[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
06/20/16New 4chan Banner Contest with a chance to win a 4chan Pass! See the contest page for details.
[Hide] [Show All]


Now accepting credit card payment for 4chan Pass purchases and renewals. Click here for details.

[Catalog] [Archive]

Does this look photoshopped at all? Look up Carlos Cordeiro for reference
1 reply omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3433908
Photo is a “supposed lawyer” in SC. I said look up Carlos Cordeiro because on this picture eyebrows look odd, forehead looks like he’s got horns, and glasses look stuck on. Appreciate the help
>>
>>3433910
Why does it matter
>>
>>3434245
Because OP has an axe to grind with this lawyer and the only straws he can grasp at is that he may or may not have had some post-production done on a portrait.
>>
No OP. And I'm sure the restraining order will hold up in court. Just leave her alone and stop posting dumb threads.
>>
>>3434261
Is this some sovereign citizen shit? Where if the lawyers business portrait is photoshopped then the state cant prosecute you because you're a boat and free to leave harbor.

File: DSC_0237.jpg (539 KB, 2833x1992)
539 KB
539 KB JPG
Remember me? I am the guy with the Lawnmower!? >>3430081 So, It's been 2 weeks since I've been learning photography and I really love this art form. I come her again asking for criticism as I would love to be better at this and correct my mistakes.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D3400
Camera SoftwareWindows Photo Editor 10.0.10011.16384
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.9
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern19624
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)34 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2019:02:17 02:08:17
Exposure Time1/100 sec
F-Numberf/5.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating3200
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length23.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2992
Image Height2000
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlHigh Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
1 reply omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3435567
Hello lawnfag. Good that you’re enthusiastic but post more pictures in your thread. Even the ones you’re not so happy with, write what you think went wrong, it will help you just as getting feedback from strangers.
The pic has a nice atmosphere, slightly unsettling. Try to elaborate on this feeling, taking other pictures with similar mood. There are lights and reflections on the top half but not too much going on in the lower part, maybe an object that is difficult to see in its details in the corridor would add to the unsettling feeling.
Btw, I’m the guy who replied “you must be joking nigga”, I seriously hope you’re not trolling.
>>
It's literally a fucking toilet
>>
File: wm5uyf85vkty.jpg (26 KB, 500x375)
26 KB
26 KB JPG
>>3435642
>literally
>>
>>3435640
No, I'm not trolling. The lawnmower... Maybe a little. I will try and post more images next time. This is only my second time posting on this board!
>>
>>3435642
>literally
>a fucking toilet
>as in a toilet that you fuck?

>>3435768
Yeah post more pics. Even ones you think aren't great. People will nit-pick the fuck out of them but rest assured that even shitty photos are better than the dozen or so threads shitposting about gear or what genre of photography is better.

File: wut.jpg (220 KB, 1258x838)
220 KB
220 KB JPG
What's happening here? Are they under some kind of embargo or what? Why are they not reviewing sensors anymore?!
X1D-50c has been kill, major new ff cams are released, and they're not even reviewing the new Sony selfie cam? Something fishy is going on.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 7D
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015.5 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width5184
Image Height3456
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:09:21 14:57:46
Exposure Time1/1250 sec
F-Numberf/5.0
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating3200
Lens Aperturef/5.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length35.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1258
Image Height838
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
13 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3434957
they probably are. that "angry photographer" crank on youtube is a great example of hypergearfag, owns 500 lenses, knows everything, and his photos are literal, actual garbage.
>>
>>3434945
I'm sure you wrote something in english but i can only hear fart noises.
>>
>>3434966
>literal, actual
that's some impressive raging
>>
>>3434871
How does DxO get any money?

I wouldn't doubt that some brands pays them a lot money to give them better smartphone camera reviews.
>>
>>3434871
>when will i get my shit meaningless score
>The Post

File: a6500.png (887 KB, 1000x705)
887 KB
887 KB PNG
Does /p/ have a n00b guide?
I'm photoretared, dont even instagram.

I got an A6500 a gift, don't even know what to do with it...

It has a lense, that says
>E 3.5-5.6/PZ 16-50 OSS 0.25m/0.82ft-0.30m/9.8ft O 40.5

What do?

