If IQ is 50-80% genetic and IQ has no relationship with race, then why is there still such a huge gap in things like test scores? Is education racist?
To put these scores into context, the Asian average is about the 78%ile, white is at 58th, hispanic is at 37th and black is at 30th. That's a pretty extreme difference.
Because SAT is a systemically racist system designed by white guys. Black folx should have an alternate easier system.
>>16165326SAT measures knowledge, not IQ. Before 1994 it was intelligence based but now it is about high school trivia. Same with the ACT and more recently, the GRE.
>>16165326The smartest person in this data could be black though. That's the problem with presenting it in a simplistic way like this
>>16165482Ideally, a college student should have both IQ and conscientiousness.
>>16165326>Natives score just as low or even lower than Blacks, but no one cares>Natives receive tens of billions of tax dollars annually from the government, but no one cares>Natives get special privileges in education and hiring, but no one cares>Natives commit crimes at the same rates as Blacks or higher relative to their population, but no one cares>Natives have children out of wedlock at the same right or even higher than blacks, but no one caresThis is how you know people that ask these sorts of questions are dishonest.
>>16165512brown iq detected
>>16165326>is 50-80% geneticit's >90% retard
>>16165904I would gladly keep paying bix nood tax if they were all sequestered far away to reservations and were completely out of sight/mind like the tee-pee-creepies.
>>16165328Human genes >>> negroid genes.Simple as.
>>16165512
>>16165326Asian students would get an epic beatdown if they brought home report cards that weren't loaded with straight As.
