[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
06/20/16New 4chan Banner Contest with a chance to win a 4chan Pass! See the contest page for details.
[Hide] [Show All]


[Catalog] [Archive]

File: images.jpg (7 KB, 257x144)
7 KB
7 KB JPG
Do selfies possess merits?
/X/ here, I can believe these steal your soul and confirm Amish suspicions.
>>
>>3602468
>Do selfies possess merits?
Yours do, for me.

Regards
Mark Zuckerberg

Just wondering

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1980
Image Height2000
Scene Capture TypeStandard
13 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
photo editor for the college paper atm. pay is peanuts but its at least related to photography
>>
USMC Combat Photographer. 4541
>>
>>3600698
Post pic and timestamp.
>>
>>3600699

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationRight-Hand, Top
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3088
Image Height2316
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>3596131
Recently landed work in the movie industry that has resulted in more movie industry work. It's pretty fun so far.

File: TS560x560.jpg (163 KB, 450x450)
163 KB
163 KB JPG
I never knew Full Frame was so much better than APSC.

First there is less noise.

And the most important part: The bokeh is much more noticeable.

I used to shoot with a Nikon D7000 + 35mm 1.8g DX.
Now I've gone to a Nikon D750 + 50mm 1.8 D

People here told me the 35mm 1.8 on APSC was equivalent to 50mm 1.8 on FF.

I had to manually add more blur on Photoshop with the D7000 + 35mm 1.8g to make my photos look more professional.

Now with a Full Frame and a 50mm 1.8 D I no longer need to do it anymore, the out of focus bokeh looks very blurry.


Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
75 replies and 7 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: 1578192255734.jpg (46 KB, 720x539)
46 KB
46 KB JPG
ok from now on, anyone who starts a thread just to talk about sensor size is getting banned from this board forever
>>
>>3596785
>the most important part
>bokeh
I too love to have everything out of focus and blurred without any character details to tell a story.
>>
>>3602290
pls be an actual mod!
fuck I forgot /p/ has no mods.
>>
>>3602290
>sensorlet on meltdown
>>
>>3599340
F2.8.

Meanwhile FF has 1.4 lens which gives it an advantage.

File: 1527659769394.png (23 KB, 633x758)
23 KB
23 KB PNG
Went to a photography store today to get a print done. I sat down at the booth and readied my phone. I was expecting the machine to let me select the photo I wanted to print from the right directory. Instead it scans and scans and scans.
100. 1000. 10000 photos.
Oh no I think, I know what this pos machine is scanning. Frantically, I unplug my phone but it's too late "the device is safe to remove".
Thousand of sonic porn, furry and generally disgusting images pop up on the screen asking me to select which image I want to print.
I turn 360 degrees and walk straight out. To make matters worse the machne is connected to the internet so I'm pretty sure they in some eternal cache.

And that's why I decided to buy a large format printer.
4 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3601179
what you want me to explain the machine? it was some fuji piece of shit with a track ball for a mouse. you had to agree not to print "offensive" material. and it starts scanning your phone super fast
>>
>>3601166
>board wrecking wojak pity larp posting
Fuck off.
>>
>>3601182
Kodak machines. Next time use Bluetooth transfer and file dropping instead of "scan phone for pictures"
>>
>>3601692
(Cont)
Almost happened to me where I knew there were pictures of my dick getting sucked and ex gfs on my phone and nude selfies and I unplugged that shit real fucking quick when I saw it was scanning everything
>>
>>3601166
I always look sad and i have eye problems and i walked past a legless wheelchair bound man taking a picture of a flower and he probably thought i was crying over him

File: 6347.jpg (169 KB, 1000x668)
169 KB
169 KB JPG
Last one was breddy gud, let's try it again.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
65 replies and 50 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3602227
>What the fuck is that animal? It's awesome.
That's a common marmoset. Here we call it "sagüi" (to be more specific, "sagüi-do-tufo-branco).

