[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vm/ - Video Games/Multiplayer

[Advertise on 4chan]

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • There are 54 posters in this thread.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Self-serve ads are available again! Check out our new advertising page here.


[Advertise on 4chan]


BAD
>>
>>165744
Modern Warfare year 2 lets fucking go
>>
Agreed. I can't wait for infinity ward to destroy the warzone cashcow.
>>
>>165744
Haven't gotten it yet, red pill me
>>
why dont they just name it call of duty cold war?
>>
>>165744
should i get it on pc or xbone
>>
>>166076
It's good. Better than MW by a lot despite what fans will say.
>>
>>166076
it's a downgrade in basically every department. graphics, animations, sounds, gameplay. it sucks big dicks
>>
>>166076
Sledgehammer Games is an incompetent dev who can't make a COD game to save their life. Treyarch got all the broken pieces along with Raven and were given 1 year to redevelop Sledgehammer shit game into something that could be shipped.

The game is missing a shit load of polish and others things featured in MW2019 while adding a few new things.
>>
>>166076
The story is great, I dont play enough Zombies to judge if its good or not but i had fun with it so far and the multiplayer lacks content. However, I enjoy the multiplayer too even though it lacks content, while it doesnt have the same level of animations of MW the gameplay loop is definetly better and they have improved the connections and feel of the game a lot since the beta.
>>
It feels like old CoD. MW2019 is a much larger game with bigger maps and player counts. CW feels like classic CoD with smaller maps and more support class features. Using the SAM feels like a godsend.
>>
I'm enjoying it more than I did MW, it doesn't have the same level of polish and gunporn but the gameplay is simple and efficient.
With more content this could turn out to be one of the best ones, especially after two shitty black ops.
>>
>>166088
Runs so fucking bad on xbone, get like sub 60 FPS at normal fov
>>
I’m getting 30fps in zombies on all low settings bros, I have a rx580 and Ryzen 5 2600 what do I do
>>
Does it still have that janky mounting or do we have proper peeking now?
>>
>>166337
Maps are better than in MW that's for sure
>>
>>167202
That's what you get for buying shit components
>>
>>167292
Or you know...the game is unoptimised
>>
Mw3 is more fun
>>
why do people cope by saying Modern warfare 2019 is bad while they act like cold war is better
>>
I prefer it to MW so far myself
>>
>>165744
The only thing I have to say about it is

STOP BUYING GAMES THAT COME OUT YEARLY ASSHOLES.

Its the same for Pokemon. A game comes out every 1-2 years and people say the same shit about it. "Its too samey" "its boring" "nothing good about it" "BAD"

Well no shit sherlock, why would a gaming company even give a fuck about adding new things, or even fun things for that matter, if they knew that if they peddled shit to you you'd still buy it.

Vote with your wallet mates.
>>
>>165744
The only CoD I've ever played was the newest MW, what's the appeal? Maybe I'm too stuck in arena shooters but it seems like the majority of deaths in the game just come randomly from nowhere and it's really just a game of "I saw you first now you die"
>>
>>167288
They removed it completely
>>167488
I do not understand the appeal either of being seen first then you die, it only makes sense in warzone and even then you can still escape and turn the battle
>>
>>167453
It ain’t wise to ask some random fucko on the internet to not be retarded, you know.
>>
>>167124
<60 >30 FPS isn’t the end of the world, you spoiled brat.
>>
>>166418
>Sledgehammer Games is an incompetent dev who can't make a COD game to save their life
This, I understand why they need a third dev but Im sure they could find someone better than Sledgehammer
>>
File: 1605577566744.jpg (47 KB, 1280x720)
47 KB
47 KB JPG
>>167512
>FPS isn’t the end of the world, you spoiled brat.
What a fucking casual, but then again it is a COD thread.
>>
i really dont want to buy it. All my friends bought it and refuse to acknowledge that it is worse than mw. Should I cave in and get it? Or is this a game everyone will stop playing in two weeks?
>>
>>165744
COD shooterman has been terrible ever since the first release of modern warfare.
>>
>>167684
I don't think anyone is going to stop playing my dude
>>
Campaign was decent. Multiplayer is trash, graphics are trash and the maps are trash
>>
File: tiresome.jpg (81 KB, 866x600)
81 KB
81 KB JPG
>zombies, the only gamemode still fun in COD, is just another fucking remaster of nacht der untoten
>>
>>167644
>Rankedfag
>>
>>166076
Game released with only 3 multiplayer maps
>>
File: 1600556489573.png (133 KB, 376x444)
133 KB
133 KB PNG
>>168770
>>167512
>inconsistent, choppy performance is perfectly fine
>>
>>167124
I'm on xbone and the cutscenes are absolute horseshit because they play at about 4fps as the audio overlays it and you sit in silence watching a slow motion cutscene waiting for it to end, I cannot believe how this shit got past development
>>
At the part where you get to customize, it said my real name was inappropriate. Fuck that noise.
>>
>>168852
Yes.
>>
>>168839
you're shitting me
>>
>>168906

