>Company of Heroes 2, huh? More like Company of Kino 2 if you ask me.
I didn't ask, THOUGH.
stfu. It isn't that good.
>>1020813it is though
>Yes, I do play Company of Heroes 2
>>1020805based coh 2 poster
I once called it "company of zeroes" because I didn't enjoy it, and my friend sperged out for a solid twenty minutes.
microtransactions, premium/p2w commanders, loot dropseverything i wanted in my CoH sequel
>>1020805its the best RTS there is fuck the fantasy faggots who say otherwise its pretty well balanced ATM axis might be a little OP
>>1020805What's wrong with the game? I never played it but I know based on basic pattern recognition that any time someone memes a game with the reddit bodybuilder man it's always an utterly garbage game with absolutely no redeeming qualities whatsoever.
>>1020813It is, cope
>>1020990>I cant winnnnnnjust use the stock commander
>>1021955The only issue is that some commanders have far better abilities than others. That's not even a problem at high level play as nearly any commander is viable if you can use all your core units effectively. Game's fun, always intense and exciting. >T. 995 hours played, 90% of that MP
>>1020813just play Spearhead II, bro
>>10219551. At least 80% of RTS players only touch singleplayer. COH1 has a more fun campaign (COH2 is all about the misery of Stalinism and its related Hollywood stereotypes) and COH2 Skirmish matches are much more balanced for multiplayer whereas the first game felt like more of a spectacle.2. Very limited mod support, fairly sure it's impossible to create new models, only kitbash from existing ones. Again, COH1 had big and popular overhauls.3. When playing, you pick a commander that gives you unique units or abilities. Some are free, but most have to be purchased - either with microtransactions or an ingame currency you grind by playing. In COH1 you picked one of three doctrines, for free.TL;DR: If you're a compstomper and/or like big overhauls, COH1 is great and COH2 sucks. If you like multiplayer, COH2 is good and has a healthy playerbase as well.
Simultaneously too arcadey and too micro intensive for my boomer brain.
imagine being intimidated by CoH2 30 apm ""mico""
why the fuck isnt the all out war edition available in the US? fuck this microtransaction cancer, these people need to be shot and dumped in a ditch
>>1020805Reminder to play the Strategic Reserves doctrine, every time.
>>1026011>not spamming penis battalionNGMI
>>1020805has op played only one fucking game in his entire life?
>>1027676>playing as the bad guyAllyfagging is not ngmi, it's somehow worse.
Seriously took me a bit to get used to it, when I first played it I was not a fan of the gameplay, especially in comparison to COH.But over time, it grew on me hard. Seriously one of the best RTS's ever made. Better than 1, almost on par with the original Starcraft. I might get flak for that statement but just remember I don't give a shit.
Coh 2 is a masterpiece of a gameMaybe not the deepest strategy game. It rewards quick thinking and precision. Almost an action strategy hybrid
>>1031048I believe that's called tactics, anon, real time tactics.
>>1031053Villain cannon fodder hands typed this post.
>>1024488I thought Spearhead is dead
I haven't played this game in years. What's a good commander and country to play if I like spamming infantry supported by artillery?I think I used to play mostly Soviets or maybe Wehrmacht.
>>1031534>a good commander and country to play if I like spamming infantry supported by artillery?any country really since everyone is blobbing nowadays. if youre talking about actual strategy then go Soviet because obviously. get any commander that gives conscript ppsh
>>1031534>>1031538Practically any armor is decent for mainline spam like he mentioned. I'd be careful with ppsh since those do take away your performance when firing at range. 7 man upgrade is now available at t4 for base soviet army, and it's a safer investment if you don't want to micro cqb. As for the arty half:US - Any army with calliope is going to work fine. OKW - You have the stuka in stock army, but if you want to rush it, recommend picking stuff like feursturm so you can skip T1 healing. UKF - Doctrines with sexton is a solid choice. They're surprisingly accurate so you can use it to even snipe idle tanks needing repairs. SOV - Katy is stock army so you' have that covered. Pick something to cover weaknesses until the katyusha is available. I'd avoid 152 howizters and B4, as while they are great, static emplacements can easily be deleted with an air strike. Wehr - Same as Sovs and OKW, you have a decent rocket truck in stock. And like Sov, you have static arty but they can be easily countered. Alternatively, spam mortar half tracks instead to have a mobile platform that is cheap and performs incredibly well. Smoke for infantry support and incendiary to remove static opponents.
>>1031776Sounds like I should go with the Wehrmacht. Any specific build order I should consider?
>>1031534Vanilla Germans, get joint ops, as soon as you have t2 you get your assrifles, stock MLRS and doctrinal howitzers get double output from the spotter squad. On smaller maps you get to wreck the enemy base from an entrenched center super easy.
>>1032711Second engie, cap points with priority for fuel, avoid engagement. First tech research, use saved up manpower to get a pzgren blob (3 squads usually work), melt enemy infantry, get more of their points. Once you have your future battery position, fortify with a heal/reinforce and mg bunkers. All the fuel you got while doing this should've gotten you to t2 by now, roll out the tanks for anti-armour (missile upgrade on pzgrens makes them shit anti-inf, don't do it unless you have no fuel and the other guy has already built a metal box). If using an army without howitzers and arty officer, just level up to final tech and get the launchers, otherwise build howitzers in your forward base and shell the git's HQ with them. About three howitzers, spotting officer and a couple tanks should get you a rather speedy base wipe.
can you still put scope on the elefant?
>>1032711That depends on the army you build. If we're specifically talking about the mortar halftrack cheese, then there's three things to consider. What map, what gamemode, what kind of teammate? Going Mortar halftrack typically is fine in any circumstance, but you want ideally large gamemodes and maps with narrow lanes or many shotblockers so your halftracks can fire away without having to worry about an immediate return fire. That said, having mortar halftracks also mean you don't want to build any mortars at the start, which means your teammate either has to cover early smoke/anti-machine gun options as well as maintaining a mainline around mid-game when you will burn manpower and fuel on mortar halftracks. They fortunately don't eat up much micro, but even then, you ideally want to have a teammate that is focused on maintaining a mainline composition so you don't get run over by a blob. With all that said, I'll fling a build order given an ideal teammate. T1 MG, Gren, MG (You will just cheese with double MG early game, gren exists to faust any early vehicle cheese. Rush for T2)Panzergren, Pak40, Mortar Halftrack, Mortar halftrack. Past this point, you can start filling whatever is on your mind. I'd still rush for more armor to bolster your front. Pioneers with flamers will start to get much stronger near late-game as all the craters your mortars create will result in a lot of random yellow cover, allowing your flamers to deal extra damage to enemy infantry in the craters.
>>1025354Any amount of micro is too much
>>1031534just blob conscript for sov, blob rifleman for usf, blob shrek capable troops with wehr/okweveryone is blobbing these day
Anyone here have tried COH3? How was it when compared to COH2?
>>1030043and yet even after that journey of understanding you still can't say more then "it good tho" of coh2
>>1036834CoH 3 played like a cartoon. Everything just looks so goofy. They need to fire whatever tranny told them "le mod support bad" and let autists fix what they fuck up.
>>1036834Faction design wise it's better, animation wise its amazing, tank-wise it was underwhelming in its presentation because most of it was very clearly unfinished.
>>1038179that doesn't tell me anything>>1039256oh cool, we'll how well they'll improve the final game then
>>1038142it IS good tho, it doesn't need any more explanation beyond that
>last patch 8 months ago>probably last one ever with CoH3 in the making>mod tools STILL not updated since 2020JESUS FUCK RELIC YOU DON'T EVEN CARE ABOUT THIS GAME AT THIS POINT JUST LET ME MOD I DON'T EVEN CARE ABOUT ADDING CUSTOM MODELS AT THIS POINT JUST LET ME TWEAK AND CHANGE THE CURRENT VERSION OF THE GAME AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
>>1020805This game is crap. Relic tried to innovate, didn't think it through properly, then Sega tried to walletfuck the players and intentionally fucked with the game balance to push microtransactions, and eventually they handed the keys over to a bunch of """pro""" players whose conception of "balance" is so divorced from what most people want from the game they've done nothing but make the game even worse.