>Your edits are way too contrasty for me
I guess you're right. It's the second anon that tells me this. Usually I just crush the blacks when the dark areas are already pretty dark, but this seems to happen a lot (I guess it's the type of light I search for).

>you're crushing the blacks harder than the confederate government
Iol!

>Clone stamp out those two birds that are cut off and this is a serious winner
Will consider. I had something like three or four frames of this scene... this one was the most "clean" I got, I'm afraid. :(


Thank you, glad you like some of them!
>>
>>3602234
Hmm, yeah... when this kind of thing happens, I just keep the imperfections. The only things I removed lately were dust spots from my sensor.

But I guess this is a grey area of photography. I was more severe about these things, until I saw what Steve McCurry does to some of his photographs... he's way, way more agressive than I'll ever be with editing things to clean his scenes. I feel I can't condemn.
>>
Genuine question, is zoo photography wildlife photography?
>>
>>3602317
No.
>>
>>3602317

Are the animals "wild"? No, of course not, so, therefore, it's not WILDlife. It's animal photography.

File: 1.jpg (1.05 MB, 1224x1736)
1.05 MB
1.05 MB JPG
Submit, rate, critique, have fun, etc...

Some photos from my very first roll of film. Last one is a B&W conversion.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width3072
Image Height2048
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2019:11:23 00:06:23
Image Width2448
Image Height3472
184 replies and 110 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: dumb.gif (1.85 MB, 335x249)
1.85 MB
1.85 MB GIF
>>3602408
>asks about film costs
>talks about camera costs
>>
>>3602404
>Are you not in N. America?
why would I be
it's a terrible place
>>
>>3602410
>how do y'all still justify shooting film?
camera cost enters into that decision when compared to shooting digital.
>>
>>3602335
I live in southeast asia and it cost me like 5-6 usd for the cheapest film and around 8-9 usd for my favorite films like ultramax or pan 400, but unfortunately high end films like portra and fuji slide films prices have skyrocketed recently to around 100$ usd for each propacks. Also it cost me around 3$ per roll for a lab 35mm color dev without scanning and 5$ with a scan.
>>
>>3602411
i dunno anon, sounds like you can't even afford $7/roll where you live...

File: DSC03836small.jpg (1.57 MB, 2000x1334)
1.57 MB
1.57 MB JPG
Recent Photo Thread because the last one maxed
>>3583644

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-7RM2
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)31 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width7952
Image Height5304
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2020:01:05 19:12:55
Exposure Time1/13 sec
F-Numberf/10.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating50
Lens Aperturef/10.0
Brightness4.6 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceOther
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length31.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2000
Image Height1334
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
240 replies and 147 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: Asset0023.jpg (2.48 MB, 2048x1364)
2.48 MB
2.48 MB JPG
>>3602217

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Softwaredarktable 2.6.3
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2020:01:16 19:34:39
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2048
Image Height1364
>>
File: DSCF2029.jpg (3.73 MB, 3000x2000)
3.73 MB
3.73 MB JPG
I had an idea but the stupid brush ruined it.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelX-T3
Camera SoftwareDigital Camera X-T3 Ver3.00
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)121 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2020-01-16T23:39:53+19:00
Exposure Time1/125 sec
F-Numberf/8.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating400
Lens Aperturef/8.0
Brightness6.3 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length80.40 mm
Image Width3000
Image Height2000
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
File: 1579191414391crop.jpg (191 KB, 1122x1118)
191 KB
191 KB JPG
>>3601893
I like this one a lot.
Slight crit: The uneven lines of the doorway kind of bother me.
I tried a crop on it to sort of draw out the mystery of the zigzag of light at the floor. I'm sure a better crop could be done for that purpose.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D610
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern750
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution238 dpi
Vertical Resolution238 dpi
Image Created2020:01:17 08:03:54
Exposure Time1/30 sec
F-Numberf/2.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating1000
Lens Aperturef/2.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeSpot
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlHigh Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
actual photos ITT:

>>3596421
>>3596433
>>3596440
>>3599639
>>3599677
>>3601252
>>3601482

all the others have no subject, composition, intention or execution.

