Why are there no good UFO videos?
if there were good videos in the first place there would be no kind of FO being U
>>28406427Now post a source
>>28406458Pretty interesting natural phenomena.
>>28406472So no source because it's fake and gay. Just like your fake and gay video you just posted again.
>>28406505yup. It's all fake and gay.
>>28406541You will never be smart enough to be a rocket scientist.
>>28406599The highlight of you life is shitposting on /x/?
>>28406611You will never be smart enough to be an engineer.
>>28406498What was the outcome?
>>28406483>>28406498This only confirms /x/ is the shittest board. Even the pony faggots are better
>>28406603is this real?
>>28406269because ufos are alternate dimension objects similar to dirt in your eyes
>>28406710Yes, it was all over the national news for a while. Are you retarded or something?
>>28406269Why are you so godamn stupid anon? https://abcnews.go.com/International/ufo-china-closes-airport-prompts-investigation/story?id=11159531
>>28406269Because a good ufo videos becomes an airplane or balloon or whatever
>>28406453>>28406427That's the one that somebody yesterday was claiming was from a "fake UFO" contest? Did anybody ever back up that claim?
>>28406710It is. There is a weather Doppler Radar site in the center of the weird circle. It glitched out, and that happened.
>>28408244IF I SEE THAT FUCKING LED SHOWER HEAD ONE MORE TIME...
Guys, I think a lot of you missed what OP was asking. He didn't ask for lots of examples of what he is talking about, he asked why is this all we got, in an era when everybody has a decent camera in their pocket?
UFOs are 100% fake that's why, what you see in the sky is just simply tech that you're not aware of and yes they will try to pull a fake alien invasion and that's why it is important to show the general public that the serpents are already here, not in the sky, not on the light in the sky known as the moon but here already, here as in on earth and I will challenge anyone to prove me wrong.
>>28408270post debunk links then pussy.
>>28408364We don't have any technology like UFOs or we'd be using it.
>>28406269>Why are there no good UFO videos?Go outside with your cellphone right now and record a plane flying by, look at the pics or video you made. It will look like crap. Cellphones made to snap selfies in the bathroom mirror. inB4: I carry a high speed zoom capable professional grade movie camera around with me all the time
>>28408409You don't know what technology is available but I'm certain what is available dwarfs what you see as UFOs in the sky.
>>28406514this actually looks like cgi
>>28408460>You don't know what technology is availableWe do, or at least we can speculate.Nobody has invented a new physics. We still fly planes by rapidly expanding gasses and using aerodynamic forces to create lift. This is still the forefront of engineering. Most of the current research is about improving materials and mechanisms to make all of this more efficient. UFOs are typically reported as having no exhaust, heat signatures, and movement that implies they don't need air to fly. To believe what you believe, you have to assume that somebody can magically hidden a whole new physics paradigm and that we train the best engineers in outdated concepts.
>>28406514clearly fake as fuck
>>28408530Are you aware that all commercial and miltary grade aircraft can be controlled from ground level? What do you know about sonic booms? What is the science behind it? Can you tell me about the nitrogen gas located in the joints? If what I'm saying is correct then all militaries worldwide work together hand in hand by sharing flight data and location which means if my theory is correct on UFOs then they all work together on that too just like they did with bs-19.
>>28406269Several reasons.>Phone cameras don’t have HD zoom >The electric magnetic field that surrounds the ship and enables anti gravity obscured the vision from the ground making them appear as glowing orbs from far away>They don’t fly low enough >People are not usually looking for them
>>28408601>then all militaries worldwide work together hand in hand
>>28408601Dude you're retarded
>>28408443That's largely true. But it leaves us with crap pictures that don't prove anything, whether or not there is anything there to prove. "True believers" hurt their cause by embracing clumsy fakes and shouting hat yet another unfocused blob that could be anything is definitive proof of something. The first job af anybody interested in UFOs is to throw out the shitty non-evidence as fast as possible. It's not just government disinfo that confuses folks, it's the intentional and unintentional disinfo that UFO enthusiasts insist is important evidence that fucks up the field.
>>28408649So that's the best you've got? You would think that if I make a statement like that then I am somewhat aware of what I'm talking about and I'll defend my stance against anyone on that, bring your number 1 so-called expert on the topic in to try and debunk what I just stated.
