[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]

[Catalog] [Archive]

File: pepe-frog.gif (42 KB, 640x516)
42 KB
42 KB GIF
I don't understand. I've been taking photos and videos for over 10 years yet they still suck. I don't know why that is. I get told by family and friends my images are good, but every time I post it on the net there's someone there that says it's awful.

Do you all know?

(Side note to mods. The pepefrog image is related to photography. It shows him using a camera).
204 replies and 26 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: IMG_3836.jpg (257 KB, 1290x833)
257 KB
257 KB JPG
New photo cat eating food

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
CommentScreenshot
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1290
Image Height2796
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
File: DSC_0909.jpg (828 KB, 1620x1080)
828 KB
828 KB JPG
>>4312345
I dig that one. Its a good one. Can you describe your thoughts on my photo Zach?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON Z f
Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.0.1 (Android)
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)40 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created2023:11:10 11:10:24
Exposure Time1/800 sec
F-Numberf/13.0
Exposure ProgramNot Defined
ISO Speed Rating8000
Lens Aperturef/13.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length40.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
>>4312345
Still shit get gud
>>
>>4312345
Oh my god, Zach posted an in-focus photo. It even has DoF.
>>
>>4312345
Get even lower next time to get on the cat's level, breddy gud mostly

File: snoy.jpg (25 KB, 500x361)
25 KB
25 KB JPG
and even though i as a 40 year old millennifart boomer often shit on gen-z i think it is kinda cool. Just imagine them going to whatever social gathering they are assembling in, bringing out all these cool semi-vintage digicams that nobody gave 2 shits about until recently..
The market is absolutely booming right now.. they want it all. The shittiest model you can imagine? Guess what.. they want it and they want to pay more than yesterday.
In certain niche markets these things sell for even above ebay prices which is insane.
Gen-z is unironically making photography fun again?
It is also quite interesting to think about the conditions that made this possible in the first place. So what happened exactly? My viewpoint is the following:
Younger Gen-z social media users have only used cellphones for photography.. they have finally realized that the platform has limitations.. they look at pictures their parents took of them when they were kids using digicams and want that particular look etc, meanwhile the large camera companies have completely neglected this market segment thanks to plebs only using their phones. just look at Canon for instance.. they haven't released a single Ixus model in 7 years and their last hoorah was nothing special in terms of specifications so we have to go back even further to find their high end models. Other companies have done the same.. there is nothing to be seen from the likes of Nikon, Sony, Olympus, Fuji, Samsung or any of the companies that for years made these ultra-compact and cool looking cameras.
It find it all really strange. You have a generation that simply loves this type of stuff and nothing to sell them. Just imagine these cameras with updated hardware, maybe some fresh colors and "limited edition" varieties.
Also feel free to post pics of cool digicams.
137 replies and 49 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4312237
Sell all of them and buy a leica
>>
>>4312267
I hope you mean leica glass and not another digishitter.
>>
File: Egypte02.24-1146.jpg (1.86 MB, 3887x2527)
1.86 MB
1.86 MB JPG
>>4312267
>buy a Leica
I already have a Fuji XE-2, I'm good

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelX-E2
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)63 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Exposure Time1/500 sec
F-Numberf/6.4
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/6.4
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length41.80 mm
White BalanceAuto
SharpnessHard
>>
I found a F810 fujifilm the other day, only thing it needs is a compatible SD card. Anyone know what I'm looking for? I think this one might be what I need but I'm not sure.
https://www.amazon.com/Fujifilm-600002308-xD-Picture-Card-512/dp/B0000B35CK
>>
>>4312362
Yep. There are adapters that accept micro-sd though. Those XD cards have been out of production for quite some time so they are costly. When buying any XD-based digishitter on the used market one should always ensure that it has a memory card. Picked up one of those mju egg-shaped digicams the other day for the sole reason that it came with 2 xd cards so i have an extra in case i need it.

