[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
06/20/16New 4chan Banner Contest with a chance to win a 4chan Pass! See the contest page for details.
[Hide] [Show All]


[Catalog] [Archive]

File: 1469531210_1159252.jpg (386 KB, 2000x2000)
386 KB
386 KB JPG
I'm looking for a good secondary camera that I can carry around much easier than my DSLR. I've been looking around at compact cameras and I'd really like the Ricoh GR III, but I'm not ready to spend the premium for a camera that I'm not sure about. Does anyone have any thoughts on the GR II? Is it comparable to the GR III, and is it worth the price on the secondary market?
40 replies and 6 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: R0020263-Edit.jpg (2.97 MB, 2481x2481)
2.97 MB
2.97 MB JPG
I'm pulling the trigger on a Ricoh GR III this weekend. Got a good deal on it.

The Ricoh GR (2013) is my favourite camera of all time so I'm pretty excited.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera ModelGR
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.0 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2018:10:24 04:56:30
Exposure Time1/40 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/2.8
Brightness3.6 EV
Exposure Bias1 EV
Metering ModeSpot
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length18.30 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessHard
>>
>>3603184
Fuck off to /spg/!
>>
>>3605068
I cleaned mine last year, took me two tries to get all the dust off, but it wasn't very difficult. There's a good manual online and the risk of ruining the camera is low.
>>
>>3605111
>OP wants something small to carry around
>recommend OP bulky wrist breaking shit
Quality posting, anon. You may as well have recommended a view camera.
>>
File: Shield Lens.jpg (128 KB, 1024x576)
128 KB
128 KB JPG
>>3605194
>Mirrorless are lacking good pancake lenses.
Ain't that the truth.

>>3605229
Anon, said, "good."

File: R1-01740-0034.jpg (900 KB, 1818x1228)
900 KB
900 KB JPG
Hi! In this thread i want to post the photos that i like the most from my scans and to get some critique so i know how to improve. Any critique is accepted as long its not in the lines of: "dont like, shit photo".
>>
File: R1-01738-031A.jpg (776 KB, 1228x1818)
776 KB
776 KB JPG
>>3605794
2/5

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareMicrosoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2020:01:19 12:15:09
>>
File: R1-01817-0011.jpg (648 KB, 1228x1818)
648 KB
648 KB JPG
>>3605795
3/5

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareMicrosoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2020:01:19 12:16:18
>>
File: R1-01887-014A.jpg (982 KB, 1818x1228)
982 KB
982 KB JPG
>>3605796
4/5
>>
File: R1-01886-0008.jpg (1.39 MB, 1818x1228)
1.39 MB
1.39 MB JPG
>>3605798
5/5

File: 8347776-3x2-940x627.jpg (91 KB, 940x627)
91 KB
91 KB JPG
Which camera actually has the fastest auto-focus? I feel like every camera claims to have the fastest auto-focus
54 replies and 7 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3601455
>he only had about 6 seconds to take the shot
Most photogs can focus a view camera in 6 seconds, let alone an SLR or RF.
>>
>>3602393
It's just 1 thing less to think about. It's a beneficial convenience and you get more time for composition.
>>
>>3601191
A9 version 1 and 2
>>
>>3601210

Weird that there's an afro video posted praising Sony. Have they truly bought everyone out there?
>>
>>3601191
tesla

File: manattack.jpg (742 KB, 3133x2078)
742 KB
742 KB JPG
ITT: Candids that went very wrong.

In this photo I was using a telephoto to capture this wild beast in his natural habitat. He quickly chased me 3 city blocks while calling me a f@@gott and various threats of violence. I had to hide behind a fence. Second pic is him leaving after a half hour. I plan on going back every day to take his photo until he runs out of fucks enough to chase me.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2020:01:04 08:39:27
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3133
Image Height2078
50 replies and 8 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3602509
Sorry. I was in the bushes fapping.
>>
>>3602520
>>3602642
I will be back this Friday to look for him!
>>
>>3604824
Ok. Should i keep my dick out then, or what?
>>
>>3604824
bad ass man. i have faith that this time will be good.
>>
>>3604838
kek

