I just want a game with the sheer endless scope of Daggerfall with half-modern graphics, good gameplay and radiant quests.Is that too much to ask?
Asking for good gameplay in an open world game is itself a bit of a stretch.
>>2267790Good gameplay doesn't fit with either scope of Daggerfall or radiant quests
>>2267790Cataclysm DDA is for you then. Also, Darklands.
>>2267790Wayward Realms is sort of aiming for that. Comming out sometime next decade, I'd guess.
>>2267790There's Elona+ and frogcomposchengbandand C:DDA I guess
>>2268013>>2270307Even DFU looks better than CDDA
>people actually asking for radiant questswhat is wrong with you
>>2267790I dropped every procedurally-generated game I played. They were all very dull.
>>2267790what would you deem to be 'good combat' anon?
>>2270258>Comming outLol. Lmao
>>2267790>Is that too much to ask?Yes, it is.The modern game industry can't even wipe its own ass right, you think they can make something actually ambitious like that?Your only hope is a team of dedicated indie devs doing it for you. Alternatively, doing it yourself.
>>2267790Outer Wilds. Also, Daggerfall's scope doesn't matter when its depth is shallower than my grandma's piss on the floor.
>>2267790Julian LeFay and other old DF developers are making a DF-Like, forgot the name though
>>2273817as long as you're not talking about OuterWorlds, fuck that game; I've not played Daggerfall, but OuterWorlds is a fucking joke.
>>2267790Why do you like radiant quests?
>>2274699Who said anything about Outer Worlds? That one is peak tranny retardation. Obsidian should be purged after they made that ugly shit game.
>>2274676You mean "The Wayward Realms"? I'm not really expecting much, but I'm carefully optimistic maybe they will do something good. So far, all they have to show for it is a teaser which doesn't show us much outside of Shrek and Donkey:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8HWsSEnGZhg