This photo is of a UAP captured by a US Spy plane flying over Iraq in 2016.Declassified and released by Jeremy Corbell.What does /x/ think, are these man-made or are they made by something non-human?What's the verdict, /x/?
>>33924913woops, wrong image
/x/ usually goes crazy for random lights in the sky, but we get one UAP that looks like a physical object and ya'll motherfuckers go silent, lmao
>>33924960
>>33924960O_O
>>33924913>>33924960Sauce pleeeeeeease
>>33924960A killer tomato?
>>33924960idk why are the shadows inconsistent?
>>33924960Isn't this fairly explainable, like a dark blue balloon of some sort?
>>33925232>>33924913>>33924960>>33925242>>33925253>>33925260https://nypost.com/2023/01/24/possible-ufo-caught-on-camera-flying-over-iraqi-city-of-mosul-in-2016/
>>33924960He's a pinball wizardThere has got to be a twist
>>33925272yeah tucker, who employed by the same people as nypost, has been pushing this shit for a while, the still photo doesnt really mean anything to me but it sure seems like they want "right-wing" people to believe in ufos
>>33925272Spooky. Thanks anon.
>>33925232Do you mean sauce of the ball in the first image? :3
>>33925464>>33925232>>33924913>>33924960
Thoughts on this? Recorded it myself. I messed with exposure so it's a little grainy.
>>33924960>Literally a lowly aerospace surveillance drone watching another more advanced space metric surveillance drone>Yup its a sphere
UAP’s are very gay and last year.
>>33925016I knowBizarre
>>33925812>that thing is soooo last yearIt is you who is extremely gay anon. Glowing, too
>>33925861Based
>>33925574If you're being serious it's quite funny you posted that.I stepped into my doorway about 5 hours ago, saw a blinking white light, just thought it was a strange helicopter since there were no green/red indicator lights. It suddenly moved far too fast after watching it for a few seconds, and I immediately checked flight trackers to see if anything was in the area (there wasn't)
>>33925861Is this what the midnight shill shift at anglin Afb has come to. Arguing with retards about the validity of fasab56 funded man made craft like the touted navy tic tac Thats what’s its face, had been working on for years prior to Fucking with that navy pilot?Back in the day you mofo’s used to know how to run manipulation psyop, wtf happened. You need to shape up or ship out. Greenland has got some good details lol, get it together.
>>33925977I have plenty of stuff photographed. Here's a collage of a light/tictac moving around. Most of the stuff I've seen aren't recorded.
>>33925272>source is a couple of podcastersmoving along
>>33926011Another weird formation.
>>33926011>>33926058stars?
>>33926011>>33926058Cool pictures, but unfortunately not compelling.>Most of the stuff I've seen aren't recorded.I've never managed to record anything myself. I've seen two up close (100m or less) that were just too interesting, I didn't think. Lucky I had friends with me that also saw one, otherwise I would have thought I was a bit mad.
>>33926072Do stars move? How about this: >>33925574What is that?
>>33926085Dude I don't know what I'm looking for in that one. I saw a light flash. Is there a path I should be following?
>>33926101Look at the upper area of the vid, you see a baguette shape?
>>33926105Yeah, unfortunately the video isn't good enough quality for me to really see anything. It could be any number of things.
>>33926111>It could be any number of things.Like what? Turn on the brightness on your device.
>>33926117I'm on a monitor that costs more than your mortgage, it's not my display lmao. Your video of nothing looks like shit, schizo.
>>33926128Why so emotional? Kekking hard at your brokeass. Saving money by low brightness :D
>>33926134Posting from your pajeetphone
>>33926143I have several high-end phones that are above your paygrade dummy.
>>33926147Yet you can't afford a DSLR to take decent astrophotography so we're not here watching grainy ass footage from your BLU phone lolYou have given us poor footage and that's why it can be anything. Garbage.
>>33926154You're the expert huh? You want the raw video file so you can use your editing magic on it?Post your crypto address so I can send you some change.
>>33926168I wouldn't waste my equipment on this trash lol. You've been schooled, next time come back with decent footage. I'm out.
>>33926175>I-I wou-wouldn'tOf course you wouldn't :D>I'm out.Brokeass in fantasyland.
>>33925307Sauce or meds
>>33925574i dont see what youre pointing out
>>33926203This area here.
>>33926213looks like stars or something desu
>>33926217>no clouds, blinking stars and an elongated object in the skyYeah I guess it makes sense.
>>33926227sorry i dont see the object. and stars twinkle, i didnt see them blink
>>33926246>and stars twinkle, i didnt see them blinkWhere the fuck are you going with this?
>>33926252im just trying to figure out what you were psting. dont get emotional
>>33924960I fly in planes a lot for work. I see these smooth spheres occasionally. Some can be huge. They like to hide in the clouds.
>>33926254Sure.
>>33926264why cant you explain?? is just pix of stars
>>33926273What formation is that?
>>33926290if u can believe it sometimes stars are just next to each other xD
>>33926058a week ago I saw a 3 point triangle 'star' formation that was moving so slowly it was barely perceptible, then when I noticed it was moving the 3 'stars' faded away.
>>33924913>>33924960It was all me btw.
>>33926262>I fly in planes a lot for work. I see these smooth spheres occasionally. Some can be huge. They like to hide in the clouds.Flying spheres glow in the dark, you can run them over with your plane.
>>33926308No you didn't.
