Laser Parameters: The lasers operate with a wavelength optimized for maximum interaction efficiency with the electron beam, with pulse durations designed to match the electron pulse length for synchronized deflection.

Deflection Measurement

Catching Mechanism: Positioned at 4.5 meters from the electron microscopes and 5.5 meters from the central target, catching mechanisms are strategically placed to capture the deflected electrons without interfering with the primary detection zone.
Detection Apparatus: A sensitive detection system encircles the central target within a 5-meter radius, designed to monitor and record the undisturbed electron paths for comparison with the deflected paths.

Experimental Setup and Synchronization

Setup: The entire experimental apparatus is housed within a vacuum chamber maintained at 10−610−6 torr to minimize air molecule interactions and ensure unimpeded electron travel.
Synchronization: A central control system coordinates the timing of electron and laser pulses to achieve precise synchronization, crucial for ensuring the accuracy of deflection measurements.

Results

Expected Outcomes: The experiment is designed to measure the extent of electron beam deflection accurately and to evaluate the consistency of the deflection across multiple trials. Initial simulations suggest that the setup can achieve a deflection accuracy within 0.1 degrees of the intended 5-degree angle.
Data Analysis: Detailed analysis of the deflected and undisturbed paths will provide insights into the interaction dynamics between electrons and laser-induced electromagnetic fields.

Discussion

Implications: The results from this study could have significant implications for the fields of material science and electron dynamics, providing a new method for manipulating electron trajectories and studying material properties at the atomic level.
Challenges: The main challenges anticipated involve maintaining precise synchronization across all components and managing potential electromagnetic interference between closely spaced electron microscopes.

Conclusion

This experiment pushes the boundaries of electron beam manipulation using laser technology, providing a novel method for studying electron behavior and enhancing our understanding of atomic-level interactions. The precise control and detailed measurement capabilities developed for this study represent significant advancements in the field of experimental physics.
Peer Review Considerations

Innovativeness: The experiment's design and the integration of synchronized laser and electron beam technology are innovative, representing a significant step forward in precision beam manipulation.
Feasibility: While challenging, the proposed setup is built on established principles of electron beam control and laser interaction, suggesting that the experiment is feasible with careful implementation and calibration.
Reproducibility: Detailed descriptions of the methods and synchronization protocols are provided to ensure that other researchers can reproduce the setup and results.

If for whatever reason you would want to use multiple pulses of the electron beam you could create an attosecond shutter via multiple nonlinear crystals, a primary laser and multiple secondary pump lasers to convert the frequency of the primary laser to a blockable wavelength via a filter. Basically the laser deters the electron beam going through about 3 nonlinear crystals then once it has deterred it for an attosecond the secondary lasers directed at the nonlinear crystals change the wavelength to something blockable by the filter and in which case it works the laser is blocked by up to 70% per crystal meaning .3 x .3 x .3 = 0.027 or roughly only 2.7% of the primary laser will pass through the filter.

bump

>>16141549
>>16141550
>>16141551
>>16141559
>>16142948

Fascinating!

>>16141549
Smells like chatgpt wrote this

>>16144236
I had chat gpt organize and put it in a format for peer review, I find no logicality error in what I have devised, thanks for your time.

For the detection apparatus Multi-Channel Plates seem to be the superior choice considering negation of the risk factor that is contamination of data via backscatter as well as offering superior locational data for the electrons that bounce off of the orbiting electron.

retyped and for clarity >>16144485

Title

Mapping the Natural Path of Orbiting Electrons Using Directed Electron Beams and High-Precision Detection Systems
Abstract

This experiment aims to determine the trajectories of orbiting electrons within atoms by employing a sophisticated arrangement of electron beam generators, laser systems, and multi-channel plates for detection. The setup is designed to probe the electrons with minimal disruption, allowing for an accurate mapping of their natural paths based on the trajectory changes induced by controlled electron beam interactions.
Introduction

Understanding the precise behavior of electrons within atoms is fundamental to advancing our knowledge in quantum mechanics and materials science. Traditional methods often disturb the natural electron paths significantly. This experiment proposes a novel approach by utilizing a minimal interference technique to maintain the integrity of the electron orbits during observation.
Experimental Setup

Electron Beam Generators:
Quantity: 36 strategically placed around a central target.
Distance from Central Object: 10 meters.
Function: Each generator emits electron beams aimed at a central object, with the intent to probe orbiting electrons without significant energy transfer.

Laser System:
Configuration: Lasers are positioned to intersect the paths of the electron beams shortly after emission.
Purpose: To deflect the electron beams by a precise angle (5 degrees) after the initial attosecond pulse, directing them towards a catching mechanism.

Detection Apparatus:
Type: Multi-Channel Plates (MCPs).
Location: Arranged in a spherical configuration around the central target.
Radius from Central Object: 4 meters.
Function: To capture and precisely map the location of electron impacts, facilitating the determination of their trajectories post-interaction.

Catching Mechanism:
Material: Lead shielding.
Distance from Central Object: 5.5 meters.
Purpose: Positioned to absorb deflected electrons, preventing them from interfering with subsequent measurements.

Methodology

Procedure: Electron beams are fired in an attosecond pulse, interacting minimally with the target's orbiting electrons. Immediately following this pulse, the beams are deflected by lasers into the catching mechanism. The initial, undisturbed path of the electrons is captured by the MCP detection apparatus.
Data Collection: The MCPs record the precise impact points of the electrons, and these data are used to infer the natural trajectories of the orbiting electrons based on the deviations observed.
Analysis: Advanced computational algorithms analyze the spatial data to reconstruct the electron paths, taking into account the known delays and deflections introduced by the experimental setup.

