[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.




File: Star Trek.jpg (249 KB, 920x840)
249 KB
249 KB JPG
1966-2005 edition

>>170004014
>>
File: bridge.png (628 KB, 1139x783)
628 KB
628 KB PNG
Why is it all so fucking tiresome?
>>
>>170018368
This seems to be missing a bunch of images
>>
File: Kirk.gif (751 KB, 375x282)
751 KB
751 KB GIF
>>170018453
It's fine. Only from 66-05.
>>
>>170018368
What's the best verbal rape Picard has ever delivered?
I loved when he destroyed admiral Satie, but also when he destroyed commander Maddox
>>
>>170018453
No. It features all Star Trek shows.
>>
>>170018534
telling Will that he doesn't deserve to wear that uniform
>>
File: Screenshot (204).jpg (217 KB, 1899x777)
217 KB
217 KB JPG
>>
>>170018410
You get the fun you make. Me? I try to build bridges.
>>
Green shirt kirk irrationally irritates me. Like I feel his power-level is reduced in that hideous garment
>>
>>170018558
It's missing the Star Trek shows DISCO, PIC, PRO, LD and SNW
>>
>>170018558
It is clearly missing a number of Star Trek shows
>>
>>170018608
That can't be right.
>>
File: shush.png (394 KB, 550x555)
394 KB
394 KB PNG
>>170018608
>DISCO, PIC,
>>
>>170018410
>>170018581
Off-topic. Fuck off.
>>
>>170018608
Sorry, this is not the fanfic thread
>>
File: Archer tos.jpg (56 KB, 1010x568)
56 KB
56 KB JPG
>>170018604
>Green shirt kirk irrationally irritates me.
It's based.
>>
>>170018604
It's like Picard with the leather shouldered jacket
>>
File: 3245235y.jpg (51 KB, 600x454)
51 KB
51 KB JPG
>>170018558
>>170018641
>>170018645
>>
>>170018608
None of these are Star Trek shows. Plus, I never heard of this "DISCO" thing in the first place.

There are some honorary Star Trek shows, though. SG-1, SeaQuest, Babylon 5... Maybe you meant one of those.
>>
>>170018368
I love The Wright Stuff pioneer angle of Enterprise also the lore building with other races. Actually I just love Enterprise. Could have been better but god has Canadian Star Trek made it look phenomenal.
>>
>>170018697
I've always found that jacket stupid
Also, the voyager uniform is the ugliest one from the tng era
>>
>>170018368
Do you think one day we'll get a seventh entry?
>>
>>170018604
The uglier the garment the more powerful he grows.
>>
>>170018410
Lack of vitamin D in space.
>>
File: 469213794.png (512 KB, 863x785)
512 KB
512 KB PNG
>>170018641
Nu Trek forever in your head.

RENT FREE

t. Captain Angel I'll be back
>>
>>170018802
Actually I forget it very easily.
>>
>>170018802
>I can't stop mentioning it
>but you're obsessed about it!!!
OK, schizo.
>>
>>170018796
I think it's more likely that we'll get star trek in real life (after the whole war and unrest debacle) than have another proper show made
>>
The only series I have on display, because they’re the only ones I regularly rewatch.
>>
>>170018754
>None of these are Star Trek shows.
The owners of Star Trek say they're Star Trek. So they're Star Trek.
>>
>>170018534
I personally like the "Mutiny, on a Federation starship, that's shocking. It's unthinkable. And yet you've never mentioned it" bit with Riker in The Pegasus. It's not overly dramatic, it's not a monologue defending some point of ethics, it's just a Captain being mad as hell he's being railroaded by the officers ranking above and below him, and in the next scene the mad Admiral wants to take the whole fucking Enterprise into the asteroid.
>>
>>170018907
Star Trek is a state of mind.
>>
>>170018886
>Has the ship from Star Trek: Lower Decks

