This thread is for the discussion of (bitching and moaning) of Battlefield-type games such as>Battlebit Remastered>Polygon>Battlefield 5>Battlefield 1>Battlefield 1>Battlefield 2042planetmans already have their own thread
why did they even call them LMGs in BFV?
>>597512Battlefield V was the last one I played. The rest are shit are after that.
>>597512the last playable battlefield was battlefield 1 with operations modei dont care for battlefield games in modern settings because its just bing bing wahoo equivalent in equipment
>>598416I know you can still pretty easily find BF5 matcheshow is BF1?is there "cross play" between Origin and Steam?
so it's either buy it full price for 40 on steamget it through XBox gamepass (EA play is included in the dumbass goypass and BF1 is included in EA play)buy an origin keyor wait for a sale that might never come
>>598536there is no "cross play between origin and steam"if you buy an EA game through steam, you still have to have origin open to play it, because it redirects you to origin. i am not a fan of all these companies wanting to keep their failed launchers alive (uplay, origin, epic games launcher, etc.)
>>598598it goes on sale all the time down to 10 or less dollarsthe only problem is that you are going to be like me and miss the free full shortcuts for every class they gave away back in september
>>598605it seemed like they were on verge of going away and then MS comes along with their gamepass which is the first thing to actually pose a good enough incentive to be an ongoing competitor to steamand now you have shit like EA baking itself into gamepass
>>598608i honestly think microsoft is the only company who hasnt put up an embarrassing effort in an attempt to make a competitor to steam. microsoft did one thing very well that the other companies didnt - they didnt pull this retarded "exclusive to my company's launcher!" for their games. this prevented the usual huge wave of backlash, which allowed a lot of people to actually consider what they had to offer.
>load up quickplay in BF1>wait 5 minutes to be placed in empty lobbythat's really odd it says there's like 4,000 people on steam and that's not even counting people who have it on origin and not on steam
>>597625why did they call them MMGs
>>598765I guess to distinguish them as bipod-onlythey certainly don't actually hit any harderOnly a few of them shoot significantly faster
>>598773with the ROF specialization all of them except the M1919A6 shoot faster than the fastest firing LMG (BAR M1918A2)still doesn't make them that useful except to annoy people on Operation Underground because of the delay between the bipod being deployed and being able to ADS
>>598749Isn’t it all on origin though? So it should be more than that 4K on steam. Maybe the problem is just that you’re not playing the right battlefield. 2042 is pretty fun and I still play it but 5 is leagues better in many ways. Why anybody still plays bf1, arguably the worst game in the series, is beyond me.
>>598749the server browser is the way to go for finding populated games
>>598799use www.battlefield.agency for accurate playercounts (they have bots that scour the server list player counts and aggregate them for the most accurate number of players - no1 idling in menu is counted, both steam and origin copies are counted).
>>598932wtf this is really neatthank you
Cado on the 'log
>>598773The MMG designation only refers to the weight of the weapon, not caliber.Pretty sure the BAR and the M1919 fire the same caliber but the BAR is an LMG because you can carry it around more easily than a M1919.There's HMGs in the game too but they're all stationary or mounted to vehicles.
>>598799its like every zoomer faggot on this board was too young to remember the backlash behind bf5 and any reason why some of us prefer bf1. me, i play bf1 because i like the operations mode. i like the operations mode because its the closest thing to red orchestra 2's multiplayer that i can find that isn't dead, and im having to improvise because the faggots at tripwire keep neglecting the core audience that got them to where they are like many other studios (total war being another prime example of this)
>>599709oh mymmmmmmmm ooooh yeahdo I smellthe stenchthe sweet stinkof a salty hist fag
if you play assault you have useless empty balls and Jesus doesn't love you
After many years of waiting Forgotten Hope 2 is getting the French https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmzNUkLMjtI
>>598749Late reply but FYI use server browser. The matchmaking is fucked. It always puts you in lobbies with 300 ping or lobbies that are empty. These are just some I favourited for quick games but there's a shitload of full servers. BF1 is still very popular. And for good reason. It's fun as fuck.