Challenges and Limitations

Technical Precision: Achieving the required synchronization and precision in electron and laser timing is critically challenging and requires cutting-edge technology.
Detector Sensitivity: The high sensitivity of MCPs is essential but also makes them susceptible to damage or interference, requiring careful handling and calibration.

Expected Outcomes

The experiment is expected to provide unprecedented detail on the behavior and position of electrons within their orbitals, potentially leading to significant advancements in atomic physics and related disciplines.
Conclusion

By innovatively combining electron beam technology with precise detection methods, this experiment aims to overcome traditional limitations in observing electron behavior, offering a new window into the subatomic world.

>>16144717
Still fucking reads like chatgpt wrote it for you. And how can you get enough information with a single target that gets blasted to bits?

>>16145753
I just had it formatted by Chat GPT, obviously Chat GPT did not devise the entire experiment. If I had Grammarly, I would just use that. I practiced ciphering for a few years and didn't write much, so I fell into disuse of commas and other punctuations. So long story short I feel like my writing might be insufferable due to run on sentences and what not and by reading through ChatGPT I'm relearning proper punctuation. Basically I devised the entire experiment and is by no means the creation of ChatGPT, regardless if it is valid in logicality this shouldn't effect your opinion on it regardless of punctuation correction or not.

>>16145753
The strength of the electron beam is 30KeV which shouldn't cause significant damage

I got the specifics worked out for what is possible and what is needed in terms of how large the electron beams can be. Essentially the smallest electron beam from a electron beam lithography system is 1.6nm which is perfect because it will take a laser about 5.5 attoseconds to fully penetrate it for the needed 5 degree deflection in trajectory. It takes about 15 femtoseconds in some elements for an electron to orbit fully around meaning we have about 15000 attoseconds to work with 15000/36 416 attoseconds per electron beam generator to work with. I'll run it through chatgpt again with the updated specifications so that there are no grammatical errors

File: hqdefault.jpg (14 KB, 480x360)

14 KB JPG

>>16141549
>Precision Deflection of Electron Beams Using Synchronized Laser Pulses for Trajectory Analysis
>Abstract
Now *this* is a thesis title.

Experiment Design and Specifications

This experiment aims to accurately map the orbital paths of electrons around a central atom using a setup that involves multiple electron beam generators and a laser deflection system. Here is a detailed overview of the experiment, including all specifications and the reasons behind each component's requirements.
1. Electron Beam Specifications

Beam Size: The electron beams are specified to have a diameter of 1.6 nm. This dimension is chosen based on the smallest beam size achievable with advanced electron beam technology, typically seen in electron beam lithography systems. This small beam size is critical for achieving high-resolution measurements and for the laser system to interact precisely with the beam without excessive scattering or broadening.

Beam Coherence Over Distance: The beams must maintain coherence over a distance of 10 meters from the electron beam generators to the central probed object. This long travel distance necessitates advanced electron optics to maintain focus and minimize dispersion, which is inherently challenging due to natural tendencies of electron beams to diverge.

2. Laser Deflection System

Deflection Angle: Lasers are used to deflect the electron beams by at least 5 degrees. This specification is essential to ensure that after interaction, the electron beams are directed away from their original paths towards a catching mechanism, allowing for precise trajectory analysis without interference from subsequent beams.

Penetration Time: The laser interaction with the electron beam needs to be extremely fast, ideally within 5.5 attoseconds, correlating with the time it takes for light to cross the 1.6 nm beam width. This quick interaction time is crucial for keeping the experiment within the feasible operational window of ultrafast electron dynamics.

3. Spatial Arrangement and Infrastructure

Array Configuration: The 36 electron beam generators are arranged in a circular or hemispherical layout surrounding the central probed object. An 8.6-meter radius from the center is necessary to accommodate this number of generators, factoring in physical dimensions of the equipment and operational clearances.

Electromagnetic Shielding and Vibration Isolation: Adequate spacing and shielding are required between each generator to prevent electromagnetic interference, which could alter beam paths or introduce noise into the measurements. Vibration isolation is also critical to ensure that external vibrations do not affect the beam stability or the precise positioning of the equipment.

4. Detection and Measurement Systems

Detection Apparatus Location: The detection system is strategically placed 4 meters from the central probed object. This distance is optimized to capture the deflected beams effectively while ensuring that the system remains outside of any potential interference radius from the central probing activities.

Catching Mechanism: Positioned at least 5.5 meters away from the nearest electron beam generator, the catching apparatus is designed to absorb and analyze the electrons after they have been deflected by the laser system. This setup helps in effectively capturing the electrons and preventing them from scattering back into the path of new or ongoing measurements.

Conclusion

This experimental setup is meticulously designed to map electron orbits with high precision. Each specification, from the size and coherence of the electron beams to the configuration of the laser system and the spatial arrangement of the apparatus, is tailored to address specific challenges associated with measuring subatomic particles at extremely short timescales. The success of this experiment hinges on the ability to control and synchronize each component with precision, ensuring that the setup can achieve its

>>16146333
scientific objectives

>>16146328
read for updated version for clarity on the intentions of experiment, I ran it through chat gpt for autocorrect essentially and it mucked up the first one slightly by not iterating the central probed object and the true intentions of the experiment
>>16146330
>>16146333