[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam box!

🎉 Happy Birthday 4chan 🎉


[Advertise on 4chan]

[Catalog] [Archive]

File: Eric-Kim.jpg (49 KB, 800x500)
49 KB
49 KB JPG
Street photography of individuals is a violation and I'm tired of pretending its not. Its like being a paparazzi for civilians, hard to imagine anything lower.
32 replies and 5 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4234828
>Afraid of /p/hags.
>Enjoying cultural enrichment.

Cucked Frenchies
>>
>>4235180
>>4235180
>lenses
>>
>>I even had the military telling me to leave the area because I was trying to take photograph of the outside of a metro station.
based
>>
>>4233661
kek, rent free, seethe harder, cope harder and dilate
>>
>>4234221
Counterpoint, yes it is. Being in public means you have no reasonable expectation of privacy. If they don't want to be identifiable, they can wear a hat, sunglasses, or a mask. Masks are super fucking normalized now. Don't get your panties in a twist.

Leicas are great, but so are every other camera. They had the 35mm special sauce in the 30s-50s, then the world caught up. That said, I'd love an M11.

File: 3553.jpg (53 KB, 890x1290)
53 KB
53 KB JPG
Is photojournalism the most pathetic genre? It is filled with bunch of sadists who are forever on the look for miserable shit so they can make money and a name for themselves. Think about it there's no photojournalism without miserable shit so that shit makes their career possible so in an indirect perverse way they must desire more misery so can pay their bills.
12 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4233779
Why does that photo still make people seethe so much? That photo is the truth of this scumfuck evil planet. How many people/kids are taking their last breaths right now? How many of them are facing extreme injustice and how of them anyone can save? People live in apathy and die in apathy other than extreme rare instances when they're posturing. If we could suddenly become aware of every horror that is happening right now we would blow our brain out instantly. And this what Kevin Carter did. I would say he was way more sensitive and empathic than every other posturing "humanistic" photojournalist with a perverse desire for "change" and """hope""" in humanity.
>>
>>4233543
>no photojournalism without miserable shit
Sports is not that miserable, so you are wrong
>>
just make sure it doesnt look like a gun or anything
https://youtu.be/5rXPrfnU3G0?si=T180YhurFPWq8GIt
>>
>>4233553
>Where do I sign up

Hah! >>4233546 is dreaming.

The most exotic the vast majority of photojournalists get is the occasional traffic accident and some long forgotten minor celeb who is in town to cut the ribbon on the new shopping mall.
>>
>>4235124
>that lonely photojournalist who never left his town
oof, that post wasn't for "him"

File: 476A7570.jpg (1.18 MB, 1920x1280)
1.18 MB
1.18 MB JPG
Missed a shot? How and why
Got excited and my shutter speed was too slow. Rookie mistake. I am a rookie.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS R7
Camera SoftwareDigital Photo Professional
Lens Size100.00 - 400.00 mm
Firmware VersionFirmware Version 1.3.1
Lens NameRF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution350 dpi
Vertical Resolution350 dpi
Image Created2023:09:17 15:33:30
Exposure Time1/125 sec
F-Numberf/8.0
Exposure ProgramManual
Lens Aperturef/8.0
Exposure Bias-3 EV
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length400.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1920
Image Height1280
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Exposure ModeManual
Focus TypeAuto
Metering ModeEvaluative
ISO Speed RatingAuto
SharpnessUnknown
SaturationNormal
ContrastNormal
Shooting ModeManual
Image SizeUnknown
Focus ModeAI Servo
Drive ModeUnknown
Flash ModeOff
Compression SettingFine
Macro ModeNormal
Subject Distance64.330 m
White BalanceDaylight
Exposure Compensation0
Sensor ISO Speed160
Color Matrix129
21 replies and 6 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4234805
do you swallow?
>>
>>4234807
I don't have a Fuji, no
>>
>>4234805
it was a seagull. do you seagull?
>>
>>4232184
Didn't have my camera

Image related
>>
>>4232184
This actually came out pretty cool

It has been 3 months since I stopped doing any photography. I feel like I have "shot everything" in my area. I've walked up and down about every street in my town and I've covered a lot of two other nearby towns. I've been to the local parks, the state parks. I've been on day trips and I am bored. I feel like there is nothing new out there to shoot or I need to travel at least 4 hours to get to a place I feel I haven't thoroughly shot already.