Pic not mine
21 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3433763
point and shoot.
just don't get shot by cops.
>>
Don't listen to legal drooling retards like >>3434141

He's barely a photographer, just likes collecting shiny toys
>>
>>3433768
Sticky has absolutely nothing useful in it though, even Northrup book tries to be more helpful than that.
>>
>>3435492
from how I understand what the sonygger is saying, a6500 will have a price drop when a6700 is released, so n00b op should sell it if he won't use it
>>
>>3433763
Also, LENS not lense

File: pot.jpg (655 KB, 1080x1349)
655 KB
655 KB JPG
hi guys, i wanted to receive some feedback about my photos on instagram, i would love to read what you think

https://www.instagram.com/von.photo/
https://www.instagram.com/zelkray/

also about my first couple of videos, they are short trying to make b roll

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=krhHOTyM5zA&t=11s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4zL2xdMY2s

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D5300
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern910
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4000
Image Height4997
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2019:02:16 21:39:36
Exposure Time1/125 sec
F-Numberf/1.8
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/1.8
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeSpot
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1080
Image Height1349
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessSoft
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
fuck off shill your shit is trash
stop bokeh whoring, go learn a thing a or two from /vid/ about filmmaking before posting.
>>
>>3435731
thanks for the recommendation, well I think the point is to receive feedback when you start instead of when you are already good
>>
>>3435751
My friend feel free to come post it here

>>3432242

Rate.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2000
Image Height2000
Scene Capture TypeStandard
8 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3433826
SX-70 film is ISO 160
>>
>>3433834
my bad. I knew it was several stops slower than the more popular 600 film which I believe is ISO 640
>>
>>3433843
and by several I mean 2
>>
>>3433611
Is that the end result of one of those "build your own camera" magazine things - 36 issues £8.99 each (first one £1.99, introductory offer)?
>>
>>3435661
Nah, that's one of these 'modern' houses from the 60s.

File: DSC07943-01.jpg (2.13 MB, 1920x1280)
2.13 MB
2.13 MB JPG
First photoshoot with a girl tomorrow.
>Sony a6000 + Sony 55-210mm f/4.5-6.3
>Sunny weather, park, city buildings, 5-15°C
>Know her personally for little while, so no spaghetti
>ESDDI cheap-chink but servicable flash with a max sync of 1/128 (how the fuck can I get this to pre-fire/sync with higher SS without banding)
>No other gear besides a tripod (unsure I'll need it.) No reflector or buddy to help do stuff.
Red/blue/black/whatevva fukken colour-pill me.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-6000
Camera SoftwareSnapseed 2.0
Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)48 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution350 dpi
Vertical Resolution350 dpi
Image Created2019:02:17 00:10:03
Exposure Time1/250 sec
F-Numberf/5.0
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating100
Brightness8.2 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceDaylight
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length32.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1920
Image Height1280
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
>>3435633
>max sync of 1/128 (how the fuck can I get this to pre-fire/sync with higher SS without banding)
I guess you mean 1/125 shutter speed and not 1/128 power?
Max shutter sync is dictated by the shutter mechanism and type, for focal plane shutters it maxes at 1/125 or 1/250 for the high end models. There's no way around this, only a leaf shutter (or global electronic shutter) will give you higher speeds.
Otherwise, there are some specialised flashes (with "high sync speed"), that work by giving multiple small flashes during the whole duration of the shutter (and not a single flash that is "instantaneous"), so you can sync with them at all speeds. The compromise is, lower power output and more expensive flash unit.

If you want to "overpower" the sun/ambient (i.e. have most of the light contributing to the final exposure exposure coming from the flash), you crank up the power to the highest setting, shutter speed to the highest sync speed, move (the flash) as close as possible you can, and set the aperture at whatever your meter tells you. This way you'll have the smallest possible aperture, "blocking" as much of ambient exposure as you can, and increasing the flash output to keep the flash exposure the same.