based
>>
>>170018368
Is the cartoon good?
>>
File: chuckles.png (525 KB, 1009x792)
525 KB
525 KB PNG
>>170018845
It's more of a switch I get to flip in your head to get my (You)s
>>
>>170018944
all three cartoons are good
>>
>>170018907
I don't care what your owners say.
>>
>>170018944
It's good fun...
>>
>>170018931
It’s a damn pretty design in a damn pretty color scheme.
>>
>>170018907
You can say an apple is an orange, but words have meaning and an apple will always be an apple and not an orange, no matter what label you slap on it.
>>
>>170018965
>I'm not obsessed you are!
OK, schizo.
>>
>>170018974
They own the brand. They make the rules. Make a bootleg Star Trek like Seth did and then you can lay down your rules.
>>
File: gasp.png (570 KB, 1063x793)
570 KB
570 KB PNG
>>170019015
I guess my (You)s were so delicious you want more?
>>
>>170018907
Deckard is not a replicant
It's pronounced gif, not jif
Captain Amelia does not have a cock
When the owners get corrupted their words lose all meaning and weight
>>
>>170019053
Ah yes, word pronunciation, famous sign of corruption.
>>
>>170018754
>Claiming Star Trek shows aren't Star Trek
>while one of the shows in the OP isn't even called Star Trek
>>
File: snw green shirt.jpg (51 KB, 574x634)
51 KB
51 KB JPG
>>170018604
>>170018697
>>170018761
>>170018798
SNW ruined the green shirt. It's supposed to be a little more tight fitting and they made Pike wear a black shirt underneath. It's wrong.
>>
>>170018558
It's only missing lower decks the rest is fine
>>
>>170019053
>Deckard is not a replicant
He is.
>It's pronounced gif, not jif
Incorrect, but who cares about pronunciation?
>Captain Amelia does not have a cock
She does.
>>
>>170018604
IT'S CALLED A COMMAND WRAP
>>
>>170019101
>Claiming Star Trek shows aren't Star Trek
???
>>
File: Spock Kirk lol.jpg (67 KB, 650x450)
67 KB
67 KB JPG
>>170018802
>Jim, did I ever tell you about Captain Angel? "They" were a hilariously incompetent space pirate, a fine piece of enby ass from a more civilized age. She had the tightest body and the perkiest little breasts in the galaxy; barely legal in most systems. Captain Pike and I used to doubleteam her at the end of every plot of hers we thwarted during our last five-year mission, and once in a while we’d even have the entire crew run a train over her, part of official Starfleet "discipline" of course. In time, she learned how to handle a meatphaser better than any girl on the ship. She wore a skintight bodysuit every day so we told her there were no panties in space, and since she was constantly crawling up jefferies tubes you’d get a glimpse of her pink bussy mid fight as she'd be escorted to the bridge for her latest punishment. It was surreal. We taught her to grip her weapon backwards like a dildo and she constantly got captured by Klingon pirates and Orion slavers almost every other day. It was ridiculous, like a constant porno, Jim, you have no idea. And she was a good friend.
>>
File: Enterprise-Opening.jpg (113 KB, 850x480)
113 KB
113 KB JPG
>>170019101
>while one of the shows in the OP isn't even called Star Trek
Better luck next time.
>>
>>170019136
t. corporate bootlicker
>>
>>170019106
It was tight fitting on Kirk because Shatner is a fattie.
>>
File: 456456367.jpg (46 KB, 1280x720)
46 KB
46 KB JPG
>>170019167
>posted edited images

c'mon son
>>
>>170019167
>Only called Star Trek after Enterprise flopped for the first two seasons.
Not Star Trek. If you're ashamed to be called a Star Trek show then you don't get to be a Trek show even when you come crawling back.
>>
>>170019208
Why are you lying? He didn't edit that image. I'll never believe your words ever again.
>>
>>170018944
It's for children and it wasn't even good at that because nobody actually ever watched it
>>
File: 1655570074762.jpg (143 KB, 1504x956)
143 KB
143 KB JPG
>>170019160
>Captain Pike and I used to doubleteam her at the end of every plot of hers we thwarted during our last five-year mission, and once in a while we’d even have the entire crew run a train over her, part of official Starfleet "discipline" of course.
Thanks, that was a beautiful read!
>>
>>170018410
Spock generally finds things tiresome. Autists usually do.
>>
>>
File: Not this shit again.webm (518 KB, 880x720)
518 KB
518 KB WEBM
>>170019208
>>170019227
All I hear is excuses. Smallville had the same argument. It was still a Superman show. Have some faith.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=urYH6xEyXw0&t=9s
>>
>>170019180
He was no more a fattie than Peck and Mount.
>>
File: 1655973257492.jpg (301 KB, 1269x1076)
301 KB
301 KB JPG
wHy ArE yOu NoT wAtChiNG thE BoREviLLe, /nuTreK/???
>>
>>170019167
to be fair they did drop the star trek from ENT title at first.
>>
>>170019405
Who cares about either those pieces of shit?
>>
File: 1655976699221.jpg (202 KB, 1853x1508)
202 KB
202 KB JPG
*short pause*
SKREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEONK
>>
>>170019405
What are you trying to prove here? That both of these shows are semi-popular?
>>
>>170019331
It worked for Smallville. It didn't work for Enterprise. Enterprise lacked faith in Star Trek, and deserves to be punished because of that.
>>
File: SNW vs ORV.png (279 KB, 625x629)
279 KB
279 KB PNG
>>170019476
Based
>>
File: kirk green1.jpg (53 KB, 602x452)
53 KB
53 KB JPG
>>170019333
>>170019180
>It was tight fitting on Kirk because Shatner is a fattie.
From what I have seen Shatner was fine. Think of the green shirt like gym gear. It's meant to be light and easy to remove.
>>
>>170018608
Nu trek isn't Trek. It isn't cannon.
>>
>>170018754
Oh its STD
>>
File: 1655515316976.jpg (1.47 MB, 1865x1453)
1.47 MB
1.47 MB JPG
>>170019595
>it is another episode of a fucking /pol/tard feeling clever because some image gives him security there is some semitic plot going on

Real glad there are images to empower retards. The internet is a beautiful thing. What God used to give people in the past, now can be done with a few infographics that exactly blame a common enemy for all your problems.
>>
>>170018368
> Brand new episode of the hit series Star Trek: Strange New Worlds
> CG proceeds to troll and spam /trek/.

