Do you guys think Marvel will recast them eventually? Who could even replace Evans, RDJ and ScarJo?
>>143322552Yeah to bad they are gonna be paired with probably the second worst adaptation of the fantastic 4 and the x-men
>>143322552A stunning and brave black woman and two black kangz.
>>143322600How much will you seethe when MCU Fantastic Four succeeds?
Not before rebooting the whole MCU. The only reason to bring them back right now would be for fanservice and that only works if it's the originals. And eventually when they do start fresh they'll probably begin a new MCU with Spidey, F4, X-Men...all the properties that have historically been the real heavy hitters but which the original MCU didn't have to work with at the start which was why they elevated B and C-listers like Iron Man to stardom in the first place.
>>143322642>Pedro Pascal as Reed and a fag as Johnny Stormvery confident that is going to fail
I think it's about time everyone acknowledges black widow always felt out of place and nobody really cared about her as it pertains to taking a front lines positionit was always dumb and came to a head during avengers with the hero shot pan and she's reloading her little pistol like she's doing something
>>143322700If it weren't for that faggot Edgar Wright it would've been Wasp in her spot. Only problem is we probably would've lost Hawkeye for Ant Man too and he's actually based
>>143322673>real heavy hitters>Fantastic Four Two films did decent at best at the box office, with that half-ass "reimagining" being a complete bust>X-MenJust Endgame and Infinity War combined almost match the entire gross of the X-Men movie franchise.Only Spider-Man rates in that bracket, and the MCU was still crossing the billion dollar line before he showed up, let's not pretend that either the Fantastic Four or X-Men were these box office juggernauts anywhere near the same level.
>>143322700Well the original lineup for the movie was Captain America, Iron Man, Thor, Hulk, Ant-Man and Wasp with Hawkeye and Black Widow as support, but the Ant-Man movie was pushed further and they couldn't do it on time so they elevated Black Widow and Hawkeye as members of the Avengers
>>143322737>If it weren't for that faggot Edgar Wright it would've been Wasp in her spot.No, it wouldn't.
>>143322774Anon, he meant heavy hitters in the comic books. The reason properties like X-men, Hulk and FF were bought up in the first place was because they already had a footprint in wider pop culture.
>>143322774I'm sure that anon was talking about how the fantastic 4 and the X-Men were better known back then instead of the avengers, case and point no movie studio bought the film rights of the avengers cuz nobody outside of comicbook fans knew who they were
>>143322737>>143322778Hope was barely in Wright's version and was not set up to become the Wasp at all. It was Joss Whedon who almost included the Wasp in The Avengers as a contingency in case ScarJo dropped out as she was threatening to.
>>143322800Yes it would, they had storyboards, that hack wheedon was literally adapting ultimates
>>143322552>Do you guys think Marvel will recast them eventually?that was feige's original plan https://collider.com/kevin-feige-iron-man-james-bond/>I think Bond is a good example. Let’s put it this way: I hope Downey makes a lot of movies for us as Stark. If and when he doesn’t, and I’m still here making these movies, we don’t take him to Afghanistan and have him wounded again. I think we James Bond it.
>>143322800>nO iT WoULdNtFuck out of here, dumb cunt
>>143322829Scarlet Johansson was always a problem for marvel studios
>>143322857>>143322844See >>143322829Retards.
>>143322846>James Bond itWhich means what exactly? Blowing up the main character with a missile strike and replacing them with an afro'ed, girl-power, cardboard cut-out?
>>143322552Florence Pugh‚ Anthony Mackie and Don Cheedle
>>143322857>written this entire movie about The Wasp. Oops.I'm so glad Whedon got #metoo'd
>>143322886Exactly, now you get what he meant
>>143322886You are literally retarded.
in the same MCU continuity? lmao no.they'll recast the characters in a different universe.Just like how DC is recasting everyone by making a different universe.
>>143322886Change the actor without explaining or acknowledging the change. Like how they did with both the Hulk and War Machine (aside from a quick remark).
>>143322886he wanted to keep the character, recast and carry on as though nothing had changed like they did with rhodey
>>143322886Yeah, look at this black chick right here.