Why are all of you obsessed with only photographing women you have no chance with? I understand that people are drawn to take photos of things that are easy on the eyes but, how is that only limited to your personal sexual preference? Isn't that more porno collection than photography?
I'm generally curious. Do faces and bodies in general not capture your attention?
>>
>>3435452
Well, everyone likes attractive women. As far as why I'd want to, is because I really don't work with people much.
>>
>>3435452
>Why are all of you obsessed with only photographing women you have no chance with?
Because they are all spotty, testosterone filled, no-lifes whose imaginations don't extend beyond daydreaming about Alamby's tits

File: DSC05035.jpg (893 KB, 2592x1944)
893 KB
893 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelDSC-W570
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2019:02:12 20:39:36
Exposure Time1/4 sec
F-Numberf/2.6
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating800
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length4.50 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2592
Image Height1944
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
Usually when I stumble upon such pieces of work, I set the picture on full screen and prepare myself some coffee (sometimes even an expensive bottle of red wine) and stare at the art whilst drinking my beverage. It really takes a giant idiot to think that these delicacies are appreciated by a quick 'image hover' on 4chan, when in reality one has to study it as if it were in a museum. Who would appreciate 'Starry Night' if it was on your $200 phone's screen (because let's be honest, if you're a regular in this board you're most likely poor) or on your 1080p Black-Friday-Deal laptop? Distance yourself from your own mental limitations and do something right for once.

Anyways, when I finished my drink I had to take a moment for myself, if you know what I mean. This picture has led me to believe that I must obtain whatever gear you used in order to take my craft one step closer to your masterpiece. What a magnificent photography you have created here, Anon. I cannot believe that your work hasn't been published in magazines, or presented in art galleries all around the world. Truly, a thing to behold, and it boggles my mind that you're not a tripfag (or else, I would follow your work closely). Even the title of this work is just... I... I have no words to describe what I felt!

Please keep us updated! This board needs more professional photographers like you. If only half of the idiots that browse this board would have an ounce of your creative mind, this wouldn't be such a barbaric, gear-fagging board as it is in its current state.

Thanks for making my day Anon, and I wish to see more of your art often. You should sign your photographs!
>>
>>3435590
hmm

>>3435588
yeah OP its not great, there's a vague composition but no real subject. Maybe if it was a part of a larger body of work or project it could be something, but it's kinda nothing.

keep shooting tho

File: 554x256x2.jpg (67 KB, 1108x512)
67 KB
67 KB JPG
So im very far from calling myself a pro in photography, i only like film photography tho. I want to shoot something like widescreen pics with a film cam, but i dont think that panorama is what i need. Basically i want a film photo cam, that takes smth-between-16:9-and-cierama format photos
5 replies and 3 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3435494
Grab just about any consumer grade 35mm P&S from the 90's. It was pretty common and trendy to include a "panorama" mode on compact cameras back then. All the panorama mode really did was put a mask over the film and viewfinder that changed your aspect ratio to 16:9. Outside just cropping every shot in post that's probably your best option outside picking up something like an XPan.
>>
>>3435506
the second option got me very curious - will it work only with Pentax 67? or some other film cams can be used here as well? if yes, which ones (preferably older ones, i love retro stuff)
>>
>>3435527
It's made just for Pentax 67/6x7 cameras, they're quite retro styled tbqh

Other MF cameras usually have removable backs that makes it not practical to adapt 35mm film to it
Besides that, Pentax 67 wide angle lenses are generally cheaper as well
>>
>>3435531
what do you mean by "not practical to adapt 35mm"? for exaple Yashica Mat wont be able to make panorama photos?
>>
>>3435564
They'll be vertical panoramas and not horizontal, because of the direction the (35mm) film runs in the camera.
Unless you shoot medium format film and crop. Then you can have horizontal too.

File: renhang.jpg (259 KB, 1064x1205)
259 KB
259 KB JPG
he was so perfect bros
peak doomer
16 replies and 12 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3435540
i think araki has a completly different style, only because it´s naked asians doesn´t make it the same kind of art
>>
>>3435540
lol no, are you fucking blind?
>>
File: images (4).jpg (8 KB, 299x168)
8 KB
8 KB JPG
>>
>>3435553
what fuck is going on?
stop post thumbnails.
at least download from tumblr, it's way better than google images
>>