>>1032734it's the same niggers who'll complain about multiplayer being filled with build order gookclickers.
>>1043091Well, the ""balance"" team intentionally set out to cater the game to buildorder gooks even though 95% of the playerbase are co-op compstompers, so I feel I have every right to complain.
>>1043092You don't participate in tournaments nor shape the meta for it thus saddly you don't.Nobody said that the majority is right.
>>1043094I don't give a fuck what the tryhards who want to pretend this RNG clusterfuck is Starcraft think the game should be.
>>1043092Compstompers don't care about balance. As long as they get flashy explosions and cool units, they will be happy.
>>1043322>flashy explosions and cool unitsthis is what every rts should be about
>>1043406i thought that it should be about commanding
>>1043517yes, commanding cool units that make the enemy explode flashily
>CoH3that... is a thing?Not even meming here
>>1043705Yes. Been around in development It isn't much at the moment. We'll have to wait and see if it turns into anything worth the time.
>>1020980I hope that spergout's topic was how the zero airplane was organized in squadrons and not in companies.
>>1043705there was open alpha in 2021
welp playerbase boost incoming, sseth made a video about CoH 2
not like this cohbros...
hey hey wehrmacht
I remember my first MP game. It was against a USF player who has never played against OKW before. He thought that Kubel could suppress and always retreated when he saw one flanking him. I basically spent that whole match with unlimited force retreat ability.
kubel COULD suppress back then
>>1032734>>1043091yeah, this thread is peak /vst/>>1043092I can't tell if this is a joke or not, goddamn
>>1035058I haven't played it in years but surely you can still just pick OKW/US and attack move with your infantry blob.
>>1046655Aheago Panzer IV is the peak of humanity>>1046656My first game was in pre-THQ collapse alphaWhere soviet Zis guns had unlimited, free and vet 0 artillery mode.And instead of standard barbed wire they could create WWI wired no-man zones. It was so anti-fun no wonder they deleted it in SEGA beta.Also mortars had range from base to the middle of map.
>>1046655>he only plays vs ai>he thinks its hard Lmao
Wehrmacht design in CoH3 is some next level autism shit
if i get a global key for master edition, and a key for all out war europe edition, will the AOW DLC at least activate in US? Anyone tried this combo?
>>1020805you mean that shitty game that came prepackaged with every pre-built gaming rig? HARD PASS
I just picked this game up, anyone want to play some vs games against AIs? I prefer playing these kinds of games with friends but most of mine are too brainlet for strategy games
>>1049866They are too brainlet against AI?>>1049973That did it!
>>1020805>DOOD CHECK OUT THIS TOTALLY AWESOME GAME MY FAVE E-CELEB PLAYEDGod this place is just nu-/v/.
>>1020805Fuck off. Sseth is a fine youtuber but you legions of retard fans make his content nigh-unwatchable>HEY HEY PEOPLEFuck off
>>1050100>>1050102Who? This game is like 10 years old, personally, I'm not faggot OP, but I play it because I played the first one, I'm not one to care about E-"celebs"
>>1050100>>1050102Look at the date the OP was posted, retard-tachi
With CoH1 are the expansion pack downloads redundant or do I need to download them as well?
>>1050100>>1050102Op has been making this same thread for months
>>1050102you okay buddy?
>>1050743It really depends where you're downloading it from.
>>1050868oops I meant to mention I have the steam version but I just read that the CoH steam version has everything included.
>>1050886I think it depends, if you had bought the old version you would have 3 separate games, one for the base game and one for each of the two expansion packs and you would launch the latest expansion pack to play all the content, with the Steam version that's all in one, you would get everything in one if you had already owned everything before, but a quick way to check is launching the game, if it looks like pic related, you have everything, here you can see 6 campaigns, and they are all unlocked, if some of them look darker and with a padlock on top of them then I think you would have to buy them separately as DLC.
>>1050935yeah i already seen it had everything and its set as DLC
I'm retarded and my Google is broken. Is the game supposed to look like this? The HUD seems to take a big chunk of the screen and the main camera seems zoomed in or something. How the hell do I reconfigure keybindings so I can move the camera with WASD?
>camera seems zoomed>move the camera with WASDhow to spot a clueless shitter
>>1052680>CODEX has joined the matchbased
>>1052680Yeah the big black box in middle is intentional.Yes, it is retarded.I remember trying to force some sense into dev how stupid it is when OG THQ still owned Relic.
>>1046655>SsethI don't know what his videos are, but they sure as fuck aren't reviews.
>>1046655I could beat Seth in CoH2
>>1052795there are no reviewers on youtube, only influencers.
>>1052680Yes, that's all intentional, HUD is yuge, but if you use resolutions larger than 1080p (even by downsampling or using DSR/VSR) you can scale it down which helps, the camera is very zoomed in, you can zoom out slightly, but it still looks awful.>>1052696The camera could be further away, it really feels claustrophobic after playing other RTS/RTT games, and WASD camera is nice and works well in games like World in Conflict, it's not a bad idea.
>the map is too zoomed in, I can't see anything>btw I move around the map in the slowest, most inefficient way possibleI wonder if these two complaints are in some way connected
>>1053058You'd really defend the hilariously zoomed in camera? Relic said they don't allow you to zoom out because it's more "cinematic" this way, it's fucking awful being attacked by shit that's off the screen or near the border of the screen, when there's not really a practical reason for the camera being like that, other than maybe performance reasons.And you really need to play more strategy games, WASD movement on these kind of games can be really good, it frees your mouse to only deal with micro while you can could still use some hotkeys from time to time when you don't have to move the camera, of course, Relic thinks giving more options to the player on how to customize their experience is a waste of time, apparently.
>>1053062>WASD movement on these kind of games can be really good
>>1053066Alright, buddy, I accept your concession, unless... You'd like to show your 1v1 rank/ladder position?
>>1052680You could make the HUD this size (or even smaller, there's a slider for its size once you go beyond 1080p), if you don't mind playing in 4k, unfortunately, it makes the cursor smaller.Whoops.
>>1053062Well coh3 is really zoomed out so you should be happy
>>1053714It would take a lot more than that for me to be happy for a Relic's game after CoH1, but we'll see
>>1053079Why those fuckers can't just make a customizable UI, where you could place specific elements wherever you want, turn off the mostly useless ones like the huge-ass unit description or scale them however the fuck you want. If that one guy who made Banished can do that with UI made out of windows containing spreadsheets and text, then single A company can do so with minimap, gridkeys, etc.
>>1047787this "review" is literally the embodiment of all the problems with /vst/
>>1054148Relic is just shit, however, for Coh 3 they're making a much more minimalistic HUD, it doesn't looks as nice, but it let's you see a lot more of the game, so it's an upgrade.
why the fuck is master collection not on steam? whoever's behind this game's monetization are beyond jews
>>1054360Speaking of, have they said anything about mods yet? I need autists to just fuck my shit up and make the game 10x harder with realism mods.
>>1054360Good, that's how it should be. They can prettify it however they want, as long as it's not taking a 3rd of my screen. Though it's kind of dumb how are they moving the unit icons from top right to bottom and doctrine/commander abilities from bottom-middle to right.>>1054387Not that Anon, but somehow I doubt they will do it. CoH1 modding was bootleg, but lent itself to some amazing projects. CoH2 had actual support, but with far more limitations than CoH1. It's just a hunch, but I bet they'll try the drip-feeding-content model again, since it brings money.
I liked Sseth's review of this game. It's hard to really get in-depth when covering games like Coh2, nor does it really mean much to people just hearing about it. That said, I hope we can ride the brief attention to get some new players in. So we can stomp them into the dirt. Or show them how to play, but let's not kid ourselves.
