>Scientists tried to give people COVID — and failed>Researchers deliberately infect participants with SARS-CoV-2 in ‘challenge’ trials — but high levels of immunity complicate efforts to test vaccines and treatments.https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01284-1How do you feel about the fact that you took a dangerous, untested experimental medication in order to prevent a nonexistent viral epidemic? Do you feel foolish, gullible & low IQ?
>>16164491uh oh germ theory bros. Its the spanish flu tests all over again. also uh oh Jew bros, history is repeating itself.
>>16164491wait for the new variant.
>>16164520k
Did they try proving transmission using intentionally faked PCR test results? Thats the only way Covid infection has ever been proved in the past.
>>16164491my uncle died of covid so, yeah covid is real and hope you are the next victim
>>16164491>How do you feel about the fact that you took a dangerous, untested experimental medication in order to prevent a nonexistent viral epidemic?that's not what the conclusion here is, you dimwit, lol.
>>16164491Good news. When does science pay me a refund for my years of lockdown over a nonexistent viral epidemic?
>>16164984The CIA killed your uncle.
>>16164491anon it says so in your article that they failed because of the level of immunity people haveprobably due to vaccines
>>16166687*Boeing
>>16164491You can thank Omicron for this. Everyone seems to forget that, after the mRNA therapies were launched en masse, the world kept sustaining wave after wave of new variants which each tore through entire populations. It wasn't until the Omicron wave swept the planet and a critical mass of people acquired strong natural immunity that Covid fizzled out to an endemic respiratory nuisance like colds or seasonal flus.Thank you omicron!
>>16166671Good pic, but midwits are still too egotistical and full of themselves to admit they were tricked by a big media hoax
>>16164491>Do you feel foolish, gullible & low IQ?No. I know absolutely nothing of infections, vaccines, and epidemiology. I spent my life studying and practicing something completely different. So if 99% of our doctors agreed that it was appropriate (and they did), I did the right thing in taking it.
>>16164491>Covid is not infectious in humansbecause it never existed to begin with
>>16168606not the first time an epidemic has been faked in order to sell vaccines https://www.forbes.com/2010/03/10/swine-flu-world-health-organization-pandemic-opinions-contributors-henry-i-miller.html
>>16164984Bots don't have uncles
>>16166909>probablySounds like a baseless assumption
>>16164491>high levels of immunityDid something happen to cause that
>>16170037the disease was never infectious in humans, if it had been then all the unvaccinated would've been wiped out
You guys are so dumb The study used droplets instead of aerosols.Sars2 is a virus spreads via aerosols, not heavy droplets. It needs to be aerosolised to be inhaled to reach the cribiform or the lungs. All this does is it proves what everyone already knew: respirators, not surgical masks, are the appropriate protection. Spread via contaminated surfaces was debunked long ago.They lied to you about droplets and handwashing while the who was upgrading their air filtration systems in 2020... it is AEROSOL, just like all know coronas (and flu, and tb etc) the rest is nonsensical stuff to make you feel safer. Only air filtration works
>>16170648muh dick
>>16170508I don't think your conclusion follows from the premises
>>16170832You're clearly wrong about that, if covid was a deadly disease and the vaccine was an effective preventative measure then the unvaccinated would've been wiped out. Instead its only the vaccinated who suffered
>How do you feel about the fact that you took a dangerous, untested experimental medication in order to prevent a nonexistent viral epidemic?
