Self-serve ads are available again! Check out our new advertising page here.
what will be some history defining pictures from 2020? Like pictures of the BLM protests, capitol hill protest, covid shit, and Beirut explosion. Almost like how picture related represents the Tiananmen Square Massacre.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareGoogleImage-Specific Properties:Image Width1024Image Height686
>>3877456I guarantee you, whether you like it or not, this will be THE de facto picture used in history textbooks when they talk about Trump's foreign policy.
>>3879002Oh shit, I'm a dummy and jumped to quickly, this isn't a 2020 photo lol. But still, this shit is going to happen and you fucking know it.
>>3879002>Trump's foreign policy2016-2020: MAGA AMURICA FIRST!also 2016-2020: wait why did chy-na fill the void we created? :((( chy-na bad!
>>3879019swawell's gf
>>3879002this is the correct answer
So I decided to get an xt-4 Now I have to choose between the 18-55 2.8-4 or the 16-80 4 I plan mostly on landscape photography especially on 3-5 day backpacking trips. So weight is a factor but not a major one. What I care about most is image quality. Id gladly take image quality over weight or AF speed.
>>3878902But it's still useful to suggest it to people because there are lots of people who have never even considered buying a used previous generation camera. Especially with the X-T3 vs the X-T4, where the differences are relatively minor and the price savings are huge, it makes sense to try to help someone make a good decision even if they didn't explicitly ask you to do that. You have to realize you open a discussion. This isn't Yahoo Answers where you can just pop in a question and get a direct response and that's it, no other discussion allowed.
>>3878903xt-3 vs xt-4 is a whole other conversation and it's not clearcut at all. There are a lot of it depends factors there.
>>3878906I agree with that, I'm coming here for your knowledge so if theres an answer that I'm not seeing by all means suggest it but I think if ur gonna suggest something that wasnt originally asked you shouldnt just insult me Call me a mongoloid because I'm not getting a prime lens.
>>3878914Yeah, I forgot that the price difference is quite substantial right now. And then you need to add charger and extra battery for xt4. Are there even any third party batteries already available for xt4?
>>3878314nice picture
>Sony discontinues its last DSLRsAnd nothing of value was lost.
>>3877503shit i was hoping to buy the new α999abcIVdef A-Mount SLT camera for my pictures of pop stars on tour this year
>>3877543Pentax makes nice cameras. Your favorite youtuber or IG influencers don't get paid to use them so you wouldn't know. Cunt.
I still remember when I started photography, slt are being shilled so much. So many people's from photo club switching gear to slt.
>>3877926>pellicle prisms are not mirrors anonIt’s a mirror, not a prism. >>3877975>If it doesn't have an optical viewfinder it's not a reflex.Debatable, but a much more valid argument than the other guy’s and I don’t actually care enough to debate it, so sure. They definitely don’t count as mirrorless, though, which was my main point. There’s a big ‘ol mirror right there in the optical path just like a standard SLR.
The a99ii is an excellent camera.
i just made this:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kijGMvSWoDAthoughts?
all hollywood celebs should die
>>3877009based and pogrompilled
>>3876778Good shit >No commentary or criticism Disappointed
>>3877009normies are sheeple/blame the g0v
>>3876844how rude
Soviet Era CamerasAnyone have experience shooting with these cameras?
No but thanks for asking.>a gear thread died for this
Not that specific one, but I’ve got a Kiev 6C that I like a lot.
uuhhmmbbvvvvvvjsshhh
>>3878799good
how do mirrorless fags cope with the fact that they can't be this comfy with manual lens
>>3878722Nikon f3 my man
ITT: Cope from both sides
>>3877628By owning more than one camera.
>>3878464>>3878468Thanks a lot, yeah the one i was looking for is a diagonal split for an old Canon.>>3878513>split image >micro prismI think it has both.
>>3877898DSLR>optical viewfinder without focusing patch>all photos are slightly out of focusmeanwhile with a mirrorless>focus peaking for fast shots>zoom focus for precise shots>photos are even sharper than with a focusing patch
say I have a regular digital camera on a normal tripod, can I get something that looks like pic related that hooks into it via usb and I can take snapshots with my thumb, like press it like a button instead of having to press the button on the camera??
>>3873245just use the timer
>>3877344just get someone else to do photography for you, what are you poor?>>3877344>>3877344>>3877344
Just stop taking photographs, what are you poor?
>>3873245The camera might even have an app so you can trigger it with your phone
Nikon has this IR remote that's dirt cheap, for this purpose. Receiver on the front and back of the camera, pretty nice for group self pictures.
Gearfags on suicide watch
>>3869247The origin story of Czech Casting Couch
>>3869247Can't get more based then that
>>3869246I wanna see him make digital cameras
>>3869909based afthe nikon of fallout world
>>3869247this is what it means to be a true artist.
