Thoughts on this? Is it worth checking out
No singleplayer? Pass actually
>no singleplayer AI whatsoeverlol
>>1045258I like the multiplayer and how it's a new RTS game that actually tries to innovate. It's in a fun state at the moment, at least based on the games I played back during the pre-release period, but it doesn't feel fleshed out enough to be a full release. They haven't labelled it 'early access' but if you look at their timeline it's clear there's lots of features that aren't implemented.The lack of a singleplayer mode is probably going to kill the game, and that's very sad.
>>1045258shill budget appropriated i see.
>>1045258The fact the game will likely never have skirmish AI is going to 100% kill the game in its crib. It'll never have a community outside of a small die hard subset.
can't get over the mobile game graphics desu
>>1045258Interesting game, a shame you can't play skirmish or that they have a couple of playable tutorials, especially because they have such a unique rts system. Also, the maps seem kind of small. I like that they've made sensible shortcut keys for everything that really helps. If your new it's difficult to see where you can place cities, ports, industry etc. Would have loved a quick menu ala BFME to build those. Tried one match multi so far and it plays well, pausing your production to build buildings is tricky but can work really well if you time it right. So far really impressed with this unique take on RTS especially for 12€
when people complain about not being able to turtle for 40 minutes vs ai...how are you too scared too play online, probably against people just a shit as you as well lol. scared of a game, dude actually scared of a game LMAO. like nooo I have ranked anxiety, nooo. Grow up loser
no campaign? guess mental omega will remain on the top then.
this is the ultimate game for people that complain about gookclicking and remembering build orders. WHERE ARE THEY, go play this fucking game you gookclick complaing cowards, or are you just pussy campaign only people that turtle against campagin missions for 40 minutes
bruh this nigga really never played mental omega campaign on anything but casual, he thinks you can just turtle them lmaooo
Are other people feeling like they slowed down the game? Everything seems to happen a lot slower in the release version than I recall.
>>1046327Found the gookclicker
>>1046327Strategy games aren't like those MMOs where you can join a match with no prior experience, learn as you go, and win without knowing what exactly you're doing. And even the most basic bitch shooters have some sort of bot match/shooting range mode where you can test out what works for you. Especially since this game bends over backwards to ditch the standard RTS direct control scheme, replacing it with this railroad tycoon noodle soup.
>>1046570this game is litreally anti gookclick, are you retarded? go be scared of playing a game more
>>1045258game is pretty based, fuck gook clickerslack of singleplayer is annoying but may come next yearin the meantime so being a loser and find some friends to play with nerd>>1045668you think these devs can afford shills??? lmaoPOST SEEDS
>>1045258I liked the demo. Bought it today to support it. Won a game. Lost a game. I like how games generally flow and the dynamics between the units. If my internet weren't being unstable I'd be playing it again right now.>>1045598It does feel pretty much like the demo still but I don't mind. I like the state it's in so any more is a bonus.>>1046327>>1046343Found the sex-havers. Listen to these self-assured alpha-males go. This is how cool people act. Take notes NERDS.
>>1049908I had a good fight on this one a couple nights ago. The enemy took the west while I took the east. I thought I'd have a resource advantage but my cities were too exposed and close to the front so he was able to raid them. It ended up a lot more even than I was expecting and I think if I replayed it I'd need to make securing the land bridge a much higher priority.Have you played on the seeds you posted? I'd be more interested in hearing how the fights went than just pure maps, since often things go a way that was not at all what you expected from looking at start.>>1049917I'm assuming the intention is a fight where each player controls one island but it looks a bit imbalanced for that. The west island has a substantial resource advantage (and safer, inland, cities) so both players are likely to start there and get into a knife fight near the city cluster to the west.>>1049918>full landActually pretty cool.>>1049929This one looks fun too. Lots of reasonable-looking starting positions and contesting the inland lake would have reasonable value since it lets you raid some major economic points.