File: bbc_dynasties.webm (2.91 MB, 1024x576)
2.91 MB
2.91 MB WEBM
How do i reach this level of scenography?
12 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3435057
Lurk more senpai
>>
>>3434944
Soundtrack

https://youtu.be/xSTePqMV2QU
>>
>>3434864
If you strip away the scenery and labels, it looks someone wanted to have contrasting motion in each cut.
>>
>>3434944
Walking side by side with death
The devil mocks his every step
The snow drives back the foot that's slow
The dogs of doom are howling more
He carries news that must get through
To build a dream for me and you
>>
Percy the Penguin had cucumber wings
"Sadly" he cried, "they won't do anything"
With endless devotion he fearlessly tried
To glide through the oceans and swim through the skies

Off went our hero to Polo the Bear
To seek his advice on the weight of the air
"The substance is void, its quintessence is bright."
The wise bear's compassion turned darkness to light

Winter's cold legions made snow fall in rivers
Percy, so tearful, could not feign contentment
Mournful he watched as the seagulls flew past
"Why was I born so useless?" Percy would muse
Here in this Vale of Heartbreak penguin's can't choose

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

File: osajohnson2.jpg (513 KB, 1200x942)
513 KB
513 KB JPG
Is this the cinematography board? Can we talk about lofi film? If yes, is it pretentious "born in le wrong generation" shit or is it a justifiable aesthetic?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2015:08:06 15:10:27
6 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>3434927
>lofi film
I think it's just wrong (not useful) to think of 'lofi' as a genre that encapsulates a certain aesthetic. No, it's not inherently pretentious to use whatever accessible means you think are appropriate for achieving your vision. Probably more useful to expand on your vision and unpack the aesthetic of what you see as 'lofi' if you want to explore whether there is any pretension in the way you want to go about things.
>>
>>3434927
>born in le wrong generation

You seem to have this deep insecurity concerning what other people will think about you. You need to drop that and make the stuff YOU want to make.

Like this anon said (>>3434936), make the stuff you want to make, and if you're happy with it then it's good.
>>
>>3434936
By lofi I meant minimal digital use.
>>3434939
Yeah true, this.
>>3434933
I’m sorry, you can go back to paying women to photograph them nude with no plans to sell the footage anyways.
>>
>>3435060
What a fag
>>
>>3435107
What a cuck. He doesn’t even try to deny that he pays women just to take pictures he will never even make revenue from.

File: Screenshot_55.png (378 KB, 583x257)
378 KB
378 KB PNG
Nikon Coolpix l100
FUJI FILM S5700
CANON Powershot sx100IS
They cost like 50 $
>>
>>3433463
>The one you have with you
>>
>>3433463
ask in gear, delete this thread, and you'll get answer

File: DSCF7992.jpg (1.3 MB, 2000x1333)
1.3 MB
1.3 MB JPG
Spent a day in Lissabon while travelling.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelX-T1
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)53 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2019:01:23 20:42:47
Exposure Time1/500 sec
F-Numberf/1.0
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating400
Lens Aperturef/1.0
Brightness1.9 EV
Exposure Bias-0.7 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length35.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
6 replies and 6 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: DSCF8245.jpg (790 KB, 2000x1333)
790 KB
790 KB JPG
>>3435145

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelX-T1
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)53 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2019:01:23 20:43:27
Exposure Time1/1500 sec
F-Numberf/1.0
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/1.0
Brightness3.6 EV
Exposure Bias-1 EV
Metering ModeAverage
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length35.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
File: DSCF8253.jpg (1.77 MB, 2000x1333)
1.77 MB
1.77 MB JPG
>>3435147

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelX-T1
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)53 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2019:01:23 20:43:33
Exposure Time1/1000 sec
F-Numberf/1.0
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating400
Lens Aperturef/1.0
Brightness3.4 EV
Exposure Bias-0.3 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length35.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
File: DSCF8257.jpg (998 KB, 2000x1333)
998 KB
998 KB JPG
>>3435148
And that's the end of that.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelX-T1
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)53 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2019:01:23 20:43:37
Exposure Time1/2000 sec
F-Numberf/1.0
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/1.0
Brightness5.6 EV
Exposure Bias-0.3 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length35.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
>>3435136
>>3435140
>>3435149
Favs.
>>
>>3435140
Quite brilliant.


Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.