Why are luddites like this?
>>100134154>large language model>artThere's a thin like between luddite and retard, can't see it? You might be a retard.
Because you amplify their "opinions" with posts like that, creating a satisfactory echo for them.
LLMs automate all the stuff I don't give a shit about. They are literally useless
>fake booksIf a book has content with a beginning, middle and end, how is it fake?
>>100134202We might've discovered fiction genre, can't really tell.
The bad things he mention, you could argue the same about the internet allowing them. Also, some things he mentioned aren't even bad or unique to to this given technology:>influence electionsSo does New York Times and mainstream press. Are you complaining about how all journals are biased? No, of course you won't, because you must likely some cuck liberal how suffers from Trump derangement syndrome.>drive artists out of workYeah, so? That's what new tech does, I don't remember seeing you crying when streaming killed DVD rental stores.
>>100134299I am yet to see or hear an artist go broke because people started using AI image gen.
>>100134154Computers and related technologies have been used tospread misinformationinfluence electionscommit crimecommit wrongthinkIn conclusion, we should ban computers and any form of computing machines
>>100134330They were already broke - now they just have something to blame.
>>100134299nice picture but netflix was a dvd rental company who pivoted ot streaming once internet bandwidth allowed. if anything you cartoon suggests that you have to adapt to the new reality or go the way of blockbuster.
>>100134202Books by the foot/pound, they predate current LLMs though.
>>100134422printing press would fit this description too
>>100134154>obligatory complaint about how AI is used to generate cp>and, on the same list, at the same fucking time, complaint about how AI is driving artists out of workI see.
>>100134154History proved that Ludd was right though. You will pay more for inferior products, and you will love it.
