>>4303989
cANON pls, it's not the first picture of that type you have posted
just admit you got caught and we can forget this ever happened

>>4303938
I put every single photo I’ve ever shot into one folder

>>4304004
Uh, that’s you. cANON is the one with hairy negatives. Get it right.

>>4303953
Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery (that mediocrity can pay to greatness).
>>4303982
Rent free
>>4304046
No I'm not, I'm the guy with the b&w boatpix.

>>4304051
>Imitation
Now for the reveal

I took that photo to send to my mom

>sarabande
OP are you from Espana?

test

>>4296973
>He'll just say he identifies as a female.
I didn't think about that, but this might actually work

Why everyone is shitting on OP pics? they are nice, if you wanna talk ahit you must attach your pics next to your comment faggot.

>>4303887
Nobody here actually owns cameras or takes pictures. Just like how nobody on /k/ actually owns guns and nobody on /o/ actually drives. We all just sit around and argue about them.

>tricks that will help
Spacewalk into tre flip

>>4299193
expose for the shadows
develop for the highlights

File: images (6).jpg (5 KB, 280x180)

5 KB JPG

>>4299193
Read cinematography books and acquire a wealth of ideas.
One shot per scene doesn't seem like a good idea, any given amount is a bad idea IMO. If anything learn to previsualize so you can get worthy photos.

>>4299193
1 shot per scene is the opposite of what you should do

Bracket, OVFs are too low res, EVFs need too much zoomy scrolly. Most good photographers bracketed and worked their negatives in the darkroom and now they edit their raws, same shit. Ansel adams left behind hundreds of practice negs, most street photographers left behind thousands of unused photos.

You're conflating photography with marksmanship - one shot one kill.

File: IMG_1940.jpg (216 KB, 1600x840)

216 KB JPG

>>4303943
>conflating with marksmanship
What, you don’t take your fotosnaiper out on your photo walks? U gay or sumthin?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1600
Image Height	840
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: 2024-04-08-0008.jpg (918 KB, 3631x2487)

918 KB JPG

more film fumography

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Minolta
Camera Model	Scan Dual II
Camera Software	darktable 4.4.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:08 15:56:49
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3631
Image Height	2487

File: P3261015.jpg (1.7 MB, 3648x2736)

1.7 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.
Camera Model	E-510
Camera Software	Version 1.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Left-Hand, Bottom
Horizontal Resolution	314 dpi
Vertical Resolution	314 dpi
Image Created	2024:03:26 16:25:32
Exposure Time	1/25 sec
F-Number	f/4.5
Exposure Program	Creative
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Auto
Focal Length	64.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3648
Image Height	2736
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Portrait
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	High
Sharpness	Soft

File: 000065.jpg (3.42 MB, 4535x3035)

3.42 MB JPG

Fujicolor Cirno

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. FE FDi Service Software / FRONTIER355/375-3.0-0E-490
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:10 00:21:00
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4535
Image Height	3035

File: DSC00055.jpg (4.21 MB, 3648x5472)

4.21 MB JPG

can I join the Fumo /p/ club as an absolute novice and without an actual Fumo?

>>4303934
Do you use image editing/camera management software? I did use a user script for quick compression on the reply window, I didn't knew it strips all metadata from the images

>>4295676
most of these "people" barely deserve to be called human. The right thing to do would be to incinerate them but since we live in a society all I can tell you is to ignore them like you would insects

>>4295609
They don't know it's rude.

>>4295609
its like all those chumps staring at things through their phone instead of enjoying life

>>4295609
Probably because youre a gwc photographing tourist attractions

>>4299037
awesome
post one of those pics please

File: _DSC6287.jpg (1.42 MB, 2415x1610)

1.42 MB JPG

Bunker edition

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7000
Camera Software	ViewNX 2.8 W
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	26880
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	315 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:13 17:40:00
White Point Chromaticity	0.3
Exposure Time	1/1600 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	-1/3 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	210.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	3449
Image Height	2299
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: _DSC6305.jpg (1.46 MB, 4742x3140)

1.46 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7000
Camera Software	ViewNX 2.8 W
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	26880
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	105 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:13 17:40:31
White Point Chromaticity	0.3
Exposure Time	1/640 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	-1/3 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	70.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	4742
Image Height	3140
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: _DSC6232.jpg (1.59 MB, 2721x1814)

1.59 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7000
Camera Software	ViewNX 2.8 W
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	26880
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	315 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:13 17:39:08
White Point Chromaticity	0.3
Exposure Time	1/800 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	-1/3 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	210.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	3886
Image Height	2591
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: _DSC6280.jpg (2.15 MB, 3279x2172)

2.15 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7000
Camera Software	ViewNX 2.8 W
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	26880
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	315 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:13 17:39:45
White Point Chromaticity	0.3
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/11.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	-1/3 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	210.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	4684
Image Height	3102
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: _DSC6234.jpg (537 KB, 1732x1155)

537 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7000
Camera Software	ViewNX 2.8 W
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	26880
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	315 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:13 17:39:30
White Point Chromaticity	0.3
Exposure Time	1/1600 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	-1/3 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	210.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1732
Image Height	1155
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>4300020

If you're looking at the out-of-focus horizon and not the subject then you're probably gay and like to suck dicks.