File: Kaxinda-25mm-f0.95.jpg (56 KB, 800x800)
56 KB
56 KB JPG
Should I buy this chinkshit lens?
it's the fastest and widest thing I've found for my A6000.
I mostly shoot at night
30 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3604777
if the thead is still up I might post some old test shots or I'll take more tomorrow night. camera is in my other car
>>
File: DSC01788.jpg (4.7 MB, 6000x4000)
4.7 MB
4.7 MB JPG
>>3604782
>>3604777
hopefully it didnt kill the exif when I made it smol to post on 4channel
I'll admit i didnt try very hard to set the focus on this because it was bloody cold and 1 am.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-6000
Camera Softwarepaint.net 4.0.21
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)45 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution350 dpi
Vertical Resolution350 dpi
Image Created2020:01:24 01:46:29
Exposure Time30 sec
F-Numberf/3.5
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating400
Brightness-5.8 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length30.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width6000
Image Height4000
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastSoft
SaturationLow
SharpnessSoft
>>
>>3605695
just want to say I waited 2 fucking days for your pictures
>>
File: DSC01776.jpg (2.78 MB, 6000x4000)
2.78 MB
2.78 MB JPG
>>3605698
i'm sorry :( its hard to get motivation to do this stuff.

pic of my shitbox. effect looks way better on more shiny and not silver cars but I dont feel comfortable posting other people's cars here.
This is what I would mostly be doing at close range. The lens does it I guess but the background and foreground are meh, no bokeh, too dark in some spots.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-6000
Camera Softwarepaint.net 4.0.21
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)45 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution350 dpi
Vertical Resolution350 dpi
Image Created2020:01:24 00:52:55
Exposure Time30 sec
F-Numberf/3.5
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating400
Brightness-5.8 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length30.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width6000
Image Height4000
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastSoft
SaturationLow
SharpnessSoft
>>
>>3605702
That is quite the spoiler you got there mate.

File: Asia Tour 2019-20 -15.jpg (391 KB, 720x1080)
391 KB
391 KB JPG
Please feel free to discuss these ethical issues:
>Buying vs Pirating Photoshop/Lightroom
Taking Creepshots of people (earlier there was a thread that touched on this but quickly diverted into an argument with a tripfag
>Entire image manipulation to get more (you)s/likes
Shilling a brand that may be inferior for a specific purpose but you shill anyway

Recently my work got me a Macbook and I've been struggling to download/install a pirated copy of Lightroom on it and was wandering how many anons actually purchase the software? If you purchased the software do you make money off your photos? Does making money off your photos make you think it is right to continue pirating (if that is what you do).
I always thought while I'm not making money from photography it is "okay" to use pirated software but should I earn an income I'd purchase it.
The other questions I raise is just to add more depth, anyone is welcome to add a /p/ dilemma

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 80D
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 9.1 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.4
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2020:01:13 09:05:27
Exposure Time1/80 sec
F-Numberf/2.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating1000
Lens Aperturef/2.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
20 replies and 3 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: 2011-and-2003-winners.jpg (170 KB, 1000x667)
170 KB
170 KB JPG
Some of the Pulitzer prize winners for feature photography always struck me as a mixed bag, ethically. One one hand, you have powerful stories that should be shared. On the other, you often have a red carpet affair and a plaque on the wall that applauds someone for being an observer to the worst days of other people's lives before jet setting the fuck back home to their regular 8-5 and morning Starbucks.

A lot of the Pulitzer's are easier to celebrate. War photojournalists and guys breaking exposes have some skin in the game. More long term features don't rely strictly on pity but actually celebrating their subject's victories. But for more quick snap-and-split type work, it's hard to keep the photographer's motive and technical expertise in the same frame as all the glad handing and promotions spring boarded off some other person's worst day of their life.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2020:01:24 14:20:34
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1000
Image Height667
>>
>>3604625
>person or group of people produces software for others to enjoy at a price
>you just take it without paying for it which is illegal. Inb4 it's not theft etc. Who cares it's still illegal
>bro it's just file sharing it's not theft or should be okay bro

I hope your photographic portfolio is downloaded and printed in full res without your permission, then sold for thousands of dollars without you getting any of the money. Then maybe you'll see what the problem is.

