>>388092
Your art looks like something I'd see in every single pamphlet, business website, doctor pamphlet, ever. So I guess good luck since it's the exact art style companies love to use.

>>388092
Have you considered using Fiverr?

>>388075
>Most common monitors in design studios are the iMac pro
Depending on the type of design, this is mostly true.

>>388075
>Only place I've seen a lot of ColorEdge monitors are for the video editors or 3D-artists, because they need to use specific hardware to render their shit.
I mostly see ColorEdge in places that are doing color correction, on a pro level. Nobody here is set up to do that kind of work, knows how to do that kind of work, or needs to, because pre-press will do it for you.
I'm trained in color correction, and that's why I know the high end stuff at home is a waste of time, because it will never be supported by the right environment and tools and training. I know how to set up and use a ColorEdge, and I know I don't need to.

>>386855
Depends if you do GD with a lot of 3D or video editing. If so, you may want to try an ultrawide (21:9 for example) monitor. Thats kinda like having 2 Monitors which s very handy and I prefer one huge screen over 2 smaller screens.

>>388122
Got your G7?

File: godlike.jpg (37 KB, 606x622)

37 KB JPG

>>386855
CRT for that epic accurate RGB and xray radition eye cancer

File: 21fb4b04c2895574dce144586(...).jpg (41 KB, 360x480)

41 KB JPG

>>385107
It's just a way to make a layout

It will fix your shitty design? no
It is the best way to make a layout? no

i dont think its so much that the golden ratio is pretty to look at. it's similar to the rule of thirds. it gives balance to an image.

also it's in nature.

so from what i could understand from the video your theory is that apple used a random application to the golden ratio.

but what you didnt do was fit the whale back into the golden ratio. you just used the shapes from apples logo.

now make the whale your youtube logo for memes and get rich

File: Happiness.jpg (149 KB, 790x954)

149 KB JPG

Childhood Is When You Worship Batpig
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Yc3r87EFug
Happiness Is Chuck X's Face On The $1 Bill
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezfy9NZh4ak
AIR/TREES/WATER/ANIMALS

>Bob Kane & Abel

>>385107
Test

>>388171
im sorry, ma'am.
youve got the corona

>>388127
>>377839

I think others have said this, but it needs to be more hairy/gritty/fuzzy, vectors are too sharp.

>>388036
youre out of your league doing the background - fix the initial bit, reconcile the strangenesses: the difference between the angels and death (like diff styles) and just get a first acceptable pass at that done

its not great, but can at least become passing for what it is

>>388114
I'll need a bit more specific critiques also the background was just for fun, this is all for fun and improving my technique from advice and critiques.

>>388107
I'd have to draw them if I want it hairier

>>386065
>the majority doesn't work on small formats
>many of them lacks of contrast

They seems kinda ok, but you need to improve on the technical level, remember that logos have to be mainly useful

File: MortonsList_WheelofKarma.webm (2.24 MB, 1080x1080)

2.24 MB WEBM

13 logos, plus 1 macro logo

>>387949
what the fuck
you didn't make this just to showcase these logos did you?
MAKE IT STOP SPINNING AAAAAHHHH

File: eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJp(...).jpg (6 KB, 116x112)

6 KB JPG

>>387844
If you don't know shit about either GD or presentation it's not on me, just putting drop shadows on logos makes them hella bad from the get go, less recognizable and readable and of course makes that shit looks old/washed up.

What's cringe was thinking that any """decent""" graphic designer here wouldnt trashtalk the whole lot.
Not putting retarded effects on logos are pretty much the first thing to know in the field, it just mean you either quite new to illustrator/photoshop and you were like " hihihi lmao i know how to put effects look at me I'm adobe certified ^^^^^" or you are plain retarded.

And also fuck off with your "adding drop shadows to make something stand out more on a transparent background", you just thought it would looks good rather than "make something stand out more", else you would have just use a jpg format without any background and it would have done the trick for 99% of those posted, don't find excuses, you suck.

File: Artboard_1.png (111 KB, 1000x1000)

111 KB PNG

My shitty personal logo...

