Who makes the best fitting straight leg jean?
>>18089372orSlow 105
There so manyAmerican eagle if you want really comfortable stretch jeans
>>18089381>stretch jeanslooking for real jeans, not faux jeans.
>>18089372Iron heart
>>18089390>Go to store that sells quality and not cheap fast fashion>look for jeans you like>????
Just make sure they are not made in china
>>18089372tcb 50
>>18089372I have a couple pairs from APC that I really like
vintage 501's why would you buy anything else
>>18089372Wrangler 13MWZ in the low budget range
>>18089372True Religion
>>18089372the new true guy fit from naked and famous
>>18090040NTA but the 1955 is perpetually out. The 634 is always in stock and looks fairly comparable to the 711 just going off of size charts
>>18089372Wrangler. For me, nothing else even comes close.
>>18089688i have a pair of the new standards (bought for maybe 50 dollars used). i do like them a lot, but the fit feels a little dated because of the low rise. It would be a better fit if the rise was an inch or so higher. I don't know if they've changed the fit at all over the years to keep up with changing standards. This was the "new" standard over a decade ago. Also the button holes on the fly are coming apart, which seems like a weird thing to fail on a pair of jeans that retails for over 200.Just ordered a pair of their "jean standard" which has a higher rise. Found a pair for 52. will see how they fit.
>>18090040>tvb or lvcaint nobodty talking about that bullshit i am talking about real vintage made in the usa 501's that hug your ass and make you look like a man. you are 6ft+ and fit right anon+?
Abercrombie athletic straight are my favorite personally.
Sugar Cane 1947s. 501s the way they used to make em.
>>18090510I second this, only I prefer the sugarcane 1955
>>18090510>cotton threadGreat cut hamstring by repro autism
Rogue Territory
Filson. Search up the “Railsplitter jeans”.
Left field smokestacks
>>18090795This. I am into repro cuts, but why use inferior thread? It ruins the entire prospect of the jeans. I'm not retarded enough to buy a pair of $200+ jeans that intentionally use worse thread that falls apart.
>>18089372>Who makes the best fitting straight leg jean?this depends on your body type, but in general, many people I know in real life and in forums with different body shapes were happy with Levis 501 '93, the skinnier people particularly with Levis 502
>>18090984>cheaperno? 501's at any decent thrift are $40-60 the nerd shit your talking about is $300+. raw denim is fucking gay, sufu self edge blue in green havent been cool in 15 years. actually BiG has trans pretty well into carrying chill brands but gtfo with that muh raw denim
>>18089863>>18090229you guys realize that the wrangler cowboy cut is actually a boot cut right? it’s not really totally straight.
>>18091436most thrift stores have only a small chance of having real vintage levis, let alone in the right size. and why would they cost that much at a thrift? and tcb is very inexpensive. you have no idea what you're talking about.
>>18091461>not having a currated vintage store(s) in your cityfly over states shoudl not be allowed to have the internet. no shit tcb is expensive, thats why it sucks retard. spend money on real clothes, buy vintage 501. you sound 5'5 and doughy
For cheap, wrangler. For best quality, Observer Collection.
>>18091459You're a retard 13MWZ are tapered
>>18091826in which fucking universe? do you even own a pair? they have an obvious flare that you can see once you put te
>>18089400>>18089372China can actually be quite good. I have a pair of Red tornados for around 80 eur and they are actually really well made, very clean stiching and a good straight cut, denim is also of solid quality. They don't have the jap/american pedigree but for the price they are really solid.
>>18091937*them on
>>18091937In the one where I own 3 pair and they have a smaller leg opening than my 501 STFs or Sugar Canes (coincidentally my 13mwz have the same size leg opening as my iron heart 888 which are... a tapered cut). It's also the same universe where Wrangler's own website lists them as tapered while there's a whole separate boot cut series (945/946/947) that has a wider leg opening
>>18091984>In the one where I own 3 pair and they have a smaller leg opening than my 501 STFs or Sugar Canes consider the following: their thigh is smaller than either of those and it tapers out below the knee. >also the same universe where Wrangler's own website lists them as taperedat the thigh maybe, but definitely not at the hem. they so obviously flare out when you’re actually wearing them, it’s not a bell bottom but it definitely flares.