>>33924960even though the source is legit its still not impressive. im entirely too sick of seeing ufo and alien evidence in a fucking blurry photo. we have 4k images of penis in vagina, beheadings, explosions, literally everything on planet earth except for aliens. i wanna see the government release an alien interrogation. i want to see the photos of the crafts and the species. i need this fucking closure and i know i will get it some day. until then its just blurry metal ball in sky or fake CGI clickbait. pretty cool tho.
>>33926349>the source is legitits a couple random podcasters LMAO
>>33926344Hey I tried to convince myself I didn't, but I take my dog outside to piss every night and look at the stars and that's why I noticed they looked out of place. There were 3 stars there that looked out of place, I thought they were moving but I wasn't sure, then they disappeared and I haven't seen them again
>>33924913This guy who is bob lazars handler, or is Bob lazar his handler? Either way he glows in the dark, why are they pushing him as a disclosure guy? Why do they use his full four names in the article? Why do they do that? Mark my words this guy is going to have shit revealed about him once he's got a solid enough association with the right. Everything about him is fake as fuck.
>>33926254>Stars twinklingretard detected
so im guessing the aliens send drones to earth to scout the lay about before they come themselves. or maybe this is an alien probe sent to take pictures and the aliens are far far away
>>33926147Why didn't you use them instead of the potatoe you recorded it on?
>>33924913
>>33926600I used one of them and cranked up the exposure so you can see better. Are you seriously whining because I don't have a 9001k image of an object in pitch black night sky?
>>33924913Looks similar to the orb video shown at the House intel hearing. Does not seem human-made. US has cutting edge technology, yet these objects spot them in a war zone, fly circles around them, and zip off with seemingly impossible capability. >>33925574Capturing UFOs on video is hard! Ignore the haters. A hazy patch surrounding lights is not uncommon in sightings. Could be the body of the vehicle or distortion from propulsion system or stealth. >>33926308This is a recurring type of sighting where the lights catch a person's attention, like they are playing, then masquerade as stars before pulsing, fading, or blinking out. >>33926404I can understand a dislike for them by some people, but they are not random. Knapp is an award-winning journalist who has been at it for decades, and Corbell has in recent years posted three different videos from military assets which the Pentagon has publicly admitted are real videos of UAP. He was even mentioned by name at the last House hearing.
>>33924913>>33924960They say theres a video.Anyone has it?
>>33925288How do you think he does it?
>>33924913>super reflective car>OMG LOOK GUYS ITS ALIENS/x/
>>33926187sauce on what that the nypost and foxnews are murdoch properties or that tucker has been doing ufo segments for probably 2 years at this point
>>33926727That's Goku
>>33926727thats just my son solo dropping from the battle bus to loot lake.
>>33925016>UAP that looks like a physical objectI don't think it does, I think it looks like glare from a reflection off of something -- maybe a windshield on a moving car, maybe even a puddle of water. Supposedly it is a still from a short vid -- has anybody seen the vid? Why release just one still frame? I worry that the answer is "because if you see the whole clip it is too easy to recognize that it is, once again, Fucking Nothing." But we'll see, hopefully.
>>33928385god DAMN YOU hamster ball bandit I want my spicy chicken sandwiches!!!!!!
>>33925574Which of those lights is the UFO? It looks like lights on a construction crane or some such, maybe on a foggy night, not sure what the flashers are.
>>33926262My dad works for Nintendo and he says you are full of shit. Also, Mewtwo confirmed for brawl.
>>33924960So it looks metallic out of the way it reflects light.There is a motion blur to it which can also be a auto-adjusting lens failure as something much smaller flies past much faster than the lens is already adjusted for.Interesting location to have this happen.I reckon the future civilizations travel back to maintain the timelines or something as such.There is still hope. Gj
>>33925016>yall
>>33924960GOTTA GO FAST
yes, they-r-real
>>33927013What makes him so good?!
>>33929361>glare>off something>a glare never fucking seen before>but yes, IT'S A GLAREfucking skeptics are transparent, if you want to discredit the photo, claim it's shopped or cgi, or fucking AI'd, that would make a lot more sense than a fucking glare the likes I've never seen in my entire life, and guarantee you haven't seen neither.fucking update your algorithms, bots.
>>33925574Maybe my screen settings...but I see a Triangle UFO, you can make out the edges of the shape.
>>33924960I'm going to need to see the video.This one frame doesn't tell me much.
>>33928385>CorbellDude looks like he should be tending a hipster IPA bar, one with exposed brick walls.
>>33928385He’s weaponizing the asiago ranch
>>33925016Because it doesn’t look like it’s more than 2 centimeters across
will DROP another one
>>33926011you too anon? i've combed through your vid to see similarities, there's a hypothesis I'm building, and i think your triangular vid supports it.
>>33926011>>33932090so basically, amongst many authentic UFO sightings, there are secondary/tertiary sightings that aren't readily apparent upon initial - even multiple - viewing. notice that in the first image, there is a light/orb in the top left, then in the second pic there is on in the lower right quadrant, but both flick in and out and shadow the main "UFO" object
>>33924913this is how it looks close up.
>>33926664I'm going to need a video, looks like a small flooded area of the street reflecting thr sun
>>33932321that's sputnik, well poisoner
>>33924960maybe that kanye guy knows something he seems to like the blue spheres
>>33928462Wikipedia should answer your first question, one way or another. For the second question, type Tucker UFO into YouTube and check the dates. They go back at least 3 years.
