MY STATURE INVESTMENT

MY PORTFOLIO

Meta has turned to shit. It's all really harsh control decks that spam your lanes and negative them. Pay 50 bucks per new card or stpp trying to play is becoming the standard for the game now.

File: 1-7.png (176 KB, 285x233)

176 KB PNG

Nebula make ya Seethe?

The way they write it is so faggy too
>we've decided Black Bolt's day in the sun is over
>we're making it now to ensure we see this deck fall off it's lofty perch
A relatively f2p friendly deck? (3 pool 4s)
NOPE CAN'T HAVE THAT ALL FUCK ALL YOU POORFAGS LMAO

File: 1597475189240.jpg (20 KB, 540x507)

20 KB JPG

Re-update:

Black Bolt
[Old] 5/8 - On Reveal: Your opponent must discard the lowest-Cost card in their hand.
[New] 5/7 - On Reveal: Your opponent must discard the lowest-Cost card in their hand.

Stature
[Old] 5/7 - Costs 1 if your opponent discarded a card from their hand this game.
[New] 5/6 - Costs 1 if your opponent discarded a card from their hand this game.

Negasonic Teenage Warhead
[Old] 3/4 - After ANY card is played here, destroy this card AND that card.
[New] 3/5 - After ANY card is played here, destroy this card AND that card.

Invisible Woman
[Old] 2/2 - Ongoing: Cards you play here are not revealed until the game ends.
[New] 2/3 - Ongoing: Cards you play here are not revealed until the game ends.

As of today, we’ve temporarily removed the following three locations from the game:
- Plunder Castle
- Milano
- Sandbar

File: 1676433527077029.png (438 KB, 432x405)

438 KB PNG

>>431203291
>deck has winrates comparable to the most powerful deck in the history of the game
>"nooo don't nerf it because..just don't ok???"

File: 125611-177877-stature.jpg (77 KB, 400x466)

77 KB JPG

They paid for Darkhawk's sins

>>431203459
I taught they were gonna nerf spoodermane or something galactus adjacent not gut the whole stature shell, weird nerf desu

>>431203715
Yes? Because that deck wasn't nearly as good? It just so happens the meta is in a good place right now, but even so there will always be a deck that rises above the rest?
But that's fine because that deck wasn't as oppressively unbearable as some of the others in the past?
So nerfing both cards is fucking retarded?????
Like why the fuck would you nerf both black bolt and stature when black bolts sole purpose is to get stature to 1 cost otherwise he's garbage and nobody would play him?????????????

>>431203291
in what world is 3 pool 4's budget, also the best version runs jeff the crybaby too
like the only more expensive deck I can think of is galacuck and maybe optimized master mold lol

File: slowpoke_mem_animal_pokem(...).jpg (199 KB, 1920x1080)

199 KB JPG

>>431203459

>>431203947
>Because that deck wasn't nearly as good?
It was clearly that good relative to the current meta

>>431203894
I'm so mad I literally JUST bought her.

Guys I can't stop masturbating every time I get Gamma Lab as a location when I have females in my deck. It's just so fucking hot to think about an attractive woman like Wasp just walking along going about her day, only to be hit by gamma radiation and turned into the fucking Hulk. She doesn't even get to be She-Hulk, the location literally forces her to grow a penis and turn into a man. Her breasts? Gone. Her womb? Gone. God forbid she was pregnant at the time. Her whole life, forever upended. Everything she knows, destroyed. And then Shang Chi comes along and just fucking socks her in the face, as if her day wasn't bad enough already. God it's just so fucking hot anons, I will throw games just to play women into that location and watch them be horrifically transformed by it.

File: 1671536041962766.png (507 KB, 500x710)

507 KB PNG

>he bought a series 4 card

>>431204083
it was good like two weeks ago, the wave change turned it's biggest strength upside down

>>431204083
No it wasn't dumbass. There's a difference.
A deck can be good but still not be oppressive. Nobody fucking liked Shuri meta or prenerf Zabu because those decks were retarded and impossible to beat.
Stature is good but not impossible to beat and the matchup isn't fucking annoying.

>>431204229
u gonna be happy man once spider pig hops in the game.

>>431204336
>No it wasn't
Yes it was
They literally said so

>>431204405
The devs don't actually play this game they just look at stats and even then they read the stats wrong.
A deck can have a good winrate and the meta still be healthy with that deck existing. Which was the case here, this is just killing an entire deck which is actually worse for the meta since there are less playable decks now.
Stature existing didn't invalidate other decks in the same way Shuri did.

File: 1576927366245.jpg (43 KB, 960x960)

43 KB JPG

>they nerfed stature AND BLACK BOLT and the deck isn't even a month old
>meanwhile shuri was going strong for months and so is galactus

>>431205025
Fewer

>>431205105
There was no Over The Ass back then, they would have made Shuri 4-1 when she became a problem.

Kek at them removing 2 of the newest locations.

I feel like they barely even add new locations anymore... and each time they do they are shit and get removed lol.

How fucking hard is it to make fun/neutral locations?

>>431205025
This is all cope

>>431205870
I'm 100% right.

>>431206204
You can't be 100% right because you have no idea what data they're even looking at
You're coping hard

>>431205837
They add locations regularly. We just had Fogwell's Gym which was actually a pretty good location to feature since it was basically a double booster weekend and now it's just a neutral location.

>>431206365
You know you can read the patch notes? And I'm those notes they say why they make the changes they make.
Black Bolt and Stature were nerfed because their cube rate was high. But they even acknowledge that the Wave change fucked the deck into being not as good anymore, so this is a retarded change to hit both at the same time.
If just Stature was nerfed you could maybe still play the deck, bit hitting Black Bolt too means you don't put out enough power anymore.

>>431206365
we know it's true when we had a dev get interviewed by dera looked at the shuri data and straight up said "red skull is the problem". the shuri debacle going for months is when everyone knew they don't know how to interpret their data.

>>431207269
Ok, please describe what data they're looking at and how they're interpreting it then

>straight up getting rid of those trash "cant do x" locations
Fucking finally

>>431205837
>When you play a card here, you get -1 energy next turn
>The player with more cards here has +1 max energy
>After turn 4, double the power of cards in this location
>Whoever is winning this location gets -2 to the other locations
>After turn 4, inflict -1 to every card here
>This turn, each card played here gets +2 power
>Add Deadpool to each player's hand
>When a player fills this location, change it into Death's Domain
>3-Cost cards here have +3 power
>At the start of each turn, give a card in each player's hand -1 cost
>Each turn, you can move one card to this location
>All location effects are disabled on turn 6
>You can't play cards here this turn
>After turn 5, fill the losing player's side with rocks
>You can only play here on even turns
Here i made up a bunch of non-oppressive ones in 5 minutes.

>>431205025
Stature losing one power I think is fine, hell she could have lost two to make her more in line with Miles but they should have kept blackbolt 8

>>431207479
they literally describe it themselves and we know it's not very different from the tracker sites and if anything their data is less complete with how often they say "we don't have data on that. they have been explaining their reasoning and anyone can tell it's retarded. "red skull is the highest winrate card in the game" "shuri has some matchups where she's even" (not filering out mirrors and matches where shuri wasn't played)

>>431205025
stature lowered both the play and winrate of shang chi therefore it had to go, please understand

joking aside;
I kinda agree with you in the sense that they really should look at more than data, and it's generally old data too which doesn't help ease frustration in the now
although they did finally change wave which gives me hope that they might start doing things more properly in the future, even though it's kinda weird that it came right after they fucked around with sandman
anyways stature was lame too in a way, it was just a bunch of strong cards you couldn't really counter thrown together, barring that there was no real gameplan in the deck, like I don't think the game should work like that either

HE needs nerfs already

>>431208252
Ok, please describe it if the information is out there?
Please quote the stats they gave us?
You talk like you know them so what are they?