>>18092056Except it literally doesn't 'taper' out. It tapers to a smaller leg opening from the knee. Here's an old fit pic. 13MWZ in 32x32Please show me where they flare out
>>18092072your pair are clearly too long for you and therefore are a terrible representation of how they actually sit below the knee. post a pic where they actually drape cleanly instead of scrunching up.
>>18092080You realize that stacking creates more flare, not less right? Or am I arguing with a 50iq retard?
>>18092085it makes them look like a car crash on your legs and also makes you look like you don’t know how to buy pants that are hemmed right, or cuff your pants for that matter (which shouldn’t be an issue since according to you these are apparently tapered and not bootcut)
>>18092099Holy cope. Just admit you're wrong and call it a day bro>or cuff your pants for that matter (which shouldn’t be an issue since according to you these are apparently tapered and not bootcutI wear these with cowboy boots most of the time. Cuffs+cowboy boots only works if you're going for a 40s or 50s western look. Otherwise stacks are the way to go. And if I did cuff them they'd look even more tapered than they are now
>>18092105Hell, I'll do you one better. I just got home so here's a quick pic of the 13mwz in question. Thigh, knee (~12" down the leg) and hem. Notice anything about the numbers? Like that they get smaller?
>>18092105i wear my cowboy cuts with chelsea boots all the time and they’re so obviously bootcut it’s not funny. my 501s get caught on the pull tab all the time where i never have this issue with the cowboy cuts. either you bought the wrong thing just like how you bought the wrong length or we got a very different jean from the same brand. >>18092110i noticed how the last image is cut off without clearly showing where the tape measure ends, yeah.
>>18092110>I too can be a retard at times. Uncropped version of bottom right
>>18092113And one more. Hem over the knee.>>18092112Sounds like you have bitch legs and can't fill out your jeans. Sad. Maybe you should buy pants that fit?
>>18092117Why are you still humoring this low effort troll?
>>18092120Time to kill + enough retards parroting the bootcut meme online that I think he may be genuine
>>18092117lol what? my 501s are literally skintight over my thighs lol, what the fuck are you talking about? you’re the one who buys jeans that are too long for your legs rofl>>18092120probably because i’m right and bro has some whack ass jeans that don’t even fit him properly.
>>18092117here’s my cowboy cuts next to my LVC 1947 501s. if cowboy cuts count as tapered then i guess so do 501s, invalidating half the recommendations in this thread.
>>18092139>Anon learns that 501s are tapered
>>18092145literally every resource online including multiple people in this thread consider them straight cut. either you have some sort of undiagnosed jean autism and to you straight cut means you can use the inseam as a straightedge, or apparently the entire world including levis themselves have been advertising the 501s wrong.
>>18091984>>18092145also lol, speaking of advertising, wrangler lists the 13MWZ as bootcut on their website, as well as filing them under tapered, original, western, and cowboy cut. apparently these jeans are somehow all of the above. who knew?
>>18091941The rise looks weird.
>>18092433well the taper below the knee between 501 and 13MWZ is identical, which means they are straight cut and not tapered. case closed
>>180924335'5 and doughy
>>18089372the patrician choice would probably be one of those japanese brands. they make the best denim in the world
>>18090699That's the 1947 with a zipper right? I'm about to pick up the Sugar Cane 2021s as a secondary for a more tapered fit.
>>18092436So what is the best brand if you are above 6', in your opinion?
>>18089921>t. romanian living in UK
calvin klein standards straight fitselvedge, good weight thats heavier than levisi have a black and blue pair and theyre really comfortable, also usually on sale and they feel like they will last forever, no taper either
>>18089372Levi!
>>18094213>Gender inclusive design with minimal, essential stylingThe last time I tried gender inclusive sizing bullshit it was 2-3 sizes smaller than normal men’s sizing. Idk why they feel the need to complicate fucking clothing size of all things which is already incredibly inconsistent on its own
>>18094648Thorough response, thank you. I would rather pay someone to make good jeans.
>>18094697Ah, I didn't consider paying someone to custom make them for myself. I was thinking 'oh, I don't want to sew jeans myself.'I also have a good but not great tailor. So I would need to locate one.
>>18089375Orslow is great but only for manlets
>>18089372Me. I make the best fitting straight leg jean.
>>18091459retard, they are straight. unlike you
>>18094648I usually wear high rise straight fit with a 33.5 to 34” waist. The Warehouse lot 800xx has weird sizing on the standard and strange website. Seems like I would need a size 36?
