[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/gd/ - Graphic Design

Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Additional supported file types are: PDF

05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
06/20/16New 4chan Banner Contest with a chance to win a 4chan Pass! See the contest page for details.
[Hide] [Show All]


[Catalog] [Archive]

are there realtors that specialize in poorfag office space $200-400?
>>
Office space for $400?
Good luck with that
I suggest that you rent out a room instead
>>
just work from home. if you have another employee make them move in with you.
>>
>>391083

just find a climate controlled storage space near you with plugs and dont say anything to them. WALA $40/mo office space

Where do you get your Images from that you can actually use for graphics you want to sell?

I really like the designs of these guys:
https://www.instagram.com/deva_states/

do you have any idea where they get their sources from?
>>
>>390786
Use pixabay bro . I do and a guy contacted me for buying my design on Instagram.
>>
>>390818
Second that. There are a few decent royalty free sites, but pixabay has some vectors, high res photos, and they're accumulating video clips too.

File: 61e0Xs-7lhL._AC_SL1500_.jpg (65 KB, 1367x876)
65 KB
65 KB JPG
do wacom screen tablets (namely the wacom one) need a screen protector? Are they really made to Withstand years of rubbing with a stylus without scratching? Or do people just accept scratches?


any recommended brand of screen protector? with minimal distortion and cloudiness, and a toothy feel

Google uses this particular style of illustration a lot, does it have a name? How do i destroy it?
54 replies and 8 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>385101
>>385361
>>385904
>>386917
>>387604
wow, responding to incredibly lazy bait leads to many people defending it, how far we've fallen
>>
>>385067
41 yourself
>>
File: 3112200801025.jpg (387 KB, 800x600)
387 KB
387 KB JPG
reminds me of the baskin robbins wall art. i hate it.
>>
>>389215
>Saying all users on this site are retards
>Haha america bad I'm so original
Redditfag
>>
>>385014
yeah, its called "shit"

File: IMG_5884.jpg (454 KB, 1400x2100)
454 KB
454 KB JPG
A studio recently reached out to buy my typeface, for a redesign of a public park and will be using my typeface for the logo. (Meaning that the logo will be on their website which has around 10k visits per month and will painted in big letters on a wall in the park, as well as on the letterhead and paper etc.) Any idea what to do? What to charge? How to write a license myself etc.
>>
>>391063
go ask on typography forums dumbass, give more details and compare answers before taking a decision
https://graphicdesignforum.com/c/typography/10

hey, a few months ago i stumbled on a thread here asking how to make the effect in pic related, i had the following in a text file:

>Add text and leave it as top layer
>Duplicate layer: highlights
>Make it white
>Duplicate layer: shadows
>Make it black
>Move highlights to the left
>Move shadows to the right
>Apply a lot of blur to both highlights and shadows.
>Use masks in the original layer on the inside of the 'B' etc.

but i'm not sure if im doing this correctly in photoshop, can someone explain further?
>>
>>391050
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lL09RZaaBLY
>>
>>391051
ah bummer, i though it was possible to do on photoshop, but thanks for answering
>>
>>391052
technically you can but the amount of work will be insane and exhausting

File: 123123123.png (710 KB, 1083x771)
710 KB
710 KB PNG
What is this style called?
Video as an example. You have simple 3D objects, with no textures but with simple hard shadows.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEXoCcxwH4Y
4 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
it's just wind waker styled cel shading
>>
>>391023
Only one L
Since the name comes from the transparent cels used in traditional animation
>>
You will probably enjoy Killer7 too
>>
>>391030
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQYggzXYB6A
>>
>>391018
It's called "lazy 48-hour game entry #4803"

what sites do you get inspo from?. Pic related is my work need help finding similar aesth...
20 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
I get inspired from Behance

take a look at some of my work!

https://www.behance.net/-danielsnow
>>
>>390335
Sounds to me like you're a touchy faggot.
>>
www.are.na is nice for design boards
>>
http://www.are.na is nice for design boards
>>
This thread sucks ass, anyways i get inspiration from the things i see in my daily life because art is about expressing an idea, that's what seperates artists from designers for the sake of design

File: pocatello (old).png (638 KB, 985x657)
638 KB
638 KB PNG
Is there any better definition of soul / soulless than when they changed Pocatello's flag?
>>
File: pocatello (new).png (109 KB, 3724x2234)
109 KB
109 KB PNG
>>390961
>>
>>390962
bad flag
>>390961
not even close to a flag

