File: NoMLU.jpg (3.55 MB, 1536x2048)

3.55 MB JPG

No mirror lock up

5.6 1/30

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:04:09 10:38:38
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: MLU.jpg (2.86 MB, 1536x2048)

2.86 MB JPG

Mirror lock up

5.6 1/30

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:04:09 10:38:50
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4302686
I’m surprised its actually noticeable. How huge is your mirror?

File: meh.jpg (2.1 MB, 2048x1622)

2.1 MB JPG

>>4302687
This was shot with a Hasselblad 500CM.

Yeah I took his portrait and then realized I didn't use the mirror lock up so I quickly turned around and asked to take it again. I've been told anything under 1/60 will have a noticed difference so that's what I do now.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:04:03 13:10:15
ISO Speed Rating	100
Light Source	Daylight
Flash	No Flash
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 2024-04-08-0013.jpg (1.74 MB, 3372x2617)

1.74 MB JPG

>>4302033
I will because I actually suffer for my art, I almost got tetanus.

Shoot on Lucky SHD 100, not too bad but it curls a lot.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Minolta
Camera Model	Scan Dual II
Camera Software	darktable 4.4.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:08 15:58:32
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3372
Image Height	2617

>>4302687
>I’m surprised its actually noticeable
me too, but that's at 1/30
Is it actually that noticeable in faster settings, like 1/60" and up, though?
Also, >>4302685 did you take these handheld or in a tripod?
I can see the difference when looking at the jacket's threads, the t-shirt et cetera
>>4302690
oh, got the answer before I could post the question lol
will post anyways because fuck it
Have you ever made this comparison with faster shutter speeds?
>unrelated but
there's too much space above his head for my taste
having his face right in the center brings all the weight down and unbalanced, in my opinion
>>4302690
the deadcentered horizon line makes this shot kinda bland too
You don't need have all your shots perfectly centered if your subject doesn't ask for it, anon desu

File: 2024-04-08-0003.jpg (2.17 MB, 2555x3843)

2.17 MB JPG

>>4302693
Again, not bad for 5 bucks. Look at that rust

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Minolta
Camera Model	Scan Dual II
Camera Software	darktable 4.4.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:08 15:55:16
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2555
Image Height	3843

File: 2024-04-08-0004.jpg (2.36 MB, 3870x2663)

2.36 MB JPG

>>4302696
OH IT ALSO HAS BIRD SHIT

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Minolta
Camera Model	Scan Dual II
Camera Software	darktable 4.4.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:08 15:55:32
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3870
Image Height	2663

>>4302693
>>4302696
>>4302697
I didn't shoot for almost 4 months after I had a baby. I shot a few rolls recently and felt terrible about my photos. I didn't like the composition, I didn't like the objects I chose, the light, literally everything was bad, I couldn't even develop it properly.
But now I see your pictures and it makes me even worse because now I'm starting to like the crap I took. I'm horrified.

Nothing personal bro

File: peehole.jpg (2.26 MB, 2048x1359)

2.26 MB JPG

>>4302694
Everything is handheld, and that 4x5 is pretty centered if I crop the black film edge. I took the shot because I loved the blue sky and golden beige sand. The wave might be throwing you off, it's pretty close to centered horizon for eyeballing it handheld.

It's not interesting to anyone else, even to me besides maybe the color. I'm not going to ever formally post it anywhere online since it was like my 6th shot with the camera ever but I loved that afternoon and so it makes me smile even if it's uninteresting.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:04:09 11:08:22
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: dont frame dont focus jus(...).jpg (2.91 MB, 2048x1359)

2.91 MB JPG

>>4302700

2.0 1/15 in the subway cause I had a filter on and I was too lazy to take it off

More people should post photos with every response, imo it'll make for a better thread than that last one I lurked on

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:04:09 11:08:54
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 2024-04-08-0005.jpg (2.61 MB, 3793x2543)

2.61 MB JPG

>>4302699
I promised photos of garbage and I am posting photos of literal garbage.
You are agonizing over perfection and not even posting photos.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Minolta
Camera Model	Scan Dual II
Camera Software	darktable 4.4.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:08 15:55:58
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3793
Image Height	2543

File: 2024-04-08-0001.jpg (1.35 MB, 3780x2610)

1.35 MB JPG

>>4302706
Well I took other photos also not only of rusty shit lmao

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Minolta
Camera Model	Scan Dual II
Camera Software	darktable 4.4.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:08 15:54:36
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3780
Image Height	2610

File: 2024-04-08-0018.jpg (2.45 MB, 3819x2576)

2.45 MB JPG

>>4302707
I also tested a zoom, I don't like them on digital and I am not sure about film either.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Minolta
Camera Model	Scan Dual II
Camera Software	darktable 4.4.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:08 16:00:28
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3819
Image Height	2576

>>4302693
you aren't vaxed anon?
weak

File: 2024-04-08-0017.jpg (1.51 MB, 2776x1827)

1.51 MB JPG

>>4302710
A photo of someone back! I must buy a Fuji now!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Minolta
Camera Model	Scan Dual II
Camera Software	darktable 4.4.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:08 19:11:50
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2776
Image Height	1827

File: YMHeardon9590827706-R1-10-11.jpg (818 KB, 1818x1228)

818 KB JPG

Topcon Super D repair came out good, test roll was nice.

