1966-2005 edition>>170004014
Why is it all so fucking tiresome?
>>170018368This seems to be missing a bunch of images
>>170018453It's fine. Only from 66-05.
>>170018368What's the best verbal rape Picard has ever delivered?I loved when he destroyed admiral Satie, but also when he destroyed commander Maddox
>>170018453No. It features all Star Trek shows.
>>170018534telling Will that he doesn't deserve to wear that uniform
>>170018410You get the fun you make. Me? I try to build bridges.
Green shirt kirk irrationally irritates me. Like I feel his power-level is reduced in that hideous garment
>>170018558It's missing the Star Trek shows DISCO, PIC, PRO, LD and SNW
>>170018558It is clearly missing a number of Star Trek shows
>>170018608That can't be right.
>>170018608 >DISCO, PIC,
>>170018410>>170018581Off-topic. Fuck off.
>>170018608Sorry, this is not the fanfic thread
>>170018604>Green shirt kirk irrationally irritates me.It's based.
>>170018604It's like Picard with the leather shouldered jacket
>>170018558>>170018641>>170018645
>>170018608None of these are Star Trek shows. Plus, I never heard of this "DISCO" thing in the first place.There are some honorary Star Trek shows, though. SG-1, SeaQuest, Babylon 5... Maybe you meant one of those.
>>170018368I love The Wright Stuff pioneer angle of Enterprise also the lore building with other races. Actually I just love Enterprise. Could have been better but god has Canadian Star Trek made it look phenomenal.
>>170018697I've always found that jacket stupidAlso, the voyager uniform is the ugliest one from the tng era
>>170018368Do you think one day we'll get a seventh entry?
>>170018604The uglier the garment the more powerful he grows.
>>170018410Lack of vitamin D in space.
>>170018641Nu Trek forever in your head.RENT FREEt. Captain Angel I'll be back
>>170018802Actually I forget it very easily.
>>170018802>I can't stop mentioning it>but you're obsessed about it!!!OK, schizo.
>>170018796I think it's more likely that we'll get star trek in real life (after the whole war and unrest debacle) than have another proper show made
The only series I have on display, because they’re the only ones I regularly rewatch.
>>170018754>None of these are Star Trek shows.The owners of Star Trek say they're Star Trek. So they're Star Trek.
>>170018534I personally like the "Mutiny, on a Federation starship, that's shocking. It's unthinkable. And yet you've never mentioned it" bit with Riker in The Pegasus. It's not overly dramatic, it's not a monologue defending some point of ethics, it's just a Captain being mad as hell he's being railroaded by the officers ranking above and below him, and in the next scene the mad Admiral wants to take the whole fucking Enterprise into the asteroid.
>>170018907Star Trek is a state of mind.
>>170018886>Has the ship from Star Trek: Lower Decksbased
>>170018368Is the cartoon good?
>>170018845It's more of a switch I get to flip in your head to get my (You)s
>>170018944all three cartoons are good
>>170018907I don't care what your owners say.
>>170018944It's good fun...
>>170018931It’s a damn pretty design in a damn pretty color scheme.
>>170018907You can say an apple is an orange, but words have meaning and an apple will always be an apple and not an orange, no matter what label you slap on it.
>>170018965>I'm not obsessed you are!OK, schizo.
>>170018974They own the brand. They make the rules. Make a bootleg Star Trek like Seth did and then you can lay down your rules.
>>170019015I guess my (You)s were so delicious you want more?
>>170018907Deckard is not a replicantIt's pronounced gif, not jifCaptain Amelia does not have a cockWhen the owners get corrupted their words lose all meaning and weight
>>170019053Ah yes, word pronunciation, famous sign of corruption.
>>170018754>Claiming Star Trek shows aren't Star Trek>while one of the shows in the OP isn't even called Star Trek
>>170018604>>170018697>>170018761>>170018798SNW ruined the green shirt. It's supposed to be a little more tight fitting and they made Pike wear a black shirt underneath. It's wrong.