>>28408711I'm not going to argue with a guy who thinks all the worlds militaries are working together. You're either a retard or detached from reality. Got better things to do.
>>28408735Go and find someone who is involved in the airforce, bring them here and let's put my theory to the test then instead of calling me retarded.
>>28408530>To believe what you believe, you have to assume that somebody can magically hidden a whole new physics paradigm and that we train the best engineers in outdated concepts.They are, look up Gary McKinnon the hacker who broke into a bunch of government computer systems and says he saw partial pictures of US operated space ships and a crew manifest before he was forcefully logged off by someone operating the terminal he had remoted into. The US government still wants his ass for that and its been stuck in UK courts for almost 20 years. I know youll call me a gay larper or something but I had a buddy that was a mechanic in the air force that talked about how back in Iraq they would force everyone off the runway for a certain kind of aircraft (he got to work on U-2's and couldnt even see it). He talked about how everyone on the airfield nicknamed it the flying Dorito because it was triangle shaped and had no means of obvious propulsion. The last flying Dorito was a flying wing design and was supposed to have been shitcanned in the 60's. That experience turned him into a full blown conspiracy nut and I wouldnt be surprised if he browsed this shithole. My boss was an artilleryman and likes to keep up with military news. He saw an article a few years back about a new artillery shell that would listen for engine noises or the sounds of tracks reverberating through ground. He would laugh and talk about how he was firing those shells at tanks 20 years ago during the ground war. Those 2 stories really convinced me that the government hides advanced tech. These 2 men were just grunts, imagine what kind of tech their superiors know about.
>>28406269because you have to be part of the club to see the good onesya ain't
>>28406269There's no such thing as alien spacecraft.
>>28406505It's a real video, it's just not a green screen. It's just a grid they use on the ISS to demonstrate shit.https://youtu.be/0iAaMyWq5T4?t=240
Not a video, but probably the best close up series of photos.
>be a little kid long time ago>remember seeing a famous fake photograph of a "flying saucer">disappointed that it's fake, but also kind of fun because it's so iconic, can make out distant clouds, hills, shitty barn at edge of frame>recently-get job in McMinnville, Oregon> research McMinnville online>local hipster brewpub/hotel has an annual "UFO" festival>turns out the famous photos are from McMinnville>actually a town a couple miles down the road, but close enoughI feel a weird sense of nostalgia and pride.
>>28411098It looks so primitive I literally said "what the fuck"
>>28406269The fact that the US government is confirming the existence of UFOs, makes me believe that they are fake or something subversive. I HATE THE ALIENS I HATE THE ALIENS!!!
>>28406555This is from TV show lol
>>28406269Because literally EVERY flying thing has been identified, you learning-disabled mongoloid. Go back to remedial school and learn what a fucking acronym is. Start with this one: KYS
>>28411588>he's never seen oneI'd love to see your mental gymnastics then
I'm a ufo wtiness and this pic is the best one I've ever seen. There's other good ones, but this is the most similar to the ones I've seen.
Why are there no good videos of UFOs landing and people walking inside them and having sex with ayyys?That's how you know it's fake.
>>28406593Those giant aliens sure do love them some golf.
>>28406458Slight ripples in a reflection on a body of water.
>>28406514Gake and fay
>>28411125You can see the fucking string
>>28406269If you believe anything mick west says you are dumber than any tinfoil.
>>28406269There are a crap ton but they get deleted after a week or so if they get views...The best way to find the best ufo clips is searching "ufo" in YouTube then set upload date to past 24 hours and put newest uploads 1st...profit>Sometimes instead of "ufo" i put different languages version of the phrase like "ovni" for example gets some good results >also there will be a shit ton 3rdphaseofmoon type fakes you sometimes have to sift through so dont say i didn't warn u
>>28406603This is what happens when you burp into a microwave and heat it up
>>28411003holy fucking shit where is this from I saw something exactly like this
>>28406269https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xZSCW4VIk8Skip to: 30 secondsI found this strange Japanese compilation of UFO videos. Eh cool
>>28406483This is a pretty bad larp to be fair though, theres so many things wrong on the 1st read through...>they have no clue what its made out of>but they know what colors it reflectsIf they knew that they would he able to scientifically find out what components its made of...>friend died TODAY>i already have all the details including how fast the car was going...>my deadmans switch is a 4chan post and not something that could actually go viral like a video that could be saved and shared on any media sharing siteThis is why no one bothers...newfriends give us literally no evidence and expect people to just buy a convincing story...
