>Ok, Margo, for this shot, the camera is going to right at your feet. >Yes, I know it's weird, but it's the artistic vision of the movie, I assure you.>We need you to walk into scene, take your shoes off, and then stand on your tiptoes.>I know, it will drive internet nerds crazy, but they'll be the only ones who say anything, I promise!
>>185459439>implying it wasn’t Margot who insisted on showed her feets
>>185459518Sure as hell seems like she likes to at any chance she can get.
It's not weird it's just a joke about how the barbies feet were made
>>185459549Yeah, feet are funny. Haha.t. Dan Schneider
She has nice feet for what it's worth.
>>185459549Focusing the camera that close on feet is always weird.
Do you think Greta licked them? As a joke, of course.
>>185459439Also 3 seconds in you can clearly see her left foot isn't pointed. Falsehoods and lies as well as dishonest filmmaking.
>>185459653Would you lick them, as a joke?
>>185459439Margot personally paid for this movie to be made. Look up luckychap
>>185459695Lick maybe not, but a quick kiss sure
>>185459637Very much so.
>>185459439>>185459600Moviemaking in the modern era must be AIDS. Imagine you compromise your creative vision because of what some terminally online normalfags will say
>>185459695I would lick every square inch of her entire body, feet included.
>>185459725I doubt anyone is letting 4chan influence their filmmaking.
>>185459761Thinking more about Twitter
>>185459711>>185459740I wouldn't lick most of her body, honestly. Definitely not her mouth, genitalia or anus, those parts are simply no-go gross zones.
>>185459767That much is probably true.
>>185459777Waste of trips.
>>185459695As a joke? yeah haha why not? Nothing wrong with a bit of tomfoolery.
>>185459549Take your meds.
>>185459805Those are filthy and unclean parts, I would not want to lick them.
>>185459862Not on a girl like Margot.
>>185459439it's because that's how the doll's feet look
Look, here's the thing ... I not going to watch BarbieI know ... uhh ... it's just that, I'm not gonna watch it!HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>185459894Not on any girl.
>>185459862Even if she was fresh out of the shower and squeaky clean?
>>185459925Yes. They're not just unclean in a physical sense but in a spiritual sense as well.
>>185459948What if she was a virgin, anon?
>>185459915MOM'S GONNA FREAK
>>185460039She's not, obviously.But if she was, those parts are still unclean, though her genitalia would be slightly less so.
>>185460104You're a funny guy, anon.
>>185460169He's not a cunning linguist, that's for sure.
>>185459439anime is already years ahead on this innovationhttps://youtu.be/JbN_jbimlyo?t=45
>>185459439its just establishing her characters hyperfemininity in an interesting and funny way
>>185459600the OP scene actually looks pretty normal and not forced if you have context, this other scene however
WTF I like Barbie now