>>1054841an influx of wehraboos playing against easy ai on mods to just turtle for 2 hours changes absolutely nothing
>>1054447Dunno why they suddenly hate the modding community. It can literally only improve the game and sell more copies.
>>1054841he could have done a lot better, either he got sick of doing this or he hired an editor, did the voiceover and collected the paypiggy shekelsI mean all he did was list the features with actual gameplay/stock WWII footage playing in the background and showed off anime decals for a bitit's not a review (none of his videos are) and it's not a complete ADD mess that has barely anything to do with the actual game (which is what I watch his videos for)>>1052680>>1054360I like the CoH2 slab HUD morefeels more organised and solid (here's HUD, he're the rest of the game)CoH3 minimalistic one is just shit scattered all over the place
>>1055552>I like the CoH2 slab HUD moreI agree, it looks and feels like it's really a "part of the game" if that makes sense, same with the one in CoH1, but it's undeniable that the one in CoH 3 let's you see more of the game, which is really good.
>>1055332>Dunno why they suddenly hate the modding community. It can literally only improve the game and sell more copies.I wouldn't say that they hate it, but I think their silence on modding is telling. If they wanted to market it, they would at least say "yes, it will be there". Plus, people playing mods could be paying to play DLC.
>>1043086this tbqh, I'm so fucking pissed at the absolute state of the game now. It feels totally fucked compared to a year or two ago. Can't wait for a (hopefully) more balanced game in CoH3. Everyone spams weird build orders and the name of the game seems to be blobbing moreso than ever.
>>1050100You are PROFOUNDLY fucking dumb lol
>>1056280>Can't wait for a (hopefully) more balanced game in CoH3.You should probably lower your expectations, a lot.
99% of balance complains are a skill issue. It's so easy to snowball your advantages as a better player in CoH games that faction balance is not even a factor.
>>1056392Yeah. There's a lot of ladder climbers who have told me that abusing a certain composition is enough to beat most.
>>1035058Go play Graviteam:Tactics
>>1050100Based. Nu-/v/ absolutely seething at this.Go find a better E-celeb, trannies.
>>1056392>>1056480This actually proves the balance is kind of fucked.>Learn meta commander (Like Guard Motor Coordination for Soviets or Elite Armored for OKW) to a T and have a build order set up>Easily climb ranks, even reaching top 50 without that much effort.You're not gonna see the same happening with the commanders that are considered weak.
>>1056767>have a build order set upnigga, do you just hop in the game and pray for the best? no wonder you keep on whining
>>1056837No, well sometimes, but you seem to have only quoted that part instead of the whole thing... What I meant is that these people that can quickly raise in the ladder by using OP commanders obviously fit these units into their build order, for example getting double guards or double 120mm mortars, and they fit these into their build order because they're OP as fuck, hence, the balance is shit, is it more clear now? They're not neccesarily skilled, they are mostly abusing units that are overpowered.
>>1056853And what's stoping you from playing meta strats yourself? Is you idea of "perfect balance" being able to just spam whatever units you want and get the same results?
>>1056860It's boring to do the same shit everytime, which is why I go out of my way to not use meta shit, I know I shouldn't expect much from the balance team or Relic, but yeah, I'd like for more units to viable, that's not unreasonable, is it?
>>1056055Go on, whine some more. It won't make your NPC villain faction any less cringe.
>>1056767Do you never lose units? Does your opponent never surprise you with an off-placed mine? Does you AT Gun never miss that last finishing shot? There are so many ways for things to go off your pre-planned course, that even if you play games with same build orders, same commanders and on the same map, they will play out differently. Snowballing is a thing in pretty much every RTS.>>1056392>balance is not a factor>what is Dank Hunters back when mass PTRS melted heavy tanks and weapon teams with deflection damage>what is Elite Troops on release>what is Soviet Windustry on release>what is Advanced Cancer Regiment on release>what is Prostruppen back when their slot items were not affected by their accuracy penalty and they could freely convert munis into manpower
>>1020813best RTS of all timeeconomy is fucking gay
>>1056989>best RTS of all timeyou clearly haven't played many RTS games>economy is fucking gaybecause it doesn't exist?
>>1056975>Do you never lose units? Does your opponent never surprise you with an off-placed mine? Does you AT Gun never miss that last finishing shot? There are so many ways for things to go off your pre-planned course, that even if you play games with same build orders, same commanders and on the same map, they will play out differently. Snowballing is a thing in pretty much every RTS.Of course, but you have better odds when you use the meta shit.
>>1057004>Of course, but you have better odds when you use the meta shit.Yes, but it doesn't mean you'll get that win every time. After you go through all the shitters on the ladder, you'll start meeting other meta shit, often picked specifically to counter your meta shit.Though I'll admit that Guard Motor is meta since day 1, because it's got almost all bases covered. Elite long range infantry? Check. Premium medium that can go head to head with Axis mediums? Check. Mark Target for reliably penetrating Axis heavies? Check. Heavy mortar and crew repairs are less impactful, but still great. It loses a bit steam in 2v2 and 3v3+ clusterfucks, since having recon and off-maps for deleting artillery is almost mandatory.
https://youtu.be/Ywr8O71_KWoMissed the first series on Twitch FFSDoes anybody know when the next one is?
>>1057080Is guard motor really good? Yeah. Is guard motor OP meta cancer with no counterplay? Not even close.Also lmao at discussing teamgames
>>1056767>>Learn meta commander (Like Guard Motor Coordination for Soviets or Elite Armored for OKW) to a T and have a build order set up>>Easily climb ranks, even reaching top 50 without that much effort.Show us rank
>>1057105Show us playercard, not some random screenshot
>>1057109I'm not gonna dox myself, anon, you can try to reverse search the image if you don't believe that's me, 130~ is not even that high of a rank so I don't know why it would be hard to believe.
>>1057111Actually, I just realized you could somewhat easily get to my player card just from that screenshot, so maybe I just kind of doxxed myself, at least a little bit.
>>1057111>>1057115>Elite Armor>metaPost your playercard
>>1046655He just plays against so lole.
>>1057121It may not be that meta, but it's certainly very strong with the HEAT shells and the 221 start, anyway, fuck it, here's my player card, I trust you'll share yours now, right?
>>1057131I kneel anonmy rank is inactive, but I last competed 14-16 with AEF and 15-17 OKW
>>1057152What a tweest.>15-17 OKWI'm kinda working on that but I'm only 14 OKW now, how come you stopped playing btw?
>>1057131>HEAT shellsUnnecessary muni drain unless the t-34-85 shows up>and the 221 start1 trick pony, if you pull it off you have strong fuel presence otherwise you will lose a large early fuel investmentElite Armor is nowhere near meta, it's passable at best
>>1057159>Unnecessary muni drain unless the t-34-85 shows upMore damage on demand is unnecessary? I don't know anon, even agaisnt T34-76s it's good, it's just more raw damage.
>>1057156You'll get to it, hoping I get to be good at AEF and SOVI was like 10-12 UKF over being unable to cope with their engineer only snare and I dropped them completely, also my AEF must have been 14 circa at the time because I was matched with your OKW>how come you stopped playingI had a massive backlog that i almost completed and also work so I have like 10 matches only with the last patch, planning to restart soon hoping I haven't already lost all the hotkeys muscle memory so I'm just hopping in /vst/ threads here and there
>>1057167It keeps any medium within a 4 shots to kill unless a snare was used on itIt can be situationally great, or it can have no effectIt becomes really useful against heavies and t-34-85, but considering only t-34/85 are somewhat meta after KV-1 and ram nerf that makes it a situational counter221 can be strong against USF, and can be very useful in actually locking down a fuel so that, when supported, that sector becomes much harder to take over (vetted 223 on lockdown is a surprisingly resilient pain in the ass) and synergizes with the Flak HQ, but that can also backfire, 223 needs to pay for its cost and costs a lotAgain, not a bad doctrine, but to say that it's meta is weirdIt used to be before the Sturmtiger nerf
>>1057176I never liked UKF too much, I'm 11 with them currently because I tried them again yesterday and got that rank, but I think they're just unfun, maybe if get very bored of all the other factions I'll try them again.>planning to restart soonNice.