>>170018558It's only missing lower decks the rest is fine
>>170019053>Deckard is not a replicantHe is.>It's pronounced gif, not jifIncorrect, but who cares about pronunciation?>Captain Amelia does not have a cockShe does.
>>170018604IT'S CALLED A COMMAND WRAP
>>170019101>Claiming Star Trek shows aren't Star Trek???
>>170018802>Jim, did I ever tell you about Captain Angel? "They" were a hilariously incompetent space pirate, a fine piece of enby ass from a more civilized age. She had the tightest body and the perkiest little breasts in the galaxy; barely legal in most systems. Captain Pike and I used to doubleteam her at the end of every plot of hers we thwarted during our last five-year mission, and once in a while we’d even have the entire crew run a train over her, part of official Starfleet "discipline" of course. In time, she learned how to handle a meatphaser better than any girl on the ship. She wore a skintight bodysuit every day so we told her there were no panties in space, and since she was constantly crawling up jefferies tubes you’d get a glimpse of her pink bussy mid fight as she'd be escorted to the bridge for her latest punishment. It was surreal. We taught her to grip her weapon backwards like a dildo and she constantly got captured by Klingon pirates and Orion slavers almost every other day. It was ridiculous, like a constant porno, Jim, you have no idea. And she was a good friend.
>>170019101>while one of the shows in the OP isn't even called Star TrekBetter luck next time.
>>170019136t. corporate bootlicker
>>170019106It was tight fitting on Kirk because Shatner is a fattie.
>>170019167>posted edited imagesc'mon son
>>170019167>Only called Star Trek after Enterprise flopped for the first two seasons.Not Star Trek. If you're ashamed to be called a Star Trek show then you don't get to be a Trek show even when you come crawling back.
>>170019208Why are you lying? He didn't edit that image. I'll never believe your words ever again.
>>170018944It's for children and it wasn't even good at that because nobody actually ever watched it
>>170019160>Captain Pike and I used to doubleteam her at the end of every plot of hers we thwarted during our last five-year mission, and once in a while we’d even have the entire crew run a train over her, part of official Starfleet "discipline" of course.Thanks, that was a beautiful read!
>>170018410Spock generally finds things tiresome. Autists usually do.
>>170019208>>170019227All I hear is excuses. Smallville had the same argument. It was still a Superman show. Have some faith.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=urYH6xEyXw0&t=9s
>>170019180He was no more a fattie than Peck and Mount.
wHy ArE yOu NoT wAtChiNG thE BoREviLLe, /nuTreK/???
>>170019167to be fair they did drop the star trek from ENT title at first.
>>170019405Who cares about either those pieces of shit?
*short pause*SKREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEONK
>>170019405What are you trying to prove here? That both of these shows are semi-popular?
>>170019331It worked for Smallville. It didn't work for Enterprise. Enterprise lacked faith in Star Trek, and deserves to be punished because of that.
>>170019476Based
>>170019333>>170019180>It was tight fitting on Kirk because Shatner is a fattie.From what I have seen Shatner was fine. Think of the green shirt like gym gear. It's meant to be light and easy to remove.
>>170018608Nu trek isn't Trek. It isn't cannon.
>>170018754Oh its STD
>>170019595>it is another episode of a fucking /pol/tard feeling clever because some image gives him security there is some semitic plot going onReal glad there are images to empower retards. The internet is a beautiful thing. What God used to give people in the past, now can be done with a few infographics that exactly blame a common enemy for all your problems.
>>170018368> Brand new episode of the hit series Star Trek: Strange New Worlds> CG proceeds to troll and spam /trek/.Must you always?
>>170019758Why do you think the NuTrek simp came here from /pol/?
>>170019770>CGComputer-generated?
>hour old thread>80 posts>23 ips
>>170019817Yes. I hate the new special effects. New stuff suck!
>>170018802ask your doctor about taking this
>tfw postan hapi giger neex =>^_^<=
>>170019877Psycho PosterQu'est-ce que c'est?
>>170019877/swg/ is killing /trek/.