>>18095073always go off the batch measurements not the tag size. some jap brands can be fucky.
>>18089372why do hicks tuck their tshirts?
>>18090243just got in the apc "jean standard" and can confirm it's a very good fit. very similar to the new standard only it has a higher rise, which is exactly what i was looking for. would recommend if you can find them for <$100. I recommend apc in general not because they're the highest quality vintage repro denim head jeans, but because the company is well established and has been producing consistent styles for decades so it's pretty easy to find them on the second hand market for less than $100. Wouldn't buy them at the full retail price obviously
>>18094213its crazy that i don't even think of calvin klein when it comes to jeans, which is weird because that was their thing back in the day. i don't recall ever even trying on a pair of ck jeans or seeing a pair that I liked, let alone a selvedge pair from them. Where do you usually buy them?>>18092433Best "mall brand" jean? I'd say Club Monaco (although it's rare to see them in a mall), sometimes j crew has decent jeans, but they're super inconsistent, i never felt like they really nailed the jeans game even though they ought to have it in the bag by now. Nordstrom caries apc sometimes and nudie n&f, but i haven't shopped there in ages. Have heard good things about Abercrombie jeans recently>>18094906could only find one pair on poshmark and it was a 30 but the waist measurement was like 13" and the rise was like 8 >:o>>18097312more conservative culture so it defers to more traditional practices. it also seems more professional, even if it's just a t shirt. also shows off the pants and belt more. i hang out around a lot of hicks, but i don't do the full tuck.
>>18089372Dior Homme Hedi era
>>18097934MIJ or what?
>>18089372Just get some Levi's 505's and spare yourself the headache.
>>18089381>stretch>in straight leg jeansWhy are you /fa/ggots such faggots?
>>18097934>Dior Homme Hedi eraTruth, still kicking myself for not getting some 21CMs back in the day
How long does it take for Iron heart to restock?
>>18099806Check their forum thread for whatever pair you're looking for. They'll post restock announcements there. Or you can check third party stocklists since the price will be identical
>>18089375NAME
Anything like Wrangler 13MWZ with a really high rise that are avialable in Yurop or UK? 13MWZ are budget jeans but sold at a premium price here now.The fit and 12" rise are comfy as fuck.
>>18094571>>Gender inclusive designWhat the fuck?Nah, actually in the ((((current year)))) I am not surprised.
>>18097312>why do hicks tuck their tshirts?If you're fit with a strong core and own a nice belt, it looks good.
>>18091056good,get fucked whitoid cuck
>>18101300Yeah, seems sensible really. Do you know of any that are straight or slightly tapered that have a high rise? Looked at hebtroco and they might be high, but don't say (would need to contact). Some others around too, Dawson maybe.
>>18089372I like Diesel 1995's
>>18098609thanks for the advice. didn't know kaihara had a factory in taiwan. the biggest problem with these brands, like uniqlo is when they do stretch selvedge. stretch selvedge is seppuku mode imo. i did have a few pairs of uniqlo selvedge back in the day, but they didn't stick around in my closet. not even sure where they went, but didn't like them enough to keep them around. think they were too slim on me or something. >>18098721my standards are too high at this point to wear most levis. only have one pair and it's lvc 501. it's about one size too big so i mostly just wear them as work wear. >>18101300>>18101331i've heard that the quality of levis jeans in europe are generally better than those in the US so maybe just check those out
>>18098721>>18098864Can confirm, it's truly lousy. 34" inseam and the thigh taper lands entirely above the knee, no good for moving.
>>18089372It's very individual, you'll only know by trying them on.I've always found Hollister (which I'm pretty sure are Abercrombie & Fitch under the hood) and H&M to be good and Levis to be absolute dogshit. The fit is always bad and the build quality is awful>>18101379Diesel and All Saints are also pretty good too
>>18089372what an ugly Neanderthal looking whitoid faggot
>>18102428seething whitoid faggot, go cry somewhere
>>18103120are you blind you whitoid seething cuck? this is my first post on /fa/ after 6-7 months but keep seething
>>18103214indeed
>>18089372Walmart
>>18090040+1 for resolute. I love my 710s. Although they’re more of a slim fit straight jean, than a true straight fit. For straight you’d want the 714. I’m not a fan of low rise so I can’t recommend the 711. I found the waist size to be a little small though. I initially bought a 34” waist (normally a 33” in most other jeans and pants). It was extremely tight, even after wearing for a few days. I ended up swapping them for a 36” waist (they don’t do a 35”). They fit a lot better, perhaps a little too big, especially after stretching out. Fine with a belt though. I might end up getting them taken in a bit.Pic rel, my 710s one wash.