>le it's a shit program anyways xD
If it's so shit why would you use it at all, even bothering to pirate it? Loser lol
>>
>>3604624
it's $0 a month for my cracked cc 2019 lol
>>
>>3605578
Adobe may have the letter of the law on their side but ethically they are scum and I couldn't pay for their software with a clear conscience.
>>
>>3605578
>pirating software from a huge company like adobe is the same as selling photos from a random photographer without permission.
ok man

File: unrelated.jpg (71 KB, 612x408)
71 KB
71 KB JPG
My Tamron 17-50 is giving a me an ERR01 when its on my 80d. The same lens works fine on my 600d, and all my other lenses work fine on the 80d.

What gives? I've cleaned both sets of contacts and updated the firmware on the 80d.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>
>>3605660
Electronic lenses was a mistake
>>
>>3605661
True.
>>
>>3605661
FPBP

>>3605660
Did it get bumped? Might be a ribbon shifted and needs more solidly reseated.
>>
>>3605672
Yeah i had it in my bag while travelling, it might have been bumped. Strange that it would stop working with only one camera.

File: IMG_20200117_110337.jpg (1.4 MB, 2736x3648)
1.4 MB
1.4 MB JPG
I need someone to explain cold shoe flashes to me. I know they are different from hot shoe flashes in the sense that they require a cable to 'communicate' with the camera.
What are the technical terms for this? Pic related is an old flash I have laying around (Pentax AF200S) and I was wondering if such a synchronization cable would also fit on this. Where could I get such a cable seperately?
If not, how do I find a cheap cold shoe flash somewhere?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeHUAWEI
Camera ModelVOG-L29
Camera SoftwareVOG-L29 10.0.0.178(C431E19R2P5)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.6
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width2736
Image Height3648
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Image OrientationUnknown
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2020:01:17 11:03:40
Exposure Time871/500000 sec
F-Numberf/1.6
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating50
Lens Aperturef/1.6
Brightness0 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceDaylight
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length5.56 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2736
Image Height3648
RenderingCustom
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
4 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3602647
>That red thing on the front is definitely where you plug the PC cable.
Ffs it's a meter for the autithyristor function.

>>3602331
OP, almost all flashes have a hotshoe, i.e. can be triggered by a hotshoe on the camera body. Only niche stuff doesn't have a hotshoe connection, usually things that are not supposed to be mounted on the camera's hotshoe, like ring lights and macro lights mounted on the lens, big flashguns mounted on flash brackets on the side of the camera (including huge old contraptions from the 50's) etc. .
I guess what you mean is that some cameras don't have a hotchoe, and have a coldshoe instead. In this case you need
1. a flash that can accept a PC sync cable, which connects to the camera body (or lens)
2. an adapter that has a pc plug on one end that connects on the camera body (or lens), and a hotshoe on the other end that mounts on your cold shoe, turning it into a hotshoe.

There are some cameras that offer no flash syncing (like Leicas before the III), or that require a special cable (non-PC) like the Contax II or IIa (early models). Or like some cheap digital point and shoots (barring their popup flashes).

Tell us what camera you need to mount that flash on, instead of speculating about a hundred possible cases.
>>
>>3602657
Thanks for the lengthy reply man. I'm looking for a flash that would fit on my old Zenit. It has a cold shoe and a plug for a PC cable. Hence the question if such a cable would fit on the lens I posted before, but I suppose that's not possible.
>>
>>3603363
Flashes are dirt cheap since they're not sexy camera purchases. Just buy another flash. Vivitar, Metz and older Pentax flashes will work fine on your Zenit. Try and get one with a sync cable included.

Bear in mind it isn't taking all the work off you by syncing the flash speed. You still need to work out your manual flash power by looking at a scale on your flash or checking with a light meter app. Vivitar 285 HV are still cheap everywhere and they're awesome flashes. But you can't really go wrong.
>>
>>3603383
Yeah my current flash (pic related) has the same kinda chart. What aperture to use for what distance etc. Thanks a lot
man, I'll check it out
>>
>>3602331
Get a hot shoe pc sync adapter (pic related). It mounts in your cold shoe and plugs into the PC sync terminal on your camera.