>>28411098>>28411115>>28411125Looks flimsy af, that wouldn't even make it past the atmosphere. Lmao it even has little windows, so that the martians can see outside of course.
>>28406593Why does it look exactly like a golf club
The US navy has more than just cameras you know.They caught them on radar doing things we can't touch.
because generally, when you see a UFO, it's that you can't identify what you're seeing, and you're kind of stupid and insane, so everyone and everything is out to get you. most people just figure things out. oh, shit, it was a meteor. hey, planes exist. idk, man. what did the aliens ever do to you?
>>28412814what the fuck are you talking about
>>28411019why wouldnt there be? to assume we are the only ones in the universe and that no one besides us has the ability to go to space is quite the arrogant stance to take.
>>28408340Extremely clear video tends to be passed off as fake due to the crafts looking so symmetrical and shiny it is admittedly hard to distinguish them from a cgi fakeKinda like this>>28408365>>28411098>>28411125And these>>28412715>>28412493Are 100% skydivers with flares to spot eachother and for show...its been debunked a few times after videos started popping up a lot, you can see skydivers perspectives
>>28411719its that one of the gulf breeze photos?
>>28406269Because no one can afford to buy an Iphone 12 plus anon.
>>28406498Did anyone follow the links?
>>28406269It's almost as if the government is making it all up. Sincerely, THE MASTER.
>>28406611Looked like a couple of llamas having a drink.
>>28408364Incredibly redpilled>>28408409Incredibly bluepilled
Someone post the fucking Turkish webm already
OP's picture looks like a retard lmfaowho is that
>>28412856No it isn't. The explanation is fucking retarded.
>>28413160Mick West, video game designer from Neversoft (Spider-Man, Tony Hawk, Guitar Hero) turned professional skeptic.
>>28411003Clearly sky divers
>>28411125You can see the strings, lmfao.
>>28412845Assuming aliens visiting us in the vast exanse of the universe is just as arrogant
Does anyone have the video of the UFO being illuminated by lightning in a thunderstorm
>>28406289fucking brilliant answer! this thread should just have ended here.
>>28406472goddamn, there are some real fucking retards on this rock....
>>28408375the proof lies on the side claiming real, you must prove. how fucking young and retarded are you, kid?
>>28406269We didn't have a camera and "it" was "illegal"
>>28408530hubble telescope has recorded particles that travel faster than light, and check out quantum physics for 'physics' that are crazier than we knew a decade ago. open a book, jewfuck!
>>28408630>The electric magnetic field that surrounds the shipquit spitting out bullshit and calling it 'facts', retard.
>>28408798shut the fuck up, jewtard
>>28411041these fucktards will never believe the truth.
>>28411084i remember this movie...it sucked
>>28411098and they are also fake, faggot
>>28411157how would a retard like yourself know what's in a fake ufo? give us a rundown on what those green tanks are, jewboy.
>>28406269Because UFO’s aren’t metal spacecraft built by living organisms that (somehow) traveled faster than light to observe the populations of Sarth.These odd balls of light and weird shapes pilots are seeing are the third dimensional projections of fourth dimensional beings. They’ve always been around, but before people started flying they were called “ghosts” or “spirits” or something similar. You’re less likely to see them on the ground simply because of obstructions. “Aliens” are just a rebranding of these same beings that existed in every culture throughout history; angels, demons, gods, spirit guides... it’s all the same thing. The idea that they’re beings from another planet is just the modern version. Calling them “aliens” is factually correct in that it’s an intelligence other than human that isn’t from our plane of existence. There’s more anecdotal evidence of a spiritual nature to aliens than to their existence as physical entities, though either relies solely on belief. But, if you want to see these beings, there’s no physical way to contact them while there is a spiritual way. People have never done the former (ever; it’s literally never been done), while the latter can be done via meditation, massive human sacrifice, or hallucinogens. Read about Terence McKenna’s so called “machine elves.” He’s an old school hippie who studied hallucinogens and basically brought DMT to the masses. Most of the people who experience these visits via DMT know the difference between a hallucination and something tangible, yet most proclaim these beings to be real.
>>28411190don't have the date? quality investigation.....and it is all bullshit, niggerfag
>>28411227this is the only believable story in this thread.