By the way am I just retarded or is this unit a pain in the ass to actually make it workI'm sure it's strong once the dps snowballing kicks in but holy shit it is completely useless dps wise early game and robs me of a volk or raketen while taking forever to vet upShould I just git gud?
>*It's useless in your path*Why wouldn't you just pick a command Panzer IV?You get better AI with less micro, a turret, actually countering T-70s and you can still use smoke with a paid ability that delivers it faster
>>1057200If you mean by Sturm Officer, they're "good" in the sense of having an obers squad as early as cp 2. No LMG, I know, but even with Kar98, they do pretty well. The forced retreat and focus fire are all strong utility too.
>>1057206>>1057206Stug E gets good at vet 2 and very good at 3, also, it's very cheap, especially good against blobbing and if you can micro it and attack ground with it will fuck enemy infantry, soviets larger 6-7 man squads even more so.
>>1043086This guy gets it.
>>1047787Having problem with guy playing his own game. Idk why you salty. Whatever the fuck he's doing "wrong", he's doing it in his own "house". No need to shame. I wouldn't even shame a person playing vs easy bots only, simply because it has nothing to do with me.
>>1050098My best friend plays exclusively SP games and LoL so unfortunately I understand this anon...
>>1056291They're salty a guy can make easy buck just by his easy-going persona.
>>1052795I'm working in hotel which has 5 stars in name but isn't 5 star hotel so Sseth isn't biggest offender here
>>1054375Just buy from keyshops. I'd shill price comparing website but idk how /vst/ jannies react on those
>>1057091Most players stick to team games.
>>1043086Very truthful and yet the game is enjoyable, how did they do it?
>>1057398Graphics are not cartoony shit. It's the same era of relic as DoW2, which unlike the plastic looking parts 1 and 3 was based off Forgeworld's models and painting style. FW were massive historical wargaming nerds, and their influence spilled over into CoH2. Compare it with hollyshit pulp of the first game and the "green army men" look of the sequel's test builds, without that influence lelics consistently shit the bed.
>>1043086Thing is, even when Relic gave balance into the hands of community team, they gave them plenty of restrictions. For example, no patch made by them barring the last one added new infantry textures into the game. I think the closest thing was adding the antenna to 221 to make it into 223 for Elite Armour. Also, I think I remember someone from the balance team mentioning that they can't do all they want back when US teching got reworked and again when they added 7-man upgrade to Cons.
>>1020805What the fuck is the point of the t-34 ram? It does no almost no damage and only stuns the enemy for 1 s before they use their gay blitzkrieg speedboost to reverse out of any danger while your tank always becomes immobile so basicaly youre wasting 90 fuel to stun for 1s
>>1057530for role playing
>>1057530When was the last time you played? Currently it damages engine while also disabling weapons and slowing down the target by 75% for 5 seconds. All of that is applied regardless whether the ram penetrates or not - if it's deflected, it deals 80 damage instead of 160. Combine with IL-2 Rocket Strafe or Anti-tank Overwatch or some other AT off-map and even the heaviest of tanks get wrecked.
This game demoralizes me. I used to be able to consistently beat expert AI 1v1. Now I can't even make it to T4 on the same map with the same commander. Growing old sucks.
>>1057268Three men Obers squad at the same timing of Shocks is an awful deal
https://www.twitch.tv/aecohHH vs JJJ
>>1057643There is just no use case exept if you have a 1hp t34 and just yolo it, otherwise youre bether off just repairing your tank and hope for a bether opprotunity to kill your enemy
>>1024488Spearhead II mod is fun yea but absolutely not balanced
>>1057689>There is just no use case exept if you have a 1hp t34 and just yolo itIf ramming a damaged heavy and dropping an off-map on top of it guarantees a kill, then it's better than giving ground to repair and trying to plink away at its armor again.
It started boys
>>1057738What? The noob flood?
>>1057696I don't want balance, I want the War as it was. If a Pak 40 one shots my Sherman or a P-51 bombs my tank as soon as I deploy it, then fine.
>>1057816why play CoH then?
>>1057819It's fun! Game is very reactive and cinematic. Not quite a simulator but realistic enough so I don't need to dedicate a couple hours to take 1 village.
>>1057663Expert AI is the wrong kind of challenge, they have a lot more resources than you and will have tanks and other more expensive shit before you, they do not know how to retreat properly so you can always punish that, but seriously they are just shit to play agaisnt, consider playing matchmaking, at least team games, it will feel more rewarding.
I haven't played this or any other RTS in ages, balance feels very different now and i don't really like it, soviets feel the most familiar but are obviously more micro intensive. What's are the fotm commanders for US and Soviets right now?
>>1057926>but are obviously more micro intensive.They aren't>What's are the fotm commanders for US and Soviets right now?Airborne, Heavy Cavalry, Tactical Support, Mechanized, Rifle Airborne, Guard Rifle, Guard Motor, Shock Rifle, Defensive Tactics, Armored Assault
>>1057926>Soviet>Micro-intensiveNigga you have an early game unit that counter literally everything. Penal is your all in one anti-infantry, anti-MG, anti-light tanks, anti-the-whole-OKW
>>1058434Elite factions are always easier to play.
>>1058453Nigga try playing OKW and see how easy it is.
>>1058434That's why you don't play esports faggot "balance patches", roll out the mods and be happy.
is EUROPE the only region where you can buy the All Out War edition? Grinding for these commanders seems like a massive pain in the ass
I've been exclusively playing 3v3, 4v4 vs AI for the past couple of years.Is this a sign of autism?
>>1059234no. I like 4v4 too because there is more room for mistakes. I once lost two KT in one game and still won because my team is made of turbo autists. Less shit flinging too because everything is so chaotic that no one knows who's to blame when shit happens.
>>1058496it really is. You have tools for everything that's needed and technically you don't even need a commander.
>>1059302>>1058651OKW has some inherent issues in their tech order that is more apparent when savvy players abuse it. For one, you have no counter to snipers other than using JLI or 221, and even then that expecting opponents make a bad positioning move. Even then, your counters come much later than the sniper. Soviets can also abuse the fact you don't get fausts straight away to rush clown cars. The same relation goes for British UC starts and even with a raketen, decent players will just back up for a repair. You also have no smoke until unlocking T1, although a counterargument can be made the leig is so nice you more or less will always pick it up anyways. In summary, fairly awkward early game against people who target you as you have no access to tools to make counters easy.
>>1059343That's why you play mods with German subfaction mergers, like angriff. Fixes every tech issue right away.
>>1059404>That's why you play modswtf
>>1020805First one is better
>>1059562Vanilla is shit. No units, everything doctrine locked, gimped upgrades. It's all stinking garbage, get some tuning packs.
>>1059696I've only tried tuning packs a couple of times and they're fun for a couple runs. That said, I prefer vanilla over modded packs, especially content that just unlocks all the units, as balance is easier to appreciate in automatch. No doctrine or strategy has every tool available, so there's at least one or another weakness to exploit. This is just my take as an automatcher. I feel the same isn't as important versus AI since they have their own tricks up their sleeves.
>>1059343This is why I think Faust should be tier 1 like AT is for panzerfusiliers. It's utterly retarded how I have to stick with Breakthrough or Grand Offensive to stand a chance in the early game.
>>1059738>pvpfagThere's no saving you, it's incurable.
>>1059751It's been something that has been argued for a long while. OKW definitely hurts without fausts early game and it more or less default to teching quick or keeping fuziliers on speed dial once you spot or hear light vehicles roaming. That said, with how fast you can plop down a med truck, I think the window for light vehicles to cause havoc is at best around the first couple of minutes. Personally, I agree that early fausts should just be universal, but given that other than wehrmacht and brits, everyone has to tech for AT nades one way or another, it's hard to justify that sort of change without shifting a lot of balance.
