Self-serve ads are available again! Check out our new advertising page here.
how do I shoot a long boarding video?
>>3827590fisheye and a gimbal
>>3827592why a fisheye?
>>3827605[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera Softwarepaint.net 4.2.10Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpi
>>3827605i am not sure i have ever seen a skating video that wasn't shot with a fisheye at least in part
>>3827605You're going to be holding the camera or putting it on the board. If you want to see any of the surrounding environment, you need a fisheye.
What resolution should I take my pictures in?
>>3827031Yeah but you don’t need it
>>3826700160px is not a heckin lot to play with. I prefer to get it done in camera as much as the next guy, but I am not sure I can get behind the sentiment here. 24MP seems like an absolute bare minimum for any serious modern work. Print, web, whatever.
>>3827520You don't need pictures.
>>382753099% of clients put the photos onto their facebooks and thats it. Maybe a small print. You don’t NEED more than 12 MP
>>3826607Anything below 50MP is for plebs who know what they're doing and care about photography
Y'all finally got a brighter tilt screen, built-in ND filters, a viewfinder and better battery life. But would any of you actually buy this thing for $2495 instead of picking up a regular Pocket 6K, now that they're on sale for $1799?
>>3827003It wasn't? It's just been up for a few days.
>>3827015>>3823000
>>3827003>>3827185>hurrr if it talks about the same camera it's the same thread
>>3827212it's the same thread
>>3827214The other one is just a link, this one actually has a point,
I bought a canon 5d mk4 and a 35mm but all my pictures pretty much look shitty no matter how much tweaking I do to the settings. What am I doing wrong? Also, thanks in advance.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1920Image Height1280Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>3826579Care to be a little more specific? Post examples with full EXIF for moar help. Taht photo you posted isn't terrible. There are two ways a photo can shitty: bad IQ or bad composition. Most people will forgive poor-ish IQ for great composition (especially for grungy shots). Bad composition can't really be saved by great IQ tho.
>>3826579>I bought a canon 5d mk4 and a 35mmKen Rockwell said it best, the only gear that matters is the lighting gear. You can have the best camera ever created and if your lighting sucks your photo will suck.
>>3826628lol this./thread
>>3827622This. Think in terms of light and shadow.
>>3826628/thread
All the talk of Foveons on the board made me briefly forget what a fuckin' bitch it is to shoot with a DP2 Merrill, so I took my DP2 Merrill out for a day.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSIGMACamera ModelSIGMA DP2 MerrillMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)45 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiF-Numberf/4.5Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Shutter Speed1/1600 secExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFocal Length30.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedExposure ModeAuto
>>3824388>looks kinda 3-DMICROCOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONTRAST*goes back to the Leica thread*
>>3827614Wat
>>3827651That it looks great because of the microcontrast but it's admittedly a Leica user tier thing to say.
>>3824376such a nice shot
>>3827659Thanks! I've taken literally a million variations on it.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 5D Mark IIIMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating3200Shutter Speed1/250 secExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedExposure ModeAuto
Instagram rate thread! Have these things been banned or why isn't there one in the catalog?Anyway, to kick off the thread, I propose we do things a little differently:Each anon not only rates the others' profiles, but also recommends one indoor shooting idea and one for outdoor, based on the shooter's style.Don't be a willy - If you want feedback, you need to provide 3 positives and 3 negatives about profiles previously posted. I'll follow this rule as soon as there's replies.Bear in mind: if you use IG for anything else other than networking and having an easily accessible (albeit compressed to shit) portfolio, you're ngmi. Most of the mainstream instagram aesthetic is for vapid teens with self-image problems and McKinnon-type influencers that want to sell you their presets meant for overcooking. I'd be more than willing to be proven otherwise tho, share profiles you like as well, if you've got any.
>>3826925>Using peoples final and sacred resting place for you aesthetic. If you're in a cemetery go to pray for their souls, go to respect the dead, and not to mine their grave site for cool photos to post on /p/ and your social media feed.
stop being muppets the both of you>>3826220make your damn peace with the fact that necrophotography is at its best cheesy and at its worst sacrilegious. You're not koudelka, your highest aspiration is to get likes/followers on ig with your shots and there's nothing wrong with that but quit larping with them *muh father's restoration* excuses>>3826243wew lad don't get them catholic panties in a twist.one of the most common exercises in photography courses used to be the graveyard field trip where amateurs could practice on angles of fixed subjects with an easy but direct narrative behind them.The dead don't rest nor give two shits about your ethics, it's up to the specific cemetery regulations and most of them are fine with it if you're respectful.We can all agree that it's shitty photography but as long as you're not a sperg who takes selfies of himself twerking on the tombstone it's not all that different from monument shots.
>>3827466>common practice of faggy art school liberals is to desecrate grave sites for low quality art practice by sending people who don't respect cemeteries into themColor me surprised.
>>3827467>faggy art school liberals>low-quality art practice>people who don't respectgot any more synonyms for literally every photographer alive m8?
>>3827466bet you take photos of dead animals as well
https://petapixel.com/2021/02/22/the-used-market-the-last-bastion-for-dslrs-has-fallen-to-mirrorless/[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution144 dpiVertical Resolution144 dpiImage Width828Image Height401
>>3827297
>>3827309No meds will fix your stupidity.
>>3826633Yeah whatever helps you sleep at night.Options
I give it ten years before the gadget fetishism wears off and we get a boom in DSLR pricing as people realize that there's a ton of old gear out there that's still very competitive.
