Help me out here.How was this photo taken? Or was it just stitched together?
>>3664595noise doesn't matter and never has, its just an easy thing to address and fix and a popular snake oil criticism real patricians add grain
>>3664666That anon meant there's nothing to rest your eye on you moron. But it does work
>>3664595>noiselmao thats your takeaway from this shot
>>3664667>That anon meant there's nothing to rest your eye on you moron.if you say so, moron
>>3663969>MadskilzOn the tech drawing! Are you an architect?
I'm a n00b I just wanna thank you for your patience is this question is dumb. What kind of camera and set up does Mike Adriano use to shoot his scenes? He has a very distinct style. Example: Evil Angel
does this guy shoot porn?
>>3664670why yes, he does
>>3664670
>>3664658mr pre-cum adriano.
Is the Angry Photographer a Fuji shill or are Fuji just better cameras overall right now in comparison to competition?First he hated Canon then Sony and when he can't stop it, he turned on mfturds saying Olympus will close down and now Nikon.
>>3655554>>3655555>>3655566Glad more people see what a complete fraud this nutjob is.
>>3660544is this the power of medium format?or just fucking gearslut boomer
>>3660666Gearslut boomer. Wheeler has a gear channel, I don't think I've ever seen a video of him taking pictures other than this one.http://www.jasonlanier.com/blog/2017/6/12/the-shoot-between-jason-lanier-and-ken-wheeler-the-angry-photographer-using-the-sony-a9-and-the-fuji-gfx
He taught me sigma lenses are crap.
>>3664122but modern ones aren't
Thoughts on Nick Carver, especially in terms of the courses he offers online?
Nick Carver>nobody photographer outside of youtube>no awards>published in lowtier local magazines>didn't learn from any photographic mastersCourses cost $200+Magnum online courses>magnum photographers>recipients of high-ranking awards>published books to high critical acclaim>has mentored under and worked with photographic mastersCourses costs $99I don't see what credentials Nick Carver has that would make me want to shell out $200 for listening to him. Also...a 7 hour course on metering? What the fuck
>>3664405personally, I'm specifically looking into metering courses, any good alternatives you got anon?
>>3664417http://www.fredparker.com/ultexp1.htmYour welcome for saving you $200
>>3664400I like his videos, but with the unlimited resources the internet provides for free nowadays, I'd call you dumb for spending money on photography related courses. Especially since most things photography related are heavily based on practice.That is though, unless you want to support him and the videos he makes. But in that case you wouldn't be posting here.
>>3664405>I don't see what credentials Nick Carver has that would make me want to shell out $200 for listening to him.He gives a discount every now and then for $99. Credentials don't mean much anyways. Magnum photogs love being in their own little club huffing their own farts. Like Gilden, if you've seen one of his exploitative photos of ugly people, you've seen them all. Imo it all comes down to who you like listening to, rather than who says it best, especially when it's all free anyways with experience.
What are some good cameras for capturing night time shots of rioting in LA?Budget is 500$
Phase One XT IQ4. Go loot one you fucking casual
>>3664034No. Get a 35 1.8. 50mm isn't wide enough.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7M2Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 9.2.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)35 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2020:05:30 23:08:21Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating800Lens Aperturef/2.8Brightness2.8 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length35.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>3664033There is no purpose
>>3664029>fire>low light
>budgetDo you not have a local camera store to loot from?
Why m50 is so unpopular? Technically it is better than the various Sony alpha but it struggles to diffuse.
>>3664631sony cheats at dynamic range. In real situation fuji apsc are rivaling ff cameras, while sonys are on the level of mft cameras. They've few generations old sensors in their a6xxx range. Fuji has one generation newer sensors in their top apsc line.
>>3664638>virtually the only thing you're trading off is blurry backgrounds with fullframe, and some ability to act like a night vision goggle.I am pretty sure you are trolling, but if you are not, did you read any of the above discussion?>>3664644The DXOmark measurements are just those, measurements. No fake specsheets from Sony have influence on that. > In real situation fuji apsc are rivaling ff cameras, while sonys are on the level of mft cameras. That's a nice claim. Have any actual data to back that up? Otherwise its just another worthless opinion. I must say it sure is a shame that DXO doesnt do Fujis.
>>3664648>I am pretty sure you are trolling, but if you are not, did you read any of the above discussion?I did, yes, and I think you're wrong.