File: 20191217_160517.jpg (1.75 MB, 1920x2560)
1.75 MB
1.75 MB JPG
Images taken with the one you had with you.
Times when you didn't have the right speed film, or your batteries ran out, or you made the rookie mistake of leaving your camera at home, but you still wanted to take an image.
In the past week or so I've been on a photography trip and I found myself without film a few times. My phone also has stabilisation so it can take useable pictures in lighting situations where even ISO 1600 speed film would be useless. So I decided to swallow my pride and just take phone photos, then deep fry them with lightroom to pretend like the lack of colour detail and horrible noise performance was somehow an artistic choice.
Please post your phonesnaps, I'd love to see what people can do with such limited equipment.
134 replies and 81 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: 20170601_092622.jpg (274 KB, 800x1422)
274 KB
274 KB JPG
>>3586386

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Softwarepaint.net 4.0.21
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution47 dpcm
Vertical Resolution47 dpcm
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
>>3605039
>>3605043
>>3605230
>>3605244
How the fuck do you end up understanding the concept behind 4chan, how to use the whole board but you can't work out a way to rotate an image?
>>
>>3605458
love this
Sometimes i wanna take pics on the bus but i'm not sure if it's a good idea and don't want people to think i'm a creep
>>
>>3605558
Thanks for your low quality response, maybe someone else who actually knows what they're talking about can offer real advice. Do you feel better about yourself after your autistic outburst?
>>

Yes!

Photography is saved.
33 replies and 6 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3603175
>Its a idiot proof feature

i lost the battery compartment door of my camera and cant use it without a grip
>>
>>3598658
Tell him fuck around with its mirrorless cameras for too long and now people are thoroughly entrenched where they want to be. There's all the time in Fanboys an apologist we just jerking off all over the lack of features and I'm one of them idiots unfortunately. The last Canon camera that I'm going to own is going to be a 6D Mark II. I don't plan on migrating to their next latest and greatest the 5 r series we're a weak-kneed lackluster effort to appeal to the people that are currently dumping their shit and going to medium format like the Pentax or the Hasselblad. I honestly don't think that Karen is got anywhere to go but down. They barely do any innovation in lenses anymore, they just repackaged shit for the R Market. It unfortunately came down to them not even bothering to offer 4K video on the 6D Mark II just so they could force a few people to go up to their more expensive video cameras. I was so pissed off about that, that I actually went and dumped my 6D Mark II and sent it to the people at Magic Lantern so they can engineer a hack to use it with 4K video. Just watch what they come up with in a couple of weeks at the rate they're going. The only problem they've got is that the buffering space keeps getting overwritten when they're trying to compress that much video. I think what they have to do is rather than going with one of the more stable compression regimes and go to a more lossy way. You can probably enhance that back with a bit of computational power but the results are still going to be great. Judging from how much static Ram there is in the buffer space on 60 Mark II, my guess is 8GB considering the we that are yet buffers into the memory card
>>
File: 1544446886_IMG_1107948.jpg (2.4 MB, 7124x3336)
2.4 MB
2.4 MB JPG
>>3598658
you're welcome
>>
>>3598683

Because there's no logic to that. Just rotate the fucking camera, it's the easiest possible motion.
>>
Threads on /p/ need a time limit like 2chan.

File: 1576448270366.webm (1.59 MB, 640x640)
1.59 MB
1.59 MB WEBM
ever get harassed by thots when your out shooting?
58 replies and 6 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3592355
No
>>
>>3594822
A d850 isn't a big cumbersome setup you fatty
>>
>>3593623
Sounds like next time you need to get the manager to make it clear to them that you'd be shooting there and aren't just some random with a camera.
>>
>>3592355
Wtf os going on there? Bitch dancing looks retarded
>>
>>3605509
>>3594352
That's the hit or miss girl you boomers.

File: 1.jpg (1.05 MB, 1224x1736)
1.05 MB
1.05 MB JPG
Submit, rate, critique, have fun, etc...

Some photos from my very first roll of film. Last one is a B&W conversion.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width3072
Image Height2048
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2019:11:23 00:06:23
Image Width2448
Image Height3472
213 replies and 121 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3603858
No worries, figured I ask.
>>3603856
I did a little searching, but I'd always take personal experience over search engine results. I'll give them a look though, thanks.
>>
>>3603880
Yeah that makes sense.
Another (I believe) highly regarded one is Dwayne's photo. They have a long history, and are known as being the last photo lab in the US/world to process Kodachrome film... until they stopped. I've never had film processed here, but I believe they've a good reputation.
https://www.dwaynesphoto.com
I've done the math, and Dwayne's is probably cheaper than the Darkroom for individual rolls, but DR is cheaper if you're sending 4 or 5 or more to be processed.