>>1050314Also found this one while browsing some random seeds. It's not the most water-heavy map in terms of pure coverage amount, but the land being so split up is probably going to make naval operations a focus for both sides. Lots of opportunity for raids and sneaky business.>>1050307>I like the state it's in so any more is a bonus.My worry is that it won't sustain a playerbase. Without that it doesn't really matter if it remains in the current state because you can't play it unless you find some friends to drag into it with you.
>>1050324A bleak thought. I guess it's kind of rolling the dice on whether or not it catches on. Still I'm happy to support the experiment and get a bit of fun out of this. I've spent money on worse.
>>1050354Yeah, I'm also fine with spending money on innovative experiments. Novelty is too rare in game nowadays to turn them down for something like this. I'm just disappointed, really.Making an AI which can play like a human opponent obviously is a major effort, but an asymmetric experience is much simpler and can get away with really braindead AI with good level design. I think something like that would have immensely improved the appeal/longevity of the game.But hopefully I'm just overly pessimistic and at least a decent core of players stick around.
>>1050362Even a shit AI would have been a good demo tool and training wheel function. But on the other hand I enjoy trial by firing myself against other new players. This game doesn't really lend itself to getting stomped if you both the very base basics. If you can make infantry move towards where his guys are coming from you'll at least hold on a bit and have time to make decisions.
The only kind of PvE I would see from this game in the mid-term would be scripted missions.
Played a bit more today. I really like the territory selection starting system, but I seem to have won several times in a row due to people realising they'd chosen badly and resigning after our infantry meet because they realised I can probably claim 2/3 of the map from where I am. I guess recognising what's valuable is a skill, but it doesn't quite feel like a win when this happens. Stop choosing the corners and then quitting when you realise you're cornered. Corners are shit. Take bottlenecks you can lock down with loads of value to claim behind you.
>>1045258I've played a couple of games now. It is quite fun, but still a bit clunky and unintuitive in some moving aspects. I.e. how to get commando on the plane to make a drop (I've eventually found out).And my normal games/RTS reflexes make me constantly spawn commands while trying to click on the units. Also there is a problem when you want to ungroup and move few soldiers to conquer many territories at once when they are already in one group.Hopefully it will not die quickly and they will implement more content and tweak it here an there.
>>1046329wtf would a campaign for this kind of game even be?
>>1046327Your game will be dead in a month when all it will have will be like 5 no-life autists fanatically clinging to the game and scaring away any new players by tryharding, then the dev will go bankrupt once he sees the game is making him little to no income (assuming he won't use his 2 braincells to add a singleplayer mode so that the game will have life beyond singleplayer)Dawn of War released like 2 decades ago and I can still play it and enjoy it. Why? Offline singleplayer.
>Complain about gookclickers and esports ruining RTS>Some guy actually puts the time into designing and developing a non-gookclick rts>/vst/ won't play it because it doesn't have a mode where they can stomp ai or listen to a bedtime storyWhat's the point of making such a game if nobody will play it. If you only wanted to play sp all this time why even complain about gookclicking when it had no effect on you? You can already avoid it in all the RTS campaigns ever made
>>1051434No, /vst/ won't play it because they are not given a chance to at least practice against bots before they're thrown to play against sweaty tryhard neckbeards, and because the game will essentially become unplayable once the playerbase of only like 200 people loses interest and moves on.
>>1051437No matter how much you practice against bots you are going to get wrecked by people who spent that time playing pvp instead.
This game is going to die with or without an AI modeThen /vst/ is going to go back to complaining about esports and gookclicking while turtling in a corner against medium ai for an hourNothing ever happens
I just had a really entertaining game that revolved around islands. I enjoy that the pace of these games creates an executive command feeling while still creating exciting ground level situations. >>1051347Something I've been wondering is whether more infantry capture territories quicker. Not being certain makes me anxious when watching long conga lines capture one territory at a time. >>1051434That /vst/ guy is a real jerk!>>1051437>sweaty tryhard neckbeardsI've been watching replays of a few of my games. Everyone seems as tentative and uncertain as me.