>>388059
post that image on /wsr/ and ask someone to make it outline or vector

So you want to make design without having illustrator and photoshop? that’s a bit retarded and if you have them it took me 2min at best to find it online and do the magic trick.

>>388058
resolve doesn't handle av1, opus nor the webm container einstein, so even if it gets vp9 you still need to transcode your sources to change the container

I started off using Final Cut Pro because I got the student discount that comes with logic pro x. It took me a short while to realize both software suck ass so I switched to Adobe Premiere (which I got for free as a student bundle) and Ableton Live 9 (which I pirated lol) and I reached ascended mode. I needed to use truly inferior software to appreciate Adobe Premiere. Before using any of this shit though, I used
>Shotcut
>Sony Vegas Pro
>Da Vinci Resolve
They have their pros and cons, but premiere just has everything I need.

>>387819
i use format factory as a secondary program to deal with this stuff, it's still a good video editor despite the limitations from the decoder

>>388060
nigga u asked what im using, not please fix my dumb little problems

im making shit videos for my friends of games we play, it works and is free

>>388089
>(You)
I'm not OP, just some anon who works with video

>bottom line for pro non-linear editing
if it's not Avid, Pr or FCx you are doing it wrong
>resolve it's acceptable, it can get the job done but it's more of a color grading tool with editing capabilities than an editor per se

>>387923
I have a medium and its amazing. I looked at a large, but it didn't seem to be suitable for my needs.

>>387948
i was considering the medium initially, but I have a 27 inch screen and I read that the bigger tablet is better for larger screens. Though i honestly dont need much convincing to waste more money.

how do you store yours when not in use? I'm considering ordering straight from wacom and they have a tablet bag available

>>387923
I had a medium one and loved it for a long while. the only downside is not directly drawing onto a screen, but if you don't have the budget for those tablet-esque ones this one is rather decent, specially if you're not paying a lot for them

>>387950
I have a pretty large screen as well, but it partially came down to how much hand/wrist movement you really need in order to render. Even drawing on a huge monitor and a huge file, your hand really only moves around so much while drawing.
For storage, I just put it on my bookshelf life a book. I keep it next to my scanner.

>>388085
>Drawing on the screen
I've used this type, and didn't like it for a few reasons.
1.) takes up a video slot. If you only have 2 or 3 slots, then one of them now can't be an actual monitor.
2.) The feel is all wrong. Drawing on glass is wierd. The tooth of the regular tablet is pretty good naturally, and a sheet of paper over it makes it feel like real paper
3.). After drawing with a tablet for years, I got used to being able to see 100% of the image while I was working on it, and not having my hand in the way.
4.) Cost. They tend to more expensive, heavier, less portable, and more delicate than a Intuos.

>>386823
Thanks! Didn't know Mineral but definitely consider it a compliment!

Well I graduated college last may and I had an internship over the summer. After that I started freelance work from home, so in that regard it hasn't changed my workflow that much. But it feels like I have more competition now that a lot more people are doing it.

what is it for?

>>387955
experimentation, made it out of interest, originally thought would make something skeuomorphic, but ended up with this

>>387954
Icon for what exactly ? windows ? then it's fine
Mobile ? try minimalism, get rid of the shadows, gradient

>>387961
If its mobile the icon itself is way too small for the rounded square frame

>>387744
Find a street shitter to do it

>>387744
fuck you

>>387744
>"Qualified".
>"$11/hr."
Fuck off. You're the problem. Any designer who isn't asking for minimum wage plus 10 is going to be your Photoshop™ starter pack. Little to no experience. Good luck getting the right dimensions, print quality or file types. Save yourself the headache and back and forth, pay more, get better designers, and get better results with little to no issue. Having Photoshop on your computer doesn't make you a designer. Work experience and an actual career based on design does. That's around the time we start making money. Pay us what you owe.

>>387744
ITT: OP wants to pay McDonald's wage for quality design work. xD

this is bait but still kill yourself

>>387976
(Is)

>>387976
unironically reddit, know your meme