File: 1000029844-01.jpg (693 KB, 1366x910)
693 KB
693 KB JPG
Old >>4260419

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Makesamsung
Camera ModelSM-G985F
Camera SoftwareSnapseed 2.0
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2024:03:01 08:21:15
Exposure Time1/306 sec
F-Numberf/2.0
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating50
Lens Aperturef/2.0
Brightness6.8 EV
Exposure Bias-0.6 EV
Metering ModeSpot
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length5.90 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1366
Image Height910
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Digital Zoom Ratio3
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Unique Image IDR64LLMF05VM
81 replies and 54 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: 20240507_165710.jpg (2.09 MB, 2118x3761)
2.09 MB
2.09 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Makesamsung
Camera ModelSM-S901B
Camera SoftwareS901BXXS7DXBD
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)23 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height2252
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2024:05:07 16:57:10
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Image Width4000
Lens Aperturef/1.8
Exposure Bias0 EV
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
Color Space InformationsRGB
Unique Image IDD50XLOD01SM
Image Height2252
Brightness10.6 EV
White BalanceAuto
Exposure ModeAuto
Exposure Time3/10000 sec
FlashNo Flash
F-Numberf/1.8
ISO Speed Rating50
Image Width4000
Focal Length5.40 mm
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Light SourceUnknown
>>
File: 20240507_165331.jpg (3.88 MB, 3859x2173)
3.88 MB
3.88 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Makesamsung
Camera ModelSM-S901B
Camera SoftwareS901BXXS7DXBD
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.2
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)13 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height2252
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2024:05:07 16:53:31
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Image Width4000
Lens Aperturef/2.2
Exposure Bias0 EV
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
Color Space InformationsRGB
Unique Image IDD12XLOD00CM
Image Height2252
Brightness7.9 EV
White BalanceAuto
Exposure ModeAuto
Exposure Time11/10000 sec
FlashNo Flash
F-Numberf/2.2
ISO Speed Rating50
Image Width4000
Focal Length2.20 mm
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Light SourceUnknown
>>
>>4297388
So beautiful... Where is it?
>>
File: IMG_20240510_062309_211.jpg (3.87 MB, 4032x3024)
3.87 MB
3.87 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>
File: IMG_20240510_151310.jpg (1.51 MB, 2048x1366)
1.51 MB
1.51 MB JPG

File: IMG_3831.jpg (733 KB, 1290x1688)
733 KB
733 KB JPG
Flex your current vintage setup! Let me see emm! Photo is of my current Canon Av-1

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
CommentScreenshot
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1290
Image Height2796
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>4312335
LOL broke boy can’t afford a new camera xD
>>
>>4312335
a thread died for you, gearfag

File: images[1].jpg (5 KB, 168x300)
5 KB
5 KB JPG
I wanna become one of those "street portrait" guys who makes the videos I see all over instagram reels. Only issue is that I want to start a new account to do this, and don't have any street portraits to post to start, nor do I have any followers. How do I get started when people will inevitably ask to see my instagram when I say "hey I take photos of strangers for instagram, could I take some pictures of you?" and they say "sure, what's your ig name?"

buying followers is not an option since that basically gets your account shadowbanned.

Pic is not my image, nor is it even a very good one but it came up when I googled "street portaiture"
25 replies and 4 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4312279

>I think I'm ""ok"" at portraiture and I like it

post

>Like I feel like people are going to say no to me because they think I'm gonna put their images up in my goon cave or something

If that's how you carry yourself.
>>
>>4312282
I'd feel bad posting a portrait of someone on 4chan without asking. I don't carry myself that way but idk I guess I'm very self conscious. It's part of why I wanna start doing street portraiture, getting better at speaking to people.
>>
>>4312272
If you see a lot of likes on a "reel" like that, with no much content besides someone taking portraits of random people on the streets, it means they're constantly reaching more people through the algorithm and probably many are bots.
Anyways, do whatever you feel like doing. You might create some interesting content for future clients, who knows.
>>
File: DSCF8251c.jpg (1.04 MB, 3000x2000)
1.04 MB
1.04 MB JPG
>>4312279
>Do you mostly shoot mexicans?
no that was the only person i've interacted with whom i couldn't talk to

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelX-Pro2
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.36
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)135 mm
Maker Note Version0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2024:01:28 01:24:10
Exposure Time1/250 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/2.8
Brightness4.8 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length90.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3000
Image Height2000
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
Blur StatusOK
Chroma SaturationNormal
Continuous/Bracketing ModeOff
Auto Exposure StatusOK
Flash ModeUnknown
Focus ModeAuto
Focus StatusOK
Picture ModeManual Exposure
SharpnessNormal
Slow Synchro ModeOff
White BalanceAuto
>>
>>4311872
>How do I get started
1.kidnap
2.protrait
3.rape
4.post
5.repeat
>people will inevitably ask to see my instagram
hahaha no worries, they never will

File: JaredPolinFeatured.jpg (160 KB, 800x1202)
160 KB
160 KB JPG
Why do you hate him?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
5 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4312332
He’s the archetypical photographer the world doesnt need. First in line to be replaced by a drone with a snoy. And yet he thinks he has all the right opinions