Also y'all need to resize your shit.
>>
>>3602385
lol. Jealous?

File: 38.jpg (671 KB, 1894x1420)
671 KB
671 KB JPG
ITT, you post pictures taken with shitty digicams.

Everything still matters like composition and lighting, but you have to use the shittiest digital compact you have, bonus points if you don't have to resize to get under 1000px longest side. Digital artifacts are not only welcomed, they are encouraged. OP picture has two dead pixels.

All gear discussion ITT should be about finding the shittiest gear and shooting with it.
129 replies and 60 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: P1010001.jpg (312 KB, 1000x714)
312 KB
312 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
>>
File: P1010011.jpg (251 KB, 1000x714)
251 KB
251 KB JPG
i prefer the way that kodak gold vsco looks to the other one.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
>>
File: P1010016.jpg (109 KB, 750x1000)
109 KB
109 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
>>
I present to you the shittiest of phone cameras, only reason I kept it is because the moonlight kind of resembles a music note
>>
File: IMG_20200117_163057.jpg (99 KB, 923x1337)
99 KB
99 KB JPG
>>3583959
I tried lowering it by blurring the fuck out of it, the tower was surrounded with fog to begin with so I guess it's fine in that regard

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareGoogle
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created2020:01:17 16:44:07
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Width923
Image Height1337

File: SIGMA-fp-_-featured2.jpg (687 KB, 1920x1080)
687 KB
687 KB JPG
Also camera launches that went better than expected.
>>
File: D3S_3833-24-105-1200.jpg (229 KB, 1200x920)
229 KB
229 KB JPG
>>3602402
Pic related is unironically better than expected.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
>>
File: 1445878233501.jpg (186 KB, 1280x980)
186 KB
186 KB JPG
>>3602402
the future is an endless stream of worthless phone snaps, taking billions of PetaBytes in the Cloud forever, never to be looked at again

oh wait that's the present
>>
The future is nothing but a light sensitive sensor inside a computer with a f=7mm equivalent lens. Everything including zooming will be done in software.

File: IMG_20200117_092838.jpg (2.34 MB, 2438x1806)
2.34 MB
2.34 MB JPG
Hey lads. My brother's brother in law got him this pic related second hand, is it any good?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera ModelRedmi Pro
Camera SoftwareMediaTek Camera Application
Equipment MakeXiaomi
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created2020:01:17 09:23:48
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
F-Numberf/2.0
Exposure ProgramNot Defined
Focal Length3.50 mm
White BalanceAuto
Image Width2368
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceOther
Exposure ModeAuto
Image Height4208
FlashNo Flash
Exposure Bias0 EV
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ISO Speed Rating683
Exposure Time6001/200000 sec
1 reply and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3602352
>Any digital interchangeable lens camera made after 2010 is perfectly capable of taking good photos.
pic not related
>>
>>3602368
>pic not related
the problem lies in the photographer, not the camera
>>
It's ok, you lose half a stop of light I think because of the translucent mirror, battery usage is higher than a conventional DSLR and the system is pretty much dead. However you can get lenses for a low price and the screen is fully rotateable.
>>
>>3602386
It was free so I guess it's always worth it
>>
>>3602352
>watermarked

File: bendagz.jpg (53 KB, 1024x576)
53 KB
53 KB JPG
2020 will be the year of Pentax crushing all the competitors.
36 replies and 5 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3601521
nice Tokina lmao
>>
>>3601521
>It's soft
Sad
>>
>>3596481
I bought a used K-3 a while ago still am excited to see what the K-3 III will bring
>>
>>3602379
>K-3 III
Have they announced the name of the new APS-C flagship?
>>
>>3602380
>APS-C
>flagship
choose one. (not the first)