Had some streaks on the film mid way through the roll but they are not consistent with a camera issue so something probably happened in development or scanning but i dont care it was a 5 dollar BW400CN test roll to verify the camera worked.

File: DSC00826.jpg (909 KB, 1488x992)

909 KB JPG

>>4302706
We didn't have a discussion before. I know nothing about you promises, just commented the photos I seen. In any case, garbage is just an object, everything else is nothing but photographer's eye.
Don't take it too close. You can fucking around and protect your bad photos or you can do some lessons learning for free.
>You are agonizing over perfection and not even posting photos.
Posted in previous tread (4 pics of svema,adox,bergger,orwo) and as I said I think they are bad as well, so I don't want to multiply garbage pics. Just unhappy that no-photo pause can affect the eye and hand so much, even for relatively short period of time.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7C
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 7.2 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:08 16:51:05
Exposure Time	1/6 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-1.7 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: YMHeardon9590837701-R1-20-16A.jpg (718 KB, 1818x1228)

718 KB JPG

Also vetted my F5. If you're on the fence about one and deciding between the F5, F6 and F100, I've shot all three. Get the F5.

File: [0] Oficina 15_med.jpg (4.18 MB, 3886x5200)

4.18 MB JPG

>>4302723
>I've shot all three. Get the F5.
Are they that different? And why the F5?
Not a fan of electronic cameras but it's always nice to know them
>>4302696
Is this digital noise in those white bricks over the tank, to the left, or is blown out in the film itself?
Not bad for $5 indeed, but I'd recommend Kentmere
It's $6 a roll and it's a really good film
Not "good enough for it's price", but actually good film

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 15.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:09 12:14:43
Exposure Time	1/8 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-1.2 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: IMG_5414.jpg (1.38 MB, 3205x1997)

1.38 MB JPG

The 645n so far is the most fun camera I own.

>can effortlessly snap pics
>fully autotragic if you want
>good ergos
>nice glass
>6x4.5 is neat

I’ve decided I’m going to sell one of my hassleblads. Can’t decide which.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPad mini
Camera Software	17.3.1
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	29 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:09 06:08:35
Exposure Time	1/30 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	250
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Brightness	0.7 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	3.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	3205
Image Height	1997
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4302749
Shame.

File: IMG_5208.jpg (1.58 MB, 1336x1905)

1.58 MB JPG

>>4302751
I think I’m leaning to the 500CM and replace it with a rolleiflex 2.8 I can’t see a situation where I’d pick the 500cm up over the rollei and between the 645 and SWC I think I have most other situations covered. The 500cm is just a beast off of a tripod in anything but sunlight.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	144 dpi
Vertical Resolution	144 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1336
Image Height	1905

File: IMG_4948.jpg (2.27 MB, 1488x1912)

2.27 MB JPG

>>4302749
>>4302752
I should mention I have also debated just selling it and grabbing a 8x10

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	144 dpi
Vertical Resolution	144 dpi
Image Width	1488
Image Height	1912

>>4302685
>>4302686
I can’t see a difference to be honest.

>>4302749
Skill issue

BASED, how low can you go??

>>4302749
>Can’t decide which.
just keep them all, what are you poor or something?

>>4302765
Eye issue

File: 2024-04-08-0016.jpg (1.56 MB, 2562x3194)

1.56 MB JPG

>>4302742
I do think that is the film, similar things happen with GP3 another chinese film. But Lucky works better with Rodinal.

I had been wanting to shoot Kentmere but it not that easy to find over here.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Minolta
Camera Model	Scan Dual II
Camera Software	darktable 4.4.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:08 15:59:40
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2562
Image Height	3194

File: canoscan 9000fii.jpg (1.48 MB, 1284x2156)

1.48 MB JPG

lads, just looking to get into negative scanning and i saw this flatbed for sale locally forr cheap. i know you all probably prefer the whole camera "scanning" rig setup, but if i can get the guy down to 20 bucks, is it "good enough"? anyone still use a flatbed scanner? apparently this was canon's top of the line consumer product at the time for negative and photo scanning. i might just set up a camera scanner eventuyally anyway since i have a camera, just need to look at making holders and shit.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	216 dpi
Vertical Resolution	216 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1284
Image Height	2156

>>4302771
Man it's $25
Just buy it and see how you like it. If you don't, just give it to someone else and take the loss
You spend more than this in Taco Bell, probably

>>4302771
Man it's $25
Just buy it and see how you like it. If you don't, just give it to someone else and take the loss
You probably spend more than this in a single trip to Taco Bell

>>4302772
>>4302775
fuckin hell i want some taco bell now. i'll shoot the guy a message lol.