>>4300149
no one cares about the tattooed mulatto whore you incel

>>4300216
>mulatto
zambo

>>4297430
>that FOV
>35mm
sure thing brah

>>4297433
Average London apartment

>>4297588
>>4297599
>thread with two photos of shitty looking basement
wowzers this is like that tiktok/roblox/trend for 12 year olds. so liminal bros ...

>>4297599
it actually means occupying a transitory phase to am unknown end. As in, your noun has an indeterminate future - and it can mean emotionally as well. it's not twisted at all, and the word is closely associated with death.

Just looks ugly and meaningless to me.

File: 1619942274696.jpg (95 KB, 848x525)

95 KB JPG

I dunno but here's an abandoned arcade

>>4292823
>>4297588
>>4303657
Idk, memorycore

>>4297287
actual reply: no, it's basically just an EM5.3 refresh but they didn't even add a 'mark' at the end like the OM1 mark II. iirc the one new thing it has is handheld high res mode but i don't know how well it actually works in practice
both are plastic-fantastics compared to the steel brick of the EM5.2, but the 5.3 and OM5 also have a better sensor and PDAF instead of the older noisier one on the 5.2 that only has contrast detection AF and constant-AF that's basically useless so if you can deal with a flimsier feeling body and possibly breaking the tripod mount, the 5.3 or newer is better, but the 5.3 is also 'good enough' and the OM5 is way too fucking expensive new for what it is

>>4299977
If I drop it would you die?

>>4299984
I pray the OM-5.2 will be metal, though I know it won't be. That with better bird AF, the 12-45/4 is basically my dream. While I'm at it, a pro 70-300 or 50-200 would be nice too.

>>4294290
up

up

>>4303594
>It can only aggregate things that are already created
That's literally photography.

>>4303578

AI image generation has already peaked. Remember all those articles when it was winning all these competitions, have not heard one of them for months lol.

Even across all the other 4chan boards, I see less and less people posting those types of images everyday.

Its over, its still way off matching photography and its unlikely it can ever get much better than it is as what that prompt really means is create an average image of every image of a chair in a well/water you have in your database.

You have so little control, you are just at the mercy of whatever that is. Also that system almost always has nonsensical parts in the image.

I have absolutely zero expectation of AI replacing photography now and have forgotten all about ai image making.

>>4303578
>>4303611
This is the truth. LLM's are a huge leap from an academic standpoint, and the fact they were conversational and effective unlike prior attempts such as Siri, Cortana, etc was stunning.

However, we're now in the deflation part of the hype cycle, and what we're seeing is the model of AI that more sober minded folks were talking about when LLM's debuted:
- A more effective version of existing 'intelligent assistants' like Siri
- Potential automation of bio robot jobs (think Indian Call Centers, etc)
- A useful tool for fuzzy matching, deployment of non-customized ML analytics, etc (think basic sentiment analysis, classifiers, etc)
- A useful search/exploratory mechanism for complex technical documentation (LLM's are really good at generating SQL and other scripting type languages)

They're big deal, but not in the way the average plebiscite thinks they are.

>>4303615

I don’t even think it will ever be able to do Indian call centre jobs. There is just always risk it starts saying the wrong thing and making the company liable for millions in damages. Even if it’s worked fine for months you have zero certainty it won’t start making errors at any point in time. It could also only give the average answer the last 50-100 or whatever calls said on the topic, good luck with all the minor contributing details that will be different every time.
I see it more likely as a tool 3 Indians using ai assistance to kind of search possible answers while the call is happening can prob equal what 4 Indians could do without the ai. Ie a small reduction in staff from people using ai as an assistant but everything always needing human review.
It’s prob only useful to photographers as an assistant who can write first drafts or marketing content or draft emails to clients that will still need review etc.

It has no awareness or understanding of anything, it’s just useful to give an approximate starting point for human review.

Also why the image side is useless for photography, a first draft of a photo isn’t an email you can easily edit, it’s a not quite photo quality image you have no way to fix into a photo.

>deep cobblestone well
>every image is like 6" deep
>>4303647
If they cared about customer service they wouldn't have shipped those call centers to india in the first place. If AI can do even 10% as good a job for cheaper they will absolutely do that. And when it gets it wrong there will be nobody to complain to.

computer

Good morning sar

>>4303613
it's the bit rate of the recording.

