[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math

4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Use with [math] tags for inline and [eqn] tags for block equations.
  • Right-click equations to view the source.

05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
06/20/16New 4chan Banner Contest with a chance to win a 4chan Pass! See the contest page for details.
[Hide] [Show All]

[Catalog] [Archive]

File: sciguide.jpg (9 KB, 200x140)
9 KB
Reminder: /sci/ is for discussing topics pertaining to science and mathematics, not for helping you with your homework or helping you figure out your career path.

If you want advice regarding college/university or your career path, go to /adv/ - Advice.

If you want help with your homework, go to /wsr/ - Worksafe Requests.

File: lsd-1551743013.jpg (25 KB, 480x479)
25 KB
Can LSD help you eventually find the solution to a math/science problem?
17 replies and 3 images omitted. Click here to view.
File: Drugs Venn Diagram.gif (52 KB, 962x711)
52 KB
LSD gave me temporary dyslexia that wouldn't go away even if I closed my eyes like most hallicinations usually do. It scrambled the text on my screen and made it MUCH harder to read. I later met a family that has at least 3 members with dyslexic systems and one who straight up told me she was diagnosed with dyslexia. I told her about my dyslexia symptoms and she said that's pretty much how dyslexia is. All from putting a white piece of paper on my tongue I got off the deep web. (It was seven years ago faggots. Statue of limitations, I can legally brag about my old crimes bitch.)
you sound underaged or just immature in general
I'm 24 years of age.
LSD helps with creativity, but I'm not sure if it would help with logical/abstract reasoning

List of elementary, settled facts, physics edition:

> Nature is inherently continuous. Discrete theories or theories based on cellular automata-like or pixel-like concepts are blatant pseudoscience.
> Nature is inherently stochastic/probabilistic/random. Deterministic theories are demonstrably false. Probabilities is all that we can predict, and this is not just due to our lack of knowledge or precision, but it is fundamental.
> Nature is inherently local. No faster than light transfer of information or any other effects is possible.
> Nature is inherently non-realist. We cannot speak meaningfully of the definiteness of the results of measurements that have not been performed. An observer (not to be conflated with conscious beings) is a basic requirement in quantum mechanics.
> "Interpretations of quantum mechanics" are overwhelmingly pseudoscience. But as much as some of them can be said to be correct, it is Copenhagen or it's upgrade, Consistent (Decoherent) Histories.
> String Theory is very likely the correct general approach for the theory of high energy quantum gravity (and also other forces, otherwise known as the Theory of Everything).
> Cosmic Inflation is likely the actual mechanism behind The Big Bang.
> Conservation of Energy is just a good low energy approximation. Conservation of energy does not globally hold in General Relativity. It is also globally glossly violated in the presence of Inflation, and possibly violated in quantum gravity regime. And there is nothing wrong with this. Also, this does not mean various "free energy" concepts are any less of a crackpottery.

Some of these statements may seem controversial to laymen or even subpar physicists. They are not controversial among actually competent researchers at all.

Thank you for listening.
128 replies and 10 images omitted. Click here to view.
>Quantum physics makes assumptions which are more consistent with realit
So the first statement of OP is debatable? Right?
The OP is a bait post, obviously. It's a common opinion among physicists, based on assuming that modern physical theories are the most accurate representation of reality we have (which IMO is a good assumption), but it is an opinion, not a fact.
Continuous nature means that there's no precision limit. Quantization is on a continuous spectrum, see Zeeman effect.
Yes, that's right. Wasn't sure what the anon you're replying to meant.
It's a characteristic threshold. Planck length is wave length of a photon equal to its schwarzschild radius. Similar how Planck constant is a characteristic threshold for quantum effects.

File: mars 2.jpg (186 KB, 1000x683)
186 KB
186 KB JPG
previous >>11078008
154 replies and 40 images omitted. Click here to view.
>Eeeeeh kys racist
>Eeeeeh kys cupcake
Pick one.
Did Reality seem Ramsey “Infinitely Better Than Reality”?
>Mars Attack Vehicle
Did Reality deem Ramsey Infinitely Better Than Reality?

