>tfw I see another beholder
Why is he crying?
>>87492809He's trapped in The World's Shittiest Role-Playing Game.
>>87492809He saw another beholder. Try to keep up.
>>87492821Is the guy in the bottom right picking his nose or catcalling the beholder?
>>87492755>tfw I see another beholder
>>87492755Wow
>>87492809Someone threw a bag of pepper at it.
>>87492986>>tfw I see another beholder
>>87492755wtf is a befolder? t. never played dungerons before
>>87492755Is Mike Wazowski beholderkin?
>>87497963not enough eyes, he's just a very short cyclops
>tfw I behold another seer
We don't call them that
I have always thought beholders looked lame. I don't know a single person that thinks they look cool. Do you think they look cool?
>>87501240they look alien.
>>87492755Are you operating under the OGL?
>>87501240I like em. They're goofy but malevolent balls of insane bad magic.
>>87501268The OGL didn't covered the use of Beholders. They either needed special permission or pay royalties to use beholders named as beholders.
>>87492755>tfw I see another bee holder
>>87492809He is no longer allowed to be a racist due to WOTC retcons
>>87501336Oh, interesting.I thought that since things like Beholders, Illithids, Slaad, Githyanki, etc. were the only things that were actually copyrightable in general, they would be covered by the OGL.I guess it was only for the precise wording, then?
>>87501279The undead ones are spoopy
>>87492818Worse still, he's one of their notable unique monsters. He's never going to not be in dnd.
>>87501447yeah, for some reason there are a few of dnd specific races&designs that wotc don't care being copied into other systems but Beholder and a few others (i don't remember) they protect to the point of going to court. Think thats also why pathfinder changed lots of the designs and didn't use beholders. >>87501158 is probably the same case.
>>87502645>but Beholder and a few others (i don't remember) they protect to the point of going to court.Beholders specifically they've used as a symbol of the game in past, so that's probably it.
>>87502677How'd this guy get a pass?
>>87502742Cacodemons have two back holes for sexual. Beholders do not.
>>875027421. horns2. no accessory eye stalks
>>87502863Ah, of course. Silly me. >>87502884Astral Dreadnaught was only speculated to be beholder related iirc. The cacodemon is very clearly an 'homage' to the astral dread, more just wondering if anyone has an idea why this wasn't an issue in a more litigious time frame of older tsr stuff.
>>87492755>not beholding another beholderbad post