>>1059758>having fun with AI that no semblance of strategic thinking and maphack artillery you all the timeyeah blowing up vet 0 kubelwagen that runs straight into your tank/ AT 30 minutes into the game every 2 minute is so fun
I hope that there will be 3 German factions in COH3.>Wehrmacht>Afrika korps>Waffen-SS (or whatever their sanitized name is)Italy can be rolled into the DAK and other Axis power can be rolled into the SS as foreign volunteers
>>1059806I believe they will have Italy show up mostly as partisan resistance, but I don't think it is going to gloss over the fact that there are Italians on both sides
>>1059805That's why you set the AI's faction to commie or burger, now that clown car suicide is historical accuracy.
>>1059758I'm sorry you're braindead.
>>1060383I'm not, unlike the pvp esports metacucks. If you play ranked, you are a gelded chinaman twink for life.
>I'm not like other giiiiiirls
>>1060429It must sure take a looooooot of effort to win against shitty AI.
>>1060450>>1060611>>1060861Lmao pvptards giga mad
>>1060429>>1061312Mod brain into yourself
>>1061312CoH AI is retarded, it has no clue when to retreat
>>1057689Trading a 300mp and 90 fuel tank+~200 muni call-in to kill their 700mp and ~270 fuel tank is definitely worth it
>>1057926USF is way more micro intensive (vech crews, Sherman at/he shells, needing to constantly close distance with rifles, light vehicle dependency (especially the hell that is the AA HT)). Soviets is comfy levels of micro
>>1057689Nigga, you do realize how cheap a 34 is in comparison to Axis tanks, right? Trading 90 fuel to anchor and damage a 140 fuel tank is always worth it.
>>1061434Caremad>>1062403Once again, that's why you set it to allied armies. They were still mentally in 19th century, so it only adds historical accuracy.
Giving you to a retard isn't going to make it stop
Congratulations Anon! Relic has asked you (yes you!) to make one change to each faction that would actually improve the overall balance. The only caveats are that you cannot add any new assets to the game and the changes must be as weird as possible. What do you change?
>>1062505allycuck caremad, stay butthurt
>>1059758>>1060429>>1061312>>1062470>>1063057timmy, it's time to do your homework
>>1059120I live in Africa and I can get itMust be an Amerimutt thing
>>1057816Wikinger mod is probably as close as you can get to that
OKW needs an armored transport. Opel Blitz is too fragile to be useful.
>>1063133Opel Blitz is more for reinforcing and medic anyways. OKW do indeed have no armored transport though,
>>1057206stug E is fucking broken, at rank 2 he fucking outranges AT guns, and that accuracy jesus
>>1063051Revert MG formation update.People should be punished with deathloop for poorly placed MG.
>>1058434not really they get rekt by MGs like any infantry, that's why you play with your werhmacht OKnoob
>>1058434Tier 1 is a massive gamble that only pans out if you're better than your opponent and turbo stomp themIf it's even he's just going to get a medium and his infantry will be way better by that point, and then it's a really though game against huge deadly blobs that have ridiculous veterancy bonuses and weapons, while having to micro and mine everything to protect your SUs
>>1063258What? The formation was changed to solve the problem of elite squads like LMG Obers or LMG Paras continuously lasering down gunners while charging from the front, not letting them fire even a single full burst. It was retarded.
>>1063258fuck that, i once had two maxim lose to a Falschi blob and that's post updatekys OKblobtard
>>1062412how close should my riflemen be to a fight?
>>1063541It largely depends on what you're going up against and if you're using the commander that unlocks the M1919 LMG, If you're using normal Riflemen with/or without BARs, then you want to be at mid range or closer, think of medium range as the mid point between being right on top of them and being at max range, about 15~ units of range, this mostly applies to early game against Volksgrenadiers, Panzerfusiliers, Osttrupen and Grenadiers, these units are better at max/long range, expect to lose against these units if they're parked behind cover, if you can close the distance by covering the approach with smoke or by breaking line of sight then you will have the advantage.If you have Riflemen with M1919s then you can use them just like Grenadiers with LMG42.If the enemy is strong at close range, like Panzergrenadiers, Assault Grenadiers, Sturmpioneers, Pioneers, etc, then attack at max range and stick to cover if possible, they will have to get closer to do any significant damage to you and will most likely lose half or more of their models closing the distance, this applies no matter what weapons you're using and doubly so if you have no weapon upgrades at all.
>>1063563this may be a retarded question, but if my riflemen without an m1919 have green cover against a long range unit in green cover, what should i do? i normally just stay in green cover and let the mortar/whatever help since i thought it'd be retarded to run at them and try to close the distance.
>>1063584In that scenario I see 2 options, you could do as you say and let the mortar + riflemen combo deal with the enemy, you should definitely win that no matter what, but it might take some time, specially if the mortar is attacking from max range, making it less accurate.You could also drop smoke right on top of the long range unit, and then close in with the rifleman, assuming both squads are equally healthy, without weapon upgrades, and are so close to each other as to negate any cover bonuses, the riflemen will win.
>>1063316Yes, I'm aware that it's meant to counteract gunners getting constantly downed forcing retreat because they didn't get suppression down straight away. This is an issue I find more common with misplays of unsupported MGs that are not set up ahead of time. Maxims are the exception in this, as they need this formation given how much they can struggle, but .50cals and dshk have had a much easier time turning around and suppressing without the same concern for gunner death loops after the update. It's not a popular opinion, but I figured I'd toss an uncommon change rather than something everyone has harped on about for years.>>1063368Also, fuck you fag I play mostly Soviets and I still hold this opinion. You probably spam team weapons.
>>1063584I'd add that you can simply choose to disengage if both are at long range by walking around shotblockers. There's no reason to commit to a scenario where you have to make the risk. Go for a cut off or flank where you can more reasonably put yourself at a good range instead. Riflemen do best at range 5-10 against other mainline infantries (Volks, Grens), excluding m1919 upgrade situations. If that is confusing, range 5 is slightly longer the length of an armored truck from head to tail. Against units with better close range damage (Sturms early game, as an example), you can still commit to the engagement if they approach from range, as your dps will ramp up the more they close in. With cover + their movement accuracy penalty, you can typically drop models and forcce their retreat, or retreat early and at least deal some manpower drain before disengaging.
>>1063619Just one upgraded Ober or Fall squad can very easily frontally decrew MGs, unsupported or otherwise, it's dumb, your opinion is not popular and uncommon precisely because it's just not good.
>>1063628Then the question is:Why shouldn't a 340 manpower unit with 60+ munition cost have a chance to win against something around 240~260 manpower unit?
>>1063644Because the 240-260 unit's job in this case is to neutralize the 340 manpower unit, especially when said 340 mp unit attacks from the front, right in the 240-260's firing arc, that's really the problem, now this is more of a Maxim vs Ober/Fall problem, Maxim is kind of shit and Ober/Fall are very good, hence the somewhat controversial change of HMG crew positioning, I'm fine with getting fucked hard by obers if they completely flank and negate the firing arc, but as it was it was kind of ridiculous, at least this way Maxims have more of a chance to do its job.
>>1063656Riddle me this then, batman. It's safe to assume that you're going by the angle that MGs are anti-infantry. They neutralize infantry. But I could just as comfortably insist that the same could be implied in reverse. Why else do you build obers and falls? To cap maps? It's not like they have snares like mainline. No. They are anti-infantry too.
>>1063105where did you buy it from? All the key site list it as EU. I'm in east asia.
>>1063661HMGs are inti-infantry not neccesarily because they can kill infantry fast, but because they can suppress them and essentially keep them out of the fight, that's what I meant by neutralizing them, just to be clear.Obers and Falls are most certainly very strong anti-infantry, but they should not be able to run into an HMG's arc, stand still there and kill the whole crew, especially if you had spotted and starting firing at them before they could fire at you, if they flank, or quickly get out of the arc, then by all means, wipe the HMG's crew, I can't be mad at that, but just not from the front, not from the firing arc.