>>28411671you are so dumb you believe this crap.
>>28406269Because you don't know what to look for and are too self-important to change that fact.
>>28411704>I'm a ufo witnessno you're not
>>28412541your fagass believes this, too I'm sure
>>28413605i.e. con man. I actually remember this individual's unconvincing musings on the JFK assassination, people who say they're suspicious of people who view everything as a conspiracy should realize there's just as many people who view nothing as a conspiracy - no matter what the evidence is. They know their target audience, and what sells books.
>>28412845nigger, you thinking you're smart is quite the arrogant stance to take.
>>28406269Because they're probably are all fake>>28408280I think the claim that its a UFO in the first place is the one that needs to be backed up
>>28412871iphone 12 is actually not that good, optics wise. Galaxy 20's Ultras (note or normal), Galaxy 21 Ultra, and the Huawei flagships (pro plus with 10x periscope optical lens, similar as Galaxy 21 ultra), with their 5-10x lenses, are all better than the 0.5-3x zoom range of iPhone12 Pro Max.
>>28415209And here you are hanging around us. What does that say about you?
>>28406269I think the main problem is that most of the time people aren't looking for them. And even if you see them, I'd hazard guess most of them are in "low light", so in night etc. So what happens is before smartphone era, people had VHS camcorders (consumer grade), and I hate to break it to you guys but, those things aren't exactly meat for night photography. It's the same story with smartphones we have today.. Despite having newer technology for improved hardware of imaging and software of processing, they just barely manage to get equal or similar quality in night shooting than those larger sensor / older tech camcorders.. so there hasn't been any real improvement in low life photography for normal consumers.The ONLY people who COULD take a picture of these things, are photographers carrying some still DSLR or video SLR (those expensive canon C series video cameras), which actually have bigger sensors capable of capturing more light, which is VERY useful in low light photography, let alone VIDEO. So the big problem here is, most people don't really carry those kind of stuff all of the time, unless they're going on a "UFO hunt", conciously going to look for them. But most of the time, people don't indeed carry anything that COULD take a good still, or especially video (which is harder) in lowlight.The hunts do however happen, some people go out with the gear, yet still no convicng photos? For that I'm afraid I don't have the answer, I can only provide answer to the assumption that smartphones is enough to photograph these things in low light, which they quite frankly are not. You need better gear to take 20-30x (300-500mm or whatever) range photos in low light, and for that only DSLR can work.
>>28415458Why do you say that?
>>28406472On /x/ I never know if these posts are trolls or an actual mental retardation.But just in case - they just changed the sheet in the background for each video.
>>28406269Because it's faaaaaaaaake.[spoiler]and so is space[/spoiler]
>>28415433Get a load of this newfag shill.
>>28406269There is no excuse except that they must not exist. 20 years ago all these shaky fucked up low res. images and videos were to be expected. There is NO excuse today. Even the cheapest phone shoots in high def or even super high def and have rock solid image stabilization features. Also having incredible lens tech allowing excellent shooting even on crazy dark nights. A ufo outline should stand out as a deeper shade of black againt a dark evening sky minimum with this technology. Lacking in detail sure, but sharp outlines should be expected. Yet we have yet to see one decent piece yet even with these technologies of ufo image evidence. And its all still being produced in copious quantities nearly every single day. AND NOTHING!WE ARE UNIQUE AND THE ONLY SENTIENT LIFE FORM IN OUR GALAXY AND POSSIBLY THE UNIVERSE.
>>28406427Can someone explain all the goofy lights to me. What purpose could they serve. Why don't our space craft have all these decorative lights.
>>28408443this is the main reasoni have like $10000 worth of photography equipment and it's still difficult to take nice pictures of far away things at the best of timesESPECIALLY when they're moving and DOUBLE ESPECIALLY when you're not expecting to be photographing them
>>28406514This sun footage is the only hope I have of life outside earth. And I don't think this is sentient life. I think its some sort of deep space creature that we miraculously caught images of feeding. Something it probably only has to do every few centuries.
>>28411227nice anon, im happy for you
>>28416121our spacecraft don't have lights because they always land in the dayour air craft definitely have lights though
>>28411183Because you know, no one ever actually faces the subject they are looking at they just shift their eyes. Come on folks. This makes no sense. Human 3d vision works best when we face our subject. So whats going on here? EXACTLY, FAKE FUCKING CRAP!