File: 1587113838261.jpg (29 KB, 487x367)

29 KB JPG

>>431208431

>>431208252
the trick in this data economy for keaping cards broken is to play meme vertions of your op decks after you abused them for infinete. that is why I run cerbro 2 with galactus.

>>431208549
I just don't understand why Luke doesn't hard counter him. He needs to be nerfed already or this game is gonna go down the shitter

>>431207670
All decent locations unironically aside this
>All location effects are disabled on turn 6
I'd make that like t4 or t5

>>431208450
were you just not around for it? everyone was talking about this shit.
https://twitter.com/KMBestMS/status/1638902392027762688
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUINVjQpZVI
they were defending every decision in the wake of the shuri "nerfs" on twitter and the community was criticising their resoning based on the stats they were sharing with the community

File: 1557435924863.gif (147 KB, 320x240)

147 KB GIF

>>431208852

I don't get why iron lad summons to 6 power broodlings. They should be 2 power. This card is fucking broken. Why the fuck does he have 6 fucking power himself and also have such a game winning ability?

>>431208924
Is that it?
"She had some matchups that were 50-52%"? "Thanos has a 48% winrate vs Shuri"?
Do you think that's comprehensive in any way?
Do you realize Glenn says in a reply to that very same tweet they have data they don't share?

>79 to 72 and on almost nothing but impossible to win retreats
Im just gonna uninstall. I hate the direction the game is going and they simply aren't nerfing the cards fast enough that are broken. The newest card is clearly too strong and it'll only get worse from here on out.

>space throne 4 times in a row on the left side
The fuck?

File: 7C2F70E6-CEF1-46F6-9E9E-6(...).jpg (47 KB, 828x378)

47 KB JPG

>Last turn
>I'm winning all lanes thanks to abusing luke's bar with Mjolnir and locking the middle lane with Thor, Omega Red and prof X.
>Card reveal time
>As expected he Shangs my entire right lane but then the bot drops Wanda on Luke's bar
>"3 power. It doesn't m-"
>>>>>>"The strongest card here duplicates it's power"

The win 3 locations in a match is hard

>>431209267
glenn was saying they don't share the data at all and that they were sharing the data because they were in damage control. which is why he was getting clowned. also look at his discord statements. When he said on the discard "nobody ever asked us to nerf the best card in the game" and it turned out he was talking about fucking sauron. a card with a tiny playrate and it's winrate was only so high because it was only ever played in the early shuri decks in the early meta. or "we don't know" when hoogland asked for data on how many people retreat against galactus.

>>431208852
why would Luke counter Shocker/MK etc?

>>431210181
>glenn was saying they don't share the data at all and that they were sharing the data because they were in damage control
No, that's not what he was saying

>>431206395
huh i missed that one completely

>>431210329
>That’s data we don’t share (I only did because the patch will shift it)
"We don't normally share data(but literally just did)
stop posting if your reading comprehension is going to be so poor,

>>431210230
He should counter cards that gain from having cards power reduced like Abom and Hulk

>>431210402
You missed out. If you were willing to lose some ranks, then it was a great time to throw together a shit deck full of cards you wanted variants for and get an insane amount of boosters.

File: 0e3.gif (2.66 MB, 320x214)

2.66 MB GIF

>discard nerf
>it's just blackbolt and stature

>>431210778
>Hey @Glenn_Jones_, I don't suppose you can tell me what these matchups were?
>That’s data we don’t share
And then he refers to the exception he made by giving out the Shuri vs Thanos winrate
Completely unsurprising to see Dunning Kruger in full effect in yourself, someone who doesn't have access to the data the devs have, someone who can't even accurately interpret a conversation, STILL thinking you have everything figured out because...I'm just very smart you know??
Have some fucking self awareness

>>431209602
I think card balance right now is actually fairly solid, the only things I definitely want nerfed are nebula and zabu, at least in relation to shang/enchantress
like I'm not sure if evolutionary kong is actually unbalanced just yet, for now I personally do not like how 1-2-3 curve he is and how his counter is a niché card
but he does highlight a very severe problem with their card acquisiton model, everyone and their mother saved for this one card so now it's all you see
this is bound to happen again and again and skew metas and therefore balance

Is Stature actually unplayable now? Because I just bought her like two days ago.

It doesn't take a genius to see that their nerfs are missing the mark.
Stature+Black Bolt was (marginally) too strong after the Shuri nerf. But it was far from oppressive like old Thanos or old Shuri. They hit them too hard. Also the nerf came too late, this happened three weeks ago but since then we've had Kitty Pride and HE and most importantly the Wave change. The Stature deck was good because Deathwave was a particularly strong choice in the metagame, countered Galactus, Sera decks and everything in between and generally had good match ups.
Getting waved meant very little if you could slam a 16-power Taskmaster+Stature+Miles or something similar while discarding their Death (sometimes it was She-Hulk + Taskmaster).
These things no longer exist. Then why nerf Black Bolt and Stature? She's already hit by the Wave change. They should have waited at least a week before deciding.
Galactus, Kitty Pride, Iron Lad variations and DH-Zabu have been much stronger this week (and now we have HE as well). You can see it in recent cube rates etc. In other words, the nerf came ~15 days late and various cards and decks are no longer the same or playable.
We play the game every day, we play/watch tournaments, we can see which decks are oppressive, and BB-St is nowhere near as powerful. No amount of "secret developer data" will change that, if anything it gives us an indication that they don't know what they're doing or they totally misinterpret the data.
I personally think the problem is that new cards come out, the metagame changes and by the time they interpret the data and decide what to nerf, the cards might actually no longer be a problem. There's only one way to solve this, have someone who is really good at the game and plays constantly advise them on OTA changes super-quickly. He can make an assessment much faster than it takes them to figure things out.
>>431212424
No, but the deck won't be top tier any longer.

>>431211617
nice mental gymnastics retarded bootlicker. he didn't post the data because he didn't know it. that's why immediately after he says he'll look into it.Posting the shuri winrates is part of "data we don't share"

There was absolutely NO defending the shuri buffs which is exactly why glenn got roasted alive. He gave his reasoning which conistently only made him look worse. "shuri is an exciting deck".

I don't think I had black bolt played against me once this year.

File: image_2023-05-25_223110115.png (616 KB, 620x564)

616 KB PNG

I love hazmat

>>431203053
Yes because when I use her she does nothing. Am I supposed to use her as bait in HE?

File: 1684641854212872.jpg (4 KB, 138x157)

4 KB JPG

>>431203459
>Black bolt
>Stature
Honestly hilarious that they got nerfed when in reality the things that needed to be hit are zabu/sera (stupid mana cheat shit) and shang (only reason they were played was because it dodges shang which controls too much of the meta).
Also lol @ nerfing the top deck right when HE comes out. Gotta force that new meta!
>negasonic
>invis
Meh. It won't change much but I guess irs nice.
>locations
Actually the funniest thing here. the fact that even something like sandbar which is super new got removed is basically them admitting that they made a mistake with designing locations.

>>431205462
>forgetting red skull ota

the fact that they could've just put shuri to 5 for like a week or two with their ota crap but didn't still makes me mad

File: 1684950949641029.jpg (59 KB, 634x483)

59 KB JPG

>>431204292
>he is waiting for DH to drop to series 3

>>431217419
But anon red skull was the real problem!