How do you guys keep finding new stuff to shoot? Or if you're not, how do you keep it interesting?
23 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4234634
>I guess I have this feeling that if someone sees my instagram and goes "hey didn't he post another picture of the same thing 3 months ago?" the photo isn't exciting anymore. I think that's probably not true.
social media has truly rotted your brain. you are poisoned by obsession with novelty for engagement. log off for a while and shoot what interests you without regard for how it will be received if you post it
>>
>>4234613
>how do you keep it interesting?
Set some norms or limits on what you can do

It can be anything: a focal lens, some time of the day, using tripod only, only shooting red things from afar with a macro lens at midday...

dont do the thing nobody ever thought not doing
>>
>>4235107
Set up challenges
Pretend your canera is busted and can't adjust the aperture for the whole day for example
>>
>>4234613
start a project like shit of the day
document 365 of your bowel movements from the same angle and present them as a series.
you can get wild with and see what curry and taco bell affect your work.
>>
Seconding project. It's the only way and there are endless possibilities.

Find something that interests you, that can be documented photographically or staged, and figure out a way to share it with others: either in space, in a book, on the internet, or whatever.
You can do anything. You could:
>photograph a room over and over again from all 4 corners to the center.
>document clouds
>research dinosaurs
>retell the /p/ experience photographically
>set fire and document the consequences
>be friends with the crows
>document someone's work
>search something

Look at contemporary photo book publishers and note the projects and approaches you like. Don't waste your time on trivialities, you can spend all your free time on photography if you want.

File: s-l640.jpg (43 KB, 640x640)
43 KB
43 KB JPG
Is it worth the hype? Thinking about picking one of these up for 1k. I have a Canon R5, but I want something portable and unassuming to always have on me for documenting daily life with my family.
7 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4233891
$966 USD, specifically. I can't find anything cheaper, unfortunately.
>>4233850
Phone camera pics look a bit muddy with all the computational photography and small sensors. Seems like a huge compromise coming from DSLR/Mirrorless.
>>4233824
>>4233981
40mm seems a bit tight, but I'll check it out more.
>>
>>4233985
I liked my griii a lot. really nice camera, built quality and menue wise and also the operational quality. Same with the filters... just solid.
Only let down for me was the missing view finder. I just can't get happy with just a display. The optical I never tried, because I won't pay 300€ for a tiny piece of glas and plastic.
Other than that it's great and sometimes I miss it
>>
>>4233819
it's really nice on days when you really want something portable. But those aren't most days for me so I sold mine. Phone is good enough for "those days"
>>
>>4233991
Try the TTartisans 28mm VF. No brightlines but close enough for rough framing. $40. The Nikon NH-VF28 is the nicest VF I've used for a GR. It's perfect. You can find them for around $160.

I keep buying and selling GRs... I've had the 1 and 2, now the 3. Way back in the day I had the teensy sensor GR Digital II or III, I forget which.
>>


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 80D
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Exposure Time1/160 sec
F-Numberf/10.0
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/10.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length100.00 mm
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual

I need a new monitor, what should I buy?

Previously I had a VA Ezio which was perfect, you put that thing in sRGB mode and it is (was) perfect, prints will be what you see on your monitor, plus it had an app that automagically changed profile of your monitor depending on the program you were using (like, you bring notepad on front and it will switch to text mode - provided you assigned that mode to that program, you can do whatever you want).
So it would be nice to have these 2 things again...
12 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4233179
Do the Ayylienware AW2724DM have a txt mode?
>>
>>4233179
I bought a phillips 27e1n8900, and I love it. I would highly recommend it if you have the budget. It has an sRGB mode but akaik it doesn't have the capability to change the profile based on the program.
>>
>>4233312
I have mixed feelings about the Asus stuff…
Currently driving the PA32UCG-K and while the colour accuracy is great, the look and build is solid, there are some minor nuances but the biggest gripe I have is the wake from sleep… if it does wake, you have to furiously wiggle the mouse into it wakes up, can take up to 30 seconds, or if it doesn’t, you have to reboot the monitor.

