File: R0020263-Edit.jpg (2.97 MB, 2481x2481)

2.97 MB JPG

I'm pulling the trigger on a Ricoh GR III this weekend. Got a good deal on it.

The Ricoh GR (2013) is my favourite camera of all time so I'm pretty excited.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	GR
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.0 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2018:10:24 04:56:30
Exposure Time	1/40 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Brightness	3.6 EV
Exposure Bias	1 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	18.30 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Hard

>>3603184
Fuck off to /spg/!

>>3605068
I cleaned mine last year, took me two tries to get all the dust off, but it wasn't very difficult. There's a good manual online and the risk of ruining the camera is low.

>>3605111
>OP wants something small to carry around
>recommend OP bulky wrist breaking shit
Quality posting, anon. You may as well have recommended a view camera.

File: Shield Lens.jpg (128 KB, 1024x576)

128 KB JPG

>>3605194
>Mirrorless are lacking good pancake lenses.
Ain't that the truth.

>>3605229
Anon, said, "good."

File: R1-01738-031A.jpg (776 KB, 1228x1818)

776 KB JPG

>>3605794
2/5

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2020:01:19 12:15:09

File: R1-01817-0011.jpg (648 KB, 1228x1818)

648 KB JPG

>>3605795
3/5

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2020:01:19 12:16:18

File: R1-01887-014A.jpg (982 KB, 1818x1228)

982 KB JPG

>>3605796
4/5

File: R1-01886-0008.jpg (1.39 MB, 1818x1228)

1.39 MB JPG

>>3605798
5/5

>>3601455
>he only had about 6 seconds to take the shot
Most photogs can focus a view camera in 6 seconds, let alone an SLR or RF.

>>3602393
It's just 1 thing less to think about. It's a beneficial convenience and you get more time for composition.

>>3601191
A9 version 1 and 2

>>3601210

Weird that there's an afro video posted praising Sony. Have they truly bought everyone out there?

>>3601191
tesla

>>3602509
Sorry. I was in the bushes fapping.

>>3602520
>>3602642
I will be back this Friday to look for him!

>>3604824
Ok. Should i keep my dick out then, or what?

>>3604824
bad ass man. i have faith that this time will be good.

>>3604838
kek

>>3604777
if the thead is still up I might post some old test shots or I'll take more tomorrow night. camera is in my other car

File: DSC01788.jpg (4.7 MB, 6000x4000)

4.7 MB JPG

>>3604782
>>3604777
hopefully it didnt kill the exif when I made it smol to post on 4channel
I'll admit i didnt try very hard to set the focus on this because it was bloody cold and 1 am.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	paint.net 4.0.21
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	45 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2020:01:24 01:46:29
Exposure Time	30 sec
F-Number	f/3.5
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Brightness	-5.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	30.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Soft
Saturation	Low
Sharpness	Soft

>>3605695
just want to say I waited 2 fucking days for your pictures

File: DSC01776.jpg (2.78 MB, 6000x4000)

2.78 MB JPG

>>3605698
i'm sorry :( its hard to get motivation to do this stuff.

pic of my shitbox. effect looks way better on more shiny and not silver cars but I dont feel comfortable posting other people's cars here.
This is what I would mostly be doing at close range. The lens does it I guess but the background and foreground are meh, no bokeh, too dark in some spots.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	paint.net 4.0.21
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	45 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2020:01:24 00:52:55
Exposure Time	30 sec
F-Number	f/3.5
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Brightness	-5.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	30.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Soft
Saturation	Low
Sharpness	Soft

>>3605702
That is quite the spoiler you got there mate.

File: 2011-and-2003-winners.jpg (170 KB, 1000x667)

170 KB JPG

Some of the Pulitzer prize winners for feature photography always struck me as a mixed bag, ethically. One one hand, you have powerful stories that should be shared. On the other, you often have a red carpet affair and a plaque on the wall that applauds someone for being an observer to the worst days of other people's lives before jet setting the fuck back home to their regular 8-5 and morning Starbucks.

A lot of the Pulitzer's are easier to celebrate. War photojournalists and guys breaking exposes have some skin in the game. More long term features don't rely strictly on pity but actually celebrating their subject's victories. But for more quick snap-and-split type work, it's hard to keep the photographer's motive and technical expertise in the same frame as all the glad handing and promotions spring boarded off some other person's worst day of their life.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2020:01:24 14:20:34
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	667

>>3604625
>person or group of people produces software for others to enjoy at a price
>you just take it without paying for it which is illegal. Inb4 it's not theft etc. Who cares it's still illegal
>bro it's just file sharing it's not theft or should be okay bro

I hope your photographic portfolio is downloaded and printed in full res without your permission, then sold for thousands of dollars without you getting any of the money. Then maybe you'll see what the problem is.

