I don't understand. I've been taking photos and videos for over 10 years yet they still suck. I don't know why that is. I get told by family and friends my images are good, but every time I post it on the net there's someone there that says it's awful.Do you all know?(Side note to mods. The pepefrog image is related to photography. It shows him using a camera).
New photo cat eating food[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiCommentScreenshotColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1290Image Height2796Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4312345I dig that one. Its a good one. Can you describe your thoughts on my photo Zach?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON Z fCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.0.1 (Android)Focal Length (35mm Equiv)40 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Created2023:11:10 11:10:24Exposure Time1/800 secF-Numberf/13.0Exposure ProgramNot DefinedISO Speed Rating8000Lens Aperturef/13.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length40.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGB
>>4312345Still shit get gud
>>4312345Oh my god, Zach posted an in-focus photo. It even has DoF.
>>4312345Get even lower next time to get on the cat's level, breddy gud mostly
and even though i as a 40 year old millennifart boomer often shit on gen-z i think it is kinda cool. Just imagine them going to whatever social gathering they are assembling in, bringing out all these cool semi-vintage digicams that nobody gave 2 shits about until recently..The market is absolutely booming right now.. they want it all. The shittiest model you can imagine? Guess what.. they want it and they want to pay more than yesterday.In certain niche markets these things sell for even above ebay prices which is insane.Gen-z is unironically making photography fun again?It is also quite interesting to think about the conditions that made this possible in the first place. So what happened exactly? My viewpoint is the following:Younger Gen-z social media users have only used cellphones for photography.. they have finally realized that the platform has limitations.. they look at pictures their parents took of them when they were kids using digicams and want that particular look etc, meanwhile the large camera companies have completely neglected this market segment thanks to plebs only using their phones. just look at Canon for instance.. they haven't released a single Ixus model in 7 years and their last hoorah was nothing special in terms of specifications so we have to go back even further to find their high end models. Other companies have done the same.. there is nothing to be seen from the likes of Nikon, Sony, Olympus, Fuji, Samsung or any of the companies that for years made these ultra-compact and cool looking cameras.It find it all really strange. You have a generation that simply loves this type of stuff and nothing to sell them. Just imagine these cameras with updated hardware, maybe some fresh colors and "limited edition" varieties.Also feel free to post pics of cool digicams.
>>4312237Sell all of them and buy a leica
>>4312267I hope you mean leica glass and not another digishitter.
>>4312267>buy a LeicaI already have a Fuji XE-2, I'm good[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-E2Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Focal Length (35mm Equiv)63 mmImage-Specific Properties:Exposure Time1/500 secF-Numberf/6.4Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/6.4Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length41.80 mmWhite BalanceAutoSharpnessHard
I found a F810 fujifilm the other day, only thing it needs is a compatible SD card. Anyone know what I'm looking for? I think this one might be what I need but I'm not sure.https://www.amazon.com/Fujifilm-600002308-xD-Picture-Card-512/dp/B0000B35CK
>>4312362Yep. There are adapters that accept micro-sd though. Those XD cards have been out of production for quite some time so they are costly. When buying any XD-based digishitter on the used market one should always ensure that it has a memory card. Picked up one of those mju egg-shaped digicams the other day for the sole reason that it came with 2 xd cards so i have an extra in case i need it.
Old >>4260419[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelSM-G985FCamera SoftwareSnapseed 2.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:03:01 08:21:15Exposure Time1/306 secF-Numberf/2.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating50Lens Aperturef/2.0Brightness6.8 EVExposure Bias-0.6 EVMetering ModeSpotFlashNo FlashFocal Length5.90 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1366Image Height910Exposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoDigital Zoom Ratio3Scene Capture TypeStandardUnique Image IDR64LLMF05VM
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelSM-S901BCamera SoftwareS901BXXS7DXBDMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)23 mmImage-Specific Properties:Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)Image Height2252Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:07 16:57:10Vertical Resolution72 dpiHorizontal Resolution72 dpiImage Width4000Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVExposure ProgramNormal ProgramColor Space InformationsRGBUnique Image IDD50XLOD01SMImage Height2252Brightness10.6 EVWhite BalanceAutoExposure ModeAutoExposure Time3/10000 secFlashNo FlashF-Numberf/1.8ISO Speed Rating50Image Width4000Focal Length5.40 mmMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardLight SourceUnknown
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelSM-S901BCamera SoftwareS901BXXS7DXBDMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.2Focal Length (35mm Equiv)13 mmImage-Specific Properties:Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)Image Height2252Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:07 16:53:31Vertical Resolution72 dpiHorizontal Resolution72 dpiImage Width4000Lens Aperturef/2.2Exposure Bias0 EVExposure ProgramNormal ProgramColor Space InformationsRGBUnique Image IDD12XLOD00CMImage Height2252Brightness7.9 EVWhite BalanceAutoExposure ModeAutoExposure Time11/10000 secFlashNo FlashF-Numberf/2.2ISO Speed Rating50Image Width4000Focal Length2.20 mmMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardLight SourceUnknown
>>4297388So beautiful... Where is it?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Flex your current vintage setup! Let me see emm! Photo is of my current Canon Av-1[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiCommentScreenshotColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1290Image Height2796Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4312335LOL broke boy can’t afford a new camera xD
>>4312335a thread died for you, gearfag
I wanna become one of those "street portrait" guys who makes the videos I see all over instagram reels. Only issue is that I want to start a new account to do this, and don't have any street portraits to post to start, nor do I have any followers. How do I get started when people will inevitably ask to see my instagram when I say "hey I take photos of strangers for instagram, could I take some pictures of you?" and they say "sure, what's your ig name?"buying followers is not an option since that basically gets your account shadowbanned.Pic is not my image, nor is it even a very good one but it came up when I googled "street portaiture"
>>4312279>I think I'm ""ok"" at portraiture and I like itpost>Like I feel like people are going to say no to me because they think I'm gonna put their images up in my goon cave or somethingIf that's how you carry yourself.
