>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Y1zhLnZyO4Looks like we're getting a sequel.Hopes? Dreams? Tired of WWII?
>>848317All they need to do is give the multiplayer games some more options and this can be huge. Also glad they're sticking with WW2 instead of forcing themselves to change to a different time period.
Looks like the same reskinned motherfucker
>>848317>said they wanted to change things from the usual D-Day or Stalingrad missionsOh that's neat, I wonder what they'll do>its still americans and soviets vs germans
Anyone here remember when AS2 released and it was basically just the same as AS1? There was outrage when it was just released.
>>848317God raptor is such annoying fake faggot.
>>848337It still is the same game. Men of war is the cod of RTT.
>fundamental problems simply ignored>turning more and more into war thunderi will forever seethe about the wasted potential of men of war
>>848374You inferred all that from a trailer? Did you have Rick & Morty running on your second monitor?
>>848545its actually a gameplay trailer and notice the massive emphasis on tanks
>>848317What dreams? Isn't this just gonna be a reskin to try and milk their 'new' customers? Do these guys do anything else but reskin the same game over and over?
>>848317>they tried to make a fucking MMO and failed and now they're turning it into MoW 2
>>848366I'm being unironic for comedic effect here, but that's legitimately really unfair to cod.
>>849500Really makes you think, doesn't it?
>>848317Lol there still milking the same engine what a joke. Who in their right mind would buy this?
>>848317I can't spot the difference between this and mowas2
>>848333If I open multiplayer and it's once more exactly the same game as mowas, it's an instant uninstall and/or refund
Cant wait to buy the same game again for the 5th time!
>>848317Looks like they're using the new engine they wrote for Call to Arms. I hope they fix the god awful damage model.
>>848337No, I remember AS1 being dogshit and AS2 being actually good
>>848545>>848723Your comparison to War Thunder is spot-on here, since MOW2 is F2P. They turned that game into a grind-simulator for mouth breathing retards.
>>848317Does it even have a campaign anymore? I remember the very first games in the series had campaigns and the gameplay was much more tactical. Very fond memories of the Wittman campaign. Or am I confusing it with some other game?
>>848317>The Classic RTS series returnsIt never fucking went away, there are fewer Heroes of Might and Magic games than Men of War games.>Only shows Germans vs SovietsIf they don't also add in the Japs, Burgers, Bongs, or a new country, why would I buy this when I already have Gates? And Gates have also said that they want to add the west front.>Still WWII, no new setting, theatre, or theme, no Men of Spellwars or Men of the civilwar.>No new mechanics announced>Probably have Bestway's control scheme instead of the DMS one I have gotten used to.>Most likely the retarded MMO retooled into a SP/MP game.No thanks, you have to do better than that 1C/Bestway.
>>848317So faces of war no. 5, 6? What is it with Russians/warsawpacters and their inability to innovate? Same game, higher system requirements, still looks like a game from 2010.
>>850677Soldiers Heroes of WWIIFacesMen ofCondemnedRed TideVietnamAss-squadAss-squad 2Battle of EmpiresCall to ArmsAss-Squad 2 Cold WarGates of HellMen of 2We're at Faces of War 11 and Soldiers 12, unless I forgot a game, or you count cancelled projects like the Georgian War one/MMO of War 2, or don't count Gates of Hell.
>>850686Painful really. And the singleplayer/campaign gets worse to nonexistant with every installment. Just shitty sandbox multiplayer clusterfucks with too many units in too little ground for any meaningful tactics or strategy.
>>848317Looks like AS2.5, which was just AS1.5, which was just MoW1.5, which was just FoW1.5.VFX and SFX, as well as general art direction, just seem very inferior to Gates of Hell. If GoH keeps adding content, by the time MoW2 will be out I don't see why I'd go for that over GoH.