>La'an dog mum starts to sing
In Trek News, it's Emmy nomination time:https://www.goldderby.com/article/2022/star-trek-emmy-submissions-discovery-picard/
>>170020078She's surprisingly based.
>>170019914And why would I need to?
>>170019248All of Star Trek is for children
>>170019208Such a good font. Miss that show so dam much
>>170020172That's star warsChildren find star trek boring
>>170020157Because you're a trannyhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8839957/
>>170018802So it was a tranny the whole time?Wowowo I wonder what it looks like without all the cameras and makeup and angles.I was honestly fooled, bros.
>>170020212Kids nowadays find Star Wars boring too.
>>170019522>Enterprise lacked faith in Star TrekExactly the opposite. ENT dropped the title at first cuz they figured at that point people would recognise the name "Enterprise" alone as Star Trek.
>>170020266Indeed, fr fr. It is not bussin. There is in fact cap.
Great episode
>>170020281Enterprise dropped the title in an attempt to get people who thought of Trek as "nerd shit" to watch the show. That's why it had stuff like the decontamination gel.
>>170020356Forgot linkhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-ywkuT84KQ
>>170018754Also Orville
Imagine thinking TNG, DS9, VOY, and ENT are "Old Trek."
>>170020109For me it was the Huntress.
>>170020408>Disneyshit>Real TrekKill yourself.
>>170020218No, I am an ally. I will never change my body but empower all trans*people by being supportive of them because it makes you so fucking mad xd. Why don't you 42% yourself, poltard?
>>170019008>You can say an apple is an orangeSub 50 IQ on display.If God says an apple is an orange, then an apple is an orange. Paramount/CBS is the god of Star Trek. If they say X is Star Trek, then X is Star Trek.
>>170020447Those actually upended Roddenberry's vision
>>170020455We were talking about honorary Treks
>>170020506Took you one hour to come up with that?
>>170018368The latest ep was sweetENT sucked btw
>>170020566>The latest ep was sweetAgreed
>>170018410Better than Picard
>>170020585Pity reply.
>>170019482They're not. SNW is genuinely popular. The Orville is horrendously unpopular because Seth MacFaglane couldn't ever pick a lane between comedy and Berman-Braga-Behr BoreTrek, and also because he filled the show with faggotry and cuckoldry and Reddit-style fedora atheism.
>>170020078Voulez vous coucher avec moi et Noel Wells?
>>170020600SNW is 14th on IMDB while The Orville is 16th. This implies their popularity is fairly similar.
>>170020600>SNW is genuinely popularSNW shills are hilarious
>>170020544That's my first post of the day, fren. Some of us have jobs and families. I know nobody on the anti-Paramount+ side does, but the rest of us do.Yes, Paramount has the authority to define what is and is not Star Trek, just as God has the authority to define what is and isn't an apple. I'm sorry you're too autistic to understand these concepts.
>>170020699It doesn't imply anything, anon. IMDB data is objectively worthless, just like nearly all "user generated" data on the Internet. We already know Disney makes heavy use of bots and click farms.
>>170020774That's why I use Google Trends. SNW is the worst performing live-action NuTrek series so far.
>>170020508Yep. TNG/DS9/VOY/ENT was a bad ripoff of TOS/TAS. The Soap Operazation of Star Trek.The SNW/LOW/PRO line of shows is the bona fide successor to TOS/TAS.
>>170020812LOL you think there's Google data from the 1960s and 1980s? Holy shit you should kill yourself.
>>170020867TNG Season One is the purest version of Roddenberry's vision.
>>170020542Sorry, I'm very dumb. It's because my dads used to rape me all the time when I was a kid. Since then I have trouble with concentrating on anything that's not a big, tasty cock.
>>170020726>>170020867Imagine shilling this hard for free
>>170020899Did your mother drop you on your head when you were a baby?
>>170020703SNW is a huge critical and commercial success. The Orville has been on the cancellation block for two years. Sad that you live in delusion-land and can't figure that out. Reminds me of "20 down 10 to go."
