>>3768679
>Its obviously possible but will canon release an attachable cooling grip or release a revised unit anytime soon?

They obviously won't release anything like that. New models will probably even come up with this exploit patched. They don't want to compete with their c70, c500, c700 lineup. But it may make R5's the best hacked 8k you can get for a long time.

>>3768594
>2 years
>$16
Nice. That's more success than 99% of photographers.

>>3768594
why haven't you optimised your discoverability anon?

>>3768594
Look on the bright side. If you were on Shitterstock you need about 30 sales to make $16

File: 65844014.jpg (165 KB, 1202x800)

165 KB JPG

>>3768667

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Leica Camera AG
Camera Model	M9 Digital Camera
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh) (Adobe Photoshop CS6
Photographer	Simon Chang
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1600
Image Height	1065
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2020:11:24 19:21:17
Exposure Time	1/1500 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0.3 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	24.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1202
Image Height	800
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Unique Image ID	00000000000000000000000000018E18

File: 65844017.jpg (116 KB, 1202x800)

116 KB JPG

>>3768668

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh) (Adobe Photoshop CS6
Photographer	Simon Chang
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1600
Image Height	1065
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2020:11:24 19:20:28
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1202
Image Height	800

File: 65844012.jpg (181 KB, 1202x800)

181 KB JPG

>>3768669

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh) (Adobe Photoshop CS6
Photographer	Simon Chang
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5212
Image Height	3468
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2020:11:24 19:20:03
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1202
Image Height	800

BW on film. Last claimed to be unintentional double exposure.

Is this stuff art?

File: sd1.jpg (123 KB, 1721x942)

123 KB JPG

>>3768164
Alternating between these four.

File: andy-warhol-marilyn-monro(...).jpg (190 KB, 600x240)

190 KB JPG

>>3768256
why not just use all of them, like in the Marilyn Monroe painting?

>>3768219
yeah, it's a fairly old photo of mine, really wasn't fluent in the rules of photography.

>>3768256
i like those, can you post one in full res

>>3768226
now that's a nice pic

>>3768411
Fuck books, just learn from your own mistakes or look up online tips just like here for example starting with me. Search composition on google, more straightforward.

"i didn't go to photography books, i went to photos" - ansel adams

>>3768411
i don't think you need books to learn photography
but sontag's "on photography" is an interesting short read

>>3768618
...because there were none. He then wrote pretty good photo books.

I've got a Olympus 35 RC and the rangefinder is now quite dim so focusing is getting harder and harder. Is it possible to make it bright again / clean it somehow or is gonna stay like that forever due to age (and yes i know about the black piece of tape in the middle of the VF).

>>3767941
Look up and see if anyone else has done it already. Probably just get the top plate off and carefully clean any mirrors/glass you find. Actually because I'm feeling like helping I found a disassembly guide for you: http://rick_oleson.tripod.com/index-134.html

>>3767989
>http://rick_oleson.tripod.com/index-134.html
yea I also know about this site. I actually just wanted to know if making the RF clear again is even possible with a camera this old or is it just something that gets fucked up with age.

>>3768090
The mirrors and optics will get grime on them for sure; assuming you can do it without breaking anything, it can't hurt.

does anyone have a picture of the circuit board/electronics that are inside RZ67 Z series lens shutters?

Photo threads to the front page.

fotothread bump

>>3755231
bamp

photos go to the front page

photo up

>>3766502
>I hope they’re still seething about it to this day
You're naive if you think they care, the receive funding to push idpol, and you're even naiver if you think about (((da joos))) when I say funding. They receive it from the rich in general, they aim to divert attention of the working class from the fact that there's more important issues than some druggie porn actor choking to death after he overdosed on fentanyl and the cops had to hold him down. Also they want to eliminate conventional masculinity because that promotes not being passive and doing something about things. Once every guy is a Cardi B worshipping basedboy that's when they won.
Here's your redpill for the day anon.