>>4312282I'd feel bad posting a portrait of someone on 4chan without asking. I don't carry myself that way but idk I guess I'm very self conscious. It's part of why I wanna start doing street portraiture, getting better at speaking to people.
>>4312272If you see a lot of likes on a "reel" like that, with no much content besides someone taking portraits of random people on the streets, it means they're constantly reaching more people through the algorithm and probably many are bots.Anyways, do whatever you feel like doing. You might create some interesting content for future clients, who knows.
>>4312279>Do you mostly shoot mexicans?no that was the only person i've interacted with whom i couldn't talk to[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-Pro2Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.36Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)135 mmMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:01:28 01:24:10Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/2.8Brightness4.8 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length90.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3000Image Height2000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownBlur StatusOKChroma SaturationNormalContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffAuto Exposure StatusOKFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeAutoFocus StatusOKPicture ModeManual ExposureSharpnessNormalSlow Synchro ModeOffWhite BalanceAuto
>>4311872>How do I get started1.kidnap2.protrait3.rape4.post5.repeat>people will inevitably ask to see my instagramhahaha no worries, they never will
Why do you hate him?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
>>4312332He’s the archetypical photographer the world doesnt need. First in line to be replaced by a drone with a snoy. And yet he thinks he has all the right opinionsJust so you know, any photographer with a clue about gear stopped caring before they even got a career. Listening to this guy is like listening to a taxi driver about racecars when you can ask an f1 champ wuts gud and get>doesnt matter learn to drive
>>4312332stop shilling e-celeb kikes
>>4312349Weird, I watch his videos and I get the impression that’s the opposite, that he knows he’s a gearfag and shill and embraces it and he doesn’t seem to get too wrapped up in the bullshit mysticism of “le photograph” that other Jewtubers seem to. But I don’t know YouTube is kind of just on in the background for me.
>>4312400yeah basically thisjared polin is a taxi driver talking about sportscarshe talks like he knows everything but the only laptime he ever posted was 20 minutes around the nurburgring, counting the crash and the crying session, and one time he almost spun out and went over a cliff while attempting a "togue attack"the extent of his photographic knowledge is setting up back button AF, bitching about autofocus and comfort when using 1200mm zooms, and applying lightroom presets. he cant even frame a shot or use appropriate exposure settings. he shoots with his shutter speed 2 to 3 stops higher than it needs to be, cranks the ISO, and misses the shot entirely anyways and has to crop it to save it. some people shoot for a crop and that's ok but he cant even center a subject sometimes.
>>4312408>he knows he’s a gearfag and shill and embraces it and he doesn’t seem to get too wrapped up in the bullshit mysticism of “le photograph” that's exactly what I meant and that's exactly why he's hated on /p/ by somesorry if it wasn't clear, working on my run-on sentences rn
Anyone have experience with wide primes? I was looking at either the 20mm f2.8 or the newer 20 f1.8 I was previously using a 12-24 f4 but it got damaged so I wanted to try something else[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:PhotographerAJImage-Specific Properties:
>>4311441I have the ZF, a Z7, and my Dad has the Z8. Man that Z8 is a bunch of camera to haul around. The ZF is as big as I want to go on a body ever. The 6/7/II’s are damn near perfect. ...the ZF’s size is different, bc they turned the battery to lay flat, so it made the body wider, but it’s nice if you want to snuggle a camera in a jacket pocket bc pop the lens off, and between the grip and the eyepiece the whole body is actually thinner than even my classic film cameras. I’m able to transport it and the Z 28mm lens in my light summer jacket pockets on the plane & into places where I’d otherwise not be able to get a good camera. Also the ZF has an incredibly good feel in the hand, that sounds superficial if you’re an aspie nerd that thinks the only aspect of photography is edge sharpness in ur photos, but if you’re a fully functional human being that understands why a Sony is a miserable camera to shoot with, then you’ll also appreciate an equally-spaced improvement beyond the old 90’s plastic & rubber blob body designs we think of as current. The ZF is a fucking metal brick of a camera and it feels fucking gooood to shoot with.