?
>>
File: Is The Oats Meal.png (856 KB, 1920x1080)
856 KB
856 KB PNG
>>165744
>>
Is MW2019 even any good? Didn't like the beta on first impressions, and I'm not a fan of battle royales so I didn't bother with Warzone. How does it compare to the other games?
>>
I like it.
It feels nice, the graphics are fine, it doesn't run terribly (but worse than MW), the gunplay is good enough, I've been enjoying it. Fireteams is a good mode that needs more attention.
Or, maybe I'm just desperate for something to replace the gaping void DICE left me with when they went full retard with bfv.
>>
>>168918
Did I stutter?
>>
>>168945
graphics, engine revamp and movement is great, many of the MP maps (excepting remastered ones from previous titles) are terrible though
campaign is kinda fun
spec ops is a waste of time
not as fun as the previous pinnacles in the series but was enough to bring me back to the series after not playing for several years
if you're interesed in buying it i would just wait for it to inevitably go on sale now that shit ops fag war is out
>>
It feels more like the old Call of Duty games and I think that's why I'm doing a lot better than I was with MW.
>>
>>167202
i have an rx580 and ryzen 5 3600 and get 100+ frames. upgrade your cpu bro
>>
>>170009
This lol my RX480/4gb with i5-7600k + only 8gb of ram gets better fps than him
>>
>>165744
I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.
>>
>>166076
Graphics are bad even on PS5, the animations are a downgrade from MW, ton of balance issues and fixes that need to be done, lackluster customization for your weapon (stickers,accessories,etc). Zombies is fun as hell, the flow of MP feels great,and haven't played campaign yet. Multiplayer feels like a beta that they decided to unlock all the features for.
>>
>>166076
campaign and zombies are amazing. multiplayer is complete horseshit with sbmm. am already max level with 30 mins in the shitty multiplayer because the zombies are so good
>>
>>166083
Because treyarch took over the production halfway through, it’s actually a sledgehammer game, now you know why it sucks
>>
>>166418
I have good news, sledghammer cocreator michael condrey has been in charge of activision as a whole for almost over a year
>>
>>167689
Disagree, no one hated cod the slightest until sledgehammer got involved, thats why mw3 was hated, but once sledghammer released their first standalone title aw the era of shitty cods began, they tried to redeem themselves with ww2 but we needed more than just boots on the ground
>>
And now time for the ultimate rant that will ensure you dont waste your $, starting with
>Campaign:
On the rails, feels linear compared to bo2, puzzles are stupid, story shoehorned in bo characters for fan service cuz this is actually a sledgehammer game, also too short, but definitely better than mw4.
>Multiplayer:
Broken aim assist, only 8 maps and are all three lane formulaic, terrible matchmaking, terrible weapon balance, censor glitches, dirty bomb was great idea that failed miserably after full release. How is this a finished product?
>Zombies:
Where the fuck are the fun and memorable characters? Is Richtoffen too offensive for 2020 or something? Only fun for new players, too easy, yet i die to the dumbest things like being sandwiched spawned by megaton twins resulting in instant death. No need to use mystery box because your class isnt limited to sidearms only.
>gun specific rants:
>m4 doesnt use bolt catch
>aug is burst fire
>chinese name for sks
>akm is called ak47
>no warsaw pact pistols
>pp19 was a gun from the 90s
Customization in general is stupid. Why do drum mags only carry 40 or 50 and some banana mags carry the same amount? Who uses flashlights and why do they work so dumb in this game? Stats for each gun mod are stupid and make little to no sense.
>Conclusion:
Just play anything but this, dont give activision money they dont deserve it you wont enjoy the unfinished product, imma just play mw4 and bo1 until S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2 comes out and never buy a video game again
>>
>>168945
Definitely better than bo5
>>
>>168839
What he meant is that only 3 of them are somewhat enjoyable those being alpine, satellite and oh wait nuketown hasnt been released yet, and you can play that map on bo1
>>
>>167684
Dont give in, everyone will soon realize its WWII but slightly better
>>
>>171372
why the fuck is black ops 1 at the price that it is today
>>
>>171448
Because its more enjoyable than anything that came out after ghosts
>>
>>167684
>doesn't own the game
>calls it trash regardless

Stop picking up opinions from the internet, sheep
>>
>>168976
your frames did
>>
MW Attachments:
>totally change the look and feel of your gun
>unique attachments for certain guns
>soul

CW Attachments:
>make your gun barrel 0.5" longer or shorter
>literally the same for every gun
>soulless
>>
>>172541
I agree, mw4 attachments not only had realistic effects, they could give you options for creating other models the akm could be made into an rpk74/47, 100series ak, draco, aks74(u), or an m4 into a honey badger, customization was absolutely fun in mw4, shame the maps couldnt be selected because most of them sucked otherwise that game has a chance of still being enjoyable

Bo5 on the other hand, who the fuck uses flashlights, why dont any of the attachments make sense, why are they ugly
>>
>>172541
I just wish they told you what the stats fucking mean. I get that you're supposed to look at the Pros + Cons, not the stat bars, but I appreciate that Cold War actually gives me hard statistics of what each item changes. Which sucks because MW would be GOAT with that feature.

I'm still not entirely sure what recoil control is vs recoil stabilization, or aim stability.
>>
>>165744
So when are they going to fix it on PC? I drop to 20 fps whenever someone shoots me.
I tried refunding but I had too much playtime.
>>
>>172541
>>172691
I really hope they still update MW2019 more I vastly still prefer it and even warzone over cold war
>>
File: 1606419137814.jpg (69 KB, 540x539)
69 KB
69 KB JPG
Not as polished as MW, but I think the general gameplay for 6v6 is a lot more fun. I'd say that even though CW has shittier animations and graphics and such, the game itself is enjoyable. Though if you're a gun nut then look away, there's some bullshit attachments like a 12rnd revolver that still visually only has 6 rounds. Game is fun, not polished.
>>
>>171360
hard agree. mw3 was terrible and cod has been mostly bad since then, but I can't comment on the newer games because the last one I played was BO3. Played a bit of BO4 and hated every moment of it.





Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.