File: 1469958315531.jpg (195 KB, 1920x1080)
195 KB
195 KB JPG
Is wildberger the most rigorous mathematician alive ?
30 replies and 7 images omitted. Click here to view.
no idea
damn, that's a shame. this is a very simple and commonly encountered problem!
>while referencing the number system itself

Is he a moron?
>Simple and legitimate problem is posed
>Can't even respond without resorting to insults and obfuscating the question
This is what cognitive dissonance looks like
The semantics of the number referenced by the symbol "1" can be considered valid under any base, so it's not really an issue here.

File: IMG_20191011_131046.jpg (11 KB, 320x320)
11 KB
118 replies and 13 images omitted. Click here to view.
>Math 55 at Harvard is the hardest math class ever made and it's calculus.
Math 55 is LA, Real & Complex Analysis, Group Theory, Topology and some other topic depending on who's teaching the class.
I think I nearly failed precalculus once as a sophomore in high school, but even then it was like only a C- not technically failing. I had to kick it into gear when I did Calculus my Junior year of HS. Why are you even taking these in College, it is meant for children in high school. When you arrive at college you shouldn't be doing Calc at all. Maybe multivariable calc would be reasonable but they offered that in HS as well so it is still kind of cringe to be taking courses like this at Uni.
>going to a tutor or office hours makes me feel like a retard
You’re never going to make it. It has nothing to do with your intellectual capabilities. It has to do with your character. I went to office hours from calc 1 to algebraic topology. Lose your shame and ask your questions
Pajeets are smart, especially American born south Asians, and represented in stem because of particular cultural pushes. It’s that they’re mixed in with not so smart people, just like any other population

File: 1469959742166.jpg (168 KB, 1920x1080)
168 KB
168 KB JPG
Is it any good for self-studying?
2 replies omitted. Click here to view.
The cross section is circular, is what I meant. So how long?
You're overcomplicating stuff. Here's a much simpler problem also unsolvable in Wildberger fairy world: What is the area of a circle?
what is the exact ratio of this circular cross section's diameter to its circumference?
Well, it's a circle. You tell me. You are the mathematician. I am an engineer who needs to solve practical problems.

Rationalists be like:
>Calculate the mass!
Empiricists be like:
>Measure the mass!
Rational Empiricists be like:
>Calculate the mass, then measure it!
Which school of thought do you think your field falls nearer to?
I'd say that mathematicians, computer scientists, and physicists are nearer to rationalists.
Whereas, chemists, engineers, and biologists are nearer to empiricism.
Of course, few people are either of the three archetypes.
Rationalists won, the science is settled.
But they didn't. The very fact that we require experimental for the scientific method disputes that.
The science is settled.
Experimental data, that is.

/mg/ - mathematics general
John Tate edition
119 replies and 19 images omitted. Click here to view.
Try using physics in module theory!
They're mostly of interest to CS people, yes.
Being born male and female is completely random! Honk honk.
Infinite I could have been movies now.
File: stina.jpg (49 KB, 613x771)
49 KB
How about

Also that woman which did work on brigdes and had this controvery some years ago, I think she went in that direction.
Just search for "classifying" on nLab, or maybe moduli space.
I mean I suppose all things Teichmüller also go in that direction, and the Japanese guy does a "big theory" of this. Although it may be too arithmetical for you.

I'd also like to know more about it btw.

I think I wrote the bulk of the catamorphism Wikipedia article years ago. On that not, look at F-algebras and the general theory of formal arithmetic of types.
If you're explicit about your bijections, you can do cool stuff like "taking the square root" of data types X (that is to say, give concrete meaning to power series of stuff like X^(1/2) or 1/(X+1))
On that note again, there's a recent cool set of talk slides by Bauer on explicit bijections in combinatorics and the question what they should be (and he's shilling dependent types and hott)


File: 1571607070450m.jpg (88 KB, 640x1024)
88 KB
What are the future implications of this?
55 replies and 7 images omitted. Click here to view.
>t. :^)
Hackers hacking their mark of the beast into a skeleton key, deranged surgeons filling the capsole with ricin and a small bit of black powder to create a pushbutton killswitch of the cattle doesn't want to work any more, or just good ol fashioned cattle tracking to make sure the Human cattle is within the bluetooth range of their bluetooth lighthouse like a good servant.