>>4302771

is nice, running vuescan plus linux, seller probably forgot couple zeros from price, beware

File: [6] Kentmere Pan 400-Pano(...).jpg (3.52 MB, 7242x5891)

3.52 MB JPG

>>4302781
>why waste time say lot word when few word do trick

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 15.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:03:28 14:01:57
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	2.2 EV
Exposure Bias	-1 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: IMG_4794.jpg (1.13 MB, 2051x2987)

1.13 MB JPG

>>4302768
I just can’t rationalize keeping them when they’re barely used and the 500cm doesn’t offer as “unique” of an experience as the SWC.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2051
Image Height	2987
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4302800
As a former pen and watch collector, eventually you have to create some kind of scheduled rotation if you want to avoid having shelf queens. It sounds stupid I know, but it’s either that or get rid of things you actually like but don’t use much for whatever reason. If I have 10 watches and really like them all, but there are only 7 days in a week, well, you need to preplan that shit out, that sort of thing. Other people might be like “only keep the ones you truly like” but what do you do if that’s still a large number?

File: IMG_9781.jpg (1.73 MB, 2714x3790)

1.73 MB JPG

>>4302804
I’ve actually gone through this recently with my other hobby. At one point I had 127 firearms and recently “sold down” to 58. Although I still find myself asking what’s the point, yea I enjoy reading about them and shit but I almost never actually walk into my gun room and touch them.

>heres $30k worth of guns

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone X
Camera Software	14.8.1
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2021:12:28 13:37:47
Exposure Time	1/338 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	20
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Brightness	7.4 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	4.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	2714
Image Height	3790
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4302809
>58 firearms
>3 cameras
You know what you need to sell

File: fromacrosstheyard.jpg (2.81 MB, 2048x1359)

2.81 MB JPG

I love the composition and how the crowd kinda frames her in the light but the subject wasn't close enough.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:04:09 16:34:35
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: upclose.jpg (1.76 MB, 2048x1359)

1.76 MB JPG

>>4302813
So I got closer.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:04:09 16:34:55
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: IMG_4895.jpg (3.51 MB, 2892x3223)

3.51 MB JPG

>>4302812
It’s too much of a hobby now, I really enjoy the niche aspects of collecting firearms. Not to mention they’re appreciating assets. When I liquidated last year I had a little over $150k cash that I used to buy another rental property. I don’t foresee a camera collection having that kind of appreciation.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2892
Image Height	3223
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4302817
>firearms
>appreciating
Wrong, unless they’re antiques or extremely old and in well condition.

File: IMG_1305.jpg (1.74 MB, 2482x4026)

1.74 MB JPG

>>4302819
Anon, I’ve been heavily invested in firearms for over 15 years and it’s (part) of my day job. I believe it’s safe to say I know what I’m talking about in context to what I own as being appreciating.

>$6000 box of gun parts

10 years ago these were $2k tops.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone X
Camera Software	15.3.1
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2022:03:18 11:27:02
Exposure Time	1/15 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	50
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Brightness	2.1 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	4.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	2482
Image Height	4026
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4302816
>tattoos
Ew No move back

>/k/fags can't stop talking about how much they take it on the arse
many such cases

>>4302817
Lenses on the other hand...

File: [22] digitalização 2-Pano_med.jpg (3.51 MB, 5931x5867)

3.51 MB JPG

>>4302817
About the firearms and stuff, go to >>>/k/
About cameras: in your position I'd sell the SWC since it has a fixed lens and buy an equivalent lens for the 500CM if you like that wide angle
It's more versatile and you'll probably use it more
>>4302804
I don't think "keep the ones you like" is good advice
Keep the ones you USE
There's lots of stuff I like, but if I don't use them then why should I keep them?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 15.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:09 18:31:08
Exposure Time	1/45 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-9/640 EV
Exposure Bias	-1 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>4302843
There is nothing on the 500cm that’s as good as the swc. You can get a 40mm but it as more distortion and cost almost as much as the swc does.

File: A7R07029FECookedRetro80S.jpg (1.07 MB, 2048x1366)

1.07 MB JPG

>>4302742
>>>4302696
>Is this digital noise in those white bricks over the tank, to the left, or is blown out in the film itself?

>>4302770
>do think that is the film,

It's not noise, but it is a digital artifact, essentially highlight clipping. The ancient scanner he's using is unable to blast through the bricked highlights where his B&W film is over-exposed/over-developed.
That's what a "d-Max" rating shows; how dense a slide/neg can be, as measured with a densitometer, before the scanner can't accurately discern tonal gradation.
With camera scanning, especially if you're using a flash, you don't run into this kind of limitation so quickly, because you can just turn up the exposure.
>>4302710
This scan is showing noise (ie where the input to the scanner is the same but the output varies randomly) likely because the neg is too thin/underexposed and the curve applied to get a full scale of tone is too steep, exaggerating the read noise. If anything this highlights the limitations of these old-tech potato scanners more than the other ones; they use a (old-tech, noise prone) CCD line scanner and step it across the face of the film with a motor. With anything less than perfect negs going in, or even with a good neg trying to do a heavy edit, you show up these issues.
Pic related shows an *extremely* thin neg (dead developer), that I was still able to get a terrible image out of because the camera file is so clean. The speckles are from hard water, the halo around the edge is actually the flash illumination falloff.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7RM2
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	100 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
F-Number	f/10.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/10.0
Brightness	2.0 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Daylight
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1366
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>4302857
I've never used either, so I didn't know about that
The SWC seems to have really nice glass indeed
Anyway, as I've said previously: keep what you use, sell what you don't
It doesn't really matter if a camera has the best glass ever made if the owner doesn't use it
Things are made to be used

Would there be any negatives to shooting a wide angle only lens?

