How do I take a pic of someone with a bright sky and some landmark behind them?Either the person gets dark or the sky overblown.
>>4307765>mft users have girlfriends and practice proper camera technique to extract max quality per image taken Can't argue with either of those points, darn
>>4307793>mft users have girlfriendshad, she left for chad when he took a better pic on his fuji with DRO400 turned on and sent it to his instax printer
>>4307794have again, she came back for the thermal printer
>>4307765If my phone can do it so easily why is it a pain on my camera?
>>4308295On your camera the blur from motion/alignment errors looks obviously bad because it is mixed with real details so you go "wow, HDR sucks" because it is higher resolutionOn your phone the entire photo is already smeary sharpened blotches so it's just a little ghosting sometimes, nothing stands out if everything is shit
Pic related is latest photo I made.I got a question, if I was working with stressful people in their 20s to 30s, how can I make sure I get a satisfying film or photo shoot instead of one that gets overly dramatic for no reason?
>>4308137nothing in life is certain my friend, but if it is one thing that makes people happy and calms them down it is money.
>>4308144Not really anon. Give me something hard, practical, and logical.
As a hobbyist, I'm not qualified, but my guess is planning all details beforehand, making sure that everyone knows exactly what to do in advance and whatever is needed for shoot is available and ready at start would help things go smooth.
>>4308145Fap before shooting, easy>c: PSASST
>>4308137Well that would depend entirely on what you decide will satisfy you. When you figure that out, do that.
does anyone know the Olympus OM-1 mark I also has a silver version of it?and does anyone know where I can find a good second hand one from in the UK?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS CORPORATIONCamera ModelE-M1MarkIICamera SoftwareOM Workspace 2.0.2WPhotographerIVOR RACKHAMMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Color Filter Array Pattern17660Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2022:06:15 16:04:52Exposure Time1/640 secF-Numberf/3.5Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias-2.3 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length12.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1920Image Height1306RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4304802>non-spiteful build quality.When are they gonna bring back the metal E-M5?
>>4305151I know right, the mark 2 will always be my fave. So weighty and the last one to keep that metal tripod mount. Worth giving up 4 megapickles for i reckon
>>4304585yo yo yo
>>4306684stop bumping your shitty gear threads that should've gone in sqt. there's nothing to discuss further
>>4304718kek
Industrial town[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelGalaxy S23 UltraCamera SoftwareS918USQS2CXCNSensing MethodNot DefinedFocal Length (35mm Equiv)69 mmMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.4Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1868Image Height1867Image Created2024:04:24 22:25:49Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Width4000Image Height1868ISO Speed Rating50Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramUnique Image IDL12XSPE01MF-Numberf/2.4Exposure Time24771/100000000 secFocal Length7.90 mmFlashNo FlashMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardExposure Bias0 EVWhite BalanceAutoBrightness10.5 EVExposure ModeAutoLens Aperturef/2.4Color Space InformationUncalibrated
>>4308100Nice. Please proceed.
English:(For those who use Facebook)Can you support this image, pleaseWe strive for this and we are willing to do itIt would be of great help if you supported by liking and sharing this photoWe are willing to win a contest, it will end on MondayThanks for the supportEspañol:(Para los que usan Facebook)Puedes apoyar esta imagen, por favorNos esforzamos para esto y estamos dispuestos a realizarloSeria de gran ayuda que apoyaras dando like y compartiendo esta fotoEstamos dispuestos a ganar un concurso, terminara el lunesGracias por el apoyo
>>4308162>virgennice. do i get to pick one or is it random?
Well, it's a competition.But perhaps that is where we stand out the most.
>I don't have a job>I shoot 100 rolls a month>When the stimulus check hit I've been spending a lot>1200-1300 undeveloped rolls in the fridge>500 rolls that are developed but not scanned (not seen by me)Why are filmfags like this?https://youtu.be/gqxzx2BDm0Q[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution1828 dpiVertical Resolution1828 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1280Image Height849
>>4305579>>4305480Share with me what the ideal non/anti-gearfag setup would be? Can I still shoot large format film without being a gearfag, or is 35mm the only permissible film format?