Now take your pressed white powder pill and don't question your shadow governments methods or you can be replaced like so many people like you have before you when they questioned our methods.
Elon Musk's neurochip

Why no just a ring? What the fuck is the point of injecting it inside your body?
We would tag your ear like a cow or sheep or pig if we thought we could get away with it.

Don't be the only one without your implanted keycard OP. You wouldn't want to get locked out of your own home when upper management decides to switch from analog locks to digital locks...

It's amazing how rapidly a democracy can slide into despotism when all dissenting optionions can be handwaved away as "Outdated" and "Backwards thinking".

File: laser.gif (2.97 MB, 353x218)
2.97 MB
2.97 MB GIF
Will science ever make this type of thing possible?
5 replies omitted. Click here to view.
french girls like negros more than french men
Why didn't she just shoot the door?
That would be too easy now wouldn't it?
you need 2 beams retard

Can anyone explain wtf this means?

18 replies and 6 images omitted. Click here to view.
Quantum computers will b pretty big impact

bye bye encryption
I don't think one of the richest companies on the planet needs to farm some paltry grant money
>when people think of a computer they think of a phone, or a laptop
Kill me now. The first computer I ever interacted with was a proper computer, a desktop.
you gotta check 2^256 solutions to brute force a 256-bit hash.

to accomplish 10,000 years worth of compute time in 3 seconds shaves off ten zeroes from that figure.

so google's new computer can brute force with 100% certainty in the time it'd take IBM's supercomputer to check 2^246 solutions.

i wouldn't worry. encryption is safe.
The comments section of pure cancer, people acting like quantum computing and sentient AIs are the same thing. I just wish people would stop telling the stupids about STEM.

File: file.png (1.57 MB, 1000x1333)
1.57 MB
1.57 MB PNG
/sci/-approved cures for chronic anxiety?
22 replies omitted. Click here to view.
Solve all the problems that make you anxious.
So. Anxiety cures. Anyone?
File: 1569934341816.png (114 KB, 500x387)
114 KB
114 KB PNG

File: schizo.jpg (193 KB, 1877x1062)
193 KB
193 KB JPG
Can you tell if somebody has schizophrenia just by looking at their face?
65 replies and 5 images omitted. Click here to view.

the joke is..

can you get away with living a hedonistic lifestyle, like they do.

that is the joke.

ha. ha.

not sure If you can tell from the face

we do stare at things I think its the mannerisms

When I look at things my mind tends to extrapolate the information received to an extreme degree. the thoughts go on multiple axis. like it goes everywhere all at once. never thought this as a mental illness I thought this shit was normal. just an amplified thought pattern. you guys treat this as a stigma. they get scared because you feed them bad information.
What kind of brainlet would pick chicken/cow, egg/milk instead of chicken/egg, cow/milk?
why do you define it primarily as an analytic ability rather than a social disability?

if you think analytic and social abilities are necessarily inversely correlated, how do you explain people who are both socially and analytically competent?
Are you calling me autistic you fucking schizo freak?

File: 1569025739031.jpg (278 KB, 1178x744)
278 KB
278 KB JPG
First picture: A woman.
How common are women in Chemistry?
7 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
Imagine not one person posting any fucking stats:
>Picture related
File: major_and_iq_2.png (1.75 MB, 869x3565)
1.75 MB
1.75 MB PNG
Also, to help you locate where chemistry would be:
>Picture related
As you can see, for fields of that nature, around 25% to less, nearer 5-10% for engineering fields, including chemical engineering.
File: 1502166523873.jpg (44 KB, 657x527)
44 KB
nice work
Fyi, the primary source of those stats (not the infographics) are from:
The infographics just make it more interesting to look at.

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.