>""""buff"""" Invisible Woman out of Cerebro 2
FUCK OFF BRODE YOU HACK

do you guys think there is a secret op card that people don't know about.

>>431218486
mbaku

>>431217501
Not that anon but next time I see dh in my rotation I am snagging. I just haven't been checking periodically enough so he's probably shown up and I missed him

>>431218383
Just play C3 ;^)

>>431218486
unicorn priest in 5

>>431218383
I don't get why thats a buff. most deck playing her are playing overstated stuff. or combos. how is a +1 gonna help. I agree with you anon did wanted to nerf cerebro.

what did they nerf c2 cause it counters HE?

>>431218873
Why would they, nobody plays c2

Black Bolt being viable for the first time ever and immediately getting nerfed is pretty funny even if it is a sensible decision

>>431218873
it doesn't necessarily
the point of c2 is that you beat midrolls with your midroll, and vs HE you kinda need to highroll and get luke and a combination of draws +locations that lets you keep him and cerb away from enchantress

>>431219660
if he was a big bad this whould not happen

>>431219660
if he was named white bolt this would not happen

>nerfs stature after a series drop

File: 1685050817625.jpg (1.39 MB, 1988x3056)

1.39 MB JPG

>>431218486
Maria Hill

File: suspicious-nat.jpg (46 KB, 299x545)

46 KB JPG

>>431218486
Absolutely not and fuck you for asking

>>431219660
If he was vaccinated this would not happen

A few weeks late for the the Black Bils Stature nerf, fucking retards.

I think HE the card can use a buff. Why would I ever play a abilityless 4/4?

Are card game developers usually this retarded? This is, admittedly, the first card game I've spent an extended time with.

File: 1685052016369.png (2.47 MB, 1440x2560)

2.47 MB PNG

I just noticed this is Jen Bartel. I might have to buy the pass just for that.

>>431222773
This, make him a 4/5 SD

Can someone post a Thanoless High Evo deck. I'm too stupid to figure this out.

File: IMG_20230525_202801.jpg (350 KB, 1080x685)

350 KB JPG

>>431223840
>>431182942
>>431182732
Then there's a very basic and strong like picrel

>>431223194

>>431223194
Ben Brode sure is

>>431223194
SD is not that bad in a game design sense, they are just really slow, their biggest problem is greed, which all big card games are if you do not live in Japan

>>431224350
Thanks Bae.
This game really needs more deck slots, I keep having to delete other decks to try out these new ones.

>>431223194
It varies. I'd argue they all get their bad moments but you can usually tell whats a genuine mistake and what's just them being retarded (guess which SD is). The only one i felt was as bad as SD was HS ironically.

>>431223194
Gwent completely redesigned their game after a beta with a cash shop in it and made the game no longer resemble gwent from the previous witcher games

Hey guys. Love you all. I don't post much lately but I miss you guys and am having some fun with HE.
.t Green Goblin Guy (sorry for the attention whoring, just having a little fun with you guys!)

>>431224620
>SD is not that bad in a game design sense
I would disagree since the core problem was that certain things shouldn't have existed in the first place (like OG Zabu). You can say they're slow like with shuri but ultimately I feel like the problem was them being slow but the fact that they actively would ignore her (despite everyone saying she's the problem) to just nerf things like red skull. The fact that they lower the rate on certain locations and now even removed some is basically admission that they don't know how to design.

>>431224693
what's driving me insane is when I want to clear my old decks it takes me back to the end of the list after each one so I have to swipe back to the beginning again every time

>>431225271
>The fact that they lower the rate on certain locations and now even removed some is basically admission that they don't know how to design.
this is what I mean when I say they are slow, the core game is good and they still have a long way to reach retarded power creep, the game is in a decent balanced state rn
The shuri thing was pure greed as anyone could have guessed at the time or see in hindsight

>>431225271
it's an iterative process and they're clearly improving the game over time which is crazy in 2023

>>431225161
It's okay. You've been overtaken by the Patriot guy and the Mysterio guy in terms of sheer autism

>>431225734
Well what would you consider to be the core game if now the cards and locations that come out? Just the general mechanics? If so then I guess I agree though they really need to add a log to see previous actions.

>>431226319
I think you're being way too generous. The fact that it is 2023 means the quality should be high. We've seen card games succeed and fail and they should be able to see the mistakes of the past and learn from them even if this is their first card game especially when brode is in charge. Also every month there's some new bs they do. Its more like one step forward and two steps back.

where were you when blackbolt and stature where killed?

>>431227210
A week ago when they were already falling out of the meta? I guess work as usual.

>>431226760
kek thanks sounds fun

>>431227785
true I guess today was just the funerals

Im enjoying WINNING with High Evo. But the deck itself I don't think is very fun.

>>431229857
I'm enjoying losing with high evo so that the statistics look worse such that he doesn't get nerfed :^)

>>431229857
He seems boring as sin

>>431231280
What's boring about him compared to every other big bad and majority of other cards?

>>431231815
I feel like people call decks that don't have big wombo combos boring. High Evo so far is pretty straight forward. You either go all in on negative cards or you do the ongoing/extra energy route.

I wish I had bought Jeff instead

HE Shocker feels like ass desu I'm taking this motherfucker out of the deck

>>431235283
yeah an effective 1/3 is too weak on its own

>>431235283
Thought I could finally use my lovely shocker variant but he still sucks
at least it's true to character lol

>>431235842
Hes alright in Patriot desu

>>431235283
shocker is for reducing hulk specifically. in the quasi shenaut HE deck.

>>431236481
>it's another Moon Girl big power card + she Hulk to slam a bunch of shit down turn 6 deck

One of the weaknesses of snap is the limited decks and how everything is just a variation of Devil Dino from pool 2

>>431203963
Elaborate on optimized master mold please good sir

>>431237515
Dino reigns supreme

https://twitter.com/Moyen_HS/status/1661393254292635648
get this shit out of the game

>>431241676
This doesn't look very good desu

>>431242058
>hit something stupid with iron lad
>wave on 5
>leader on 6
no bad matchups

>>431242257
>>431241676
Also interestingly enough:
>Auto lose vs Galactus
But there's barely any in tournaments

File: Screenshot_20230525_19003(...).jpg (795 KB, 1080x2400)

795 KB JPG

So is that Stature deck dead or is it still playable?

>>431242871
he covered that. wave on the galactus lane into leader can't counter galactus like old leader

>>431243120
*can

>>431243120
>Gets ockted and

>>431243294
the ock line is reatreat for every deck. the point kinda is just to pull down the galactus coutners and or biggest power sources. less shang chi means ock is able part of why the revis list can't win with shuri ock without playing galactus.

>>431238464
master mold/ronan with iron lad, darkhawk and zabu
that would be the most expensive deck I can think of

>>431224620
Weebs get the rope. Japan is extremely greedy to the pointnof being Jews in basically every market. They sold you unfinished games then released a complete edition 3 months later. Than tried to sell the international version with bug fixes since months after and all were full retail. And don't even get me started on their TCGs were they make cards 1 a box or even 1 an entire case and then require you to need 4 for a deck.

The ironic thing if saying Japan isn't greedy is their biggest boom in history was them all lying and giving fake loans to each other until it collapsed and Japan still hasn't recovered and has multiple generations of neets because of it.

Second dinner are shit for many many reasons but Japan isn't any better. They use these models because they make money and unless you stop whales you're going to continue to see them.