Where do you guys prefer to put production facilities? Near the frontline for faster reinforcements, or far from it so they aren't in danger?>>1051176I think choosing a corner isn't as bad as it seems. Picking a more central position lets you expand in more directions but you won't know which way the enemy will be coming from and your forces will be spread around. A concentrated early attack from the player who started with a 'safe' direction can break through before you can divert forces towards them.For example, I've attached the map for a game I had today. I started around point A and northwards across the chokepoint, while my enemy started a few provinces south, taking the cities. As soon as I saw my enemy I set up a defensive line at A but with a lot of my forces northward it was breached because he just had more units than me. I had to set up a secondary defensive line at B, which I barely managed to hold since my aircraft came online and he had no AA. If his attack had included some AA I think he could have just rolled over me. After that he kept trying to push through B but at that point I had enough production to keep that area reinforced and more open space behind me to improve my economy with.I think his early play was very good, I lost a lot more troop value than he did and nearly outright lost, and he just needed to transition away from slamming into my second defensive line earlier. Even with the chokepoint, starting in the center felt very precarious.There was plenty of room for him to use transport boats to get some troops around the chokepoint, which would have opened up new wide open areas to fight over. In most situations where I've seen someone get trapped in the corner, they're just over-focusing on one well-defended area rather than actually trapped.>>1051474I'm fairly sure more troops capture faster than less. Single infantry seem to capture super slow while big hordes are fast.
This game sucks ass, do NOT —I repeat. do NOT— buy it.
This game is based, consider buying it.I recommend watching a game first.
>>1054095One of the two creators is streaming himself playing the game right now:https://www.twitch.tv/imphenzia
>>1054691Never seen a game at this high a level before. This is really cool. I like how even when top players start right next to each other the game runs at a coherent executive pace. And there's a lot of tactical room within these limited identical rosters. These commando moves are stuff I'd never have tried.
Literally a gookclick
>create a standard gookclick RTS>Focus your PR on how much non gookclick the game is>Both microfags and macroshittet play your gameDevs are based
>>1055247>>1054975>gookclicksubstantiate your claims
>>1055247>>1054975You have to be quite retarded to call it gookclick.The game is FootmenWars or if you are old enough (which I doubt) "Z" kind of game, or mushroom wars if any of these sounds familiar.But the twist is that you do not attack a territory/base but draw, a line and you have to build your producing facilities yourself.The rest is just that - whoever captures more territiories, especially with capital production - wins.At the beginning I thought this game is something new and innovative, but it really is quite brain dead game of sending swarms of your units at enemy with a little twists and tweaks.
>>1055985So what? Nothing should exist that resembles anything else that has ever existed?
>>1055985I'd decimate you 1v1.
>>1055985>But the twist is that you do not attack a territory/base but draw, a line and you have to build your producing facilities yourself.So it's lik Hearts of Iron 4 with better construction?
>>1056106it was response to calling it gooclick. hard to grasp whole conversation that goes 1 post per 6 hours?
>>1056357I follow you. Your tone seems to be suggesting that because the game is like footman wars with some twists it's not worth it.
>>1055985>You have to be quite retarded to call it gookclick.>The game is "peak gookclick" or if you are old enough (which I doubt) "standard gookclick" kind of game, or "mobile game bullshit" if any of these sounds familiar
Can someone fill me in on what you mean with "gookclick"?
>>1056556practical execution having primacy over conceptual mechanics - doing the wrong thing well beats doing the correct thing poorlyit is, of course, a sliding scale, but is usually argued for/against as if it's a binary.
>>1056569that was way more interesting than what i expected from a word consisting of sticking "gook" and "click" together.gookclick seems to be used as an insult but i don't see how it's a bad thing being able to win by using non-standard methods but executing them well
>>1056583there is nothing "non-standard" about a tank rush
>>1056583It's used as an insult by people who are slow and have no recourse except to lose when confronted by a human with better reflex. For such people it is very frustrating to see an opponent make "obvious" mistakes or rely on "bad" units but still win regardless. In their butthurt they perceive a difference between mechanical skill and strategic ability that all real time strategy computer games combine into a single activity.
>>1056590that's a wrong thing? i guess "doing the wrong thing well beats doing the correct thing poorly" is meaningless if people argue that stuff like a tank rush is "wrong"
>>1056596It's usually just a cope, yeah.
