>>3950915
Doesn't look like it

>>3950908
how does one create grain like that

File: DSCN7060.jpg (4.13 MB, 3156x4208)

4.13 MB JPG

thoughts/critiques?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON
Camera Model	COOLPIX S9900
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 4.4 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.7
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	25 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2021:10:11 19:43:53
Exposure Time	1/5 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	125
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	4.50 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3953553
Yeah definitely look like light leaks. Pretty cheap and easy to replace the seals on your camera.

>>3953545
Adds some style but these are light leaks friend!!

>>3953710
why would he replace the seals? this shit saves what would otherwise be uninteresting snapshits, he should just leave it

File: rTTwkGv.jpg (798 KB, 4630x2992)

798 KB JPG

>>3953710
That looks more like underagitation, I've got pretty similar results with Svema CND 64 when I just started developing color.
Some insulation tape wouldn't hurt OP's camera tho, just in case)

>>3953832
Nah with yours we can tell its from the way the film is rolled up during developing. his is "flat" it means its from when it was inside the camera being exposed.

Update timing in soon guys. Scanning throughout the night tonight.

>>3951592
Did he died?

>>3946704
Oh fuck it begins

>>3953777
F he succumbed to Chernobyl radiation

>>3946062
Бляяя, чтo б я ceйчac oтдaл зa этy пpoявoчнyю мaшинy

File: 51611062844_2f8d45d177_k.jpg (412 KB, 1638x2048)

412 KB JPG

>>3953379

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: 51610396391_dfbc2f0583_k.jpg (252 KB, 2047x1365)

252 KB JPG

>>3953381

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: DSCF0633 2.jpg (1.92 MB, 1935x2709)

1.92 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	X-T3
Camera Software	Capture One 21 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	32 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2021:10:19 20:56:30
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/9.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/9.0
Brightness	7.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	21.20 mm
Image Width	1935
Image Height	2709
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: E18137D3-60A8-4BE7-9887-4(...).jpg (555 KB, 1440x1800)

555 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Instagram
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2021:10:08 06:57:25
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1440
Image Height	1800
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: Screen Shot 2021-10-21 at(...).png (2.57 MB, 1104x1736)

2.57 MB PNG

>>3953819

File: flattering.jpg (184 KB, 2000x1333)

184 KB JPG

>>3953164
>fisheye perspective and face correction
Are we really at the point where “““AI””” is having to correct for normies taking portraits with wide-angle lenses 1ft away from their subject? Wasn't the move to multiple cameras supposed to fix this?

>holds it some funny way that makes the phone automatically engage
Is it not just a setting in the app somewhere?

>be 30, back in school
The fuck kind of context is this? This could be any time period.
If you're still in school at 30 maybe you're not ready for a smartphone.

>>3953207

not exactly, just kind of upset that technology now is not intuitive in a way that i understand, and im not even that old.

>>3953292
>Is it not just a setting in the app somewhere?

i don't think so. she said you have to hold the phone upside down at a low angle to get it to do "the thing", i guess it's like a "hack" or something that has to do with how the phone recognizes a subject.

i really only posted in hopes that someone might have some insight to cellphone photography because apparently it's more complicated than point-and-shoot.

Ok boomer

>>3953164
>22yo knows how to take a good portrait because of hours of practice and staring at herself in camera
>30yo on /p can't into perspective and believes there must be a magic fisheye mode

>>3953634
>30yo on /p can't into perspective and believes there must be a magic fisheye mode

she told me to hold it upside down and at a low angle. i guess if you don't know what she's talking about either im not alone in this.

>>3953718
Seems pretty swag;
I liked the shutter that closes over the sensor, focus breathing compensation for video, video stabilisation in post, 4:2:2 10 bit 4k video, USB webcam straight out of the box, using the same color science as their pro cine cameras.

This thing is gonna fly off shelves.

>>3953736
It has the newer processor also and uses the newer menu system from the A7SIII and Alpha1 instead of the shitty one in older A7 III.