Time for some /trek/ feels. Which moment from the franchise do you think has the most feels?Personally, mine is Tasha's funeral. It's the music that does it.https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jUzALSFR-_E
>>170020703Shills aside, how popular is SNW really? Do normies even know it exists?
>>170020905>TNG Season One is the purest version of Roddenberry's vision.No, TNG season 1 is Roddenberry after 20 years of huffing his own farts.
>>170020952>huge critical and commercial successNope. >>170020812
>>170020812>That's why I use Google Trends!!!Actually, since you're both technologically and mathematically innumerate, the Geeze on twitter you swipe your goggle spam is the one who uses it. You're just a copy cat.
>>170020812Orville is more popular than Strange New Worlds according to Google Trends. SNWbros...
>>170021005ESL fingers wrote this post.
>>170021005I don't respond to schizo cope. Data is data.
>>170020965>Shills aside, how popular is SNW really? Do normies even know it exists?Why do we care? Star Trek sucks ass when produced for some bonehead mass audience. VOY and ENT are proof of that.
>>170021033>Why do we care? Star Trek sucks ass when produced for some bonehead mass audience. STD, SPIC, LODE and SNW are proof of that.ftfy
>>170021006It really is, huh. Would you look at that...
>>170020999Imagine thinking "Google Trends" is proof of how successful something is. All that matters is how many people pay their $4.99 a month to Paramount+ and then click "Star Trek: Strange New Worlds" once they're in. That's literally the only measure of success in today's tv world.Enough people are paying their $4.99 to Paramount+ and watching the Kurtzman Star Trek shows that Paramount has gone wild with them, and all are on permanent insta-renewal as a result. That's all that matters, anon.
>>170021084>United states >not worldwide
>>170020965I said to my friend there's a new Star Trek. He said "the one with the black girl?"no one uses Paramount+
>>170021149Neither is premiering worldwide so who gives a shit.
>>170021152>tfw people associate Mikey Spock with NuTrek and not Beckett Marinerfeels bad man
>>170021145CG is convinced that if he just screams enough they'll take Star Trek off the TV. Meanwhile in reality, half dozen series in production with a new episode a week and a new movie about to start filming.
>>170021084Imagine thinking meaningless Google data matters. The Orville has been cancelled. Star Trek: Strange New Worlds (and all the other P+ shows) are running along just fine and in no danger of cancellation whatsoever.Cry about it, grandpa.
>>170021152>no one uses Paramount+!!!40 million subscribers. Continue to cope.
>>170021152>no one uses Paramount+This. Literally no one subscribes to Paramount+ except employees. The entire thing is a money laundering scheme.
>>170021267The numbers are all fake. Paramount+ isn't even something I can watch on my TV. No one can.
>>170021234Whether it matters or not is irrelevant. The point is that SNW is the worst performing live-action NuTrek outing yet.
>>170021304>the crazy geezer can't even watch streaming services on his shitty 1970s televisionLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL holy shit you really do live in a basement
>>170021152I talked with two friends of mine. One likes Star Trek, but hasn't seen everything yet, the other watched everything from TOS to ENT adn even tried SPIC S1 (not STD though) and hated it. None of them had any clue there's a new Trek show. It's fucking ridiculous. I've even seen some normies talking about SPIC and LODE (barely, but still). SNW is a non-entity for them. I guess you can say the same about PRO, but that's a kid's show, so whatever, who cares?
>>170021368>The point is that SNW is the worst performing live-action NuTrek outing yet.That would be Enterprise, home skillet. Enterprise was so bad it literally killed a broadcast network.
>>170021267>40 million subscribers.You mean the T-Mobile subscribers?
>>170021226Paramount is a dying company.
>>170021413"No one I know voted for Nixon"
>someone mentions Paramount+>MKUltranny having a mental diarrhea again
>>170020542You're equating The Orville to real Trek. Die.
>>170021450We have actual viewing figures for Enterprise. I would say that it was probably still more popular than any NuTrek show.NuTrek is still locked behind a streaming service no one uses.