>walk through the city for a couple hours>feel really weird holding a camera>glance around in different directions and around corners for compositions>probably look like a super sketchy piece of shit>feel nervous and guilty and shitty for 2 hours straight>miss a few obvious opportunities because it feels like you're a fucking faggot>take a roll of completely useless photos of nothing because they were easy to get>go home and feel like shit>consider exposing the roll to the sun to avoid having to look at it laterwhy
>>3850168Stop looking at people as people and look at them as subjects. They aren't important; they are only there for your art. Like you're on safari looking at animals. They're all normie npc's anyway.
>>3876032>normie npc's>"normie"You are as much of a NPC as them if you are scared enough not to use the real term.
A wild orc appears[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON Z 7Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 9.4 (Windows)Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern860Focal Length (35mm Equiv)220 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2021:05:06 19:46:50Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/6.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating140Lens Aperturef/6.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length220.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>3850168just shoot when you feel like shooting and don't when you don'tsimple as
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-T2Camera SoftwareCapture One 12.1.5 WindowsSensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiExposure Time0.6 secF-Numberf/1.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/1.0Brightness-4.8 EVExposure Bias-0.7 EVMetering ModeSpotLight SourceDaylightFlashNo FlashFocal Length50.00 mmImage Width2000Image Height2000RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
ITT, you post pictures taken with shitty digicams.Everything still matters like composition and lighting, but you have to use the shittiest digital compact you have, bonus points if you don't have to resize to get under 1000px longest side. Digital artifacts are not only welcomed, they are encouraged. OP picture has two dead pixels.All gear discussion ITT should be about finding the shittiest gear and shooting with it.
>>3853248nice tru-specs bro
>>3877448I don't mind a 'slow' camera (for my type of photography) but I get your point.
Fujifilm FinePix J20
>>3878289very nice
>>3878770Thanks.
>>>/xs/41689
>>3878509This isn't my thread, but there are more in the /fgt/ thread>>3878518Thanks
>>3877082>>3877083>>3877097>>3877135>>3877273>>3877700cry more children also samefag
>>3878660"Its one guy"
>>3877125damn thanks for the explanation anon.
>>3878540I saw them, they’re reel neeto
Name the most ergonomic and intuitive camera to grace your touch.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1400Image Height788Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>3878545lmao compared to what other 67 slr anon?
>>3877666Take a photo with your phone using just one finger and your thumb, it's nigh on impossible.
>>3878579its impossible on an actual camera too lmao
>>3871789I've never tried the K-1 but, I love my K-3
>>3878552i mean like, it's got great ergonomics in spite of being a 6x7 SLR
Sorry for bad english. I noticed many stock photos are both on Shutterstock and on Freepik. They are the same resolution and size, but they cost 50+USD on the former and are free (with attribution) on the latter. I checked and they were uploaded by same studio/artist so no theft/scam.How is that possible? How does it work?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution71 dpiVertical Resolution71 dpiColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1500Image Height1101
>>3878690oh i see.. probably some sort of botnet/data mining, you're paying indirectly with your info and traffic rather than directly
>>3878697>you're paying indirectly with your info and traffic rather than directlynut i'm paying the website not the photographer.My original questio - jesus christ - is why would an artist offer their photos free
>>3878698the website pays the artist per download like a few cents, where as shutterstock pays the artist also only a few cents per sale, so really the free option gives the artist a better chance at matter a few cents because people are more likely to download the "Free" version
>>3878699I understand now, thanks. It wasn't that difficult, was it... jesus
>>3878687 read >>3878668 again. Slowly. >He probably uses both just to showcase his work.Selling images on shutterstock is not a priority for many that are there. It can be used to advertise own work.
Heyo, I didn't shoot that much during the winter but I'm back at it with some pictures[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePanasonicCamera ModelDC-S1Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.2 (Windows)PhotographerMARTIN BARONMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.2Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)35 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:04:19 20:09:17Exposure Time1/1000 secF-Numberf/3.2Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/3.2Exposure Bias-0.3 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length35.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastSoftSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>3867268>>3867398>>3873977Anon these are lovely
>>3874398You seem to love pink ones![EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePanasonicCamera ModelDC-S1Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.2 (Windows)PhotographerMARTIN BARONMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.2Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)37 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:04:29 21:42:24Exposure Time1/6400 secF-Numberf/1.2Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/1.2Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length35.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastSoftSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePanasonicCamera ModelDC-S1Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.2 (Windows)PhotographerMARTIN BARONMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.2Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)37 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:04:29 21:42:22Exposure Time1/1600 secF-Numberf/1.2Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/1.2Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length35.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastSoftSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
around where were these taken, OP?
>>3878548Eastern France, the first batch is from an oriental park
Coolpix P1000 is the undisputed consumer creepshot king
>>3875836This should suit you OP.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width678Image Height452Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>3875836The one u have build into a mirrow that you gift away
>>3876300baste
Don't remember the name but there was a small white clip on camera that looked like one of those ipod shuffle devices. That was years ago but I suppose quality on newer minicams are much better today. The ones that looked like bluetooth earpieces were an option too