>>4302888
You might become too based. Hoping to score a 47mm lens for my 4x5 camera soon!! That's 12mm equivalent.

The DoF is so massive you don't need to worry about focusing at like f8.

>>4302906
What’s the closest distance you can get with a lens like that?

File: Screenshot_20240409_17104(...).jpg (224 KB, 1440x2547)

224 KB JPG

>>4302907
Very close.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Android UP1A.231005.007.G998U1UESAFXBC
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1440
Image Height	2547

>>4302907
I'll be using it with a helicoid that wont focus past infinity, but if you used bellows you could use it as a microscope.

>>4302888
Wide angle sucks for 99% of photos

>>4302917
Major skill issue.

>>4302816
cute!
in the first shot, i think there's too much space in the top half of the frame. good job getting the better shot

>>4302804
>>4302809
Remember these are the guys giving you c&c and gear advice, lol.

>>4302936
People with lots of money!? THE NERVE

>>4302937
Finances are a sore subject for you

>>4302936
>only povertyfags can give meaningful critique because reasons.
remember these are your average shitposters, lol.

File: 000070370025.jpg (3.92 MB, 3130x2075)

3.92 MB JPG

>>4302690
i took a similar photo a few months back

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 6.72.004 (171201)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3130
Image Height	2075

>>4302939
You want photography critique from camera collectors.

>>4302951
if they're shooting and posting photos here like anyone else, i don't see how being "camera collectors" invalidates anything.

>>4302951
most good photographers have been camera collectors.

>>4302957
You don’t know a single photographer irl

>>4302959
I know myself. Check and mate, nerd.

>>4302960
>Locally successful fine art

>>4302963
>changing the goalposts like a true nerd.

Checked and mated twice.

>>4302959
you think we would be shitposting on this faggot website if we did?

We almost did it bros. We kept thread high loaded with photos until muricans woke up. OFC they shit everything already so whatever

File: flash test 1.png (3.26 MB, 1359x2000)

3.26 MB PNG

testing out my cheap flash meter

>>4302816
very nice

File: IMG_1880.jpg (2.93 MB, 3024x2005)

2.93 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 7.41.004 (211021)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:02:24 13:16:46
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3024
Image Height	2005
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4302964
Meet yourself
>>4302967

How do I get over the “fear” of wasting film when shooting? I don’t know if that makes sense but I’m new to the film side of the hobby. The way film forces you to pay attention and make your shots count appeals to me but it’s still a nagging feeling.

File: doublexresize.jpg (1.4 MB, 1800x1179)

1.4 MB JPG

My 35mm color skopar (first version in ltm) arrived and its a beauty, feel as if i should upgrade my scanner to do it justice though

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4528
Image Height	2965
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2024:04:10 18:39:07
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1800
Image Height	1179

File: doublexreszie2.jpg (1.24 MB, 1179x1800)

1.24 MB JPG

>>4303019

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4521
Image Height	2960
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2024:04:10 18:39:29
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1179
Image Height	1800

File: doublexresize4.jpg (1.46 MB, 1800x1183)

1.46 MB JPG

>>4303022
feel as if there's too much going on in this photo, i probably should of gotten closer

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4457
Image Height	2929
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2024:04:10 18:40:54
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1800
Image Height	1183

File: doublexresize8.jpg (1.12 MB, 1800x1188)

1.12 MB JPG

>>4303025
last shot with the voigtlander, the rest of the roll was shot with a jupiter 8

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4521
Image Height	2985
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2024:04:10 18:52:47
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1800
Image Height	1188

File: doublexresize6.jpg (1.13 MB, 1190x1800)

1.13 MB JPG

>>4303027

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4513
Image Height	2983
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2024:04:10 18:41:57
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1190
Image Height	1800

File: doublexresize7.jpg (1.21 MB, 1800x1180)

1.21 MB JPG

>>4303028

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4431
Image Height	2904
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2024:04:10 18:42:28
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1800
Image Height	1180

File: doublexresize5.jpg (1.29 MB, 1800x1187)

1.29 MB JPG

>>4303030

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4513
Image Height	2977
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2024:04:10 18:41:20
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1800
Image Height	1187

File: A7R07029.jpg (3.56 MB, 7968x5320)

3.56 MB JPG

>>4302858
And I dug up the scan for verification.
For everyone who says Rodinal lasts forever, and that R09 One Shot is the same, either it doesn't, or it isn't.
This was developed in 1:50 for 14 minutes with inversions every minute, from a bottle that was mostly full, but first opened 2 years prior.
Rollei Retro 80S, exposed at 80, in a Nikon FE.
Frame numbers barely showed up.

>>4302816
so soft. was this a old zoom lens or smth?

>>4303033
You aren't the first person to report R09 going dead after a few years.

>>4303033
You aren't the first person to report R09 go dead. R09 clearly isn't a faithful rodenol clone like RDL or Adenol

>>4303003
i have so much film that i have a fear of NOT using it. film is meant to be used. you dont think "i think im gonna be wasting these ingredients" while cooking food, you say after the fact "that meal didnt taste too nice". photos arent real until they are printed, you dont know what you captured until you develop it.