Just so you know, any photographer with a clue about gear stopped caring before they even got a career. Listening to this guy is like listening to a taxi driver about racecars when you can ask an f1 champ wuts gud and get
>doesnt matter learn to drive
>>
>>4312332
stop shilling e-celeb kikes
>>
>>4312349
Weird, I watch his videos and I get the impression that’s the opposite, that he knows he’s a gearfag and shill and embraces it and he doesn’t seem to get too wrapped up in the bullshit mysticism of “le photograph” that other Jewtubers seem to. But I don’t know YouTube is kind of just on in the background for me.
>>
>>4312400
yeah basically this

jared polin is a taxi driver talking about sportscars
he talks like he knows everything but the only laptime he ever posted was 20 minutes around the nurburgring, counting the crash and the crying session, and one time he almost spun out and went over a cliff while attempting a "togue attack"

the extent of his photographic knowledge is setting up back button AF, bitching about autofocus and comfort when using 1200mm zooms, and applying lightroom presets. he cant even frame a shot or use appropriate exposure settings. he shoots with his shutter speed 2 to 3 stops higher than it needs to be, cranks the ISO, and misses the shot entirely anyways and has to crop it to save it. some people shoot for a crop and that's ok but he cant even center a subject sometimes.
>>
>>4312408
>he knows he’s a gearfag and shill and embraces it and he doesn’t seem to get too wrapped up in the bullshit mysticism of “le photograph”
that's exactly what I meant and that's exactly why he's hated on /p/ by some
sorry if it wasn't clear, working on my run-on sentences rn

File: 20mm-F18.jpg (33 KB, 698x477)
33 KB
33 KB JPG
Anyone have experience with wide primes? I was looking at either the 20mm f2.8 or the newer 20 f1.8
I was previously using a 12-24 f4 but it got damaged so I wanted to try something else

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
PhotographerAJ
Image-Specific Properties:
18 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4311441
I have the ZF, a Z7, and my Dad has the Z8. Man that Z8 is a bunch of camera to haul around. The ZF is as big as I want to go on a body ever. The 6/7/II’s are damn near perfect. ...the ZF’s size is different, bc they turned the battery to lay flat, so it made the body wider, but it’s nice if you want to snuggle a camera in a jacket pocket bc pop the lens off, and between the grip and the eyepiece the whole body is actually thinner than even my classic film cameras. I’m able to transport it and the Z 28mm lens in my light summer jacket pockets on the plane & into places where I’d otherwise not be able to get a good camera. Also the ZF has an incredibly good feel in the hand, that sounds superficial if you’re an aspie nerd that thinks the only aspect of photography is edge sharpness in ur photos, but if you’re a fully functional human being that understands why a Sony is a miserable camera to shoot with, then you’ll also appreciate an equally-spaced improvement beyond the old 90’s plastic & rubber blob body designs we think of as current. The ZF is a fucking metal brick of a camera and it feels fucking gooood to shoot with.
>>
>>4311876
I’m just pissed that Nikon shit the bed and put the ducking 24mpx sensor in it just like the Z6. WTF. They should have put the 36mp sensor in it. That’d make considerably more sense in their lineup.
>>
>>4311879
Gotta save something for the ZfII
>>
>>4311879
I personally feel that the 24mpx sensor was a good choice. Its enough for 99% of the work youre probably gonna be doing and.. Who doesnt like a big ass pixel you know.
>>
>>4311876
>i am a real person and people who dont like this camera are fake people
And you autists wonder why larp camera fanboys get bullied

Obviously I still use my MILC, but literally iphone cameras are fucking perfect for photography in general. You can even shoot RAW and have 3 native focal lengths to choose from (3 different lenses).

If the old magnum photographers could choose between an iphone or their clunky 50s film cameras they would've chosen an iphone 9/10 times.
86 replies and 8 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4312076
Your photos aren’t published.
>>
>>4312102
>t. pseud that follows einstein quotes as dogma and purposefully leaves his desk a mess to attempt to appear like a busy intellectual
dont forget to get a cat because a pseud said cats were for intellectuals and drive a tesla so everyone knows you’re into “tech” lol
>>
iPhone photo from a few days ago

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAndroid TP1A.220624.014.G781VSQSDHXD2
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width1080
Image Height2400
Image OrientationUnknown
>>
>>4312132
Is there really no way to turn off this aggressive ai image touch up, outside of shooting raw, which looks like shit on apple phones?
>>
>>4312132
>iPhone
Just use a more honest camera like the Pixel's

File: file.png (221 KB, 791x718)
221 KB
221 KB PNG
why are shitty digital cameras getting expensive now? did I miss some e-celeb video?
112 replies and 11 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4307416
>I'm too autistic to negotiate
What does this even mean?
>>
>>4308665
Means i pay whatever the seller wants. I look for underpriced items.
>>
Sold 3 digishitters to zoomer girls this week. Made a whooping $250.
>>
>>4308892
Skill issue

>>4309118
I hate people like you.
>>
File: IMG_2821.jpg (85 KB, 640x480)
85 KB
85 KB JPG
>>4307921
While most phones are perfectly good enough for snapshots, I do think there should be more compacts.