>>1063671Alright. That's clear enough. MG should win against infantry that stand in their arc. I think that's fair. But I'm going to circle back to previous post I made about certain MGs able to more or less survive flanks by turning and not getting gunner death-looped via the new formation. Before that, flanking them was the go to, but now there's a good chance they just whirl straight around and tank the initial damage with two models not on the gun. What should we do? Nerf the MGs specifically?
>>1063678It's tricky to balance, maybe slightly increase the set up time? Now that they have an easier time avoiding getting deathlooped due to the new formation they can perhaps have a lenghtier set up time, not that I trust the people in charge of balancing the CoH 2 to get fix that in decent way...
I support Ober being able to outfight MG. They are a late game unit with limited utility anyway. Let them have their niche as both anti-infantry and anti-MG. Fallscrim shouldn't though. They are available too early and can deploy from everywhere.
>Less units, meaning less micro.>Units with powerful long range damage and infantry based AT mean that attack moving is more effective.>MGs and tanks mean that you will win any frontal engagement.Explain how axis aren't braindead as fuck?
>>1063723because the soviets are more braindead.
>>1063733With soviets you literally don't win any engagement by default, you have to outplay them.
>>1063733Soviets are unironically harder than Both Ostheer/Wehrmacht and OKW; they lack the tools these two factions have, their support weapons are infinitely worse, their standard tanks are outperformed and are so fragile that a single infantry AT squad can bring them down and until VERY recently could not build any fortifications at all
>>1063909What tools do Soviets lack? T2 start gives you the standard crews and conscripts have arguably more utility than grens. Maxims don't suppress better than an MG42 unless it turns on sustained fire, but it has more models and thus harder to wipe. Soviet mortar is arguably one of the best because it has flares, which is an invaluable intel tool in comparison to counter barrage. The AT gun is hardly anything to complain about, as the pen value is only 10 less than a pak40, which is more than made up for by the barrage skill that gives it an extra layer of utility. Tanks-wise, sure, they have less armor value, but if you're complaining about the T-34, they are incredibly cost effective. Plus, the tank has exceptionally high anti-infantry damage as both the hull and frontal MG were buffed. The only way "Single AT Squad" which I assume is a panzergren with rockets or Sturmpioneers has a chance to kill one is if you stood perfectly and just allowed the T-34 to die without facing it to wash them down with MG and main gun.
>>1064467Honestly the only thing that I think Soviets lack is a non-squishy infantry high vision unit, you've got the scout car and the T70, but something like pioneers would be nice.
>>1064518Cons scale very well for their weaker early game durability. 7 man squads with 0.7 received accuracy is incredible. If they were to get base line buffs, the upgrades would need to be nerfed.
>>1064644Yeah, Cons really are good, but I just meant to have some sort of scout infantry, but I guess abilities like the mortar's flares, cons tripwires and stuff like that is supposed to be the Soviet player vision
>>1064682Yeah. There's also the option for going snipers, though that's quite micro-intensive compared to a fire and forget flare.
Is it just me or is the Jagdpanzer with HEAT rounds retardedly op? For only 135 fuel and 35 munitions, you get a tank that outranges most medium and has KT level of penetration. And that fucking shit can camouflage.
>>1065413Tank destroyers are only OP until you get close to them or force them to move. The gun traverse on all SPGs is garbage, so don't let them shell you from far away where they get a bigger field of fire. Get closer, turn that field into an easily avoidable tunnel, and blow them up. Oh, and they don't have MGs, rocket infantry is extra happy.
I used to be top 100 in this game and I can absolutely promise you that COH2 is shit and Relic are some of the shittiest in the industry. I can't think of a single update they have ever done that didn't break something else. Shitty designers, shitty balancers, and shitty people too, it's a fucking mess. I remember Luvnest on stream once, someone asked him how they can get into COH2 and he just told them that "You should never get into this game because it will never pay you back, the devs will never care enough and you'll just end up disappointed." He knew the truth.
>>1057200The removal of officer AOE buffs makes them pointless and the only reason they seem to still be in the game is because then they'd have to think about what to replace them with.I understand they wanted to discourage blobbing, which is what officers do, but there isn't anything inherently wrong with a massed attack - it takes only one machinegun you didn't anticipate to rout the entire attack and they're obviously susceptible to shellfire. Do they work pretty well when the enemy isn't expecting them? Sure. But only because COH has stupidly short LOS, meaning you can suddenly pop out of the FOW with 3 squads and overrun a lone unit. A game that so heavily emphasizes close quarter combat will always have this problem.
newfag here, how good are guards rifles? How do they match up to other equivalents?
>>1066258Elite troops that can handle both infantry and vehicles with decent results. I don't think you can go wrong with adding them into your roster. With LMG upgrades you can get quite a lot of damage out. Some players cheese by spamming guards into a deathball, as they can pin mediums with button and plink away at them with multiple PTRS, while just as comfortably turning around to hose infantry with DP-28s. tldr: Bretty gud
>>1020809well the more you know then! fun fact of the day then :p
>haven't played in a year>reinstall>all the commanders have been fiddled with, destroying several>most of the commanders I now actually want are paid (ie I don't have them)The fact the Expert AI still isn't really a challenge outside of 4v4 (the resource advantage snowballs) wasn't even the biggest disappointment, it was the fact they fucked with all the commanders. I can't believe, after all these years, they had the fucking GALL to fuck with the Soviet Mechanized commander and the Wehr Jaeger Armor commander because they think they were 'too good' and the dive bomber is 'cheap'. Those commanders were fucking PERFECT and now I don't even want to use them. Fuck these dipshits, and fuck Relic for giving them the keys to the kingdom while they fucked off doing nothing for half a decade.
>>1066306Mind sharing which mechanized tactics you are talking about? Most of 2021 update for Commanders were buffs rather than nerfs. Especially so for Soviets. Mechanized didn't even get rearranged far as changelogs go that I can find. As for Jaeger armor, you lose out on stuka dive bomb for breakthrough equipment. The change grants panzergrens smoke grenades and pioneers get satchel charges and destroy cover. Both are great utilities in their own right. These bonuses come in much sooner than a stuka dive bomb. You also skipped over the fact that 251 halftrack retains the riegal mines while gaining free cloak + detection via observation post. Again, bonuses that kick in much sooner for wehrmacht. The only nerf besides losing stuka dive bomb is spotting scopes on elefants. And I think most would agree that a super tank able to self spot is ridiculous. And before you mention Su-85, that tank got its spotting range nerfed recently as well.
>>1066341Jaeger Armor was one of the only commanders that was actually synergistic rather than a collection of random shit like most commanders. All of its abilities worked together wit the goal of disabling/destroying armor at a distance. The dive bomb was a perfect part of this because it allowed you to destroy tanks your units couldn't hit as long as they hit one of your riegels. Sure, breakthrough equipment is fine, but it doesn't actually mesh with the others, it's just there because the balance team doesn't like dive bomb.FFIW I don't even think things like the Elefant or Jagdtiger should be in the game, they're just tanknerd pandering. Jaeger Armor probably should have had the Tiger, but they were adamant on release about only putting the Tiger in commanders you had to pay for.
>>1066258About the same stats as Grenadiers, waste slots on AT rifles. You're better off getting the SMG version, it can give you a missile launcher through upgrades.
>>1066815Assault guards are shit, and AT rifles are certainly not wasted on them, they're so accurate they can often hit infantry and deal a whole lot of damage, the double LMG upgrade also does a lot of damage, you're insane.
>>1066824Any and all ATRs are garbage that you should avoid. And how are they shit when they are a slightly downgraded Ass Gren squad that can be turned into tubers? You sound like a pleb that lost to a blobber, literally worst strategy ever.
>>1066835They are bad compared to Guard Rifles, the grenade volley is easy to dodge, and while zookas are good on them, you still wouldn't rely on that to actually kill tanks, the manpower bleed will be crazy, their thompson upgrade is also meh, they are very strong, if you can get close, when Guards Rifles are just a-move to win.>Any and all ATRs are garbage that you should avoid.They used to be that way, until they got buffed recently, now they're nice, and Guards Rifle's PTRS are the best PTRSs in the game due how often they can hit infantry.