>>4303044
fucking wish it was cheaper man, paying NZD for a roll of gold is ridiculous. Im actually getting a bunch sent from the states by a friend cause even with shipping etc its around half the price. And thats before getting ripped 20 bucks on dev without scans for each roll

File: IMG_1878.jpg (2.64 MB, 3024x2005)

2.64 MB JPG

Can you guess which film stock I used?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 7.41.004 (211021)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:02:24 13:16:39
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3024
Image Height	2005
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4303051
Kodak Vision3 500T

>>4303051
NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model EZ Controller
Camera Software EZ Controller 7.41.004 (211021)

>>4303051
>Cinestill
>Small-ish aperture, probably around f/11 or f/16
>Cathay Street in Birmingham's Chinatown
>Possibly after 10pm since stores seem to be closed
>You were using women's underwear
>Pastel pink with a lace on the front
>Probably sucking someone's dick, considering the low angle
I know everything, anon.
Don't even try to deny it.

>>4303056

Correct!

File: 3leggedfriend.jpg (1.98 MB, 2048x1359)

1.98 MB JPG

>>4302985
Hey thanks, here's another shot from that hang out.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:04:10 08:59:06
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: somebullshit.jpg (611 KB, 2000x1333)

611 KB JPG

>daylight loader
>can't use it in daylight
I been scammed
>>4303062
stick to the cute trannies

File: 1000019194.jpg (83 KB, 1280x720)

83 KB JPG

zenit is the best, use zenit

File: justforyou.jpg (2.35 MB, 2048x1359)

2.35 MB JPG

>>4303068
Now that I know what you like, here's one just for you.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:04:10 09:33:16
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: [10] Ektar 100 - 120_med.jpg (4.35 MB, 3941x5809)

4.35 MB JPG

>>4303072
unironically a good photo
why not post it instead of an out of focus shot of a hand holding it?
p.s.: I have a 4mm (6 gauge) piercing in my nipple, which I believe is the same gauge as the ones this guy has, and (although I love it) it hurted like hell to have it done. I can't imagine having a Prince Albert
>picrel selfportrait with my coin-flavoured tit

File: justforyou2.jpg (2.48 MB, 1359x2048)

2.48 MB JPG

>>4303081
Because it's not my photo to post. Does a missed focus shot bother you? Good. Minimum focus distance but I also didn't put too much effort into focusing either since no focusing tab and one handed.

Bet you this next one is going to annoy you too. This is the creator of that art.

The one time I think it would have been better for you to be nophoto lmao

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:04:10 10:07:23
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: [0] Bones 35_med.jpg (3.39 MB, 3801x5651)

3.39 MB JPG

>>4303083
Jesus, you got THIS triggered just because I asked for a decent photo instead of a photo of a photo?
I'm not even the bulk loading guy you were responding to, calm your tits
>Does a missed focus shot bother you?
>Bet you this next one is going to annoy you too.
To your discontent, I'm as unfazed as I could be
have a shitty unfocused portrait test shot

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 15.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:10 11:24:10
Exposure Time	1/30 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	1.4 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>4303039
>>4303037
If it’s that old, is 14 minutes really enough time though? I’ve seen that chem that old needs to get up to stand dev times and such, 1 hour or what have you.

File: txp70mm (5).jpg (1.17 MB, 1995x2543)

1.17 MB JPG

Nows my time to shine!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	10392
Image Height	13184
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:10 07:36:59
Color Space Information	sRGB
Light Source	Unknown

File: decisivemoment (1).jpg (3.13 MB, 1359x2048)

3.13 MB JPG

>>4303087
Idk man you brought up missed focus, seems like you're the one that's bothered. I could make the argument I never took you seriously from the start. Have another snapshit.

I never claimed or assumed you were the same person. All of a sudden I respond with the same length response and I need to clam down? Take your HRT and leave me alone.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:04:10 11:18:33
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: [0] Kentmere Pan 400-Pano(...).jpg (4.77 MB, 7048x5905)

4.77 MB JPG

>>4303100
you're too insecure lmao
touch grass

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 15.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:03:28 13:42:46
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	2.2 EV
Exposure Bias	-1 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>4302813
>>4302816
>>4303072
>>4303083
>>4303100
imagine the smell

>>4303069

<<Zenit made by sons and daughters of Moskva prostitutes.
<<FED made by children orphaned by name sakes police.
<<Keiv made with stronk German POWs and pilfered capitalist machines.

The winner is clear.

>>4303110
>capitalist
aka N-S.Cap

File: 367459778_204130706954329(...).jpg (820 KB, 2048x1542)

820 KB JPG

>>4302742

F5 is best value for money. F100 is lighter, but cost almost as much as the F5 which has many more features and is built like a brick shit house. F6 is built like the F5 but they're still like 1000 bucks for one.

F5 is the nice happy median between price and build quality. The AF is amazing on the F5 and the AA battery pack with a set of new Eneloop batteries will outlive you. I charged my set up when I bought it two years ago and have put probably 20 rolls through it and still showing max power.