Must you always?
>>
>>170019758
Why do you think the NuTrek simp came here from /pol/?
>>
>>170019770
>CG
Computer-generated?
>>
File: kek.png (237 KB, 371x379)
237 KB
237 KB PNG
>hour old thread
>80 posts
>23 ips
>>
>>170019817
Yes. I hate the new special effects. New stuff suck!
>>
File: 8250-Orap-Pimozide-2-Mg.jpg (74 KB, 817x1200)
74 KB
74 KB JPG
>>170018802
ask your doctor about taking this
>>
>tfw postan hapi giger neex =>^_^<=
>>
File: unnamed_7228.jpg (247 KB, 640x964)
247 KB
247 KB JPG
>>170019877
Psycho Poster
Qu'est-ce que c'est?
>>
>>170019877
/swg/ is killing /trek/.
>>
File: dog.png (727 KB, 995x795)
727 KB
727 KB PNG
>La'an dog mum starts to sing
>>
File: ST Emmys.jpg (312 KB, 815x685)
312 KB
312 KB JPG
In Trek News, it's Emmy nomination time:

https://www.goldderby.com/article/2022/star-trek-emmy-submissions-discovery-picard/
>>
>>170020078
She's surprisingly based.
>>
>>170019914
And why would I need to?
>>
>>170019248
All of Star Trek is for children
>>
>>170019208
Such a good font. Miss that show so dam much
>>
>>170020172
That's star wars
Children find star trek boring
>>
>>170020157
Because you're a tranny
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8839957/
>>
File: 1652734913735.png (288 KB, 500x370)
288 KB
288 KB PNG
>>170018802
So it was a tranny the whole time?
Wowowo I wonder what it looks like without all the cameras and makeup and angles.
I was honestly fooled, bros.
>>
>>170020212
Kids nowadays find Star Wars boring too.
>>
>>170019522
>Enterprise lacked faith in Star Trek
Exactly the opposite. ENT dropped the title at first cuz they figured at that point people would recognise the name "Enterprise" alone as Star Trek.
>>
File: Hills.jpg (11 KB, 226x223)
11 KB
11 KB JPG
>>170020266
Indeed, fr fr. It is not bussin. There is in fact cap.
>>
Great episode
>>
>>170020281
Enterprise dropped the title in an attempt to get people who thought of Trek as "nerd shit" to watch the show. That's why it had stuff like the decontamination gel.
>>
>>170020356
Forgot link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-ywkuT84KQ
>>
>>170018754
Also Orville
>>
Imagine thinking TNG, DS9, VOY, and ENT are "Old Trek."
>>
File: huntress.png (2.23 MB, 1920x800)
2.23 MB
2.23 MB PNG
>>170020109
For me it was the Huntress.
>>
>>170020408
>Disneyshit
>Real Trek
Kill yourself.
>>
>>170020218
No, I am an ally. I will never change my body but empower all trans*people by being supportive of them because it makes you so fucking mad xd. Why don't you 42% yourself, poltard?
>>
>>170019008
>You can say an apple is an orange
Sub 50 IQ on display.

If God says an apple is an orange, then an apple is an orange. Paramount/CBS is the god of Star Trek. If they say X is Star Trek, then X is Star Trek.
>>
>>170020447
Those actually upended Roddenberry's vision
>>
>>170020455
We were talking about honorary Treks
>>
>>170020506
Took you one hour to come up with that?
>>
>>170018368
The latest ep was sweet
ENT sucked btw
>>
>>170020566
>The latest ep was sweet
Agreed
>>
>>170018410
Better than Picard
>>
>>170020585
Pity reply.
>>
>>170019482
They're not. SNW is genuinely popular. The Orville is horrendously unpopular because Seth MacFaglane couldn't ever pick a lane between comedy and Berman-Braga-Behr BoreTrek, and also because he filled the show with faggotry and cuckoldry and Reddit-style fedora atheism.
>>
>>170020078
Voulez vous coucher avec moi et Noel Wells?
>>
>>170020600
SNW is 14th on IMDB while The Orville is 16th. This implies their popularity is fairly similar.
>>
File: Laughing whores.jpg (74 KB, 750x750)
74 KB
74 KB JPG
>>170020600
>SNW is genuinely popular
SNW shills are hilarious
>>
>>170020544
That's my first post of the day, fren. Some of us have jobs and families. I know nobody on the anti-Paramount+ side does, but the rest of us do.

Yes, Paramount has the authority to define what is and is not Star Trek, just as God has the authority to define what is and isn't an apple. I'm sorry you're too autistic to understand these concepts.
>>
>>170020699
It doesn't imply anything, anon. IMDB data is objectively worthless, just like nearly all "user generated" data on the Internet. We already know Disney makes heavy use of bots and click farms.
>>
>>170020774
That's why I use Google Trends. SNW is the worst performing live-action NuTrek series so far.
>>
>>170020508
Yep. TNG/DS9/VOY/ENT was a bad ripoff of TOS/TAS. The Soap Operazation of Star Trek.