Otherwise I take mine to a local shop, but I suspect they even send it off-site to be processed. I overheard an employee talking to another at that shop saying "sometimes they forget to cut the rolls coming from xx"
>>
>>3583451
Sorry for the late ass reply
That was Gold 200
>>
File: 1711_01A_2_small.jpg (678 KB, 819x1200)
678 KB
678 KB JPG
Bumping this thread to counter balance the amount of gearfaggotry in /p/.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2019 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width3072
Image Height2048
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2020:01:23 23:28:06
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width819
Image Height1200
>>
>>3575137
I want to love this shot, but the top frame misalignment is ruining it!

btw what film is this?

File: 4.jpg (4.66 MB, 5155x3343)
4.66 MB
4.66 MB JPG
ill start

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS REBEL T5
Camera SoftwareWindows Photo Editor 10.0.10011.16384
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2020:01:23 20:34:46
Exposure Time1/250 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePartial
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length35.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width5184
Image Height3456
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
8 replies and 5 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3605308
>Post photos that are important, or otherwise valuable to you
cmon anon...
>>
>>3605311
no
>>
>>3605311
photos like that don't need to be shown to anyone else, because no one else is going to care about them
>>
>>3605261
This one is busy and a bit overexposed. I don't know what I'm supposed to focus on in this image. The subject material is a bit boring as well. I feel like a tighter shot with less exposure that focused on something specific could be really cool.

>>3605262
Again, a bit overexposed. The sky is just a complete wash. The rubble looks interesting, as does the writing in the background and the people standing there, but it all gets a bit blown out. Try out the different metering options on your camera (if you have them). Spot metering works well for subjects in direct sunlight.

>>3605266
Decent enough lighting, the subject material is somewhat interesting, but My eye is drawn immediately to the mountain in the background instead of the scene (I feel like) you're trying to create. Make use of your depth of field. Focus on the backpack and the immediate rocks and let the mountain serve as more of a backdrop.

>>3605270
I like this one. The area around her left eye is a bit soft, but I love the colors and the bokeh.
>>
>>3605270
I remember, she cheated you and wanted to apologize with anal sex ?
A very good picture nonetheless, a bit unreal because of the color around the eyes.

File: gear.png (79 KB, 239x237)
79 KB
79 KB PNG
Previous thread: >>3597650

>All discussion and questions related to gear should take place in this exact thread.
>Redirection and answering questions in this thread is encouraged.
308 replies and 41 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3605520
Get sealed cam for vacations. Em10ii plus general weather sealed zoom, unless you need 4k vid.
>>
anyone got rni all films 4 or 1styles films set for capture one?
>>
File: memetube.jpg (212 KB, 2500x2500)
212 KB
212 KB JPG
I'm okay carrying a sealed DSLR around but i hate changing lens because i live in a dust bowl area. I don't want to take my lens off and i'm "okay" with pics not having the best razor-sharp quality around:
What's the best superzoom lens around? the Tamron meme tube or the Sigma 18-300mm? And can i get something similar for FF?
>>
File: 1579970428088.jpg (422 KB, 750x877)
422 KB
422 KB JPG
finally found a really good condition 645 super with a wlf for 330us, really excited to start shooting with it~
>>
>>3605904
You're lucky Tamron is offering the 35-150mm F/2.8-4 for FF dslr.

I kind of wish they released a similar lens for E-mount.

File: IMG_20200117_124821.jpg (63 KB, 640x640)
63 KB
63 KB JPG
guys, honest opinion, does this look shopped to you or there's just something very wrong with perspective?

I mean the body, especially the legs, looks weird as fuck, but why would you shop them like that, it just looks deformed, so maybe it's just a weird shot
7 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3603255
ambush got your attention. he is a bear so you must be a twink then?
>>
File: idiot.png (12 KB, 546x280)
12 KB
12 KB PNG
>>3603255
>thread bumped with no new post
>check archive
Looks like samefagging is confusing when you're an idiot, lol.
>>
>>3603471

Kek, what a retard.
>>
>>3603166
Fair point
>>
>>3603471
lol idiot


Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.