>>170021493>someone said something decades agoOK
>>170021477Yeah remember when Coca-Cola failed? That was such a shame.
>>170021503yeah, being this batshit about someone saying a streaming service isn't popular is odd to say the least
>>170021463Stop pointing this out, Crazy Geezer!!!
>>170021540>not understanding the referencelolsad
>>170021556Paramount is relentlessly declining with no sign of reversal.
>>170021520>NuTrek is still locked behind a streaming service no one uses.40 million subscribers all watch it.
>>170021591>B-B-BUT SOMEONE SAID SOMETHING!!!OK?
>>170021610
>>170021561Many anons like to laugh at crazy autistics who claim that things they don't like are unpopular simply because they don't like them. It's Chris-Chan-tier autism. If Paramount+ had brick and mortar stores, several of the geezers would have maced P+ employees by now.
>>170021368>Whether it matters or not is irrelevant. The point is that SNW is the worst performing live-action NuTrek outing yet!!!See you Thursday for another all new episode of Star Trek: Strange New Worlds. And next Spring for an all new S02.
>>170021610Yes! All T-Mobile subscribers love NuTrek!
>>170020236I sensed it while watching it, but wasn't %100 sure. Look him up on the internet and you will see that "they" is a man immediately. They definitely did something digitally to make him more appealing on the screen.
>>170021603>Paramount is relentlessly declining with no sign of reversal."20 down 10 to go"
>>170021152>>170021413Britbong here. Ads for Paramount+ are now showing up on TV and its fucking ridiculous, like they're going out of their way to show off everything but Trek. Wasn't this franchise supposed to be their flagship.
>>170021667Hey, MKUltranny, remember how you said that everyone who ever even mentions Chris-Chan is a fucking autist? Oh, you've fallen so low. Even for you.
>>170021668>in three weeks, we'll no longer have weekly new Star Trek to watch until 2023
>>170021668>>170021709I only care about data, and data is not looking good. No amount of hissy fits or schizo cope will change that.
>>170021741What about Lower Decks, Prodigy and Discovery?
>>170021711Trek has hit critical mass to be self sustaining so they show off the networks other assetsWe got a big Halo campaign here for example
>>170021776No release date.
>>170018368>the two worst old Trek series both have autistic looking goblin gnome freak things in the cast
>>170021776Discovery only just started filming S5, including post that won't be ready this year, Picard is finished filming and in the middle of post and is confirmed 2023Next LD and Prodigy seasons aren't scheduled yet
>>170021711>white male Bong can't figure out why advertisements in Britain don't target himlol
>>170021844Prodigy is actually airing on Nickelodeon right now so S1 pt. 2 is probably coming in 10 weeks.
>>170021803That's not a very nice thing to say about Scotty and O'Brien.
>>170021413For what it's worth, no one is talking about new STD seasons either.
>>170021776CG has convinced himself those shows won't air again in 2022. He's been screaming that for a week.Which means any day now we'll get their new premier dates.
>>170021845Did I say I was white.
>>170021736>MKUltra is a schizoSo what's new?
>>170021747The plural of "anecdote" is not "data." Nothing you've posted qualifies as data because you don't have access to it. Only Disney and Paramount know how The Orville and the Trek shows are doing, and based on their behavior we can readily conclude which is succeeding (Trek) and which is a clusterfuck headed for cancellation (The Orville).
what is the most stupidest episode ever
>>170021882Lower Decks has been confirmed next one airing after SNW ends for ages, they just haven't said exactly when which breaks the DIS-PIC-SNW unbroken streak
>>170021736Nice false flag, MKUltranny, who is triple vaxed because of a microcomputer orgy. We're on to your troonish ways.
>>170021923Paramount will continue producing new Star Trek until they go down in flames. Sunk cost fallacy, anon.
>>170021907The point, dumbass, is that Paramount+ ads in England are focused on shit that appeals to the typical Englishman, like pic related. He isn't the type of fellow who likes Star Trek.
>>170021948You tried this before. You failed, but you keep making the same mistakes. Why are you acting like this?