>>431243497
I've played a ton of battle mode. You can retreat the first few for -4. Usually you win one so it's more like 7-9 hp. Turn 5 has double stakes. Then every time you snap it's 4 hp which is enormous. If you have a single line that is auto-retreat you just have to draw it three times and you win the match. Meanwhile a single snap for them can mean countersnap for 8 hp, total disaster.
I did exactly that on one of the tournaments i won, after some slow play for four rounds, they were basically forced to lose two cubes when i snapped turn 2-3 (pretty much on zero info for them), or risk at least four. After the first one-two times they are forced to stay and it's over.
In other words, if i sacrifice 3-4 hp, and then start snapping turn 3 nearly every game, are they gonna risk 4+ hp on the chance of me having electro into doc?

>>431224620
The jap mobile TCGs I've played were way greedier than this
Like Duel Links infamously requires a fucking ridiculous amount of money to build a deck and they don't compensate you at all when they nerf it.
Shadowverse wasn't much better from what I remember

File: H.E. IS CRAZY.jpg (425 KB, 1532x1000)

425 KB JPG

>>431202762
so, that just happened...

>>431244424
Duel links is basically a half gacha and SV was very generous when I played

>>431244839
>a half gacha
you buy booster packs, calling anything that fits that a half gacha makes every single traditional tcg a half gacha lol

>>431243497
>>431244279
Also, this doesn't take into account the typical Wave into Galactus into Spiderman.
So there's two ways you automatically lose.
It's a 95-5% if you know how to pilot Galactus in battle mode.
>Snap every time you have Electro-Doc-Galactud
>Snap every time you have Wave-Galactus-Spiderman
>Drain their hp rapidly on high stakes
You only need to not get baited into staying where you shouldn't.

>>431244279
problem for glactus is all the decks that can can deny him an empty lane by turn 3, a lot in tournament and once such was revis's first match If galactus is already countered then ock isn't an auto retreat but for the galactus player helpful for getting a bigger win.

agaisnt leader that requires electro into ock specifically as many game will happen wher the galactus will have to hope they didn't draw leader. and the leader player can commit easily after there's no chance of an ock coming down. and after the minimum cube threshold is reached there's no harm in letting ock play out to see if he whiffs the needed cards.

>>431245110
wave spider-man also loses to leader since they can leader on the same turn as spiderman and have the point advantage.

>>431244628
He's not that crazy desu

>>431244628
this is what every multiplayer game's like now on youtube
they do this for nba 2k every fucking week and that game doesn't even have major changes, they just pretend some slight variation on the established build is new and all say it's good

File: Screenshot_20230525-212600.jpg (742 KB, 1080x2193)

742 KB JPG

This is what it feels like to play thanos in 2023

>>431245272
Everything in your post was wrong.
First of all, proper Galactus builds have Shuri Nimrod Wolverine, which this deck can't beat easily by going 20+ on two locations.
Secondly, you cannot Leader on turn 5, unless you waved on turn 4 when the Galactus player nuked your locations. Then you lose to every OTHER play if you blindly leader on 5, e.g. from a Doc Oc.
>problem for glactus is all the decks that can can deny him an empty lane by turn 3, a lot in tournament and once such was revis's first match
This sentence isn't in English.
> If galactus is already countered then ock isn't an auto retreat but for the galactus player helpful for getting a bigger win.
This doesn't make any sense at all, are you esl or drunk?
>will have to hope they didn't draw leader. and the leader player can commit easily after there's no chance of an ock coming down
Why? i specifically pointed at two ways where you beat leader.
>and after the minimum cube threshold is reached there's no harm in letting ock play out to see if he whiffs the needed cards.
So if i snap on 3, are you risking 4-8 hp on the chance doc oc whiffs?
>wave spider-man also loses to leader since they can leader on the same turn as spiderman and have the point advantage.
completely false, they typically can't unless they drew wave and leader perfectly, they had priority/played wave on the correct location, AND the opponent doesn't ock turn 5. So you risk 4 hp on something that's far, far less than 50-50, more like 20-25%.

>>431246572
the galactus deck brought into tournaments does no play spider-man. but even if it does, galactus is always countered by playing wave in the galactus lane full stop. leader will always break parity. that's the whole point, turn 4 or 5 galactus are beat by wave. this should be obvious to you, thee's no reason not to play wave on the galctus lane when galactus is coming.

>So if i snap on 3, are you risking 4-8 hp on the chance doc oc whiffs?
no they stay when the game has gone on long enough that there is no longer benefit to retreated and it won't reduce the cubes lost.

wave -gaklactus spider-man is more of a specific combo than just wave leader. again, not that it matters because that's not the battle mode galactus deck. this is
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28alpWYWxRw
he mainly beat a clog deck through shuri doc ock and not galactus.

>>431245102
Other card games don't have you grinding to unlock characters and skills for your decks. Its obviously very different from a traditional tcg.

>>431245559
Quinjet was the only thing keeping this deck alive

>>431247460
>galactus is always countered by playing wave in the galactus lane full stop
This is completely wrong.
which turn are you playing it? turn 4 or 5?
If you wave on turn 4, you have 25% chance or less to win the game. You need perfect draws and you lose to alternative plays like Oc.
If you wave on 5, you lose to either turn 4 octopus or turn 5 spiderman. You also lose to destroyer, they get a wolverine and a destroyer while you lose all your shit.
Are you even thinking about the stuff you're typing?
>no they stay when the game has gone on long enough that there is no longer benefit to retreated and it won't reduce the cubes lost
So you lose 4+ hit points each time. If it happens 3 times you lost.
>Irrelevant video
We aren't talking about a clog deck

>>431245559
>be greedy as fuck with shit like leech and odin in the list
>WAHHHH WAHHH MY DRAWS ARE BRICKED
Stupid bitch

>>431248010
>have america chavez
>play standard and challenging lockjaw deck
>get called stupid bitch

>>431247998
if it is wave it's turn 4 galactus, everone knows as such. glactus will never have piority agaisnt a zabu deck while leader ties galactus at the absolute worst and wins if anythign else was already in that lane. as is usually the case. way more needs to go right for galactus to win. having both wave and leader is not hard, at all. if that lane isn't empty then wave doesn't even need to be in the galactus lane. a much more relyable win than relying on ock pulling down leader. the chances of winning are enough that if you don't have much to gain from retreated stayign for the ock can also give you the win.

that galactus deck folds to any bad matchup and thus isn't brought into battle mode ever. that's why revis made a list that wins with shuri taskmaster shit without any ramping even just from bad draws.

>>431248945
>glactus will never have piority agaisnt a zabu deck while leader ties galactus at the absolute worst and wins if anythign else was already in that lane
>I play Galactus turn 4, you play?
>If you wave, then i doc oc or destroyer
>You lose

>You play Leader
>I play destroyer
>I have a wolverine and destroyer
>You have destroyer
>You lose

>empty then wave doesn't even need to be in the galactus lane
>I play wave on 3
>You answer with wave on 4
>I play octopus
>you lose

>I play electro into oc
>You lose

>you play Wave and shit while i Wolverine shuri nimrod
>you lose

>you Leader at any point
>I play Destroyer, have wolverine
>You lose

>>431249935
at worst most of those are ties and not losses with leader. literally all jsut ad hoc arguments with your own specific galactus list assuming your opponent doesn't have shang chi. yes like revis sometimes it's better to play something other than galactus to win. then then it's not a fucking auto loss to galactus now is it? Leader conistently beats the glactus playline itself. and can still beat the alternate win conditions. "but I can do something else maybe" isn't relevant.

