What kinds of genes are currently being selected for in humanity? I notice that none of the educated professionals in their mid-30s around me have more than 1 child. From surveys, the more educated and higher income have less kids. The poorest and less educated have the most kids. Religious groups have a lot of kids, my neighbors growing up were some weird Christian sect and they had 11 kids. The most technologically advanced people, Japanese and South Koreans are having no kids and their population will collapse soon. I'm evolutionary terms what's happening to the species?
>>16147838>>/pol/
>>16147844It's an evolutionary biology question
>>16147854you're /pol/shilling through your teeth.>muh jewish fairy tale tards are breeding>muh idealized asian waifu's aren't breeding>muh catabolic collapse.Fuck off.
religions are eugenic vehicles those that embody the ideals of the religion tend to reproduce morefirst you must identify the religion and its ideals
>>16147838>I'm evolutionary terms what's happening to the species?Brown religious low-IQ conservatives do all the breeding, so that's what's in future for humanity.
>>16147871>the future is conservative
The social ones. So everything is working as intended.
Self-awareness is being rolled back
>>16147838> What kinds of genes are currently being selected for in humanity? Blackest gorilla niggers with an IQ of 60In next 100 years or so Whites and East Asians will be extinct.>>16147884There is no "future"
>>16147838>in evolutionary terms what's happening to the species?It's called a Market Correction, certain traits were overvalued too much and couldn't sustain the inflation of worth. Thus thier prevalence is decreasing. What good is everyone having a +100 IQ and/or College Degree if the ecosystem can't support them? So you're smart enough to pass a hundred exams and graduate college but can't get a job paying you more than a 90IQ Trash Man or Truck Driver? And you can't afford to do better than the Trash Man or Truck Driver in terms of buying a home and raise children?What was the point of wasting energy propagating those genes capable of higher IQ and education when you're no better than a mid IQ and education?
>>16147838retards, except the elite who are practicing eugenics and genetically engineering themselves >in 200 years the world will be burnt out wasteland populated by freaks mutated by intergenerational drug addiction and pollution, with only some roving warbands and free villages full of hardass survivalists outside of the dome cities full of elites and their VR headset wearing mindcontrolled slaves >unless things change
Low IQ is being selected for. The world will be a 80IQ avg dystopia akin to Pakistan soon.
disgenic.it's all downhill from here for society.china was right.
>>16149113What was China right about?Did they protect themselves from dysgenics?
>>16149142china got dysgenic communisted decades ago
>>16147838ever wonder why we don't live in Star Trek yet?
>>16149171>1024x1024Is the tiny image part of your joke?
>>16147838Yes, we are becoming dumber due to our environment. Why? Because there are too many high IQ people on the planet and not enough high IQ jobs. At some point we'll reach an equilibrium.
>>16149208No, it's probably because of over education destroying intelligence
>>16149210That's the same thing. Too many 110 IQs, too few 160 IQs.It's like how Asians have higher IQs on average than whites, but a lower standard deviation, and they have the lowest fertility on the planet, along with a massive oversupply of postgraduates.
>>16149142china is extremely racist and is implementing eugenics. they even have designer babies.in fact, if you were ever in a communist propaganda class like me, you will realize that the concept of "communist person" they are teaching sounds eerily eugenic.
>>16149221So years ago I read some blog with some guy talking about how society depends on the proportion of the population that could be trained in technically complex fields like plumbing I think his cutoff was approx 106.See the 160 are rare no matter how smart your population is but if your population iq average drops by 1 point then that's actually quite vast number of competent people vanishing.I feel like your idea of tighter sd among asians makes sense with this since they will have more of these technical classes but fewer of the innovative genius rangesAlthough I think our societies typically stratified with elite groups outside of the masses such as priests or artisans.
>>16149229china was dysgenic for a long timebut as china does they take western ideas and implement them on mass, they came across national socialsm
>>16149221>Asians have higher IQs on average than whites, but a lower standard deviationthis isn't true. asians are not a homogeneuos group. in fact, just in china itself they have 50+ separate groups of human with different intelligence capablities. the ones in rural and moutainous china are dumber than the general population with an average IQ of 85-90 or so while the more selective group of chinese get many 140+ IQ. it's just china is so vast with 1.5 billion people you sum them up you get the blurred out average results.the highest IQ in the world is terry tao who is a chinese ancestry.
>>16147838Watch idiocracy/thread
>>16149235agree that they have been in dysgenic in a long time, possibly for a thousand of year. the last han dynasty was the Ming dynasty after that was the Qing who actively discrminated against the han.in fact, china has been in a downward trend since the tang dynasty when they was like half the world population and was centuries ahead of everyone else.I guess implementing strict confucianisms and rule of the first born to quell down rebellions has its consequences.
>>16149244From what I remember China got taken over by jewish financial interests who used northern barbarians to destroy the people claiming some book that taught people to make weapons was anti barbarianI think there was a book "the history of the jews in china"
>>16149252I doubt that Judaism had any significant effects on china. The ruling chinks are more jewish than jews.Even Islam cannot survive as its original form in China.
>>16149266found a copy though I never read it only a summary
>>16149274read it and share with us what you find anon
>>16149286From the guy I remember talking about it supposedly they ran huge brothels and bought up temples and turned those into brothels
>>16149289https://odysee.com/@Leteo:a/How-Jews-Destroyed-China--how-jews-destroyed-china-:d
>>16149302lol is any of that is real?
