am i talonted?
post photos of bird talons
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-H1Camera SoftwareCapture One 12 MacintoshSensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)53 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2020:08:13 21:09:08Exposure Time1/140 secF-Numberf/1.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/1.0Brightness1.5 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length35.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1440Image Height2160Exposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessHardSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4260312Laowa 45 f0.95 on macro tubes wide open[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON Z 6Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.0.1 (Windows)Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern792Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2023:11:24 13:45:47Exposure Time1/160 secExposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating400Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingCustomExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypePortraitGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4260313>>4260312But it’s f1.5>>4260315But it’s f2
>>4260333*1.9if you want to be pedantic, be correct
This is like a "yes... but...." thread?>f/1>crop sensorcaptcha 2P2SV[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 5DCamera SoftwareDigital Photo ProfessionalFirmware VersionFirmware Version 1.1.1Serial Number2147483647Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2011:11:12 13:28:55Exposure Time1/4000 secF-Numberf/2.8ISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/2.8Exposure Bias0.7 EVFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length24.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1000Image Height667RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeAv-PriorityFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeSharpnessUnknownSaturationHighContrastHighDigital ZoomUnknownShooting ModeManualImage SizeLargeFocus ModeOne-ShotDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingFineMacro ModeNormalWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation5Sensor ISO Speed65408Camera Actuations4Color Matrix33
>>4260312>>4260313very nice photos
Thread for the best camera brand in existence
posting anything Seagull?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution25 dpiVertical Resolution25 dpiColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width875Image Height875
>>4249307wishdotcom
Has anyone ever bought one of these film point and shoots that show up on aliexpress? Some of them look similar to a fixed lens Olympus Stylus in their design.
>>4249516Yes, watches are welcome too.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1080Image Height1079
Name 1 camera that can do something better than this?24 2.8 prime24-70 f424-240 f5.6Best in class ISfilmic colour profilesHigh bit rates for broadcast HD and 4k captureConnects to your phoneRotating handleTouch focus with trackingSmall and lightTell me why nobody else uses this but me. I have 2 of them. Mogs everything else I have ever used
oh boy, the midwit is fucking retarded he doesn't even know thread he is in.
>>4260441Let's see the post you were replying in >>4260430It was >>4260425Let's see the cameras it was referring to, pic related.Checkmate, atheists. Kneel before cinema.
>the midwit keeps goinghilarious. I'm not partaking in any more of this assfoolery.
>>4260371Didn't the XC10 literally fall apart in your hands?
cANON & cinefag literally the best posters on /p/ ever
Thinking of gifting my sister in law that Sony Alpha NEX-5N. Looks like I can get one on ebay for sub 200 dollars. The point of this is that it has a universal mount. Is this a good entry? anything better for around 200?
I'm trying to get better at portraits. Lets see yours! Or tell me / others how to get better![EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D3100Camera SoftwareVer.1.01Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern848Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationLeft-Hand, BottomHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2019:08:27 08:15:47Exposure Time1/320 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4608Image Height3072RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownISO Speed Used100Image QualityFINEWhite BalanceAUTOFocus ModeAF-AFlash SettingNORMALFlash Compensation0.0 EVISO Speed Requested100Flash Bracket Compensation0.0 EVAE Bracket Compensation162111488.0 EVLens TypeNikon D SeriesLens Range50.0 mm; f/1.8Shooting/Bracketing ModeSingle Frame/OffNoise ReductionOFFCamera Actuations11764
>>4250805Unparalleled Nikon color science
>>4254781It's not gray under the knot. My style is awesome :)
>>4254774>>4254788this is fucking wild what am I looking at? like its awesome, but is this all photoshop? its like a cartoon.>>4254440>>4254441thanks for the tips! thats really helpful! I definitely agree. I'm ( effectively ) shooting 75mm, but I think I'm just gonna pick up a cheapy 50mm dx or maybe go full frame if I find a deal.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D3100Camera SoftwareVer.1.01Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern848Focal Length (35mm Equiv)52 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationLeft-Hand, BottomHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2019:07:28 03:49:27Exposure Time1/3200 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length35.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4608Image Height3072RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownISO Speed Used100Image QualityFINEWhite BalanceAUTOFocus ModeAF-AFlash SettingNORMALFlash Compensation0.0 EVISO Speed Requested100Flash Bracket Compensation0.0 EVAE Bracket Compensation162111488.0 EVLens TypeNikon D SeriesLens Range35.0 mm; f/1.8Shooting/Bracketing ModeSingle Frame/OffNoise ReductionOFFCamera Actuations10592
>>4255071It's not that much phototshop. Fixed her purple makeup and fixed the sky.
