>[the H.265 video codec] can produce video with the same quality as an interframe H.264 codec, with roughly half the data rate and file size. However, H.265 requires more computer power to encode and decode than H.264, and so is not as easy to edit.does this mean if someone wrote a video editing application so efficient that it COULD edit H.265 video quickly enough for it to be convenient for the user they could make large amounts of money selling it?
>tranimeFuck off troon>B-b-but le muh anime websitekys
pls respond
>>100128991codecs are just zipfiles optimized for videosyou don't edit zipfiles, you extract a file, edit, then pack it back upthe "not as easy to edit" may be referring to way slower encoding, or "rendering"also, he didn't even mention mkv, I thought ExplainingComputers was a good channel
>>100129270so if the container isn't the video and the codec isn't the video what IS the video??