>>431251202
>Leader conistently beats the glactus playline itself
it almost never does, i explained clearly enough why not.
You just repeat it without argument every time you get demolished.
>"but I can do something else maybe" isn't relevant.
It is if it reduces your win rate to 5%
You have never played Galactus in a tournament and it shows.
Leader is really bad vs Galactus, Destroyer and Spiderman wreck you.

>>431251525
>it almost never does, i explained clearly enough why not.
yeah and you were wrong and retarded. you explicitly said that spider-man beats wave leader. That was objectively wrong. int eh worst case scenario of the lane being completely empty then leader ties the galactus and spider-man. jsut like wave leader always beating glactus on 5. Admit you made a mistake and said somethignclearly incorrect and I might consider earnestly engaging with you.

All your arguments are ad hocc nonsensical and miss the forest for the trees. Moyen has already won several tournaments with the leader list and that's why he made the posts. He's beaten galactus and that's how he knows how to win. Revis placed with glactus in tournament not using your list for a reason.

>>431252437
>explicitly said that spider-man beats wave leader
You're completely retarded
Here's a diagram for your 90iq
Can you Leader on 5?
No-> Spiderman. I win.
Yes->Destroyer/Oc. I win.
Do i have Electro into Oc into Galactus?
I win.
It is turn 6. Can you Leader?
Yes: Destroyer, or Galactus my Nimrod and Wolverine. I win.
No: Knull etc. I win.
>Moyen has already won several tournaments with the leader list and that's why he made the posts. He's beaten galactus and that's how he knows how to win
pffffffhahahahahahahah you're funny.
That's what your (lack of) argument based on? Am empty statement with no data? Plus argument from authority? I've also won with Galactus, lists without direct counters to Galactus are hopeless, simply because i can pick and choose when and where and what to do, while they can't, they can only hope to match my plays while i drain their hp with proper snaps.
There's hardly any Galactus in tournaments for various reasons. The list you posted folds to any reasonable Galactus list 95% of the time.
>All your arguments are ad hocc nonsensical and miss the forest
The forest is that the list you posted can almost never beat a Galactus deck in battle mode. There's no way around that.

>>431253378
you are the kid on the playground with "beats everything sword. The answer to the leader always beats spider-man argument is NOT SOMETHIGN THAT ISN'T LEADER VS SPIDER-MAN. you can win with but "but what if you dont have/but what if i have). It obviously goes both ways. and at msot making uncommon plays is only a guessing game in your favor once.

>>431218486
omega red

average stat spread for 4 costs with no utility is 8
average stats for 4 costs with negative effects is 10
omega red is a 4 cost with 13 power if activated

>>431254030
Why would i play spiderman if you can Leader? You're not making any sense.
There's only one possible way you can Leader on 5: if YOU waved on turn 4, while i Galactus. Then I don't need to play Spiderman, i can oc of destroyer and win.
> It obviously goes both ways.
No it doesn't you mongoloid, you only have two cards to beat me while i have 5+ and multiple play patterns to work around them
You're hopeless unless I'm retarded enough to make a terrible mistake.
>uncommon plays is only a guessing game in your favor once
I explained how i don't need to guess though. I play based on what i SEE, like if you can play Leader or not, or if you waved on 4 or not, or if i have Electro into Oc into Galactus or not. No guesses there.

>>431254736
you said spider-man beats leader. spider-man loses to leader. Are we in agreement? no more ad hoc reasoning. it is easier to have leader than to have specifc combos.

>>431254143
except not really because he requires you to "waste" at least 9 power on activating him

>>431255223
No, in the list you posted there's only one way to play Leader before turn 6, so most of the time spiderman will beat leader.
Spiderman will also beat leader on turn 5 if wolverine is strong enough.
Don't forget that you spent turn 4 playing wave, so your location can be very weak as well. And if it is, spiderman can beat Leader. Galactus + Wolverine is 6-8 power. You lose if you have 3-5 there. NOTICE THE IMPORTANT PART: I HAVE A CHOICE HERE (Spidey) AND YOU DON'T.
So no, we're not in agreement, you are wrong.
> it is easier to have leader than to have specifc combos.
You need a specific combo to not lose instantly:
>Priority (or correct guess)
>Wave
>Leader
>Me not playing around all this, like a retard
You lose almost always. You're the one drowning in ad hoc reasoning.

File: 1685071077048.jpg (2.03 MB, 1440x2095)

2.03 MB JPG

Don't retreat fucker, this is the only deck I have that runs 6 costs.

>somehow keep coming up against people spamming 1 cost cards
>my killmonger is never drawn

man fuck nebula how did this shitass card release like this

File: Screenshot_20230525-23121(...).jpg (1.31 MB, 1440x2960)

1.31 MB JPG

Lol I got the funny leech variant.

File: msedge_gtrvxBQ2QB.png (913 KB, 927x614)

913 KB PNG

m'baku + lockjaw unironically better than you think it is. not only have I won games because of that combo, I also lost a fuckin mirror match because of a lockjaw-ed m'baku and laughed heartily

a lot of the spots are flexible in this, juggernaut seems good against the evolutionary stuff IF you can keep the board so that you flip first; no point in moving the guys after they already debuff you. in fact it just kinda helps them debuff you more.

>>431256010
okay but how often do you have wolverine wave galactus and spider-man all drawn in order? do you not see the hypocrosy? as if the leader player can't obviously tell as well when leader wins? that's how far you have to go in your ad hoc arguments to jsutify your position.

>>431256770
also I don't own luke cage is mostly why I am running juggernaut

>>431256591
Nebula is fine, Kitty on the other side is busted AF

>>431256770
This deck could use Doom

>>431257060
nebula is absolutely not fine, basically an unconditional 1/5-7 if you play her out on turn 1, provided the dumb bitch doesn't get killmongered
kitty only gets kinda crazy with bishop and angela on the board and gets hard dicked by wave / sandman

>>431257421
You're high. Nebula is straight trash that does nothing, gets wasped, cyclops, and thinged
If I could trade this useless trash in for another S5 I would

>>431257421
>>431257742
Nebula is a top 3 one energy drop, she isn't trash but not OP if you learn how to play around her.

>>431256859
>okay but how often do you have wolverine wave galactus and spider-man all drawn in order?
About as often as i have electro oc Galactus, and wolverine electro shuri nimrod Galactus, and electro oc destroyer knull etc.
There's a ton of play patterns, you don't know what's coming. But you only have wave and leader, that's it.
Are you staying if i snap on turn 2, to find out? Who's got the upper hand here? Can YOU ever confidently snap on turn 3? Even if you have Wave Leader in hand you might get oct'd or destroyer'd.
The deck will simply drain all your hp by snapping when it beats you, while you have no idea what's coming each time and if you can beat it. Are you gonna retreat every time? It's not that you can't possibly win, it's that i have all the choice of when to play the games out with increased odds and you don't. Therefore we're (almost) never in a situation of 4+ cubes where you have the upper hand, while we're constantly in situations of 4+ cubes where i have the upper hand. Unless you retreat every time i snap, which is a guaranteed loss anyway.
>that's how far you have to go in your ad hoc arguments to jsutify your position.
You should look in the mirror.

>>431258057
No she's trash. I tried to give it another shot, but I might as well play Sunspot or HE Misty

>>431258174
I got to infinite thanks to her, you probably didn't play good support cards for her: like Armor,Green Goblin, Polaris,Debrii, Aero etc. Also she got the same dynamic then Lizard, they both ''force'' your opponent to play on their lane and good players can capitalize on that situation.