>>28412537Notice that too huh? Looks like about 10 lb. test fishing line.
>>28416110Try filming a plane flying with a camera phone. Not as easy as you think
>>28415322A fun demo of faster than light speeds is flicking a flashlight across a wall. Now I've been told its just some sort of trick/illusion. But fact is the beam is moving faster than light speed it has to be. The math says it is.
>>28406269there are plenty if unknown light in the sky countsas far as why there are no contact/close up vids because the UFO/alien subject is a MASSIVE gaslight and they are glownagros in blimps
>>28416254Pretty sure I did NOT say aircraft. And so your telling me ufo SPACE craft land using visual flight reference. Really our lights are for the sake of safety since AIRCRAT do fly at night and can crash into one another. The lights are USELESS for landing. Again none of our space craft seem to have these elaborate lighting effects. Maybe if we add them, boooom, tech. breakthrough. Ridiculous sounding huh?
>>28408340No phone is good at tracking a tiny object against a featureless object, or at optical or digital zoom. It's not surprising at all, go try to take a good phone photo of a 737 flying at 30000 ft
>>28416414the answer is right in front of you but you can't see the forest for the trees
>>28408798105th Recon Squad / 382nd Bomb Group for 7 years on many grey floating things in the ocean here. You're a fucking moron.
>>28416435Yet most of these ufo are obviously not even near that high. In most photos were talking a few hundred to a very few thousand feet, and that changes EVERYTHING. Or at least it should because I have taken excellent photos of 737s flying at a couple thousand feet. The detail in super high def catches even the outlines of passengers in the windows. Probably even more if the lighting is just right.
I don't know why people who ask "is everything a conspiracy to you?" don't ask the inverse of that question to people like Mick West.Any time I hear "professional skeptic" I assume they're just trying to sell books to neckbeards.
>>28416487post one or at least tell me what setup you're using
>>28411098Windows different sizes and not straight. Second photo you can see the fishing line holding them up. And even if that wasnt true, why the fuck would a alien ship have lights and/or landing pads like that? Its a fucking antigravity machine and it has shitty legs to prop it up as it comes out of the water lol
>>28416523You have a $30,000 Leica setup with that sweet Leica zoomie and you are having trouble. Dude, get some lessons for God's sake. I shoot using a Samsung ultra with image stab. at full tilt definition. I ain't posting shit. Your the one making biz are statements about UFOs trekking at 30,000 feet. I doubt at that height any person could see a ufo at night. The lights would just be a blob. Why ufo have all these lights remains another mystery.
>>28416110The smartphones don't actually have that good lowlight capability, and their 23mm (65mm in some flagships) are not good enough, considering that these lenses are not 400-800mm range. As of today, there's only Huawei Mate/P40 Pro Plus and Samsung Galaxy Ultra 21, that can go 240mm, which still might be short for what equals "non-city bird" flying on the sky, and this is not taking into account that most of the UFOs are in "night time", whilst most of the birds flying are challenging even in day time (not taking their movement into account, just the fact they're that far away from you). So no, none of what you wrote made any sense. Try a DSLR with a 300mm prime lens or a 150-600mm zoom lens, and tell me the current phones are anywhere near to be able to take photos of flying birds. We can assume they're stationary if it's night time, and there might be some partial light luminance, but you're still mostly against "darkness", so that light source might not be enough, especially considering that even with a long lens, the phone sensor might not be big enough for those long focal lengths (since longer lenses tend usually be lower light gathering, for weight and cost saving reasons.. those 240mm lenses on flagships are f.4.5~ , whilst the shorter lenses are closer to f.1.8 .. so a 400mm+ would presumably be f/6.3-f/8 range , apertures that even the DSLR with 3-5 times the phone sensor will struggle with in low light, which is why most of night photography is DSLRs is made in f/1.4 - f/2.8 range typically.
>>28406269Because they're all fake
>>28416596Like I said. You are not going to get any detail. But the darker outline will stand out like a sore thumb against the night sky. You're right cell phone lenses are crap for night shooting and only just adequate for day light shooting but they are better than you are giving them credit for.
>>28416584>$30000 kekregardless you are dumb and i don't believe you>ya i totally take pictures of airplanes with my cellphone you can see the pilot's glasses and everything i just wont post it
>>28416498oddly enough the "skeptics" are never skeptical about media or government propaganda.