The SNW/LOW/PRO line of shows is the bona fide successor to TOS/TAS.
>>
>>170020812
LOL you think there's Google data from the 1960s and 1980s? Holy shit you should kill yourself.
>>
>>170020867
TNG Season One is the purest version of Roddenberry's vision.
>>
>>170020542
Sorry, I'm very dumb. It's because my dads used to rape me all the time when I was a kid. Since then I have trouble with concentrating on anything that's not a big, tasty cock.
>>
>>170020726
>>170020867
Imagine shilling this hard for free
>>
>>170020899
Did your mother drop you on your head when you were a baby?
>>
>>170020703
SNW is a huge critical and commercial success. The Orville has been on the cancellation block for two years. Sad that you live in delusion-land and can't figure that out. Reminds me of "20 down 10 to go."
>>
File: image1-1.jpg (362 KB, 629x892)
362 KB
362 KB JPG
Time for some /trek/ feels.
Which moment from the franchise do you think has the most feels?
Personally, mine is Tasha's funeral. It's the music that does it.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jUzALSFR-_E
>>
>>170020703
Shills aside, how popular is SNW really? Do normies even know it exists?
>>
>>170020905
>TNG Season One is the purest version of Roddenberry's vision.
No, TNG season 1 is Roddenberry after 20 years of huffing his own farts.
>>
>>170020952
>huge critical and commercial success
Nope. >>170020812
>>
>>170020812
>That's why I use Google Trends!!!

Actually, since you're both technologically and mathematically innumerate, the Geeze on twitter you swipe your goggle spam is the one who uses it. You're just a copy cat.
>>
>>170020812
Orville is more popular than Strange New Worlds according to Google Trends. SNWbros...
>>
>>170021005
ESL fingers wrote this post.
>>
File: data 3.png (244 KB, 603x600)
244 KB
244 KB PNG
>>170021005
I don't respond to schizo cope. Data is data.
>>
>>170020965
>Shills aside, how popular is SNW really? Do normies even know it exists?
Why do we care? Star Trek sucks ass when produced for some bonehead mass audience. VOY and ENT are proof of that.
>>
>>170021033
>Why do we care? Star Trek sucks ass when produced for some bonehead mass audience. STD, SPIC, LODE and SNW are proof of that.
ftfy
>>
File: orv-snw.png (58 KB, 1727x914)
58 KB
58 KB PNG
>>170021006
It really is, huh. Would you look at that...
>>
>>170020999
Imagine thinking "Google Trends" is proof of how successful something is. All that matters is how many people pay their $4.99 a month to Paramount+ and then click "Star Trek: Strange New Worlds" once they're in. That's literally the only measure of success in today's tv world.

Enough people are paying their $4.99 to Paramount+ and watching the Kurtzman Star Trek shows that Paramount has gone wild with them, and all are on permanent insta-renewal as a result. That's all that matters, anon.
>>
>>170021084
>United states
>not worldwide
>>
>>170020965
I said to my friend there's a new Star Trek. He said "the one with the black girl?"
no one uses Paramount+
>>
>>170021149
Neither is premiering worldwide so who gives a shit.
>>
>>170021152
>tfw people associate Mikey Spock with NuTrek and not Beckett Mariner
feels bad man
>>
>>170021145
CG is convinced that if he just screams enough they'll take Star Trek off the TV. Meanwhile in reality, half dozen series in production with a new episode a week and a new movie about to start filming.
>>
>>170021084
Imagine thinking meaningless Google data matters. The Orville has been cancelled. Star Trek: Strange New Worlds (and all the other P+ shows) are running along just fine and in no danger of cancellation whatsoever.

Cry about it, grandpa.
>>
>>170021152
>no one uses Paramount+!!!

40 million subscribers. Continue to cope.
>>
>>170021152
>no one uses Paramount+
This. Literally no one subscribes to Paramount+ except employees. The entire thing is a money laundering scheme.
>>
>>170021267
The numbers are all fake. Paramount+ isn't even something I can watch on my TV. No one can.
>>
>>170021234
Whether it matters or not is irrelevant. The point is that SNW is the worst performing live-action NuTrek outing yet.
>>
>>170021304
>the crazy geezer can't even watch streaming services on his shitty 1970s television
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL holy shit you really do live in a basement
>>
>>170021152
I talked with two friends of mine. One likes Star Trek, but hasn't seen everything yet, the other watched everything from TOS to ENT adn even tried SPIC S1 (not STD though) and hated it.
None of them had any clue there's a new Trek show. It's fucking ridiculous.
I've even seen some normies talking about SPIC and LODE (barely, but still). SNW is a non-entity for them. I guess you can say the same about PRO, but that's a kid's show, so whatever, who cares?
>>
>>170021368
>The point is that SNW is the worst performing live-action NuTrek outing yet.
That would be Enterprise, home skillet. Enterprise was so bad it literally killed a broadcast network.
>>
>>170021267
>40 million subscribers.
You mean the T-Mobile subscribers?
>>
File: Untitled.png (64 KB, 1054x875)
64 KB
64 KB PNG
>>170021226
Paramount is a dying company.
>>
>>170021413
"No one I know voted for Nixon"
>>
>someone mentions Paramount+
>MKUltranny having a mental diarrhea again
>>
>>170020542
You're equating The Orville to real Trek. Die.
>>
>>170021450
We have actual viewing figures for Enterprise. I would say that it was probably still more popular than any NuTrek show.