>>3664651>I did, yes, and I think you're wrong."I read the data, but it hurts my feelings and therefore I will ignore it and conclude that you are wrong"lmao@ur life
>>3654044>normal people can't tell difference between portrait mode and professional DSLR shotssad truth
How do I work for National geography as a photography?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6100Camera SoftwareILCE-6100 v1.00Maximum Lens Aperturef/6.3Focal Length (35mm Equiv)600 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2020:05:25 19:53:48Exposure Time1/1000 secF-Numberf/6.3Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating800Lens Aperturef/6.3Brightness6.9 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length400.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2048Image Height1365RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>3661008Unironically? Take upwards of 50,000 shots of your subject and pick out the 1-2 pictures that are good.NatGeo photographers are real shit. It reminds me of that metaphor where if you let 5,000 monkeys type on a typewriter for infinity, they will eventually type out great works
>>3662753Damn the butt hurt
>>3662753Imagine believing you or anybody else needs to take 500 or even 50 photos to take a good one regardless of the subject. Sell everything.
>>3662772Imagine having such large delusions about your skill and prowess as a photographer that you would only take a few photos of a subject.>Not gonna make it
>>3662354>they do it for free
Anyone into clouds?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiColor Space InformationsRGB
>>3664561[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera ModelRS988Equipment MakeLG ElectronicsSensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image Created2018:04:12 17:31:26Vertical Resolution72 dpiImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiAltitude0.00 mColor Space InformationsRGBF-Numberf/1.8Focal Length4.42 mmExposure ModeAutoImage Height2988Scene Capture TypeStandardExposure ProgramNot DefinedWhite BalanceAutoImage Width5312Metering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryExposure Bias0 EVBrightness0 EVISO Speed Rating50Exposure Time1/3511 sec
>>3664562[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeLG ElectronicsCamera ModelVS987Camera SoftwareWindows Photo Editor 10.0.10011.16384Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2020:06:01 14:46:50Exposure Time1/2945 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramNot DefinedISO Speed Rating50Brightness9.5 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length4.42 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width5312Image Height2988Exposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardAltitude0.00 m
>>3664565[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeLG ElectronicsCamera ModelVS987Camera SoftwarePicasaSensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2019:08:25 08:38:25Exposure Time1/1790 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramNot DefinedISO Speed Rating50Brightness0 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length4.42 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width5312Image Height2988Exposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardUnique Image ID67a019a71d463b460000000000000000Altitude0.00 m
>>3664567[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera ModelVS987Equipment MakeLG ElectronicsSensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2019:03:26 19:35:09Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiISO Speed Rating50Exposure ProgramNot DefinedF-Numberf/1.8Exposure Time1/439 secFocal Length4.42 mmFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardExposure Bias0 EVDigital Zoom Ratio1.7Image Height2988White BalanceAutoBrightness6.7 EVImage Width5312Exposure ModeAutoColor Space InformationsRGBAltitude0.00 m
>>3664572I've gotta take care of some other stuff for now, so that's enough dumping for a bit, but there's a good mix of some of my favorite clouds I've captured. Maybe if the thread's still up later I can post some more, but mostly I'm looking forward to other people's cloudsAlso, the photos starting with >>3664561were older photos taken on my phone, so they're quality isn't quite as good as the previous, but they're still pretty nice, imo.Also also, in this thread, I especially liked>>3662198>>3662185>>3660514>>3659627>>3659086>>3658609>>3663716keep up the good work!Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
been trying to steer clear of instagram other than posting my own shit but i feel like i fell for the "woah look TEAL" phase with the sky/blues[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS Rebel T6iCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 9.2 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.6Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2020:05:28 04:17:24Exposure Time1/400 secF-Numberf/13.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating800Lens Aperturef/13.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length89.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
>>3663530this isn't IG bait because those photogs can do basic things like exposure, focusing, and posing. IG is just something you tell yourself so you can feel better.
>>3664118do you see her left hand?
>>3663603>exposure mode: AutoThere's your answer to the wacky et-values
>>3664332He was in aperture-priority mode. So he selected f/13 manually.
>>3664332>Exposure Program: Aperture PriorityEven if he would be in auto, those remarks are still relevant since he should be shooting in AP anyways.
what's your excuse, you don't even need to leave the house these days
>>3660861also /p/ needs to stop obsessing over Ken. Plenty of retards who would say retarded stuff.
>>3660882I mean it's not necessarily meant to be sad, there's nothing wrong with enjoying the hobby for personal fulfillment.
My product photos have been published in design magazines and national ad campaigns. Also, I don't own a camera. I have no idea what I'm doing.
>>3658974Petapixel published some photos I took once but that's it
I had a bit of exposure but that was years ago. Mainly an interview with a prominent architecture site and a couple of online arty sites. Nothing major mind.