I experienced similar on an older gaming monitor several years ago too.
>>
check out pcmonitors.info for recommendations. I've always used them to decide and it's always worked out for me. barring that, going with a Dell Ultrasharp in whatever resolution and size you want is probably a safe choice. for photo editing, search for a high percentage of sRGB coverage and ideally some sort of sRGB display mode for convenience.
>>
>>4233179
probably a fucking eizo.

File: DSC_0195.jpg (1.05 MB, 667x1000)
1.05 MB
1.05 MB JPG
Recently visited Japan.
99 replies and 60 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4233090
OP of the first photo, and I agree the second one is comfier. I don't think there's a "better" way to take a photo and every different photo here is gonna capture the photographer's emotions, which will be different. I wasn't thinking of coziness, but rather the dramatic neon cityscape that Shinjuku is. To the second photographer, keep it up man, I enjoy your take on the scene just as much as my own!
>>
File: 1695528432216690.jpg (3.01 MB, 2625x1750)
3.01 MB
3.01 MB JPG
>>4233042
This is as turbofucked as I could bring myself to make yours
>>4226058
>>>>"photography"
>>
>>4221433
>>
>>4225844
nice
>>
>>4230953
whats causing the darkness around the edges of the tower? is it cursed?

Cheap gearfag deals with only products under $60. Bundled deals like a camera and lens for under $120 counts. The NX doesn't have any lens for cheap unless they're bundled unfortunately so I'm using a cheap vintage lens I adapted.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width634
Image Height565
41 replies and 4 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
There's a million nifty fifties for this kind of money, but if you want anything wide or tele it's a lot harder.
But I do have a 135mm Jupiter that I bought for $35 that served me well before moving to a modern equivalent.
>>
>>4226530
MN? Probably the cities, am i right?
>>
>>4226048
>not just shooting RAW
Your CF card is not going to make it.
>>
Bump
>>
>>4225376

Just got back into photography I use an X-T5
I've been stopping by my local pawn shops for stuff to use or resell for funds for equipment that I can use
so far I've found
>>35mm Nikon DX 1.8 for 40$ (sold on eBay for 95$
>>fuji 35mm WR 2.0 lens for 120$
>>Canon STM 55 in box for 60$
>>Fuji 55-200 XT for 80$
>>Canon 50mm STM for 30$
>>Sony a6300 with a 50mm 1.8 FE, and 16mm 2.8 lens for 350$
>>Canon RP with adapter, 75-300 lens for 500$
>>Rebel 6i with a Tamron 17-50 2.8 zoom for 220$

Instagram is nothing but the low resolution photo cope for pseudo photographers, you can't call yourself a photographer if you use Instagram only. Maybe you're a content maker, but not a photographer, because if you make lowres photos then you're creting content, not a photography. Photography is the highres files able to be printed (or film rolls). Shooting with a cheap camera and posting on Instagram is just a cope. You don't post your highres images, exactly because you know that your kit lens can't produce anything worthy. And even if you'r know how to get a pro quality from a kit lenses (which is real), you'd still have lack of skill, of taste and of experience, that's why you don't post highres. If you don't have an archive with high resolution version of photos then you're not a photographer and if you don't have a place online where your achive is posted - then you can't call yourself a pro. I will consider you a photographer only if you have a personal website or an account of flickr, behance, 500px or any other other high resolution photography platform. I will not check your instagram page even if you will post it. I don't care. Go make efforts to create something being worthy posted in 2000+ resolution or don't even talk to me.
109 replies and 8 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4226293
i dont care about the opinions of phone-onlies unless they have had their name in a credits roll

in that case every website has a mobile view
>>
File: PSX_20230928_140733.jpg (420 KB, 1469x1923)
420 KB
420 KB JPG
Instagram is also dead because of trash men like this invading it.
>>
>>4234823
Those people are everywhere because they are right. It’s also your fault if you get robbed after leaving everything unlocked in detroit. You share a world with “people” that have less self control than the dumbest pitbull dog and more evil in them than an angry chimp. Wishing they would do better is like blaming a seagull for shitting on your head when you should have worn a hat.

Feel entitled when you advocate for fixing their disorder or removing them from society. There is no fix for psychopathy and low IQ scores, so…
>>
>>4234837
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/952615/
Rapists are literally the dumbest criminals. View them more like animals and you’ll arrive at a sensible working worldview.
>>
>>4234839
Humans are animals...