Nebula into cyclops is devilish.

>>431258093
galactus being high curve often fails to draw any combo when korg and rockslide make it very likely to miss a draw. and your alternate playlines are easy to beat. tell me this you insist you always KNOW when leader is coming and like a child still refuse to acknowledge beign wrong about spider-man vs leader.

Tell me this, would you admit that doc ock pulling down aero doesn't change the fact that aero beats playing galactus? same thing with leader. If tournament players were so afraid of your specific list that always bombs out in tournament then the ZABU deck would ahve shang chi and shuri destroyer shit always loses.

>>431258608
Wow that's a lot of work when I can just slap sunspot down and float.

>>431259249
you realize that that drains mana you could spend on cards, at a quite inefficient rate I might add

Cyclops needed a nerf yesterday. Wtf is this card

>>431259010
Everything wrong once again.
>tell me this you insist you always KNOW when leader is coming and like a child still refuse to acknowledge beign wrong about spider-man vs leader.
You can play around Leader. The only way Leader beats Spiderman is the time when no reasonable player would have played Spiderman. The deck has a single way of getting Leader on turn 5.
>pulling down aero doesn't change the fact that aero beats playing galactus? same thing with leader.
Completely different with Leader, i explained in length why. Aero wrecks Galactus, Leader doesn't.
We aren't afraid about Galactus in tournaments for various reasons, the biggest being that (a) a single direct counter shits on him (Debri/Aero etc). (b) Two or more indirect counters give you a favorable match up (e.g. Polaris+Cosmo). No, Leader isn't one. (c) Because of (a) and (b), there's hardly any Galactus in tournaments.
>If tournament players were so afraid of your specific list
They aren't afraid, because of (c). I can assure you we shit ourselves when we play a deck without counters and Galactus shows up. I won a tournament that way, beating two Deathwaves that had no Aero. They had Wave, Leader AND Death, and they were hopeless. Meanwhile you're trying to argue that your Wave+Leader is enough kek.
>ZABU deck would have shang chi and shuri destroyer shit always loses
Yea but there's not room for everything. Then you lose to Patriot or Monkey or whatever. That's the thing with tournaments, the counters and amount of greediness of the deck are difficult to figure out and there's always holes in your strategy. You hope you guessed the meta correctly and you hope you get a bit lucky with matchups. Because of (c), you prefer to counters to other decks first. Of course this might change if Galactus becomes prominent in tournaments.
It is obvious that you don't have much experience with competitive play.
I have to go to bed now, i might answer more tomorrow.

how the hell are you two still on this fucking leader thing

>>431260565
>1 energy for 2 power is too much!
retard

>>431259548
Still better then the enemy dumping the perfect setup there and having a brick that does nothing there

nebula is the reason I have to run killmonger, kitty is less annoying because when I lose to kitty its the monkey and mysterio shit that piss me off more than the kitty. nebula way more toxic 1 drop

1000 points away from 6k. Should I get HE or Thanos?

>>431264161
Honestly I'd say Thanos. Now that HE is out and people have been fucking around with him, he's a very linear deck. While Thanos allows a lot of experimentation and different kind of decks.

>>431264161
do you play with sound on? thanos says cool voicelines before every game and when you proc the power stone

>>431260917
He's fucking retarded, why can he go off every turn

Where the fuck is the hearthstone thread, why does this one show up?

>>431264161
you can build multiple different deck types around thanos

>>431268738
no one bumped the last one when there was a surge of new threads being made on /vg/ so it died, the anon that makes new threads isn't awake

>>431269128
Oh shit is that guy spaming threads again? We died last time cause of that.

can I get 300 tokens with 400 gold.

>>431271220
>>431269128
Yup the spammer is back, slower threads are getting killed. Quick someone start an autistic ass argument before the same happens to us.
>>431268508
>>431271292
>>431271135
>>431268427
>>431270617
>>431270260
>>431267059
>>431266508
>>431266352
>>431266176
>>431271581

File: marvel_snap-1.jpg (59 KB, 1070x470)

59 KB JPG

>>431268738
We have hearthstone in the OP because of Ben Brode.
tbf /hsg/ also has the word "snap" somewhere in its OP because it'll come up when I'm looking for this thread.

/hsg/ and /snap/ are bound together.

>>431271362
On a token Tuesday maybe

>>431260935
Nebula was busted but is hard countered by kitty and HE decks. She was amazing until the meta shifted to constant bounce and debuff spamming.

I just noticed Iceman has 700 variants. Only 1200, which sucks ass because I'd maybe have bought a 700 but not a 1200.

>>431273583
*doesn't have 700 variants

File: Screenshot_20230526_09073(...).jpg (61 KB, 435x530)

61 KB JPG

FUCK YEAH BACK TO 70 AFTER DROPPING 4 RANKS A WEEK AGO

LETS GOOOOOO

>>431274165
LET'S FUCKING GOOOOOOOOOO

File: 1595775401972.png (8 KB, 271x288)

8 KB PNG

>galactus on the shop
should I...

>>431274665
If you don't mind literally EVERYONE hating you and wanting you dead.
Then yeah sure he's kinda fun.

>>431274665
He's probably getting reworked next month

>>431274665
Play wolverine t2, electro t3 and get +1.

>>431275226
>He's probably getting reworked next month
Right. Fuck him then

File: 1668894116214332.png (489 KB, 683x459)

489 KB PNG

This list is pretty solid, I think. I'm just really sucks at snapping especially on infinite. Probably gonna drop Enchantress with something else since opponent's Luke only matters if you still have Abomination in hand.

>>431274665
well, do you like people roping you because they hate you?

>>431276223
Go with Rogue. Enchantress is only better if you're also running Zabu

>Missed Hela Gardening
Fucking hell I'm sad now

>>431276651
Maybe next Earth day.

>>431278110
>implying the game will still be alive by then
Lmao

>>431280627
anon Ive faced disappointment from every single live service game to come out
seeing how they handled the high ev fuck up and how much better the card acquisition has gotten consistently I trust this game to be good for a long long time

>>431280627
They're making money hand over fist, it'll probably be around.

>>431280627
Whales are making the game alive
Other cards games, like Gwent, didn't had the privilege of that

Why do keep releasing literal who comic book characters like high evolutionary? When are we going to get real comic book characters like superman and the joker?

>pixel rocket for mystery bundle
Thanks Ben

>no one is running cosmo
what happen?

>>431287478
Luke Cage is currently more important to run

Just spent tokens on master mold
probably going to regret it if they keep adding cards like nebula and jeff that are just upgrades on older ones but I want to have as many types of deck playable as possible

Unpin stature for iron lad?

>>431289261
Stature is useless now. Don't even bother.

>>431287478
I've seen darkhawk decks run it

>>431289191
actually this sera control deck with him is pretty decent

File: uhh.jpg (1.94 MB, 1080x2220)

1.94 MB JPG

hows this for some bullshit boys?
feel like such a cunt playing it but damn does it close out 2 cubers no problem

File: abom.png (554 KB, 525x594)

554 KB PNG

Why was my opponent able to play Abomination on 4?

>>431292660
I like the idea. I'd steal it if I had Jeff.

>>431293689
jeff is honestly just back up, a lot of the cards here are like daredevil and misty knight

other options I could see played in here are chavez for better odds at drawing a storm/spiderman + absorbing man combo, Kang for snap bluff wins, abomination and wasp to force out lukes and make sure your enchantress is landing, or just a classic shang chi

Protip: The best HE deck doesn't use half of the cards. The affliction ones, specifically.