NuTrek is still locked behind a streaming service no one uses.
>>
>>170021493
>someone said something decades ago
OK
>>
>>170021477
Yeah remember when Coca-Cola failed? That was such a shame.
>>
>>170021503
yeah, being this batshit about someone saying a streaming service isn't popular is odd to say the least
>>
>>170021463
Stop pointing this out, Crazy Geezer!!!
>>
>>170021540
>not understanding the reference
lol

sad
>>
>>170021556
Paramount is relentlessly declining with no sign of reversal.
>>
>>170021520
>NuTrek is still locked behind a streaming service no one uses.
40 million subscribers all watch it.
>>
>>170021591
>B-B-BUT SOMEONE SAID SOMETHING!!!
OK?
>>
>>170021610
>>
>>170021561
Many anons like to laugh at crazy autistics who claim that things they don't like are unpopular simply because they don't like them. It's Chris-Chan-tier autism. If Paramount+ had brick and mortar stores, several of the geezers would have maced P+ employees by now.
>>
File: SNW-poster2.jpg (401 KB, 1080x1600)
401 KB
401 KB JPG
>>170021368
>Whether it matters or not is irrelevant. The point is that SNW is the worst performing live-action NuTrek outing yet!!!

See you Thursday for another all new episode of Star Trek: Strange New Worlds. And next Spring for an all new S02.
>>
>>170021610
Yes! All T-Mobile subscribers love NuTrek!
>>
>>170020236

I sensed it while watching it, but wasn't %100 sure. Look him up on the internet and you will see that "they" is a man immediately. They definitely did something digitally to make him more appealing on the screen.
>>
>>170021603
>Paramount is relentlessly declining with no sign of reversal.
"20 down 10 to go"
>>
>>170021152
>>170021413
Britbong here. Ads for Paramount+ are now showing up on TV and its fucking ridiculous, like they're going out of their way to show off everything but Trek. Wasn't this franchise supposed to be their flagship.
>>
>>170021667
Hey, MKUltranny, remember how you said that everyone who ever even mentions Chris-Chan is a fucking autist? Oh, you've fallen so low. Even for you.
>>
File: 20341-577-17938.gif (931 KB, 250x197)
931 KB
931 KB GIF
>>170021668
>in three weeks, we'll no longer have weekly new Star Trek to watch until 2023
>>
>>170021668
>>170021709
I only care about data, and data is not looking good. No amount of hissy fits or schizo cope will change that.
>>
>>170021741
What about Lower Decks, Prodigy and Discovery?
>>
>>170021711
Trek has hit critical mass to be self sustaining so they show off the networks other assets
We got a big Halo campaign here for example
>>
>>170021776
No release date.
>>
>>170018368
>the two worst old Trek series both have autistic looking goblin gnome freak things in the cast
>>
>>170021776
Discovery only just started filming S5, including post that won't be ready this year, Picard is finished filming and in the middle of post and is confirmed 2023
Next LD and Prodigy seasons aren't scheduled yet
>>
File: download (14).jpg (15 KB, 284x177)
15 KB
15 KB JPG
>>170021711
>white male Bong can't figure out why advertisements in Britain don't target him
lol
>>
>>170021844
Prodigy is actually airing on Nickelodeon right now so S1 pt. 2 is probably coming in 10 weeks.
>>
>>170021803
That's not a very nice thing to say about Scotty and O'Brien.
>>
>>170021413
For what it's worth, no one is talking about new STD seasons either.
>>
>>170021776
CG has convinced himself those shows won't air again in 2022. He's been screaming that for a week.

Which means any day now we'll get their new premier dates.
>>
>>170021845
Did I say I was white.
>>
>>170021736
>MKUltra is a schizo
So what's new?
>>
>>170021747
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data." Nothing you've posted qualifies as data because you don't have access to it. Only Disney and Paramount know how The Orville and the Trek shows are doing, and based on their behavior we can readily conclude which is succeeding (Trek) and which is a clusterfuck headed for cancellation (The Orville).
>>
what is the most stupidest episode ever
>>
>>170021882
Lower Decks has been confirmed next one airing after SNW ends for ages, they just haven't said exactly when which breaks the DIS-PIC-SNW unbroken streak
>>
>>170021736
Nice false flag, MKUltranny, who is triple vaxed because of a microcomputer orgy. We're on to your troonish ways.
>>
>>170021923
Paramount will continue producing new Star Trek until they go down in flames. Sunk cost fallacy, anon.
>>
File: 2164429.jpg (46 KB, 600x443)
46 KB
46 KB JPG
>>170021907
The point, dumbass, is that Paramount+ ads in England are focused on shit that appeals to the typical Englishman, like pic related. He isn't the type of fellow who likes Star Trek.
>>
>>170021948
You tried this before. You failed, but you keep making the same mistakes. Why are you acting like this?
>>
>>170021938
They don't have a release date, because it's in development hell.
>>
>>170021983
RENT FREE
>>
>>170021874
Scotty and O'Brien are clear hoo-man
>>
>>170021955
>Paramount will continue producing new Star Trek until they go down in flames.
Correct. So long as Paramount is a viable company, they will make Star Trek. Paramount is one of the healthiest companies on the planet. It's market cap is multibillion, it owns the most watched tv network in the United States, and it has been around for about a century.