>>1056556Are gook friendly games, meaning games where you dont need to think but only to move your finger fast enoughClick is meant to represent the RTS version of this (meaning games like sc) in contrast to tactical games like command ops etc)Other gook friendly games are tekken, lol (compared to the tactical games like street figter and dota)
>>1056596take sc2, and tell a great player "you can only build roaches". he'll absolutely crush an average player who is not just unrestricted, but even has a heads up that "this guy only builds roaches"
>>1056583>bad thing being able to win by using non-standard methods but executing them wellIn a strategy game? Because it moves the focus away from strategy and towards manual dexterity. For an extreme example of non-standard methods executed well, see the following video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKVFZ28ybQsThe same stupid plan has a completely different result when every unit acts perfectly.
Game looks pretty cool. But there's zero fucking shot that I'm forking over $30 for a game with 100 active players. If they made it F2P with purchasable cosmetics I think it would've been fine. Hell, even $5 and I would've impulse purchased it. But $30 on a game that may not even have players in a months time, and zero singleplayer to speak of is an absolute joke.
>>1056556It means "i'm too retarded to play with other players, especially chinese who do nothing with their lives but play the single game 24/7">>1056637Well LineWar isn't about fast clicking or doing any fast microing so it cannot be a gookclick by definition.>>1056510Not a single mentioned game is a game that needs dexterity or planning build orders or other. Calling RTS games gookclick because they are real time really shows your retardation (which is funny because retarded also means being slow)
>>1055985>>1056728Isnt Footmen wars a sc/wc mod? Maybe I am wrong tho
>>1056556Gookclick is a name and behavior. It means the poster is either a well known troll who posts "gookclick" a lot and complains incessantly about being bad at RTS multiplayer.-"Gook" for Starcraft-"Click" because he thinks the reason he loses games is because of low APM.No actual RTS player actually uses the term, except in a perjorative manner to refer to said poster and his behavior.
>>1056760Line War doesn't seem to require high actions per minute at all, especially compared to Starcraft or Age of Empires, so guess the people calling it a gookclick are just trolling.
>>1056873higer APM are the king in LineWar, people are just bad rn
Still more gookclick than supreme commander on top of being uglier and priced much higher somehowThe king keeps his throne
>>1056905well... i mean sure, but "higher apm" in line war is like 10% of what a "high apm" in star craft is. a higher apm will be king in any game unless it's turn based. someone with 2 apm will typically beat the guy that have 1 apm since it takes him twice as long to figure out what to do in the game.
>>1056932I think you are understimating how important fast clicks can become in this gameBut desu the game was doa, so the meta wont ever be settled
>>1056981>dead on arrivalhttps://steamcharts.com/app/1309610i dunno, the game is by 2 guys, they had no publisher and the RTS genre isn't exactly popular + it isn't a traditional RTS so it turns away RTS players expecting it to have your typical RTS gameplay.as long as people can find a match i wouldn't consider the game neither a failure nor dead
>>1056981>doaThis mindset that every game has to become a seasonal constantly maintained live-service that runs for at least 25 years is destroying video games. When did players internalise the values of Electronic Arts?
Gookclicker players are seething
>>1057364It doesn't have to be maintained for 25 years. But having enough players to find a match months after its launch would be a good start.
>>1057500can you connect directly to an IP? multiplayer-focused games that rely on centralized servers that eventually will go down makes me sad
I was really interested in this and almost bought it when I realized it's only 1vs1 at the moment... I'll wait until they add at least 2vs2 or FFA if the game isn't dead then.Releasing fully in this state is, imho, a big mistake.
>>1058013i think it's very important to not split the pool of players, this game is not big enough to support match making in both 1vs1 and 2vs2 with both reasonable queue times 24/7 and reasonable skill-match.they could probably have spent a couple of months of implementing 2vs2 to gain 5% more players but then end up killing the game much faster due to long queue times and poor skill-matching. once the game enters that spiral it's doomed, so they made the right choice in recognizing they just don't have enough players to support more than 1 mode.
Gaem is kool. It's better than Age of Shit and Gookcraft.