>>3953468
It's good for portraits close up or with longer lenses. The 25mm 1.8 can be a little soft wide open, which isn't usually a bad thing for portraits. Bokeh is minimal with a standard lens until you get below f/4 or get in close.


>>3953486
This is probably the best option. You lose some features and I'm not sure if the em10 iv is even 20mp. For the price of the 10 iv, I'd be looking for an em5.

Or not go MFT at all. They're incredibly compact and loaded with features you usually only find on cameras that cost twice as much, but the raw specs are lacking if you've never handled older "pro" DSLRs. Even the entry level ones are not entry level cameras but they aren't as competitive as they were. Unless you do video or travel.

>>3953604
The MK IV is the first of the E-M10 line that's 20MP.
I'd probably try to find a used E-M5 MK II, though. Same sensor, more features.

>>3953136
go full frame or get a Fuji, basically no reason for cameras like this to exist

>>3953685
MFT isnt very different to APSC outside having superior stabilization

>>3953705
this. the problem doesn't lie with the sensor size, it's the way panasonic and olympus let the system stagnate over the years.

>>3953711

>>3939842

>>3946197
>AI and AI-s are Double Gauss
Wrong, Pre-AI had three Double Gauss designs: P, PC and K or Shin.
Sonnar had one which is the 10.5cm Silver.

>>3950503
>>3950504
It's way easier to recognize them via the front element threads, Sonnars are silver/chrome-nosed and the D Gauss are black. Both are great stuff but slightly different, Sonnar swirls, has more blades and it's a tiny bit sharper while the Coated D Gauss has superior colours and doesn't flare as hard.

>>3948461
am I not allowed to mess around with a shitty lens?

>>3948415
based
>>3948461
Anon, one day you'll understand sharpness and contrast isn't everything.

>>3943841
I'm curious, what kind of lens do people take pictures of diorama, do they simply use a macro lens or something else, I thought macro lens might be too close to capture the whole scene?

I used to have the 85 1.4d, loved that lens and kinda regret selling it because my Art 84 1.4 doesn't fully work with my F100.

>>3953390
That would be great but I also don't see it happening unfortunately
But maybe a good rangefinder emulation mode?
Don't know how they would/could make it work, but it would be great even if it could also seem gimmicky (though the same can be said by some about the whole camera, so I'm not sure it matters)

>>3953391
>i justify my mental illness and shitting up the board by believing there is someone else as bad as me

Time for a moment of self reflection anon

>>3953411
>rangefinder emulation mode?
not interested. 0% interest.

>>3953411
>rangefinder emulation mode?
fujis have something that and if you use it you will find that it's quite useless

>>3953660
Yeah I can believe that

>>3953543
>Pentax K1
>that low
I refuse to believe it

Man, so much autistic faggotry in this thread. Bunch of charts and not a single photo posted. At the end of the day what good is a camera if you don't use it? That's why I made the thread in the first place, to know what bullshit to get around of.

Classic digicuck thread

>>3953627
In terms of stills it seems most cameras nowadays are head to head, especially if you know how to post-process.
In my multiple sample downloads and tweaks the K1 and the Z7 are actually above many usual suspects like the A7(R)III or the R5, the difference and the actual fee paid by most consumers is video features.
And if you are serious about video then the only cool kid options (full frame RAW) are the Panasonic S1H, which is also a pretty good stills camera sans shitty colors that need moderate adjusting, and Sony A7SIII or FX series.

Right now the only plausible camera that can do both great stills and great video is the Sony A1 if you exclude the very accurate skin tones which makes most peoples faces' patchy and bumpy, would include the A7SIII but 12mp does fall a bit short if you want to do big landscape, i mean it can be done but nothing to print considerably if you want a f/64-style shot.

>>3952106
Concur

How to replicate this effect digitally?

>>3951678

I moved away about a year ago. I went back to Vic in March and it looks like it's hell on earth now. Homeless everywhere.