>that one patch where PTRS were broken>they would instakill any team weapons by destroying the weapon itself>crew would seppuku out of shamegood times
I've played mostly ukf since i got the game. Usually against ai for a vit of practice, but also against friends who are somewhat better skilled than me. I've noticed that other factions, with exception of US I think since i played vs them once or twice and picked them the same amount of times, have some kind of spammable better than tier 1 infantry. Brits only have the assauly officer without doctrines, also you can recruit only one at a time.Are regular british riflemen supposed to pick uo slack with bren guns? That sounds nice but other factions can give sub automatic weapons to regular infatry as well, so what's the big deal?I mean I could blob regular infantry if I want to but they reach full potential onky ehen fighting from cover, which aint good for pushing.
>>1066926Infantry Sections are strong and very durable, stick them behind cover and they will do very well, remeber that they get extra cover bonuses, Brens are just a bonus.
>>1066763While I agree that stuka dive bomb has more synergy in finishing off tanks, giving panzer grens smoke and having the ability to remove cover/buildings can be interpreted as reinforcing infantry to better bolster the rest of the armor. Plus, dive bombs are something people have debated over for some time, as the audio cue does not make up for having zero flare warnings, thus making it up entirely to guessing where the drop would arrive. It wouldn't be so bad if the payload wasn't so deadly. You do make an interesting observation that some commanders are more a hodgepodge of abilities with no real synergy. I think the commander update was meant to tackle the problem. Some commanders did get a better deal out of the change, though I wish they didn't change partisans into what they are now.
>>1066926Infantry Section has some of the best received accuracy in the game, matching elites or surpassing them with veterancy (0.85 >>> 0.66). They are the equivalent of the most elite of mainline infantry, and are further improved with bolster, squad upgrades and LMG requisition. Sadly, this means UKF doesn't have cannon fodder units for you to use. The fact you perform best in cover also means the focus is more so on defensive. That said, you can still conduct pushes by making full use of available cover. Other than select maps, there is always something to stand and trade shots from, and you will typically always come out on top in those scenarios. If you're desperate for more cqc choices beyond assault officer (which is an overtuned unit IMO), you can always pick the lend lease tactics and bring assault sections instead. They start with brens and can be upgraded to use thommies, alongside having White phosphorous grenade that does not share cooldown with their regular ones. Downside is that they are quite costly to reinforce, and UKF is not a faction that can afford losses compared to other allies.
>>1066815Not sure how you could ever come to that conclusion given that grens typically are outmatched versus guards in both damage and durability. 6 man with better RA is one thing in terms of just being able to outlast trades, the AT-rifles can damage cover as well as threaten light armor play. The plink damage they do adds up very quickly and button vehicle means it's never a good idea to rush when guards are waiting. The DP-28 does not look all that much given its competition to LMG42, but that is only if you ignore the firing position bonus guards get. Decent players know exactly when to have it on and shred with the rate of fire boost. Assault guards aren't so bad, but hardly as reliable as rifle guards, especially when they risk much more losses as CQC units, while having none of the shock troops armor bonus.The elite rocket launchers are great, but hyper specializes an already expensive unit that can't quite kill tanks on their own and being far less threatening to infantry. Unless you blob them, your rocket volleys will only force a temporary retreat, rather than confirming kills.
>>1066953>>1066938Thanks for the info.So, their worst fear is being rushed and losing the cover defensive bonuses?
>>1066938>>1066953One of my friends uses the fact that infantry section riflemen are valuable and creates a sniper ASAP as wermacht. The fastest counter I have for those is that small transport vehicle chasing the snioer around. Does that vehicle have any special use after that? Would you build that vehicle if you are not threatened by snipers?
>>1057200He has 50 vision at vet 0, that's reason enough to use him. The abilities are also helpful sometimes.
>>1066998Building snipers against UKF can be a good pick if you feel confident about your own map awareness. The reason you build snipers early is because early UKF has practically zero counter other than hoping you make a mistake. They are forced to simply maneuver around the sniper or risk a good deal of manpower loss which is typically never worth it. Building a universal carrier or AEC to kill a sniper is possible, but wehr sniper has pretty solid RA and will likely survive every time if the player retreat early. You would have practically zero chance if the sniper is also covered by grenadiers that provide fausts. The real threat with doing a sniper build is being countersniped as brits can tech to tier 2 very quickly. That or they go commandos and ambush the sniper. The key to snipers is to have them rack up kills quick early game so as to bleed manpower, which is something the UKF struggles with.
I remember actually looking at the cover bonus of the infantry section and concluding that it's worthless (their rifles have a statline such that they practically don't get influenced by it). Can someone confirm that for me?
>>1066998Also, the Universal Carrier is hands down one of the cheesiest units you can wield as a UKF. It can't be bled as it is a vehicle, and the bren upgrade turns it into a dps machine. Even at max range, it can deal respectable damage. While it can't kill snipers, it can play keep away by threatening the same zone and forcing the sniper to play safe rather than aggressively try to drop infantry sections. The suppressive fire the bren carrier has also allows you to halt pushes at a whim, giving you time to adjust to surprise flanks. The wasp upgrade the UC has is also not bad, but is far more riskier to use as the range on it is quite short. It does do nicely versus structures, but you could use something else to deal with them. Get the bren upgrade instead. Cheaper and more reliable.
>>1067015I think gerry snipers can cost me at least two infantrymen before I can tech up.
>>1067018Yeah, a lot of the bonus got nerfed/removed. It was originally an improvement to reload and cooldown, but now I don't recall the exact bonus. That said, I do have recent tests done about three days ago by a separate community member on how much better Infantry Sections do in or out of cover. "Close range (centered at 10, varying between 5 and 15), time to annihilate a blob of 10 volksgrenadier squads for a single vet 3 IS modelBren in cover: 616sBren out of cover: 657s (6.7% worse)Enfield in cover: 839sEnfield out of cover: 896s (6.8% worse)Mid to long range (centered at 25, varying between 20 and 30), time to annihilate a blob of 10 volksgrenadier squads for a single vet 3 IS modelBren in cover: 543sBren out of cover: 592s (9% worse)Enfield in cover: 1011sEnfield out of cover: 1032s (2% worse)"
>>1067025The price you pay for one shot one kill at max range. The sniper more than pays for itself after dropping 13 models. Any extra drops and you're netting a profit. It takes no time at all.
>>1067018Nevermind. I'm mentally challenged. I actually misinterpreted the data. The way it actually works is that IS get 5% received accuracy bonus while IN cover. But when OUT of cover, they get a malus on their rifles, which causes them to do slightly less damage. Does that make sense?
>Trying to understand the spaghetti logic of how units work in Coh2 and locating obscure data be like
>>1067044Pretty much, thanks Lelic.
>>1067039Ah that's right, at some point some of their innate received accuracy was moved to cover only. Thanks for reminding.
So whats the basic gameplan with UK, is it just infantry sections > team weapons > tanks? Are emplacements just a meme against competent players? are the brit tanks any good?
So if i am absolute beginner to CoH what should I install, 1 or 2? Do i have to revert some version/patch or install some mods to get balanced game?
>>1067105It depends, you want multiplayer or singleplayer? Team games or 1v1? To put it short, if you want to play some very good singleplayer campaigns, get 1, if you want to get heavily into multiplayer, competitive or otherwise, get 2, both 1 and 2 have campaigns and a somewhat active multiplayer scene, but I'd say 1 has better campaigns, while 2 has a more active multiplayer fanbase.
>>1067105Id say play 1 for SP campaigns as tutorial, then shift to 2 for skirmish/multi. 2 got more expensive because of Sseth influence but 1 is still very cheap
>>1067095Depends on your build order, to be honest. UKF typically shift towards IS heavy starts into rushing an AEC for early AT before transitioning to your flavor of end game cheese. Most people try to get comets out.