>>4253983It's alright
I played rdr2 and got and they have really pretty graphics and a photography mode. Anyone like using it for pics? https://blog.playstation.com/2020/07/16/ghost-of-tsushima-photo-mode-gallery-and-tips-guide/ https://old.reddit.com/r/ghostoftsushima/comments/zvmnnl/weekly_photomode_thread_december_26_2022It's really fun to take pics in the game.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3840Image Height2160
>>4255649
>>4247125It is one of the filters of the game that is emulating real, old photography techniques
>>4247135As in fuji living rent free in his head.
>>4244758I don't play video games bc I’m not a fucking 12yo manbaby.
>>4260286>12yo on 4channel
Serious question, how often do people who take photos like this just use it as a scheme to fuck these girls?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution216 dpiVertical Resolution216 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1125Image Height1344
>>4259878It's only the lowest form if the woman's looks are doing all the heavy lifting of the photo. Just say you don't know how to light a subject or photograph them in interesting ways.
>>4259950California girl born and raised. It doesn't matter where you are from, these photos are distasteful. Always cheap and look like low budget hookers. It's always taken by the most mediocre photographers as well.
>>4259950>my rarified high culture>southern rootscompared to what, uneducated negroes in the cotton fields? Tf talking about, jfc, the south is the home of Americas white trash culture.
>>4260351I'd do tasteful high fashion with nudity but that is about it.>>4260354You're putting a lot of words in my mouth Yankee.
>>4260351I subconsciously tried to read this as the Fresh Prince intro.
>because they open umbrellas indoors! no but really how do i make my selfies ideal with a 8mp camera and lighting wise, how ths fuck and why do you guys use umbrellas? im aware of the rembrandty cheek effect triangle, but is that really considered high standard aka yes dumbass every pro knows this tier.fwiw im a 2d oil painter on the spectrum, i just basically asking about how to use umbrellas to get the best selfie thanks. i hate this vapid shit but no one takes my paintings seriously because once they see how i pgotograph myself for instagramable (evidently THE platform in the usa, at least, ive never had `can i get ur insta`? fail after meeting some other creative type at the kava bar.also how do i generally get into budget pro photography uwu gimme like a 700 $ budget and tips and tricks, from the ground up counting camera and set up drapery etc. mainly inviting pretty gals to be photographed professionally to then be oil painted. also last question how 2 best photograph artworks and commo mistakes made? pic relzted is my artwork of female classmate who loved to pzint forests from uni. next post selfie to follow.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationUnknown
shit sorry im still figuring out exif data and my original image keeps giving image appears corrupt when i up,oad my b 1 sec as i switch to my macbook air
front camera is 14mp though i think the selfie cam is dumb cant you just angle a mirror and use the front camera this is my lighting setup
sorry imma read the wiki and salvage this thread i swear
>>4260458There's nothing wrong with the lighting. You just have:> weak jaw> weak chin> big lips> boring outfit> uninteresting background
Holy fuck, I almost fell onto the spectrum from trying to read OP.
Now that the dust has settled, can we all agree that this won't change a thing?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1280Image Height720Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4259953It's going to be the same as A1 but with a firmware update that everyone wants
>>4258233>/p/>the 5d3 sold well because it was a cheap video camera
>>4260361every wedding photog got one to pump 1080p wedding slopcinefaggots and geeks ported magic lantern to it to shoot sweet raw videosit was not in any way shape or form in the same use case bracket that was later stolen by A9
>>4260204Yeah, wait for the A1 III
>>4260465If all goes well, I'll need a 2nd camera by then so it's either get an A1 or maybe a A7S and a lens.
Fly mafia editionOld: >>4193576[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePanasonicCamera ModelDC-GH5M2Camera SoftwareSILKYPIX Developer Studio Pro 10Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)100 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2023:07:29 13:47:30Exposure Time1/320 secF-Numberf/6.3Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating800Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2000Image Height2000RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4250856Try harder[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera ModelCanon EOS M50Equipment MakeCanonCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 12.0.1 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)Image Width5392Image Height3890Image OrientationUnknownImage Created2023:02:25 00:01:35ISO Speed Rating320Exposure ProgramShutter PriorityColor Space InformationUncalibratedWhite BalanceAutoRenderingNormalMetering ModePatternExposure ModeAutoExposure Time333/10000 secFlashNo FlashScene Capture TypeStandardLight SourceUnknown
>>4260385>>4250856Are you sure you're not the same pothead? It looks equally bad.