>le it's a shit program anyways xD
If it's so shit why would you use it at all, even bothering to pirate it? Loser lol

>>3604624
it's $0 a month for my cracked cc 2019 lol

>>3605578
Adobe may have the letter of the law on their side but ethically they are scum and I couldn't pay for their software with a clear conscience.

>>3605578
>pirating software from a huge company like adobe is the same as selling photos from a random photographer without permission.
ok man

>>3605660
Electronic lenses was a mistake

>>3605661
True.

>>3605661
FPBP

>>3605660
Did it get bumped? Might be a ribbon shifted and needs more solidly reseated.

>>3605672
Yeah i had it in my bag while travelling, it might have been bumped. Strange that it would stop working with only one camera.

>>3602647
>That red thing on the front is definitely where you plug the PC cable.
Ffs it's a meter for the autithyristor function.

>>3602331
OP, almost all flashes have a hotshoe, i.e. can be triggered by a hotshoe on the camera body. Only niche stuff doesn't have a hotshoe connection, usually things that are not supposed to be mounted on the camera's hotshoe, like ring lights and macro lights mounted on the lens, big flashguns mounted on flash brackets on the side of the camera (including huge old contraptions from the 50's) etc. .
I guess what you mean is that some cameras don't have a hotchoe, and have a coldshoe instead. In this case you need
1. a flash that can accept a PC sync cable, which connects to the camera body (or lens)
2. an adapter that has a pc plug on one end that connects on the camera body (or lens), and a hotshoe on the other end that mounts on your cold shoe, turning it into a hotshoe.

There are some cameras that offer no flash syncing (like Leicas before the III), or that require a special cable (non-PC) like the Contax II or IIa (early models). Or like some cheap digital point and shoots (barring their popup flashes).

Tell us what camera you need to mount that flash on, instead of speculating about a hundred possible cases.

>>3602657
Thanks for the lengthy reply man. I'm looking for a flash that would fit on my old Zenit. It has a cold shoe and a plug for a PC cable. Hence the question if such a cable would fit on the lens I posted before, but I suppose that's not possible.

>>3603363
Flashes are dirt cheap since they're not sexy camera purchases. Just buy another flash. Vivitar, Metz and older Pentax flashes will work fine on your Zenit. Try and get one with a sync cable included.

Bear in mind it isn't taking all the work off you by syncing the flash speed. You still need to work out your manual flash power by looking at a scale on your flash or checking with a light meter app. Vivitar 285 HV are still cheap everywhere and they're awesome flashes. But you can't really go wrong.

>>3603383
Yeah my current flash (pic related) has the same kinda chart. What aperture to use for what distance etc. Thanks a lot
man, I'll check it out

File: impact_scs_mpc_male_pc_to(...).jpg (24 KB, 500x500)

24 KB JPG

>>3602331
Get a hot shoe pc sync adapter (pic related). It mounts in your cold shoe and plugs into the PC sync terminal on your camera.

File: 20170601_092622.jpg (274 KB, 800x1422)

274 KB JPG

>>3586386

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	paint.net 4.0.21
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	47 dpcm
Vertical Resolution	47 dpcm
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>3605039
>>3605043
>>3605230
>>3605244
How the fuck do you end up understanding the concept behind 4chan, how to use the whole board but you can't work out a way to rotate an image?

>>3605458
love this
Sometimes i wanna take pics on the bus but i'm not sure if it's a good idea and don't want people to think i'm a creep

>>3605558
Thanks for your low quality response, maybe someone else who actually knows what they're talking about can offer real advice. Do you feel better about yourself after your autistic outburst?

>>3603175
>Its a idiot proof feature

i lost the battery compartment door of my camera and cant use it without a grip

>>3598658
Tell him fuck around with its mirrorless cameras for too long and now people are thoroughly entrenched where they want to be. There's all the time in Fanboys an apologist we just jerking off all over the lack of features and I'm one of them idiots unfortunately. The last Canon camera that I'm going to own is going to be a 6D Mark II. I don't plan on migrating to their next latest and greatest the 5 r series we're a weak-kneed lackluster effort to appeal to the people that are currently dumping their shit and going to medium format like the Pentax or the Hasselblad. I honestly don't think that Karen is got anywhere to go but down. They barely do any innovation in lenses anymore, they just repackaged shit for the R Market. It unfortunately came down to them not even bothering to offer 4K video on the 6D Mark II just so they could force a few people to go up to their more expensive video cameras. I was so pissed off about that, that I actually went and dumped my 6D Mark II and sent it to the people at Magic Lantern so they can engineer a hack to use it with 4K video. Just watch what they come up with in a couple of weeks at the rate they're going. The only problem they've got is that the buffering space keeps getting overwritten when they're trying to compress that much video. I think what they have to do is rather than going with one of the more stable compression regimes and go to a more lossy way. You can probably enhance that back with a bit of computational power but the results are still going to be great. Judging from how much static Ram there is in the buffer space on 60 Mark II, my guess is 8GB considering the we that are yet buffers into the memory card

File: 1544446886_IMG_1107948.jpg (2.4 MB, 7124x3336)

2.4 MB JPG

>>3598658
you're welcome

>>3598683

Because there's no logic to that. Just rotate the fucking camera, it's the easiest possible motion.