>>1067021>Even at max range, it can deal respectable damageFun fact, its built in Bren has reversed damage curve like most infantry LMGs. Basically, it actually does more damage at long than up close.
>>1067095Emplacements are a meme, after they are spotted for the first time, they get killed by dirt cheap light mortars.
>>1066852>>1066969Playing by rankedfag meta "balance" is your mistake. Use reversal mods and play with proper original stats that weren't fucked up by brainless compfags.
>he's still coping
Is an MG team something that gets built in every natch? Are the pros of the MG team such that it's useful to have one regardless of circumstances?
>>1067338Pretty much yes. You can skip it in the opening to be more mobile during the inital capping phase but eventualy you will want to get one.
@1067329>modslmaoing hard @ u right now...
>>1067345>he doesn't play custom with buddiesYou are the one to be lmaod at.
>>1067345Sorry, I don't let virgins tell me how to enjoy vidya.
>>1067329>Play against braindead AI
>>1067415See >>1067381, even if you're a pvptard you still can avoid the "community blance" gayness. And RTS are an AI-based genre, multiplayer is the cancer that kills the genre.
>>1067440I'm not sure how multiplayer kills it.
>>1067381I do, just without mods.>>1067389Wizards are very good at games, though.>>1067454If anything that's what keepa their community alive, be it competitive or cooperative multiplayer, that guy is just weird.
>>1067454By turning them into clickfests or meta, infested with the worst kind of sweaty autists. There's a reason waacfags are hated, just look at the retarded patches in this game to get it.>>1067688I wouldn't call that existence "alive". It's more like a fate worse than death.
>>1067837Can you just join random pubs where people don't play that way? I mean, the number of noobs here is extremly low, but then again there aren't so many tourneyfags either. Surely, playing against humans produces situations you might not see playing against ai.
>>1067837So you only play offline only?
>>1067328So ironically, the only faction they have a chance against is brits since they have no mortar without doctrines?Now I have another question. The resupply track from the british tank hunters doctrine gives PIATs and vickers K. I expected it to be brens. How do vickers and bren guns compare?
>>1068332Bren are the traditional inverted dps lmg, where the dps is better the further the target is. Vickers is simillar to the US Bar as it performs better at close range. Sadly, this makes the Vickers a bad pick as Infantry Sections are better at range, but the vickers do very well with raid sections, which the have comparable dps model to US riflemen.
>>1068339Is investing a vickers into royal engie squad smart? I don't think they're exceptionally tough and that giving them fire power like that might be a waste unless it's extremely critical to fortify a point against rushes. I see they get a vickers if I go anvill, but that just seems like a bonus, does their received accuracy improve?
>>1068343Not worth it in most cases. Royal engies just don't have the durability to survive. The Vickers package used to be glod because you can give it to conscripts. Patched out now so it's very meh
>>1068332>the only faction they have a chance against is britsPretty much, anvil spec was a mistake. Why did they think it a good idea to build a whole army on gimmick, and then charge money for it?
>>1066258Ass Guards are good because you can equip them with Zooks, Inf Guards are pretty decent with their AT rifles can be good with DP-28 upgrade, Air Guards can be good with PPSH upgrade
Is ukf infantry section in trouble if low tier close range units like wermacht engirs decide to rush them?
>>1069523If you're behind cover, no, and even out of cover you'd have good chances of killing 1 or 2 models before they're close enough to do any significant damage, if you're going right around a corner and you stumble upon each other then you're most likely fucked.
>>1069967I'm thinking about this situation where you quickly end up in an unfavorable position. How fast do you have to order a retreat? Is the real question of do I stand to gain something by holding them off while losing men?
>>1070149The only way pioneers can even slightly threaten a section is if they're in heavy cover or outnumber the enemy and brits stand out in the open. Even yellow cover will make tommies melt any engi squad with the enhanced attack.
Want to have fun in a 4vs4 as a Wehrmacht player? Choose storm doctrine.>LeFH artillery howitzer (vital for dealing with team weapons and emplacements)>Stuka bombing run (great for taking out repairing tanks, enemy howitzers and even mobile artillery units)>Stuka smoke drop that also provides vision (great synergy with Stuka bombing run)>all your infantry can now sprint (great against snipers, to panzerfaust enemy vehicles or to chase down retreating units)>can upgrade all your infantry with camouflage (great against snipers and on MGs)>camouflaged panzergrenadiers with panzerschreck that can sprint are actually good
>>1070267Oh and I forgot the 5 man Jaeger Command Squad which can fire off a flare for sight, has access to a smoke grenade and a G43. It costs only 300 manpower and no muinitions to upgrade.
>>1070161It was a more general question. Let's say I fucked up somehow and I'm in an unquestionably unwinnable situation. Is buying time ever an option, or should I immediately order a retreat.
>>1070350>buying timenever worth it, you're bleeding MP and feeding exp to the opponent
>>1070350In my experience, the difference between veteran and newbie players is the complexity of the reasoning they make for retreating. As a rule of thumb, the most important thing to always consider is yay or nay on winning the engagement. Being able to immediately determine whether your odds are favorable is foundation to making other calls. The more obscure occasions are making bad engagements on purpose based on knowledge you obtained while playing your opponent. For example, let's say I am microing two separate engagements at the same time versus my opponent. I know for a fact that they don't have the micro to finely play out both sides. In that case, I may choose to take a few model losses and hit the retreat later just so I can trap their attention while I manoeuvre the side I prefer to win out on. I'm not that good at the game myself, but this is something I've been explained to before by top players of the coh2 ladders.
goddamn german coop missions are fucking insane with their lack of panzershrecks and no regular tanks only anti infantry tanks and no heavy vehicles against soviets that call their normal tanks and also get free reinforcement waves in the shape of KV1, how do you even win in general difficulty?
>>1070961>how to win coopObviously by spamming your elite Panzergrenadiers, which luckily come pre-equipped with powerful AT rifles.
>>1070961Strategic reserves. You get an even stronger AT Pz4, 6-man SMG units with grenade volley, and your engineers now can repair faster and throw bombs like penals. Oh, and you also get camouflaging APCs and in southern fronts you get an elite tiger.
>>1070961What coop missions? Threate of war missions?
>>1071203arent the AT rifles useless against the heavier soviet tanks?
>>1071887might do some damage if you can hit them from the rear
Quick one, if a transport vehicle, like the universal carrier by brits is under fire, can models inside die?
>>1072113i dont know
>>1072113Like losing crew? No. Losing any infantry inside? Also no.
>>1072113only if it gets destroyed while they are inside, but even then a few models will survive
>>1072113Yes, they can, damage is pretty much directional, you can see how units can die from a medium tank shot into the rear of a hafltrack here, the whole video has some other interesting things that are good to know about troop transports.https://youtu.be/Qaf5_GhKAdY?t=100
>>1063678Setup time, arc changes, suppression efficiency (make it have shittier supression closer to a maxim), vision changes, received accuracy changes etc.
>>1063723I'd say that OKW is easiest learning curve, but pros with Soviets (or American pathfinders) have highest potential
>>1066970British are like the Ally equivalent of Wehr. They like mid-long range engagement with green cover.Vs standard Wehr, they'll win in most circumstances vs Grens (until Gren lmg42+vet2 power spikes, but Brit has later game power spikes with brens+bolster 5-man upgrades) but Wehr has mg42 HMG to swing fights in their favour.OKW will try to blob you, and generally close the distance or attack from multiple angles. Important to focus fire on sturms, or on units that try to close distance while they're out of cover. Volks in green/heavy cover will generally beat Sections in brown/light cover, but it depends on model drops/vet/stg upgrades. Volks have fire nades to force you out of cover.
>>1070267For team games, I like commanders with Riegel mines (so fun baiting medium/heavys onto them as they chase my flamethrower halftrack)
>>1072743>American pathfinders>highest potentialwat
>>1071901like most of the missions feature mud or snow, so thats quite a stretch.