File: P9148755.jpg (812 KB, 3310x4413)
812 KB
812 KB JPG
What motivates you to take pics?

For a while I enjoyed taking pics even tho I wasnt very good at it. At one firday night at 3am I realized that it wasnt for me so I sold all my photo gear. Recently just purchased another just so I can have another shot at it. For the first like 2 shoots it was good again, I felt like I was curious again of finding new stuff and new ways. Took my friend out for a shoot a few days ago and I can already feel the same feelings creeping in... What is this? The idea of taking pics and having an unique perspective still gets me going but in the end I feel like its just pointless to take pics.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeOLYMPUS CORPORATION
Camera ModelE-M10MarkII
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.2 (Windows)
PhotographerTugyi Karoly
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8
Color Filter Array Pattern886
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)90 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2023:09:15 19:04:22
Exposure Time1/125 sec
F-Numberf/2.0
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/2.0
Exposure Bias-0.7 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Auto
Focal Length45.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlLow Gain Up
ContrastSoft
SaturationLow
SharpnessSoft
60 replies and 17 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4234131
Based, I see you're following the teachings of our master Nolan
>>
>>4234132
When was Nolan ever afraid of dementia?
>>
>>4234137
>he doesn't remember
Oh no it's starting
>>
>>4234137
Here's a Nolan quote for you:
>Building a dream from your memory is the easiest way of losing your grasp on what’s real and what is a dream.
>>
File: P1018955.jpg (1.26 MB, 1500x2000)
1.26 MB
1.26 MB JPG
Turns out quality gets p fucked up if i dont resize the pic and oversharpen.

>>4231018
I usually do this, but i crave more. Dont want to do shitty social media tho.

>>4232009
Ehh doesnt motivate me. Also what bothers me is that everyone literally photoshops the shit out of every shot, like changing reflections and removing objects and stuff.

>>4232031
How do I take it this seriously without doing it for a living?

>>4233635
I was actually pretty close with this girl but drifted away. She began drinking and smoking heavily also every time we met she literally talked about the past, nostalgia and sad shit. We talk like 3 months and even thats draining sometimes.

>>4234131

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

File: Nikon Plena 135mm f1.8.jpg (326 KB, 1240x680)
326 KB
326 KB JPG
Finally... After almost a decade, Nikon has started to make Zeiss and Leica tier lenses once again... As someone who is invested into both Nikon and Hasselblad, I hope Nikon keeps this up, otherwise I will have no choice but to consider Sony or Canon for my secondary system - and I do not like the sound of that idea whatsoever.

What are your thoughts on this lens, future lenses like this one and the future of Nikon?
>>
>>4234720
>makes the sharpest lenses ever
>puts tiffen glimmerglass infront of it

sharpeness is overhypened. as long as the bokeh falloff looks good thats all i carea bout.
>>
>>4234728
also I own the sigma 135mm f/1.8 version where an ftz adapter lives on, i dont see the need to get this one, other than maybe weight. but even if i could get 1k for my sigma i still have to find another 1.2k to pay for this 1kg lens.
>>
If this pushes down the stupid high price of the 105/1.4e then great. 135mm is too long half the the time.

File: c7c (2).png (98 KB, 612x491)
98 KB
98 KB PNG
What happened to your kitlens, /p/?
17 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4227701
Turned into cats
>>
>>4227701
my xf 18-55 is a dedicated video lens, its ace
>>
>>4233903
>mistaking Ai-S for AF-S
ngmi
>>
File: t4t547.png (3.71 MB, 2016x1343)
3.71 MB
3.71 MB PNG
>>4233926
you're retarded
>>4233926
dont listen to this retard, image actually looks really fucking good, especially the color grading. looks like a shot from a movie. one of the best shots ive seen on this nophoto retard board.