>>4305619gearfaggotry isn't something you can buy and sell, gearfaggotry isn't a line drawn in dollars, and gearfaggotry isn't a status you earn because you have a nicer camera than someone else. you might be financially irresponsible, rich, a scrooge, or addicted to retail therapy, but you're not over the line yet. you are not yet gearfag just because you have gear. you are definitely a fag, but not yet a gearfag.it's a way of life, it's a way of looking at photography, from the results to the process - all through the lens of gear. making excuses based on gear. passing judgement based on gear. it doesn't stop at the camera, it doesn't stop at film vs digital, ccd vs cmos, or full frame vs mft. gearfaggotry runs deep. deeper than "i will finally take those photos once I get my leica". the tripod, the head, the flash, the modifiers, the reflectors, the scrims, the fucking STANDS, the screen, the printer, the paper, the frame, the glass. the gearfag is exacting. the gearfag is never satisfied. the gearfag has spent a lot of time thinking about all of these, arguing about the best - the gearfag sees all of these things, all this gear, as so inexorably intertwined with photography that photography is mostly just about what you used to make the photo. and it need not be expensive, the gearfag may very well decide that expensive things make photography worse. it's just about the gear. when the gearfag is presented with a photo they want a closer look at the exif before they even look at the fucking picture so they can make sure they're allowed to like it. and if you used flash, they will ask you which flash you used. so they can say "oh, doesn't the color temperature vary up to 400k? you shot on that trash? no wonder your colors are FUCKED".that is what it means to be gearfag.just by asking what to buy so you can not be a gearfag, as if a purchase can make you more authentic photographer, you put a toe over the gearfag line. retract it. Now!
>>4305622That must have been fun to write, and I agree with you. It's an excuse to judge an image based on the gear rather than the content. I like prints more than looking at images on a screen. I have fun imagining a pixel peeper/gearfag using a loupe or standing 1 inch away from a framed print on a wall exclaiming that the corners are soft from a shitty lens and declaring it a terrible picture for that reason alone. In a completely silent gallery as well.
>>4305387valid>>4305524<1% is actually is like that
The Winogrand on the golden gate, but more gay
what's the /p/ consensus on this dude? seems like the prototypical sleazy art photographer, albeit talented
Who
>>4308138Bro you are like that one dude in Calculus 2 in college who when all of us are trying to figure out integrals and trig substitution you ask, "Do I have to write down the teacher's name on the test"BRO WHY?!
>>4308141>Noooo you have to know who my boyfriend is!!!
>>4308143Finally someone who doesn't take this god awful website seriously.
>>4308133>likes sexWhat a disgusting pervert.
Now that JEWKON bought red.I can already see what is going to happen to Red.Do you want to hook an external HDR OLED 8k monitor? Only the flagship model has this, the most basic is limited to 1080p.Do you want to use two SSDs instead of a single one?Only the flagship model can do it, the most basic is limited to a single ssd.It is over for red.
>>4306246Did you know that a 34mm lens used for 8x10 film would be the equivalent of using a 5mm lens on 35mm film? Bonkers.
>>4306293I thought itwas an aerial photography lens
>>4306386Maybe it was a 34 inch lens? That would be a 120mm equivalent on 8x10.
>>4306293It had a 10 inch front element
>>4301522Nah, Blackmagic still has a special looking image and BRAW is fantastic. I've been using my BPCC 4k for the last three years and the image from it outclasses cameras that are thousands of dollars more. It's a total workhorse that's taken a beating. As long a Black Magic keeps their value proposition, they'll be fine.
which one would be the best one to go for, more to the point I'm making here is which one would you say stands out the most as being the one that has the best performance in most of it's functions and settings?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
up
>>4294290bump
>>4296582Great combo. Get the panny 35-100 f2.8 and you won't need more in the years to come.
