Which franchise has better waifumon designs?
Pokemon "waifumons" aren't humanoid enough for me to want to fuck
>>45923851Pokemon. Simplicity is key.
>>45923921>I like fucking animalsNice.
>>45923851They’re apples and orangesThe more human-looking pokemon are nothing like digimon’s(people in cosplay)
>>45923947Since when are fruits and guardian angels animals?
>>45923947>You appreciate the design so you want to fuck a pokemonSure, pal.
>>45923851Wanting to fuck those Digimon makes you a normalfag.
>>45923851Obviously Digimon, because they look like literal human women.
>>45923963Right here.Inb4>B-But it says CREATURESSame thing.
>>45923971>Thread is clearly asking about which franchise has the more fuckable monstersCool.
>>45924008>thread literally asks "which franchise has better waifumon DESIGNS?"Nice
>>45923851digimon because they look and act like actual women, and also aren't captured in balls against their will
>>45924031>Fapbait monsters aren't DESIGNED with being fuckable in mindSure.
>>45924046>the only measure of good DESIGN is how fuckable they areOkay
>>45924061>WAIFUmons aren't for blatant sexualizationRight.
>>45923963The game treats them like animals, sweetie. Not whatever you just wrote lmao. You literally play with them with a fuckign cat toy lmao
>>45924071>WAIFUmons aren't just any mon that slightly resembles a woman in DESIGNUnderstandable
>>45924071>I would never fuck my Waifu!LAIR!
>>45924087>Women have more purpose beyond providing sexIf you say so.
>>45924095>Women have a purposeWhatever you say
>>45924040I don't think Pokemon are captured against their will but I remember Digimon are more like actual people than Pokemon. But a magical pet will always be better than a dear magical friend
>>45924119but neither one of them is magical. One is a wild animal that you can stuff into a ball through TECHNOLOGY and the other is literal computer data.
>>45923851Also I prefer Pokemon because it has more variation. The examples you just listed looks straight up cosplay tier.
>>45923864How did anon do it. One post in and already /thread
>>45923851Digimon. Look like humans
What is a waifu-mon, anyway? Let’s break it down>waifuThe word implies it’s someone you would wife, or fuck, in this case probably fuck without being hehe ironic>monShort for monster, it describes a creature that is scary and usually large or strange, but in this case we will use the textbook definition loosely, and say that in general it describes an entity that represents a usually inhuman/animal/object concept given personifying features ranging from some to a lot and is in some way alive or has tendencies of living thingsSo, you can see how humanity is a bit of an issue already. Does a Pokémon inherently have less quality if it strays from the monster aspect and closes in on the human aspect? Is a digimon any less a digital monster if it isn’t directly designed to be a monster or creature?The short answer is, Pokémon does it better.The long answer, Digimon waifumons are only mostly waifu and very little monster, while their regular digimon are much more monstrous and inhuman than Pokémon on average are. A waifumon should be equal parts fuckable and monstrous, and digimon fails to do both at once.
>>45924173okay but have you seen angewomon fanart
>>45923987>haha le ayy lmao referencezoinks
>>45923963While there's no animals in Pokemon, I think that anon meant in how Pokemon are portrayed. A gardevoir isn't a guardian angel in practice. Maybe in design but it's not like it's a creature that comes down from heaven to protect little timmy. It's a creature that lives in the wild just like a Pikachu does and it has fantastical properties like any other pokemon. In games it's basically a creature you go capture in the wild to raise, breed and do battle with and it's essentially a subservient creature to it's master. It's these types of portrayals that sometimes makes people connect them to animals even thought they don't exist in Pokemon since the Pokemon take that role. I don't know about digimon but I remember they could talk, they had their own architecture, civilizations, and stuff. While Pokemon are portrayed as wild creatures digimon act and some even look very people like from what I can remember.
>>45924173>Digimon fails to do both at once.LadyDevimon? Sakuyamon? Taomon? Rosemon? Lilimon? Garudamon? Lekismon? Crescemon? Minervamon? Pokemon are literal animals. Creatures that live in a ecosystem outside of humanity. They only get the word 'monster' because the humans do not fully understand them after 8 gens. Keep fucking animals, I will stick to fucking imaginary 1s and 0s you degenerate.