>>143322903I blame society. hahahahaha :3
>>143322924Still not confirmed
>>143322846so.... recasting James Bond by rebooting the series?
>>143322924>meterosexualYou're right. At least she doesn't have an afro.
>>143322908Yes, now they'll do actual straight adaptations of the Ultimates and we'll finally get Thorkino.
>>143322916Only problem with that is that the Hulk got recasted after his first movie, and War Machine got recasted after his first movie.
>>143322968They could still recast if they ever felt the need. Such things were never sacrosanct before cape movies became fixated on continuity.
>>143322552>ScarJoEasily the shittiest actor here and the most replaceable.
>>143322552seems natural to me. they will never live up to the original actors but that's better then captain You gotta do better senator and some afro African girl that happens to be smarter then iron man
>>143322552Remember in the aftermath of Endgame how everyone was speculating which second wave characters would step into the void left by these characters? The consensus from most was Black Panther, Spider-Man and Captain Marvel would be at the forefront of the next phase of the MCU.And then Marvel did nothing like that and the MCU feels rudderless and devoid of substance despite putting out more content than ever.
Eventually but I think Disney is getting out their checkbook to get both Steve and Tony back for one last ride, specifically the next Avengers. Deadpool & Wolverine interactions (also Spidey) might be enough
>>143324305>And then Marvel did nothing like thatBlack Panther died IRL, Sony took away Spider-Man, Captain Marvel didn't click with audiences, and then COVID happened.
>>143324633They didn't do it with any other combination of three characters either.
>>143322642How do you even think that movie is going to do any better than the previous FF movies did?
>>143324605>Eventually but I think Disney is getting out their checkbook to get both Steve and Tony back
>>143322817Comic books have an audience in the thousands. It doesn't matter who the heavy hitlers in comics books are, it doesn't necessarily translate into adaptations finding success with wider audiences. Hence most of the X-Men and Wolverine movies getting outperformed by Ant-Man. Ant-Man.Also people act like Fantastic Four was some pop-culture juggernaut before the age of Marvel movies started, when it was actually in the exact same place as Iron Man, a few cartoons over the years, only one even got a second season, and none of them well-remembered or having an enduring fandom.>>143322828Nobody bought the movie rights to the Avengers because doing it properly would require you to have bought the rights to the main solo heroes as well first, and set them up in their own movies first. Just on a conceptual and logistical level you'd have to be sinking a lot of time and money into it, there's a reason even comics fans used to think movies like Avengers or Justice League would never happen.People forget that Marvel did actually sell the movie rights to Iron Man, at different times both Tom Cruise and Nicholas Cage were in line to play Stark.
>>143324942>Also people act like Fantastic Four was some pop-culture juggernaut before the age of Marvel moviesBecause they were? They were a massive hit back when people still read comics and are widely considered the team that spearheaded the Silver Age and are also largely responsible for laying much of the groundwork for the wider Marvel roster. Their brand was considered highly valuable once.
>>143322695What's wrong with pedro pascal?
>>143324684Phase 4 is just Marvel throwing shit at the wall and seeing what sticks, there's no plan. Even the Infinity Saga was loose as fuck with the planning because Marvel likes to change entire movies on the fly during post-production.
>>143322552>Evans, Any in shape guy.>RDJ Any snarky guy.>ScarJoLiterally any female.
>>143325022Your argument is entirely based on their importance in comics and in the 1960s. None of that really mattered outside of comics. Talking about the FF's historical importance to the superhero genre and to the development of the Marvel Universe is like when they tried to promote the John Carter movie by talking about the novel's historic importance to early science fiction. Audiences don't care about that.FF's success in 60s comics didn't translate into success outside of comics the way Batman, Superman or Spider-Man had managed, and in comics after the Silver Age they've only really been one of Marvel's top books when they've had a star artist like John Byrne or Jim Lee on the title, it's not one of those books where the brand and the characters are so inherently popular that it's always a top seller.Marvel managed to keep getting cartoons made of FF, but none of them really took off. The idea that it was still one of Marvel's A-list top tier brands in the years before the movies, and considered on a level above Iron Man just isn't true, they were largely in the same situation back then.