My iPhone 12 mini *can* take very good photos (pic rel) but I hate it so so much that it's using a wide angle lens and not a normal one. Some cases I don't mind it being wide but the distortion really grinds my fucking gears in others. And the ultra wide is a joke... what's the point if it only takes grainy ass pictures literally worse than some of my 20 year old digital cameras? And then having to adjust the exposure almost every fucking time to at least get a decent shot...

File: American-Robin04-0713_01.jpg (1.93 MB, 3442x1646)
1.93 MB
1.93 MB JPG
Old thread reached limit.
>>4269325

Post birds.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D60
Camera SoftwareNX Studio 1.6 W
Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.7
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern862
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)450 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2024:04:19 18:27:46
Exposure Time1/500 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating250
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeSpot
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length300.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width3442
Image Height1646
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
233 replies and 145 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: DSC_0114.jpg (1.11 MB, 3235x2152)
1.11 MB
1.11 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D700
Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.7
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)400 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created2024:05:09 15:03:00
Exposure Time1/250 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating1600
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Exposure Bias-1 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length400.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
Just when you think /p/ bird threads can't get any worse they go from snapshits to AI "enhanced" snapshits
>>
>>4312331
Blame mirrorless.
>>
>>4312376
Shouldn't you be in your morning classes now, lil grumpy bean?
>>
>>4312387
Shouldn't you be in a thread where all you do is argue over specs of gear and post no photos?

File: shore_5.jpg (325 KB, 1000x795)
325 KB
325 KB JPG
I went outside to take some pictures and then I realized something: there are cars everywhere and they are all ugly. All black or silver with this soap bar shape that disrupts the straight lines of the buildings. So when I look at older photographs and get inspired I realize these kind of pictures can't even be taken anymore unless staged.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS4 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width3984
Image Height3166
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionUnknown
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2010:06:07 13:35:01
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1000
Image Height795
3 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4312283

Fat people are also ruining it. There has never been a time in all of history with the amount of fat people as the west today. Also the population is rapidly aging.
I set up a shot, and if just clicked guaranteed it will have fat and old people in it. I have to setup the shot and then wait while people walk through until the rare moment without a fat person or old person.
Its crazy looking back at old photos with 100s of people in the frame and not a single fat person.
>>
>>4312283
That's because you have an idea of what it's supposed to be, and it's an outdated idea. Your functional knowledge is a fossil. Forget about all that and you might have an original thought and produce something worthwhile.
>>
OLD
GOOD

MODERN
BAD
>>
>>4312371
Yes.
>>
>>4312371
DIN SLOTS GOOD
PROPRIETARY DASH BAD

12V GOOD
USB BAD

AUX GOOD
BLUETOOTH BAD

7 SEGMENT GOOD
TFT LCD BAD

KNOBS GOOD
TOUCHSCREEN BAD

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

File: proll.jpg (446 KB, 1623x541)
446 KB
446 KB JPG
any photo posters

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width1623
Image Height541
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution96 dpi
Vertical Resolution96 dpi
Image Created2014:07:25 10:17:08
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1623
Image Height541
92 replies and 23 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: pano1-2.jpg (4.89 MB, 7923x2983)
4.89 MB
4.89 MB JPG
>>4312254
Now, a diptych is a bit of a bitch, i've got plenty of triptychs, so let's "subvert expectations" as the kids say:

this is two pictures, just stitched together, so I do declare that this here is a diptych.
In essence if not in spirit, and that's good enough for me for now.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width7923
Image Height2983
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2017:10:07 22:47:22
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width7923
Image Height2983
>>
>>4312254
Dunno what to do with my prompt. I'm >>4312020, a reclusive hermit in bumfuck nowhere. Not really in a position to shoot people at all.
>>
>>4312262
Have a pet or one of them Japanese anime figurines?
The key to artistry is to bullshit what you want to show into a given category
>>
>>4312254
I got 84, do I need to take something new? I'm fine with either, can knock it out tomorrow at a sports event if so
>>
>>4312262
pull up to the gas station and start blasting
>>4312257
pretty neat. i want to try more diptychs and serieses but i always forget to think about that stuff when out shooting