>>28416629Yeah, that was a low estimate. You got some special source for Leica gear or something. Even a little vacation Leica jobber runs more than a thousand dollars.
>>28416643>a thousand dollars keki don't shoot leica but i know enough about photography to know that you know nothing about photography and you should probably stop lying about it on the internet because it just makes you sound very retarded
>>28416666Oops, you put your shitty foot straight from your ass and into your mouth. Dumbass faggots should no to stay away from 4chan
>>28416660>he doesn't know that the lens is sold separately
>>28416673just post one airplane picture you faggot larper
>>28416660And thats a cheapo depot Leica frens.
>>28408340t. I have no idea how cameras work
>>28406269theories on this?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sn2BWl7mHsY
>>28408798460 OSS, USSF. You are in fact retarded. Yes there are countries we share data with, but no, not every single country’s military is working together, I can assure you of that.
I truly would like to believe but even with today's tech. and advancements the evidence BLOWS! I'll keep looking hoping for that evidence that literally makes me shit and piss myself.
>>28416660That’s just the base camera you fucking retard, lenses in general run much more expensively than the base camera
>>28416781Yep sure do. And I'll say again thats a $30,000 Leica setup, and thats discount pricing.
>>28416807holy shit you're dumb i bet people laugh right in your face a lot
>>28406593That's clearly swamp gas
>>28416823And these are just baby Leica lenses. Were barely entering professional class Leica equipment. I doubt anyone even has the particular Leica Zoomie in stock. Their like Lamborghinis, only a few are made only the lucky drive one.
>>28416823$20,000 for a entry level Leica Mclass and entry level zoomie. KEK stop while you still have your pride.
>>28416901>>28416911what are you doing?
>>28416923Replying to myself. Ooopsie, fixed it.
>>28416852these aren't even """"zoomies""""
>>28416954No shit district, I call all zoom lenses zoomies, habit. You know, something should be sticking out to you pretty well by now. Go at with your $1000 worth of toy camera equipment and don't piss in yards you know nothing about.
>>28416977they're not zooms either
>>28416987You are a ignorant ass. Your pilpul ends here. I'm out!
>>28416996don't hit your big brain on the door on your way out
>>28415290nonono my little stupid, see the burden of proof lies upon the accuser. So in this case it would fall in the lap of the person accusing this of being fake. It's ok, maybe you can convince another thread of your pseudo intellect.
>>28416852These are what photo peepol call "prime lenses", and if you choose other brand, you can get these lenses (with similar light gathering capabilities) for much cheaper.>>28416584>>28416487This sounds like bullshit.
>>28415476HOLY FUCK IS THAT REAL???
>>28408244why is no one talking about the only verifiable thing in the thread?
>>28417860It's verifiably a hoax.
>>28417931then verify it pussy. Post some links
>>28417939>do my homeworkNo, I prefer to leave you ignorant believing stuff that isn't real.
>>28417989you wanna try again anon but this time be more believable?
>>28418003I am never going to post links for you.Do your own homework or stay ignorant.
Suprised none of you have bought up the phobos incident
>>28418048What is that supposed to be?
>>28418014there you go, I almost believed that one. With practice your shitposting will reach new heights. Seriously though, if you're trying to deter others from looking at this then all you're doing now is generating curiosity. Thanks for the thread bump I guess?
>>28418111That's the best part of the trolls / shills, they basically ensure continual bumps for as long as you play with them. >>28417989Cringe
>>28418198UFO NUTS DEBOOOOOOONKED!
>>28418215>That's the best part of the trolls / shills, they basically ensure continual bumps for as long as you play with them.I literally made the thread, retard.
>>28418236lol and of course you put Mick WestCringe. Oswald acted alone right buddy
>>28418253Mick West is great, debooooonks /x/tards on a daily basis.>Oswald acted alone right buddyStrawman. Nobody believes this, not even the "official" story claims he acted alone.
>>28418265Professional debunker = shill or con manBelieving nothing is a conspiracy is the same as believing everything is. It's retarded.
>Strawman. Nobody believes this, not even the "official" story claims he acted alone.News to me. What are you on about?I doubt he acted at all, far as the shooting goes.
>>28418198that's not even the same incident lol. Why are you like this anon?
