on a tripod, which you can just grab anywhere to move, or put it on a gimble, jib, or drone. The red mic holder and oversized arm clamps are a distraction is this is meant to be used as a "documentary" camera. The monitor isn't even plugged in because I am assuming this "setup" was slapped together by some loser on youtube hoping to get likes and subscribes.
>>3801344I always wandered how does shock feel when one realizes he is completely wrong. Care to explain?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFyYgcAF-iM
What kind of music do you anons like to listen to while editing photos? I usually put on some Joe Hisaishi or some jazz to help make editing a more relaxing process, but I'd like to hear what you all listen to.Pic semi related, took this when I went and saw Knocked Loose at the Nile Theater.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOnePlusCamera ModelGM1917Camera SoftwareLightroomImage-Specific Properties:Image Created2019:10:15 22:39:50Exposure Time1/30 secF-Numberf/1.7ISO Speed Rating5678Lens Aperturef/1.7FlashNo FlashFocal Length4.76 mm
>>3798555>editing photos
>>3798631Yes. Editing photos. If you dont edit your photos you are more than likely a shitty photographer.
vengaboys
>>3798631>he fell for the sooc meme
>>3798555fuck man that sounds like an awesome show, i really fuckin dig knocked loose if i'm editing a band's photos i usually put their stuff on
Hows this edit looking /p/. Feels like its not reached its potential, and a bit too overcooked but I'm having trouble finding the balance. It was shot on porta 400 on my leaky FM2.
>>3800738how
>>3801205Thanks>>3801209Grey point eye dropper auto curve don’t flatter yourself >>3801222ngmi
>>3800051Why did you clone out the man but not his shadow?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1217Image Height900Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>3800051Only skimmed the bickering in this thread but made my own quick and dirty edit.Here's my take on the photo- the shadows should be dark instead of colourful- the colour on the floor (blue shadow, red foreground) should be emphasized[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera Softwaredarktable 3.5.0+150~ge5b8e9023-dirtyImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2021:01:20 01:28:55Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width591Image Height756
Thanks for the replies, I've taken it all on board.Just to clarify, I didn't think it was a great photo with a great subject, just a challenging one to edit that had me stuck.I hated the sky too, but I thought the oversaturation was better than the added redness from the light leak.
Thread got archived before results were posted.
Results and winner of [Photo Challenge 3]:https://strawpoll.online/Results/3651First place: >>>3792418Tie for second place with one vote: >>>everyone else[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-T3Camera SoftwareCapture One Pro 12.0.4 WindowsPhotographerDP2019Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)17 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiExposure Time1/13 secF-Numberf/1.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating640Lens Aperturef/1.0Brightness-5.5 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length11.00 mmImage Width1248Image Height832RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessHardSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>3801158>7 votesAnon I live in /r9k/ but damn that's sad
>>3801165I don't like Christmas.