>>16171709>Instead its only the vaccinated who sufferedgoodTVD
>>16164491>Raising doses>Researchers are looking at other ways to give people COVID-19. Jackson says that an even higher SARS-CoV-2 dose might be needed they can't even figure out how to infect ppl with covid on purpose and ppl took a vaccine for this disease
>>16166909>anon it says so in your article that they failed because of the level of immunity people have>probably due to vaccinesWierd that during the "Coof hysteria" all the vaxxed got """covid""" thrice and coincidentally temporally related to their booster they recently recieved. Wierd that they never do such an "experiment" while obeying the scientific method, by doing a Controll group. In this case "a group of unvaxxed. It's odd that people get the coof but not when exposed to the alleged causal agent. Could it be, maybe that: >coof was a unspecific collection of symptoms>including not having any symptom>therefore everything became the CovidAnd vaccination was nothing but a sort of poisoning which elicited the default mechanisms of detoxification and excretion of toxic or pathogenic material:>diahrrea>vomiting>fever>coughing>runny nose>simply excreting and eliminating shit>elimination process vaguely defined as covid
>>16164491https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3_3mkUamVI
>>16174932Most people are too low IQ to have critical thinking capabilities, so they just took the vax because TV told them to.
>>16176511same reason they all have ""smart"" phones, its those phones that are their primary media manipulator these days, TV seems to have become a secondary mind control method, but they only got the phone to begin with because TV told them to
>>16171709>if covid was a deadly disease and the vaccine was an effective preventative measure then the unvaccinated would've been wiped out.Nope, still doesn't follow>Instead its only the vaccinated who sufferedThis is also just plain wrong
>>16177677
>>16175189>It's odd that people get the coof but not when exposed to the alleged causal agent.That seems repeatable and virus theory is disproved long ago. >>16175189>And vaccination was nothing but a sort of poisoning which elicited the default mechanisms of detoxification and excretion of toxic or pathogenic material:Flu looks like a body reaction, but what causes the traceable "infection chains". Pure misunderstanding / misinterpretation?
>>16177677>Nope, still doesn't followyes it does
>>16178220>traceable "infection chains"this is literally a meme. What it means is: >similar place>similar time>similar symptomsWith the bonus>symptoms are not even required anymore>or can be obscure meme diseases such as "restless anal syndrome">picrelThere is a list of things that can cause this observation, that are not the principle of "host to host transmission via a nanoscopic replication competent non living organism".Let me name a few: 1. common exposure to a poisoneg. Food poisoning:>similar place>similar time>similar symptomsOther types of poisoning or contamination via things like bad air quality may cause the same observation of presentations of events2. psycholocial fear mongering eg. News telling you every day "You will get sick with xy symptoms and everyone will die">susceptible group will psychosomaticly get sick out of fear3. psychological stresseg. News telling you every day "You will get sick with xy symptoms and everyone will die">sensible group will be stressed which makes sick4. Presumtive interpretation and ripple effect force testing>one person gets sick>do a non specific, non calibrated, never validated test >subsequently force every associated person to also get tested, with a non specific test>disregard the absence of any clinical presentation of symptoms>disregard "false postives" and label them as asymptomatics>by pure statistical probability you will get "positive" yet meaningless results>interprete these results as a "chain of events"The greatest meme is that it just was passed to disassociate clinical symptoms from a disease, hence making diagnostics a useless meme
>>16167987lol, the immune system is a conspiracy theory now according to "the science"
>>16170648>Sars2 is a virus spreads via aerosolshow do you know that?
>>16166909>>16170037>>16167608>high levels of immunityNeither vaccines nor natural immunity last that long.Most likely: ending mask mandates boosted immunity through micro-exposure.
>>16181162>Most likely: ending mask mandates boosted immunity through micro-exposure.So, natural immunity?
>>16181162How do ypExplain how you get a lot of diseases only once with that bullshit
>>16182057>be child grow and changes in body happend>body adjusts to environment >some hormone fuckery happens>get skin rash as a child>nobody can explain why>make up shit about non specific type of skin rash is a actually a "disease">call it "childhood disease">become adult>not getting childhood disease anymore>woah you must be immune now, because you got this once>what about the flu? >nah your body forgets this shitPeople literally believe in the esotheric concept of the "immune system" even though it contradicts itself multiple times in various scenarios, and not a single "immune therapy" or medical product based on "antibodies" ever worked.