Wasn't the point of mirrorless to be small and stealthy?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePENTAX Corporation
Camera ModelPENTAX K20D
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
PhotographerPicasa
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)60 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4672
Image Height3104
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:03:07 09:57:30
Exposure Time2.5 sec
F-Numberf/16.0
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/16.0
Exposure Bias0.3 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length40.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3213
Image Height2536
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessHard
Subject Distance RangeClose View
Unique Image ID1d76237526f0aa4d016cb5fb2431595e
102 replies and 11 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3601306
Fuji gear is so goddamn awesome I really want to buy this thing pictured because I want to have it and it satisfies some weird aspie mechanical engineering fetish but I have absolutely no reason to actually own anything like this
>>
>>3602021
bear?
>>
File: 1579270213366.jpg (81 KB, 500x477)
81 KB
81 KB JPG
>>3602243
>bear?
Bear.
>>
File: 1579216400714.png (338 KB, 1308x901)
338 KB
338 KB PNG
>>3602384
more like
>>
>>3602384
Where tf did you find this guy? He's from my irrelevant hometown kek.

File: DSCN6052.jpg (1.63 MB, 1440x1080)
1.63 MB
1.63 MB JPG
Hey /p/ can you guys give me some of your options on some of my favourite photos that I've taken over the years

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera ModelCOOLPIX L840
Equipment MakeNIKON
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width1440
Image Height1080
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2019:10:24 12:44:02
Focal Length10.40 mm
FlashNo Flash
3 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3601993
>>3601995
I like these ones very much. Big fan of the bird, but I just like birds in general so there you go
>>
File: 1579208542137-2.jpg (1.18 MB, 1440x1080)
1.18 MB
1.18 MB JPG
>>3601989

Did you edit this or is that really the white balance that the camera chose? It's really warm.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON
Camera ModelCOOLPIX L840
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2020:01:16 17:45:49
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length10.40 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
>>3602066
this is awful. please dont try editing again
>>
>>3602066
lmao @ those colors. Have you ever seen a tree before?
>>
forgot to turn down the hue on my camera

File: Screenshot_1.png (358 KB, 1223x848)
358 KB
358 KB PNG
So, recently a friend of mine made a picture and I loved it. I edited it and I'm happy with the result. I just can't help to seem to notice that the lamp on my chest seems off with the lighting. I tried using an extra layer of a similar filter with transparency but it looks dull.

Does someone have a good tip for me?
1 reply omitted. Click here to view.
>>
Apply an Orton effect onto the image, here is how:

Make a duplicate of the photo, exaggerate the highlights, and crush the blacks. Enough that it looks like a retard edited, though not enough to look like it was found on Instagram. Increase vibrancy by 50%.

Okay now that you have destroyed the image, apply a gaussian blur, enough that it is blurry, though not so much that it looks as though there was no image, to begin with.

Now, turn the opacity down on the image to 0%, slowly increase by a few percents at a time.
>>
>>3601887
happy? this looks terrible
>>
>>3602049
Imagine needing to be this much of a salt cunt to distract yourself from your miserable life
>>
File: output_levels.png (277 KB, 1155x850)
277 KB
277 KB PNG
Not an expert, but I messed with the Adjustments>Levels a bit
>>
post the original image i wanna see if i can do any better

150 replies and 22 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3602300
It's worse for low light
>>
File: Tokina85mm.png (157 KB, 700x387)
157 KB
157 KB PNG
It's official. E-mount now has a 7th 85mm AF lens option.

When Sigma and Tamron release new lenses, there could potentially be 9 different 85mm lenses on this fucking mount.
>>
File: get.jpg (6 KB, 320x194)
6 KB
6 KB JPG
>>3602345
Kek its a rebadged viltrox lens, just look at the optical design of the viltrox and tokina.
>>
File: get (1).jpg (6 KB, 320x156)
6 KB
6 KB JPG
>>3602347
Pic related is from viltrox
>>
>>3602347
>>3602348
I imagine they both got the lens from the same Optics designer, since both lenses are fairly cheap it might even be a new Chinese company, a Chinese version of Tamron so to speak.
Or maybe they got the lens from Tamron.

In any case I suspect there will be a difference in quality control and sample variation.


Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.