File: DSC02495.jpg (1.95 MB, 4446x1984)

1.95 MB JPG

>>4301592
The III is hopeless for video, lol

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	DSC-RX100M3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.2 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.5
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	31 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:03:27 16:11:03
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	125
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Brightness	9.9 EV
Exposure Bias	-1 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	11.45 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

i miss my rx100m3 :[
I sold most of my digital cameras for drugs or music gear a while ago now. rx100 is what I missed the most.

Shame what has ahppened to the secondhand camera market, especially compacts

File: _DSC4201.jpg (4.39 MB, 5015x3134)

4.39 MB JPG

It will do 95% of everything you could ever want to do with a camera. Just get it.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	DSC-RX100M5
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.1 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	70 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:01:11 19:55:49
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/6.3
Exposure Program	Shutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating	125
Lens Aperture	f/6.3
Brightness	9.0 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	25.70 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>4301637
in portraits you have control over subject to background distance

just got gifted an rx100 II, been pretty neat

>>4297335
with like an rx100 III, you get slightly better than an aps-c camera + typical f3.5-f5.6 kit lens

>>4305023
took me a second, nice

I'm shitting bricks rn

>>4305023
Did you put a soya Jacob in this an image? WOW!

>>4304045
The only consistency with fucks like the one you responded to is their hatred of White people. You'd think they wouldn't bother with a slow board like /p/, unless one of them lost a political argument with some random ideological opponent who posts here and then whined to his associates afterwards.

They're not very subtle about it. They would've gone farther in this particular thread if they hadn't laid into the "le cowboy" angle so heavily and making their biases obvious.

>>4303312
you modified the colors too much
also crap compression
>Screenshot
looks like it's a screenshot of video not even a photograph

looks like some instagram reels shit

>>4304067
https://www.instagram.com/reel/C5g-xRdpbvv/
You were right.

>>4303312
Not on film 0/10

File: 100781780_295617584766971(...).jpg (29 KB, 1920x1280)

29 KB JPG

in 2017 I took a photo of my penis with the eclipse but it didn't turn out very good because i was very cold

>>4304122
>he now expects cameras of increasing technical sophistication... the actual results...usually remain far below the technical potential.

This is true of everything in consumerism. Boomers demand 4k oled panels then watch shitty 1080p, low bitrate garbage beamed to them by TV providers

People insist on building trucks capable of towing extreme amounts, with lift kits and other modifications for rock crawling despite the fact they will never use it for such.

Because consumerism is not connected to anything other than consuming. If camera manufacturer's released a new camera with the same specs as a previous camera. Despite the fact a large portion of the consumers aren't currently using the camera to it's fullest potential will be upset, not because he is being limited but because he no longer has a reason to consume and without a reason to consume he realizes that he doesn't need to suffer the job that he endures because it pays well. He doesn't need to make the 45 minute daily commute he suffers through. He can no longer justify having missed large portions of his children's childhood. Without consumerism, the very foundations for the modern life are knocked out from under it and people have to face the fact that they are deeply unhappy and have been tricked into living a life they hate. So instead they consume it gives the illusion of progress and a sense of a tangible increase in material standing to justify all the time spent doing meaningless, unfulfilling busy work for 40+ hours a week.

this is funny because it was probably a 4x5 studio boomer complaining about kids and their damn 35mm film cameras

>>4304288
It is pathetically easy to use a camera to its highest potential

Just crop, and expect it to still look good. Or turn the ISO up. Or expect your prints to look sharp close up.

>>4304294
way way, way way back when, people were buying relatively high speed cameras where the shutters went all the way up to 1/1000 (WOW) to take photos of landscapes and posed groups of family members at f/11. nothing else.

these days yeah its piss easy. point a camera at a dog, go to a sports game, be one of the million people who took an easily accessible community college art class online... but back then, they could not google, and the fastest sport was baseball.

>>4304292
>this is funny because it was probably a 4x5 studio boomer complaining about kids and their damn 35mm film cameras
..with a light meter

>>4304937
I think you made this thread to cry about trips in

OP here, I just really like this photographer and thought I could support him by recommending him to others. Calm down please, and keep on topic.

whats that sonny i dont read text posts on /p/

>>4304937
>brings up ambush out of nowhere
>cries about some lens
one peek at an archive tells me why you're jelly

>>4304953
Whats an archive just post a photo instead of some edited twitter screencap from /pol/

>>4304139

iPhone will fit your requirements perfectly. Nothing easier or better for taking video for elderly family members.
They don’t want to be messing around with tech trying to get it to play, they want something that will just work on their iPhone or iPad when they try to watch.
Also you will end up with so much more content since it’s way easier to carry around, shoot, doesn’t need any editing etc.
Trust me your family members do not give a fuck about bokeh or shallow dof

>>4304375

Also you are correct about online, every single poster is just somebody arguing to justify whatever they chose to buy and every content creator is just lying to sell you shit. Trust none of them. Flickr groups for a camera or lens are good to show the average of what they produce, YouTube will have some video examples but mute the video to avoid opinions.