>>3953628

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/xtwy9d

>>3953628
Take three photos, demosaic them, and take blue channel from photo 1, red channel from photo 2 and green channel from photo 3. Use these 3 channels as your monochrome source images and then proceed with any other trichromy method

>>3953629
>>3953631
Thanks

>>3953628
Haven't done it but I'd try to find a landscape with clouds, smoke and wind flappy trees, put camera on tripod and take three snaps few sec apart. Then pick one colour layer from each snap and slap em together. Voilà!

>>3953492
there are wide angle lenses you can adapt to an rx100 variant or zv1, but I dont know how good and wide. vloggers use it.

File: IMG_0267.jpg (3.8 MB, 2816x2112)

3.8 MB JPG

>>3952749
Or this, for that matter. Silver vomit on the top of a mountain is as much of a mystery as whoose the troon.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon PowerShot SD630
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Lens Size	5.80 - 17.40 mm
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.00
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	180 dpi
Vertical Resolution	180 dpi
Image Created	2007:09:15 13:43:36
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
F-Number	f/3.5
Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Auto
Focal Length	8.46 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2816
Image Height	2112
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Center-Weighted
ISO Speed Rating	Auto
Sharpness	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Large
Focus Mode	Single
Drive Mode	Timed
Flash Mode	Auto
Compression Setting	Superfine
Self-Timer Length	10 sec
Macro Mode	Normal
Subject Distance	7.760 m
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	160
Image Number	100-0267

File: IMG_0273.jpg (2.74 MB, 2816x2112)

2.74 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon PowerShot SD630
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Lens Size	5.80 - 17.40 mm
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.00
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	180 dpi
Vertical Resolution	180 dpi
Image Created	2007:09:15 14:56:35
Exposure Time	1/400 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Auto
Focal Length	5.80 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2816
Image Height	2112
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Center-Weighted
ISO Speed Rating	Auto
Sharpness	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Large
Focus Mode	Single
Drive Mode	Single
Flash Mode	Auto
Compression Setting	Superfine
Macro Mode	Normal
Subject Distance	2.060 m
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	160
Image Number	100-0273

File: IMG_0277.jpg (3.09 MB, 2816x2112)

3.09 MB JPG

>>3952751

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon PowerShot SD630
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Lens Size	5.80 - 17.40 mm
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.00
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	180 dpi
Vertical Resolution	180 dpi
Image Created	2007:09:15 15:00:41
Exposure Time	1/500 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Auto
Focal Length	5.80 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2816
Image Height	2112
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Center-Weighted
ISO Speed Rating	Auto
Sharpness	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Large
Focus Mode	Single
Drive Mode	Single
Flash Mode	Auto
Compression Setting	Superfine
Macro Mode	Normal
Subject Distance	65.530 m
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	160
Image Number	100-0277

File: IMG_0270.jpg (2.44 MB, 2816x2112)

2.44 MB JPG

>>3952752

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon PowerShot SD630
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Lens Size	5.80 - 17.40 mm
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.00
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	180 dpi
Vertical Resolution	180 dpi
Image Created	2007:09:15 14:28:36
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/3.5
Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Auto
Focal Length	8.46 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2816
Image Height	2112
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Center-Weighted
ISO Speed Rating	Auto
Sharpness	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Large
Focus Mode	Single
Drive Mode	Single
Flash Mode	Auto
Compression Setting	Superfine
Macro Mode	Normal
Subject Distance	3.080 m
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	160
Image Number	100-0270

File: P9030050-1.jpg (1.09 MB, 1600x1200)

1.09 MB JPG

Shitdigi thread? I don't have a lot of new stuff.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OLYMPUS OPTICAL CO.,LTD
Camera Model	C120,D380
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2021:09:06 11:08:09
Exposure Time	1/50 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Daylight
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	4.50 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>3953503
11k would be cheap for screen, battery, gimbal and camera. You're not saying it's 7k for all?

>>3953503
the cheapo one, yes
the full 8k version costs $11,499

>>3953493
>For now
not so sure about that
the tiny gimbal cradle and the low payload limit are a pretty extreme limitation, all you can ever have is slow or simplistic primes with as few elements as possible

>>3953515
Yes it is

>>39534800
Man, you must really be into videography to be looking at a piece of equipment like that. Mind showing us some of your work you've already done?