Imagine the absolute horror of a7iii used price approaching $1k mark for hobby/budget camera segment
Currently I have no workflow, I just take pictures and that's how they forever remain. I want to start cropping, rotating, scaling, and exporting images for web - no interest in playing with levels or colors. What is the absolute easiest way to do this? Free preferably. Ideally something less cumbersome than gimp.
Probably FastStone.I use it to view large folders because I hate the thumbnail lag present in windows ever since Vista came out but it has basic editing features.
>>3827626Just try not to do it. Workflow is the most boring part of photography anyway. Learn to use your bracket exposure settings and set up your camera to do JPGs at the medium size settings so they're ready for web.
Alright bros let’s see your kit.Postem[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1960Image Height1307Scene Capture TypeStandard
Left for fun, right for 'work'.>>3826924sure[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera Model--Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Express (Android)Sensing MethodUnknownImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:02:23 18:41:10Exposure Time1 secExposure ProgramNot DefinedBrightness1.6 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashColor Space InformationsRGBExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardAltitude0.00 mTime (UTC)00:00:00Date (UTC)0
>>3826917im not looking to spend a lot of money, i just want to take good looking pictures of my car when i go travellingi'd probably be buying a lens first tho, i only have a shitty little 50mm prime lens
>>3826924The LEICA MAN(TM) is always a dentist. You have to know that.Sincerely,a fellow dentist colleague
>>3827001That's a pretty x100
comfy:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdCq-1MJmHw&list=PLFnHr5CMeqHwnJ4Lq7CRn24G15du9hT3mAnyone else got interesting old photography content?
>>3824043>BBC masters
>>3825151kek
>>3825151Lol
>>3825151Forty keks
>>3825151fpbp
I just bought the Fuji XF 35mm f/1.4 and I've taken it out twice so far so I'll post my favourite photos here. I initially bought my XT-3 with a zoom lens, and I had forgotten the magic of prime lenses. I'm really enjoying the 35mm lens on my crop sensor! Feel free to comment, critique, wormpost, and post your own photos. I'm feeling inspired.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-T3Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.4Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)53 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2021:02:17 20:46:32Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/7.1Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/7.1Brightness5.9 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length35.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>3827253>he's wrong because he's calling a 35mm lens a 35mm lensI'm not sure if you're trolling or just stupid...
>>3827365Imagine using a 35mm lens then cropping 50% of it out
It's a great lens OP, it'll treat you well. Enjoy it.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-E2Camera SoftwareCapture One 21 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.4Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)53 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiExposure Time1/100 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating2000Lens Aperturef/4.0Brightness1.3 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length35.00 mmImage Width1000Image Height1500RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessHardSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>3825677>>3825675>>3825671I like it a lot
> 35mm snaps> actually 52.5mm
What is the point of a crop sensor system camera in 2021 except cutting manufacturing costs?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1000Image Height887Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>3827538Why else would you be spending your winter holidays trying to sell a feature that forces your camera to guess colours?
>>3824725Nice pencildick mount on the playstation camera lmao
>>3827541>your winter holidaysJokes on you I haven't had a day off since I started my job in september
>>3827543Well, your job is to shill online, so it's the same as having says off.
>>3827543dont you know that sony produces highest quality gear? ;^)
https://twitter.com/SonyAlpha/status/1361742687880294403https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjxqTp0emzQ
>>3822821I will never buy one of these untilA. They implement USB-C storage like the fucking blackmagic cameras instead of doing GREAT ROBBARI with those custom express cardsB. They stop locking raw and higher codecs behind a dlc paywal or they just call it a fucking day and implement Braw since its fucking free
>>3825562>using your competitor's standardThat's rarely a smart thing to do.
>>3822858>literal corp shilling>not spamalright son
damn those hook noses got to japan too?
>>3827079Sad :(
You WILL stop larping and accept the hard truth.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=38bzr0wC3UI
>>3826805>List video>Repeats the fucking title in the fucking video>14 minutes>Everything said can be summarised in 60 seconds. Fuck off and die with this time wasting bullshit.
>>3826805all true except for tripod and bag. No you don't have to buy a bag for $500.
>>3827056It's not a fuck you in my eyes.Either you are aware of all the things behind the good landscape picture or do not try it at all - it takes a lot but it is doable.
>>3827472>$500 sackHow many wide-angle lenses is he carrying around, exactly? Is he taking every lens on every trip? I am not a landscape photographer, but he made it sound like he took three lenses. Why do three lenses and a body necessitate a $500 bag? And I don't even know what tripod he is buying that costs $500. Some carbon Gitzo or something, I guess. I hope that includes the head. It's a good window into the mind of the landscape photographer youtuber anyways.
Not really seeing the 'hard truths' here>you need gearI enjoy owning gear >you won't make money easilyNo shit lol, it's photography >you won't always get good picturesThis is kind of obviousThe rest are not even worth mentioning
hardly a pocket camera
>>3827115watching black magic btfo canon and sony and nearly come close to the current kings, panasonic and fuji, has been so fucking satisfying. cant wait to see what this company comes up with next : )
>>3827347i want them so badly to put the 6k pro into a box. im tired of the pocket cinemas looking like a wonky dslr. and i hope they fix the abysmal battery life.make a cheaper option to the red komodo that doesnt look like dog ass.
>>3827347Obvious bait is obvious.
>>3827115can I use one of these for stills? looks awesome
>>3827445nothe stills function is just a frame grab with no real control over shutter speed (always dependant on project framerate, can't be longer than 360°), no possibilities to review or delete pictures unless you put the card into a computerpracitally unusable for stills