>>4311876I’m just pissed that Nikon shit the bed and put the ducking 24mpx sensor in it just like the Z6. WTF. They should have put the 36mp sensor in it. That’d make considerably more sense in their lineup.
>>4311879Gotta save something for the ZfII
>>4311879I personally feel that the 24mpx sensor was a good choice. Its enough for 99% of the work youre probably gonna be doing and.. Who doesnt like a big ass pixel you know.
>>4311876>i am a real person and people who dont like this camera are fake peopleAnd you autists wonder why larp camera fanboys get bullied
Obviously I still use my MILC, but literally iphone cameras are fucking perfect for photography in general. You can even shoot RAW and have 3 native focal lengths to choose from (3 different lenses). If the old magnum photographers could choose between an iphone or their clunky 50s film cameras they would've chosen an iphone 9/10 times.
>>4312076Your photos aren’t published.
>>4312102>t. pseud that follows einstein quotes as dogma and purposefully leaves his desk a mess to attempt to appear like a busy intellectualdont forget to get a cat because a pseud said cats were for intellectuals and drive a tesla so everyone knows you’re into “tech” lol
iPhone photo from a few days ago[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAndroid TP1A.220624.014.G781VSQSDHXD2Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1080Image Height2400Image OrientationUnknown
>>4312132Is there really no way to turn off this aggressive ai image touch up, outside of shooting raw, which looks like shit on apple phones?
>>4312132>iPhoneJust use a more honest camera like the Pixel's
why are shitty digital cameras getting expensive now? did I miss some e-celeb video?
>>4307416>I'm too autistic to negotiateWhat does this even mean?
>>4308665Means i pay whatever the seller wants. I look for underpriced items.
Sold 3 digishitters to zoomer girls this week. Made a whooping $250.
>>4308892Skill issue>>4309118I hate people like you.
>>4307921While most phones are perfectly good enough for snapshots, I do think there should be more compacts.My iPhone 12 mini *can* take very good photos (pic rel) but I hate it so so much that it's using a wide angle lens and not a normal one. Some cases I don't mind it being wide but the distortion really grinds my fucking gears in others. And the ultra wide is a joke... what's the point if it only takes grainy ass pictures literally worse than some of my 20 year old digital cameras? And then having to adjust the exposure almost every fucking time to at least get a decent shot...
Old thread reached limit. >>4269325Post birds.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D60Camera SoftwareNX Studio 1.6 WMaximum Lens Aperturef/5.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern862Focal Length (35mm Equiv)450 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:04:19 18:27:46Exposure Time1/500 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating250Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length300.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width3442Image Height1646RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D700Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.7Focal Length (35mm Equiv)400 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Created2024:05:09 15:03:00Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias-1 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length400.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGB
Just when you think /p/ bird threads can't get any worse they go from snapshits to AI "enhanced" snapshits
>>4312331Blame mirrorless.
>>4312376Shouldn't you be in your morning classes now, lil grumpy bean?
>>4312387Shouldn't you be in a thread where all you do is argue over specs of gear and post no photos?
I went outside to take some pictures and then I realized something: there are cars everywhere and they are all ugly. All black or silver with this soap bar shape that disrupts the straight lines of the buildings. So when I look at older photographs and get inspired I realize these kind of pictures can't even be taken anymore unless staged.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS4 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image Width3984Image Height3166Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionUnknownImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2010:06:07 13:35:01Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1000Image Height795
>>4312283Fat people are also ruining it. There has never been a time in all of history with the amount of fat people as the west today. Also the population is rapidly aging.I set up a shot, and if just clicked guaranteed it will have fat and old people in it. I have to setup the shot and then wait while people walk through until the rare moment without a fat person or old person. Its crazy looking back at old photos with 100s of people in the frame and not a single fat person.
>>4312283That's because you have an idea of what it's supposed to be, and it's an outdated idea. Your functional knowledge is a fossil. Forget about all that and you might have an original thought and produce something worthwhile.
OLDGOODMODERNBAD
>>4312371Yes.
