Roald Dahl is a fucking moron
>>23321965even fags like him are based by today's standards
>>23321965ugly cope
>>23321965>t. Ugly Thoughts haver
>>23321965bottom is a 10/10 in bongland
>>23321965do you not understand this?
He's right. You just have ugly thoughts
>>23322031Disgusting
>>23321965racist
>>23321965You type like an ugly person anon, better clean up those thoughts.
>>23321965Cope
>>23321965hes right. ugly people are ugly because they lack charisma and walk around with a dick on their shoulder all the time
>>23321965physiognomy is real but we call it by different names
>>23321965OP here, I misspelt moron as "extremely correct individual"
>>23321965Congratulations OP, you successfully debunked a quote written by a children's book author made to promote positive thoughts to children. Truly a masterwork of intellect. What's next, are you going to disprove the existence of Santa Claus?
>>23321965It's true no matter how much you cope, bad thought haver.>All that we are is the result of what we have thought: it is founded on our thoughts, it is made up of our thoughts.
>>23321965That image is literally true. Enjoy getting even more ugly as the years role on.
>>23321971>>23322696Stopped clocks are right twice a day. Dahl embodies the worst of the English character, snotty classicism, a hatred directed towards all upward striving, sadistic glee in seeing anyone who disagrees with you punished.
>>23321965What book is this from? I've never read anything by Dahl, so I'm wondering where to start.
I don't care about being "lovely", I only want the kind of look that makes women want to sleep with me, anything else is pointless.
>>23321965Nah that's true. You just can't understand because you are an ugly thought pleb
>>23322243I have it on good authority that Santa "Fat Bags" Claus was present in Dealey Plaza on that fateful day
>>23321965Completely wrong.Ugliness comes from bad oral posture. Widen your palate, fix your bite, keep your fucking mouth shut properly and breathe through your nose.Then you can have whatever thoughts you want.
>>23321965ugly hands typed and posted this
>>23322709All that is based wdym
>>23323164You can be ugly even with a good jaw and chin.
>>23321965>it's another jew hating Dahl thread Be gone, kike
>>23322713The Twits. > I'm wondering where to start.I don't think it matters. Maybe Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. I remember really liking his autobiographies when I was in 5th grade, so you could check those out. They probably hold up a lot better than his children's books, but I haven't read anything by Dahl since 5th grade so I couldn't really tell you.
>>23321965It's true. Althoughever, people don't deserve my sunbeamy face, so I reserve my good thoughts for when I'm by myself.
>>23321965Quick: buy physical copies of his books before they're all burned by leftists.
>Roald Dahl is a fucking moron
>>23321965ugly hands typed this
>>23324091me in the lower half :)
>>23324100:)
>>23324091me on the upper half >:[
>>23324121D:<
>>23324121that squirrel is NUTS
>>23323974Thank you Anon, I'll check what's available to me.
>>23322713BFG and Witches were awesome when I was in 5th grade
Beautiful people are morally better than ugly people, this is a fact. Read Rígsþula.
>>23321965Thanks for proving his point anon.
>>23322709True, it's also why his writing is so good, same with Rowling. Hate filled people who managed to make kino literature that seemingly make fun of certain stereotypes and ideas until you realise the authors are more sincere about it than you thought.If Dahl were alive today and had a Twitter account he would be hated 1000x more than Rowling or any other British celebrity.
>>23321965bottom unironically looks like my grandmother
>>23321965It's true in the sense that people will like being around you and perceive you as a positive vibe and therefore categorize you as "attractive" in a way. He's of course not saying that staying positive will turn you into Henry Cavill. Ah, responding to bait.
>>23323238No you can't. You don't know what a "good jaw and chin" are.
>>23325421I'm literally a 8/10
>>23322709>sadistic glee in seeing anyone who disagrees with you punished.Uhh im thinking... based?
>>23321965prove it
>>23325419k homo
Read Schopenhauer's On Physiognomy.
>>23322696>a stinker like HitlerYou know, the more I learn about this Hitler character, the less I care for him!
>>23322709Based
>ITT: Ugly people exemplify their ugliness by expressing their thoughtsPottery.
>>23325441True. The thing with Rowling though is that her class views are implicit and tacticly show through the way she wrights 'sufficiently magical' races, vs variations of humans.For example, she's very clear that discriminating against 'mudbloods' is a very bad thing that only evil, arrogant and disreputable people do, and this is the kind of view she wants to present herself as having and promoting.On the other hand, she has no issue whatsoever creating magical made up races, which have clearly innate characteristics that are undeniably distinct from normal humans, and actively mocks characters who refuse to respect these obvious distinctions as being completely natural and moreover justifying the most blatant discrimination and class divisions thought this (of course House Elves are born natural slaves silly).For most of her life she seems to have been easily swayed by the 'vibe' of the environment she lived as as so what felt right or wrong, but recently seems to have gained a backbone and developed a much more deliberate worldview that she actively defends and I respect her for seemingly developing out of her previous unreflective naivety.
>>23325441>>23329418>when pseudy libtards get BTFO by children's literature
>>23325419chad hominem
>>23323207All of this is the "morality" of the liberal shopkeeper who despises everything that doesn't benefit his priggish milleau. It resents natural aristocracy because it is unfair and while despising the proles because they might take their place. Family, community and the notion of forgiveness and virtue is hogwash to Dahl, because his only values are the kind of trite, bourgeois morality that led Englishmen to accept a Paki as their PM because he plays the part of the snobby "good sort."If you think there's anything admirable in any of the inhuman garbage he's written you are a bugman. You are all liberals. I will read my children Beatrice Potter and James Gurney.
>>23330160Imagine being this assblasted by someone who wrote children's books where the overriding theme was "be kind and don't hate yourself">I will read my childrenBest of luck to them they're gonna need it
>>23330172The only theme to Dahl's entire life was moneygrubbing.
>>23330191Sometimes people hide their true motives in conversation because they're ashamed of them. But when they're writing, you can see them.
>>23322696if i didn’t like him already. i do now lol
>>23330160>It resents natural aristocracyHow does the natural aristocrat feel about being outfought, outthought, and outmaneuvered by a shoe keeper? What exactly is the "natural elite" elite in?
>>23322709>English characterhe was welsh & norwegian you stupid nigger
>>23321965>he was filtered by a children’s bookOh nonononononono
>>23321965No, this is actually true. Physiognomy is real, you can tell that people are evil by looking at them, and it isn't just ugliness.>duhh buhNo really explain to me how this is NOT true. The human brain evolved for how long to do facial recognition? Some Harvard guys built a computer program that can look at a person's face and, controlling for race and gender, guess that person's political proclivities at a rate of nearly 70%. But the average human's ability is still well above random, meaning that you can do this too. Your instincts are more accurate than any gay rational process you could undergo to try and figure out someone's character, and it's had millions of years of testing where the penalty for failure is rape and death.
>>23331425Well, I imagine they don't spend a lot of times thinking about things that didn't happen.
>>23321965I think this sorta checks out
>>23321965He was right