Better buckle up and get ready for decades and decades of new Star Trek in the mold of SNW, LOW, and PRO.
>>
>>170021992
If it was it would be animation based as voice recording finished a couple of months ago
>>
>>170021938
Typically, when the new season starts the previous season Bluray/DVD set comes out, for cross promotion. The LOW S02 box comes out mid-July, so that was probably the intended launch date. But now there's another 10 episodes of PRO S01.5 to slot in somewhere.

FWIW, the recent promo efforts seem to be almost all PRO. They could put out 5 eps of PRO, then LOW, then more PRO.
>>
>>170022002
Here, allow me to soothe your anger with a picture of some smoking hot English babes. Hubba hubba!
>>
>>170022069
It didn't save Twentieth-Century Fox.
>>
>>170022174
>It didn't save Twentieth-Century Fox.
Umm what? Are you under the impression that Fox failed?
>>
>>170022212
They got acquired by Disney. Paramount will be next.
By whom? I've no idea.
>>
>>170021991
Fuck it, I'm in a good mood so you'll get a real answer. It always makes me laugh. Sometimes it makes actual MKUltra laugh. It provides you with a negative incentive for your meta bullshit. Win win from where I sit. Now there's your earnest answer, go back to being so tiresome or whatever you do and eat shit.
>>
>>170022069
And a century from now, no Star Trek will exist past ENT
nTrek is not Star Trek
>>
>>170022174
holy shit dude you should delete this immediately

it makes you look turbo-retarded
>>
File: janegay.jpg (171 KB, 2580x1997)
171 KB
171 KB JPG
i cant believe the massive change in direction that voyager took with seven of nine in s4
>>
>>170022235
>>
>>170022229
>They got acquired by Disney.
Do you think that means Fox failed? Do you think that means Fox shut down production of its popular products, like the Simpsons?
>>
Hole
>>
>>170022174
>>170022229
Retard.
>>
>>170022298
For all intents and purposes, it no longer exists.
>>
>>170022170
Damn look at the one with glasses

BRB about to cum
>>
>>170022235
>acting like a retarded beta bitch makes me laugh
Uhh... OK?
>>
>>170022251
>it's Disney now
You aren't really smart, are you?
>>
>>170021668
I’m watching the episode now I’ll report back with a review
>>
>>170022251
>gets acquired by Disney because it was a failing company
>shill thinks this is a success
>>
>>170022322
All intensive purposes*
>>
>>170021668
No Star Trek show is being made
>>
>>170022322
>For all intents and purposes, it no longer exists.
That's like saying Dodge no longer exists because some company named Stellantis bought it. You have absolutely no idea how corporations work.
>>
File: Spoiler Image (68 KB, 1200x628)
68 KB
68 KB JPG
>>170022429
Not if you’ve weaponized mental illness
>>
>>170022401
>geezer thinks that successful companies buy failing companies
lololololololol holy shit dude

no wonder you live in a basement
>>
>>170022429
That's correct, if you're mentally ill.
>>
>>170022448
The geezers won't understand this. They think that because Disney bought most of the shares of Fox, that somehow killed Fox and made it non-existent.
>>
You can tell it's new episode day once again.
>>
>>170022504
Successful companies don't get taken over.
>>
>it was all a dream
>>
FUCK YOU PEOPLE