>>431295017
That's literally 4 of the 7 cards. Then misty knight is painfully average and shocker is a worse zabu. I'm down to just shove HE and hulk into a deck though.

>>431292660
-Enchantress, Misty Knight, Absorbing Man
+Armor, Wasp, Hulk

Is miles still bugged with moon girl? Like if you copy miles and move a card on the same turn the copied miles doesn't get cost reduction.

>>431295797
The only Affliction card worth using is Cyclops, just to enable Abomination.

>>431297342
Wasp is literally a 0/3 so she's good too

>>431297342
The thing and wasp are both overtuned at 0/3 and 4/9. Just having cyclops isn't enough to enable abom. If they have luke cage they have luke cage you just deal with it.

On another note, I think the best HE deck should have wave in it. That card is fucking busted.

>>431297474
>>431298193
There's just too much Luke Cage around in the current meta to make it worth while. I think it's a waste to have to run anti-Luke shit. I've had way more success focusing on big stats + unspent energy with cards like She-Hulk and Magick etc. Small sample size though.

>>431298607
It's a self correcting thing, the more people run Luke Cage, the more people will shift to energy saving versions of HE, the more people will take Luke Cage out of their deck
Wasp and Cyclops will be autoincludes in any HE deck eventually

>>431298781
Definitely agreed on the Affliction style being more likely to be the best version down the line. Just too much Luke to justify it right now, for me.

File: 1664721022756169.jpg (64 KB, 743x860)

64 KB JPG

>HE
>HE
>galactus
>HE/thanos
>galactus
>destroybot
>HE/thanos

File: highevo.png (886 KB, 904x500)

886 KB PNG

>>431298607
This is what I've been running so far. There's multiple wincons so putting afflict in it doesn't matter that much.

>>431298998
+4
+4
-1
+-1
-1
-1
+-1

>>431287478
Low power cards you playewrly as a liability into cyclops now. And he doesn't stop hulk or abom. So he's doing almost nothing.

>>431289191
Molds pretty good against combo decks. He'll jam up their hand so they don't get to draw their pieces

>>431292660
High evo does nothing in that build. There's way stronger things lockdown cam be doing. Maximo and even ebony maw are better for locking lanes and winning them.

>>431298607
Magick is a totally fucking trap. Unless you're dependant on 6 drops you're making your list way more vulnerable by playing it. Every top deck can vomit power on the last turn so 6 and 7 are basically the same. And getting the lane stormed because your opponent knows you're not going all in fucks you so damn hard. If you can't win on 6 it's unlikely you can win on 7 with 1 more card. Death plus Krull is basically the only reason to use her. Other wise you're unlikely to be getting real value from the extra turn. You wasted your turn 5 on a weak card to get a turn 7 when you could have just played a better 5 drop and impacted the board more.

>>431300037
Magick can give you a turn 7 of like, Hulk, She-Hulk and Abomination and maybe even another card if you're lucky. There are no other decks shitting out 45+ power on turn 7 right now with that level of versatility in where the power is placed.

>>431289191
The problem with mold/ronan is that there's just not enough cards in the archetype yet
needs another win condition and more ways to add stuff to hand

>>431300037
All wrong except for mold lmao

>>431300473
also ronan being a 5 whilst skillhawk is a 4 isn't great

>>431300192
Then you're skipping your 6 and handicapping your 5 to do that. When you could play both turns out for a similar result with say dark hawk, moon girl and 2 shehulks or mystique.

>>431300805
>Yeah but you could be playing something else
well done mate. you're really big brains for that comment.

>>431300897
That's the point. You're putting your game at risk of storm to do something about as powerful as you could do without it.

>>431300995
>how can we make the best cake?
>mate just have a burger you fucking retard loooool

>>431282159
the joker is allreader here bro. is the 3/-3

>>431296967
wasp and armor dont do anything, enchantress wins you games against luke cage, absorbing man is literally a key part of this games lockdown
hulk is decent but its rare to even get to play him considering how much youre forcing retreats

>>431300037
cyclopse is very efficient mana usage, after storm hes like a second nebula and the turns after you get play your cards off curve but still generating value, misty knight and sunspot add to that giving you more flexibility in your aggro over just locking yourself out of locations with ebony maw or praying maximus is enough

File: hec.png (303 KB, 484x294)

303 KB PNG

>>431302018
I went from 100 to 110 easily with this, my experience was very different.
-Armor,Shocker for The Thing, Abomination also worked very well.

>>431302018
Also you understand you play a vanilla 4/4 just for an evolved cyclops and misty knight right? better just play a maximus, JJ and a lizard.
If you use HE you should put at least 3-4 cards that combine to have an important effect.

File: Screenshot_20230526_15515(...).jpg (2.63 MB, 1440x3088)

2.63 MB JPG

Fuck brodes asshole.

>>431273583
There's this bundle coming up if you like the variants:

https://snap.fan/bundles/BundleMarvelsVoicesPride/

>>431302969
I ain't buying no fag shit

File: Screenshot_20230526-093012.png (993 KB, 1080x1920)

993 KB PNG

>pool 3 complete

There is something deflating now that the only cards you get from here on are the SP, whatever shitty cards they drop and maybe one new S5/4 a month.

They really need to up the amount of cards they release, there should be like 10+ card releases a month, half of them directly into pool 3 or they need to do an occasional expansion where they inject 20-30 new cards. They said that they want to support this game for 10+ years but we're in year 2 and there's almost no growth already and longtime players are losing interest.

>>431301051
When you know someone is trying to smash your food with a sledge hammer you make a quick burger and gtfo instead of fucking around twice as long to make a cake yes.

>>431302969
Might kill the game with all the fag shit getting boycotted this year lol.

>>431305725
>When you know someone is trying to smash your food with a sledge hammer you make a quick burger and gtfo instead of fucking around twice as long to make a cake yes.
??????????????????

>>431305761
What he actually meant was:
When you know your wife's gonna peg your ass with a strap-on you put on some lube real quick and get fucked twice instead of putting on a condom yes.

Does the double booster location have a chance to proc normally or was it event-only?

I managed to not buy the season pass and now I just did.

There are no good thanos decks. I've tried everything. The decks he's in you might as well play without him

>>431305219
>yugioh player has entered the chat

>>431311785
he's excellent with anything lockjaw + other big bodies. mind stone and time stone are the greatest lockjaw fodder in the game. space stone allows you to free up more room for lockjaw. can run killmonger versions with death, or buff versions with okoye, nakia, captain marvel. swarm versions with kazar blue marvel onslaught are less strong in current evolutionary "meta." all versions run 3+ 6 drops

>>431298867
affliction only works when you opponent is filling the board before you. even without luke cage affliction HE will only be good in a junk style list. It's bad matchups in bounce and destroy cards were already common.

File: Untitled.png (1.22 MB, 760x1042)

1.22 MB PNG

>>431311785
>>431312042
here's some visual examples. just stay away from jubilee; you may be tempted to run her if you have infinaut giganto stuff. but she is a jebait even with zabu. you don't need her

who else in low priority queue?

I face the same 4 people every game now.

Guess this is what you get for running the clock on every turn vs galactus players.

File: what the.png (402 KB, 588x574)

402 KB PNG

Fuck you

File: eac463ba4c025378cbd37c62f(...).jpg (463 KB, 793x514)

463 KB JPG

>>431313626

File: Wave_move.png (857 KB, 904x500)

857 KB PNG

>wave + 2 cost turn 5
>aero or heimdall turn 6
Pretty much a rip off from the sandman move deck.