>>4312371DIN SLOTS GOODPROPRIETARY DASH BAD12V GOODUSB BADAUX GOODBLUETOOTH BAD7 SEGMENT GOODTFT LCD BADKNOBS GOODTOUCHSCREEN BADComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
any photo posters[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS5 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image Width1623Image Height541Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Pixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution96 dpiVertical Resolution96 dpiImage Created2014:07:25 10:17:08Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1623Image Height541
>>4312254Now, a diptych is a bit of a bitch, i've got plenty of triptychs, so let's "subvert expectations" as the kids say: this is two pictures, just stitched together, so I do declare that this here is a diptych.In essence if not in spirit, and that's good enough for me for now.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Image Width7923Image Height2983Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Pixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2017:10:07 22:47:22Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width7923Image Height2983
>>4312254Dunno what to do with my prompt. I'm >>4312020, a reclusive hermit in bumfuck nowhere. Not really in a position to shoot people at all.
>>4312262Have a pet or one of them Japanese anime figurines?The key to artistry is to bullshit what you want to show into a given category
>>4312254I got 84, do I need to take something new? I'm fine with either, can knock it out tomorrow at a sports event if so
>>4312262pull up to the gas station and start blasting>>4312257pretty neat. i want to try more diptychs and serieses but i always forget to think about that stuff when out shooting
If you're not buying a DSLR you're unironically paying more for inferior tech because you were dazzled by gimmicky bullshit you will never actually useDSLR benefits:>OVF has an infinite refresh rate and resolution>Has an actual depth of field preview so you can tell exactly what will be in focus, most mirrorless cameras stop after ~f/5.6 >off sensor phase detect leading to superior image quality>larger, deeper grips>more buttons>lenses are mechanical focus>glass has focus distance markings making it possible to get your shot in focus without even looking through the ovf>manual primes are extremely compact>have a built-in mirrorless mode anyway allowing for the only two real benefits of mirrorless, those being focus peaking and focus punch-in>batteries last 2x-5x longer>often have built in flash>simple and well organized menu systemsComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4311991The absence of an optical finder is the outdated tech tho
>>4312285I know were this is goingI live in a free aka capitalist country therefore i can buy any dumb luxury i want, i can put thought into the things that matter and enjoy my taking and looking at photographs however i wantbut please keep coping over what ultimately amounts to your own budgetary decisions though it's going to get entertaining when you inevitably invent a pseudo-intellectual artistic "ideology" to justify how you spent your money and reconcile it with your need to feel superior to others. surely, your purchases must have been the best ones, because you're the best. everyone else is stupid, wasteful, consoomer, goy, jew, cuck, something something, or maybe poor, dumb, nigger, idk - go on, say a line like that. and prolong the argument. you know you need that attention. such is the life of a narcissist.or dont waste your time and kys instead typical gearfag>inb4 narcissi thinks he has a comeback
>>4312314I'm not reading all that cope. You have and will never take a photo that couldn't look good or even better on an APS-C DSLR.
>>4312305What the point of discussion? Did I say that SLR systems are bad? No. Did I say that DSLR cameras are past? Yes, this is the objective reality. 4 years since the last two DSLRs presentation, while dozens of new MILCs have been shown in the same period of time.
>>4312333what was the point in you opening your mouth if you didn't want a reply? :A)
>Be me, research fisheye lenses.>Look online how people put them into use>It is all just skateboard related contentSure, there are some who are able to find creative purposes, but it seems to me like whenever someone intends to show what a fisheye lens is capable of all they can think of is taking photos and videos of skateboarding. How strange! Just because some faggots in America used them for that purpose in the 90s.
shoot a clown core music video inside a porta potty
take pictures of the sky at night
get really low to the ground and make people look super tall
closeup sloppy deepthroat slime where everything looks pink and pastel colors and the guys cock is already huge but now its filling half the screen and bending with the barrel distortion and the girl is gagging and trying not to puke
>it's literally only for skateboarding videos i saw when i was 15okay so film that then don't get wacked in the face by a guys dick
I've seen these pop up once in a while o market place, or ebay for relatively cheap. Are they worth getting for just dicking around or more of a hassle than anything else? I heard the lenses are shit.
>>4312034>>4312043Oh and I guess the gf got a J1 because it looked cute and I upsold her from a point and shoot saying she could use my lenses if she ever wanted to (never did)
>>4310793>WinnipegI am truly sorry.
>>4312030I have a d60 and d7200. I'm just curious for something that I can keep in my car or laying around the house or for like a birthday party, something that isn't my phone, I don't want to buy flagship phones anymore. And I thought a camera like the J1 would offer an alternative. I'm also more inclined to actually post or keep photos from a camera than my phone since I'm used to taking large amount of photos from my DLSRs and such. >>4312023The 1 series I think was made in Thailand, that was around the time Nikon started to really export production.
>>4312147at least its not saskatchewan. this thread got me lookin up V1s on ebay, man, fuck.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON 1 V1Camera SoftwareAperture 3.4.3Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mmImage-Specific Properties:Pixel CompositionUnknownImage OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2013:04:08 16:14:28Exposure Time1/3200 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length10.00 mmImage Width3761Image Height2518RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4312303Yeah I guess vomit is slightly better than shit