File: IMG_20200527_170052.jpg (384 KB, 3840x2160)
384 KB
384 KB JPG
Is it worth spending $99?
4 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>388712
It looks like he is hosting them on YouTube. Could you drop a link to a course recap if he has one? Or just the course intro? ain't gonna buy but wanna see how bad it is.
>>
>>388681
yeah, i'd say a "course" that talks about "visualizing value" like its not a completely made up buzzword with no actual meaning is totally worth spending 100 fucking dollars on.
no you retard i guarantee you all the videos are him throwing up fancy flow charts about "profit" and "value" and saying big words to make himself sound like he knows what he's talking about.
do people seriously pay for this shit? what a load of garbage
>>
>>388686
still makes me laugh
>>
>>388681
>>learn to write
>>learn to speak/present
the course
>>
How do you make such good looking screenshots?

File: eyes n decors 01 o.jpg (31 KB, 319x687)
31 KB
31 KB JPG
not advocating for tagging buildings or vehicles, but I'd like to see some photos of graffiti you like, or your own recreations of them. so I can get a look at how they were drawn. Images made out of text lines. Something.

Post your pictos, glyphs, symbols, artsy texts or graphics.

File: kiki_4.3.3_sm.png (973 KB, 1280x640)
973 KB
973 KB PNG
For those who are still living under a rock, this is the Ultimate FOSS Alternative to Photoshop (unlike GIMP, it's actually Good).

4.3 adds a lot of new features, and I need you guys to tell me how good they really are.

>The Program:
https://krita.org/en/download/krita-desktop/
>Release Notes:
https://krita.org/en/krita-4-3-release-notes/
>Android Tab/ChromeOS beta:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.krita

File: maxresdefault.jpg (53 KB, 1280x720)
53 KB
53 KB JPG
Have you tried affinity photo? is it better or does it have something that Ps doesn't?

So far I've only tried the selection tools, which apart from the select outline option, seem to be a little worse than Photoshop's
>>
File: Ps vs Affinity Selection.png (939 KB, 1600x1800)
939 KB
939 KB PNG
Here's how I compared them, top is Ps and bot is Affinity Photo
I selected the background of an image with the wand and deleted it, in Ps I used the expand selection feature by 1 px, however affinity only has the grow selection option, and using with 1 px too the result is worse than Ps (sure my selection in Ps can still be better but this was just a quick 1 min edit for comparison) As you can see, the edges around the Ps edit are much better, both images are at 100% zoom so there are no pixel shenenigans going on. I also tried growing the selection by 2 px and using 1 - 2px of feather but none look as good as Ps.

Also when making this image with affinity I noticed the move tool is better here, as it gives you information like by how many pixels layers overlap and other things.

In what other areas is affinity photo worse or better? or is there perhaps a better way to select with affinity?
>>
File: 1590837626053.jpg (98 KB, 1000x1415)
98 KB
98 KB JPG
>>390837
I use Affinity for everything, if you know how to design you can do it with anything. Affinity is a once time purchase and isn't bloatware botnet like CC, fucking aids
>>
>>390838
In Photo you have to click "Refine", then you fine tune the feather and the smoothing. You can also mask the foreground and background. I haven't used PS in years but you can achieve the very same results in photo.

File: IMG_20200613_044215_942.jpg (274 KB, 2248x2248)
274 KB
274 KB JPG
What are your criticisms of this emblem I have made for the organization called, The Pact.
>>
>>390954
It looks like the spiderman venom mask from the thumbnail, the sword is hard to see, there's a disconnection between the all the shapes, also there's some lines inside the shapes that are too thin to be noticed and make the design look amateur maybe just make some sketches on paper iterate and refine before jumping into the software you're using.
>>
>>390954
Cringe pseudo-heraldry
If you want to use heraldry, do it properly, make it blazonable, follow the rules etc
If you want a seal or something, do that properly
But don't use shit like this that fails to be either one

File: greenfroglookingatyou.jpg (58 KB, 976x850)
58 KB
58 KB JPG
share your pepe art
>>
>>390903
You first.
>>
wat du u tink gueys
>>
File: 1589157630498.jpg (266 KB, 723x960)
266 KB
266 KB JPG


Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.