>>4304375
Everyone already has an iphone
Everyone already knows they suck

If you're looking to save money in as many ways as possible while still getting a pretty good product, go Sony.
If you're flush with cash go Nikon instead.
t. Sony user

>>4304377
Flickr groups are awful. You can't conflate userbase with what a camera can actually do, especially not on flickr, or else you'd think film can only take boring photos of stop signs and digital can only take UWA HDR landscapes in yosemite national park.

>>4304849
Can you not fucking read you dipshit? Where have I ever said that the retro dial layout is superior?

Don't project your own insecurities about your body onto me

>>4304853
read the thread
>>4304765
>arthritis guaranteed design
>>4304631
>A normal white person in good health will have an even easier time using a Fuji. A normal white person in good mental health will also have a better time using a Fuji
>>4304616
>I'm saying that Fuji cameras are ergonomically superior for everyone
you're in the fujislug delusion zone where they think a failing paper company that relies on tiktok memes to survive ever had the right idea

>>4304840
Could you show us some of that amazon rainforest beauty that you captured on that ergonomically perfect Canikon blob? Surely you don't use it just to photograph weddings.

>>4304893
What's wrong with photographing weddings? Beats the underexposed bald spot snoozefest in /fag/.

>>4294355
>see work taken with a Fuji that looks great
>see “work” taken with a Fuji that looks like ass
>get a snoy instead

>>4286767
creepy alien vibes

>>4286788
I like the lighting and colors here but this should be perspective corrected I think

>>4286829
really nice lighting here.

>>4286830
creepy but the sky wasnt this red right?

>>4286840
cool lighting


Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

File: fixed.jpg (1.52 MB, 1351x1781)

1.52 MB JPG

>>4286788

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

File: DSCF8777.jpg (433 KB, 2048x1365)

433 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 22 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSCF8571.jpg (895 KB, 2048x1365)

895 KB JPG

>>4304671

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 22 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSCF8578 1.jpg (664 KB, 2048x1365)

664 KB JPG

>>4304672

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 22 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

I'm a noob so ignore everything I'll say
Comfy stuff but I'm not taking away much from it I guess
>>4303245 really dig this one though

>>4303244
interesting
>>4303245
nice composition
>>4303246
yes
>>4303252
yes
>>4303256
no, faggot

pretty decent /p/-tier photos. good job op

I can see talent, nonetheless most of it is BORING. Keep on trying.

>>4303240
Love this one,

>>4303240
Boring snapshits of your walk.

>>4304335
Are da jooz in the room with us right now, anon?

>>4304398
Who said anything about jews you fucking antisemite

G*d

>>4304249
not reading that shit

>>4304407
might hurt considering 99% of shitty amateurs (r)ape the new york school or new topographics, but it's truth. the 1% is just aping cinema.

>>4304333
>He's articulated very succinctly a disdain for the rudimentary.

thanks big brian. you must have experience huffing matza farts. I do appreciate your words, but the critic is obviously some type of highfalutin cunt.

File: c8054b9b-098b-4f06-b757-e(...).gif (330 KB, 400x211)

330 KB GIF

>>4304360
>Doing anything manually makes people think they're really photographers and more skilled.

File: Nikon-FA-3-2223555333.jpg (75 KB, 1080x672)

75 KB JPG

>>4297696
Fuckin neeerds hate seeing SPASM on their cameras bc they want to think of making image as being some exercise in purity. I love it. I shoot on programmed automagic all the time, jpg never raw, and throw out every third image just for lulz bc I'm ken fuckin rockwell and I am a goddamn photo theory arsonist.

Just don't use P you dorks, A is useful, S for those instances (you know em), B when you really need to get jiggy wit it. M when you just need to set A & S & want to fuck up your shit with some crazy fucking iso and make a pointillist painting out of your image because why not.

This shit is sophisticated AF. Matrix metering, AIS, SPASM, this thing is practically magic.

>>4304376
If you don't know how to shoot manual, it's okay, you can just say that.