>>4296582>Same price and size as an a7c+40mm f2.5 with a softer, slower, larger, heavier lens.Same WR too, because olympus doesn't build the -5s to the -1s standards. I find it easier to locate a parts only olympus -5 or -10 camera than a -1 camera with WR related failures like glitchy screens, ports, and buttons.Get literally anything else, you're overspending to gain almost nothing over an e-m5 and 17mm.
hello
which more modern Olympus Digital Cameras would be good ones to consider getting, I'm trying to find some that would be great for things like Wildlife, Nature, landscapes, night, theatre and Street Photography.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:PhotographerBruce KiteImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Width1400Image Height1021
>>4305167oh right okay, can you not get this one in sliver also??
what up
>>4293459
bump bump
Whomst is the retard bumping gear threads? Heres what you came here for:FF digital and sheet film are the only excusable formats anything else is cope have a nice day.
been thinking for awhile about maybe opening up my own Used Cameras Shop but not entirely sure where to start or what I need to do in order to get it off the ground and not just be an idea but a plan I can get into action with
coffee shop in the front, camera shop in the backmake it as trendy and histery as possible because that's the type of audience that even uses and is willing to by cameras these days. make it a local thing by having competitions and seminars and things like thatdown side: gays, pretentious hipsters, and uni fags
>>4295219yo
>>4295458>3.25%
>>4295224this but also make tiktok slop glorifying the shit out of the cameras you have in-stock. also look into shipping capabilities so its not just a local shithole only type of place.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
>>4307926the lensbaby etc effect lenses are also the same thing, unless someone saw you use them they'd never know. these are strangely underrated because they aren't vintage brand name and are explicitly called effect lenses.
>>4307542>Micro-pop>Color depth >3D rendering It's like someone took existing concepts and shuffled the words around
the amount of people defending shit lenses while not even knowing everything that goes into designing a lens is beyond my understanding>>4307766just let them be retards, you wont change anyones mind here, this is 4chan, if someone wants to take your advice, they will do so without replying with bullshit or at all>>4307381>>4307540>>4307542>>4307656>>4307763>>4307768>>4307770>>4307771>>4307772>>4307773Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4308027I know, asking for photo examples on a photo board is crazy right?
>>4308027>cargo cultCan you tell us about the scientific basis for 3d lenses
Why do old photographs looks so crystal sharp? Is it because of the giant glass negatives?
>>4302678>calling someone else a turbo sperg when you're the one unable to read contextual cues like the date something is published, or the shift in tone between a recommendation to a mug punter and an actual technical analysis, which he frequently gives both of, or between a statement of opinion vs fact, comparison vs absolutism, etc.
>>4300665Look under Ryan Rockwell's page.
wheres all yalls bmws at 16. gotta feed that growing senpai nigga
>>4306416>believability of ken being a millionaire from selling condos goes up 100%Wow, these iphones are amazingI can hardly tell it from his canon R5
>>4297395>Saturated fat>>4297397Saturated fat, probably.
we must bring back the BIG BENIS camera
>>4302919no, it's been over for yearshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qC_s0EeTFzg
can micro four thirds replace these somehow?
>>4302919Any camera I use is a big-penis camera because I have a big penis.I shoot Fuji.
Hardly a bridge exclusive feature.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON Z 7Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.1 (Macintosh)Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern880Focal Length (35mm Equiv)50 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:03:24 18:26:14Exposure Time1/100 secF-Numberf/6.3Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating640Lens Aperturef/6.3Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
Super benis zoom[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
Been having fun learning with various film stocks and an old Spotmatic. I love the textures possible with black and white, and the vibes that colour film can produce. Posting some random shit to that endIlford FP4+[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareEZ Controller 8.10.008 (221031)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024-04-26T22:22:29+01:00Image Width2560Image Height1697
>>4307902this one has SOVL
>>4307901Couple more before I let the thread die[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelQSS-32_33Camera SoftwareQSS-32_33 9.02.001 2008.01.13Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3088Image Height2048
>>4307997
>>4307998
>>4307999[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 8.10.008 (221031)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024-04-24T10:04:29+01:00Image Width1887Image Height2560