PARAMOUNT+ ISN'T REAL

IT'S FAKE AND ALL THE NUMBERS ARE FAKE

IT IS FAILING AND ONLY SURVIVES BECAUSE IT IS GIVEN AS A GIFT TO BOOST MOBILE SUBSCRIBERS
>>
File: 1655469440951.jpg (54 KB, 768x1024)
54 KB
54 KB JPG
>>170022301
Me first me first!
>>
>>170022516
Sitting down to watch this weeks episode of Star Trek right now. Thanks for letting anon know what’s up
>>
Paramount stock is going back to $10 and there's nothing you can do about it.
>>
>>170022558
>Successful companies don't get taken over.
lol imagine believing this
>>
>>170022301
A hole's a hole.
>>
>>170022659
No one's discussing who is going to buy Apple. I wonder why?
>>
>>170022596
Nice false flag, MKUltra, who—eh fuck it, too low effort. Take fewer tranny pills and more crazy pills.
>>
>>170022709
>No one's discussing who is going to buy Apple. I wonder why?
Apple is a publicly traded company. You can buy whatever % of it you can afford at any time, anon.
>>
File: ab-ruh-dab-bruh.png (1.17 MB, 1552x793)
1.17 MB
1.17 MB PNG
How many wizards are in here?
>>
>>170022621
No worries brother. We have to stick together against the anti-Trek menace.
>>
Two more years of NuTrek tops. The money is running out.
>>
>>170022605
Why do they make her eyebrows so disgusting in the show when they look good IRL?
>>
Which NuTrek show do you think will get cancelled first?
>>
One that hasn't been made yet, since none of the current ones will be any time soon
>>
>>170022875
Picard
>>
>>170022833
Because she needs to look like a dyed blonde to appease the roasties
>>
>>170022875
None of them are going to get cancelled. Some are just going to end. For example, Picard was always a 3 season show.
>>
File: 1a6a6614.gif (3.59 MB, 298x224)
3.59 MB
3.59 MB GIF
>>170022817
>The money is running out.
Lmao it ain't going nowhere.

https://collider.com/star-trek-discovery-season-5-filming-soon-doug-jones-bts-image/

https://twitter.com/michelleparadis/status/1533919011179741192

The money will never run dry.
>>
>>170022928
I wouldn't consider that a cancellation per se. It was always supposed to be a limited thing.
>>
>>170022833
They always make attractive women ugly. Even Rebecca Romijn looks terrible in some episodes because of retarded haircuts.
>>
>>170022928
Picard reached it's planned three seasons and ended, it wasn't cancelled.
>>
File: acascac.jpg (14 KB, 256x256)
14 KB
14 KB JPG
>SISKO, I AM GAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
>>
>>170022981
>>170022933
I agree, she looks so much hotter as Terran. They just make her worse on purpose in the regular universe.
>>
>>170022964
Nothing lasts forever. Another Star Trek crash is inevitable, and franchise fatigue is mostly to blame.
>>
File: tam elbrun.jpg (23 KB, 694x530)
23 KB
23 KB JPG
>>170023048
BUY THE DIP! DIAMOND HANDS. HODL TO THE MOOOOOOON
>>
>>170023048
>Nothing lasts forever.
/trek/ will.
>>
>>170023087
but it will be all gay
>>
>>170023048
Not before Doctor Who.
>>
>>170023048
Trek has diversified itself enough that it's no longer vulnerable to fatigue the way it used to be. Different shows are targeted at different demos and are only made in 10 episode seasons, no more churning out 26 episodes a year until the writing teams are completely gassed the way it happened with TNG era Trek
>>
>>170023026
Go away with your disgusting fat pig, you faggot.
>>
>>170023160
Doesn't matter. Too many shows, audiences don't give a shit about any of them.
>>
>>170023145
Dr Who perpetually reboots anyway.
>>
>>170023170
You will not take away my sweet lard bucket girl
>>
>>170023203
it is easy when it is 1 character with cameos
versus an essemble cast
>>
>>170023132
Is that AI-generated Spirk? Neat.
>>
>>170023203
So does Trek.
>>
>>170023241
it is not, it is only upscaled, but I can try some AI spirk
>>
>>170023264
It's harder for Trek.
>>
>>170023191
>Too many shows

Nope. Nobody is watching all of them at the same time except Trek die hards who are a captive audience who won't leave no matter what. An average person who watches DIS and SNW isn't going to be fatigued by LD and PRO existing, they won't be watching them anyway.

>audiences don't give a shit about any of them.

Objectively wrong.
>>
>>170023241
I'm sure Dall-e could generate Spirk. Fujoshi artists will soon be redunant.
>>
>>170023316
Again, Google Trends point to a clear decline in popularity of Star Trek. Above all else, NuTrek failed to create new, younger fans.

You look at pictures of recent Star Trek conventions and most attendees are old as fuck.
>>
>>170023317
we have a new class of artist now
the ones who can make prompts on DALL-E with extremely good results
>>
>>170023048
>Nothing lasts forever.
They've been making Hercule Poirot movies since 1931, anon. They've been making Sherlock Holmes movies since 1916.
>>
>>170023359
>You look at pictures of recent Star Trek conventions and most attendees are old as fuck.
It's because conventions have jacked up costs to the point than only old fucks can afford to go. Also, good luck taking a week long vacation as a wagey in The Current Year.
>>
>>170023406
Star Trek's died before.
>>
>>170023406
Poirot won't survive the Sun going supernova
>>
>>170023208
kys for your own good
>>
>>170023457
Our generation love Trek more than oldfags ever did, so we won’t let that happen again
>>
>>170023406
public domain
>>
File: garashir.png (465 KB, 512x512)
465 KB
465 KB PNG
>>170023317
>>170023385
DALL-E is weaksauce compared to some other engines. I am working to refine a good Garashir.
>>
>>170023529
>Our generation
It's the same fucking generation. There are no young Star Trek fans.
>>
>>170023534
Wrong. In the civilized world, Poirot is still under copyright until 2046.
>>
>>170023561
DALL-E is god tier
but the public available is the MINI only with some seconds of rendering.
Even Mini would generate more details if they rendered for 5 minutes.
>>
>>170023486
You first, preferably in a hoursfire, lmao
>>
>>170023561
We will watch your career with great interest.
>>
>>170022301
Butt slut
>>
>>170023486
Keep yourself safe too anon
>>
>>170023026
There is nothing funnier than her becoming clearly the hottest character on the show and having to be removed to not outshine the trans freaks.
>>
>>170023471
Yes he will.
>>
>>170023026
Fat people would not survice in MI
>>
File: garashir3.png (1.27 MB, 1024x1024)
1.27 MB
1.27 MB PNG
>>170023648
This engine tends to work well when you give a style (e.g., "in the style of caravaggio," etc.) Certain characters do better in certain styles. Neelix is just amazing done up in the style of HR Giger. Garashir tends to do well in the style of Studio Ghibli for some reason.