>>45924211btfo'd too hard.
>>45924211I don't get it
>>45923867*aren't feral enough
>>45924505What does feral mean
Any roms that focus on waifumons?fakemons are fine too
>>45923851Digimon has Lilymon, so that.
>>45923851>Ranamon>Lilithmon>Rosemon and Lillymon>BelleStarmonDigichads can‘t stop winning
>>45923851Digimon hands down
>>45924257nearly all of those examples are just cosplay or furries
Depends on what you want out of your waifu, I guess. Rosemon and Angewomon are literally just humans in costumes though. In Pokemon you're still waifuing a monster.
>>45924265needs fart edit
>>45923867I used to say that and now I want to fuck Serperior.
>>45923851I always hated the Digimon that were basically humans with covered eyes, especially later on when you find out that some of those can take those visors and masks off and they have normal human faces and eyes under there.
>>45926508Those are the best kind you freak
>>45926508I think the rare humanoid digimon is fine, as long as the eyes are covered or there's at least 1 monsterous element.the problem is there's way tooi many now and a bunch don't do thoselike petermon is just a dude
>>45923851I wouldn't even consider those digimon to be monsters those are just women cosplaying
>>45927026His name is literally peter. It makes sense
>>45923851Pokémon doesn't have Sakuyamon, soAlso this >>45923864
>>45927027This. I may hate cinderace for being a twink in a bunny costume but even he doesn't come close to some of these digimon
>>45923851>waifumon>not even monsterscringe desu senpai
>>45923851Pokemon, you can have images of waifumon (On-model) in your stuff and in the eyes of normal people you will have no major problem of being criticized for being childish, even some girls find them cute, instead Digiwaifus is practically a rapist statement.
>>45924173But anon, humans are the real monsters.
>>45924173In some official artworks you can see the night sky if you open Angewomon's zippers. Don't let her looks fool you, she is a monster and more alien than most pokémon by her sheer "biology".
>>45928411Based. People are too quick to judge solely on looks alone instead of seeing the wider picture.
>>45925057And furries don't count as monsters because...? Also, see >>45928411. Those only look like humans.
>>45923963>n-no fucking vegetables is totally less fuck up than fucking dogsyou’re too far gone to be save
>>45923851Pokemon does most monster designs better because there's more internal logic involved. The through-line from Ralts to Gardevoir is a lot clearer than the through-line from Gatomon to Angewomon. This is definitely intentional, the gaps between digivolutions are supposed to be as wide as they are. It just feels more satisfying seeing a Pokemon evolve from stage to stage and retain core elements from its base form and not randomly turn into a completely different creature. The Digimon that just look like humans in costumes, right down to having normal human skin tones, are the worst examples of this. It's not a matter of certain designs being better or worse, Digmon's design philosophy is just faster and looser than Pokemon's.
>>45923990There is also human characters in Digimon.
>>45928451because the furry im talking about's head is literally just generic mascot wolf head. its not terribly attractive either. i dont particularly care if they totally have otherworldly secrets, they still look like cosplayers that could take off their outfit to reveal a normal personalso why the fuck hasn't renamon been mentioned in this thread that's like, THE waifumon of digimon
>>45928698>digimon are worse because you have to consider the entire lineBy that logic pokémon are worse if you prefer variety. With a digimon you can have all sorts of waifus through their branching evolutions/devolutions, even turn them into husbandos. Also, any "problem" in a digimon's design can be solved by mods.
>>45928734>the furry im talking about's head is literally just generic mascot wolf head. its not terribly attractive eitherWho is it? Post her.
>>45927198>WAIFUmon>posts the gayest boy next to Wormmon
>>45928826Sure, there's definitely more variety when it comes to Digimon. Like you said, it comes down to preference. Pokemon are designed to be more like actual creatures, they can't just transform randomly. It's a more grounded series, with more of a focus on permanent growth than a variety of transformations.