>>170021938They don't have a release date, because it's in development hell.
>>170021983RENT FREE
>>170021874Scotty and O'Brien are clear hoo-man
>>170021955>Paramount will continue producing new Star Trek until they go down in flames.Correct. So long as Paramount is a viable company, they will make Star Trek. Paramount is one of the healthiest companies on the planet. It's market cap is multibillion, it owns the most watched tv network in the United States, and it has been around for about a century.Better buckle up and get ready for decades and decades of new Star Trek in the mold of SNW, LOW, and PRO.
>>170021992If it was it would be animation based as voice recording finished a couple of months ago
>>170021938Typically, when the new season starts the previous season Bluray/DVD set comes out, for cross promotion. The LOW S02 box comes out mid-July, so that was probably the intended launch date. But now there's another 10 episodes of PRO S01.5 to slot in somewhere.FWIW, the recent promo efforts seem to be almost all PRO. They could put out 5 eps of PRO, then LOW, then more PRO.
>>170022002Here, allow me to soothe your anger with a picture of some smoking hot English babes. Hubba hubba!
>>170022069It didn't save Twentieth-Century Fox.
>>170022174>It didn't save Twentieth-Century Fox.Umm what? Are you under the impression that Fox failed?
>>170022212They got acquired by Disney. Paramount will be next. By whom? I've no idea.
>>170021991Fuck it, I'm in a good mood so you'll get a real answer. It always makes me laugh. Sometimes it makes actual MKUltra laugh. It provides you with a negative incentive for your meta bullshit. Win win from where I sit. Now there's your earnest answer, go back to being so tiresome or whatever you do and eat shit.
>>170022069And a century from now, no Star Trek will exist past ENTnTrek is not Star Trek
>>170022174holy shit dude you should delete this immediatelyit makes you look turbo-retarded
i cant believe the massive change in direction that voyager took with seven of nine in s4
>>170022235
>>170022229>They got acquired by Disney.Do you think that means Fox failed? Do you think that means Fox shut down production of its popular products, like the Simpsons?
Hole
>>170022174>>170022229Retard.
>>170022298For all intents and purposes, it no longer exists.
>>170022170Damn look at the one with glassesBRB about to cum
>>170022235>acting like a retarded beta bitch makes me laughUhh... OK?
>>170022251>it's Disney nowYou aren't really smart, are you?
>>170021668I’m watching the episode now I’ll report back with a review
>>170022251>gets acquired by Disney because it was a failing company>shill thinks this is a success
>>170022322All intensive purposes*
>>170021668No Star Trek show is being made
>>170022322>For all intents and purposes, it no longer exists.That's like saying Dodge no longer exists because some company named Stellantis bought it. You have absolutely no idea how corporations work.
>>170022429Not if you’ve weaponized mental illness
>>170022401>geezer thinks that successful companies buy failing companieslololololololol holy shit dudeno wonder you live in a basement
>>170022429That's correct, if you're mentally ill.
>>170022448The geezers won't understand this. They think that because Disney bought most of the shares of Fox, that somehow killed Fox and made it non-existent.
You can tell it's new episode day once again.
>>170022504Successful companies don't get taken over.
>it was all a dream
FUCK YOU PEOPLEPARAMOUNT+ ISN'T REALIT'S FAKE AND ALL THE NUMBERS ARE FAKEIT IS FAILING AND ONLY SURVIVES BECAUSE IT IS GIVEN AS A GIFT TO BOOST MOBILE SUBSCRIBERS
>>170022301Me first me first!
>>170022516Sitting down to watch this weeks episode of Star Trek right now. Thanks for letting anon know what’s up
Paramount stock is going back to $10 and there's nothing you can do about it.
>>170022558>Successful companies don't get taken over.lol imagine believing this
>>170022301A hole's a hole.
>>170022659No one's discussing who is going to buy Apple. I wonder why?
>>170022596Nice false flag, MKUltra, who—eh fuck it, too low effort. Take fewer tranny pills and more crazy pills.