>>28418275>Professional debunker = shill or con manMore like he just wants less ignorant/dumb people around believing dumb things like chemtrails and Qanon.
>>28406269because taking a video from miles away and on the ground would make any flying vehicle look like a blurry splotch of neckbeard jizz on camera
>>28411003sky divers from a redbull ad
>>28418285I mean to reply to this guy>>28413601
Best I've seen.
>>28412615bitchute has great examples from south america and new swabia
>>28408340>what do you mean my cell phone camera intended for selfies can't clearly record a light thousands of feet away in the sky at night time?
>>28416753I hate having to say this but... does that look like a big black cock to anyone else?
>>28412318I think that's possible, but is pic related a reflection? It's at the very beginning of the video. It looks the eve of a building. I guess it could be cgi or just a natural phenomenon. I'm not ruling out anything just yet. It's quite interesting.
>>28406626if he needs an engineer, he can just rent one
>>28408305That is not what happened.
>>28406269Try to taking a picture of something we're very familiar with using your phone. Pick out a bird, or a jet etc. You probably will not be able to identify whatever it is you're taking a picture of. Most cameras just do not have the zoom capabilities. Now, if one comes to my door and I take a selfie with him, that's another story. But, even then, we still wouldn't believe it. We would pass it off as something else.
>>28420694Bill Clinton and John Podesta tried to get info on UFOs, but couldn't get anything.
I just want it to be June already fuck.Come the fuck ooonnn kill the tension already. Either high res shit or physical evidence or some shit. I'm like 70% sure the 'disclosure' is just going to be "We don't know what those things are lmao"
>>28406269Because they don’t fucking exist, you goddamn fuck nugget.
>>28420757James Woolsey, John Brennan, and John Ratcliffe have all said this year UFOs are real. Ratcliffe claims the US has satellite photographs UFOs and that he can talk about about it when the report is out. But it won't be out in June, the government is slow.
>>28418048A big stick next to an asteroid
>>28416110>Even the cheapest phone shoots in high def or even super high def and have rock solid image stabilization features. >Also having incredible lens tech allowing excellent shooting even on crazy dark nightst. sensorlet who has no idea hwat he's talking about
>>28418462Thanks for the infoI had a playlist worsth sharing at one point but a few months ago i checked on it and more than half of its content is deleted (the good videos of course)>>28406269Here some that i still have https://youtu.be/HvfkZE5W2echttps://youtu.be/agIsU7prteEhttps://youtu.be/q4TzscEFB1I
>>28408409False ideology...we wouldnt be allowed that tech if it existed, too dangerous for the average person even on a none religious perspective... Either way it does exist and >>28408364 is pretty spot on
>>28409024This is completely ignored....shows where this thread is psychologically
>>28416359>t. Someone that doesn't know mathI used to use a similar example as a teen thinking i outsmarted physics thinking "if it takes 8 minutes for sunlight to reach earth, if i had a poll that stretched all the way to the sun, and pushed it forward, that energy is moving fater than the light"Its a fundamental mistake, if the light was moving faster than the speed of light it wouldn't be visible...and your eye cant be used as a tool of measurement in this because of the sheer speeds being talked about compared to how many frames per second our eyes processes this light
>>28415923>1967Thats pretty old
>>28416447Thanks for providing an explaination numbnuts...
>>28416584>>28416487This is complete lie and thats why you're willing to take screenshots for proof but wont post a single photo like you described Not only would the movement and atmospheric blur make it impossible to see outlines of people in the plane, theres no way to track a damn plain for a clear photo like that...thats another reason why your lies are obvious, you're acting like people spend the majority of their money on the damn lense when the real money is put into the TRACKING SYSTEMS used to take perfect stills of objectsPlease just say its bait and save yourself from being even more embarrassed
>>28406269https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqpAsmQnoZY&ab_channel=7NEWSSpotlightThere's plenty. you just havnt had access to them for the most part
>>28422113Yup, either you're swarmed with shills or totally ignored. Not much constructive discussion.
>>28409024/threadThe very idea of professional debunkers is cringe. If they're not being paid by the gov. then they're basically simping for it.
It is the night
My bodies weak
I'm on the run
No time to sleep
>>28423043I've got to ride
>>28418458To this day the most compelling video by far.