I'm playing Bad Company 2 on PS3 right now :)
>>598917This. I've been using server browser all the time. Accidentally searched quick match which was awful. I play US servers mostly but I'll occasionally join Euros and the connection ain't too bad
>can't kill planes because AA sucks ass>can't take a plane because they are all in use>can't do shit with a plane because they are level 0>can't get xp points because can't do shit>get instantly destroyed by AA or high level planes anyways
>>598749matchmaking was always super fucked, use the browser
>>597512Fuck you fag for including 42 and not 4
bf3 is best battlefield
>>613390That may be true but good fucking luck playing itI hate EA so much>Team Fortress 2 - 2007 and still inexplicably alive despite an active effort to make it unplayable >Battlefield 3 - 2011 and you'd be lucky to play with even one other person todaynot fair
>>613417One big difference is that there hasn't been a TF3, a sequel sucks in the playerbases of the previous editions.
>>598598I got it for two bucks at a game store near me just go outside
>>603031I'm playing bad company on the Xbox 360 right now
>>620887how are you liking automatic weapons being useless?
>>620899I'm playing the story mode because it's my favorite
>>620900you smell very CLEAN
>>620683A lot of the stuff they said here is pretty good actually and does give a bit of hope.Still though it'll be to little to late and most will jump over to MW2 when it comes out.
I still play bf4. Although aa is op af, I still rape noobs on my jet
Bump for Build and Shoot.
>>621109>A lot of the stuff they said here is pretty good actually>1 new map in "season 1">1 new specialist that nobody wants>animation "improvements" from BF4>Kaleidoscope re work in August>Renewal update in Season 2 lulz>Specialist "look & feel" update that nobody wants Dice are fucking clowns and every update they give us on this game is them squirting us in the face with a seltzer bottle
>>621469you deserve all the shit you get for buying that piece of garbage desuthe writing was on the wall and you ignored it
>>621469They're fixing shit that sucked how is that bad?Again is I said its to little to late. >Specialist "look & feel" update that nobody wantsEveryone wants this. Right now they sound stupid and are out of place. Or are you just one of the retards that think they'll axe specialists entirely?
>>621919Seeing this thread from the 1st page on /vm/ - I won't touch another battlefield game if they keep pushing specialists. They're a blight on the genre
>>621964I don't like specialists either I'm just saying they aren't going to remove them entirely from 2042.
How come BFV has such a wide variety of tanks and airplanes, yet most of the maps are amerilards and slopes?
>>621919>They're fixing shit that sucked how is that bad?It's bad cuz it should've been done months ago and there's gonna be even more down time between fixes.What's truly bad about the specialist is how both teams have access to the same motherfuckers. Why didn't they go for having a "Russian" counterparts is beyond me.
>not playing ravenfield
>>624671Not going to deny that at all. Its embarrassing to that its taken so long to get the game into a maybe season 1 launch state and even then its got a long way to go from there.Even CoD lately has had faction specific characters so it was pretty embarrassing they didn't do it. I imagine it'd been to challenging to think of 10 brand new characters that also have mirrored abilities. So stupid how their obsession with BR led them to believe specialists where actually a good idea.
>>621919>>622056>They're fixing shit that sucked>are you just one of the retards that think they'll axe specialists entirely>they aren't going to remove them entirelySo they're supposedly fixing shit, but he's stupid for thinking they will fix shit and also they aren't going to fix shit? I at least hope you're getting paid for this
>>626792He's stupid for thinking that they're going to change specialists after they've said time and time again, even inside the very video in question, that they are here to stay whether we like them or not.People whining that specialists are the sole bad thing about the game are retarded as there is SO much other stuff that's terrible too.
Overwatch was a mistake
>>599709at least the total war devs still make games...