>>1051386Like other RTS campaing retard
Why do you think this game isnt a "gookclik"?
>>1058195https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmYhX8fjmo8doesnt have this
As an RTS, Line War is fine. I think the developer is introducing innovation to the genre with their orders system, but ultimately, it feels very clunky. The controls are unintuitive and the UI feels like it's fighting against me. What it does do right is it makes management of forces and the reinforcement of forces simpler so you can focus on your economy. The problem is is that there's already a much better game from over ten years ago that did all of this better. I'd recommend you just buy Supreme Commander Forged Alliance instead.
>>1051410what's fun in offline singleplayer unless it's some sort of sandbox, rpg or rng-heavy experience?
>>1051437playing against bots is never equal to playing against real people. you can very easily learn to exploit the ai and human players are technically unpredictable.
>>1056556It doesn't mean anything, whoever uses the term just doesn't want to admit that they're bad.
>>1056643And what's the point? A great player is great because of the execution. Strategy is ALSO about execution and it has to be both swift and precise. Whoever denies it is either fanboying some historical army that lost in the end or just doesn't want to admit that there are people who simply ARE better than him.
>>1056583The problem with gookclick is that is reduces the strategy part of the game in favor of micromanagement. You spend less time making decisions and reacting to your opponent's decisions with more decisions, and more time babysitting your units and reacting to your opponent's micromanagement with more micromanagement. Faggots who lose due to having low APM and no awareness should get fucked, but if an RTS can maintain the same density of decision-making for less clicks, it's a straight up better RTS. Arguing against that is like saying that having no mass select and orders and instead being forced to select-right click every single unit like in Dune 2 makes for a great game.
>>1058209To me Line War feels like Supreme Commander refined down to an Advance Wars like level of simplicity. Everything is clear, readable, and works very satisfyingly on such a basic level. I actually hope they don't add much more complexity. And the UI and controls are a bit odd but after a few hurdle moments I don't feel bothered now.
>>1058211wouldn't even be possible from what ive seen of line war
>>1056556Because it's still a real-time game so your reaction time is going to provide a key advantage regardless of what the dev claims. Microlets will keep losing and keep bitching unless they realize that RTSes are effectively action games and therefore require a certain degree of physical aptitude to play well.
>>1058791by that logic every strategy game that isn't turn based is a gookclicker.
>>1059021command ops and scourge arentand they are the only strategical rts eversc2 is an action game, I love those kind of games so isnt bad for me, but I would rather play random FG on fightcade than play copypasted space vs pg13 tyranids vs chinese gacha game characters
>>1059021>by that logic every strategy game that isn't turn based is a gookclicker.I mean, if you're a major slowpoke (no pun intended), you might as well treat that as an actual definition. These folks are bad at keeping up with randoms and need to realize they should quit or get gud or find likeminded fellows who will humor their code of honor.
i'm not feeling so good guys, halp
>>1060318I'm posting in the threads and playing the game. My part is done. Now finish aircraft carriers.
>>1060318The game is pushing a different approach and overcomplicates the simplest RTS control schemes. And it does so without much advertisement, in early access, and no AI to practice against. It was going to be a hit or miss even among the few who were looking forward to it in the first place.It'll take something truly unexpected for it to flourish. Something like, I don't know, Nenechi picking it up and unintentionally turning it into a fotm.
>>1061297>hello guys, this is pewdiepie, and i thought we'd check out line war today. looks like a great game.>999999 all-time peak
>>1061297Once you have more than 50 units and know what you're doing it becomes the simplest rts control scheme ever. Trying to control a developed game of Line War with Age of Empires style individual unit control would be sickening. I used to play Empire Earth. Stuff like airports, combined arms warfare, artillery, all of it felt like shit compared to this.
>>1045258>indie mp focused RTSThey never learn
I racked up a ten game winning streak and a 30-10 record. Now I feel done, at least for now. I owe it to myself as an aesthete to not become endlessly committed to one game. I got my money's worth and wish this game the best.
>>1064209if you wish it the best you'd help out with expanding the match making queue ;_;