Took it on a hike through Moab pic related and it was like 100 degrees outside it does not give two shits. I dropped it loading a roll of film like an idiot it just keeps going. The F5 is the Ford 300 I-6 of the 35mm world, when aliens discover our remains of our civilization 50000 years from now they're going to find one of these things and finish the roll of film in it.

F5 and F3 w/motor drive are the GOAT for Nikon 35mm. Honorable mention to the original F as well, also GOATed.

>>4303110
PRAKTICA NUMBAH ONE

File: -7- Ilford HP5-03_noborder.jpg (4.91 MB, 2592x3831)

4.91 MB JPG

>>4303119
Nice to know, man, thanks for the detailed reply
I got an F50 that belonged to my father, but as I said before I'm not a fan of electronic cameras
And of course, the F50 is not even a pro-level camera. I think I've only ever shot 2 rolls with it in... 5 years or so
It's just not my thing
But holy shit, it makes taking pictures absurdly easy, especially when shooting moving subjects
Picrel was taken during an open air concert and I don't think I would be able to capture it the way I did with a fully mechanical camera
I'll try to use it more, it's a good camera

>>4303128

Here's the thing about those Fxx cams (here in the States they are N models) they have the exact same features in some cases as the F5 and F4. Automated exposure. AF. In the case of the N90s/F90x it can drive AF-S lenses just like the later F5. Exposure bracketing. Auto rewind and advance.

With the F5 and F100s you're paying for build quality, ability to handle a drop, weather sealing and lens compatibility with AF-S, image stabilization compatibility as well as improved autofocus. They all take the same picture. I have an original N2000 and I can drive my 85/1.4D with it.

F50 is a decent camera put good glass on the front and it will take the same picture as an F6 or F6.

File: 3koe0k.jpg (86 KB, 1200x639)

86 KB JPG

>>4303110

WHY YOU NO MAKE MENTION OF GREATEST CAMERA MADE LENINGRAD??? CAMERA THAT BEARS OUR FOUNDERS NAME THAT KMZ DECIDE WAS GOOD ENOUGH TO CARRY IT??? LENINGRAD HAVE MULTI-LENS FINDER FOR 35, 50, 85 AND 135 OBJECTIV. ALSO HAVE BIG RANGEFINDER PATCH WHICH DUPLICATE IMAGE INSTEAD OF GHOST LIKE MANY RANGEFINDER. LENINGRAD WAS WINNER OF 1958 BRUSSELS GRAND PRIX AWARD, SAME YEAR OF CHINESE GREAT LEAP FORWARD.

LENINGRAD HAVE AUTOMATIC FILM ADVANCE LIKE RIFLE OF MIKHAIL KALASHNIKOV AND HAVE BEEN TO SPACE ON VOSTOK ROCKET WHILE SILLY CAPITALIST STILL FIGURING OUT REDSTONE ROCKET AND NO-GO NAVAJO ICBM WHICH RELY ON MISTAKES FOR FIGURING OUT OF WORK. MISTAKES GET YOU KILLED LIKE BASTARD NAZI ARMY WHO DECIDE TO FIGHT IN WINTER OF MOTHERLAND.

LENINGRAD ALSO HAVE UNDERWATER HOUSING FOR TAKING OF PICTURES IN VOLGA RIVER OF CRASHED STUKA DIVE BOMBER. MAKE SURE OF BUYING 4-SCREW FRONT PLATE THOUGH TWO-SCREW PLATE GOOD ENOUGH.

ZENITH IS CHEAP TRASH STAMPED METAL CAMERA AFTER ZENITH-S MODEL. FED NAMED FOR ASSHOLE IRON FELIX DZHERZINSKY WHO KILL MANY SOVIET CITIZENS AND FOUNDER OF CHEKA. WHY YOU WANT NAME OF ASSHOLE ON CAMERA???

LENINGRAD ALSO HAVE BUILT IN OBJECTIV FINDER, FED AND OTHER RANGEFINDER YOU HAVE TO ATTACH FINDER EXTERNAL FOR VIEWING OF DIFFERENT OBJECTIV. LENINGRAD CAMERA FINE!! DO NOT NEED STUPID ATTACHMENT. ATTACHMENT MAKE YOU LOOK LIKE FAT AMERICAN PIG WHO ATTACH CHINESE FLASHLIGHT AND CHEAP SCOPE TO SKS RIFLE WHEN DO NOT NEED OF FUNCTION. RIFLE IS FINE! CAMERA IS FINE!

KIEV GOOD CAMERA THOUGH, NAME FOR BEAUTIFUL CITY OF KIEV UKRAINE, PEARL OF DNIPRO RIVER JUST DO NOT OVERTIGHTEN SHUTTER RIBBON WHEN SERVICE OR WILL BREAK SHUTTER AND HAVE TO BUY ANOTHER.