>>627420total war in name only
>>627814>>53854583ngl I've grown rather fond of the weird Frankenstein RPG 4X game that it has become>THE NATION CALLSvery funthree kingdoms will always hold a special place in my heart but I genuinely enjoy total soihammer
>Battlefield 4 basically unplayable because there's hackers everywhere>Not even subtle hackers, just some fag sitting in the uncap killing everyone with perfectly accurate infinite range TV missiles>Can't play BF3 because it's ded>Can't play BF5 because it's BF5>BF1 has barely any mapsHow the fuck is it that this genre of games has gone to such absolute shit?
>>628104V and 2042's launch ruined a lot of folks to the point where they are actively wanting the franchise to die off.>mfw former DICE dev's make a bf inspired game
>>628113>battlefield inspired gamesI really am not a fan of the art style but keep your eyes on battlebit remasteredWe're all currently waiting around for it to have another round of beta public tests
>>628056i think the idea is great, but combat has been royally fucked in every game after fall of the samurai. i'd love to see a 30 years war game with the same kind of map, and shogun 2's combat. sadly i know it would just become crossbow bolts retextured to look like musket shots (and with almost the same exact firing arcs), and the shitty combat where most units are completely irrelevant. what soihammer players dont understand is that cheap shitty units could be relevant when fielded correctly instead of just being some waste of resources that the enemy chews through at a 10:1 kill death ratio while simultaneously having damn near no contribution to battles
>>628537BUT DUDE YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND THE ELVES ARE LIKE 7000 MORBILLION YEARS OLDTHERES NO WAY EVEN 100 ORK BOYS COULD HOPE TO TAKE DOWN AN ELF!!!!
I'm that guy that sits on the final capture point with an MMG that you keep headshotting, but I keep returning to the exact same spot.ask me anything
>>628632How did you get so based?
>>628104It's not the genre that is fucked it's the brand. The field is open for a clone and a few are starting to appear. None take the spotlight yet, they are either spoofs or early access vaporware>>628632Whats the best tool for the job
>>628637I can tell you that the best MMG for MMG purposes is the 1922not him btwbut I have played dozens of hours with all the MMGsbasically>250 rounds>fantastic recoil for the firerate>chrome lining (any mmg without this is automatically complete garbage)best MMG
>>628636I played Tachanka in R6S>>628637browning is the most satisfying
>>628638Oh and one more detail I forgot about the 1922 is that it strangely has the unique quirk (probably a bug) where its short reload occurs after emptying the entire belt and the long reload occurs when you try to reload before finishing the beltbasically 1922 encourages SUPPRESSING FIRE by rewarding using your entire fucking belt before reloading
After playing BF5 for quite a bit I can see why it's inferior to BF1. It panders too much to the sweaty competitive types at the expense of the casual players that make up the majority of the playerbase, Behemoths and doritos are part of the reason BF1 is fun for casual players. Also>Wasted valuable development resources on putting women into the game when they could have made other stuff instead which actually made a difference to gameplay>Sniper aim isn't affected by suppression or being hit by bullets which is a bad design decision>Spotting is absolute shit, as scout you have to use the eyeglass and it only lasts for a few seconds so you have to constantly pop your head up
>>629859>spotting blah blah blah only works blah blahUNLESS YOU'RE A SUPPORT CHADWOO WOO WOO CHAD TRAIN IS LEAVING THE STATIONOOOOH AND WHAT'S HE PULLING BEHIND HIMOH MAN WHAT CARGO DOES HE HAVE THERE>suppressing enemies spots themOOOOH YEAH LAD I DO BELIEVE I'M SUPPORTIN MY TEAMTHE ENEMY CANT LEAVE COVERMY TEAM CAN SEE WHERE THEY AREEVEN IF THEY TRIED TO BE CHEAKY AND PATIENT AND WAIT FOR THE TORRENT TO STOP TO PEAK MY SNIPER BUDDY IS JUST GONNA PEAL YOUR HEAD IMMEDIATELY ANYWAYBECAUSE YOU'RE FUCKIN SUPPRESSED AND SPOTTED KIDDOAWWWOOOOOGA>throws an ammo box to a group of infants playing assault>they gather around me to obtain more rockets to snipe tanks withWITHOUT SUPPORTYOU CANNOT WIN250 ROUNDS OF PAIIIIIIN OH YEAH BROTHERYOU'RE GOIN NOWHERE YOU'RE CLUTCHING YOU'RE SHIT FILLED BRITCHES IN TERROR WHILE I MELT THE CONCRETE YOUR HIDIN BEHIND
>>628638m1922 takes forever to reload i hate it, especially since empty reload is faster
>>629859>It panders too much to the sweaty competitive typesand BF1 panders too much, WAY too much, to the retarded idiot casualfag that doesn't know WTF a Battlefield game is
>>630029be more careful when reloading thenreloading an MMG should be a rare thing that you only do once every 30 or so seconds topsalso the 1922 has the best iron sights of all MMGs
>>607875aa is incredibly op u are just brain dead
>>630302Not at all. There are so many shitty shooters out there that cater to sweats so BF1 was fantastic and regarded as one of the best BF games.
