[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tg/ - Traditional Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Who mogs
>>
>>92624808
>top
-women
+stupid hats
>bottom
+no women
-no stupid hats
It's impossible to say.
>>
>>92624808
>>92624995
Square Bases > Round Bases
>>
I just don't like realistic scale, I want those big hands and those Farquaad heads, it looks so much better every time
>>
>>92625645
I feel the same about the Darkest Dungeons 2 characters. The originals looked like minis, and the (dis)proportions work in their favour.
>>
Top looks like heroic fantasy warriors prepared to take on foul monsters and win. Bottom looks like generic fucking knights, the kind that they show in the movies getting killed off like red shirts to demonstrate how powerful and dangerous the BBEG is before the real hero’s (top image) come in and save the day
>>
>>92624808
Both are horribly sculpted.
>>
>>92624808
Neither, not elves, therefore both are shit
>>
>top
+sovlful dumb helmets
+cool thematic banner
-sovlless dumbass shields that are a pain in the fucking ass to fix
-can be built with a w*man
>bottom
+cooler weapons
+better shields
+better poses
-mail instead of pl8
-no dumb helmets
-boring tiny banner
>>
>>92624808
kitbash them and mog both.
>>
>>92624808
What do the locks on the banner represent? Defeated chastity belts of grail maidens?
>>
>>92624808
Why are they not on their horses? Are they stupid?
>>
File: 20240424_131500.jpg (1.59 MB, 2400x1800)
1.59 MB
1.59 MB JPG
>>92624808
I built a box of the top pic this week and I'm already debating picking up a second. Went together great, fun to build, surprisingly customisable
>>
File: decoratedfullhelm.png (415 KB, 790x484)
415 KB
415 KB PNG
>>92624808
The top have soulful helmets and the bottom are so bland I forget what they look like as soon as I stop looking at them
>>92634705
The only thing that stops me buying this kit is they modelled faces inside the visor slits when I just want a black shadow
>>
>>92627608
Lmao
cope is hilarious
>>
File: images (13).jpg (24 KB, 465x599)
24 KB
24 KB JPG
>>92634705
damn they look shit
have these sculptors every seen feet? how the fuck do you sculpt feet as long as the thigh or bottom leg half?
>>
Consider the adjoining
>>
>>92634869
Just paint the inside of the slit black. How is this a problem?
>>
>>92636117
You'll be able to see the lump of the nose still
>>
>>92636255
Then take a small file to it and scrape it off. I'm starting to see your point about not wanting to do that, though.
>>
>>92636255
Green stuff is not that expensive, just fill it in
Besides, you wont see it unless you look at it up close
>>
>>92634705
>Literally just sigmarines with giant metal bibs and goofy helmets
Lol...
>>
>>92635963
These are great to practice painting on.
>>
>>92624808
Honestly I'm gonna go with the Wargames Atlantic knights. They are just agnostic looking enough to be painted and utilized for fantasy and historical games/dioramas and I like that.
>>
>>92624808
The early 12th century knights are better. The (nu) Bretonnians are ruined by the bibs. The chunky shields are also dumb. Overall, they're over-designed, like most GW shit. Also,
>she-knight
>>
>>92628140
this



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.