When will you stop giving harmful advice, /g/?
never
>>100128346I do that when coding on javascriptMy rule is to start doing that once a function needs more than 3 arguments
>>100128375That's harmful.
>>100128346Just calling something harmful because you can think of a use case is why technology has stagnated.
>>100128358FRBR>>100128346>>100128375yeah its quite rational in dynamically typed languagesp.s. remember kids, drink bletch
>>100128346You have to go back
>>100128481Do you have any better arguments? This one is toxic.
>>100128375In JavaScript it makes more sense to use an object as a proxy for named parameters.