MARVEL SNAP IS A CARD COLLECTING GAME

DESIGNED ONLY TO JEW SHEKELS FROM YOUR ACCOUNT

THIS GAME WAS NOT DESIGNED TO BE FUN

THIS GAME WAS NOT DESIGNED TO BE ENJOYED

THIS GAME WAS NOT DESIGNED TO PROVIDE A MEANS BY WHICH YOU COULD PLAY A TCG VERSUS ANOTHER HUMAN BEING.

THIS GAME IS DESIGNED TO CREATE CONDITIONS THAT WILL DRIVE YOU TO MAKE EMOTIONAL PURCHASES

THIS GAME IS DESIGNED TO BEAT YOU IN THE MOST FRUSTRATING WAY POSSIBLE ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU HAVE CURRENCY ON YOUR ACCOUNT

THIS GAME IS DESIGNED TO FOOL YOU INTO THINKING BOTS ARE OTHER HUMAN BEINGS

THIS GAME FUCKING CHARGES $100 FOR A CARD

$100 FOR A FUCKING CARD

$100

FOR

A

FUCKING

CARD

WHY ARE YOU WASTING YOUR TIME?

WHY ARE YOU WASTING YOUR TIME?

WHY ARE YOU WASTING YOUR TIME?

WHY ARE YOU WASTING YOUR TIME?

>>431313087
These look good thank you. I'm going to have to make some space in my decks. I have like 5 decks right now I'm testing.

>>431315836
i play it while i'm having a poo mate

>>431316252
>le ebin contrarain mayme kekl0rz

https://youtu.be/HwGk6RyDJhQ?t=417
deck-based matchmaking btw

>>431317598
Wtf is that fake laugh? Fuck this fag.

File: Screenshot_20230526-122951.jpg (1.08 MB, 1080x2340)

1.08 MB JPG

Muh dick bro

>>431318653
jacinto is the only good variant for wing

>>431318653
I hate when they make in-house variants 1200.

>>431223194
hearthstone is worse

>have yet to see crystal or shanna once after their 'buffs'

bought a new mobile phone and installed marvel snap on it but this little shit won't show my old progression even tho it's linked with same google account as my tablet and steam

Any reason to not open a reserve and save it? I'm pool 3 complete and I've still been getting cards through them but I've seen some people save them up.

>>431320587
The other day I ran into a guy using shanna with dazzler and debrii and shit to fill up both boards but thanks to location fuckery I happened to put a cosmo in every lane so it didn't work.

>>431315836
just play kang. who care if the game is rigged.

>>431321183
>you can get the newly dropped series 3 cards on the day
>potential events like the holiday variants
>they might change the reserve system one day, so might as well save it if you don't need tokens atm

>>431321183
The reason to save boosters is to wait for series drops and get all the dropped cards at once. You also don't want to open a S4 that could potentially drop the next month. Previously people also saved them for variant rushes but they said there wouldn't be anymore going forward. If you need gold or collectors tokens feel free to open them but once your pool 3 complete there's no reason to not save them if they decide to change things in the future again.

Galactus should be removed from the game until the rework.

Jeff should be a 2/2

Cyclops and wasp need nerfing. They offer too much value for their play cost. Thing should hit 2 times not 3.

Nebula needs to get 1 a turn but have 2 power to begin with.

Kitty needs to gain 1 per bounce and start at 2 power.

Armour should protect your cards from minus power as well as destroy effects and it should stop galactus from destroying the lane.

Storm is a nigger.

That's how we fix this meta.

File: The Invincible Iron Man.jpg (768 KB, 1821x2800)

768 KB JPG

What is your favorite Marvel comics, bros?

>>431324116
I've never read a single marvel comic in my life

>>431321183
only reason is to get the cards asap when they drop to series 3 but you can just save credits for that

>>431324116
nextwave

File: OIKaynq.jpg (538 KB, 975x1500)

538 KB JPG

>>431324116
practically 90% of the comics the greatest card in the game is in

Since wave has completely replaced sandman they should just rework sandman to do something more interesting.

>>431325298
Keep telling ya, he should increase all cards cost by 1, 5/4.

File: i-know-punisher-has-done-(...).png (651 KB, 640x962)

651 KB PNG

>>431324116
Punisher v1-v3, Punisher War Zone v1, Punisher War Journal v1, Ennis Punisher

>>431325298
fuck the devs for ruining the healthiest meta the game ever saw. and they are so behind blackbolt got nerfed after he stopped being meta, just because they hate him.

File: 63-4.jpg (1.09 MB, 1821x2800)

1.09 MB JPG

>>431325750
Miss 90s comic cover art

>>431325298
3/3: On turn 6, both players can play only one card.

>>431325808
he was still meta, just because people are playing with HE doesn't mean he is not good anymore

>>431327498
That's just Wave again

>>431327876
he stopped being meta when kitty pryde dropped and wave completely shutting his deck down. HE had nothing to do with it. Bounce decks put more power into play so stature wasn't competitive.

File: Screenshot_2023-05-26-13-(...).jpg (1.33 MB, 1080x2340)

1.33 MB JPG

do i pull the trigger

>>431328242
No bro he's going down to pool 3 next month :)

File: ego.png (2.41 MB, 868x1614)

2.41 MB PNG

Why the fuck would you retreat t1 on an ego game in infinite?

>>431328242
Why not? Even if he does drop down to p3 it's gonna be a few weeks so you should be able to recoup most of the tokens by then

>>431328110
if that's the case, this is just another late nerf by SD, where they are looking at outdated data

>>431328325
Because it's boring

>>431328325
"I am Ego, this is my domain. Escaped!"

>>431328456
>we decided black bolt's day in the sun was over
they just don't want him to ever be played. acting as if discarding the lowest cost card isn't irrelevant in 99% of cases. he was played in just 1 deck after being a meme the whole rest of the games lifespan and got nerfed.

>>431327907
wave shoot downs jeff.

Black Bolt
4/6
On reveal: Discards the next card drawn by the opponent.

>>431328325
I do that when they snap on me just to ruin their stupid little meme, followed by "snap?" x3 +ms marvel

>>431328864
>they just don't want him to ever be played.
at that point just remove him from the game or rework him, if it wasn't black bolf, moon knight would have been the next best card to combo with stature, now stature is not much better than just running Titania and dropping her turn 6

>>431328864
but why? they allow sera dispite her being a non pool 4-5 card to alwaya be strong. do they just hate the character or something.

>>431329158
that shit is even more cancer

>>431329348
the basically say the same thing about crystal every time too. thinking it would be terrible for the game if the cards were useful. maybe they do just hate the inhumans.

Some people are really bad at this game.
>Turn 4 they play Galactus without snapping
>Turn 5 they play Spider-Man without snapping
>Emote Snap? To them knowing I'm going to rope them
>They snap and emote Snap?
>Still just rope them with the Kamala emote
I wish there was a "nice 1 cube* emote.

>>431329680
there is a posibilty there is a mandate on inhuman characters being bad. like marvel doesn't want to have anything with inhumans. the only good inhuman card is doggo

>>431325298
Why do people say this? She only does it for one turn

>>431245559
How broken would Thanos be if mind stone always started in your hand?

>>431329983
If jonah jameson card lets you mock players, it's a day1 buy.

>>431330317
Because wave doesn't limit you to playing a card per turn until t6. Which means she can be slotted into way more decks than sandman. So she's replaced sandman's position in the meta as the counter to bounce and sera decks.