If you're not buying a DSLR you're unironically paying more for inferior tech because you were dazzled by gimmicky bullshit you will never actually use

DSLR benefits:
>OVF has an infinite refresh rate and resolution
>Has an actual depth of field preview so you can tell exactly what will be in focus, most mirrorless cameras stop after ~f/5.6
>off sensor phase detect leading to superior image quality
>larger, deeper grips
>more buttons
>lenses are mechanical focus
>glass has focus distance markings making it possible to get your shot in focus without even looking through the ovf
>manual primes are extremely compact
>have a built-in mirrorless mode anyway allowing for the only two real benefits of mirrorless, those being focus peaking and focus punch-in
>batteries last 2x-5x longer
>often have built in flash
>simple and well organized menu systems

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
31 replies and 9 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4311991
The absence of an optical finder is the outdated tech tho
>>
>>4312285
I know were this is going

I live in a free aka capitalist country therefore i can buy any dumb luxury i want, i can put thought into the things that matter and enjoy my taking and looking at photographs however i want

but please keep coping over what ultimately amounts to your own budgetary decisions though it's going to get entertaining when you inevitably invent a pseudo-intellectual artistic "ideology" to justify how you spent your money and reconcile it with your need to feel superior to others. surely, your purchases must have been the best ones, because you're the best. everyone else is stupid, wasteful, consoomer, goy, jew, cuck, something something, or maybe poor, dumb, nigger, idk - go on, say a line like that. and prolong the argument. you know you need that attention. such is the life of a narcissist.

or dont waste your time and kys instead typical gearfag

>inb4 narcissi thinks he has a comeback
>>
>>4312314
I'm not reading all that cope. You have and will never take a photo that couldn't look good or even better on an APS-C DSLR.
>>
>>4312305
What the point of discussion? Did I say that SLR systems are bad? No. Did I say that DSLR cameras are past? Yes, this is the objective reality. 4 years since the last two DSLRs presentation, while dozens of new MILCs have been shown in the same period of time.
>>
>>4312333
what was the point in you opening your mouth if you didn't want a reply? :A)

File: Canon-8-15-fe.jpg (148 KB, 590x439)
148 KB
148 KB JPG
>Be me, research fisheye lenses.
>Look online how people put them into use
>It is all just skateboard related content
Sure, there are some who are able to find creative purposes, but it seems to me like whenever someone intends to show what a fisheye lens is capable of all they can think of is taking photos and videos of skateboarding. How strange! Just because some faggots in America used them for that purpose in the 90s.
30 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
shoot a clown core music video inside a porta potty
>>
take pictures of the sky at night
>>
get really low to the ground and make people look super tall
>>
closeup sloppy deepthroat slime where everything looks pink and pastel colors and the guys cock is already huge but now its filling half the screen and bending with the barrel distortion and the girl is gagging and trying not to puke
>>
>it's literally only for skateboarding videos i saw when i was 15
okay so film that then don't get wacked in the face by a guys dick

I've seen these pop up once in a while o market place, or ebay for relatively cheap.

Are they worth getting for just dicking around or more of a hassle than anything else?
I heard the lenses are shit.
12 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>4312034
>>4312043
Oh and I guess the gf got a J1 because it looked cute and I upsold her from a point and shoot saying she could use my lenses if she ever wanted to (never did)
>>
>>4310793

>Winnipeg

I am truly sorry.
>>
>>4312030
I have a d60 and d7200.
I'm just curious for something that I can keep in my car or laying around the house or for like a birthday party, something that isn't my phone, I don't want to buy flagship phones anymore. And I thought a camera like the J1 would offer an alternative. I'm also more inclined to actually post or keep photos from a camera than my phone since I'm used to taking large amount of photos from my DLSRs and such.

>>4312023
The 1 series I think was made in Thailand, that was around the time Nikon started to really export production.
>>
File: DSC_0465.jpg (2.17 MB, 3761x2518)
2.17 MB
2.17 MB JPG
>>4312147
at least its not saskatchewan. this thread got me lookin up V1s on ebay, man, fuck.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON 1 V1
Camera SoftwareAperture 3.4.3
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Pixel CompositionUnknown
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2013:04:08 16:14:28
Exposure Time1/3200 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length10.00 mm
Image Width3761
Image Height2518
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
>>4312303

Yeah I guess vomit is slightly better than shit


[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.