>>28423144That may be a legitimate satelite anon lol
>>28406269depends on what you wanna call good. Nowadays there's fuckload more videos due to phone cameras, but contrarily to what retards believe, most phone cameras are NOT suited to film something in the distance. it will never have the real quality you seek
>>28423285Just suspended in the middle of the sky? Okay.https://youtu.be/nXiKaxEgSvo
Remember that guy that summoned a UFO on tv? was that ever explained?
>>28411988they are shy
>>28423531I laughed, but I hope that cat wasn't alive
I had an encounter with a group of friends once, will include only the relevant details. Am I crazy, or was this legit?>walk to old iron bridge near Sach's Bridge, Gettysburg PA>smoke blunt, walking back>beam of bluish light comes from the sky, creating approx. 15 ft. circle centered on us>incredibly bright, like helicopter spotlight>washes color out of everyone, strong shadows>no sound, clear calm night>look at eachother>look at light source above us>look at eachother>run like hell about 3/4 mile back to the car>no one speaks during 30 minute car ride homeHaven't told many people. the memory makes my hair stand up years later.
>>28423144>>28423335finally some good fucking picturesstop talking faggots and post more footage and photos
>>28423977I will when you do
>>28424065fine heres a real picture of an alien
>>28424088I also have an alien
>>28418056Shadow of itself
>>28423335That's a balloon dude
>>28408364Don't you think there are beings living under earth, in those crevices/caves? Isn't that how the Russian submarine sank, because it got too close to their base?
>>28415440the "dimension" meme is getting real tiring if you ask me.creatures from any of the infinite planets in this universe just like our own actually makes total sense."dimensions" is a kind of neat thought experiment the first time you hear about it. but thats all it is. it's not a thing that exists in real life except for a mathematical idea.
>>28422246they have lights for the same reason aircraft have lights..to be seen
>>28425318So the 'aliens' are are earth? Like captain Nemo or something? Or is it Atlantis?
>>28424285Best footage I have ever seen.But it could be cgi
>>28424285best thing about this one is that its oc by an anon that posts here
>>28406611are they this fucking stupid? it's fucking main stream for stupid fucking fringe tier memes or culture to be a norm now. why are they trying to be cool and appeal to some group of boomers? is it because boomers actually have money and can invest in causes? jfc i hope the tik tokking niggers don't higjack our future
>>28406269Ufos are either plasma balls or secret government technology
>>28423909i want to believe
>>28425318>to be seenYeah so why not pull up to time square amd say hi again?
>>28411220not a bad video i guess but design is kinda gay
>>28433408woah, what the fuck is that?
>>28433408There's no way that could be fake
>>28433408That's not real. Are you serious?
>>28406269My mom, uncle, and grandparents all saw a UFO in the late-1980s hovering about their farmhouse. When they snapped a Polaroid of it, it immediately flew away extremely fast, and the pic came out solid black. Not sure if it was a camera malfunction or if the ayys have some tech that fucks with it.
Holloman Air Force Base UFO landinghttps://youtu.be/BT3NoIqobxQ@1:18:18https://youtu.be/wCsO8dPpW0k
>>28433418>>28433430>>28433444clearly whatever this was to close to the truth, whatever it was
So much fake shit ITT, this whole thread is a false flag
>>28406269They are really high and can easily avoid any of our planes. Any footage is on purpose. Slow reveal
heres a fewhttps://youtu.be/NYqV3nV6FNshttps://youtu.be/gf-2pwKYscg?t=147https://youtu.be/X2IfrrWMfbkhttps://youtu.be/pInz5O1_BrQ?t=42https://youtu.be/yZnXNqcNfXo?t=404https://youtu.be/mlDo-2pKTBg?t=17https://youtu.be/79E65f5rUs8https://youtu.be/7OAVD7Q-feA?t=154https://youtu.be/BD4E5FD7_HMhttps://youtu.be/l_Lzb8fdJaAhttps://youtu.be/060LLfJlIe4
>>28422989>>28423035>>28423043>>28423144Ride like the wind
to be free again
i've seen many UFOs. just orbs. balls of light.unfortunately never any up close distinct shapesit's all i ever think about th0ugh
i'm alone ITT then? as usual.
is there anybody out there?
>>28433418>>28433430>>28433444What the hell was it?????¿
>>28408244This one is pretty convincing considering the multiple shots of it.