Threads on /p/ need a time limit like 2chan.

>>3592355
No

>>3594822
A d850 isn't a big cumbersome setup you fatty

>>3593623
Sounds like next time you need to get the manager to make it clear to them that you'd be shooting there and aren't just some random with a camera.

>>3592355
Wtf os going on there? Bitch dancing looks retarded

>>3605509
>>3594352
That's the hit or miss girl you boomers.

>>3603858
No worries, figured I ask.
>>3603856
I did a little searching, but I'd always take personal experience over search engine results. I'll give them a look though, thanks.

>>3603880
Yeah that makes sense.
Another (I believe) highly regarded one is Dwayne's photo. They have a long history, and are known as being the last photo lab in the US/world to process Kodachrome film... until they stopped. I've never had film processed here, but I believe they've a good reputation.
https://www.dwaynesphoto.com
I've done the math, and Dwayne's is probably cheaper than the Darkroom for individual rolls, but DR is cheaper if you're sending 4 or 5 or more to be processed.

Otherwise I take mine to a local shop, but I suspect they even send it off-site to be processed. I overheard an employee talking to another at that shop saying "sometimes they forget to cut the rolls coming from xx"

>>3583451
Sorry for the late ass reply
That was Gold 200

File: 1711_01A_2_small.jpg (678 KB, 819x1200)

678 KB JPG

Bumping this thread to counter balance the amount of gearfaggotry in /p/.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2019 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3072
Image Height	2048
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2020:01:23 23:28:06
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	819
Image Height	1200

>>3575137
I want to love this shot, but the top frame misalignment is ruining it!

btw what film is this?

>>3605308
>Post photos that are important, or otherwise valuable to you
cmon anon...

>>3605311
no

>>3605311
photos like that don't need to be shown to anyone else, because no one else is going to care about them

>>3605261
This one is busy and a bit overexposed. I don't know what I'm supposed to focus on in this image. The subject material is a bit boring as well. I feel like a tighter shot with less exposure that focused on something specific could be really cool.

>>3605262
Again, a bit overexposed. The sky is just a complete wash. The rubble looks interesting, as does the writing in the background and the people standing there, but it all gets a bit blown out. Try out the different metering options on your camera (if you have them). Spot metering works well for subjects in direct sunlight.

>>3605266
Decent enough lighting, the subject material is somewhat interesting, but My eye is drawn immediately to the mountain in the background instead of the scene (I feel like) you're trying to create. Make use of your depth of field. Focus on the backpack and the immediate rocks and let the mountain serve as more of a backdrop.

>>3605270
I like this one. The area around her left eye is a bit soft, but I love the colors and the bokeh.

>>3605270
I remember, she cheated you and wanted to apologize with anal sex ?
A very good picture nonetheless, a bit unreal because of the color around the eyes.

>>3605520
Get sealed cam for vacations. Em10ii plus general weather sealed zoom, unless you need 4k vid.

anyone got rni all films 4 or 1styles films set for capture one?

File: memetube.jpg (212 KB, 2500x2500)

212 KB JPG

I'm okay carrying a sealed DSLR around but i hate changing lens because i live in a dust bowl area. I don't want to take my lens off and i'm "okay" with pics not having the best razor-sharp quality around:
What's the best superzoom lens around? the Tamron meme tube or the Sigma 18-300mm? And can i get something similar for FF?

File: 1579970428088.jpg (422 KB, 750x877)

422 KB JPG

finally found a really good condition 645 super with a wlf for 330us, really excited to start shooting with it~

>>3605904
You're lucky Tamron is offering the 35-150mm F/2.8-4 for FF dslr.

I kind of wish they released a similar lens for E-mount.

>>3603255
ambush got your attention. he is a bear so you must be a twink then?

File: idiot.png (12 KB, 546x280)

12 KB PNG

>>3603255
>thread bumped with no new post
>check archive
Looks like samefagging is confusing when you're an idiot, lol.

>>3603471

Kek, what a retard.

>>3603166
Fair point

>>3603471
lol idiot