>>4234060
>muh sharpness
>muh pixel peeping
whats next? youre gonna recommend us a samyang lens? sigma maybe?
sharpness isnt everything you gearfagging poorfag
learn how to art
>>
>>4234712
i was replying to >>4233944 in the first part of my reply hes the retarded one

File: DSCF1709.jpg (1.27 MB, 1500x1000)
1.27 MB
1.27 MB JPG
i've been wondering how to categorize the progression of cmos in mirrorless, starting with canon and fuji.
some boneheads say "better low light bc larger pixel pitch lol" and some say "higher resolution means obviously better in low light teehee"
what's actually correct seems to be the tuning of the sensor/pixel readout. according to photonstophotos, the best value (in my budget) cameras seems to be eos r and x-s10. even though the x-s10 sensor is bsi and newer than the 30mp sensor, that old sensor captures lower light (iso can be cranked higher) with similar noise by at least 1 stop (12800 in x-s10 vs 25600 in eos r), and dynamic range is similar at 12800 in photonstophotos experiments.
my point is- cmos tech has NOT changed much since the 5d iv, probably even before that if you look at x-t2 vs x-t3/x-s10 dynamic range.
what exactly is holding up sensors/pixels reading higher dynamic range? where can i read some eli5/tldr level research?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelX-T10
Camera SoftwareCapture One 23 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)53 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Exposure Time1/1000 sec
F-Numberf/2.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating800
Lens Aperturef/2.0
Brightness4.8 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length35.00 mm
Image Width1500
Image Height1000
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
6 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4234640
i'm fine with it, but the question stands. an analogy that comes to mind is the lack of progression in solar panel tech. i'm just asking what's the technical reason, out of curiosity.
>>
>>4234642
not so much the dr, but the low light capability.
>>
>>4234642
Oh I see, I couldn't say for sure, but I think there is just no incentive to invest a lot of money into the R&D when camera sales are either stagnant or only showing slow growth. I think we're probably well into the realm of diminishing returns with the current processes and technologies used to create the sensors and you'd probably need to develop an entirely new process. You can see a similar rate of diminishing progress is computer processors which are technically very similar to camera sensors.
>>
>>4234641
fuji has worms and is soft out of the box
>>4234629
get an used Pentax
>>
light like other electromagnetic radiation is inherently noisy at low intensity and you better have a BIG PIXEL to catch it

File: The_GIMP_icon_-_gnome.svg.png (141 KB, 1024x1024)
141 KB
141 KB PNG
Is GIMP good enough for professional-tier work?
19 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>take picture in raw with dslr
>transfer from memory card to computer
>convert to jpeg
>bluetooth pic to phone
>picsart premium
>bluetooth back to computer
>change filename from "picsart23sep2023" to "straightfromraw23092023_02"
>post to /p/
>>
>>4225154
Having the word "gimp" on your CV/resume isn't the best idea.
>>
No
>>
I though GIMP was pretty cool, until I got into PS a bit more seriously.

It's like comparing a butter knife with a Swiss army knife.
>>
>>4225158
>paying for photoshop
who the fuck pays for adobe programs in 2023?! i have 2 businesses on my name, for 11 years now and i have never given money to a scam company such as adobe, microsoft and the likes... youd have to be retarded to give them a single penny. my former boss, who owned a 1,500+ employee business/factory and rolled 50-70M euro net profit every single year, had pirated windows on all of the PCs.

only an idiot would give money to companies like those

File: 1689644049164455.png (1.49 MB, 1280x720)
1.49 MB
1.49 MB PNG
I wish I could switch from sony to nikon but I can't afford it. Lightroom can't into sony but I can't into C1. If only I could have C1 raw processor in LrC it would be perfect, but now everything is terrible.
84 replies and 9 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4234659
I'm starting to think your website there is bs, is there any info on their methodology?
Lenstip and OL attest the snoy a 5ish ev vignetting at least, and I found no other source that gave the canon more than 2.5ev
>>
>>4234671
lenstip measured -2.5 in the corners at 24mm f4, exactly in line with TDP's results.
https://www.lenstip.com/642.8-Lens_review-Sony_FE_24-105_mm_f_4_G_OSS_Vignetting.html

optical limits disables not just vignette correction, but the distortion correction too, ie, it's meaningless, you're always going to use distortion correction, and that -5 is compared to canon's -12 in this situation.
>>
>>4229479
lol stillplebs say the dumbest shit
just more proof that cinema is the pinnacle of photography
>>
>>4234679
>comparing it against the $400 lens again
s.m.h
>>
>>4233848
probably because you were told by /p/ shills that DSLRs aren't socially acceptable


[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.