>having sex with women for pleasure is gay Is this true?
anyone who has ever had sex is a faggot whore and i hate them all
I wanna kill this retarded faggot with my hands
>>35549151Unironically, yes. Men are meant to have self control, if you cannot control yourself and resist urges then you are not capable of being reliable and dependable or a leader of a family. The main purpose of sex is making children, the pleasure is a byproduct to motivate us to make children and not go extinct as a human race.
the T in LGBT stands for Tate
>>35549151actually if you wanna resort to like christianity or islam for your morality then yeah it kinda is. especially islam, gay sex and sex outside of marriage is all grouped together under "zina". there are worse levels of zina sure but its like you start at the weakest (premarital sex) and end up craving more until you're fucking dead bodies. gay sex is somewhere in-between those extremes.
>>35549151surely if you don't enjoy sex with women as a man thats actually gay? unless andrew tate is secretly ace
>>35549205He never said he doesn't enjoy it, the post says "Oh my pee pee feels good this is great!", thus we can confirm that Andrew Tate's pee pee does indeed feel good and he does indeed think it's great when he puts it inside of a woman's vagina, but he thinks one should abstain from lust and find zen and resist temptations just as one should resist temptations of gluttony and not get fat, and as one should resist temptations of sloth and not get lazy.
>>35549194What about having gay sex with dead bodies before you are married?If that crap is "zina", are you a Zinaphobe if you disapprove?
>>35549245it's not racist to call OJ Simpson a murderer
>>35549230>>35549185Where does the idea that people having sex for pleasure is some modern degenerate thing? Obviously it's gone further nowadays but European kangs always had a harem and vikangs were known womanizers and rapists
>>35549151he looks like a basedjak
>>35549266European and/or christian civilizations never allowed a man to have more than one wife, there were always weak men getting corrupted by power or vices and cheating or taking side girls but it was frowned upon and seen as a sin for ages. Because we all like to believe that we are above our base animal instincts and that we are capable of pairing with a partner and having respect for them that holds strong even when temptations arise. Especially nowadays with so many failed relationships, divorce rates spiking, porn addictions spiking, I don't think it's surprising there's a market for people who are convinced that sexual degeneracy is a problem.
>>35549266probably because they didn't have reliable birth control so there had to be some social pressure not to flood the community with babies that would starve established families of resources
>>35549348Believe it or not pulling out exists and also cumming inside a chick isn't 100% going to cause pregnancy
>>35549422okay whatever, then it must be the Will of God i guess
>>35549185in ancient times it was felt that women were the illogical ones who couldn't resist sex and it was a man's duty to protect us. I think this is closer to the truth really but the influence of christianity has given modern society the impression that it is men who cannot resist sex and women who are naturally demure
>>35549151Children are disgusting and I'd rather behead myself with a rusty boxcutter than breed.
>>35549151Tate posts obvious bait and people fall for it
>>35549446you say this like testosterone isn't directly correlated to sex drive.
>>35549151Why does he love talking about gay things? He is probably in the closet
>>35549565all I'm saying is I can't resist sex so the men will have to help me
>>35549151Unironically yes in a wayTate is a lunatic but this take is one the of the least offensive ones