File: 15970003.jpg (3.73 MB, 3089x2048)

3.73 MB JPG

why do the first couple frames of a roll look like this? the rest of the roll looks fine and some of my rolls don't have the issue at all so idk if it's a light leak

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	QSS-32_33
Camera Software	QSS-32_33 8.02.005 2006.12.27
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3089
Image Height	2048

>>4303142
yes light leak
>>4303137
CHAIKA STRONG

File: -10- Ilford HP5-02_noborder.jpg (4.66 MB, 3254x2210)

4.66 MB JPG

>>4303132
oh that's cool!
The best part is that my father handed it to me with some nice glasses:
>an old 28-200mm f/3.8 Tamron
It was dropped and the autofocus doesn't work anymore, but the lens works just fine. Not the best lens around, but it's pretty decent
>70-300mm f/4 Nikon AF Nikkor
Since the other lens was dropped my father bought this one like a boomer would (love u dad)
>big lens = good
>bigger lens = gooder
Not the fastest lenses, sure, but I generally like shooting at around f/8 and I've been using a tripod frequently, so it doesn't really matter

File: txp70mm (7).jpg (1.67 MB, 2989x2346)

1.67 MB JPG

Even if the pictures/subject matter isn't incredible there's something so relaxing about setting up a large format camera on a nice day and taking a few pics.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	14949
Image Height	11730
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:10 11:02:58
Color Space Information	sRGB
Light Source	Unknown

>>4303143
any idea why it would only happen to the first few frames or why some rolls are totally fine?

>>4303164
Is it bulk loaded film? I usually lose a couple frames with my bulk loaded film.

>>4303151

When I shot AF-D lenses, which those are, my Holy Trinity was Nikon 28-105 f3.5-4.5, 50 1.4 AF-D and 70-210/4 AF, all very good lenses. You can buy them for a song now

>>4303165
the rolls it's happened on are respooled shit like JCH and cinestill

>>4303167
Yeah that's from the bulk loading. The light leaks look almost exactly like the ones I get.

>>4303106
Did you miss focus? What lens?

File: Image 103 (1).jpg (1.36 MB, 2718x1815)

1.36 MB JPG

>>4303167
See. Always the same 2-4 frames, and always the same look to the light leaks.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4531
Image Height	3027
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:10 11:54:49
Color Space Information	sRGB
Light Source	Unknown

>>4303167

This also happened today on my Topcon with my roll of Foma 400 respooled as FlicFilm Ultrapan 400. Lost the last two frames on the roll and the very end of the film broke off and hung the mirror up.

File: Boardwalk4.jpg (2.04 MB, 2048x1363)

2.04 MB JPG

Revisiting some rolls from last summer has me excited to go out again.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:04:10 14:57:24
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4303176
ewww

>>4303175

The leader broke off at the point where it is inserted into the take up spool. Might have been my bad, Foma has a thinner base than Kodak and Fuji and I might have pulled on it too hard to verify it was taken up in the camera once the door was closed.

>>4303167
Sometimes it's light piping from the film leader when you load it. Some bases do that unless you load in shadow.

File: test (6).jpg (2.79 MB, 2048x1359)

2.79 MB JPG

Another one from last summer I had forgotten about.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:04:10 15:09:19
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4303186
I hope that no one tried to steal your beanie

>>4303190
I forgot to push my portra that day. I gave them my beanie willingly.

File: ok (1).jpg (1.81 MB, 1358x2048)

1.81 MB JPG

>>4303190
No, but a Chinese dude did try to get in my face. We later became friends and everyone clapped.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:04:10 15:41:02
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: [2] Ektar 100-Pano_nobord(...).jpg (3.9 MB, 5587x5546)

3.9 MB JPG

>>4303166
I'll send that old Tamron to a repair shop and see if they can fix it
Must be something kinda easy to fix, because the little engine still works, but it goes back and forth and 'doesn't know' when it's focused
It's a good camera, I'll get the lens fixed and try to use it more
>>4303171
>Did you miss focus?
I don't think so, but it sure is grainy
Shot at 3AM at iso 3200, so there's that
>What lens?
Mamiya Sekor-C 127mm f/3.5

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 15.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:10 17:09:50
Exposure Time	1/80 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	1.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: A7R06996FE28mmSuperiaCoonar.jpg (1.65 MB, 1366x2048)

1.65 MB JPG

>>4303091
Actual rodinal just didn't go bad, I wasn't trying to save old chems or anything, I just assumed it would be fine. I subsequently tried another roll at 1:25 and for a longer time that wasn't quite as badd but still didn't dev to full tone, so I won't be using this bottle again. Sucks, because there's really no way for me to get through a 500ml bottle that quick at 1:50 unless I just go ham on the retro 80s, that's the only film I use it for.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7RM2
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.22
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	100 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
F-Number	f/9.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/9.0
Brightness	-1.7 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1366
Image Height	2048
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>4303205
ewwww

>>4303223
>>4303100
>"YoU'rE tHe OnE wHo's BoThErEd"
Said the guy obsessing over me for the past 7+ hours for posting a shaky out of focus photo of another photo
>pathetic
it's funny how the only good photo you posted was taken by someone else LMAO
I just wanted to see it properly
Grow up, boy
Get back to shooting some terribly framed dog or girl

File: 2024-04-08-0008.jpg (918 KB, 3631x2487)

918 KB JPG

fumo
>>4302858
huh that does makes sense, but its weird because I have only noticed it with chinese film, and you are correct the one where it shows noise it really underexposed, so make it worse.