>>4303637
this. 100 mb/s vs 24 mb/s

File: 7Q0A6911-2.jpg (3.48 MB, 4480x6720)

3.48 MB JPG

>>4303250
>>4303238
got around to finishing a mounting print and throwing a magic arm on the thing and it was actually quite smooth. was able to shoot a full 2:1 on a 6x8 negative fairly painlessly lol. one thing i discovered is that as sturdy as magic arms can be, the single small mounting point makes them whole thing susceptible to the camera's moment of inertia. gotta find a sturdier way. it just meant waiting 3-4 seconds for the thing to stop wobbling and using a remote trigger. with some more refinement it might be a pretty wicked way to scan things, if tedious.
problem is it seems i hit those diminishing returns. and an unexpected issue is the workflow for processing 32+ images. Photoshop twisted itself into knots merging it and took forever. and doing any editing or work at all dragged, and died trying to export. affinity photo did a merge quite impressively quickly, but it is locked into some kind of spherical projection for its panorama merge which is useless. seems aside from fun experiment, not really worth the trouble.
>>4303575
picrel one chunk of image compared to the full thing.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS R
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:11 23:07:11
Exposure Time	1.6 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Unique Image ID	A4E23521918A58A3DEFB6F9562DFE8FA

>>4303417


>>4302986
>large and/or hires, finding that threshold so your film grain doesnt look like square pixels is important.

Hey ken rockwell, go ahead and scan your crappy snapshits of your suburb or your fat kid in your crappy 12mp jpg. Save en as 8bit too, bc you cant see that difference either. Its really cool that you have no idea the difference between an archival scan and whatever crap you think is “good enough” for your snapshits, but the thread full of people building rigs for archival scanning is not going to be the target audience for your worn-out shtick.

>>4301075
When you build that time machine let me know so i can go back in time and give my photographer grandfather this z7 before he shot 50 years of work. It’ll make my life 1000x easier.
>just choose one or the other, i cant handle two kinds of cameras existing, one must be superior
No, the kind of aspie nerds that fill the internet think photography is about the gear. They are fucking hopeless & need to imagine everything is a black & white, all-or-nothing binary choice. These people are idiots. The world didn't stop painting landscapes just because the Sony A7ivxrS3 shoots it at 600megapixels. Dont be so fucking german.

>>4303591
Neat. Are you controlling it just with gcode over serial? I am curious what the accuracy/repeatability of the positioning is. Best case is it would be accurate enough that the images would just line up and you could combine them with an imagemagick script or somesuch. I doubt it is that accurate but maybe good enough to use something less computationally intensive than full pano stitching.
With gcode scripting + tethering + automatic stitching it shouldn't matter so much how tedious it is, 'cause you'd just kick it off and go shitpost for a while like you'd do with an old fashioned scanner.

>>4303631
I used commands over serial with pronterface for this. It has manual controls that can override the end stops in the firmware and I couldn’t figure out which g codes do that. I ripped the tool head off and this printer had 2/3 homing end stops on the tool head so I couldn’t use typical g-code cause it can’t home lol. I feel like with a solid sturdy mount, it would be fairly repeatable, it’s on a sturdy linear rail and the steppers resolve to like 0.1mm or something like that. I think it would be more useful for 4x5 or larger formats maybe. Even at 1:1 would still take a few shots.

>>4303449
For me, I need the weather / dusk sealing. I do not use the tripod often for my shooting, so the IBIS is welcome. The high MP count should be helped with clarity with IBIS on. I haven't actually ever turned off the IBIS, so I wouldn't know how much it truly helps.

File: noise.jpg (3.29 MB, 3513x2289)

3.29 MB JPG

>>4303454
The images seem really noisy, it could be my lack of competence tho

1600iso, f/2.8, 1/40 sec, 40mm, no flash

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop 21.0 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:11 21:20:02
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	3513
Image Height	2289

>>4303465
Try turning sharpening off by default. It can make noise much worse. You will always get some degree of noise like this at higher ISO.
If you have some automatic light leveling on, it might make it more pronounced as well.

File: IMG_20200720_225115.jpg (129 KB, 2027x1470)

129 KB JPG

>>4299761
>Smartphones can even be used for astro when used right.
lol true here's one I took holding my phone against a guard rail. it was like a 40s exposure or something

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Google
Image-Specific Properties:

>>4299862
Least delusional iToddler

>>4303524
Being thrifty is the opposite of a poverty cult, consooming in excess is how you remain poorfag

>>4303539
>I never made it from $50k a year to $50 mil because I spent $1000 more on a camera
I suppose, if your strategy for getting rich was throwing almost all of your money at a desperate bid for a 100x ie: options, crypto, leverage.

For the rest of us, it's a minor expense, and the nicer your camera is, the more competitive it will remain for the forseeable future, ie: no one will say "looks like a phone" for at least 20 years. The fuckin 5diii still looks like a hasselblad next to phones, it's just a big clunky POS.

>>4303539
there's being thrifty like "r5? got my 5dsr for a song, son!" and then there's "just dont expect anything nice, you shouldnt ever want nice things, you're doing something wrong, you dont NEED...blablabla buy this 12mp sony"

>>4303543
One frivolous expense and another and another all add up to the poorfag's perpetual credit card debt.
Have some Sam antics
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4lraYMtzz4
>>4303545
Fair enough

>>4303580
>taking hyperbolic financial advice from a neckbeard
your life will not end because you bought a nicer camera

>>4290840
Smoker of what? Crack? Jesus Christ.

>>4291295
good post anon, thank you

>>4293034
Like her nails. they are such a nice detail

>>4290115
man, I love Chicago. super biased but the set was awesome.

>>4290328
ghastly brie