>>170022709>No one's discussing who is going to buy Apple. I wonder why?Apple is a publicly traded company. You can buy whatever % of it you can afford at any time, anon.
How many wizards are in here?
>>170022621No worries brother. We have to stick together against the anti-Trek menace.
Two more years of NuTrek tops. The money is running out.
>>170022605Why do they make her eyebrows so disgusting in the show when they look good IRL?
Which NuTrek show do you think will get cancelled first?
One that hasn't been made yet, since none of the current ones will be any time soon
>>170022875Picard
>>170022833Because she needs to look like a dyed blonde to appease the roasties
>>170022875None of them are going to get cancelled. Some are just going to end. For example, Picard was always a 3 season show.
>>170022817>The money is running out.Lmao it ain't going nowhere.https://collider.com/star-trek-discovery-season-5-filming-soon-doug-jones-bts-image/ https://twitter.com/michelleparadis/status/1533919011179741192The money will never run dry.
>>170022928I wouldn't consider that a cancellation per se. It was always supposed to be a limited thing.
>>170022833They always make attractive women ugly. Even Rebecca Romijn looks terrible in some episodes because of retarded haircuts.
>>170022928Picard reached it's planned three seasons and ended, it wasn't cancelled.
>SISKO, I AM GAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
>>170022981>>170022933I agree, she looks so much hotter as Terran. They just make her worse on purpose in the regular universe.
>>170022964Nothing lasts forever. Another Star Trek crash is inevitable, and franchise fatigue is mostly to blame.
>>170023048BUY THE DIP! DIAMOND HANDS. HODL TO THE MOOOOOOON
>>170023048>Nothing lasts forever./trek/ will.
>>170023087but it will be all gay
>>170023048Not before Doctor Who.
>>170023048Trek has diversified itself enough that it's no longer vulnerable to fatigue the way it used to be. Different shows are targeted at different demos and are only made in 10 episode seasons, no more churning out 26 episodes a year until the writing teams are completely gassed the way it happened with TNG era Trek
>>170023026Go away with your disgusting fat pig, you faggot.
>>170023160Doesn't matter. Too many shows, audiences don't give a shit about any of them.
>>170023145Dr Who perpetually reboots anyway.
>>170023170You will not take away my sweet lard bucket girl
>>170023203it is easy when it is 1 character with cameosversus an essemble cast
>>170023132Is that AI-generated Spirk? Neat.
>>170023203So does Trek.
>>170023241it is not, it is only upscaled, but I can try some AI spirk
>>170023264It's harder for Trek.
>>170023191>Too many showsNope. Nobody is watching all of them at the same time except Trek die hards who are a captive audience who won't leave no matter what. An average person who watches DIS and SNW isn't going to be fatigued by LD and PRO existing, they won't be watching them anyway. >audiences don't give a shit about any of them.Objectively wrong.
>>170023241I'm sure Dall-e could generate Spirk. Fujoshi artists will soon be redunant.
>>170023316Again, Google Trends point to a clear decline in popularity of Star Trek. Above all else, NuTrek failed to create new, younger fans.You look at pictures of recent Star Trek conventions and most attendees are old as fuck.
>>170023317we have a new class of artist nowthe ones who can make prompts on DALL-E with extremely good results
>>170023048>Nothing lasts forever.They've been making Hercule Poirot movies since 1931, anon. They've been making Sherlock Holmes movies since 1916.
>>170023359>You look at pictures of recent Star Trek conventions and most attendees are old as fuck.It's because conventions have jacked up costs to the point than only old fucks can afford to go. Also, good luck taking a week long vacation as a wagey in The Current Year.
>>170023406Star Trek's died before.
>>170023406Poirot won't survive the Sun going supernova
>>170023208kys for your own good
>>170023457Our generation love Trek more than oldfags ever did, so we won’t let that happen again
>>170023406public domain
>>170023317>>170023385DALL-E is weaksauce compared to some other engines. I am working to refine a good Garashir.