>>4297696
Because PASM is dogshit if you're not a subhuman wedding "photographer".
Auto is fine though.

>>4304600
>Has a retarded gear opinion and brings up a vitriolic hatred of wedding photographers
Lemme guess, "just put A settings on every dial and make the camera look like a pentax k1000"
-Fujislug
-Leica lolcow
-Nikon Zfool
Call it

>>4304546
You could have always posted evidence of your extravagant wealth like your leica on the hood of your BMW in your 3 car garage but I have a feeling your dad doesn't let you in the garage

>>4304549
like I'm going to run around my house taking pics of expensive stuff just because some poorfag is envious of my 80 dollar camera strap
hope the bus is at least airconditioned in whatever 3rd world hellhole you live

>>4304551
>no, i dont even have a camera
protip, you can take a photo of your camera by setting it in front of a mirror.

>>4304559
anon you might be retarded

File: photo_2024-04-15_18-33-38.jpg (104 KB, 1280x960)

104 KB JPG

>>4304340

Strap!
The one in pic related is like 10€ on amazon. It's very comfortable because the rope is very thick.
The most important part is that it's very sturdy because all connections are megal.

>>4304508
It's not really abot dropping the camera. I like the strap because "sometimes" you need two hands and several lenses are not pocketable. I never carry my camera like this btw >>4304343

>>4303150
This. Just play with the settings, shooting the same scene to watch it change, you do not need to read shit and most photographers are schizoid midwits so reading shit might confuse you

Proper education was for film, especially film with flash, and yes even then the best photographers learned by experimenting.

>>4303409
>picture.with the problem
picture without the problem

>>4303067
Have you already read and understood the owners' manual of your camera? Those tend to include basics and how to deal with it using that camera.

>>4303079
That's probably the best book out there for learning photography. Read it, go out and take lots of pictures, then read it again.

>>4303067
>book to learn the basics


people on this board will literally do anything but go outside and take photos

File: CRW_0035.png (3.06 MB, 1440x1080)

3.06 MB PNG

>>4285524
>It is also quite interesting to think about the conditions that made this possible in the first place.

older point and shoot cameras have way more soul then cellphones. modern cell phones look good but they have crazy amounts of automatic post processing. also small sensors with high megapixel count has the effect of making photos look soulless. then you sprinkle a CCD sensor and you got a winner.

I think I helped start this trend and the A590 has been on of my favorites.

>>4303821
Marty’s mom really needed to do some hardcore gonzo titty worship porno in her prime and it’s an unforgivable sin that she didn’t tbqhwy

File: dt_CRW_0732.jpg (1.2 MB, 1920x1440)

1.2 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon DIGITAL IXUS 960 IS
Camera Software	darktable 4.6.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.9
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	36 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:15 14:20:57
Exposure Time	5029/1000000 sec
F-Number	f/7.8
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	74
Lens Aperture	f/7.9
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	65.54 m
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	7.70 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1920
Image Height	1440

>>4285524
Get ahead of the curve and start buying vintage DSLRs before it's too late

They're already more expensive because they were always expensive, from launch. Are you ready for the future of $1200 D800s and people paying near MSRP for old EOS lenses?

File: NPC photographers.png (1.53 MB, 1024x1024)

1.53 MB PNG

>>4304500
>Only $100!? This "film" camera takes infinite photos!
>Don't order that mirrorless until you've tried THIS
>REAL FILM GRAIN ON DIGITAL! Nikon D2x in 2024
>Which one will people choose? D700 vs Z8 BLIND TEST

i think you should build the meal around the angle rather than the other way around.
food photography is so extremely fake to begin with, its basically a diorama but its edible (sometimes it isnt tho lmao)

im really just talking out of my ass here btw ive never done food photography in my life

oh and stick to one light source to illuminate the whole meal, makes for good highlights

>>4299256
I like top down to show plating and portions, but the meal can't be hot or you'll fog your lens - at least from my experience shooting in a lightbox.
I got sick of having to eat my incredible meal cold to be able to photo it, so I just take a quick phone snap and chow down now.

>>4299256
Try using a 4x5 camera.

>>4299256
Your food'll go cold if you do this shit. Just eat your meal instead of being some posh git, leave photography for more interesting subjects.

>>4299256

An easy trick is dropping the food, you could of held a grape above the meal and photographed it falling, and then the money shot of it bouncing up in the air while the rest of the food gets slightly bumped.
Best result is you need a 2nd person to just drop the plate of food and then you shoot as it hits the table and the food bounces.