>>3766498
>this election
lmao dude pozzflix has been pozzflix for years, even before Trump was in the political arena

>>3766656
Their shows are definitely getting more and more loaded with toxic feminism though. Look at Sabrina, I watched that with my then-gf-now-ex when it came out and I had to quit after like 10 minutes when the showmakers already felt it was appropriate to make a subplot point about how "misogynistic" some principal was because he ignored that a bunch of guys tried to lift some girl's tshirt to see if she has tits because she (?) was supposed to be enby or something? Absolute bs, if you see this in a show, just quit.

mo more discussion on this? disappointing

>>3766661
I watched some series that like the town appeared to teleport onto some alien planet, forgot what it was. Dropped it at episode 2 I think it was when all the characters became mouth pieces for >muh real socialism hasn't been tried before

>>3768390
The a7iii is amazing. This was when sony hit its stride

>>3768227
So, like any other camera, you mean? haha

>>3768384
Based

>>3768407
>You will love and/or hate the camera.
Love mine for sports.
Hate I can’t do bracket exposure with 2/10sec delay. Wtf! I want the tripod to settle before it #%^£€ing shoots.

File: file.png (165 KB, 443x300)

165 KB PNG

How does the Sony - Alpha a6000 compare to the a7 or the a7iii

>>3763446
central europe = eastern europe retard

>>3766053
My man, that's showing off your powerlevel way too much for my liking ; )

File: DSC_3081.jpg (2.63 MB, 2048x1366)

2.63 MB JPG

>>3763446
This amuses me considering the absolute state of typical polish home's gas installation lmao

>>3763446
>Poland is Central Europe not Eastern Europe you fools.
I'm czech and even I have the balls to admit were eastern europe, and there's nothing wrong with it.
You're the fool here.

File: mein nigger.jpg (16 KB, 640x360)

16 KB JPG

>>3760348
>Quick glance through small town in Eastern Europe

>>3768516
Autofocus adapters for manual lenses never work well in my experience. They awkwardly move up and down to replicate "autofocus", but you'd probably be better off manually focusing with focus peaking/assist or learning how to zone focus. You'll be faster than some adapter will be.

>>3768516
Similarly to Contax AX, it has restrictions on what it can focus - the lens must focus using the entire block (so anything with floating elements/groups will have reduced IQ or won't focus at all), and since the adapter provides only a few mm of movement, focus range will be severely limited on longer lenses, requiring you to roughly prefocus manually.

>"don't use with af-s or the adapter will fry itself"
That's kinda shitty too

I've seen one in a store, it worked surprisingly fast but with limited coverage for some reason, still better than SLR focusing in terms of coverage but in terms of speed i think it's a bit under the average for mirrorless.
With very fast glass i think it's worth it because good luck focusing 1.2 shit with bad eyesight.

>>3768588
It's like 7mm of extension or something. For Tele you can prefocus the lens, actually you it means you can get min focus distance + 7mm of extension.

You could mod it or if you made one of course you could make it go a lot further. Actually you could also piggy back the signal to the motor and hook up another motor with power source to the focus ring of the lens to go further. But the adapter is too expensive for what it is

35mm film lenses look like absolute ass on mirrorless digital. Guys are paying money to have their sensors shimmed lol.

>>3767998
Image quality, size, weight, price
https://youtu.be/sdvWpkaxFcw

>>3767958
>not knowing how to compose foregrounds in landscapes
Never gonna make it kid

>>3768067
>Thinking sensorlets do use foreground elements

>>3768073
Cope

>>3768024
I watched this review and the conclusion I came to is that it has way too much CA, to the degree where I actually now think the Sony 35mm f/1.8 is a more viable option because even though that one suffers from CA issues, it's nowhere near as bad as the Samyang lens. Either way, it seems far from a great lens. A good value maybe but not a great lens.

>>3763017
this is fucking clean

>>3764266
>>>/p/dtt ?

>>3763993
This is amazing.

>>3767638
I switched to Olympus Workspace instead. Though it seems to encouter lots of "unexpected errors"

>>3762641
new York?

>>3768444
>comparing this to that abomination that is a7c
Big yikes

>>3768444
>worse than A7C

please. even sonygger shills are already pretending that that camera does not exist

>>3768457
Precisely, they're similar abominations. Except the 7C has some redeeming capabilities, but ergonomically and aesthetically it's trash.
>>3768458
Believe it or not they tried to defend it when I called it ugly in one of the gear threads.
>muh metal
>muh premium feel
They can go suck a dick lol. Unironically claiming it looked better than an EOS RP which is part of one of the best designed photo MILC lines in the market only rivaled by Nikon's Z series. They look good and they handle as well as a MILC possibly can. Still I wouldn't buy either, not when DSLRs exist. They're a step in the right direction though, away from the miniaturization obsession that is one of the causes of thermal performance being so poor in most MILCs.

my gelto diii

>>3768470
wait are you saying canon rp is one of the best designed cameras?