>>170023529>Our generationIt's the same fucking generation. There are no young Star Trek fans.
>>170023534Wrong. In the civilized world, Poirot is still under copyright until 2046.
>>170023561DALL-E is god tierbut the public available is the MINI only with some seconds of rendering.Even Mini would generate more details if they rendered for 5 minutes.
>>170023486You first, preferably in a hoursfire, lmao
>>170023561We will watch your career with great interest.
>>170022301Butt slut
>>170023486Keep yourself safe too anon
>>170023026There is nothing funnier than her becoming clearly the hottest character on the show and having to be removed to not outshine the trans freaks.
>>170023471Yes he will.
>>170023026Fat people would not survice in MI
>>170023648This engine tends to work well when you give a style (e.g., "in the style of caravaggio," etc.) Certain characters do better in certain styles. Neelix is just amazing done up in the style of HR Giger. Garashir tends to do well in the style of Studio Ghibli for some reason.Two men in their old age realize their true love had been there all along.
>>170023780>Neelix is just amazing done up in the style of HR GigerFascinating.
Why can't nutrekfags just leave us alone, bros...
>>170023653Can I be yours? uwu
>>170023797Typically, all images in /trek/ are Star Trek themed.
>>170023780Could you make Tawny Newsome and Jack Quaid kiss?
>>170021668oh sorry wrong image
>>170023797Genius idea: Just make a star trek thread on >>>/pol/ for likeminded morons. BECAUSE IF YOU HAVEN'T FUCKING NOTICED, NO ONE IN HERE FUCKING CARES AND NEVER WILL WHAT YOU THINK
>>170023797Because even the old show itself was about accepting the new and passing the torch.If you can't find the irony that you don't live by the show standarts, you kinda dumb.
>>170018368I'm annoyed that the PlutoTV ST channel only shows TNG. I like the show but I'd like some variety too.
New:>>170023820>>170023820>>170023820
>>170023853>>170023853>BECAUSE IF YOU HAVEN'T FUCKING NOTICED, NO ONE IN HERE FUCKING CARES AND NEVER WILL WHAT YOU THINKSpeak for yourself
>>170022301They had a trans man on SNW right? Because Mr. Schaffer wasn't available.
>>170023841First pass, I might want to apply an artist's painting style to prevent weirdness.
>>170023975Aw fuck, this is good. Creepily good.
>>170023742If we were still in season 1 she may have had a shot but considering her now... lol just no. The hottest STD character is unironically Michael inb4 le epic nigger hate meme
>>170022114It's not. LD is too popular and bad for the brand so they don't want to advertise it.
>>170023975which model is this?
>>170023992Micheal isn't as consistent.
NEW>>170024039>>170024039>>170024039
>>170024017this
>>170023932not until you become aware of gay and entitled you sound
>>170023975Impressive.
Actual New, was made first:>>170023820>>170023820>>170023820>>170023820>>170023820>>170023820>>170023820>>170023820>>170023820
>>170024017>>170024067midjourney, it usually takes me about 4-5 passes, with 2-3 variants and 2-3 rerolls to get something of quality.
>>170024105Cringe /pol/tard thread>>170024042Based /trek/
>>170020600feels like they picked a lane this season but the wrong one
Actual New:>>170023820>>170023820>>170023820
ACTUALer NEW>>170024039>>170024039>>170024039
>>170022420Errors like that are a diamond dozen
>>170024254>>170024368>made 6 minutes after the other oneyou lost
>>170018608Fuck off, Kurtzman
>>170018802You people are extreme faggots. It's completely reasonable to not care for certain eras of a franchise that spans decades. Current trek is objectively worse than whats come before.
>>170024601And you never moved on with your life
>>170024601It's toxic positivity. The Star Wars fans are starting to realize what to call it.
>>170024601>objectivelyYou don't seem to understand what this word means.
A Challenger Approaches: >>170024791>>170024791
Neutral new:>>170025211>>170025211>>170025211
FUCKING STOP IT
>>170018368Actual new:>>170025592>>170025592>>170025592