>>630529>BF1 was fantastic and regarded as one of the best BF gamesBy CoDfags, people that have never played a prior BF game, and people who play it as their first FPS ever.Everyone else knows BF1 is a dogshit turd that's only bested by 2042 in how awful it is.
>>630593Anon is right. This game killed my interest in this series. It fucking blew.
Aaah... feels good to be a console player. No cheaters... less sweats... no getting ddosed or anything like that. Just me and my buddies pubstomping. PCtards insist on buying 2000$ rigs to play the newest games, but then those newest games turn out to be BFV or 2042. My PS3 and BF3 copy still work great to this day
>>631445It's all fun and games until EA shut down the servers of BF3 on PS3 and you'll never be able to play it again, while on PC (thanks to custom clients) you will ALWAYS be able to play the game.
>>631463>what is psone.online
>>631471>supports like 5 games
>>631463>custom downloaded client>the only people who know about it are the hardcore fans>the only people who will actually download it are the people with the tech expertise to get it running>the only people who will actually play it are the no life sweats>that leaves about 7 people in NA and 20 in EU... on weekendsYeah no thanks
>>631555>the only people who will care about playing the game when it shuts down are the hardcore fans of the gameNo shit? Why are you getting pissed at people who are better than you and like the game more than you? Go play something else if that triggers you.
>>631445>no cheatsYeah right - most of the "good" players on console BF games are using chronus devices.
>>630593>>630665You're probably the sweats that enjoy BFV because it doesn't cater to casuals.
Sisters!Season 1 launch is around the corner!Are we finally going home once and for all?
Why do fags like BF1? The gunplay is shit and the map design is cod levels of atrocious with then being 3 lanish and the desert maps usually leads to snipers camping because they're all open with like 2 houses.Not to mention it's a ww1 game and bolt action rifles are exclusively locked to recon and even if you use a scopeless rifle they have this gay mechanic to prevent you from noscoping people where snipers have a damage ramp up then drop off except it's also on the unscoped bolt action rifles so they're entirely useless.After all the updates BFV is unironically the best battlefield game to be released after BF4.
>>631665Are they really that different?Am I just a smooth brained retard or at the end of the day is a BF game a just another BF game. Like the overall gameplay feel is pretty damn similar to me in the end that I don't get how people can so deeply hate one over the other once they're in there completed state.
Zero brain power: being a vehicle sweat.Low brain power: Getting off 1-2 shots on a vehicle, then wait for it to come back because it ran away and is hiding behind a hill until the auto repair finishesHigh brain power: support, 2 engis and a jeep. Run around the map and be a mobile destruction machine, sniping helis, APCs, and tanks across the map with MLG SRAW snipesAscended: slambiking/jihadi jeep
>>631665Did you even play the game ? The only part where i might agree is the cod style gunplay, but i'd take that over the mess that is the gunplay of the other two>mapshonnestly there are some gems out there, and its not like the recent games don't also have memeworthy maps>that entire rant about snipersis all wrong
>>631898>zero hourwait a second
>>631898More like "Zero Content"
>>631665>After all the updates BFV is unironically the best battlefield game to be released after BF4.This is correct.