OH NO SONYBROS, WE GOT TOO COCKY! https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=mV9EU0FtU90&feature=emb_logo
>>3663630Just the hiking advantage for now I guess.But the argument nowadays mainly boil down to mirrorless lenses being superior to dslr lenses.https://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=1235&Camera=1175&Sample=0&FLI=0&API=0&LensComp=480&CameraComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=0andhttps://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=1439&Camera=1175&Sample=0&FLI=0&API=0&LensComp=1227&CameraComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=0
>>3663633>Just the hiking advantage for now I guess.Some people do prefer an OVF as well.In the end though, I think it doesn't really matter. I am pretty sure that all the people that argue about this would not take better shots with one or the other, and if they do, they should improve their photography anyways. They are just tools in the end, and we should just be thankful that even an entry level cheapo camera blows high end cameras from 15 years ago out of the water in terms of what they can do.
>>3660552Unironically Just shoot with your smartphone if your after this. You do realise this is a hobbyist board right? This is like going on /g/ and telling PCBG to just buy an Optiplex.
>>3659806
>>3663956So much gear, so little photos. Sad.
I've have never edited my photos before. Im new to photography, and been meaning to use Lightroom. Before I purchase it, is there a way I can download it with paying it monthly? if not, oh well.Any advice for beginners on using Light room?
>>3664150Yes. Lightroom has a free 7-day trial version:https://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop-lightroom/free-trial-download.html
I did the trial run and for 9.99 you get access to lightroom and photoshop on both mobile and PC. its pretty cool to be able to easily move photos around between the platforms for both sahring and editing.
>>3664158I use lightroom CC pirated, and it hasn't failed me once.
>>3664150Don't. Adobe sucks with their subscriptions. Just buy the pendant by dxo or phase one or skylum or on1 or photoninja or corel.Or use open source darktable.
stop editing your photos
Uncle Terry
thank fuck this thread will stop getting bumped>>3622407every time
fresh >>>/b/828471589 winz!
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4a3eb80d010005di.html
katey perry?
lol
>>3660273please tell me more about this, sounds like a great idea that may have been poorly executed
>>3664398This is a retarded idea and you should stop. If you really need a tele for birding, look for the Canon 400mm f/5.6, or a Sigma 100-400.
>>3660169pretty much all my shots are taken on the lumix 12-60mm
>>3664412>retarded ideaas in, no IS, no AFor as in, these lenses are too poorly made and unusableor as in, don't go with reflexthe canon 400mm is $800 and the sigma is $600. I haven't even upgraded my t3i because I didn't want to spend ~$600 on a new camera.
>>3664398>I'm looking to get a reflex for my canon dslr.The cheap ones are VERY VERY SHIT. The only catadioptric I've ever heard of that's worth a damn is the Minolta 500/8, and there's not a good way to mount that on a Canon DSLR.Manual focus isn't too difficult at f/8, but it's also somewhat academic since most mirror lenses are so bad that you can't really tell in focus from out of focus.
I recently stumbled upon a bag of 35mm slides of what appears to be 1960's Taipei, many at night. They all have a red tint on them but i have done my best to neutralize it in Lightroom. I believe these are shot on Ektachrome. DSLR scanned with my Df, a 55 2.8 macro lens and a Nikon PK13 macro extension. I found these in an antique shop, along with the Nikon 200 F4 pre-AI in my bag, so presumably, these may have been shot on some sort of Nikon camera, maybe an F or a Nikkormat, or even a Nikomat, as they were sold there.I will update this thread as I go through them. There's probably enough for a roll of film.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON DfCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern800Focal Length (35mm Equiv)55 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2020:05:25 15:07:39Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length55.00 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>3661261>Kowloon Star Ferry Pier/Bus Terminus at the tip of the Kowloon Peninsula>Jordan Road ferry pier. Long since gone but I remember itThanks mate. I am to young remember the real older parts of HK in person. Should've known better as the star-ferry one doesn't have any clock towers.
>>3660949Very cool, thank you. They are labeled as Taipei from the seller but some of the slides are labeled with Hong Kong locations I had a feeling it was HK with all the British cars roaming about, once I scanned them and saw some of the locations.I have been busy working weird hours but I will get back to scanning the rest of these soon. I also figured out how to get a filter on it, it's a Nikon ES-1.
bumping to the top we're out and about and I found more, these are in square format
>>3664374https://www.alexburkephoto.com/blog/2015/03/10/luminosity-masks-and-film-scansYo Suge, you try this on the scans? I think it'll clean them right up.
this is your best thread yet, sugar:^)