>>18103545Jesus Christ...
>>18104529?
>>18104699maybe he thinks you need to hem your jeans
>>18101241>>18102181you give browncel cucks a single (you) and they'll respond 100% of the tone
cowboy general
>>18105007not that anonprobably just hemmed his jeans for shoes/sneakers and cuffs for boots.i think its very ill advised to hem your jeans to un-cuff length especially un-cuff + boots length. your jeans will become too short when you start washing them. it sucks when raws become high waters. and its kind of hard to predict inseam shrinkage because it varies so wildly from about 4-10% from fabric to fabric with seemingly no way to guess.now days heres what i do:- hem to shoe/sneaker length plus a small single cuff worth extra- wear the jeans with the extra length for the first year or so until they get washed- do the first wash on cold and air dry- if more shrinkage is desired bump the water temp up- if even more is desired tumble dry on medium or high- when perfect length is achieved put a mark on the pocket bag to signify they should be washed cold only from now onperfectly dialed in inseam length, long term, every time. never high water raws again. it seems spergy but see how big the cuff is on the wranglers in my pic here?that cuff & a bit more length is completely gone after 2 washes on "eco low" & wranglers aren't even known for vertical shrinkage
the pic is a bad example of how much extra length i normally recommend btw. about half that if not less.
both of these jeans had the same inseam, measured and tag size, when brand new.right pair is cuffed to roughly the same length as left pair. left pair was dad washed abt 20 times on cold only and air dried. jeans shrink a lot.
>>18089863>>18091984>>18092072>>18092110Are 11MWZs any good?
Redpill me on Wrangler 13mwz, how does it fit compared to 501?
>>18105786>>18105789wrangler never fucked with the 13mwz fit over the years and 501 fit gets tweaked every few years. so 13mwz you are basically getting the same kind of vintage fit/cut as you would from a pair of lvcs. and you get a kind of cool broken twill fabric. and they're 2oz heavier than 501s. for 30 bucks. they're based as hell. if you don't care about the fact they're not selvedge they fuck hard.wrangler made the leather patch plastic a few years ago and its big cringe but you can just take it off like i do. you'll never tell it was there after 1 wash.>how does it fit compared toleg fit, taper ratio etc is very similar.501 upper block is mid rise + more designed to fit average el americano body. 13mwz upper block is high rise + cut for 1950s chad body type.
>>1810578611mw is the vintage jean that eventually became 13mwz.if you're looking at reproduction 11mw's they're gonna be really similar save for some details and such.https://long-john.nl/original-wrangler-11mw-proto-type-jeans-from-1947/https://www.heddels.com/2012/10/a-brief-history-of-wrangler-jeans/a big part of why 13mwz are so good is how close they are to the original 11mw prototypes and the earliest runs of 13mwz.
>>18105007>>18105768I cuff my jeans with boots and wear them uncuffed with sneakers. No need to hem as Resolute come in a variety of lengths. These are a 36”.
>>18105775I always get a couple more inches than I need for length because I like to cuff + shrinking over time. Plus, you can always hem, but you can't add length.
>>18103172I would fuck the one with the slutty bare foot so hard.
Levis is the only right answer.
>>18105874tcb = lvc but better for half the price
>>18105775I’m assuming the waist shrinks too and fit a bit more snug?
>>18105716Real cucks are usually whitoid
>>18106284to be fair: it took two world wars to bleed the masculinity out of white men down to the level of other races
>>18106535not enough of them were killed desu, should have been more war or war should have been extended
>>18106707i used to give the hebrew israelite guys in seattle a big ol' thumbs up every time i walked by. youtube gutted their channel after they beat up and chased a jewish guy down the street then posted a video of it but they still give sermons on 5th and pine every saturday. i noticed they expanded their message from 'blacks are the real israelites' to 'black latinos and pacific islanders are the real israelites' because they were having a hard time with recruitment. their new preacher is a boring mexican guy.
>>18106707>not enough of them were killedi mean yeah white men are still by far and wide the most masculine race even despite so much gene pool selection against it last century. countries like sweden spent a century sterilizing aggressive men and guys who worked out too hard at the gym. explains a lot about their current state today.