Even if they support it for like 5 yearsIf it still has the stupid specialist system then it'll be garbage no matter what they do
>>633056they're going to drop it after 4 "seasons"
>>633057Hahaha oh my God the game will be long long long long dead by then holy shit it's barely alive right now what the hell are they thinking hahaha what
>>633057oh you meant drop the game not drop the specialist system
I WANT IT BACK BROS
How is the portal thing on 2042? Since it shouldn't have a lot of the bad things, is it as bad as the regular modes?
>>636486it's a poor imitation of the games it is trying to replicate and there are only 6 maps (2 for each game)just play the real 1942, bad company 2, or 3
>>631445yeah it feels good
>>629867hell yeah support is the best
I am sick and tired of being so good (with tanks) at bf5. I can rack up 20-30 kills in mere minutes (if i'm in a tank) and often end up with the highest KDR and kills (with vehicles). I have every class (of tank) maxed out and optimized loadouts for all situations (on tank enabled maps). But if I step out of my comfort zone (a tank seat) for fun others take my spot and perform poorly, to a point it's detrimental to our team. They'll get instantly ambushed (by bazooka assault troopers) or just stand at the back of the map trying to snipe only to get countersniped (by an enemy tank). So in the end I'm burdened with carrying the team (with passenger seats), breaking into capture points tanking damage (lol) and destroying enemy vehicles. This curse of mine is making me lose interest in the game.
>>637647i love the puma with the 50mm cannon and ap rounds, easy to hunt medium and even heavy tanks with it
>>637746Historical accuracy is not a good enough reason to make the autocannon the starter weapon, I had to grind roadkills and backcaps to get the cannon and start playing it the right way
>>638556yeah that was a dumb ideabut that's what happens when you include unlocks in games
Will I regret purchasing STAR WARS™ Battlefront™ II while it is on sale for $8?I understand there is no more support and it only shows an average of 1.5k active players on Steam charts.
>>640160It's fun enough, if you like onionwars go for it. As you might expect it's a lot of grinding required to get to a fair level of play, but it's doable specially if you go for the coop mode. The end of support means there's no more pay to win, but last I heard of it the servers were fucked, it's worth checking the latest reviews. The number of players might be greater than what steam charts says since it was free on epin a year ago.
>want to play bf3 again but battlelog is fucked and the two oceania servers are empty
I keep having dreams of playing a good modern battlefield game. Instead I wake up and suffer the pacific maps in bf5
>>641578soloman islands is okrest are meh, with wake in particular being trash (but that's par for the course, since the only time it was good was in 1942)
>>597512I've just been playing all of them recently because they're on gamepass.Is it me or is BR mode in V just dead. I generally have a easier time finding matches BF1 actually.
>>644012Firestorm has been dead since it launched, no one ever cared about it.
>>644021That's a shame, but this is my first time playing Battefield games and they're actually really fun. At least the multiplayer, the campaigns don't seem as fun.
I want a sequel but with less flashy melee, less archers and magic being restricted to select heroes.
>>644819>LOTR battlefield gameI'd play itBattlefield: The Third Age
>>644907More like battlefront>horde of regular guys, swordsmen, pikemen, etc>some elite reinforcements like archers or trolls>two heroes like gandalf and aragorn vs the witch king and saruman Although I'd rather have it use Chivalry 2 fighting system or ever For Honor and keep it to 4v4 hero combat with minions.
>>644907>recon elves can spot beyond the horizon>using bombs to fling oliphaunts>fellbeast riders just farming forever>operation metro in moria
>>644819That would be cool which is exactly why it would never happen.
>>644819That or Warhammer fantasy, plenty of heroes, magic and monsters.
>>645409>>645067>WHF For HonorI'd never play any other game ever again>slayer>he plays like the spiteful offspring of Shugoki and Berserker>ironbreaker>slow immovable fortress>have a trollhammer torpedo as a T3 or T4 featit will never exist though
Will 2042 go to the gamepass or will it become f2p first? And will it happen before it's declared dead?