Two men in their old age realize their true love had been there all along.
>>
>>170023780
>Neelix is just amazing done up in the style of HR Giger
Fascinating.
>>
File: sad.jpg (24 KB, 385x385)
24 KB
24 KB JPG
Why can't nutrekfags just leave us alone, bros...
>>
>>170023653
Can I be yours? uwu
>>
>>170023797
Typically, all images in /trek/ are Star Trek themed.
>>
>>170023780
Could you make Tawny Newsome and Jack Quaid kiss?
>>
File: Stage One Cancer.jpg (99 KB, 768x1068)
99 KB
99 KB JPG
>>170021668
oh sorry wrong image
>>
>>170023797
Genius idea: Just make a star trek thread on >>>/pol/ for likeminded morons. BECAUSE IF YOU HAVEN'T FUCKING NOTICED, NO ONE IN HERE FUCKING CARES AND NEVER WILL WHAT YOU THINK
>>
File: 1649726116957.jpg (123 KB, 867x865)
123 KB
123 KB JPG
>>170023797
Because even the old show itself was about accepting the new and passing the torch.
If you can't find the irony that you don't live by the show standarts, you kinda dumb.
>>
>>170018368
I'm annoyed that the PlutoTV ST channel only shows TNG. I like the show but I'd like some variety too.
>>
New:

>>170023820
>>170023820
>>170023820
>>
>>170023853
>>170023853
>BECAUSE IF YOU HAVEN'T FUCKING NOTICED, NO ONE IN HERE FUCKING CARES AND NEVER WILL WHAT YOU THINK
Speak for yourself
>>
>>170022301
They had a trans man on SNW right? Because Mr. Schaffer wasn't available.
>>
>>170023841
First pass, I might want to apply an artist's painting style to prevent weirdness.
>>
>>170023975
Aw fuck, this is good. Creepily good.
>>
File: PRI_169629364.jpg (128 KB, 1122x781)
128 KB
128 KB JPG
>>170023742
If we were still in season 1 she may have had a shot but considering her now... lol just no. The hottest STD character is unironically Michael inb4 le epic nigger hate meme
>>
>>170022114
It's not. LD is too popular and bad for the brand so they don't want to advertise it.
>>
>>170023975
which model is this?
>>
>>170023992
Micheal isn't as consistent.
>>
NEW
>>170024039
>>170024039
>>170024039
>>
>>170024017
this
>>
>>170023932
not until you become aware of gay and entitled you sound
>>
>>170023975
Impressive.
>>
Actual New, was made first:

>>170023820
>>170023820
>>170023820

>>170023820
>>170023820
>>170023820

>>170023820
>>170023820
>>170023820
>>
>>170024017
>>170024067
midjourney, it usually takes me about 4-5 passes, with 2-3 variants and 2-3 rerolls to get something of quality.
>>
>>170024105
Cringe /pol/tard thread
>>170024042
Based /trek/
>>
>>170020600
feels like they picked a lane this season but the wrong one
>>
NEW
>>170024039
>>170024039
>>170024039
>>
Actual New:


>>170023820
>>170023820
>>170023820
>>
ACTUALer NEW
>>170024039
>>170024039
>>170024039
>>
>>170022420
Errors like that are a diamond dozen
>>
>>170024254
>>170024368
>made 6 minutes after the other one
you lost
>>
>>170018608
Fuck off, Kurtzman
>>
>>170018802
You people are extreme faggots. It's completely reasonable to not care for certain eras of a franchise that spans decades. Current trek is objectively worse than whats come before.
>>
>>170024601
And you never moved on with your life
>>
>>170024601
It's toxic positivity. The Star Wars fans are starting to realize what to call it.
>>
>>170024601
>objectively
You don't seem to understand what this word means.
>>
A Challenger Approaches:

>>170024791
>>170024791
>>
Neutral new:

>>170025211
>>170025211
>>170025211
>>
FUCKING STOP IT
>>
>>170018368
Actual new:
>>170025592
>>170025592
>>170025592



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.