>>4260390The focus-stacked macro with controlled lighting and a black background looks like a missed-focus snapshot of a nug on a wood desk?
>>4260409Yes.A. It's not entirely black.B. It's focus stacked seams are disturbing to the eyes.C. Subject worse than the one posted above.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>4260429It's a good thing I didn't slide the contrast bar all the way to the left like you did
young Felix edition
>>4257061the best. make sure it's one with a leica lens
>>4251053Snow at night with camera flash is awesome[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePENTAX CorporationCamera ModelPENTAX Optio S60Camera SoftwareOptio S60 Ver 1.00Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.6Focal Length (35mm Equiv)35 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2023:11:27 18:01:23Exposure Time1/40 secF-Numberf/2.6ISO Speed Rating320Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashFlash, CompulsoryFocal Length5.80 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2816Image Height2112RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeClose View
commandowagen
Fujifilm FinePix J20.
>>4251053[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.3Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationRight-Hand, TopHorizontal Resolution180 dpiVertical Resolution180 dpiImage Created2023:11:30 20:27:12Exposure Time1/30 secF-Numberf/3.3Exposure Bias0 EVFocal Length4.10 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4000Image Height3000RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain Up
I recently bought this photobook called Liquid Night from Bill Henson as I really enjoy this kind of style for 80’s street photography, heavy in neon signs and that method of colour rendering that’s quite specific to that era.I’m going to post a couple of pics from it as I’d like to have /p’s input on what kind of technical methods were used to get those pics and specifically the colouring/ cinematic style. Apparently, it’s shot in 35mm colour negatives.Also interested if any of you have recommendations of photographers or photobooks that have the same vibe or atmosphere. I guess Bruce Davidson’s Subway is close to it, and in films it would probably be The Warriors.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCruse ScannerCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 24.6 (Macintosh)Image-Specific Properties:Image Width3600Image Height2571Number of Bits Per Component16, 16, 16Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2023:07:19 12:34:42Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1323Image Height895
>>4252826>>4252827>>4252828>>4252829>>4252832>>4252834>>4252836>>4252837>>4252839>>4252840>>4252841why did they make a book from outtakes
>>4252837extreme Lindy
>>4252824Are there any good casino photography books?
>>4252824How would one archive similar results today?
>>4252824Cool next time I'm in the 80's I'll find it really useful.which fucking 80 are you even talking about, bc from 1981 to 1985 to 1989 literally nothing looked even remotely similar. Goddamn kids durrr eiiiighties maaaan stfu quite honestly
Why is it impossible to get quality prints?Just got my order from FujiFilm (phone camera) and the photos are terrible, the place I tried before that even worse.
>>4260241Your whole argument is "it works on my machine"Don't even bother
>>4260249Your mileage may vary
>>4260230Op here, glad you confirmed Fuji is ok, if I get hold of a Camera I'll know to try them again.
>>4258698just use your phone™
>>4260264myfujifilm in sweden is ok, i don't know about "the" fuji or such
vaporware no more?https://www.kodak.com/en/motion/page/super-8-camera/
>>4256808Film hipsters. It also seems to be popular with the skate crowd, (who are often film hipsters.) Though the price is fucking nuts. If it maintained the original $500ish price tag then ok, toy for someone with lots of money to throw around.Personally I'd like a digital Super 8 cartridge, then I can use the old cameras I've been collecting. (Yeah, I could just use my DSLR and apply a filter, but what's the fun in that?)https://youtu.be/Dq85ZsAZxso[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width600Image Height440
>>4259810Digitize it with a little wolverine for a couple hundie buck, bc most of the services just use them anyway now. But if you do it yourself you can zoom that fucker in and make 2 scans, a 1080p of the left 2/3 of it and another of the right 2/3 of it, then overlay them back together in post and have yourself a nearly 2k scan of that shit. Nothing you can do about developing costs tho. Still worth it. Light does a lot of crazy beautiful shit in those tiny lenses & films.
>>4259606Why kodak, makers of 35mm film & wishing to sell more of it, doesnt make this camera, w a motor giving you 30fps for modern displays & just make higher capacity rolls, is beyond me. …ohhh right bc then they’d either have to charge $100 for a 1min roll, or devalue their 36 exposure rolls intended for the photo market.
>>4259844You can synch audio to it. What's $5000 when film is expensive? I guarantee that people will jump on them as soon as they're available.
>>4260304>$5000 when film is expensive?Film that will last you over a year