But oh well, too lazy to get a DSLR and doing camera scanning.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Minolta
Camera Model	Scan Dual II
Camera Software	darktable 4.4.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:08 15:56:49
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3631
Image Height	2487

File: filters.jpg (161 KB, 623x522)

161 KB JPG

bought these the other day. anyone have pics using these filters?

>>4303230
I was commenting on your bad color grading ??? Get help.

>>4303237
I didn't even mention it's because it was out of focus or anything like that
I was saying you've been obsessing over me all day long, which is true
So then again: grow up, stop obsessing over me and go touch some grass

File: 000100760010.jpg (1.89 MB, 3088x2048)

1.89 MB JPG

The new ORWO film is pretty neat, if you don't mind your pics looking like they were taken in 1913.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 7.20.004 (200730)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Bottom, Right-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3088
Image Height	2048

>>4303280
Isn't that the allure
>>4303261
meds

>>4303281
Yeah, it's not going to dethrone Tri-X in my rotation, but it's definitely going to be something I'll grab semi-regularly.

>>4303280
Do you finger squeegee your film or is that from your camera? Apparently I have grit embedded in my fingers so I can't do that.

File: Screenshot_20240410_09310(...).jpg (611 KB, 1440x1702)

611 KB JPG

>>4302817
>>4302809
Gunbro I found the perfect camera for you.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Android UP1A.231005.007.G998U1UESAFXBC
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1440
Image Height	1702

>>4303287
That's just on the emulsion. There's more stuff like that on some frames. I like the look, but the production quality is so-so.

>>4303292
The scratch on the top?

>>4303294
Yup. There's a massive light leak on the last frame as well. This isn't something you use if you want clean negatives, lol.

File: kodakgold2004.jpg (4.82 MB, 2760x2248)

4.82 MB JPG

Just got back two rolls of gold 200

I put borders on them because I can and I do what I want.

Anyway here's some I liked

File: kodakgold2003.jpg (4.72 MB, 2760x2248)

4.72 MB JPG

>>4303298

File: kodakgold2007.jpg (4.87 MB, 2760x2248)

4.87 MB JPG

>>4303300

>>4303302
These were all shot mostly in broad daylight, I needed to test for light leaks(there are several) but I feel they're pretty tasteful. I'm still gonna replace the seals though.

Most were somewhere between 1 to stops overexposed unless I forgot to change shutter speed.

>>4303304
MF? I have Gold 200 in 120 that I've been excited to shoot but I'm also testing for light leaks after I did a quick patch with fabric paint when I noticed pinholes in the bellows

>>4303322
MF as in manual focus? If so yeah I have an old minolta x700 I bought in 2016 (before they started gouging)

It was a steal except the I improperly changed the seals and have to re do it.

I did dig the gold 200, but I'm more of a B/W person but it's a good snapshitting film.

>>4303298
Double borders would have been better. Maybe next time!

>>4302693
>>4303234
are you autistic kidult who post in plush dolls thread? it tells a lot actually

>>4303324
as in medium format

>>4303328
Oh, no 35mm.

My bad.

>>4303326
>kidult
you are posting on 4chan

>>4303334
I have a theory based on my own experience that 4chan and reddit are totally degenerative platforms but only from POV of English native speakers. Because for people with smaller language representation it is not so easy to find a group with the same interest they have, especially if we are talking about something not very poplar like photography in general and analog photography in particular.

So, if my theory is correct and if we ill take two guys from here, one from murica and one from Czech republic, murican will be almost always a human garbage with some mental issues, but Czech have a lot of chances to be a nice guy with family, work, not retarded or creepy.

>>4303340
Based and notMuricanpilled

File: lollmaoeven.jpg (4.81 MB, 1996x2000)

4.81 MB JPG

>>4303230
I can't express how happy it makes me coming back to the thread a day later and seeing you lash out at randoms. I guess it really did bother you you couldn't see that cock in full detail.

So rent free you kept track of time and responses. Hilarious. Probably got you all riled up cause my throw away photos are the same quality as your body of work you seem to think is good. Here's another photo that didn't come out too well, probably better than anything you'll ever shoot. Aerochrome batches are starting to show their age.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:04:11 09:38:05
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4303384
Why do you only post that one generic photo multiple times when you apparently have good aerochrome pics?

i rewound my film... but it didn't... i think it ripped in the canister...

>>4303384
>I can't express how happy it makes me
>I guess it really did bother you
delusional and pathetic
>So rent free you kept track of time
uh... actually 4chan does that, you know?
I literally just went back and saw the timestamp of the post
You can deny all you want, you're constantly overreacting for over a day, coming after me in the comments and getting mad at me for no reason and then trying to "no u" me
Grow up, get a life
That's just sad

>>4303428
You need to rebuke him with an even redder picture than his. It is the only way.

File: [8] digitalização 1_nobor(...).jpg (3.29 MB, 2884x4312)

3.29 MB JPG

>>4303429
oh boy, don't I have just the right one for it

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 15.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:09 22:14:51
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	9/160 EV
Exposure Bias	-1 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>4303434
sopa do missed focus uma delicia

this might be more of /gear/ question, but it does concern the late film era.
when you look at late film SLRs many of them have the "standard" PSAM dial (or P Tv Av M or whatever), just like later digital cameras.
Did Nikon steal that design from Canon, or the other way around?